i said that the leader of the revolution has a statement saying that the red lines have been violated, the text of the jcpoa is so full of errors, and i want to tell you frankly that it is awful to add 28 conditions to it. well , mr. muqtazai, did i go and negotiate? well, mr. arakim, one regarding those people, i will say it fairly because this discussion is according to your words, i would like to see one point. mr. doctor, rightly saying that the leader of the revolution is not only defending mr. araghchi, but also mr. zarif several times, he is a zealous believer. i have no doubts about these qualities, but i want to say that the leader of the revolution, at the same time, always criticizes the results of the actions of these loved ones. taking it seriously means that this is the policy of the revolutionary leader . officials always try to appreciate them . they say you worked hard. we also say, mr. iraq , why don't you give up? you really worked hard in front of those five

plus one tyrants. you went, sat, sweated, and negotiated , but the result is your work. it was indefensible, you see , the leader of the revolution said that the jcpoa was a pure loss in 1400 , when mr. rouhani was leaving, in his last meeting with the government, the leader of the revolution said that this approach of yours in the field of foreign policy was a lesson. what is the percentage of this error that you are referring to? you can follow the account of mr. araghchi as a member.

someone, we actually have a difference of opinion here, look at my question, my brother , i will ask you three questions, then you asked me a few questions, i am at my service, the first question is mr. araghchi a trained diplomat skilled means what skillful means that he knows how to make a phone call, he knows how to negotiate, he knows how to sit in front of the other party, he knows when he is a minister. or that american official, unconsciously, of course, they say that when he punches the ground, his automatic is thrown like this and bounces towards the iranian diplomat who iran america is sitting with its culture and civilization and its identity for 2300-400 years, for example, if it has a culture with that massacre in gaza, we say that they don't have the courage to pick it up and throw it at him

, but he hit unconsciously. i'm iranian, i sat in front of you , i say this person can be a cultivated person, so i 'll answer your question, answer the first question, one by one , let's go ahead, yes, one, i really don't like you, sir, from a moral point of view, of course , i want to talk about these topics and in indeed, i want to negate mr. araghchi's character, but i want to be very honest and ethical my answer is that if these friends are diplomats. based on my knowledge of mr. araghchi , i know more experienced diplomats in the ministry of foreign affairs, even with a reformist perspective , but he can also respect them , and he has experience as an ambassador. i don't know if he was in finland or in japan. i know more accomplished diplomats than mr. araghchi. if your criterion is automatic and i don't know, it's not a question. can you say the same thing about mr. president? i mean, what do you say , sir? is there anyone who

is better than mr. president? yes, i look i see, he is right, of course you may say, mr. muqtazai , what would you do if we were to introduce someone to you? i say, well, i am not in that position now that you are not either. i used to say that the second person is better and the fifth person is worse. this is not the case. tomorrow morning, not saturday morning, sunday , monday, next week, i want to vote . i said that he is more trained than them, but that he also has a certain level of training, which we have no doubt about may i be healthy, first of all, it has not been 30 years

, it has been more than 30 years, as you said , we have gone through all the levels, but my second question, yes, my second question , please just keep it short, mr. mukhtar, look at the five steps. on 2/18, the government said that if the jcpoa countries do not comply with their actions , i will increase my reserves of heavy water. it said in the same 98 that i will limit the enrichment and uranium, in fact, in connection with the modernization of the heavy water reactor. i will do iraq , i will increase my research and development. in november 2018, he said that the restriction of enrichment in fordow would stop me. i will start gassing the ford centrifuges. these negotiations were done by kia. later on, after

the americans left, we brought the law of strategic action and said the five steps in the fan. nothing happened in his politics. he had no conscience. we brought the law of the parliament. after this period , the supreme national security council said that the negotiations should be carried out. we accept and you already said that rabat side is not well, if you are going to blame the evils of the jcpoa on this man , you should also put these positive characteristics of negotiation on his account, and if you accept this, it means that this person has the ability to follow up to become a minister or not. very well

