>> the u.n.'s top court has ordered israel too halt its offensive on gaza's southern city of rafah. >> president biden saying the u.s. would withhold arm shipments. >> narrator: in a special presentation... >> the international criminal court has announced it is seeking arrest warrants for israeli and hamas leaders

including prime minister benjamin netanyahu. >> charges of war crimes, and crimes against humanity. >> narrator: drawing on years of reporting... >> when hopelessness accumulates over decades. it's no longer just dangerous. it's catastrophic. >> he came out plain and simple and said there will not be a palestinian state. >> narrator: the lead-up to the hamas attack and the ongoing war. >> there's an israel before october 7th, and there is an israel after october 7th. >> they wanted this to happen so israel will react with force. the whole region is destabilized. >> narrator: now on frontline, netanyahu, america and the road to war in gaza. >> the next chapter in the gaza war could be the hardest one yet. >> frontline is made possible by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. and by the corporation for public broadcasting. additional support is provided by the abrams foundation,

committed to excellence in journalism... park foundation, dedicated to heightening public awareness of critical issues... the john d. and catherine t. macarthur foundation committed to building a more just, verdant and peaceful world more at macfound.org. the heising-simons foundation, unlocking knowledge, opportunity and possibilities. at hsfoundation.org. and by the frontline journalism fund, with major support from jon and jo ann hagler, and additional support from koo and patricia yuen, committed to bridging cultural differences in our communities. (overlapping news footage) >> ...taken hoste. young people at a music festival murdered in cold blood

by the radical islamic terrorists of hamas. >> retaliation already underway.... >> hamas unleashes a shocking assault on israel, leaving hundreds dead. >> the barbarism and the savagery stunning mankind. >> hamas taking hostages. >> israel responding, saying hamas will bear the consequences >> hamof the attack.ages. >> narrator: it was 11 days after hamas's attack on israel. benjamin netanyahu, israel's longest-serving prime minister, was at ben gurion airport to meet the american president. >> you could see that he was lost. he was lost. he understands that this is huge, huge tragedy for israel, but also for him as a part of israel's history. >> bibi netanyahu has always sort of prided himself on being mr. security. so for the worst day ever, for the most severe suffering of fatalities and casualties

in israel itself, for this to occur on his watch, it is a tragedy. >> he is now descending the stairs. >> we see president biden come down the stairs from air force one onto the tarmac, and he heads straight for netanyahu, and he wraps his arms around him. >> narrator: it was an expression of america's solidarity with israel, but it also carried a warning. >> it's called a bear hug, but in hebrew, a bear hug can mean wrapping your arms around somebody in order to restrain them as much as to comfort them. and that captured, i think, the dual goals of this trip, right? hug them-- "yes, we are with you"-- but caution at the same time-- "be careful." >> this is an extremely delicate journey now. >> narrator: israel had just begun its retaliation against hamas, and later that day, biden and secretarof state antony blinken took the unprecedented step of joining netanyahu's war cabinet

to discuss their plans and the escalating civilian toll in gaza. >> the fact that state secretary blinken and president den insist on sitting inside the israeli war cabinet, which never happened in the history of the relations between the two countries, this is the clearest example they just don't trusthem. they want to be there and make sure that things are not getting out of control. >> after 9/11, we were enraged in the united states. while we sought justice and got justice, we also made mistakes. >> it was a warning to netanyahu and to the israeli people, "don't make the mistake that we americans made after 9/11," which was to overreact, to do what our enemies wanted us to do, and to unleash a military conflict that causes us all sorts of additional problems.

>> narrator: months later, gaza is in ruins. >> prime minister benjamin netanyahu continues to push back against international calls for a ceasefire, saying... >> the problem is that no one knows what will needo happen (explosion booms) for israelis to feel satisfied that they've achieved their sted objective of having destroyed hamas. >> gaza has become a graveyard for children. >> narrator: tens of thousands of palestinians are dead. (children wailing) >> and so all that's left is to just keep killing and bombing and killing and bombing, until when? >> they've prioritized the hostages, rather than... >> narrator: with hamas still holding hostages, netanyahu has pushed ahead. >> from the israeli perspective, what matters right now is what happened october 7th. and how to somehow help correct this by reaching a full victory over hamas. >> narrator: and no tensions are mounting between the israeli prime minister and the american president who'd hugged in solidarity.

>> hugging netanyahu turns out to be a very risky strategy. there are many people who look at the situation, and say, "well, what has this bear hug gotten us?" >> the u.s. is pressing israel to shift to precise targeting of hamas leaders rather than widespread bombing and ground... >> narrator: for benjamin netanyahu, this moment of crisis is the culmination of a 30-year conflict over a failed peace process he has long resisted, over american pressure to come to terms with the palestinians... >> it's not gonna happen. >> narrator: ...and over the security of his country that he vowed to defend. with all this death and destruction, it's hard not to look back and say, "where did the, you know, road turn? "when did it become inevitable that we would head to this cataclysmic conflict?" the second guessing is haunting. ♪ ♪ >> preparations are underway. we expect to see the president shortly...

>> ...for what he called an historic and honorable compromise. >> narrator: thirty years ago: a hopeful moment in the conflict between israelis and palestinians. >> it's a day for optimism. >> narrator: two sworn enemies arrived at the white house to sign a peace agreement. >> the deal was struck in secret by the principals. >> narrator: israeli prime minister yitzhak rabin, a former general, represented israel. >> ...have now agreed to lay down their guns and... >> narrator: representing the palestinians, yasser arafat, the chairman of the palestine liberation organization. >> 25 years of armed conflict... >> this is a hioric breakthrough between israel and the p.l.o., two national movements competing for the same space, and for the first time, they're prepared to recognize each other. >> narrator: known as the oslo accords, supported by president bill clinton, it was designed to end years of violence by laying out a peace process, a deal that could give palestinians their own state and land captured by israel in the 1967 arab-israeli war. >> president clinton felt this was his baby. >> it charts a course toward reconciliation

between two peoples who have both known the bitterness of exile. >> narrator: on the white house lawn, the tensions were visible. >> to the last minute, there were issues. rabin is insisting that arafat can't come in a uni... anything that looks like a uniform. we're telling arafat, "don't even-- you can't come with a-- you don't bring a weapon." you know, he always had a pistol. "you don't bring a weapon to the white house." >> then, at a point, the president looks at rabin, and he says, "you're going to have to shake his hand." and rabin looked like someone had punched him in the stomach. and he stood there for a moment. this is a man he considered a terrorist all his life. (applause) >> narrator: and then the handshake. (cheers and applause) an image that would become iconic. >> these hands that shook knew nothing but to shoot:

the trigger, the bullets, the bombs, the fight. and the question to me is, can this handshake lead to the culture in the minds of palestinians and israelis that coexistence is possible, that peace is possible, to live and let live? (cheering, shouting) >> narrator: but, in israel, an outcry against the peace process had been building among the ultra-religious right wing and security-minded conservatives. (crowd shouting) the face of the opposition: a 43-year-old leader of the likud party) benjamin netanyahu, known as bibi. >> the p.l.o. islamic state, 15 minutes from jerusalem or five minutes from tel aviv, is a prescription not for peace, but for dangerous and renewed confct. (crowd shouting) >> narrator: week after week, netanyahu watched the protests build. (crowd shouting, woman screaming) >> we're demonstrating against the inability of the government

to maintain order in this country and to protect the rights of jews living in their own land! >> narrator: concerned a palestinian state would pose a security risk to israel, netanyahu maneuvered the growing anger into a political force. >> netanyahu saw a moment of betrayal and peril, and an agreement that would never and could never work. (crowd shouting) >> he did not believe in the possibility of a deal with the palestinians. he didn't trust them. he didn't like them, he doesn't... (crowd chanting) ...and he doesn't want to have a deal with them. he didn't want to have a deal with them. (siren blaring, explosion) >> suicide bomber boarded the bus some way back... >> narrator: at the time, among the palestinians, there was also a rising faction opposed to the peace process. >> the car bomb was aimed at killing the maximum number of israeli schoolchildren. >> narrator: a recently formed islamic militant group started setting off suicide bombs inside israel.

