starts at 6 p.m. and then at nine and 10 p.m. five lucky members will play for a chance to win $25,000 in cash. club members start earning tickets now. don't miss out only at river rock casino, just 20 minutes north of santa rosa. >> is that your new nissan rogue? yeah. >> crazy story. so this morning i'm at the nissan thrill of summer sales event, taking a test drive. when dave's like, these cars are going fast. >> hurry in for memorial day savings. now nissan offers six vehicles starting >> announcer: "this week" with george stephanopoulos starts right now. >> george: historic verdict. >> their deliberations led them to a unanimous conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt. >> george: donald trump found guilty on 34 criminal counts in manhattan. the first president convicted of a felony. >> we're going to be appealing this scam. we're going to be appealing it on many different things. >> george: trump set to be sentenced just days before the gop convention.

his party stands by him. the former president now campaigning as a convicted criminal. how will voters respond? >> the justice system should be respected, and we should never allow anyone to tear it down. >> the real verdict is going to be november 5th by the people. >> george: we cover the unprecedented legal and political fallout this morning with trump's lawyer, will scharf, democratic governor wes moore, plus analysis from our legal experts and powerhouse round table. >> george: good morning, and welcome to "this week." in 1774, john adams said, representative government and trial by jury are the heart and lungs of liberty. 250 years later, the heart and lungs of liberty are facing what may be the ultimate stress test. 12 anonymous jurors rendered their verdict on thursday finding donald trump guilty on all counts. it's the third time in the last two years that jurors have rendered verdicts against trump.

jurors have yet to consider charges against trump for even more serious crimes, blocking the peaceful transfer of power, concealing classified documents, encouraging the false electors. for now, the jurors have already presented their fellow citizens with a choice. do we want to be represented, to be led for the first time in history by a convicted felon? that answer will come in november. this morning, we analyze all the fallout from this week's historic decision starting with senior investigative correspondent aaron katersky. good morning, aaron. you were at the courthouse every single day. paint that scene on thursday. >> i think it was around count four when former president trump realized the gravity of the moment, george. he had been laughing and joking with his attorneys because everybody thought the jury was going to go home for the day. the judge, ready to dismiss them and then he came back out on the bench and announced that the jury had reached a verdict, and he became a convicted criminal from the moment the foreman in his soft, irish lilt, pronounced guilty, and it took ten minutes to go 34 minutes count by count,

and that's when former president trump shut his eyes and subtly shook his head as if to block out what was happening to him. >> george: so what happens next? we have sentencing on july 11th. >> sentencing on july 11th, and the former president is taking something of a risk by continuing to attack the judge because at sentencing, judge juan merchan has full discretion to consider trump's remorse, whether he's shown remorse and respect for the law, and before any of that happens, he sits with the probation department which is almost unimaginable. >> george: but for this kind of a crime, a first-time offender, almost 80 years old, unlikely he's going to face any jail time. >> it seems unlikely. i can't wrap my head around a former president of the united states going to prison, and there's almost no precedent for anyone convicted of felony falsification of business records being sentenced to prison time, but there is one

caveat here, and that's the way the case was charged. trump was accused of falsifying the records to cover up a conspiracy in order to mess with the 2016 election. no other defendant has ever been charged with falsification to subvert democracy. >> george: even before we get to the actual sentencing, the former president has to undergo a presentencing investigation. what do we know about that? >> that's with the probation department, and i -- i'm not sure how deep they're going to be able to go with donald trump, his lawyers may try to limit it, but in theory, the probation department is supposed to get a window into your entire personal, familial, and financial history before making a pronouncement on what the sentence should be, and giving that recommendation to the judge. this would be the first time anyone has dug that deep into donald trump. >> george: aaron katersky, thank you very much. rachel scott is covering the campaign. we've seen trump lash out and his supporters fall in line. >> reporter: a defiant fury. in a speech at trump tower, he

did lash out at the judge and called him a devil. as aaron pointed out, many are questioning why the former president would go after the very judge that is responsible for deciding his fate with sentencing now just a few weeks away. there are also questions this morning about whether the former president violated the gag order by going after his former fixer and friend, michael cohen, calling him a sleaze bag, but this morning, the republican party falling in line standing behind the former president, even though who have been critical of him in the past. president biden speaking for the first time insisting that this verdict should be respected, and blasting the republican efforts to undermine the verdict calling that dangerous, george. >> george: and rachel, we have a new poll out this morning with ipsos that gives at least some early indications of how americans may be receiving the verdict? >> reporter: yeah. early indications. this is our new abc news/ipsos poll. it was taken after the verdict was reached, and it's a little bit of a mixed bag here, george. so 50% of americans believe that the guilty verdict of donald trump was, in fact, correct, but

then on the other end of this, you have 47% of americans who believe that the charges brought against the former president were politically motivated. the bottom line here, we are five months out from the election, and these are still two deeply unpopular candidates with trump's favorability rating sitting at 31%. president biden not much higher at 32%. >> george: and rachel, among those voters who dislike both candidates, though the poll seems to show that there's some impact of the verdict? >> reporter: still some impact of the verdict, but 65% of those who don't like either of the candidates believing that this was actually correct and still a large amount of those voters also believe that the former president should be ending his presidential campaign, george. >> george: rachel scott, thanks very much. let's bring in one of former president trump's attorneys, will scharf. thanks for joining us. there's a lot i want to get to. one of the things i want to begin with is what aaron katersky was talking. is the president going to fully cooperate? >>est he's going to fully cooperate with the investigation. i think this verdict is replete

