these follow-ups were supposed to be able to pass a law in less than a week. all this will have an effect. the effect of this last sentence was the effect of this on the people's livelihood. what you see is that the supreme leader regards this law as a good law and it is very good to remember that hundreds of thousands of people need mr. khosravi radio daru because it was effective in people's livelihood 67 was our enrichment. for some of these radio-medicines and medical reasons and radiations, sometimes we had to have a few 10% enrichment. on the one hand, americans and europeans did not let us do this. from they don't give me the other side. therefore, it was effective here in livelihood, that is, in people's health. in agriculture, we use these in production.

we use agricultural products to increase productivity. well, we didn't have these. this law was effective in people's livelihood. our farmers used it, productivity in the country increased, our hospitals were saved, and in addition to all this, our oil sales. its context has been found . with this law, the sale of oil has an effect on people's livelihood or not. you finally want to buy a product therefore, the fact that you see that the supreme leader of the parliament was encouraged, it goes back to the type of move that was made. if you are in the mood for a discussion , please let me know why our government sought to appease president rouhani. that if he gives time and has time

, he can convince the americans , convince the europeans, the europeans, the americans have come to the conclusion that the iranians do not take any action, they do not have the power to take action, this law is in the hands of the country's parliament and our diplomacy. and shahid raisi's government happened to be after that period this capacity was used more than the previous government , which you later asked for an explanation. thank you very much , dear sir. now, the research works at different levels were carried out for this law, because now you mention that it was caused within a week. now, i forgot the name of the research center. i will also bring the members of the parliament because they are also very important players and now that we are talking about the benefits of this law after it was passed, is it what we expected from the approval of this law and the reaction that now , for example, the europeans or

it had a dimension towards iran, did it happen, that is, them did they find out that the islamic republic is retaliating? look, mr. khosravi, in relation to the research before this law , yes, as you mentioned, the research center worked on this law. many experts and experts in the field. all the provisions of this law were made with expert opinion . now mr. moqtadaei , basically, this law was formed based on the approval of the supreme national security council . when did we see that islamic iran and

dear nation, take the necessary benefit from this law it has not been completed and on the other hand , our nuclear industry has also suffered damage, the discussion of enrichment and many issues that we were looking for in the nuclear field have stopped. undoubtedly, this law has the logic that in order to achieve the economic benefits of the nuclear industry and the growth of this industry, we had to do this action with the expert bases of all these materials of this law. if i tell you that during the weeks, numerous experts coming to this law or even

its words, we had disagreements even in the commission on this period of time that we want to give, but all of these finally come to this, where we have to do the same. as mentioned, we must take a decisive action to see if the islamic republic and our country have benefited from this law . today, our nuclear industry itself has grown. that today we have many of our needs, we are following this path, that basically we proved that the parties to the negotiation and the jcpoa are renegades, they cannot be relied upon

, all of these have different achievements in the political, social, cultural, economic and security fields without a doubt. this law to the government. both the current government and the subsequent government gave this help, let it be open to provide national interests. if you look at each of these clauses and articles of the law, you will see exactly that it will remove the restrictions and help the growth and development of this industry and the economic benefit of the country by removing this. to provide restrictions, wasn't it supposed to be with the approval of this law, with the signing of this law, in fact, on the same day that this agreement is signed , all the sanctions will be nullified completely, what

happened, did we witness something? i did in the first part. we had 750 sanctions, we had the same in the national security commission, we were investigating the same , gentlemen, they said that now it has reached 1,500 sanctions, the meaning of which is that basically, the demands of negotiations are not only looking for economic benefits . we have said that coins and items will be canceled on the day the jcpoa comes into effect. that he does not want to look for something special. our people are witnesses. which

one of these was canceled? which one of these could you actually show in the lives of your own people? yes, we came to water the people. we also tied to this decision but we witnessed in practice that not only did nothing happen, but also serious damage was done . how much of this law is a strategic action that you said was not done and could be reversed ? anyway, you must know that our oil sales today are very good conditions. today , our hands are more open in terms of our economic goals. today , it is part of the restrictions that some countries have imposed on us. because of witnessing that the opposite parties do not have those restrictions with us, our hands are now open for many economic purposes, this law also helped. the progress of our nuclear industry has actually shown that

the countries facing us, especially the negotiating parties , are looking for bad faith. and as soon as he showed that , naturally, we should look for national interests and our national interests are in this direction , thank you for this law, mr. zahrovand, respected member of the islamic council. it draws a strategy for our country's nuclear issues and securing iran's national interests, and it is said that this leaves the governments open for negotiation or their hands. how does it happen? does it fall? in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, greetings to your excellency, as well as my dear colleagues in the parliament , mr. azizi, mr. moqtadaei, and dear viewers of the program