its name: hamas. (men chanting) >> when the oslo agreement is signed, most palestinians said, "let's give this a chance." but there was that core constituency among palestinians who said, "the peace process is a sham. "it can never succeed. only armed struggle can liberate palestine." and hamas became the embodiment of that sentiment. >> narrator: hamas's founding declaration called for the destruction of israel and condemned all attempts at negotiation. >> it was another test for the already strained middle east peace process. >> narrator: theirncreasingly brazen attacks would fuel israeli opposition to the peace talks and the rise of benjamin netanyahu. >> arafat is a very weak reed indeed. he gives cover to the hamas, he makes a pretense of fighting them, but effectively allows them to attack us with impunity. >> massive protests reinforced opposition to the... >> narrator: netanyahu's opposition movement reached a fever pitch in october 1995,

when tens of thousands crammed into the center of jerusalem. >> netanyahu (in hebrew): >> narrator: from a balcony overlooking zion square, he addressed the crowd. >> netanyahu (in hebrew): >> narrator: the crowd was with him as he attacked yasser arafat. >> netanyahu (in hebrew): (whistling, cheering) >> narrator: and then the government of yitzhak rabin. >> netanyahu (in hebrew): >> there's a really ugly character to it. the level of vitriol, the anger, the scope of these demonstrations, the kind of incitement, the portrayal of rabin, dressing rabin in nazi uniforms or putting a keffiyeh on him. (crowd chanting) >> crowd (in hebrew): >> there were moments when netanyahu was advised that, you know, there are real nutcases

in the national religious camp that, that we see, that we need to calm down. >> crowd (in hebrew): >> netanyahu never did that. he never did that, to his enormous discredit. >> (chanting): bibi! bibi! (cheers and applause) >> narrator: then, a month later, at the end of a rally of his own, yitzhak rabin was gunned down. (gunshots) (shouting, screaming) the assassin-- a right-wing israeli jew... >> one lone gunman was taken. >> narrator: yigal amir. >> truly shocking news from the middle east tonight. israel's prime minister yitzhak rabin has been assassinated. >> evening spent dreaming of peace turns into a national nightmare. >> narrator: outside the hospital, the crowd began to chant "bibi is a murderer."

(shouting) >> (chanting): bibi is a murderer! >> from tel aviv, where this evening there is... >> narrator: the sign says, "bibi, rabin's blood is on your hands." (shouting) >> an assassin has taken yet another world leader away from us. it was just after the biggest peace rally in tel aviv... >> narrator: rabin's widow blamed netanyahu for contributing to her husband's death... >> the assassination of yitzhak rabin has also produced shock in the palestinian community. >> narrator: ...and said so on worldwide television. >> your husband pointed the finger at mr. netanyahu, and said, "you must stop this incitement." >> yeah. >> to what extent do you blame mr. netanyahu and the likud for what has happened? >> i do, i do blame them. the rally in kikar zion in jerusalem that showed him in the uniform of a nazi. so, mr. bibi netanyahu, nowe can say from here to eternity, that you didn't support it and didn't agree with it, but he was there and he didn't stop it.

(siren blaring) >> narrator: netanyahu's close adviser at the time vehemently disagrees. >> the attempt to pin on him the murder of the prime minister (stammering): is a cheap political propaganda trick that was taken by his political opponents, mostly from the left, in order to delegitimize netanyahu as the political public and to delegitimize the positions of likud, uh... in the israeli open political debate. (man singing) >> your prime minister was a martyr for peace, but he was a victim of hate. >> narrator: after rabin's death, the peace process he had championed was in jeopardy. (speaking hebrew) his successor, shimon peres, would now try to win an election to keep it alive.

that meant facg bibi netanyahu, whose standing in the polls had fallen in the wake of the assassination. >> people who spoke to him in those days have said that he thought that his career was over. >> narrator: then, as election day neared... (loud explosion) >> ten kilograms of explosives reduced this commuter bus into a charred skeleton. >> narrator: hamas had struck again. the number 18 bus right through the heart of jerusalem. >> bombs packed with nails and shrapnel exploded in israel sunday, killing... >> there were some palestinian groups trying to make sure that... sabotaging of the peace process. "rabin was assassinated, let us stop the whole process." (loud explosion, siren blaring) >> this morning, the sound of sirens again interrupted the morning commute... >> narrator: six days later, the number 18 bus again. >> police combed the hellish wreckage for clues about a suspect... >> narrator: the bus bombings were part of

a series of hamas attacks that killed more than 60 people and injured hundreds. >> israelis did not, could not believe the morning news, another bloody sunday. >> a suicide bomber has once again blown up a city bus in jerusalem. >> and israelis lost faith in the process, in that process. one of the slogans that came from grass roots was, "this peace is killing us." >> we see terrorism exploding in our streets, literally. so the only thing that we can do is not to continue on a failed course. this is bound to lead to more and more terrorism. that's exactly what's been happening. >> narrator: netanyahu began to climb in the polls. >> he was able to speak to the masses and translate the horror of suicide bombers into political power, and say, "i will be able to solve this. am strong. "i come from a military background. "i have the experience and the spirit

to stop suicide bombers." >> there are many ways of fighting terrorism, but the first decision is to fight it. >> narrator: netanyahu had railed against the oslo accords and promised security to the growing number of israelis scarred by the violence. >> the difference between mr. netanyahu and the current... >> narrator: it worked. >> ... shimon peres is a mere fraction of one percent. >> benjamin netanyahu is on his way to the united states for his first visit since becoming israel's prime minister. >> benjamin netanyahu's dealings with the president of the united states will be of intense interest... >> narrator: just over one month later, prime minister netanyahu was at the white house. >> ...prime minister netanyahu will hold a joint news conference after they meet tuesday. >> narrator: behind closed doors, clinton would demand netanyahu continue the oo peace process and personally meet with yasser arafat. >> the situation there and elsewhere... >> narrator: it didn't take long for the meeting to become contentious. >> he came in pretty full of himself.

and he was pretty much telling the president how to deal with the arabs. he understood how to deal with the arabs. >> his sort of posture was, "let me tell you about the middle east." and he then proceeded to lecture the president on the realities of the middle east. "here's the way it is." ♪ ♪ >> netanyahu wanted to make clear that, you know, even though the previous government had signed the agreement, that he had some real reservations about it. and so, you know, i think that that's why it got off to a bad start. >> and so, you know, when the meeting's over, clinton turns and he says, "who does he think the superpower is?" (siren blaring in distance) >> narrator: under pressure from clinton, netanyahu agreed to a compromise gesture.