with reversible error. we plan to vigorously appeal this all the way up to the supreme court if necessary. >> george: on thursday, you praised the jury. you said that they were concerting the law and the evidence seriously and you predicted a just verdict. do you accept their decision now? >> no. i think when you look at the jury instructions here, judge merchan essentially, i wouldn't say rigged the deliberations, but certainly steered the jury towards the verdict that he clearly wanted. we're going to be challenging judge merchan's failure to recuse on appeal. i think it constitutes a clear due process violation. we're obviously going to be challenging aspects of the jury instructions as well. i think there's a lot of appellate material there. >> george: that's quite a change for you. before the verdict came out, you said the jury instructions are quite favorable to your side. do you think you made a mistake?

>> i think hope for the best, plan for the best, george, but when you look at the totality, this is a prosecution that should have never been brought. this was a case brought in front of a judge that clearly should have recused. i think we have a lot of fair complaints with the way this trial was conducted and i think ultimately, president trump will be vindicated on appeal. >> george: the ethics panel said the judge was not required to recuse. >> i think when you look at binding supreme court precedent including most notably the seminal case on recusal, even the appearance of impropriety can require a judge to recuse for reasons of due process. here i think we have far more than an appearance of impropriety. the fact that judge merchan contributed to joe biden during the 2020 election, many of the other issues that we've raised in our recusal papers throughout this case. i think judge merchan should have clearly recused and i think that's going to be an issue that the appellate courts are going to have to deal with.

>> george: if appearance of impropriety is the standard of recusal, why shouldn't justice thomas and justice alito have to recuse from the supreme court? >> i think you're not talking about financial conflicts of interest. you're certainly not talking about a judge who's violated judicial code of conduct in terms of political contributions. i think that's frankly stunning speaking as a former attorney, former law clerk. i've never heard of a judge contributing to political candidates before. i've certainly never heard of a judge sitting in judgment over the opponent of the political candidate he contributed to. i think the american people see through this sort of thing. i think that's why president trump's poll numbers seem to be rising rather than falling. the trump campaign obviously smashed political fund-raising records including raising money from tens of thousands of new donors in the 24 hours after this verdict. i think the american people see this judgment for what it was, and we're certainly hopeful that on appeal, we can get it thrown out because of how wildly unjust it is. >> george: again, the ethics panel had all the evidence that you had and they decided that

there was not a conflict there, but let's move on. on -- several legal experts have criticized the way the trump legal team handled this trial. was it a mistake for the former president not to testify? >> i think in light of the -- judge merchan's decision about the scope of allowable cross-examination which i believe was wildly wrong, i think it would have been dangerous for president trump to take the stand, but i think had president trump taken the stand, certainly on direct, he would have been a compelling witness. i continue to believe, as most americans believe that president trump did absolutely nothing wrong here. certainly nothing illegal, and certainly not rising to the level of this conviction. so i think that was a decision that was made in light of the way that judge merchan was handling these proceedings. >> george: absolutely nothing wrong? 12 jurors said he clearly falsified the business records and did it to an advanced conspiracy. >> i believe that verdict is not supported by anything even close to proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and again, we're going to be vigorously challenging this

verdict on appeal. we think we have ample grounds to. i think some of judge merchan's evidentiary decisions were frankly astounding. not allowing brad smith to testify the way he wanted. this is one of the world's leading experts on federal election law, limiting the scope of examination of robert costello who i believe had absolutely damning information about the prosecution's case, on decision after decision after decision, judge merchan, i think departed from normal courtroom procedure, normal courtroom to essentially stack the deck against president trump, and these are all issues we're going to raise on appeal. we're going to raise them vigorously, and we believe that we're going to win. >> george: another criticism that has been labeled against the trump legal team was that it was a mistake not to acknowledge the relationship with stormy daniels and they say that put the president's defense up against a wall. >> i think the truth needed to come through. i think that president trump has

consistently denied this affair. stormy daniels previously denied this affair. i don't think that lying about what happened would have helped anything here, but again, i just completely disagree with the premise of that question. >> george: the former president has called the judge a tyrant and a devil. do you agree with that? >> as i've said repeatedly during this interview, george, i think judge merchan should have recused. i think he was biased and i think that came through in decisions throughout the conduct of this trial, whether it's evidentiary decisions, but again, i think the decision not to recuse in light of the severe appearance of impropriety, i believe actual conflict of interest between judge merchan and the defendant he was sitting in judgment over. it's head-scratching to be honest that he didn't step down off of this case. >> george: are you concerned that the continuing attacks on judge merchan and the attacks on witnesses like michael cohen is going to actually make sentencing worse for the former president? >> i think it's really important note that president trump is running for president of the united states of america, and he has an absolute constitutional right to comment on matters of

public importance, and unfortunately this trial which was, i believe, unjustly inserted into the presidential election cycle, is a matter of tremendous public importance. the weaponization of our legal system, the politicalization of prosecution, these are all things that president trump absolutely has to comment on. i think the fact that he labored under a gag order as long as he did was manifestly unjust. so yes, absolutely. president trump needs to be carrying his message to the american people, and i don't see how anyone can really poke holes at that. >> george: you talked about the weaponization of the legal system. of course, it was former president trump who threw tout the 2016 chants of lock her up against hillary clinton, but what do you expect of the sentencing process? >> hold on, george. he may have said that, but after he entered office, he didn't weaponize the department of justice to pursue his political opponents the way we've seen president trump and his political allies act in the last couple of years. remember, this case in new york, it was called the zombie case.

