if the jcpoa countries do not comply with their actions, i will increase my reserves of heavy water, he said in the same year 98 that i will remove the limit on uranium enrichment. aban had said in november 2018 that the enrichment limit in fordo. i will stop. i will start gassing the fordo centrifuges. who did these negotiations? it was done by the same. later, when the americans left, we brought the law of strategic action and said the five steps in the technique. nothing happened, there was no restraint in his politics.

we brought the law of the parliament. after this period , the supreme national security council said that the negotiations should be carried out . the same gentleman who has been introduced to the parliament has been in the negotiating team and sometimes the chief negotiator . what is your specific question? my specific question is if we accept these and you have already you said that rabat is not on the side , so if you come, there will be bad things. you are counting on this gentleman's positive negotiating qualities , and if you accept this , it means that this person has the ability to follow up to become a minister or not, so please tell me. mr. s. well, now they are talking about their point of view, i am talking now, the question is, i think the issue is that you believe that in the form of a series of policies that have been determined for negotiation. mr. araghchi, as a member of

this negotiating team, can perhaps perform better, or we should credit him for the mistake that happened, as a member who is responsible for that record in that negotiation , mr. araghchi, mr. moqtadaei believes that everyone these errors and mistakes that you mention about the jrc are the fault of one person in a team i agree with kashtaba's negotiation, but i'm talking about you now. its nature has not been determined, and first of all, a lot of people actually think that it is a very good thing based on lack of knowledge, and let's talk about that damaging agreement.

this is the interpretation of the highly skilled revolutionary leader . let's give a coin to each of his agents. after 10 years, if the same people want to become ministers, then we will say that, well, now they don't have much of a role . mr. zarif has not been introduced as a minister, but he must answer, but he is not in our hands right now, so there is no place for him. according to the minister of information, in fact, it became clear later.

he was supposed to cancel the sanctions, first he said all the sanctions, then he was told about the allocation, he was told only the nuclear sanctions. in 2008, utern, who had nuclear weapons applied to me, did not even discuss whether it should be canceled or not. well, this agreement was a bad agreement , so who would do this? if i was a member of the jcpoa, i got the coins. yes, i have to today. let me answer, well, other than these gentlemen who are today what does mr. iraq want to become a minister? i will tell you this in parentheses. today, i am in the commission of mr. araghchi, who came together. salam alaikum . this discussion took place. maybe it was their presumption. i want them to finish my first discussion. by the way, there is another representative. i will discuss it with him. i started, i didn't talk at all at first, because we talked with him for hours before.

giving explanations, even some of their explanations were very useful and legal for me , but there were some things that i did not like. trust him, today i will discuss with mr. iraq , what do you know with what? i started, mr. moqtadaei , no, i don't know, i said , "sit down in the economic and cultural diplomacy, let's talk, then i told him , i said, "dad, i already got my answer in you . i forgot to trust somehow . of course, they also gave explanations. some of their explanations were good, but now the discussion did not go very far because all the commissions were talking in the jarjam. many of the representatives who were in favor of the jcpoa say, sir, if mr. iraq is going to repeat that process again, what should we say to the people, and today i confidently say that i will say this to those 28 other dear colleagues because you will kill one of them, dear 288, and i

have no doubts about the compassion and in fact the good intentions of all my colleagues, but i want to say something. look , today, if we trust mr. araghchi , we have no right to say in 6 months, one year, two years from now, so why? this is why we don't have the right, because we have reason, because we have to look at experience mr. moqtada, you are both a fair person and you are in charge of the jcpoa. no, we want a home

for the people of iran. i want to tell them that the statement that the supreme national security council issued at one point was that the americans and europeans did not fulfill their obligations and the words of the supreme leader of the revolution who had previously warned that i am not optimistic about this, it just came out of the water there, this is my technique these are you from. there, in the statement, it was said that the wise restraint of the iranian nation was left unanswered by the westerners, and it was said that the europeans only issued a political statement and

did not come to compensate for the american sanctions. it was said there that the balance was disturbed and mr. rouhani's government could not achieve this balance either. fix it , the problems are here. it was said there that we will give 60 days for the jcpoa countries to fulfill their obligations in the banking and oil fields. six means september, the next step, november, january , we moved forward. that is, we and i , sitting in front of you, are asserting that if the government had paid more attention to the warnings of the leadership , more benefits would have been provided for the iranian nation, it did not pay attention.

it is a technical matter. this is that the supreme leader praises the law of strategic action. because the interests of the iranian people were in it, 100 of those who said that this law had nothing or was bad, they have a bad understanding of your political field, i am a teacher of political science and international relations, and i am saying this. my wife, but i want to say that after these stories , it was decided to negotiate again, the negotiation was also considered at the macro level of the country . let's go and negotiate . they are sending that person to negotiate. mr. president said today, "sir, this is not worth it. let him be the minister of foreign affairs. if he wants to talk about the jcpoa, he should come and talk on another program. in the case of mr.