he would meet with yasser arafat. >> and i think there's a moment where netanyahu has to decide. can he try to block the actual implementation of the agreement but concede some things that clinton was pressing for in terms of an on-camera, for instance, handshake with arafat? i think that was the calculation. >> that day, i was there. and i was thinking, "how... how will this happen?" i was trying to do whatever i can to make sure that if needs to, i will employ every damage control mechanism, every crisis management, everything, and... >> narrator: it was a meeting netanyahu had insisted would never happen. >> very, very hard. very hard. he swore he would never shake arafat's hand. (camera shutters clicking)

>> narrator: once the handshakes started, they kept coming. and he took other steps. he pulled israeli troops out of a key city in the west bank, and signed a treaty agreeing to further implement oslo. but close observers say he was slow-walking the peace process. >> netanyahu is an ideologue, very deeply. in every step of his premiership, starting in '96, everything he's doing he's thinking, "how do i limit this thing? "how do i make sure i don't have to give back more land? "and if i do, what's the smallest area of concession that i can make?" (camera shutters clicking, journalists shouting) >> narrator: the compromises would prove fateful for netanyahu. >> nobody was happy with him. the left weren't happy with him for what he was doing to undermine oslo, and the right wasn't happy with him for what he was doing to keep oslo. he was in a sort of impossib balancing act. (crowd shouting)

>> (speaking hebrew): >> at that point, the prime minister's conservative base folds, and some people on the conservative right work with the israeli left to bring down prime minister netanyahu. (news theme playing) (newscaster speaking hebrew) >> narrator: in 1999, he'd lose his bid for reelection. but he'd take with him some key lessons. >> one, his view of democratic, liberal american presidents as the rival if not the enemy. two, the fact that concessions on the peace process could lead to his downfall. >> (speaking hebrew): (crowd shouting) >> narrator: netanyahu would spend the next several years working his way back into power.

>> israelis and palestinians in a last-ditch pitch for middle east peace. >> narrator: netanyahu watched as clinton brought his left-wing successor, ehud barak, and yasser arafat together at camp david for another peace effort that would have created a palestinian state in gaza and the west bank. among the difficult issues left unresolved was the control of jerusalem. >> when camp david happened, the palestinian team said, "we don't think the parties are prepared. the groundwork has not been done. i think the problem with clinton was that he believed that everything could just be undone with some magic wand. >> barak made a far-reaching offer, i think, went further than he was planning to do. but for arafat, it was unacceptable.

and he said, "if i accept this, you'll be... do you want to walk behind my casket?" that's what he said. >> i had a dinner with one of the former palestinian negotiators, and i won't name him because this was done in confidence. and he said to me, we and the delegation all wanted to accept it, and arafat just sort of blew us away. and he said, can you imagine where we would be today if we had said yes? and, you know, i think about that conversation often right now. (explosion) >> narrator: the failure of the deal at camp david set in motion a new round of frustration and violence on both sides. (gunfire) >> palestinians were fed up. there were years of failed negotiations.

security for them went backwards. freedom of movement went backwards. freedom of religion went backwards. the economy went backwards. and there was a point at which palestinians said, "enough. we are done with this process of negotiations." and so everything unravels. everything unravels. (explosion) >> that cycle of violence in which there were fairly high casualties on both sides, that definitely soured both publics-- israeli public and the palestinian public-- (loud rumbling) against the notion of a peaceful resolution. (people screaming in anguish) we see a rightward shift in israeli politics happening around that same time. and we also see a shift happening on the palestinian side where opponents of the peace process, violent opponents of the peace process, like hamas, are emboldened by the violence on the one hand,

but also the failure of negotiations. (explosion) (gunfire) >> narrator: by 2005, netanyahu was back at the center of the israeli government. he was finance minister in the administration of prime minister ariel sharon, who had a new plan for dealing with the palestinians: no negotiations; instead, a unilateral withdrawal of israeli settlements and troops from the gaza strip. >> the israelis concluded a long time ago that they didn't tually want gaza. you know, they weren't planning to annex it. they wanted to actually pull out of it. they're going to get the heck out. and it's up to the palestinians what they want to do with it at that point. >> (speaking hebrew) >> narrator: but netanyahu grew uneasy about the implications of handing ovegaza to the palestinians. he consulted a former military intelligence chief. >> netanyahu asked me what is my view, and i was totally against it. by evacuating all our forces,

we allow gaza to be an extreme country, which will be controlled by hamas. >> narrator: a week before the pullout, netanyahu resigned in protest. >> i cannot a partner to a move that i think compromises the security of israel. ♪ ♪ >> jewish settlers have until midnight tonight to get out of gaza or be removed by force. (people yelling) >> narrator: when the pullout happened, the army had to forcibly remove many israeli settlers from their homes, deeply dividing the country. >> this is just a trauma for the nation of israel, dividing their country, pitting the right wing against the army. >> narrator: in washington, president george w. bush had been pushing the palestinians to quickly take advantage of the moment and hold democratic elections.

>> mr. president, we will work with you to help realize the dream of a free and democratic palestine. >> narrator: the bush administration threw its support behind the palestinian leader, mahmoud abbas, who'd taken over since the death of yasser arafat. >> welcome back to the white house. >> narrator: abbas and his fatah party were unpopular among many palestinians who saw them as corrupt and ineffective. hamas decided to run against them. >> in 2006, when hamas runs, they run a disciplined campaign. the slogan was, "we'll provide good governance, we'll fight corruption, and islam is the answer." that's how they ran. >> it was open, free elections which were promoted by the united states of america, not by us. we didn't like the idea. but under the pressure of the americans, we did it. and hamas won. >> the sweeping victory by hamas

is being described as a political earthquake. already, though, aftershocks being felt in gaza. >> hamas's election victory in 2006 was a surprise to everyone, including hamas. (gunshots) hamas was designated by israel, by the united states and by many european countries as a terrorist organization. so this was not a government that they could deal with. (music playing) >> it showed the fraught consequences of a democracy agenda. sometimes democracy doesn't lead you to the results you actually want. >> as we've been reporting here, there's been a bloody and violent takeover of power in gaza. >> narrator: having won the election in gaza, hamas soon took complete control, driving out its rivals in a violent civil war. mahmoud abbas' fatah party retreated to the west bank city of rammallah. magaza would be hamas'srty retreatstronghold.est bank >> gaza becomes a fortress

for an organization whose founding charter talks about killing jews and eliminating israel. and they are now not just a terrorist organization in gaza, but the governing organization in gaza. and that means that the israelis have to figure out how to deal with them. >> the erez crossing point between gaza and israel is now barred to almost all palestinians. >> narrator: the israeli government imposed a blockade on gaza. it said it was trying to stop the group from bringing in weapons and prevent its fighters crossing into israel. >> the civilian population are facing increasing desperation and misery. but it also trapped the population. >> israel says that gazans will not starve on a more basic diet. >> the notion that you could keep two million people locked up indefinitely, with no real economy, who are entirely dependent on israel opening and closing the border to allow movement of goods and people in, where the majority of the people are now impoverished,

