in the same mechanism , it has been said in this way, mr. shariati, and it is going to happen that when the indicators, capabilities, and management metrics that i am presenting now are checked, under equal conditions , there are some positive discriminations in all parts of my world. why is it against historical discrimination, that is, if we say women, because there is a history that women have not been used properly in positions, if we say sunnis , because they have not been used properly in terms of the population, in equal conditions, when two people had similar points, that is positive discrimination that score will help us decide what to do to compensate for this historical discrimination. with this positive discrimination , i ask everyone to pay attention to this issue. and

let us help you once this happens correctly and competently . for example, if we put 10 points for age, that means a positive score for people under 50 years old, or for a positive score for women or religious and religious minorities, 10 points. and, for example, knowing the mission of the device. the way and ability to solve the problem of good reputation in the specialized field, having a successful achievement in one or more subjects at the macro national level, this is 10 points then you have personal capabilities, responsibility , professional ethics, belief in professional work , decision-making skills, communication skills , perceptive skills, attitude and strategic approach, people management , performance management. the ability to lead a commercial candle, see

all this, or accept the president's attitude in the area at that time, see the area. cultivators of convergence, harmony and internal cohesion , individualism and meritocracy, resistance, flexibility external interaction, one by one, it has points in the parameters that are being evaluated now , so it is right to point out that all these things must have been thought about now when entering into this arrangement, friends, and i assure my friends that they should trust, of course, the deceased. the teacher has a sentence saying good work.

i believe that this work is one of the good things because we can do it well. any work that happens for the first time in this volume, we must be sure that there are iranians who should eventually help these iranians, especially me. from dear people, please remember that you are supposed to help the government, one of the help is demand. the cry of demanding fair criticism, if the government forgets to rely on you, mr. dr. mezikian, the president-elect , having a sentence the day after the victory, saying, "i won't leave you alone, and you won't be left alone either . " of course, in all periods , there is the issue of asking for shares during the selection of cabinet members. but this

period according to the warnings raised by leading reformist figures or reformist media it seems that the warning about this share is a bit bolder . what do you know about the reason? now, of course, mr. taratari , explain this. now i will ask him. our decision making should be the law . well, the constitution is actually our national covenant. in the constitution, general terms and conditions for the administration of the country are provided. naturally , we are all here based on the constitution and we are following the issues in particular. the basic principles of the constitution, the general terms and conditions of the country's administration he made it clear to us, not in the principles of the constitution, not in the general policies, not in the religious teachings, everything that is the basis of the system of our islamic republic, and even in the literature

is a political literature. see, in the scientific literature of the world, in this discussion, there are evaluation centers and now i have to name them. there is a scientific literature on these at all. this work has been done in the world for years and decades. in our country, by the way , there are good companies and evaluation centers in this field . they also provide good services in different periods. in my opinion, they should be invited. in the set of these committees that we have, we look at prominent scientific people doing this work is a scientific work . someone who has been a minister before cannot be a good evaluator. why is the person who was a minister , because he is experienced, he can predict the model well , he can give some comments, he can put forward some propositions, but surely someone should do this work or at least be part of the evaluation team , who is familiar with the literature of minerals. evaluations are familiar in the world and in our country, for example, this

is not positive discrimination at all. if a scientific reference, a scientific source on this subject is presented, i really take back my words. we really do not have such a thing. yes, in the literature. it is political. there is scientific literature in the world, this is not true. i mentioned it later. yes, i agree. if we evaluate two people based on the same skills, knowledge, and personality abilities, we arrive at two people with almost equal scores. very well, if it was a noble lady. if we use it, what 's wrong with it, but if we give it a score in advance, then the score should be higher. later, he went to work and couldn't do the job. we want to give it to the people , the same people who are now our dear friend's audience , and they are the audience of all of us, and they demand from all of us. and they expect from the parliament that based on we should evaluate the features, indicators, efficiency, capabilities, and health. therefore, in my opinion, we should not turn a political issue into a social issue that

we can actually use for advertising later. in my opinion , this is not the right thing to do . in the law, there is actually no requirement for the president. the president is not the one to announce his evaluation index at all, the law says this , the civil service management law, which is the basis, i say , the law is the law for us. article 71 enumerates the political officials , said the heads of the three branches of parliament, ministers , governors, deputy ministers, these are political officials. of course, in my note, some other political officials also said that the cabinet will later determine that this work has been done in the past . the same law said that i should read the election from the beginning because it is an important issue. it said that the election to remove the appointment of these people is in