, sir. q well, now they are talking about their point of view, i am talking about the question now. i think the issue is that you believe that in the framework of a series of policies that were determined for the negotiation of mr. araghchi as a member of this delegation. the negotiator can perhaps have a better performance or a mistake it happened, we have to pay to his account as a member who was in that negotiation , mr. arakhti is responsible for that record , mr. moqtadaei should believe that all these errors and mistakes that you mention about the jcpoa are at the feet of one person. a negotiation team of kishtbaha on my own. mmm, i agree, but now you are talking about the proposed minister, now i didn't want anything, some jokes, but if you joke, i will laugh later, for example, i'm not a joker , let's joke, i want to say that mr. muqtaza , you see, we can't reach an agreement like that. when

whose nature has not been determined, and first of all, many people actually think many things based on lack of knowledge. and let 's give a coin to each and every one of his agents for that harmful agreement, this harmful interpretation of the leader of the revolution, after 10 years, if the same people want to become ministers, then we will say that, well, now they don't have much of a role, for example, or mr. rouhani, you should answer mr. rouhani that you should definitely answer , mr. rouhani, well , mr. zarif has not been nominated as a minister, you should definitely answer, but it is not in our hands to appoint him somewhere. later it became clear as stated in fact, i had not received the first inquiry from the minister of information , he was forced to resign because of the issue of his children's citizenship. well, we can't reach him either, and he should have answered. batesh has already

received a coin, he was honored with a bravery medal , and the claim was that the sanctions have been lifted. well, i say, dad, let's talk about this record, mr. moqtadari . please, let me talk to you technically. since you are a university professor, we share literature let's see together. i agree with you on the jcpoa , god bless you. the jcpoa was supposed to cancel the sanctions. first, they said all the sanctions, then they told him only the nuclear sanctions. all sanctions should be canceled. i have nothing to do with the sanctions against the dollar cycle, which was imposed in 2008 under the pretext of nuclear power. in the same agreement, they did not even discuss whether it should be canceled or not. well, this agreement was a bad agreement, so who would do this? if i was a member of the agreement , i took the coins. yes, i have to go and answer today. apart from these gentlemen, today mr. araghchi wants to become a minister, i will tell you this point in parentheses, you will have my time today in the commission of mr.

araghchi , who came together. by the way , i started discussing the outcome with the other representatives. i didn't talk at all at first because we talked with them in detail for hours before . no, my conclusion is that he agreed i can't give a good grade. let's talk together. then i said to him, i said, "dad, i already got my answer in you. i already have my evaluation. i'll look for it . i'm looking for it. i'll hear an explanation from you about other issues . i'll forget about it. i'll trust him. of course, i gave him some explanations. some of them are fairly good." it was, but now the discussion didn't start much because all the commissions stopped talking. you have also seen that these days in the parliament, we are not the only ones who are arguing about the

jcpoa. what should we say to the people, and today i say with confidence that i will say this to those 28 other dear colleagues, because we will kill ourselves , we will kill you 288 dear god, i have no doubts about the compassion and good intentions of all my colleagues, but i want to tell you something. who has no right to complain, we want to buy a house, a car, make a deal

, we reserve the right to complain, in the end there are strange things like the trigger mechanism and snapback, and this will be known next year. what is october 2025 that people understand? he said to me, "why is this strange agreement with its holes not finished? now, if we can distance ourselves from my agreement, let's talk about other issues after your answer." we need to talk to each other technically. you said yes, yes, people of iran. i want to tell them that the statement issued by the supreme national security council at one point was that the americans and europeans did not fulfill their commitments and the words of the supreme leader of the revolution, which were already having warned that i am not optimistic about these , it is right out of the water. there, these are my technicians , you guys, please look at any problems we have

there, in the statement, it was said that the wise restraint of the iranian nation was left unanswered by the westerners. it was said there that the europeans only issue a political statement and did not come to compensate for the american sanctions. it was said there that the balance was disturbed. and mr. rouhani's government could not fix this balance. the problem is here. it was said there that we will give 60 days for the jcpoa countries to fulfill their obligations in the banking and oil fields . step by step, they also said that we will move towards burj 2. one step is called tower four, the next step is tower six shahrivar. the next step

is in november and january. we have taken steps together, that is, we and i, who are sitting in front of you, are asserting that if the government of the time had paid more attention to the warnings of the leadership, more benefits would have been provided to the iranian nation. we came to the parliament and said that we are bringing a law of strategic action. the supreme leader praised the law of strategic action because the interests of the iranian nation were included. i am saying these things about politics and international relations, but i want to let me say that after these stories, we decided to negotiate again, negotiation at the verbal level. the country has been taken into consideration, now that we are supposed to go to negotiate, they are sending that person