i think, was not only absurd but also quite cruel. (gunshots) because it depended on periodic, predictable eruptions of violence... (gunshots) ...that, from israel's standpoint, were acceptable. >> narrator: as netanyahu had predicted, within a year hamas was firing rockets and mortars into israel. israel responded with airstrikes. (explosions) it would become a recurring cycle. >> (speaking hebrew) >> narrator: by 2008 netanyahu was once again running for prime minister with a campaign slogan of "strong against hamas." >> he is a great politician, and he has understood the dna of the israeli public. he understands that you have to look them in the eye

and you have to say, "i'll keep you safe." >> benjamin netanyahu appears to have locked up the prime minister's office. >> narrator: he was re-elected amid growing fear of hamas attacks. but during the run up to his victory, a new president had entered the white house. >> (speaking hebrew) netanyahu was concerned. >> (speaking hebrew) >> i happened to be on a reporting trip in jerusalem, and i went into the coffee shop at the king david hotel. there was one other person there, and it was netanyahu sitting in a corner by himself reading newspapers. there was one thing in his mind. "who is this guy, obama? "who is he? what is he really like?" and he wanted very much to point out to me, as if i didn't know it, that obama's middle name was hussein and that his father was a muslim. what kind of objectivity

could this man bring to bear on israel? ♪ ♪ >> narrator: from his first day in office, president obama had set a new tone. (phone dialing) his first phone call was to mahmoud abbas. >> he started off by sending the right signals to palestinians. and i found that, um, very sincere, because he didn't need to make that phone call. >> narrator: later, for his first television interview, he chose an arab tv network. >> i have muslim members of my family. i have lived in muslim countries. my job is to communicate the fact that the united states has a stake in the well-being of the muslim world. it is my privilege to come here... >> narrator: and he signaled to palestinians and israelis

that he wanted to restart the peace process. (cameras clicking) >> history shows uthat strong and sustained american engagement can bridge divides and build the capacity that supports progress. >> narrator: in may 2009, he invited netanyahu to the white house. >> all right, everybody. just tell me when everybody's set up. great. well, listen, i first of all want to thank prime minister netanyahu for making this visit. >> narrator: obamaook a hard line with netanyahu. he pressed the prime minister on a key issue-- stopping the construction of israeli settlements in the west bank on land captured in the '67 war and claimed by the palestinians. >> it wasn't a request, it was a demand. and i think that this shocked netanyahu, shocked the people around netanyahu, and sort of gave proof to the people

who had been whispering in netanyahu's ears that this guy is up to no good. >> settlements have to be stopped in order for us to move forward. that's a difficult issue. i recognize that. but it's an important one and it has to be addressed. >> the signal he was sending to the israelis was one of, "i believe that this has to come to an end." they need to hear that they can't build israeli settlements any longer, that there has to be an end to it. >> narrator: for netanyahu, his first meeting with the president couldn't have gone worse. >> i think netanyahu recognized in obama suddenly a person who was hell-bent on setting up a palestinian state. >> they were better behaved than before. >> and i remember him coming back from his first meeting with president obama, something that tells him that it's going to be a different president, super-intelligent lawyer. he has a vision,

and something in what we in hebrew call a "neshama." the soul is too cold to be connected to israel. >> narrator: once again, netanyahu was at odds with an american president. obama's peace efforts over the next few years wouldn't be able to break the cycle of violence that had been raging between israel and the palestinians. >> israel is carrying out brand new airstrikes in the gaza strip today. >> new explosions in gaza, fresh israeli air strikes... >> sirens warn of another round of hamas rockets... >> narrator: but obama would double down. >> the president of the united states, barack obama. >> for six months, we have witnessed an extraordinary change taking place in the middle east and north africa. >> narrator: in 2011, amid the arab spring, he delivered a speech at the state department

that would be remembered for one line. >> we believe the borders of israel and palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps. >> narrator: that israel should return land it captured in the '67 war to form a palestinian state was a familiar demand, but one never endorsed so publicly by a u.s. president. >> it became the headline. the headline in "the new york times" was, "president obama endorses the '67 borders." the rest of the speech about the arab spring went virtually unreported. now, for israel, this was, um... this was a major development. >> netanyahu believes if you have a palestinian state in anywhere approximating the '67 borders, the potential for peace is zero, that the capacity for israel to maintain its security, even in the state it's in now, will be radically diminished. (plane engine roaring)

>> narrator: the white house had not briefed netanyahu. and as it turned out, he was planning a trip to washington the next day. >> from netanyahu's point of view, he was convinced that this was an attempt to ambush him, embarrass him. and put him in a situation where, you know, the president was, was from netanyahu's point of view, weakening israel's negotiating position by declaring a stance on the '67 lines. and so he was furious about it. >> narrator: when netanyahu landed, his ambassador could tell there would be trouble. >> i've never seen him like that coming out of the plane. there was no smile. there was no wave. and you can almost imagine steam coming out of his ears. >> narrator: just as in their first meeting, the press was summoned. >> everybody set up? all good? let me, first of all, welcome, once again,

prime minister netanyahu. >> narrator: but this time, bibi netanyahu would lecture barack obama on the peace process and hamas. >> israel obviously cannot be asked to negotiate with a government that is backed by the palestinian version of al qaeda. >> you're watching president obama there, with his face in his hand, and you can tell it's not going over well. this is his house, and to be lectured in his office, it rankles. >> israel cannot negotiate with a palestinian government that is backed by hamas. >> narrator: watching it unfold, chief of staff bill daley. >> bill daley is standing next to me and he's going, "outrageous. outrageous." and he's just, i mean, it's like he's almost levitating. >> because mr. president, history will not give the jewish people another chance. >> obama was treated to a lecture on jewish and israeli history that just went on and on, and deeply offended-- deeply offended-- obama and his people.

>> it's the ancient nation of israel. you know, we've been around for almost 4,000 years. we've experienced struggle and suffering like no other people. >> there was a sense of... gall. what gall. >> narrator: after the public dressing down, obama faced a choice about how to respond, how hard to push netanyahu. >> i think obama realized at that time that the price that he was paying for trying to ram something down netanyahu's throat that netanyahu didn't want to have rammed down his throat, was not worth, you know, it wasn't worth it for him. >> israel's prime minister, benjamin netanyahu, telling president obama... >> narrator: the palestinians, who had once cheered obama's election, now watched telwith disappointmenta... as the peace process not only faltered, but israel continued to build settlements. >> his approach has been to send signals, but to never follow up his signals with actual action. he didn't back up his statements against settlements

with actual actions and saying to the israelis, "you have to make a choice now. do you want these settlements or do you want the money that we give you every year?" it's always just been one signal after another signal after another signal. and this isn't an area that deals well with signals. this is an area that requires concrete action. >> he proved to the israeli public, "look, when i defend you, even against "the strongest person in the world, "the president of the united states, "we still get what we need in defense terms and we still get this huge check from the united states." he managed to prove that israel didn't pay a price. >> israel has many friends and allies, but when they're mistaken, it's my obligation to speak out clearly, and openly, and say so. >> netanyahu, as expected, continues to be the prime minister. we can expect a continued tense relationship with the obama administration.