article 54 of the civil service management law. the authority of a higher authority, that is, the president, is like the people's system. the dictator gets his power from the people, and the people get him he has the right to vote. in fact , he can choose his colleagues, the senior managers of his government, that is , my doctor can go to a school and find a capable teacher who has no experience, for example, a general manager, and say, "i want to introduce this." the ministry of education has authority. if the parliament votes, he is a minister. the authority of the higher authority here is that the president can nominate , the parliament can vote, he can go find someone, for example, a good carpenter, and say, "i will appoint a minister. there is no problem with the law." there is no problem, but when we come, we will discuss the indicators we have to go and do it in the scientific literature , so here it is entirely up to the honorable president to do this for his colleagues. on the side

of the reformists, it is sometimes mentioned . what is the reason? of course, some people say that maybe the reason is that the selection of cabinet members is left to the people around them and to committees and working groups. see, first of all, it is not entrusted to me to correct a group of experts, mr. shariati also pointed out yes, some of these friends who are in the working group of the committees and are in the working group, these are the ones who run the evaluation centers in the country, that is, they are responsible for evaluation and grading and setting indicators for. different administrations in the country during the past years, this is a really specialized professional work that is being done by these friends, so i would like to say this, let your service be announced with them , for sure, the majority of it has been announced, the steering council has been announced, the committees have been announced most of

his and my friends are now starting to think about me and thank you for this procedure. to make it clear, see mr. shariati. he did a good job, this was in the hands of one person , in addition to the fact that in different eras , it was in the hands of a group formed by the president , he told four people. sir, please comment on this. now this has been opened at the level of about 500 people , the subject is experts in their fields, they are former ministers. those who work in that field. some of the scientific institutions, you know, that the highest number of participation was taken from them, and the participation in this participation are scientific associations and non-governmental organizations that were consulted in this course and

i want to say that this is the first time that this is happening in scientific societies that have never had any connection at all, and this has happened . it is happening in most of the committees and working groups because there are so many diverse people in it. the committee and these people have minimized the possibility of this happening. if there are any objections, i will say this. i will take this as a good omen. but the point is that this is part of the fight and if things are said, that's it sir, why is there a more skilled person instead of this person who is also capable? for example, why didn't he get a higher score or are friends talking about this? i want to say that my request is

that this process will continue in the coming nights in order to clarify the issue of more specialized friends that they have about the same issues that they said . the first is in the cabinet. in every cabinet, if political justice is observed, it means in appointing the main assistants of the president in the cabinet we can hope that political justice will prevail in the rest of the affairs. the statement you made about positive discrimination or reverse discrimination has also been raised in different eras in the work on the issue of political justice in the world. now i ask that different friends explain about this issue later. this

is happening once and for all, let's all help and accompany people so that people understand that if a president is found who talks about political justice , he will replace the experts instead of polls and circles , and finally, i will say that the president himself has the authority. republics, but these consultative working groups. great help tomorrow, we can rest easy in most of this cabinet and ministries , there were people who at least had more luck from the elites of that field and the experts of that field . these are hope for the future and the trust of the people . that people find the president who did not make such promises. he did not say two figures, people trust that honesty and

in any case that model of the elected president, we hope that this will continue. now, there is another point that i will raise as a criticism, it is the issue of conflict of interest that may happen because they say that because you these working groups or committees have specific contributions for different guilds or for different political groups , it is possible that these are in that discussion. at your service, in any case, there is this branch, if someone thinks that he can see potential in himself and other people

will be selected. but in the end, after all these committees and working groups do their work, it comes to the upper council, which part of what you said can be reviewed again. it has the final stage, which is the elected president himself, who wants the installed president after the inauguration. let them decide that there is a place for this kind of bullying in order to solve these problems, that's why i say that people should have their demands. in any case, two or three sources of communication have been introduced, who can send emails or tell their content, and the same monitoring method will be carried out until the last stage, in my opinion , with this mechanism that has been seen, with the least losses and waste, i hope to god, an achievement will be achieved. i say good , let's meet again for the first time, everyone help

me so that, god willing, mr. shariati will be more successful next time. this may further overshadow the work of parliamentarians in discussing the vote of confidence . are you critical of this or do you reject this? look, of course, i have to say that because mr. teh said this is being done for the first time , at least my servant is an example of violating this order. a working group was formed for the field of energy, and in one of the meetings that i had the opportunity to attend , maybe 20 experts in this field were

