they are related to foreign policy trends , mr. doctor, i will interrupt you. let us say goodbye to the viewers of one tv and continue the discussion . stay with the viewers on khabar. thank you very much for staying with us on khabar. . mr. dr. motaghi, you mentioned the important role of the head of the executive branch in the direction and implementation of foreign policy decision makers, so we have two separate parts in the foreign policy of any country, which are related to each other to some extent, one is orientation or orientation, and the second is the national role. jahd in iran. taking foreign policy, which is

the same as the country's macro policy, is in the field of leadership implementation and determination of roles and behavior patterns are related to the president and the team he chooses. the international system was worried about whether the foreign policy cooperation trends. iran, which was formed during the era of ayatollah raisi, will continue or not. the fact is that during the period of ayatollah raisi, we experienced several levels of diplomatic action with different countries. it was an official level that was implemented by the ministry of foreign affairs. on another level, we say leaving you. or the second step or the

second path that is the ground for the negotiation of theorists , unofficial authorities and those in the political construction of countries they have a position. we have another level called secret diplomacy and our secret diplomacy in iraq in doha, qatar and in the us. it was held in different historical eras. these discussions were mostly with the americans, and in a way , it was an effort to determine what share we should get from the jcpoa and what commitment we should fulfill within the framework of the jcpoa. the fact is that after the withdrawal of the united states from the jcpoa, serious challenges

arose for iran's economy. the americans expect us to be accountable to our obligations to the agency and to link the lifting of sanctions to a a two-sided issue. what iran did was to fulfill its obligations, especially regarding the additional protocol and the issue of inspections. the second point is that he improved the process of uranium enrichment, that is, it reached 60%. americans feel that they are in a state of danger and threat. that is, their argument was that if iran continues this process, it may be on the threshold of nuclear power. america was here. which always dealt from a high position

, when iran increased its capabilities , it was the united states that asked for negotiations, and part of these negotiations took place in a bilateral or trilateral situation. the aspect based on the participation of the host country was achieved, so this process is a very representative process. expand cooperation with european countries and, in parallel , improve the level of cooperation with russia and china within the framework of shanghai, as well as bilateral relations . we had applied for years and were accepted as an observer member of shanghai. yes,

last year, the ground was created for iran to be accepted as an official member, but there is one point. why are we still not enjoying all the benefits of shanghai? because the americans imposed sanctions, which imposed restrictions it occurs for some countries, including russia and china. this is where iran put the policy of orientation to the east on the agenda. i think a kind of politics. several branches and branches emerged in the field of iranian diplomacy, and i am sure that the process that took place during the era of ayatollah raisi in the field of foreign policy for official bilateral negotiations

, multilateral official negotiations, leaving behind hidden diplomacy and organizational diplomacy as it is known, was formed from this. in the future, it will continue with the same strength . we hope to continue this discussion. we will be a permanent member during the presidency of mr. recently , we experienced meetings between the presidents of countries for the first time, many trips were made, many achievements were made, and many events in the field of foreign policy were brought about during this era. but we had the widespread participation of the people in the 14th presidential election period, which led to the election of the doctor in charge as

the elected president. in the progress he had achieved and of course in the future in better situations other improvements will be made. look , our political structure is based on the people, both the supreme leader and the imam have always emphasized that the people are the main source of national power, some countries' national power is based on technology, some on the economy, some on the militarism of iran . it was this: that a situation should be formed in this new election process where the society and social groups are present. why? because the idea of ​​political construction of basic people and basic society

is important because it gives strength and legitimacy it gives identity to the behavioral pattern. in a way , the leaders and the political system here had this mentality that some manifestations of political blockage have formed and there is no scope for, for example, the participation of competing political groups. the fact is that the election showed the alternation of elites, what vilfredo pareto made in connection with brings up political issues and pays attention to the fact that the elites must have the ability to gather and continue