it sat and at and sat. it could have been brought at any point after 2020, and then suddenly when president trump announced his campaign for president, was dusted off, rushed in front of a grand jury and rushed into court. you want to talk about the politicalization of the legal system, this is exhibit a. it's unprecedented in american history. it's not the way our campaigns are supposed to be run. we can test elections at the ballot box, not in the courts in this country. >> george: that is true, but of course, we have never had a former president or presidential candidate facing the kind of charges that the president faced because of his own activities and of course, the attorney general of manhattan has nothing to do with the department of justice. finally, what do you expect from the sentencing process? >> i vehemently disagree that the defense attorney in new york has not politically motivated here, and i vehemently disagree that president biden and his political allies aren't up to their necks in this prosecution. >> george: there's no evidence of that sir. i'm not going to let you continue to say -- there's zero evidence of that.

>> he was standing over alvin bragg's shoulder when he announced this verdict. i mean, he was the number three official in the biden department of justice who suddenly disappears and shows up as an assistant district attorney right as trump's case -- >> george: after the decision was made -- >> you want to talk about political courts. >> george: this has nothing do -- no, it's not. this has nothing to do with president biden. do you want to answer the question about the sentencing process or not? >> i completely disagree that this has nothing to do with president biden. with respect to sentencing as i said before, we're going to vigorously challenge this case on appeal. i don't think president trump is going to end up being subject to any sentence whatsoever, and we look forward to getting this case into the next court, and taking this, again, all the way up to the u.s. supreme court if n necessary to vindicate president trump's rights. >> george: thanks for your time this morning. >> appreciate it, george. >> george: let's bring in our legal panel. dan abrams, and sarah isgur, and let me begin with you. we talked a lot about what to

expect from the jury. we were both surprised by how clear the result finally was. >> i expected there would be some form of a hung jury. why? because i thought that there would be some jurors who might look at why the case was brought, whether the case should have been brought. that's not something jurors are supposed to look at, but i thought that they might be questioning that. as we've seen in some other high-profile political trials where you've seen a hung jury. here it was a quick verdict. it was clear there was not a lot of dissent on that jury, and quickly coming to a conviction. >> george: were you surprised? >> so i went into it thinking there would be a conviction, but about halfway through, i thought a hung jury by was more likely because i did not think the prosecution had presented sufficient evidence on some of those elements about trump's actual involvement and putting in those records. the jury obviously disagreed. >> george: let's talk about appeal. we just heard the president's lawyer there talk about the grounds. they're going to make two big points. judge merchan should have

recused himself, and the evidence was faulty. >> he won't get anywhere. it's because of the small donation. why not just recuse yourself as many judges would? you're not going to win an appeal with that. you're not going to get a case overturned and i actually think in the end, judge merchan's rulings were actually pretty fair on both sides. there were a lot of cases where judge merchan refused the prosecution's requests to introduce evidence. >> george: the "access hollywood" tapes. >> other women. when it came to jurors, et cetera, but on the second question of the jury instructions, there's some real appellate issues here that are serious questions about why didn't the defense even know what the charge was that they were going to be applying. what law was going to be applied. >> george: which was three underlying lies. >> there were a lot of questions for the defense going into this i think as they were making their closing arguments, not even knowing sort of what the law they were going to be

battling over was. so do i think they're going to win an appeal? i don't know, but there are real legal issues but we need to separate that from the sort of moral and political questions. >> i think we're heading into the worst case scenario which is donald trump is convicted at trial. he maybe loses the election closely. we see some shift in the polls in the next month or two, and then the question for the appellate court of whether to overturn this becomes much trickier from a larger sort of almost cultural standpoint, you know, we saw this with ted stevens' trial, a senator who was convicted right before his election. he loses an incredibly close race, and then afterwards the judge said it was the worst case of prosecutorial misconduct he'd ever seen, and it's overturned. to overturn this conviction, we'll have huge >> george: i guess i take your point on this case, but if he loses the election in your scenario, he's going to be facing trials for overturning the election, concealing classified documents, and facing a trial in georgia.

those are far more serious issues. >> and they're more compelling cases. this is the problem with this case going first. it was the legally weakest, most difficult case to win on appeal. obviously the most politically motivated in the eyes of most americans. this is the robert jackson fear that prosecutors will pick who they should get instead of what cases should be prosecuted and i think people have a fair complaint when it comes against donald trump because it was because -- brought because he was donald trump, because they hated him politically, and the hunter biden case starts tomorrow. >> you can argue the case shouldn't have been brought because he's guilty. you don't have to pick between the two. you can say, i don't think that based on this fact pattern anyone else would have been charged here, and as a result, when you're talking about the former president, i don't think they should have moved forward with it. that was the position i took going into it, but then you look at the evidence, the technical question in this case for the jury was a separate one, which is, based on the law, do you think it was violated?