present, and by the way, those who have experience in evaluation work in these fields were present. people who are present even when they are appointed as the ministry of home affairs, they express their points , their views, their plans , their strategies, and people have judgments that they later pass on to the person in charge of that team. it was one of the meetings, and i was present in the government of shahid raees at the beginning, and by the way , the interaction of his government with the parliament was also better, and now none of the commissions and the parliament are involved in this issue, regardless of their political views . from the specialized area of ​​the parliamentary commissions, they are very effective in understanding what those priorities are, especially now that we have the seventh plan, which this government wants to be present from the beginning of its implementation, and the table that is actually the chart that is now one of the problems with the structure that mr. dr. zarif published in the virtual space was that many of the structures that

were modified or deleted or integrated in the 7th plan have not been seen at all, that is, in the articles of the program law that i know, a new structure has been created in the 7th plan, and by the way, the things that have been seen now they shouldn't be something new. they should see this. by the way , i think that consulting in these specialized areas will help friends who don't spend time on a path to make a mistake so that they can do it later because we don't have time to take a test. make a mistake and let's correct it. the next point is because i'm a handyman myself in light of this debate, i did evaluation work , i was successful in a course of the industrial management organization , i also received evaluation training, and i participated in the evaluation of one of the most important organizations in the country. there is a long list of different indicators, read mr. tabatabi, which is all correct, but if there are 30 indicators, it cannot be evaluated at all . as a rule, different devices have different indicators. these should be separated from each other, four or five are

general, 56 are specialized, and let it be known that the assessors those who want to evaluate who they are are tools. it turns out that after all, the tools have a psychological test, the currency of this width, in fact , the tools are a simulation model. suppose someone wants to be a minister , he can do a critical management in the country. they give him a problem, they say that something has happened, for example, in a certain power plant, what do you want to do now, so that he can manage it and be able to respond, and those people who are there are actually 10, 12 indicators, in fact, there are 56. we have evaluators and four or five tools, for example we have an assessment that these cannot be removed from this situation. if we want to implement this model, if it is not a scientific model, then the political model is in the hands of the president, it is in the hands of his team, and no one can take away the president with any model, with any means. i said, the president has discretion. it is perfect because the constitution gave this authority, the people gave this authority to vote, and the people are dead. this is the religious year

. the president, once he has taken his power from the people and his legitimacy from the leadership, can go and start and do his work, but if we claim . it will be announced as soon as it is announced first, whether this cabinet is the original cabinet or not, secondly, it will be known. based on what mechanism these people are selected, because the output of any process also shows the method to reach that output, naturally, if we see a strong ministry of selection in the framework of policies . from the point of view of this government, naturally we will definitely help , definitely support, definitely strengthen so that the work of the people can be done, the work of the country can be done . anyway, we

had an unsuccessful experience in the 90s, when inefficiency prevailed in the country, and we don't want this to happen again. effective if they are introduced with different political views from us we will definitely support them, efficient and healthy people , because for us these two important characteristics are efficiency and health, naturally, the parliament pays attention to the constitution, the parliament pays attention to general policies, the parliament pays attention to the health and ability of people, and now this ability and in fact, health has different components. the issue of proper interaction with the parliament should not be such that a minister comes to the podium and allows himself to say, for example, i will hire some representatives in the same way. later, he will actually give concessions and take concessions and then ask for them. for example , if a vote is taken like this, the parliament will definitely get rid of this he will not come with these unhealthy debates and unhealthy actions , of course, that servant of god said that we gave the points to the previous ones, not to these current representatives. he ordered and ate a lot and

came to give him a receipt. he said , "aren't you counting with my grandson?" he said, "that receipt is 90. later, this big daddy has already eaten. i have to say, later, this is related to each other. this shouldn't happen. these unhealthy interactions shouldn't happen." befete with the majlis and definitely the seventh program is a feature for us it is important how much the minister who is introduced actually is. he considers himself bound to implement the law, if possible , the honorable government's review and evaluation is that , for example, a part of the program is not applicable, which mr. doctors said that i cannot achieve 88 %. the task of the 7th plan cannot be realized. you must submit an amendment bill to the parliament, otherwise we will demand that it be realized completely considering that it is also a general policy. the parliament is completely independent and based on proper interaction and to help advance the work of the country

