hello at 2: the increase in the price of gasoline is currently not in the government's plan. mohsen pakistan, who started his first working day as a minister in the ministry of petroleum, gave this news. in fact, non-price solutions go beyond the ministry of oil, that is, in interaction and cooperation with other ministries, solutions such as the use of

cars that consume less or the use of electric cars, the facilities related to these cars can now be seen in the corners of tehran. these are valuable measures. things like this have been done , god willing, it will be on the agenda to balance the consumption without increasing the price of gasoline the minister of oil also said about the management of the imbalance between daily gas production and consumption, attracting capital from companies and the energy industry, such as petrochemicals, in increasing the production of gas fields and pursuing the energy diplomacy programs of the 13th government will be for the two oil ministries in the 14th government. . our friends have worked very hard in the field of energy diplomacy to do a very valuable work in relation to the issue of gas import from turkmenistan or in the form of gas soup from turkmenistan, which

will help to resolve this dispute because a part of this gas will be used in the country. specialists of the company of scientists succeeded with using nanochlor technology to design and produce a system for wastewater treatment. this is done systematically by improving the quality of the effluent and reducing the time of disinfection costs in various industries such as water and sewage, agriculture, aquaculture. and it is used in the food industry. thank you for your companion.

in the name of god, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the world today on the 32nd day of the gaza genocide. what stood out more than other events was the continuation of child abuse by the zionist army.

or ibn al-qassam warmi falharb sedd or ibn al-qassam warmi falharb daram qawm in gaza hashim waqta nasr al-islam qawm. in gaza, hashim wataf nasr al-islam.

but in america, for the third day, tens of thousands of

citizens of this country continue to protest against zionism in the city of chicago and around the general assembly of the democratic party . it emphasizes their own demand to stop american financial and weapons aid to the zionist regime. however, there is no listening to these protests in the meeting of the democratic party. the general assembly of the democratic party in the city of chicago , usa, is still surrounded by tens of thousands of americans protesting the continuation of the zionist regime's genocide in gaza and the continuation of the comprehensive support of the american government to this regime. demonstrators americans on the streets of chicago and in front of the democratic party's general assembly announced that

they are not ready to vote for genocide supporters from both american political parties in the elections two and a half months later . we say clearly that we will not vote for any election candidate who supports israeli genocide. our society will not be played by genocidal executioners and supporters of israel. the genocide of the palestinian people is joe biden's legacy and will be recorded in history. we will fight and fight together until we make sure the occupation ends. the american empire emerged under all circumstances genocide and crimes of israel in the last 10 months became a normal routine and continued. in the past 3 days, the police

have arrested dozens of people to deal with the spread of anti-zionist demonstrations and gatherings. while more than 40,000 innocent people were massacred in gaza with the support and bombs of the americans and at the hands of israel. tens of thousands of americans around the general assembly of the democratic party, but inside this meeting in all these three days, except in two or three cases, the rest of the speakers paid attention to this demonstration and the demands of the american people, especially the cessation of arms and financial aid to the zionist regime. did not give ali rajabi

new york broadcasting news agency.

and now the first case of tonight's plan to close the hamburg islamic center and other centers and mosques of iranians and shiites by the german government is about to enter its second month, a restriction that occurred with the attack of 8 german police forces on these centers, but still after a month, the german government he did not provide evidence that these centers violated the laws of this country. the continued closure of these centers, which according to experts is in conflict with religious freedom , is not a new thing in europe. last year, it was the islamic center of london that faced the restrictions of the british government. tonight we want motivation hidden government. europeans to close the islamic centers of iranians and shiites

and also what answers and solutions are there to face these restrictions in such a situation. welcome, until just a week or two ago, we were communicating with you in london. i arrived. well , before we want to talk about what should be done, it might not be bad to have a sketch of the scene. well, the application of these restrictions is not limited to germany. yours truly in london and england you were faced with these restrictions in a similar way , but the interesting thing is that every time such things are done, a series of excuses and accusations are made against the european governments. but when we go into the details of the story