and the answer to that can also be yes. you can have both things. >> george: how about sentencing, sarah? >> i don't think he'll be sentenced to jail time, but i do think that the one problem as aaron pointed out, you know, this -- there isn't really good precedent for any of this because you have such a high-profile case and part of the way judges think about sentencing is deterrence. there's a real deterrent value to throw the book at donald trump in a way this you wouldn't under different circumstances. >> anyone that tells you, in all the cases i've seen, you can throw that all way. this is a ewe -- unique case. there's judge has complete and total discretion here, and the sentencing would be anything to nothing, to community service. there could be home confinement or probation. but to look to other cases and say, well, in typical -- i don't think -- >> george: i completely agree with that. before we even get to that point

as i discussed with aaron, we have this whole issue of the probation department's investigation. hard for me to imagine, sarah, and of course, you worked for the former president, how he's going to deal with this investigation. >> it'll be interesting because behind closed doors, you know, maybe he won't be super happy about it, but when the cameras are off, he can be quite different about all of this stuff and just want to get it out of way. he's very different when the cameras are on because that's how people are judging whether he's strong or weak. this is all going to happen outside of our view, and we'll see some truth socials about it. >> it's a lot of personal questions, right? >> george: health records. >> it really just gets into everything about who you are, right? it's going to be interesting to see if trump's lawyers try to restrict the kinds of questions -- >> george: health records, financial records, divorces. >> all of to it becomes part of -- because what the probation department is doing is trying to present a complete picture to the judge, who this person is, and what this sentence is.

>> george: we'll see that, correct? >> usually the judge certainly gets it, and then very -- usually it's made public. we'll see. >> george: thank you both very much. up next, how will trump's guilty verdict impact the 2024 race? wes moore weighs in. we're back in two minutes. guilty verdict impact the 2024 race? wes moore weighs in. we're back in two minutes. carin is about to retire. here's what's going into her retirement. there's us. she raised us on her own. ten years as my roller derby wife. three. three schools she's opened. she's a mother. i think we turned out alright. she's a friend. our mother's could tell stories. she's a teacher. she may be retiring but she's not done. i'm never gonna stop! retirement is the sum of your life's work. now what? get income for life and protect your life's work with prudential. nexium 24hr prevents heartburn acid for twice as long as pepcid. get all-day and all-night heartburn acid prevention with just one pill a day.

choose acid prevention. choose nexium. can neuriva support your brain health? mary, janet, hey!! (thinking: eddie, no frasier, frank... frank?) fred! how are you?! fred... fuel up to 7 brain health indicators, including your memory. join the neuriva brain health challenge. (man) every time i needed a new phone, i had to switch carriers... (roommate) i told him...at verizon, everyone can get the best deals, like that iphone 15 on them. (man) switching all the time...it wasn't easy.

(lady) 35! (store customer) you're gonna be here forever. (man) i know. (employee) here is your wireless contract. (man) do i need a lawyer for this? those were hard days. representative. switch! now that i got a huge storage and battery upgrade... i'm officially done switching. (vo) new and existing customers get iphone 15 on us when they trade in any iphone, any condition. guaranteed. (man) i really wished you told me sooner. (roommate) i did. >> thousands of people donating right now to donald trump who have never once ever donated to our campaign, period, ever. that speaks volumes about how the american people are interpreting this. november is coming, and our verdict will officially be rendered on november the 5th. >> george: that was lara trump right after the verdict. we're joined by wes moore. governor, thank you for joining us this morning. let's start with your response to lara trump. are you concerned this verdict will help the former president? >> no. i think the american people have just gotten a bird's-eye view on

how over these past months how these two individuals deal with trials. you know, you look at president biden and the trials that he has had to deal with, things like deadly storms in the midwest, trials like addressing the fact that this criminalization of cannabis has been used as a cajole against so many communities, particularly communities of color for so many years, a bridge collapse in baltimore, a deadly bridge collapse where we have been able to get the federal channel reopened faster than anyone thought imaginable, and on the other side, you see donald trump who's been dealing with trials as well, except those trials have been his own. those trials have been criminal convictions and i think you're seeing a very clear example of what it means to have a president who is focusing on our

future, on our freedoms, and on the other side, you see donald trump who's frankly spending this time on his own future and freedoms. >> george: your former governor and predecessor, larry hogan drew an immediate response from the trump campaign. chris lacivita saying, you just ended your campaign. what do you make of that exchange? what will it mean for the senate campaign? he's now running for senate in the state of maryland. >> well, i think the old governor is learning that this is going to be a challenging race for him because as james baldwin said, you know, i can't believe what you say because i see what you do, and whether it's on the issues of reproductive health where he's now taken multiple positions in masking the fact that he has not been a champion of reproductive health or choice in our state, whether it's a position of violence where during his position as governor, homicide rates exploded. 300-plus homicides since our administration has come on board, we have been able to work together to cut the homicide rate in baltimore by half, and during his time as governor, he did not have a single solution