. i have to say that, first of all , negotiation is a means, not a goal. this is a very important point that there were some gentlemen who were actually negotiating for the sake of negotiation, which was a mistake. another point was that we had a different approach at the negotiating table. the american side was afraid that actually through nuclear negotiations reach the community negotiations, i.e. jcpoa 1, 2, 3 and 4, while iran is the target. in the end, it was only about the nuclear issue, so we went and signed the jcpoa and

fulfilled those commitments, and we saw that there was no way out for us, and it led to increased sanctions and pressure, so this was a confirmation. another point is that we had experience in negotiations that in the 9th and 10th governments, we happened to use the same capacity of the parliament, and when we sat at the negotiating table, this lever and this position of the parliament was a factor in not allowing them to bridge the nuclear issue to other issues, i.e. missile issues, regional issues, and even finally human rights issues and the enforcement of this created space for us and we easily said that we came here to discuss nuclear negotiations and even if we wanted to, we would react to this position. and we will face the parliament. it is from this angle that hazrat agha also mentions that this

strategic law would have left the hands of the negotiators free rather than trying to create restrictions for them. i heard one of these gentlemen say that this law led us to war we saw that nothing happened and the most interesting thing was this that we now had trump who was kicked under the table and withdrew from the jcpoa, now a government that wants to sit at the negotiating table with the loss of confrontation , this law will definitely help it and support it in order not to allow the side to choose the nuclear path enter another path and this brought us national security. now, regardless of the subsequent events , i want to say from this point of view that the law of action was a very appropriate step in the direction of providing national interests to the nuclear negotiating team, if it they also believed that, firstly, the purpose

of negotiation is not to negotiate, and secondly, it should not be allowed the other party wants to be aware of this scope and be aware that it can have the same function for possible negotiations in the future . in my opinion, this law is actually a scientific trend. . we also tested this in the istanbul negotiations, even if it's for your sake and the respectable viewers, we were at a point when the americans themselves expressed this issue that they cannot put more pressure on iran because it is only a matter of nuclear energy and the trend towards production. deviation from nuclear issues is not for pti but for the nation iran's nuclear issue has an identity, and we saw that a human chain was formed next to some sites in isfahan, which proved that the society stands united and

has achieved 45 years of nuclear energy and nuclear technology as one. and the resistance is reminding him, so he moderated them until we the people are on the same side and the opposite side thinks that yes, the pressure has affected iran, now iran has come to give points, these are two different paths and definitely the law of strategic action. in my opinion, the parliament is one of the honors of the parliament, but it was also a deterrent this factor also caused negotiations to be held in the government of mr. raisi, but the negotiations could not deviate from the right path according to what the americans wanted to move towards other discussions . we made the biggest mistake by mr. trump.

if the strategic action law was not passed to cancel the sanctions, trump would have returned to the jcpoa in 2020. what do you think, do you think this will happen? well, let's face it now, maybe he wouldn't have been that day, we can know now that time has passed let's analyze, see americans and europeans. the entire western group is on our side in order to take the interests of the iranian nation, they also say that you should give concessions, we gave concessions, but we cannot sell our oil, we cannot do bank transactions, the government promised the nation that if i leave i will come to the conclusion and the wheel of your life will turn, but this

did not happen, there was a problem, and that was that the government was entrusted with a passivity in the face of external pressures. the title of a teacher i'm teaching foreign policy at the university and i'm talking about international organizations. i saw that this was happening. our colleagues used to rely on that side . if you don't have it , because you look at the israelis, the occupying regime, they are coming to assassinate, when the iranian drones and iranian missiles went and hit their areas , they understand that here, they realized that iran has power , if it ever speaks, if it threatens, if its own do you have patience, this is strategic patience to some extent, it was the same here, that is, we

used to say diplomacy, but from the other side. we didn't have the power to do this. on the other hand , they wanted to bomb iran's behavioral logic, and when you have diplomacy without your support, the formation of a security threat to iran will happen . let's solve it. the parliament came and entered this space. you asked a question about the effect of this law. was it in the trends or did it come true at all or not? let me answer this. you can see the season of negotiations in vienna. you have seen the 8th. before, the americans said that they were not willing to negotiate, even trump left , the democrats came, the democrats were not in a hurry to negotiate, but when iran

reached a higher mine based on the same law, they got motivated and worried. mr. zahrovand brinken says that we, for example, assume that what we did in exiting the jcpoa or the pressures we brought did not achieve results, and a policy has failed since this policy failed, and the law of the strategic action of the parliament was in the hands of the government of men. and they knew this as a bond in fact, if someone transgresses. it has been criminalized to take this seriously and before that the five steps that you mentioned are not taken seriously at all . the next thing i want to point out here is the new generation centrifuges that you have brought . it happened as a result of this law

