let us see the report together with dr. jaberi ansari in the studio first, like last nights, then we will come back and start tonight's program together. when this assassination is over, the question arises as to what is the next step and how do we want to succeed in the evening exchange and many other questions that unfortunately we have to say that the answers to most of these questions are not pleasant. this is the question of the zionist regime's channel 12 analysis about the stage after the assassination of martyr haniyeh, or this analysis of a former officer of the zionist regime's army about the dangerousness of the terror policy for the israeli regime. one of the security officials to me

he said that in recent years, netanyahu has insisted a lot on the issue of assassinations, and this is a dangerous issue. part of the zionist media's attempt to answer the question of whether these assassinations have brought the regime closer to its goals since the beginning of the war against gaza, which is to destroy hamas or not? in response to the same question, a zionist analyst said that these assassinations were ineffective. israel never. it can destroy hamas or eradicate it. a former commander of the zionist army also said: successive assassinations have not brought israel even a millimeter closer to its goals. in mm the assassinations, no matter how successful they were, did not bring us one millimeter closer to the real objectives of the war. the possibility of entering long and attrition wars is one of the other consequences of the zionist regime's assassinations, which, according to the zionist media

, will lead us to long and attrition wars, which are not in the interest of israel. according to zionist experts, the zionists' despair in reaching winning and losing the initiative in the field is another consequence of their terrorist policy. talking about absolute victory and other slogans are only words. israel from october 7 to the reason for unsuccessful leadership is lost initiative. it is an initiative that, according to the zionist media, is now in the hands of iran. the ball is not in our court now, the initiative is in the hands of the opponent and they are the decision makers. the fear and terror of the residents of the occupied territories of the bloodshed of martyr haniyeh is in a situation where their trust in netanyahu's cabinet and the zionist knesset has decreased from more than 70% before the al-aqsa storm operation to less than 20%, according to mojtaba shah soni.

the news agency of mr. dr. jaberi ansari from the point and subject mentioned in this report let's start with the confession of the zionist regime's own experts and analysts that despite this chain of terror that the zionist regime has launched and the actions and operations that the zionist regime is carrying out , they are failing to achieve their goals , in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. the assassination of mujahid martyr ismail haniyeh, the leader of the palestinian islamic resistance movement , hamas, is in any case a very important event in the series of events that happened especially in the last 10 months after the al-aqsa storm operation and october 7, and it will definitely have consequences and its subsequent issues. it will also create new trends therefore

, let's start this issue by paying attention to the point you made, from the discussion on what occasion, in what context, this reference to the chain of terror by the zionist regime happens . the interpretation of the israeli analysts and strategists is that the last 10 months of the gaza war for months, the israeli army is in the back alleys. the gaza strip is fighting and the mission is still unfinished. the three goals that were announced for the gaza war was the release of the prisoners, who practically killed almost the majority of them in the attacks that they carried out, and now it is almost clear that this issue is one of the issues at all. the goals of netanyahu and the ruling team are not in israel , although as a primary excuse. the beginning of the war has been mentioned

, but in any case, a number of prisoners remained, and the negotiations were conducted in different periods of the ceasefire negotiations, the last stage of which was going on in the last two or three weeks, and there was pressure from the americans, because in fact , the democratic party is heading for the presidential elections and needs some successes, and maybe this could be one of these successes in foreign policy, although domestic policy fights in america are more important and have priority, but in any case, some issues foreign policy can also help, so this was the first goal of the declaration. the second goal was to end the rule of hamas or the control of hamas in the gaza strip, and the third goal was to actually defeat the resistance and hamas in this area and become a civilian, or to change the situation of the resistance before the 7th of october. almost none of

this has been achieved. it is natural that in a heavy invasion of ten months and all the killing and destruction that has been done , there is no possibility for the government under the administration of the hamas movement to do its work in a normal way. it is a completely war situation. bunbaran and destruction but the goals of none of them have been achieved. the same interpretation as we said is our lip service. in summary , the situation of israel in gaza is 10 months in the streets . they fought in the streets. they killed 40,000 people . the objectives of the war have not been achieved, and in fact, it is the same interpretation as deadlock. which we were referring to strategically in the war , it always remains, this is a platform, in fact , it is a problem. at least the outward signs of american politics

showed this at this point for various reasons , including the needs of the elections that we mentioned, on the one hand, on the other hand, within the ruling government. in israel, a division and differences had started , there was even talk of the resignation of the minister of war of israel, the so-called minister of defense according to their own interpretations, and a renewed social and protest movement by the families of prisoners . again, some internal social and political movement was being created, so an external demand for a ceasefire and an internal demand for credit some pressures, protests and the announcement that the minister of war of israel, some other officials who joined in actually forming the war team and building a kind of national consensus in israel for the gaza war , created a division in it, which means that with the conclusion of