for the rise in bloodshed that we are seeing in baltimore and other places around the state, and i think the old governor is learning very quickly that it's difficult to run a race when -- when it was mitch mcconnell that brought in to be able to run this race, and as people are focusing on freedoms of reproductive health freedom, freedom to be able to learn and have your history respected, to be able to walk safely in your neighborhoods, that this is going to be a very challenging environment for him and frankly a very challenging campaign against -- running against someone who i supported early and proudly supported early, the executive angela. >> george: there is a debate going on in circles about how to take on the fact that he is a convicted felon. where do you stand on that? >> well, i think that, you know, and i hear the argument that people are saying now that him being a convicted felon is actually going to help him, and particularly how that's going to help him in communities of color

and african american communities, and i can tell you not just as the -- not only the third african american ever elected governor in the history of this country and the first elected in the history of my state, this is a very -- it's a deeply problematic and a deeply offensive argument. what is going to resonate with the african american community and what's going to resonate with the community as a whole is having a person, having a president like we have in president biden who's focusing on our futures. the fact that president trump is now a convicted felon does not make him resonate with any community. it does not make him more connectible to anybody else. >> george: how do you explain why president biden is falling so far short with african american voters this time around and what can he do about it? >> well, i think we also need to

be careful on putting too much weight in the polls that are six months out. if you looked at polls in my race when i was six months out, you know, i was polling in the margin of error of zero, and we ended up winning with more votes than anyone who's ever run for governor in the history of the state of maryland. the way you're going to win races is you've got to be able to go in communities and see things on the ground. we knew we were going to win this race even when the polls weren't showing it because i could tell the energy that we were seeing on the ground, and just last week, you know, i was in pennsylvania with the president. before that, we were in georgia campaigning on behalf of the president. north carolina next week and you're seeing surrogates from around the country who are now campaigning on behalf of the president and the things we're seeing are pretty universal, that the energy is there, that people are seeing that we have a president who has done things like making cannabis, moving it from schedule 1 to schedule 3, being able to address this long-term battle that we have had with cannabis particularly in communities of color, that we now have the highest rate of new start black-owned businesses started that we've seen in 30 years, that the black

unemployment rate is the lowest that it's ever been in recorded history. we have a president who's addressing the systemic challenges that oftentimes have held back communities of color, and i think that is going to resonate. i think it is resonating, and i think you just have to get in the community and on the streets and by that time, you'll see in november people will rally because his message will resonate. >> george: governor, thanks for your time this morning. >> thank you. >> george: up next, white house national security spokesman john kirby with the latest on gaza and ukraine. we'll be right back. onal securin kirby with the latest on gaza and ukraine. we'll be right back. (fisher investments) at fisher investments we may look like other money managers, but we're different. (other money manager) how so? (fisher investments) we're a fiduciary, obligated to act in our client'' best interest. (fisher investments) so we don't sell any commission-based products. (other money manager) then how do you make money? (fisher investments) we have a simple management fee, structured so we do better when our clients do better. (other money manager) your clients really come first then, huh? (fisher investments) yes. we make them a top priority, by getting to know their finances, family, health, lifestyle and more. (other money manager) wow, maybe we are different. (fisher investments) at fisher investments, we're clearly different. can neuriva support your brain health? mary, janet, hey!!

(thinking: eddie, no frasier, frank... frank?) fred! how are you?! fred... fuel up to 7 brain health indicators, including your memory. join the neuriva brain health challenge. ♪ imagine a future where plastic is not wasted... but instead remade over and over... into the things that keep our food fresher, our families safer, and our planet cleaner. to help us get there, america's plastic makers are investing billions of dollars to create innovative products and new recycling technologies for sustainable change. because when you push for smarter solutions, big things can happen. type 2 diabetes? discover the ozempic® tri-zone. ♪ ♪ i got the power of 3. i lowered my a1c, cv risk, and lost some weight. in studies, the majority of people reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. i'm under 7. ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as stroke, heart attack, or death

in adults also with known heart disease. i'm lowering my risk. adults lost up to 14 pounds. i lost some weight. ozempic® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't share needles or pens, or reuse needles. don't take ozempic® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. gallbladder problems may occur. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. living with type 2 diabetes? ask about the power of 3 with ozempic®.

too many innocent people have been killed including thousands of children. far too many have been badly wounded. it's time to begin this new stage. the hostages to come home, for israel to be secure, for the suffering to stop. it's time for this war to end. >> george: that was president biden calling on hamas to agree to a ceasefire deal with israel. white house communications adviser john kirby joins us. thank you for joining us as always. let's begun with the proposal the president laid out there

this week. israel has said that this was something they agreed to, but their conditions have not been met. where does this stand exactly? >> well, it is an israeli proposal, one that they arrived at after intense diplomacy whether our own national security team, and over at the state department. it is a phased approach, george. so where we are right now is that proposal, an israeli proposal has been given to hamas. it was done on thursday night, our time. we're waiting for an official response from hamas. we would note that publicly hamas officials came out and welcomed this proposal. so what would you hope to happen is they would agree to start phase one as soon as possible, and phase one would allow for some hostages, the elderly, sick, women hostages to get out over a period of six weeks. no fighting. more humanitarian assistance in, and while that's all going on, the two sides would sit down and try to negotiate what phase two could look like and when that could begin. >> george: based on what we're hearing from prime minister netanyahu, are we in a situation where if hamas says yes, israel will say no?