, we even look at their own statements, we see that no violation has occurred, the laws of those countries have not been violated . this is clearly the case of germany. germany published that there was no case that even they themselves said that a law was violated or a crime was committed it's been a month at the peak. there are cases where asking a series of media outlets aligned with them, for example , to say things and say if they didn't say them, maybe it would have been much more elegant. there is an interesting case. these supporters of terrorists said that there was a whatsapp group in which a person posted a post and posted a picture. a certain person, when i was the head of the center, was in that group, but he did not react , that is, for example, their documents and justifications are such

cases, so here is the question that arises. this is that when the law has not been violated, when no offense has been committed, then what is the motive behind the scenes for these people in england and germany to attack the centers in the name of allah, the most gracious, the most gracious, thank you very much for letting me come here to serve you. i want you to see that this is a very important issue because there are really no reasons for these operations, these activities, so we have to look to see what caused such programs to be dropped, such programs that are not only for germany, in england , in the netherlands, in austria and in other places, the same programs are being implemented on different levels and today's and yesterday's issue is not the same. the issue is that they have come to the conclusion that naob

mohammadi islam is not only shi'ism, but an authentic islamic islam that does not allow economic politics and various aspects of religion to be separated from each other. they see this as a danger, not a danger that the danger of the so-called terrorists and such, the danger is that there is really no one who can stop them except islam and the rights of muslims. there are muslim youths who came out to seek justice and are getting hit, that means they are spending money, they are losing their work, they are giving you money. they are beating people in the streets, these countries who claim human rights, freedom of expression, and they are experts in it, they are trampling all this, why not

because these are dangerous, because they don't want it from a political point of view. look at the line of duty they are defending jansad and defending this barbarian gravenista . see, say it all, that islam and that pure reading of islam that is not silent in the face of genocide, every speaker it has and every center it has, from the point of view of, for example, the british government and germany should be shut down, you can almost say this. the same concern that yazid had and muawiya had he said that you should observe islam , observe your prayers and fast, but do not interfere in my work, in my politics, in my power, in my political plans . in fact, they are saying the same thing in a different language.

is the problem we are facing is that one or two of us are from the mosque? are we losing us because they are iranians or shiites, or are they planning to pervert islam? is it better for us to lose the center but not allow islam to be perverted, or for us to come and pervert these mosques ourselves? hi so-called american islam and their european and english islam, let's plan on their behalf and in fact distort islam, mr. shajare, i would like to ask a clear question here, according to the point you raised in the envelope. did you do islamic centers, well, whether in england or in germany, they have worked hard, various ceremonies have been held, and these are just the performance of the last few years

. and the pressures brought by the british and german governments, the performance and programs of these centers were very diluted and moderated, so that there might be a difference. with other centers and now, there were no other situations where people with their own ideology and their own views were promoting islam. is this management and this performance not the cause of this? they even go one step further and say that everything should be closed. yes , 100, you can see that they made a plan and they are implementing this plan systematically. if we cannot stop their plan , they will speed up their plan with their different tactics, and in fact, we have seen this in

islamic centers, not only shia islamic centers , islamic centers in england. about 5 of them some of them are sunni, they are under the control of the government , and the government wants to read lenses, they have to get permission , that is, religious centers under the supervision of the government, yes, under the supervision of someone who is not a muslim at all, that is, you can see someone, you can go to a church, give it to a muslim or a jew should turn around and see that this is completely against the whole system. in iran, our catholics , our christians use wine in their church programs, wine that is haram, wine that is illegal, but we allowed them to

do such a thing because of their understanding of their religion, we did not come to say that we should. let's decide your religion. in one way or another , islam must say that we will convert you to islam, see now, that is, in the scene where the european governments in their constitutions and the things they announce and talk about human rights , bring up the issue of religious freedom. it is interesting for iran. in their reports, they accuse of violating these freedoms in our country, despite the fact that our laws are clear and everyone has information, and we consider it harmful , it was allowed because of the respect we had for the freedom of the true religion of people in their own right. if they act in that way, it will be the same as, for example in england or in germany, a group of people use drugs because they think that this is part of their religion. see, this is a very

important issue. now, in 2008, tony blair, who was the prime minister, came and opened the debate that we have good islam and bad islam. we have to destroy islam and replace it with islam. we started at that time. we even complained to the united nations . the special rapporteur of the united nations came and prepared a report . she is asma jahangir, and in that report she said that what right did the sekiller government have to come and say? what religion is good, what religion should be given to the people who believe in it their religion should make this decision and cancel this program after. since he was prime minister, he started an association , the blair association, and started doing these activities there, and