the ceasefire negotiations, it will end in some way. and the collapse of netanyahu's cabinet, i will tell you that it was an external pressure and an internal dispute. it has even been quoted from top officials working in netanyahu's war cabinet that he is only pursuing his own goals and that the first thing that matters to him is his own interest before it is the interest of israel or even the ruling coalition. in fact, and the current situation, these differences, in addition to the fact that the war scene is still bombed , means that once israel has finished , strategically, it has been able to decide the battle, yes , it has killed, destroyed, and destroyed. he did it in front of the cameras of the world, but he could not strategically end the war, say i have finished this war, well, on the one hand , there is an external request for a ceasefire, on the one hand, there is internal pressure, and on the other hand, there is an internal dispute for a ceasefire. netanyahu sees that

he has not achieved his strategic goals and if a ceasefire is established and goes towards the end of the war, the countdown of his government will actually begin. maybe his prime ministership and start. auditing and investigative committees and all other issues that will actually happen in such wars, the most expedient scenario for netanyahu from this angle is to disrupt the game and actually open new doors. regarding the relative position of the israelis, in the history of the zionist regime, security operations, especially assassinations , have been one of the specialties of israel's intelligence and security institutions, and it is their position. in fact , in this situation, the deadlock that has been created by reference to security operations and a chain of assassinations terrors are trying to actually gain power , show power, create victory in security angles

, if a stalemate is created in the military angle , open a window to have a glimpse of the political scene in america and betting. on the arrival of trump , in fact, and in a way, in fact, scoring a goal at the democratic gate and helping to become trump's assistant , mr. dr. jabri ansari, for you, this chain of terror that you mentioned from tehran, lebanon, baghdad, and syria, i want to find out why. in the assassination of ismail haniyeh , he chose this time frame and the islamic republic of iran, this condition or container strategically, we discussed some of its aspects for israel, but this timing itself and this place now has a meaning in beirut that must be analyzed. it has one meaning in baghdad and another meaning in tehran. each of them actually has meanings , let's start from tehran, which is more important, in fact, and

it is more significant, in the capital of iran, in the center of iran , it conducts an operation, it manages within the framework of the need for power and referring to the position of its own half to show power, but in fact , the place has its own meanings and implications in the strategic container that was created after the 7th of october. became and especially after sadiq's promise and a kind of relative deterrence that was formed between iran and the zionist regime for the benefit of iran by carrying out this operation in tehran , in the heart of tehran, he actually wants to play this game after october 7 on a larger scale. in the shorter scale, after the honest promise , the game of doubt and one can actually impose a new equation, mr. dr. jaber.

a set of conditions and actions and reactions that i hope we will get a chance to address has its own significance in terms of time, an hour after the swearing in ceremony of the islamic republic of iran and the company mr. ismail haniyeh was the guest of honor in this event. resistance of the tehran summit, this operation is usually carried out in these kinds of assassinations in the last minutes, when the operational team finds an opportunity and is available to them, the operation is checked by the center that is available to us , whether we do it or not, and this is the moment. in fact , it finds its own meaning, as soon as it becomes available, in this special hour, it has its own implications. i want

to emphasize all this a bit. it happened and his companions, the late minister of foreign affairs and other companions, an immediate and sudden election was held in iran with such speed that perhaps many people expected that it would not be a very exciting and competitive election. in fact, iran complied with these conditions and set of needs and a competitive and serious election took place. the competition was very close to the second round. in the second round, one of the two candidates won. having their own discourse and their own attention and priorities immediately after this competitive election of the director. the scene was somehow done by the elected president , by all his rivals, and above all by

the supreme leader of the literature and political discourse that was brought up was the discourse of national unity, that is, in the context of all the contradictions that exist, and unfortunately in one or two last year, it had gotten a bit more intense and progressed. the big happy thing that happened was that a serious competitive election was held. it is true that part of the society didn't come, but for reasons that we don't want now, but we had a contribution and all those qualities that the leadership it was emphasized during the election and above that after the victory, despite the heavy competition , it is normal to fight in election campaigns , they don't hesitate in the middle of the election political fights, but a kind of hope was created in the social context, the social gaps went towards. the adjustment within the government