>> no. this is an israeli proposal. this was transmitted to them, and israel would say yes. again, all you get is a yes right now and it's not a small thing. what you get is the start of phase one. so you get some hostages coming out, initial hostages. you get some calm, more humanitarian assistance, up to 600 trucks and then you start to talk about phase two. prime minister netanyahu's team, and his foreign minister just said that they welcome this announcement by the president, and they did, in fact, agree that this was their proposal. >> george: the president said hamas is no longer capable of carrying out large-scale terror attacks. is that based on new u.s. intelligence, and do the israelis agree? >> it is based on accumulation of our own intelligence assessments across the intelligence agencies that

militarily speaking hamas is in no position to conduct another attack like october the 7th. we're not saying hamas has been wiped off the face of the map. we're not saying that hamas has no military capabilities. we've not said they don't still represent a viable threat to the israeli people. of course, they do, but they don't have the military capabilities to do what they did on the 7th of october. from a military perspective only, as president biden said, the israelis have accomplished most of their goals in gaza. >> george: let me ask you about ukraine, the president reversed his previous position and granted ukrainians permission to strike inside russia with u.s. weapons. are you worried that will draw the u.s. into direct conflict? that was the president's concern before. >> we have been concerned about escalation since the very beginning of this war and those concerns remain valid. the president has said he does not want to be responsible for starting world war iii. we're not looking for a conflict with russia, another nuclear

power. the ukrainians are faced with an incredible amount of pressure in kharkiv, not far from the russian border. they asked for limited power to use this. we're talking about military placements, gun placements, and logistic staging places that the russians were using to create buffer zones to continue to pond kharkiv. the president looked at that, and talked to the agency team, and understood all the ramifications of the request and approved it. it is limited to the kharkiv region, and it is limited with respect to the kind of targets they can hit and how far back they can go. >> george: it was part of a pattern to the president refusing at first to provide ukraine with certain munitions, and have those delays prolonged the war and put ukraine in a tougher position? president zelenskyy seems to suggest that. >> the delay that most prolonged this war and made things difficult was the delay in the congress, george. when we had a supplemental request submitted in october of

last year, and for six months congress did nothing to get us the kinds of funding we needed to supply ukraine, and for six months basically the ukrainians got nothing from the united states. the biggest contributor of security assistance. in just a month or so since that supplemental was passed, i would remind you that we submitted five security assistance packages to ukraine to get them the capabilities they need. as for the other argument about the creeping nature of this, what we have done is as the war has changed in character over the last two-plus years, our support has evolved. in the beginning they needed stinger and air missiles and now they need air defense and long-range capabilities and we continue to provide those capabilities, again, as the war has changed. as putin has changed his operational strategy. >> george: finally, former president trump said this morning on fox news that the world is out of control and laid the blame on president biden because he said world leaders don't respect president biden. your response? >> well, i don't get into

election campaign rhetoric. i can't do that. i can just tell you that everywhere the president goes, and he will hear this message -- i have no doubt when we go to france next week for the d-day commemoration and the state dinner with president macron and the g7, he will continue to hear from american leaders as he has heard that they welcome american leaders on the world stage and they appreciate the way the president has revitalized our alliances around the world and how we have stood up to aggression, whether that's putin, whether that's what hamas has done to the israeli people or the tensions that china has created in the indo-pacific. it's widely known around the world that president biden stands with allies and partners and stands for american leadership and he'll hear that again i'm sure this week. >> george: john kirby, thanks as always for your time. >> you bet. >> george: round table is up next. we'll be right back. your time. >> you bet. >> george: round table is up next. we'll be right back. or the family hauler... he needs to protect it. this father's day, give him the gift of weathertech. from laser-measured floorliners and cargo liner to keep his interior pristine.

to seat protector to guard against stains and sunshade to block harmful uv rays. the cupfone perfectly secures his phone while driving. order these american made products or a gift card at wt.com. happy father's day! an alternative to pills, voltaren is a clinically proven arthritis pain relief gel, which penetrates deep to target the source of pain with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medicine directly at the source. voltaren, the joy of movement. you are bountiful. your bones can support two times your weight. it's in your nature to stand strong. your cells renew every 27 days.

it's in your nature to glow. your digestion can improve by laughing with friends. it's in your nature to thrive. your body is brilliant. from your head to your heels. we're just here to supplement you. nature's bounty. it's in your nature. (♪) when life spells heartburn... how do you spell relief? r-o-l-a-i-d-s rolaids' dual-active formula begins to neutralize acid on contact. r-o-l-a-i-d-s spells relief. with schwab investing themes™, it's easy to invest in ideas you believe in. spot a trend in electric vehicles? have a passion for online gaming? or want to explore the space economy? choose from over 40 themes, each with up to 25 stocks identified by our unique algorithm. buy it as-is or customize to align with your goals. all at your fingertips. schwab investing themes. 40 customizable themes. up to 25 stocks in just a few clicks.

♪ >> george: the round table is all here. we'll be right back. >> george: the round table is all here. we'll be right back. >> george: the round table is lans built just for you. all here. we'll be right back. for just $30 bucks a line. that's a 45% savings versus verizon and at&t! plus, get one of the latest 5g phones free when you add a line. experience it all on america's largest and fastest 5g network. at t-mobile, customers 55 and up can get two lines of unlimited for only $30 bucks a line. switch today!