. diplomacy two on the other hand , it is on the agenda in relation to the expansion of relations with the international system, and we are witnessing that the congratulatory messages given to dr. mezikian show that there is a desire to expand cooperation and this desire. the remarkable part is related to the fact that iran has achieved a strategic power and a regional deterrence capability. when the infrastructure of a country's power and power support is improved, in

that situation, diplomacy can take a good path, the path of seeking cooperation. iran has always been in all historical eras negotiation, cooperation and bilateral and multilateral commitments in some way. supported and welcomed. the fact is that the americans felt that diplomacy , which many iranian agents felt, was a kind of untying of iran's strategic fields. put the policy of reciprocity on the agenda

for iran, it doesn't matter whether it is mr. rouhani, mr. raisi, or mr. bizikian, in strategic fields, all these people put the policy of threat against threat on the agenda, and this the problem shows that there is a strategic consensus in iran regarding the macro policies of the country , mr. dr. motaghi . we look at the scenarios of western media and western persian language media , we see that they wanted to impress people that they are ineffective. they are ineffective in holding the elections, and of course, the important issue that

they always follow in many different elections is boycotting elections, boycotting participation in elections. when we look at the statistics of the two holding periods, we see that the same point that you mentioned, the system of the people is the basis of strong social capital , which always makes the islamic republic successful in various fields, that is, the people. why follow this , as opposed to never getting any results from it and still failing in this case? look, we have two approaches in the atmosphere of election competitions. these two approaches are one manifesto related to iran, which has 4 indicators, one participation the competition of three health and four security discussion first. this manifesto is related to the partnership, when the partnership is formed, when the competition

to exist in this period of the presidential election competition, the competition was very serious. we had candidates and each of these candidates had a speech. this discourse could be an inspiration for social groups. but this society placed 40% of the basic qualifications in the first stage of the election funds , it showed that during that period the polarized society was not peaceful in the second stage to the extent that the number of candidates decreased, the ground for polarization was polarized. there was a peaceful settlement, of course , there were immoralities on the part of some headquarters

it was assumed that naturally the society did not pay attention to these issues, these immoralities could have left their impact on the participation, but the atmosphere in a polar state of participation and polarity in the second stage generally increased in the scale of the stage. first and secondly

, addressing a wider range of social space means that it showed that the society needed a kind of electoral shock . order of expectations of generation groups. the main ones may not have been fully considered : identity groups, language groups, religious groups, and so on a problem of one kind. and it created a gap that , in my opinion, the election created a shock that restored a kind of solidarity within the framework of the participation fund and the interactive action of society and political institutions, and of course, contrary to the scenarios that they tried to turn into reality and failed. sir

, of course, the international media, just as we see participation and competition as a sign of power, they also try to reduce participation and show that there is no such thing as competitive action , while the reality is that at least in the same period of election competition that somehow citizens iranians were beaten when they wanted to vote abroad. it was people's participation, and what happened abroad in connection with those who wanted to vote, with the principles of democracy, with the principles of democratic action, with the principles

of human action, we should see a report about the same issues that we talked about in the studio. we talked, let's go back, mrs. sharifeh, a reporter of the sada vasima news agency, joined us. usually, when we go to the battlefield , we take a bulletproof vest with us, but here we had to bring an anti-explosion vest with us, why on the 15th of july 1403 iranian voters residing outside the subversives and royalists heard a common question : did you go and vote?

outside the country, you pass through this obscene crowd to vote. you are so hot, royalists and subversives, for disturbing more, don't, don't , don't, take the video, even from the license plate, the pictures of the faces of the people, and even the addresses of the voters , they didn't let me tell them their car numbers, and they even injured some of them in this way to iranians abroad who, despite threats, insults and intimidation of voting , i will eat copteh in return.

your heartbeat is the sacrifice of your regret and hope of taking back the iranian flag from the persian speaking people who this iranian man this is what he says about them , who cut the throat of freedom in the name of freedom and cut the neck of humanity in the name of humanity. these are the people who stand behind each other in defense of iran, who seek to divide iran. do not be fooled by these animals. let's talk about mrs. izad's report and of course the content production that we

had on the voting day in both periods of the 14th presidential election in the virtual space. doing as we did, as the bbc reporter said here, if you want to vote, you have to wear an anti-blasphemy vest, and this was an example in the real world. doing this with all this now, the representative of the country's election headquarters told iranians abroad that if we want to compare, the second round of voter participation from outside

iran is four times more than in the previous presidential election in 1400, which shows that with all this, shut them up and these harassments are so much. failing and now. cyberspace, i said that the anti -revolutionary groups that we saw in the real space deal with our compatriots outside of our country , insulting and far from freedom of expression in the cyberspace, based on the data mining provided to us by the national center of cyberspace said that from from the 8th to the 15th of july , between the first and the second round of election boycott campaigns. that these dialects have appeared in 3 social networks . one is social network x or the former twitter, instagram and telegram. on x