showed a kind of unity and a movement towards national unity, and all this, in my opinion and many analysts' opinion, is the israelis' red line. for years, this has been the widening of internal divisions in iran social level and within the governance structures , so this attention is actually important from this angle that feeling. this arrangement is not a good arrangement for israel, it should disrupt the game, disrupt the table, impose a new game , which at the strategic level of the issue should be answered. we must look at the set of conditions from the gaza war, regional conditions, international conditions, iran's situation and our current social and political conditions. mr. doctor, i will borrow from your final sentence for the next question, which is now looking at all the components and the details that exist and considering that mr. haniyeh

was with a diplomatic passport and as an official guest of the islamic republic of iran and this assassination was in the territory of the islamic republic of iran. it happened , what should be the answer to this terror? well, as you mentioned, this assassination in tehran, we also said that after participating in such a ceremony, it was a completely official ceremony and someone was targeted, who is the highest political official of a resistance movement and a major and fundamental liberation movement in the islamic ummah. to a reliable and respected figure in the islamic ummah. and one of the honors of the islamic ummah and the one who is an official guest the islamic republic of iran has been the president of the government of the islamic republic of iran and has also had the political passport of the palestinian authority

. they passed a large part of the palestinian land in order to form the palestinian state on a small part of it, and yet the israelis, who are not bound by any of the obligations and laws of the international regulations , are not bound by the contract that they signed themselves, and have a government passport. which is actually the party to their contract it is, and the parties to their commitment are not considered respectable by its owners. of course, this is a very small symbol of israel's historical and long-term policy, from the movements of the zionist movement before the establishment of israel to the establishment of israel in the form of a new fake entity until today , continuously all international regulations and international resolutions and laws violated the international

law, never committed to any of these laws, and it is one of the last manifestations of israel's lack of commitment. there is also an assassination operation in tehran. what should iran do in response? first, let's see what happened and what are the dimensions of iran's international prestige and reputation, and iran's reputation is actually targeted. the structure and deterrence system of the islamic republic of iran is clearly flawed and is being attempted . in the context of a bombing failure, to be more precise , a deep bombing in the war in gaza, side ways should be opened to get rid of the bottleneck in gaza through the same thing that we mentioned, referring to security solutions as the specialized work of the israeli intelligence and security institutions.

they have decades of experience and have assassinated hundreds of people outside of israel over the past decades. doing this is disadvantageous to everyone now, the characteristic of this regime is the characteristic of terrorism, and one of their usual characteristics is to carry out technical assassinations in different parts of the world. in fact, what is the zionist regime doing in this chain of terror? it started from beirut , other than inside palestine, and now it went inside palestine in beirut, in hezbollah's security square in the suburbs of beirut, in the south of beirut. it was announced that during these 10 months , the operations of the parties were carried out on both sides of the border, that is, on both sides of the borders of lebanon with occupied palestine, so this means invading the border area and the conflict area. going to the lebanese capital and actually violating the rule governing the conflict all this time.

we have to open a discussion here, which i believe is very decisive in iran's response. many say that the israelis are looking to open a bigger war, a regional war in fact, and a direct conflict between iran and israel , so that the americans and the west enter the war and the scene changes completely. it is true that israel is trapped in gaza, it is also trapped in the northern front, in the sense that it cannot finish, that is, the northern front is open, hezbollah's war operations continue. israel is also in progress. the stage of erosion is still entering a de facto israel on the southern front, according to their own definition, gaza, and on the northern front , the lebanon front, has entered an erosion confrontation and cannot. make a decision and end it. in no way is an attrition confrontation in israel's interest, but if it continues, the war has not been won because

it has to reach a reassuring point, and after that, in fact, it will be in its interest to end the war immediately, but from that. on the other hand, this is one side of the coin. the other side of the coin is that the war of attrition means the continued erosion and depletion of israel. naturally, in the interests of israel. it is to open new doors, but this does not mean that it opens doors to new conflicts and uses its own relative position to impose new conditions on the actors opposite it, so what does this mean is not war, because if israel enters into a conflict, it is true that iran and the other parties will see a deadly conflict and these injuries may be serious in an all-out confrontation, there is no doubt that this is war. anyway , it will cause great damage, but israel has a small geography of 27,000 square kilometers , and it has a very limited geopolitics in terms of geopolitics.

and the political geography of israel has no obstacles , no extension, no depth, and in a major conflict , before the opposing sides suffer serious injuries, which they can see in major wars , especially if the western and american parties enter , it is israel that it will suffer irreparable damage and the entire zionist project will face an existential crisis. therefore, we must be careful when discussing war. of course, war is a very sensitive issue and no country and no actor in international politics goes to war by choice. war has huge costs. but in evaluations should be done carefully. the fact is that israel prefers this. without referring to a war, because the war will have much bigger losses for him, the regional war and the really big war

will affect his existence and his confrontational parties. and the existential crisis that started after october 7 will accelerate and gain more serious depth . it is true that the opposite parties will also suffer great losses. but the opposite sides have setbacks and extend and have depth. this regime, which is involved in an occupied land of 27,000 km there are several millions of palestinians and they have their own conflicts and internal disputes. in such a big crisis , they will suffer the most and their existence will be in danger. so what is israel doing? he wants to open the current ceiling of the bombardment of the war by referring to special operations and his own relative position and... imposing new conditions of new balances on the actors against him without entering the war