>> narrator: netanyahu would capitalize on his defiance of obama as he ran for reelection in 2015. he publicly lashed out at the president over his deal with iran to curtail its nuclear program. >> the deal currently on the table is deeply flawed. instead of preventing iran from developing nuclear weapons, this impending deal will facilitate that development. >> narrator: he said it was a grave security risk to israel that would also fuel iran's backing of hamas. it played well to his base on the israeli right. he took an even harder line on the palestinian issue. >> (in hebrew):

>> he came out plain and simple and said there will not be a palestinian state. and that was the true face of netanyahu. >> israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu's likud party has won what's being called a stunning reelection victory. (netanyahu speaking hebrew) (cheers and applause) >> narrator: netanyahu's election victory emboldened his approach to the palestinians. he would take advantage of the fact they were divided between hamas in gaza, and the palestinian authority in the west bank. >> he wanted to divide, and he wanted to make sure that he doesn't have to negotiate any deal where you would connect between the territories and gaza. >> from an israeli standpoint, it makes sense. divide and rule. keep the west bank and gaza separate. that's the best way to prevent a pastinian state.

keep them both weak, but not weak enough where they collapse. >> narrator: netanyahu made a particularly fateful gamble when it came to hamas. with gaza under blockade, he allowed the wealthy gulf state qatar to give hamas hundreds of millions of dollars in assistance. >> he allowed qatar to pay hamas massive bags of cash in dollars, to buy quiet, to buy calmness from hamas. >> this money was spent on digging tunnels, anbuying rockets, and producing weapons now killing israelis. while netanyahu was telling us that he was our great protector, he was actually contributing not directly to building hamas and making it a regional power. >> israel has responded to a rocket attack from gaza with three punishing air strikes. >> israel's military said the strikes were a response to a rocket fired into southern israel. >> narrator: netanyahu has denied he was empowering hamas, and pointed to repeated military offensives in gaza

against the group-- a containment strategy known as "mowing the grass." >> this notion that every so often there would need to be predictable rounds of violence-- "mowing the grass," as israelis call it-- (chanting) ...only to result in reinstating the status quo that existed before the violence was an untenable situation. i, and others, had argued that eventually something's going to give. there's going to be an escalation that spirals out of control, the situation becomes so dire in humanitarian terms in gaza that there's a bigger explosion than anyone had anticipated. and that's precisely what happened. (loud explosions) (cheers and applause) >> thank you. >> narrator: with the palestinians divided, and netanyahu pursuing a strategy keeping it that way,

a new president with a new approach to the region came to power. >> thank you. i speak to you today as a lifelong supporter and true friend of israel. (cheers and applause) >> narrator: donald trump boasted he'd be the first u.s. president to broker an israeli-palestinian peace deal. >> donald trump neither knew nor cared about the history of the middle east or the failed efforts at middle east peace making. what he knew, or what he thought he knew, was that there was a big deal that was looming out there and that if you could make it, you'd get a nobel peace prize and the deal of the century. >> narrator: trump surrounded himself with a team that included his son-in-law jared kushner, who was a family friend of netanyahu, and david friedman, a controversial figure who supported israeli settlements. >> you had these advisors on israel, all of them jewish, all of them strong supporters of israel, none of them with any particular

background in negotiation in the region in terms of peace talks, but with very, very developed positions and points of view. >> he was anxious to see if there could be a peace deal reached between israel and the palestinians. i will tell you candidly, i, i was skeptical of that from the beginning. >> at the white house, netanyahu has been full of praise for the president. >> narrator: just one month into his term, trump invited netanyahu to the white house to discuss the possibilities. >> for netanyahu and his advisors, this was first and foremost, a moment of opportunity. trump seemed to them volatile, unpredictable, but perhaps unpredictable in ways that would benefit israel. >> bibi and i have known each other a long time. a smart man, great negotiator. and i think wee going to make a deal. >> narrator: trump gave netanyahu asaying he would be openr, to something other than a two-state solution. >> i'm looking at two-state and one state,

and i like the one that both parties like. i'm very happy with the one that both parties like. (netanyahu laughing) i could live with either one. >> it shocked a lot of people. i mean, trump was not of the conviction that there needed to be a two-state solution, hehought that there could be any number of ways where this, you know, conflict could be resolved. and a two-state solution was one of them. but he, he was certainly not pushing it. >> that is really a sea change in american policy, because basically going back for multiple presidents, the idea of an independent palestinian state as part of an ultimate solution or resolution of this conflict has always been the idea. and he's thrown all that out the window. >> we expect president trump any moment now. >> narrator: trump would soon follow that up with an even more surprising announcement; fulfilling a longtime wish of netanyahu's. >> today we finally acknowledge the obvious: that jerusalem is israel's capital. i am also directing the state department to begin preparations

to move the american embassy from tel aviv to jerusalem >> both israelis and palestinians claim jerusalem as their capital. if you put the american embassy there, you're seemingly putting your foot on the scale, saying, "we take israel's side in this." >> this is a historic moment. >> we told them from the day he started doing all that, from the first day, there will be no contact policy with you. you are completely and utterly boycotted. you shall not be a trusted mediator in this. you are disqualified. (loud blast) >> narrator: palestinians took to the streets to protest. >> the u.s. knows that jerusalem is the most sensitive issue. that was a move by the u.s., in a way, to tell israel that it has jerusalem. and deciding to have israel pocket this before starting negotiations, then you definitely do not want to have negotiations in the first place, you do not want to see a peace process ignited

in the first place, and you ain't interested in a two-state solution, altogether. >> please join me now in welcoming ambassador david friedman. >> narrator: in may of 2018, friedman, kushner, netanyahu, and nearly a thousand guests gathered in jerusalem for the official ceremony marking the move of the u. embassy. >> jerusalem is the heart and soul of the jewish people. even the most left wing jewish prayer books contain a prayer that god will restore the jewish people to jerusalem. so for the most important country in the world, the most powerful country in the world, to recognize jerusalem as the capital of israel, the fact that that hadn't been done for so long was just an open wound. it is now my great honor to call upon the prime minister of the state of israel, benjamin netanyahu. (cheers and applause) >> what a glorious day. remember this moment!

(cheers and applause) president trump, by recognizing history, you have made history. >> i was actually there. i was anchoring our broadcast from the embassy in jerusalem. and i remember i looked around at the crowd. it was just the crowd from one part of the political map. you didn't see there a lot of people from the opposition. you didn't see a lot of people from the peace camp or people who were used to working with the administration. it was a party of the right. >> we are in jerusalem and we are here to stay. and our brave soldiers, our brave soldiers are protecting the borders of israel as we speak today. we salute them all. >> narrator: that day around 50 miles south, at the border with gaza, tens of thousands of palestinians had gathered to protest the embassy move and israel's ongoing blockade.