to negotiate, and today mr. president said, sir , this is not worth it, let him be the minister of foreign affairs, if he wants to talk about the jcpoa, he should come. if he wants to talk about mr. araghchi in another program, after the research we have done, i will tell you. if you had told me 20 days ago, sir, come , i would have said it in this tv program. for now, you should study. let's do it. i read one question. i have 3 questions . i asked you two of them. one of them is a question. yes, my question is this, from the beginning to the end, it is small in length and the number of pages is not many, that is , it is less than 35 pages. hazrat abbasi, did you read this? did you come here tonight or did you not read it? well, it is a very good question. let me explain it to you. watch this program. today

, i don't know when to give you, when to give you, since two or three days ago, we were in this. yes, today, because our commission came today, mr. araghchi. if you give us this in the afternoon, mr. araghchi, when you perform ablution, well, i thought it was disrespectful . i want to start. you didn't read this. after that, i want to explain to you, and this is not important. because time is running out, i want to give you an answer. so you manage the time , i'm worried about the time because i want to say something, mr. doctor, look at me later this morning, so far, i think 8 of our ministers are behind us, that is, we even have to pray my lunch very quickly. they immediately told me that there is a debate at 8:00 or 9:00. i didn't have time to sit down and read this, but mr. today i talked in detail about this, well , i did a little bit, of course, it's not like i just saw it, now, i'm sorry, it's not a resume at all , it wasn't a live tv show, i would have gotten up, i would have kissed you, you're telling the truth, god bless you, kiss now, there's no problem, it's a live program

i want to say, dear mr. moqtada, see, these are all the words i can say right now. i will change the name of mr. araghchi and let him see dr. hosni and dr. hosseini. i am that mr. hosni and hosseini . we should look at the report card . do you read that once a person has a report card, one goes, first we will look at his report card, let me tell you something, mr. doctor, now we are asking you a question , a question that we want you to let go. let me say that if you don't have a good experience of a phenomenon, you go and study it or go back to your experience. now , experience is enough for me. look, i got the answer to my question. now i want to draw a conclusion. our hard-working and capable president, shahid aziz, came with us

the spirit of defending the interests of the nation of mr. araghchi had no place in the previous government, there is no doubt about that. at the same time, shahrivar, 1400, my dear people , because they told me to speak technically , i am showing this, i didn't want to, but now , please tell me your right. mr. dr. jalil. who is considered one of the benefactors of the country , mr. rahim safavi, who is well-known in the field of mr. shibani, mr. mustafa, and mr. sattari, who was the vice president for science and technology, are in that council. they are strategic. who decides these

things? yes , they are decided by the leadership. mr. kharazi made a decision for mr. araghchi, the same man we are talking about now. seyyed abbas araghchi, please read it now. it's good for me. i have two or three answer models ready. doctor, read it for you . i said this answer is the bottom line. let me read it anyway, according to the advice of the supreme leader. yes, and the competence and abilities that i know in your excellency, i recommend you to the position of the secretary of the strategic council i attribute foreign relations, that is, you come to be the secretary of this council, the position and responsibility are important, and then they say here that until the secretariat has a structure, let's rebuild it and develop its role

in explaining the policies of the system and enlightening the global public opinion. and take action to realize the interests of our country. then i said, of course, the advisory verdict of mr. dr. amir abdullahian was the happy face of the foreign minister. and i say, strangely , we have lost the active and useful force, god god willing, he will make up for us later saying that this is the teacher. your council who are here still, mr. amir abdallahian, actually want advice. my question is this, my brother, when a person is used in this situation , don't these gentlemen know about the issues that you are talking about, and doing this , i say, why do they know, then the people? iran , a capable person has been introduced to the parliament. i am a member

of the parliament. until yesterday , i had a disagreement with him personally. i didn't understand. i abstained. i want to vote. i really came to this conclusion. it is a positive vote. but we have an agreement with them in the form of this plan and program, which you said cannot be impeached. if mr. araghchi becomes the minister of foreign affairs, if he spends 3 days in his ministry, he will act contrary to his agreement . a written verbal reminder of istizah or a question of my own legal and legal duty does not have any consequences.