[♪] if you're only using facial moisturizer in the morning, for only $30 bucks a line. did you know, the best time for skin renewal is at night? olay retinol24 renews millions of surface skin cells while you sleep. wake up to smoother, younger-looking skin with olay retinol24. patients who have sensitive teeth but also want whiter teeth, they have to make a choice- one versus the other. new sensodyne clinical white, it provides 2 shades whiter teeth as well as providing 24/7 sensitivity protection. patients are going to love to see sensodyne on the shelf. pain means pause on the things you love, but... green... means... go!

♪ cool the pain with biofreeze. and keep on going. biofreeze. green means go.

if she were to win this election, it would create an unprecedented constitutional crisis. in that situation, we could very well have a sitting president under felony indictment and ultimately a criminal trial. it would grind government to a halt. >> george: donald trump in 2016. time for the round table with donna brazile, reince priebus, julie pace, and politico's senior political columnist, jonathan martin. i'll begin with you, reince. we have a sitting president who was facing felony indictments. donald trump now facing three felony indictments right now and he's now been convicted. he's a convicted felon.

why isn't that a constitutional crisis? >> well, because i think this is going to be up to the voters and the voters don't see it that way. >> george: i'm asking you as a representative of former president trump. >> i don't see it as a constitutional crisis. >> george: he did. >> i'm with those who said when alvin bragg decided in new york he's in the best situation to go after donald trump because he's done it over 100 times to his kids and that was one of the basis for his election, he made it political. joe biden made it political by sending robert de niro into manhattan. the district attorney chose to make it political and what's happening? what's happening is we've got an unbelievable united party $53 million came in the door. i spoke to the chairman of the rnc yesterday and i spoke to president trump yesterday and i asked him, is there anything

that you're seeing right now other than the headache of this conviction that isn't going to well in this campaign? and the answer is that this campaign, and where the republicans are situated today with donald trump as their candidate, is better today than it's ever been at any time. >> george: it doesn't bother you that donald trump is a convicted felon? >> not on this case, it doesn't. not on this case, it doesn't because this is a case just like your legal panel just debated, where smart lawyers, lawyers without political affiliation are saying that this case is flawed in many regards and an appeal is at least -- at least a doable appeal -- >> george: so it does bother you on the january 6th case? >> it could. but listen, i think this case is unique. i think that when you have a case where the statute of limitations has run, and this -- >> the spin is getting quite old.

>> it's not spin. >> the spin getting old. let's attack the legal system. let's attack the jury. let's attack judge. let's do everything but show remorse and contrition. that's why donald trump is -- was also held liable for defamation, accused of sexual assault. that's why he still has 54 convictions that he must get through, but i agree with one thing. the verdict will be rendered by the voters in november, in 157 days, but to have the presumptive nominee of one major political party facing jail time or facing probation, whatever it may be, whatever the judge may decide, it's a huge deal, and this is not the place for spin, and, you know, i want to say one thing about mr. bragg. mr. bragg was reluctant until he saw the facts. he was reluctant.

he didn't campaign on this like all of the other candidates running to replace d.a. vance. they ran on crime, to reduce crime, to focus on incarceration. they ran on real issues. he only made reference to mr. trump when his name came up. so i don't think we should demagogue these issues because i do believe that the president -- the former president needs to face the music even if you don't like the genre. >> george: we can say pretty much for certain that if a nominated party was a convicted felon, they would be pushed out by a party. >> it's enormous pressure to drop out of the race. the opposite has happened in this case because trump is completely the dominant figure in the gop and he broke no dissent whatsoever. we saw that again this week, but fact is that being a felon is not good for a campaign. it's not giving him things he doesn't already have. it fires up his base, but it's not growing his vote.

this is a margins election. the margins are in three states, wisconsin, pennsylvania, and maryland. this is going to hurt trump in those handful of states, especially with an important group of voters. those two aren't following this that closely, and all they hear and all they absorb is the top line. convicted felon. >> we saw that come out of poll that we were talking about earlier today where you do see these double haters. they don't like biden and they don't like trump and they are looking at that at least in initial surveys and they're looking at this, and saying, i don't like this. this isn't helpful, but jonathan's exactly right. we know how trump supporters are going to react to this. we know how republican elected officials are going to react to that, but it's going to be the

small number of voters in a couple of key instances who are not paying that much attention and this presents a challenge for the biden campaign and for biden himself, and what is their strategy? how do they approach this? how aggressive are they going to be, or how much do they let trump himself and some of these other legal issues he faces to drive this for them? >> biden's not comfortable with this kind of politics. he's a norms figure. >> yep. >> someone who's old-school, been in washington for a half century. he doesn't like leveraging this stuff, but a lot of folks in his party saying, this is your opening. two for it. >> i think you're missing one important point. so win these presidential elections and you're right, jonathan, it's going to come down to a few thousand votes up. need money and you need money and you need enthusiasm and when you can drive enthusiasm off the charts, you can win these elections. who's knocking the doors and who's doing the work on the ground to say, i'm going to go to war for this candidate?