(man speaking arabic) hamas urged protesters to break through the border fence. (gunshot, shouts) >> narrator: israeli soldiers responded with rifle fire... (gunshots) ...killing more than 60 people. >> what the embassy move symbolized to palestinians was that they were not going to have a state with its capital in jerusalem. because now the president of the united states had said that only israel had a legitimate claim to jerusalem and that it would remain eternally israel's capital. >> unfortunately, there was violent activity that day. and it ran its course. so we didn't focus on that-- we focused on our ceremony. >> ♪ peace will come upon us ♪ ♪ peace will come upon us, ace will come upon us ♪ >> narrator: for netanyahu, it was a high point in his relations with an american president. >> when president trump came in

and started to give all the gifts to netanyahu's administration and to the israeli public, it was like, you know, every day was boxing day. >> narrator: netanyahu's government began a rapid expansion of settlements in the west bank, the very move obama had personally warned against. >> because i can tell you that israel does want to make peace. >> narrator: the trump administration backed it, reversing the u.s.'s 40 year position that the settlements were illegal. >> the establishment of israeli civilian settlements in the west bank is not per se inconsistent with international law. >> these settlements are not the impediment to peace. and i believe as a matter of law, and as a matter of right, and i believe as a matter of the bible, which didn't drive my my views in office, but certainly drives them now that i'm not a public figure anymore, as a matter of biblical law, this land is, is biblical israel. that little piece of land was given,

by god, to the jewish people. >> seeing the u.s. performing, behaving, acting this way to the majority of the palestinian people was definitely a source of... ...hopelessness. and you know what? hopelessness is a very dangerous feeling. and when hopelessness accumulates over decades, it's not-- it's no longer just dangerous. it's catastrophic. >> the president of the united states, and the prime minister of the state of israel. >> narrator: adding insult to injury for the palestinians, trump and netanyahu convened at the white house to announce what would be called "the deal of the century." >> i was not elected to do small things or shy away from big problems. >> so there's this announcement in the white house, and trump comes out, and he's very proud. he says, "i've got this great deal,

it's going to solve the middle east peace problem here." no sign of the palestinians. they want nothing to do with this. >> that scene was the most vulgar expression of what the trump administration and the netanyahu government were all about. they were about liquidating the two-state solution, liquidating the palestinian issue and cause. >> under this vision, jerusalem will remain israel's undivided-- very important-- undivided capital. >> narrator: the deal offered netanyahu much of what he wanted. >> but that's no big deal, because i've already done that for you, right? (laughter) we've already done that, but that's okay. it's going to remain that way. >> the deal of the century was a fantastic blueprint from the perspective of the netanyahu point of view. no settlements to be removed, a rump palestinian entity that they might call a state, but was not really a state. would have no control of its borders, no control even of its own water, no control of its rspace.

it would not be able to function as a state. it would be a collection of municipalities. >> it is only reasonable that i have to do a lot for the palestinians or it just wouldn't be fair. now don't clap for that, okay, but it's true. it wouldn't be fair. >> narrator: to try to lure the palestinians into the deal, trump promised international investment worth $50 billion. >> an american president stands next to an israeli prime minister and tells them, "we will buy you off with some money." that scene has hit the heart of every palestinian, the heart of palestinians who have been struggling for a hundred years. >> narrator: then netanyahu took the podium and went even farther than the terms of the deal. >> i hope that the palestinians embrace this. >> narrator: he announced israel was about to annex almost a third of the west bank. >> netanyahu announces that he's going to proceed

with annexation of the west bank. it's a unilateral claim on territory. and it really throws a lot of sand in the gears of what's going on here, because if you start unilaterally claiming sovereignty over sections of the west bank without having made any concessions, what is the incentive for the palestinians to come to the table? >> and may god bless us all with security, prosperity, and peace. thank you. (cheers and applause) (man speaking arabic over loudspeaker) >> narrator: the palestinians were now effectively sidelined. but unexpectedly, it set the stage for a major shift in the middle east. in the summer of 2020, yousef al aiba, a friend of jared kushner's and the united arab emirates ambassador to the u.s., saw an opportunity to propose a different kind of peace deal to netanyahu.

not between israel and the palestinians, but between israel and some of its arab neighbors. >> by this time, many of the arab governments are eager to have relations with israel. and the palestinian issue is a nuisance on the way. and for some of them, they felt that they were always putting their interests second to the palestinian cause. and when israel speaks of annexing parts of the west bank, the emiratis, in particular, the united arab emirates, see an opportunity to prevent that annexation in exchange for a peace deal. >> narrator: al otaiba said that the u.a.e. and other arab nations would consider normalizing relations with israel if netanyahu stopped his planned annexations. >> the fact that the u.a.e. would even consider signing a normalization deal with israel without consulti palestinians, was pretty remarkable. it's really a sign of just how much the region has changed in the past decade.

and how much lower the palestinian issue was now on the, on even the priorities of arab states. >> narrator: at the white house, trump's team jumped on the idea, which played into a long-held goal of netanyahu's. >> this was netanyahu's theory of the case, that the world was moving on from the palestinians. that in fact israel could achieve meaningful and lasting stability without having to trade away land for peace to the palestinians, which had always been the premise of the two-state solution. ("hail to the chief" playing) >> narrator: after talks facilitated by trump's team, israel and two arab countries, the u.a.e. and bahrain, announced they would normalize relations. netanyahu dropped his annexation plans. it was the first peace treaty between israel and any arab country in almost 30 years. >> we're here this afternoon to change the course of history.

>> ultimately, the deal that trump announces, with great fanfare at the white house, is not a deal between israel and the palestinians. it's not the mideast peace you were looking for. (chuckles) it's a totally different issue. it's a step forward, it's a significant step forward. >> this day is a pivot of history. >> they're doing all this without any real movement on the palestinian issue. for netanyahu, this was the crown jewel of his legacy to a certain degree. (applause) >> it's a wake-up call for the palestinians to say, "guys, "you know what, everybody's got their own issues. not everybody is laying up at night worrying about yours." (crowd chanting) >> the abraham accords were definitely seen as a betrayal by palestinians. and palestinians, in general, felt that the arab states had, had abandoned them. and palestinians, in general, fel(chanting continues)es >> narrator: the palestinian authority had called the accords "despicable." >> palestinians did not take advantage of the opportunity

the abraham accords made. if the p.a. had gone to the, to the emirates and said, "okay, you're going to do this, it's, okay, "we appreciate no annexation, but here are some other things that you should be asking for..." and the emiratis would have done it. but they were so quick to sort of condemn them-- "you betrayed us." there's a constant theme of betrayal in the palestinian narrative, and there isn't a constant theme of responsibility on the palestinian side. >> iran sees the abraham accord as a threat. >> narrator: the abraham accords would incite israel's enemies and seed conflict to come. >> what you see, if you're hamas, is the world is moving beyond you. they no longer care, it seems like, about the plight of the palestinians in gaza. and this is a deal that is, essentially, marginalizing hamas, marginalizing the palestinians, marginalizing their grievance. and they're left to wonder, "well, what becomes of us?

"you know, what do we do to get some attention to our cause again?" (man speaking indistinctly over loud speaker) >> you cannot ignore the palestinian people. no matter how much you try, by the power of the missiles and the tanks, as we have seen throughout the years and now, or by the power of the complete capitulation of a u.s. administration like trump, or by the power of getting some arab countries to normalize without a real solution. all that, all that does not work and shall never, ever work. (people shouting, screaming) >> narrator: may, 2021. in jerusalem, violent protests erupted over the potential evictions of palestinians from their homes. (banging, explosions crackling) the conflict escalated when israeli police raided the al aqsa mosque, one of islam's holiest sites.