araghchi, after the research that we did, i am saying that if you had told me 20 days ago, sir , come, i would have said it on this tv program, now i for now, i have to study. i studied . i have three questions. i asked you one of them. one of them is, are you a religious person, mr. d. god willing, this is the program of mr. araghchie? yes, my question is about abt. tedda until the end , it is small in length and the number of pages is less than 35 pages. hazrat abbasi, have you read this, sir , did you come here tonight or not? well, that's a very good question . when will you give? when will you give? since two or three days ago, we were in kale today because our commission came today, mr. araghchi. it's close to noon we give this, mr. araghchi, when you perform ablution, well, i thought it was disrespectful. i want

to start. did you not read this? then i want to explain your service and tell you this important point. no, because time is running out, i want to give a conclusion. let them answer. so you manage the time, i 'm worried about the time because i want to say something, mr. doctor , look at me later this morning, so far, i think 8 of our ministers are behind me, which means that even my prayers and lunch are very fast, they should tell me immediately at 8:00 and 9:00 it's a debate. i didn't have time to sit down and read this, but mr. araghchi i talked to you in detail today. well , i did a little bit of course. it's not like i just saw it. now, i'm sorry. it's a resume. if it wasn't for a live tv show, i would have gotten up and kissed you. you're telling the truth. god bless you . now kiss me. there's no problem. no, i want to tell you live, dear mr. moqtada, see these are all the words of all that i can change mr. araghchi's picture right now and let him be dr. hosni.

mr. araghchi was removed from responsibility after our hardworking and capable president aziz came with the spirit of defending the interests of the nation, mr. araghchi. he did not have a place in the previous government , there is no doubt about that, yes, at the same time in september 1400. my dear people , because they told me to speak technically

, i am showing this, i didn't want to, but now you have the right to see that there is a council in the country called the strategic council of foreign relations, mr. kharazi, who was the previous minister of foreign affairs, mr. dr. jalili that from the good. mr. rahim safavi, who is well-known in his field, mr. shibani, mr. mustafa, and mr. sattari, who are the president's vice president for science and technology, are considered to be the people of the country. they are in that strategic council. yes, yes, they are with the ruling of the leadership. mr. kharazi issued a ruling for mr. araghchi, the same man that we are dealing with now.

the position and responsibility of the supreme leader and the competence and abilities that i attribute to you as the secretary of the strategic council of foreign relations means that you should be the secretary of this council . the position and responsibility are important. develop its role in explaining the policies of the system and enlightening the public opinion of the world and realizing the interests of our country. then i said, of course, the decision of the consultation of mr. dr. amir abdollahian was the happy spirit of the foreign minister that i went to

the title of someone who studies in the field of international relations, i have books and i teach in the doctoral level, i really admire and i say it is strange that we have lost your active and useful force. the secretary of your council who is here is still mr. amir abdullahian. in fact, they want advice. my question is this, my brother, when a person is being used at this hour, do these men not know about the issues you are talking about, and why do they do this? do you know that the person of the people of iran is a capable person who has been introduced to my parliament member of parliament, if until yesterday i disagreed with him personally, i had a contradiction, i had a conflict of ideas , today i have to decide, sir, either i should vote yes, sir, or it is ugly for me to come and say i did not understand, i abstain, i want to vote, i have really

come to this dilemma. most of them have a positive vote, but we have an agreement with them in the form of this plan and program. what you said cannot be held accountable. if mr. araghchi becomes the minister of foreign affairs, if he spends 3 days in his ministry and acts contrary to his agreement, i , a member of the parliament, according to the constitution, can impeach him in the form of a written warning or verbal warning or question: i did my legal and legal duty , there is no abaya, but he is a minister, at that time , is your statement wrong?

sir, saying that on the recommendation of the supreme leader, i will make you the secretary of this council is a very strange thing for me , not for you, but people with different tastes, not just one person to rule over them . he was the so-called leader of the national security council for 8 years, the late mr. hashemi rafsanjani , for many years, with his decree, held many responsibilities, including the recognition assembly, which is the characteristic of the leader of the revolution, after all. they are the leader of the revolution, they have a series of expedients , they use forces with different views in other places. this does not mean that everyone had an order from the leader of the revolution. if he is nominated for a position, we must be obliged . there is a danger in this. if we recognize this, we should leave it aside. well, sir, everyone has an order from the leadership. we are against the sect's governorship. if not, i want to say that you