, 17,000 pages a day, in this one week of being active , they posted an average of 2 posts a day with what content and what hashtags. hashtag "bir vote stay at home" election boycott. they used to insult and even insult people. abolition creates an atmosphere of polarization and mistrust, so that if you vote badly, it will not have any effect. so far, there have been 17,000 tweets, 34,000 tweets in this one week, just because you didn't come to vote. now, what about the instagram social network ? now, because it's a story , they couldn't read the story, those data mining systems couldn't calculate the stories. do it, and only those pages that were on instagram posted 563 posts, and now there are groups on my telegram network that

are active on 3 thousand channels in one week so that people don't vote in the second round, and the content of each of these has 45 views. it has a million views, so now i said the second round, what about the first round, yes and for a minute, ms. sharifi, manage your time. yes , in the first round of the election. the imam, the spokesman of the national center , said that 75% of these groups produced content that increased people's anger with the aim of reducing participation in the elections, that they wanted people not to vote, and from the collection of 100% of the content that was published in cyberspace, mining in the section in the first round, which was between june 27th and july 6th, 75% of our content production was offensive behavior, behavior that was not based on morals and was based on fake news, although we have these campaigns during elections in the world, which are known as jalali news. and spreading false information with the aim

of polarization and distorting the reality, but in no country, but if we check the social networks and the world, no country has faced this volume of election boycott distortion campaigns, thank you very much fatima shirley khabar. it was not a social act. in other words, it was a security action. security action has two dimensions.

it reduces a security factor for voters. two, the purpose of that action is to put some kind of psychological and behavioral pressure on him. people who want to vote for the body. there is a time some people are against iran's policies, social policies, cultural policies, economic policies, both inside the country and abroad, they can speak their words and approaches freely. but there is a time when you see a project. this project to press. it is social groups and you can see that the atmosphere becomes security

, which means that the society will be shocked. the so-called social space to put iran on the agenda means to say , well, if a person ever wanted. vote freely and defend your social rights in some way and say, sir, i like to vote or i don't like to vote, now i want to vote for this person , i want to vote for another person, that is, they wanted security in the space of democratic action. to put pressure on them, and for this reason, we witnessed that

they were creating some kind of conflicts in order for that policy of pressure and pressure to create a kind of intimidation that would minimize the level of participation , but the reality was that the iranian spirit thought iranians and iranian will abroad played a stronger, more accurate and more effective role in the election atmosphere . we have about 3 minutes until the end. let me talk about the french elections. now, at the same time as the elections in the islamic republic, a few days ago, we had the french parliamentary elections. islamic iran, the election was held in safety and security, the results were announced

, we had an analysis about this issue, the fact is that in space. iran's elections, we have elections in england in france, we had the english mind, a quiet control mind of the british police, and an approach of creating deterrence in order not to create collisions, but unfortunately, among democratic and european countries , the french police. the most violent of all. we know the reason for the brutality of the french police in some way in the social structure and the pattern of protests of rival groups. there is an anti-immigrant wave in france. a wave, as the famous french saying goes, has formed that they are always looking for that.

create restrictions for other groups, so the social construction of france is a strong objection to the construction of security and the level of violence of the french police is much higher compared to england, that is why in france we saw social conflicts with the police , while this situation in england seemed completely different to me. thank you very much, mr. dr. ebrahim motaghi, expert and analyst. political issues and members of the academic faculty of the university , i say goodbye to you and thank you for your presence. thank you to fatemeh sharifah, a reporter of sada vasima news agency, who came to our meeting tonight by phone. as always , i am grateful for your good company. good night and god bless you.

traditional religious rites in the month of muharram for several years , it has been held in hosseiniyeh of barbaric martyrs in qaim shahr neighborhood for mohammad hossein janam hossein jan. they are giving to pay for the mourning of mr. aba abdullah al-hussein