when you compare the enthusiasm for donald trump against the enthusiasm for joe biden, there's no comparison, and this will pour fuel on the fire. >> it's difficult to get the crowd riled up when there's no primary. i think one of the problems and the challenges that the biden campaign is facing is that they have to energize. we didn't have a primary on the democratic side. y'all had a primary and your voters are energized. let me tell you something. there are many voters on the republican side including those independents or who lean republican who are second-guessing their decision to support donald trump because he's a convicted felon. >> george: what does this mean for the debates? >> i think it's going to make it very, very awkward to have, i think, more than one debate. look. we're apparently going to have here in june is extraordinary, and i think it speaks to the biden -- the biden white house recognizing he had to change the nature of this campaign, that this campaign before the conviction at least was not going that well for joe biden. he had to change that trajectory. i am really fascinated to see how that debate goes, and if the biden folks feel like they have gotten trump between the debate and this conviction back center of the camera frame if they want a second debate. >> this is one of the things that i think the biden campaign is trying to do. they do feel like there is this

whole conversation happening that donald trump is leading that a lot of voters are not seeing, and their belief has always been if they can get donald trump in front of more people -- >> exactly. >> that sounds a little crazy to talk about when you think about how often trump is talking, but he's not talking to a lot of these voters that are going to make the difference here, and this is their opportunity, but again, for biden, how much does he focus that debate on trump? how much does he want to talk about his own record? how much does he want to talk about the economy or the middle east? i think trump will try to put him on the spot on those issues perhaps more than biden will want to focus on them. >> and i think to that point, i think the debate is actually going to be very -- on a substance very bad for president biden because in the end this election is going to come down

to the economy, where we sit in the world, the border, inflation, and all the issues that are plaguing the biden campaign right now and these moderators are going to force those issues and the moderator isn't going to sit there and make this a discussion about, you know, whether trump's -- his convictions or whether biden's too old. they're going to talk about the issues. >> but reince, the perception of the felon versus the old man, that perception is what's driving this campaign. policy matters. those who issues are the question. do you want the felon or the old man? >> george: do you think the moderators won't bring up the felony? >> they'll bring it up, but you have to talk about the substantive issues. >> are you trying to help your children prepare for a future or trying to think about yourself and your own problems? this debate is about the future of the united states of america and while we talk about the two characters or the two individuals, it's really about the future of the country. it is about lowering crime and making sure that people can afford to -- we call it in louisiana, make groceries, buy groceries, and it is about whether or not we can stop the flow of migrants from the border, but it's about the quality of life. it's about climate change in a time we heard this may be the worst hurricane season in

memory. i think that joe biden has a case to make because he is focused on the american people, not himself. that's the difference in this race. >> but he can't break through. that's his problem. he hasn't been able to break through. >> the good news is there are 157 days and i would much rather have biden's record than trump's record. >> george: was it smart of the trump campaign to attack the senate candidate in maryland after talking about the jury? >> this is a long going feud between larry hogan and president trump, and i think what you see there is just a culmination of that argument. >> no. it wasn't smart? >> just racket it up that way. we're not fighting in maryland. we're not worrying about where maryland is going to go. >> yes, the senate. >> you might need to. if you want to take back the senate, you do need to worry about maryland. >> does it help larry hogan in maryland to be in a fight with trump or hurt him? it helps him. >> you can't have a political coalition in which you tolerate any critique of your party

leader even from the bluest of states. it speaks to the fragility of that coalition, and that's the challenge here, is that trump has a stranglehold on his coalition. the maga movement is strong as all get out, but it's not a 51% coalition, and this is the key point from this conviction this week. how does this get trump any more votes he didn't already have for the conviction? >> which is why trump is 20 points better today with voters under 30. he's 20 points better with hispanic voters. he's doing better with black voters in america. that coalition argument is one of the reasons why president trump is doing so well in spite of these issues that you're bringing up here. >> i think jonathan's point is you may see that in some of the polling right now. we've not seen that actually in an election. that is the challenge. >> we'll see. >> exactly. can we turn that into actual results in the election? >> and can joe biden make the campaign about donald trump and vice versa? whoever this campaign is about, that's who's going to lose. >> we have been arguing about this for a long time. the news is 24/7 trump.

he's either tied slight ahead or behind. if it's about trump, it hurts trump, that's not true. >> the good news is, again, 157 days and joe biden has an ability to bring that coalition together, you know, you mentioned that black voters and hispanic voters and young voters, they have been flirting with a new dance partner, but you know what? when they find out that the new dance partner is a convicted felon, they're going to run as far away from him as possible. >> george: that is the last word today. thank you all very much. we'll be right back. possible. >> george: that is the last word today. thank you all very much. we'll be right back.

you made a cow! actually it's a piggy bank. my inspiration to start saving. how about a more solid way to save? i'm listening. well, bmo helps get your savings habit into shape with a cash reward, every month you save. both: cash reward? and there's a cash bonus when you open a new checking account to get you started. wow. anything you can't do? ( ♪ ) mugs. ♪ bmo ♪ >> george: that is all for us today. thanks for sharing part of your sunday with us. check out "world news tonight," and i'll see you tomorrow on "gma." w on "gma."

espn welcomes you to a special presentation of the united football league on abc >> the ufl is presented by us army here in our nation's capital. we kick off the final