he will support strong, efficient and healthy ministers . very good, thank you very much. we have less than a week. now, we can give two summaries for both nobles, or i can ask another question for you to answer. i am happy that our dear brother mr. shariati is gone. before the meeting of the parliament, they came to the conclusion that the government should comply with these things that they said, because i am sorry to say that in the last 3 years, this part of these things that they are already predicting the future and saying should not happen. to they are right, it happened in the last three years , unfortunately, the reason is that people are different in one way and another. others voted, it's very clear , there's no need for length and detail, i want to say that all the things you said

are included in this measure and criteria, and god willing, they will be observed, mr. doctor , their characteristic is that they don't make promises , because they point out, i mean if it's not going to happen , you know what this will cause, it will cause people to die. don't be disappointed, don't be disappointed , we all saw the experience of one hand in all affairs once and understood that with the promise giving with spatial numbers is not going to solve anything . i'm asking you, friends of the parliament, because mr. shariati is also here. now, i 'm asking you to invite your friends tomorrow , and mr. shariati himself, if he wants to see these arrangements, because all of them are him. they say and rightly point out that it has been observed and that it is scientific . they also emphasize on the field of political justice. the focal point of the speech of mr. dr. bizikian was justice

. to the discrimination that i saw you and other friends have mentioned it many times, i say this is the third chapter of the constitution. the nation is a very good and attractive chapter and i read its 20th principle . once , we have nothing better than the constitution to summarize. all the people of imam's nation, men and women alike, are under the protection of the law , respecting all human rights, political, economic, social and cultural. the standards of islam didn't say what their orientations are, they didn't say what their religion is, they said that all 89 million iranians are the same, the same, the same, the positive discrimination is the same in the protection of the law, do you know why positive discrimination?

the 20th principle is not observed in the case of many people you see many times the leadership of the revolution mentioned about the employment of those whose rights have been lost. if the medical doctors are now emphasizing this and their consultants are emphasizing this and the mechanism is based on this, i have once again presented it to you. because some of our friends are used to making sentences with leadership phrases. in this government, one of the things that can be implemented is the rights of minorities, the rights of women are respected. for everyone, iran is one of the regions that really needs to be defended yes, please, sada vasima and friends. those who

claim to follow the leadership should stand by this position so that all 89 million iranians can taste the true justice. let the people taste political justice, and so will i. i would like to say that i would like to thank the radio and television and the procedure it has taken on the condition that it continues at different levels. i would also like to ask my friends and other experts that we are not the only ones who we can come let's talk about the 50% whose voices were not heard and who insist that their voices be heard. i request sada and vasima, as a media that

is supposed to be for all people, to invite them to attend and my comments are from you, mr. shariati, your excellency. look at the summary, i had exactly the same opinion. you see, the constitution talks about justice and equal rights, and if we want to do something political somewhere, we are not supposed to violate the constitution. when it says equal, it means equal. by the way, this is exactly what they say in trump it is easy for us to give the points first and then draw let's choose, i mentioned this, in the equal condition of the points, what mr. zarif said was that we will give the points first, that is, why what you said on the same tv, people heard again, saying first 10 points if it was a woman, 10 points if it was a man, zero if it was a shiite, zero non-shia 10 points this is against the constitution, the twelfth principle, it needs to be explained, this

is not the model that you actually represented and are doing , mr. khatami's government, mr. rouhani's government did not appoint any female minister, by the way, mr. ahmadnejad's government did , it happened for the first time, there is no problem with us. we agree, it means that this happens, we agree surely a worthy person, an efficient person will come based on the evaluations that are done, if there are even 10, what's wrong, but we definitely have to answer later, if there is inefficiency, based on what model he chose the people, that's important, 30 seconds , the next point i will make at the end i want to tell you that the reality is that it is a very big task. an important

thing has happened in the country, especially in the second stage , finally, an increase in participation compared to the first stage has created hope in the country, and this gives a promise for the future, but there are people who have played a role in this decrease in participation since 2008, which is now are present in the steering committees of the government . really, if we declare that we accept the principles of the constitution and the principle of the province, then the leadership saying sedition is our red line, and the people who are involved in sedition are now respected and main members of the steering council working groups. we invite you to accept our invitation to participate in the special conversation program to talk more about this issue. thank you for watching. good night.