told me to speak technically, not technically, i speak , mr. doctor. colleagues, sometimes i hear, of course, with a series of proposed ministers in the same matter , for example, can the opinion of the leader of the revolution be such and such an option? i didn't want to hear such an argument from the ministers. he brought up something somewhere , we said a word to him, we said, if it's like that, you say it publicly, we'll go to the office of ohm revolution. i would like to tell you that if he doesn't have a vote now, if he does , i will honestly say that i am truly committed

to defending him in every way that he does, if he is right. we don't have personal enmity , we have a difference of taste. in many things, he is in the way of what is the right path. if he becomes the minister, we will try to do the right thing with better quality, and any consultation that god has not done wrong will be prevented. let it be done , i said this to myself honestly many times now i would like it to be a complete document. based on this , others can demand from us this issue. you should take a minute or two to summarize for your excellency . first of all, i would like to thank the representative of the people of tehran for being a fair person. his last words are that he is finally ready. cooperation with someone who, if voted , will become the minister of the islamic republic of iran, and his position has finally been registered as a respectable position . don't worry, i

am speaking from one person . laws are the basis of the general agreement of all those who are working in the country he also left the hand of the parliamentarian free, which means that i must bravely see if there is a mistake and stop it, even if he is my friend, even if he is my friend, after all, this is the interests of the iranian nation . see for yourself, we have our own freedom and freedom in the parliament, what does that mean? on the night of the first day of the grave, the parliamentarian asks questions to himself alone. we are really between ourselves and god. when we look, we see that the party in the national security commission has come and says, "i am." i am a soldier of this country. i am a soldier of the army. your time is almost over. as a summation and respect for the people's time, i will say one thing, people of the government.

we have to help mr. medical, our help is not to be naive, but in the first step, not to prejudge, let him complete the work he brought us in the parliament. wherever it is necessary to remove the side, we should say that it is not qualified , but those who have the minimum , don't be too strict. thank you very much . i only had a minute and a half to speak. viewers who saw the building and i repeat this that i hope that what we said was really honest, if i came tonight and with mr. araghchi, i entered the reviews, i swear to god , the discussion. it is not a personal dispute with them. i am responsible first to god and then to the people who voted for me in tehran

. entered the country, so i hope that each representative will make a decision based on the sincerity of his intentions, and i think that the conversation we are having tonight with dr. moqtadaei will be widely viewed later , because i think that i said things that i hope it was wrong, but i think that in two days 3 another day, another week, we all have time , i think, thank you again, and i want to say that my name is to vote yes for any minister at the beginning, unless i really have a reason to vote, because really , my name is that i belong to the governments of doctors who i did not vote, honestly

, in the name of god, ladies and gentlemen, hello, welcome to today's world. we are with you at the end of the 30th day of the genocide in gaza, on the day that the european mediterranean human rights watch announced that 2,100

palestinian infants were killed so far.

like us, there are only two of you so far. all non-injuries are serious injuries and others are under under al-qad zaylinin , this morning, the two houses of the family of abu jabara and abu sharif in block khamsa were targeted , and the search for the price of the missing persons in abu sharif's house is now underway .

we have to win this war, we have to win, not to go to battle and fight or to fight, but to win them, to bring them down on their knees.

in the meantime, the united states has considered the killing of palestinian civilians in the school of subjects to be justified , civilians whom the zionists bombed every time. americans are being targeted. there is clear evidence and records that hamas uses civilians as human shields and uses civilian infrastructure to hide itself. he is the spokesperson of the us state department. the ally of the zionists who calls the crimes of this mass killing machine justifiable. a mass killing machine that massacres civilians every time under the pretext of targeting resistance fighters. for example, where they said that hamas forces hid in the tunnels under shafa hospital and besieged this hospital for more than two weeks. but after their withdrawal, about 400 bodies were found in

sick schools where refugees are accommodated or hospitals, the last case of which was the taabiin school in gaza, with more than a hundred martyrs of crimes using bombs gifted by the americans, which have killed nearly 40,000 people so far, 40,000 of whom 60% there are children and women.

it is in gaza, by presenting the necessary evidence of the genocides in gaza, the international court in the united states agreed to vote on the end of the american arms aid to israel , but after a while, it rejected it and declared that it is not responsible for this, and this issue is related to the conditions. it is war and foreign policy, this means giving a check white signature of the us to israel to continue the genocide in gaza. while the us claims that hamas uses civilians as human shields, during the ten months of the war in gaza , the zionists drove palestinian soldiers handcuffed on the hood of a war machine in the heat of the city and some of them were also handcuffed. they sent a shield of life to the ruins in gaza to find, for example, the tunnels of hamas, and if

there is an explosion during these searches, they will lose their lives, sanazo kahini of sed and sima news agency.