. to open a new way to secure his interests, he is looking for this in lebanon with the condition that this is for the israelis that the party god, according to the set of conditions that exist in lebanon, for example, the perception is that it is dangerous. either escalate the conflict or don't actually respond to israel out of fear of a major war. this is the bet of the israelis. but the day when the iranian embassy made a bet and in the strategic evaluations it achieved , it came out in their media that israel's strategic evaluation was that iran would not respond. and then the promise came true. now israel has another bet. their bet is that war is more likely than worry there is a significant possibility that the other parties do not respond seriously. so what should we do here? in my opinion

, we should actually manage the scene conditions under some strategic rules. a new government in iran has created a bed of national unity and national consensus, and this is a national capital for the iranian society and for the government of iran . may the new government be able to start working and follow its actions and plans. but at the same time , iran's deterrence has become a target. iran's high-ranking guest at this level in tehran, the capital of iran targeted israel's goal is to impose a new condition on a new deterrence system or a new deterrence equation to be more precise. and exiting the bombest ghast. the scene must be managed in such a way that the political and strategic achievements of iran and the resistance are preserved and at the same time israel is not allowed

, so that the new equation and balance is under. we have a detailed analysis of the latest situation in israel, the region and the world , and we have the power to play and maneuver. it will be reviewed, maybe a combined formula will be chosen, there is no need for us . let's do our own things and be clear about what we will do. this ambiguity and complexity itself is a part of the management scene that must be done, but besides this issue, in my opinion, several other points must be addressed seriously, and i said that now you are mentioning these things, we have 3 minutes. let's have an overview and at the same time

let us know what actions and strategies can be used by different countries to create an alliance against the zionist regime. i i will complete the previous discussion, which will somehow be the answer to this, the first thing that needs to be done, and we had some delay in it today, thank god, with the third notice issued by the irgc, part of this issue has been repaired, we need to narrate. we need to report to the public opinion at home and abroad. this incident is not aimed at iran alone , it is aimed at our high-ranking guest, who is respected in the islamic community, and in the outside world. all eyes are on us. one of our problems is that we delay in presenting the accurate official narrative and this gives permission to our enemy what does it mean to narrate? that is, the same party that comes and carries out the assassination and causes the damage also creates a narrative. fake narratives in the service of the project he is following. therefore , we have to complete the actual process or the narration project and make it accurate. the second point is this

is an assassination. it is a big security event and it needs a detailed report. i hope that as soon as possible, the security institutions and the subordinate institutions will be able to present this detailed report with a detailed investigation of the issue, and in that report, different aspects of the issue should be addressed. the third point of related content to strategic management is the issue that we have mentioned some aspects of. the best answer is in the middle of the roof, in fact, the policy that is allowed to us, and the issue should not be looked at with zero and no voice . the best option or a combination of options will be chosen, god willing. and will be implemented, which actually creates a new deterrence equation in favor of iran, does not allow the israeli project to proceed and does not allow israel to get out of its strategic grip in the gaza war. this requires the coordination of various regional and international actors and a set of measures. the last point that

to say do n't scare me, we still have 28 minutes until half time. half the world program starts today. now i'll finish . stay alive. the next point is very important and i hope we get another chance to discuss it . it's over. this program of ours should be done one by one hypertext, what we said so far was the text, this text has a hypertext, a bigger strategy of the islamic republic of iran. i hope that another independent opportunity will be provided to address this, but i would like to say that after hundreds of years, iran has managed to establish power in its peripheral region in west asia and influence and iran's presence in the west as far as national and in the south as far as bab al-mandam and the red sea is gone. this is a fateful and historic moment for iran and iran's power . we need a complete and comprehensive foreign policy strategy, and i believe that at this moment, the government

we are starting to work, two issues should be on the agenda and the priority of this strategy , internal consolidation and external agreement within the framework of a grand strategy to manage the set of conditions required by iran's new power in the region and on the international scene, mr. dr. jaberi ansari, thank you very much. thank you for your presence and explanations from the broadcast of the news network time gave us a few more seconds . i say goodbye to you. i am begging for a special prayer for good night and god.