who are attached to the leader of the revolution and become a foreigner. in fact, saying that on the recommendation of the supreme leader, i will make you the secretary of this council is very strange for me. no, because there are people with different tastes, not just one person to rule over them, on the advice of his majesty, the authority of moaz ruled for them, for example , mr. shamkhani, he was the leader of the national security council for 8 years, and the late mr. hashemi rafsanjani was responsible for many years by his order. many, including the assembly, recognized that the characteristic of the leader of the revolution was yes. they are the leader of the revolution, they have a series of expedients , they use forces with different views in other places, this does not mean that

everyone had an order from the leader of the revolution. there is a danger in this word, if it is misunderstood , the person is that we should put aside the issue of the independence of powers and the decision of the representative and the recognition of this. well, sir, everyone has a ruling from the leadership . as you said, talk technically, not technically, i am talking, mr. doctor, because i sometimes hear dangerous words from some of my colleagues, of course , with a series of proposed ministers on the same grounds, for example, can the opinion of the leader be such and such an option? the leader of the revolution himself has said many times, i want to say that he is the most emphatic that he is the duty representative do it yourself, argue, agree, disagree , and this has a meaning. we said, "if that's the case, you say this publicly, we'll go to the office of ohm revolution. if

he doesn't deny it, then i 'll say that it's diverting the discussion. yes, we are, and if not, mr. araghchi, i'm here to serve you. if he doesn't have a vote now, if there's a vote, i'll do it." i honestly say that i really commit myself to defend them in any issue that is the right approach. let me tell you, sir, we don't have personal enmity with each other, we have a difference in taste . if he becomes the minister, we will try to do the right thing with better quality , and if any consultation is done, god forbid, the wrong thing should be prevented. i am really honest with myself. so that it becomes a document, based on this , others can demand from us this issue , god willing. please see the two minute summary for your excellency. first of all, i would like to thank the representative of the people of tehran in qavareh, a fair person. his last words

are that he is finally ready to cooperate with someone who, if voted for, will become the minister of the islamic republic of iran. they have also finally registered a respectable position , don't worry, i am speaking from a person now, sir, i am of the same opinion. i have arrived and this is done. the agreement between us in the constitutional commission is also the general agreement of all those who are active in the country . the laws also leave the hands of the parliamentarian free, which means that i must bravely see if there is a mistake and stop it, even if it is my friend. even if it's my friend, after all, this is the interest of the iranian nation , see for yourself, we have our own freedom and freedom in the parliament, what does that mean? it means that on the night of the first day of the grave, the parliamentarian asks questions to himself alone. we when we really look between ourselves and god.

we see that the party in the national security commission has come and says that i am a soldier of this country, and your time is almost over. not to be naive, but let's not prejudge in the first step. we should complete the work he brought in the parliament, wherever necessary , we should remove the party and say that he does not have the competence, but those who have the minimum , don't be too strict, thank you very much, about a minute and a half. i have the opportunity to talk about the essence of the conversation

. i thank his highness, dr. mokhtadai and all the viewers who watched the program. i will give to every minister, i am responsible first to god and then to the people who voted for me in tehran, they cannot bear that i will go back to vote for the current that was brought to the country in the name of the jcpoa, so i hope that every representative based on the truth of the intention. let him decide for himself and i think that the conversation with the doctor tonight we have a chance, later on, many parts of our conversation will be leaked because i think i said something that i hope was wrong, but i think that in two days, three days, one week , we all have time, we think again, yes, thank you. and i want to say that i would vote yes for any minister first, unless i really

had a reason to vote against, because i really want to honestly help the governments of my doctors that i did not vote for, to solve their problems. thank you very much. thank you very much and anyway we have to wait and see that fate how will the proposed ministers be on the parliament stage ? thank you for watching tonight's conversation. good night. thank you. thank you.

sarar aqrab hiya qaed, he is giving us the voice at all, if we don't know

, he gave us the voice. the minister of foreign affairs of italy said that at the same time as iran continues to try to stop the aggression against gaza, it insists on its legitimate right to take countermeasures against the zionist regime. damascus considered the targeting of the residential area in beirut and the assassination of the iranian official guest as a clear example of the zionists' action to expand the scope of the war to other countries in the region, and expressed pessimism about this regime's failure to stop the genocide in gaza. the minister of foreign affairs of italy also agreed to advance the initiative.