the government of saudi arabia gave them a budget of one million , and this is the same debate that good islam, bad islam, give you good islam, give you good islam. you don't believe at all. what do you want to see? if we don't stop these activities now, and i mean leave them alone, i will say clearly that there is no evidence that this is a misunderstanding. this issue has been planned for years and years. it is possible, and because we didn't stand up to this woe , we didn't fight, the intensity is increasing day by day, and we must use all our facilities and international popular cultural rights to fight against the deviation of the pure muhammadan religion, and this should really

be one of our main issues. mr. shajareh, you mentioned that, for example, they have this view of making islam good and islam bad . an interesting thing came to my mind that sometimes they themselves make islam in the middle of the same in germany, that is, you can see, for example, the pictures of this mosque, the picture of which is behind me, for example. imam ali mosque between imam ali mosque they closed it, then they themselves demolished a mosque in berlin a few years ago, the ibn rushd mosque, and now the mosque is very interesting. the german government itself is coming and sending its people there to install a homosexual man as the imam of the mosque, a series of women who at all they don't have a hijab between the backs of that homosexual man, for example, doing this , i think it is the most caricature form of a fake islam, which , for example, the german government will come and fix it. look , these plans

have been discussed in all the think tanks, such as the rand cooperation and others, that islam the original of islam, so-called tradishnalu, we should let's replace it with secular islam and so-called liberal islam, and this is what they are doing. i mean, their activities are very clear. we really shouldn't be fooled into thinking that this is a misunderstanding, this is planned and should be prevented and should be taken as a struggle. sometimes we argue that we should do a series of legal activities , legal activities. there are different types of people's activities, one of them is struggle, the other is when someone comes and says , sir, let's solve this misunderstanding somehow . now we were also faced with this issue when we raise the issue in the media let's face it, some people give such wrong advices , for example, let's not pay much attention to it now. this is a misunderstanding

. now , let's have a conversation with a person there. with the experience we have in england, what do you think about this? yes, in 2008, it was because we stood up and... we opened the debate, we took it to the united nations and we even got help from them, and the british government was very upset that one of its angies went and complained to the united nations and us. we have prepared several reports about the same issues to the united nations it is being presented, but the people should be aware , our own people, muslims, should be aware, and we should inform ordinary people who are in different countries, because first it will be against islam, but all these programs

are against other groups. it will be opened after these are successful, that is, if this barrier is broken , it will be moved to another place. all the historical documents show that this program and the programs that have been poured before were first implemented on the muslims and then went to the groups. let's move on to the next stage. i think you could draw the scene completely what should be done anyway with the order you had? this case that happened in germany, for example, was not the first, and you say it will not be the last. the story continues. at this point , what methods and solutions do we have to stop this process or at least create costs similar to what you said in front of us? tony bell , we did it. yes, look, first of all, when we go to the doctor, the doctor first examines

the disease and then writes the prescription . first of all, we need to see where this disease really comes from. we know that the governments of the western governments are planning to replace captive islam and turn islam into that of christianity and separate political issues and other things from it. we know this and we know that they are starting to work , we know that their work is coming to fruition, but what i don't see is where is our plan to prevent this ? unfortunately, i think we are all worried about the plan. but it is not planned, planning should be based on struggle, we have religion.

we come from a religion that all our imams being a martyr for being a fighter, do we put our feet in their shoes and fight to defend the pure muhammadan islam or else we will lose . well, what exactly can these actions be, in the following, for example, we are talking about doing legal work, legal work can be done, someone says. or should we get a lawyer to fight when he knows that the plan is to divert asram , he should fight until the end, what should imam

hussain (peace be upon him) do? first of all, he was sure that yazid wanted to pervert the religion. let's reach a conclusion. first of all, we must reach that conclusion. then we must stand up and fight. not only our scholars, not only our leaders, but all our people must say that we will not allow you to distort our religion. you have no right to do this. yes , there is a legal solution, but our approach is a conciliation approach, this should not be the case. look, when you are sure that they want to introduce your religion , they will be successful in 15% this year , they will negotiate next year. 20% of the next year,

make 80 eye contact sir, that's it. the religion is completely distorted and we are the ones who are responsible for the fact that we have that religion i mean, we are implementing american islam and english shiism, thank you very much, so now we want to have a conclusion. at the end of our conversation , we will reach here that we should first see the picture of this story for what it is, and not reduce it to a misunderstanding or an accusation. what they have, no , they all want to close all the real shiite islamic centers in the west, then they will defame islam and close them. you see, when, for example, in hamburg, if one person has committed an offense , anyone, the head of the mosque, or anyone in charge of the mosque, has committed an offense. take him to the court to prove that he did this wrong