(rocket launching) from gaza, hamas retaliated... (second rocket launches) ...firing rockets toward jerusalem. (siren wailing, man whistles, shouting) (explosions) and in response, netanyahu launched multiple airstrikes. (explosions) ♪ ♪ it was just four months into president joe biden's term, and the israeli-palestinian conflict was suddenly front and center. (man wailing) >> early in biden's tenure, he has sort of a test case of what's going to happen in israel and gaza region. (man sobbing) and the question for biden as the american president is, "okay, what are you going to do about it?" >> narrator: he'd known netanyahu for more than 40 years. and as israeli forces pummeled gaza, he picked up the phone.

>> he basically is not willing to restrain netanyahu at first. he says, "we're with israel. they have a right to defend themselves." >> he thought "we don't criticize israel "on the world stage, because they get enough of that. "but we hold them close, and that way, "when we pick up the phone, and we say, "'time's up, your military operation has run its course,' that they'll listen." "'time's up, your military operation has run its course,' (loud explosion) >> narrator: as the violence intensified... (loud explosion) ...biden pushed netanyahu for a ceasefire. >> it ended in a sort of a miserable draw. a ceasefire was reached. >> (translated): if hamas thinks we will tolerate a drip of rockets, it is wrong. >> as usual, the israeli leadership were saying, "we've won this round again, and hamas is weakened and deterred. "we're stronger. we proved our military might; hamas is deterred." (siren blaring)

>> narrator: but for hamas, the conflict was a breakthrough. they used it to tout themselves as fighting not just for palestinians in gaza, but in jerusalem as well. >> they bombed jerusalem. they bombed tel aviv. they saw theelves as regional leaders, not as a local organization that is fighting israel over the border between gaza and israel. >> so hamas now is not just protecting its fiefdom in the gaza strip, but now vying for leadership of the palestinian struggle as a whole by being the only party that is responding to events in jerusalem. (man chanting in arabic over loud speaker) (crowdepeats chant) in contrast to the impotence and ineffectiveness of the palestinian leadership in ramallah. >> narrator: in the wake of the conflict, a photo of yahya sinwar, hamas's leader in gaza, sent a foreboding message.

>> what sinwar did, which was quite interesting, is take a picture of him sitting on an armchair. the destruction around him was quite clear. this was saying, "okay, you're maybe stronger right now, "but i haven't lost anything. i'm willing to go for another round whenever i choose." at the same time, hamas was also beginning to prepare its plan of attack, something that it implemented so horrifically on october 7, 2023. >> soldiers (singing in arabic): >> narrator: netanyahu's go-to strategy toward hamas-- containment in gaza-- was beginning to crack. but his focus was elsewhere. >> netanyahu is currently on trial for corruption. >> over allegedly accepting bribes in a breach of trust. >> narrator: he was embroiled in scandal, facing charges of bribery and corruption. he and his coalition government were briefly toppled.

>> his own personal affairs lead eventually to three different indictments on criminal charges, including bribery, charges that he has always claimed are bogus, and are an attempt to persecute him. >> narrator: to regain power, netanyahu courted israel's most extreme parties. >> and so for netanyahu, he felt, "i have no chance but to go to the right, even the very far right," even parties on the extreme far right that his own likud party had always shunned. >> some members of likud warned him that this will be very dangerous, that the whole government will take a very dangerous ideological direction. >> prime minister benjamin netanyahu has inaugurated the most far right government in the country's history. >> narrator: recently re-elected and now the head of a new, far right government... >> controversial plans to overhaul the justice system. >> narrator: ...netanyahu started pursuing a dramatic overhaul of israel's judicial system

that would weaken the courts' power over the executive branch. >> it was a sudden outpouring of rage. >> narrator: protests erupted across israel. >> bibi is not here for the democracy. thank you very much. >> we see hundreds of thousands of israelis in the streets, which is pretty amazing for a country of just ten million people. and th are there week after week after week protesting netanyahu's efforts, which they see as a threat to democracy. they see it as a power grab by the prime minister. >> he's facing trial for three different counts of corruption, and for him, it was a life or death moment. he needed to change israel's legal system so he could somehow stop the trial. >> that led to, i would say, the biggest wave of protests in the history of the country. and probably the most severe political crisis and social crisis

in the history of the country. looking at this now, after october 7, that seems like a sweet dream for israelis. but back then, it was the country being on the brink of civil war. >> narrator: inside netanyahu's government, intelligence officials worried that the political unrest was leaving the country vulnerable to its enemies. >> in many meetings, the chiefs of israeli intelligence warn netanyahu that the political crisis, and its effect on the military, are perceived by israeli enemy as the time to take more aggressive initiative against israel. >> there were actually quite a lot of warnings saying, "look, we're creating here the perfect storm. "and at one point or another, one of our enemies "would use that to start a war, "because they would feel that we're weak, and that we're consumed with our own domestic political problems."

>> those protesting say that this is escalating into an existential battle... >> narrator: in washington, president biden watched the situation with alarm and urged netanyahu to reverse course. >> they cannot continue down this road. and i've sort of made that clear. i... hopeful, hopefully, the prime minister will act in a way that he can try to work out some genuine compromise. but that remains to be seen. >> the president's meeting with crown prince mohammed bin salman. >> narrator: for biden, the unrest in israel threatened to disrupt a plan he'd been nurturing to take the abraham accords to the next level in the middle east. he and netanyahu had been quietly courting saudi arabia. >> they did push, and try to expand on the abraham accords, in particular with a vision of israeli-saudi normalization that would offer a dramatically different vision of the middle east, and one that would fit in well to their vision

of creating alliances, in particular in competition with china and russia. >> narrator: by late september 2023, a deal was taking shape. >> prime minister of the state of israel, i invite him to address the assembly. (applause) >> narrator: less than three weeks before the october 7 attacks, netanyahu would make a fateful speech. >> he said, "we are going to have peace with saudi arabia, and the palestinians should not have a veto on that." >> i've long sought to make peace with the palestinians. but i also believe that we must not give the palestinians a veto over new peace treaties with arab states. >> which is, in a different language, from my point of view, "the palestinians can (bleep) off." sorry, excuse my french. >> now, for years, my approach to peace was rejected by the so-called experts. well, they were wrong. peace between israel and saudi arabia

will truly create a new middle east. >> the leaders of hamas, as they explain to us, they see this and they understand that, in a moment, the palestinian issue will be completely taken off the world agenda. (explosion booming) now, they came to the conclusion-- a jihadist conclusion-- of blood, of murder, of massacre. (gunfire) they wanted regional war. >> there's an israel before october 7... and there is an israel after october 7. (no audio) (muffled weapons firing, people panicking) the barbarity. (weapon firing) the hate, the raping, the burning, the killing of children,

the ruthlessness. those atrocities are second only to what the jews met in the holocaust. (muffled shouting) after october 7, every single israeli i know is asking themselves one question. "is this a place where i can have a tomorrow?" is this a place where i can live?" >> israel is at war. we didn't want this war. it was forced upon us in the most brutal and savage way. >> narrator: hamas had carried out the deadliest sile assault in israel's history, and it had happened on benjamin netanyahu's watch. >> he saw himself as the greatest protector of the state of israel and persuaded himself and his supporters that israel was safe and that he could handle everything. >> hamas will understand that by attacking us,

they have made a mistake of historic proportions. >> he would manage the palestinian conflict without attempting to solve it. he would keep hamas as an enemy entity, but a weak one. >> the problem, of course, is that he refused to accept the fact that actually some of his actions were pushing hamas in the worst direction possible. >> israel will win this war, and when israel wins, the entire civilized world wins. >> narrator: in washington, president biden was visibly shaken by the killing and taking of hostages. >> this is an act of sheer evil. more than 1,000 civilians slaughtered-- not just killed, slaughtered-- in israel. >> i was just a few feet away from h. you could just see in his face and see in his mannerisms that he really was viscerally outraged. >> hamas offers nothing but terror and bloodshed

with no regard to who pays the price. >> i don't think i've ever seen a president quite as angry in a speech as biden was that day. >> let there be no doubt. the united states has israel's back. we'll make sure the jewish and democratic state of israel n defend itself today, tomorrow, as we always have. it's as simple as that. these atrocities. it's sickening. we're with israel, let's make no mistake. thank you. (reporters clamoring) >> mr. president, what was your reaction... >> narrator: but despite his full throated public support... (explosions booming) ...as israel began airstrikes in gaza, behind the scenes, biden was concerned. >> their position was no humanitarian assistance should go into gaza until the hostages come home. that was the unanimous view, and the president wanted to go face-to-face and say,