, we reached the 60% mine as a result of this great law. before, they said that you should have 367. as a result of our previous threats that we were 5%, they don't believe that within less than a month or about a month after the approval of this law in the parliament, we will reach 60%. the percentage of my investigation first denied, the scientists said it was not possible, but then it was seen, because we invited the international nuclear energy agency, we said, come and see, all our work is peaceful, all our work is based on international regulations, and if you see, the supreme leader is referring they say that this law is a good law, the reason is the benefits it brings to the people. i said before, look here, we should

have done the uranium storage, now we have this under the agency's supervision. the americans tried our every kind of move more than 3.67 or 5 they say that it is against the non-proliferation treaty. while the non-referral treaty itself allows the member states to take whatever percentage they need in peaceful contexts. this law is the strategic action of the taboo that the americans created and iran is isolated , iran is an isolated taffeta . now, especially, the government after president rouhani's government used it, so it made its preparations , or the access that we had said, we

will give you access to the voluntary agency. there is no reason for you to take a step for the benefit of the iranian nation because those steps were not taken for the benefit of the iranian nation. our knowledge is indigenous knowledge, our scientists were martyred in this direction so that we could reach this point. and the irreversibility of the open path is the point that came as a result of this case. let me summarize in one sentence. this law also had technical achievements for us. that the heads of the nuclear energy organization several times in our commission. mr. azizi also came and confirmed this recent meeting a few days ago, we had a meeting in which the head of nuclear energy was the head of nuclear energy. again, this point was emphasized that

as a result of this law , we were able to move forward both in the political and technical fields. this is an example because our diplomacy must be active. our negotiations must be continuous and we will move in this direction, but our other side must recognize us. i said the last sentence , i will also say another sentence. look, in these negotiations, it is time to go to vienna from 1 to 8, which were held in these negotiations until the final stage. it also went ahead, but two or three global events happened, one was the issue of ukraine, the other was an issue the failure of the americans to not allow us to reach this conclusion should be taken into consideration . during the campaign for the presidential election, we also heard that it was sometimes raised that if this law was not an act of the leadership of the parliament or opposition to, for example, the zionist regime, we could

have revived the nuclear deal even if we had to. mr. azizi, give me more time, why didn't this happen a year and a half ago, you had time to do this a year and a half ago , it didn't happen, so it didn't happen since then. being in the parliament, with the help of the country's diplomacy, we have 3 minutes at the disposal of mr. saleh. well, unfortunately , during the election campaigns, we saw some statements that i think were not correct statements. some gentlemen came to announce during the election campaigns that if the law of this i want the sentence here, if

it was not for the strategic action law of the islamic council and the opposition of the zionist regime, this comparison is a correct comparison. to be. ali al-qaeda, gentlemen should come and thank the representatives of the people in the islamic council, especially those who came to insist on this law, help and pass this law, not to say that if the law of strategic action of the islamic council and it was not against the opposition of the zionist regime, we could have asked mr. biden and mr. trump what was the difference. both sides are the same scissors in securing the interests of the americans in confronting the thoughts of the

iranian nation. disruption of this agreement was done by us or the americans. well, everyone who saw mr. trump came out of this agreement, so i think these statements were not realistic. it is not in accordance with the law and logic, and there is no doubt that efforts should be made to actually support this law , god willing, in the implementation position , we expect the future government as the islamic council to implement this law, god willing, and just as yesterday, the supreme leader of the islamic revolution also mentioned niki and i am grateful. i am also grateful for their kindness, both from the parliament and from the hands of this the law of support, god willing, we should try to make this law the basis of action in the future, without a doubt.

the islamic council stands firmly on this law and it will be implemented. thank you very much, mr. azizi, for your presence in tonight's news special interview and mr. moqtadhi . and god a familiar stanza with a familiar voice, who is this hussain who is crazy about him?

he says: i saw some scenes of our own warriors in these scenes of our own life, the memories of our own life, i can't believe that there was even the slightest weakness in the scene of karbala al-ayaz ballah. these young people who took 1,600 people from shia in takrid and told each of them to turn their backs on their religion, insult their principles, did not show up. a school where the words of haj qassem soleimani in the collection of sand paintings of whose hossein have come to artistically

convey the message of hossein's uprising through the words of one of his followers, the reason for sacrifice and being a victim is a hard battle that should not be easily passed over. sacrifice is important. but more important than the sacrifice is what the person is sacrificed for. the greatness of what is sacrificed for. short and concise messages, but as long as the history

of the islamic republic of iran. in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. in a telephone conversation with the president of kazakhstan, the president-elect considered the development of relations with this country as one of the priorities of the foreign policy of the islamic republic of iran in the framework of strengthening neighborly relations. mr. bizikian said: the two countries have diverse and many capacities to expand relations, which should be used from this capacity.