"we, we cannot accept that. we cannot accept that policy." >> ...air force one... >> narrator: within days, the president arrived in tel aviv. >> president biden really wanted to make a statement with this trip. it was really a very dramatic moment. >> he is now descending the stairs of air force one, making this historic visit to israel... >> narrator: the famous bear hug, with its dual message of solidarity and caution. >> he doesn't want to look like that he is telling the israelis how to respond, but he's just giving them the caution of a friend, is the way he would put it. "we're with you here, but, but be careful. there are limits to how far you should go." >> the bear hug approach-- hug israel publicly, show no daylight with israel-- while privately delivering messas to show restraint and to be more cautious

and so forth, that approach doesn't work. it's never worked. (booming) there needed to be a more stern message about the need to operate within the constraints of international law. (distant echoing) we are seeing unprecedented levels of civilian casualties. (distorted wailing) no one knows what it means to destroy hamas, other than you just keep killing, and killing, and killing. and for what? what is the upper ceiling? is it 20,000 killed? is it 100,000? (indistinct panicking) what is the upper limit?

>> (speaking arabic) >> narrator: the bloodshed has played into hamas' hands. >> they blessed, they prayed, they wanted this to happen. so israel will react with force. the whole region is destabilized. and according to them, the palestinians are not forgotten. they were willing to sacrifice gaza and all the gazans in exchange of their jihad. (crowd shouting) >> very intense few days of protest around the world... >> narrator: for months, the humanitarian crisis from israel's military response has brought widespread condemnation. >> israel is a terrorist state! >> israel is a terrorist state! >> narrator: but with hamas stilholding hostages, netanyahu has been pushing forward. >> (speaking hebrew):

>> the mounting isolation of the united states... >> narrator: in the u.s., there has been increasing pressure on president biden to do more to restrain israel's response. >> we all want this war to end yesterday. if someone says "do you want the war to continue or stop?" the answer is, of course, stop. but recognizing that, if hamas is fully intact, it simply creates the conditions for the next conflict. this is an incredibly difficult dilemma. it's something we are confronting really even at this hour. >> narrator: in the face of the criticism, the president has tried to turn attention to the day after. >> we're working very hard to bring it to a point of conclusion... to which something better and more durable can be established, including, ultimately, a palestinian state, and we've said that very clearly. >> i think the only ultimate answer here is a two-state solution that's real.

>> i've been really struck by the extent to which joe biden and some of those around him have immediately revived the language of the two-state solution. >> what biden seemed to want is to use this tragic moment for something bigger, for two-state solution, for negotiation. and this is where he and netanyahu are, like, in total different worlds. >> narrator: now, the two men who'd embraced on the tarmac are at a critical juncture as the consequences of the war accumulate. >> the calls for accountabilit are now growing. >> israeli forces admit they killed seven aid workers delivering footo starving palestinians. >> narrator: president biden recently took the extreme step of pausing a shipment of bombs to israel. >> we're not walking away from israel's security. we're walking away from israel's ability to wage war in those areas.

>> biden warned israel against authorizing a military operation in the southern gaza city of rafa. >> narrator: netanyahu has not backed down. >> (speaking hebrew): >> narrator: but he is increasingly under pressure. >> breaking this morning, the international criminal court has announced it is seeking arrest warrants for israeli and hamas leaders including prime minister benjamin netanyahu. >> they're all charged for war crimes or crimes against humanity. >> it's alleged these crimes were committed in the context of the ongoing armed conflict. >> narrator: and he's facing challenges at home. >> we have a leader who is mistrusted by most of the israeli voters. and yet he's leading us through our worst crisis since this country was established 75 years ago. and this is part of the tragedy. we may be facing not only our worst security situation,

but also a huge political crisis with no kind of solution on the horizon. >> there is not going back. everyone agrees. israelis, americans, palestinians, gaza, west bank, anywhere you ask, everyone agrees there's no going back to the october 6th status quo. the question is, where do we go from here? is it a pathway to something less awful? or is it more destruction and death and something considerably worse than what we've had before? those are still open questions. >> go to pbs.org/frontline for more of our coverage of the ongoing conflict. including extended interviews. >> is this a place where i can have a tomorrow? >> you cannot ignore the palestinian people. >> if someone says, “do you want the war to continue or stop?” the answer is of course stop.

>> connect with frontline on facebook, instagram and x, formerly twitter, and stream anytime on the pbs app, youtube, or pbs.org/frontline. >> ...grapple with the impact of the ongoing pandemic... >> narrator: the truth is rarely black and white. >> ...protesters versus frontline workers... >> ...filled with so much uncertainty... >> narrator: but if we ask the hard questions... >> one million americans lost to... >> narrator: check the facts... >> the intert is disrupting... >> “...is amazon taking over the world a good thing?” >> narrator: dig a little deeper... >> boom! >> narrator: and take a breath... the truth is closer than you think. >> frontline is made possible by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. and by the corporation for public broadcasting. additional support is provided by the abrams foundation, committed to excellence in journalism... park foundation, dedicated to heightening public

awareness of critical issues... the john d. and catherine t. macarthur foundation committed to building a more just, verdant and peaceful world. more at macfound.org. the heising-simons foundation, unlocking knowledge, opportunity and possibilities. at hsfoundation.org. and by the frontline journalism fund, with major support from jon and jo ann hagler, and additional support from koo and patricia yuen, committed to bridging cultural differences in our communities. captioned by media access group at wgbh access.wgbh.org >> for more on this and other "frontline" programs, visit our website at pbs.org/frontline. ♪ ♪

frontline's "netanyahu, america and the road to war in gaza" is available on amazon prime video. ♪ ♪ ♪♪ you're watching pbs. ♪♪ ♪♪

♪♪

>>barrington: we're taking a road >>katera: three educators from three different walks of life. >>robin: we are interviewing folks in education, trying to discover the meaning of expanding students success. >>katerra: going on this journey has invigorated me. >>barrington: it's amazing how many people have seen my potential throughout this trip. >>robin: i need to be in a headspace that i believe that change is possible and i heard that >>speaker: you are more powerful than you realize. and they need somebody brave. >>narrator: road trip nation is made possible by the chan zuckerberg initiative, which aims to solve society's toughest challenges