Skip to main content

tv   Dateline  MSNBC  December 3, 2023 2:00am-3:01am PST

2:00 am
and they're proud to have helped pass skylar's law, which requires amber alerts, even when police suspect a teen has run away. a national version of skylar's law is currently making its way through congress. it's peaceful here now. they come here often, even in the winter, to tend the small garden they've built for skylar. mary, how do you want skylar to be remembered? >> the happy, loving little girl that she was. >> and the smile. that smile could light up a room. >> that's all for this edition of "dateline." >> i'm andrea canning. >> and this is "dateline. " >> we were going to go wherever the case was.
2:01 am
>> one of the most extraordinary cases in lapd history. >> toto, were not in kansas anymore. >> a newlywed murdered months after her wedding. >> as she walked away, she gave me a big smile and and i lived in that smile for years. >> and all the time episode the killer was hiding in plain sight. >> no indication she was ever spoken to? >> no. >> then a new detective took a look at an old lead. >> he just said it's a match. >> a person no one would have ever suspected of murder. >> we were going to end this. >> was suddenly suspect number one. >> perfect murder. almost. ♪ ♪ ♪ >> hello. welcome to "dateline". she was a new bride married just three months, then she was
2:02 am
found murdered. what happened to her remained a mystery for decades partly because police told us the thief must have killed her during a break-in gone bad. they discovered it wasn't a murder, but a suspect whose trail right to their own front door. here is josh mankiewicz with " the smoking gun. " >> february 1st, 2009. the detective arrived before dawn at the los angeles police department's van nuys station. >> i was tired. i was tired. >> he had hosted a super bowl party the night before and the beer had flowed freely. >> that seemed to be a good day to have a cup of coffee and caught up on my reading. >> a couple of aspirin? >> maybe. >> he reached for a file sitting on his desk for months. the file of sherri rasmussen. shot to death in her condo a few miles from where he worked.
2:03 am
>> it was one of the most horrific crime scenes. i said this guy met a horrible ending. >> just as troubling, sherri rasmussen was murdered a generation ago. february, 1986. meaning the odds of catching her killer were slim to none. >> memories fade. evidence has to be relocated. so it's obviously an uphill battle. >> uphill battle does not begin to describe it. the cold case the detective opened on that bleary-eyed monday morning would lead him on a chase of a lifetime and shake the foundations of the lapd. dates back to 1986 and a battle for the truth by the parents of a young bride. >> we miss her every day.
2:04 am
>> those parents are nels and loretta rasmussen. >> doesn't make any difference what day it is. it's a pain that is always there. there's no cure for it. >> who would want to kill sherri rasmussen? she was hard-working, caring, and popular with her coworkers. trained as a nurse, sherri was director of critical care at a large local hospital. >> we are implementing the people difference program. >> it was a devastating day. she was 29 years old and just in the prime of her career. >> althea kennedy was sherri's boss at the hospital and had originally hired her. >> we couldn't believe it. first of all, like how could someone do this? people crying. people upset. i mean, the hospital was like a tomb, you know? so, the loss was real palpable. >> sherri had just married
2:05 am
three months earlier to john ruetten. >> where the happily married? >> unusually so. >> months after the wedding, john found sherri sprawled dead. he might seem a likely suspect, but john was cleared almost immediately. the lapd focused instead on evidence that this was a burglary that turned violent. >> this was no accident. >> yolanda mcclary was a retired crime scene investor investigator and was a consultant to "dateline. " >> multiple shots fired. shots fired at very close range. >> she has reviewed court records and media reports on this case. we returned with her to the actual apartment where sherri was found murdered to try to understand what happened. police think maybe the killer just walked in the open front door? >> they didn't find any forced
2:06 am
entry, so, yes, they are assumg the front door was open and the killer just walked right in. >> right here where we are standing, is there some kind of confrontation? >> yes. this appears to be a struggle here. not just a struggle, but we also have shots fired at this point. we have one shot that clearly goes straight through this back slider and another shot that went through sherri and then back out through the slider also. >> so, sherri is now wounded and she tries to get back downstairs? >> that would be correct. she is bleeding profusely and very wounded and she gets down these steps and actually it would appear she is trying to go out the door, or make it to that alarm box where there is a panic button. at that point, we believe that sherri went down in this foyer area, due to the fact that you could see marks in this, as well as broken fingernails from her hands. >> so, there is a tremendous fight going on? >> well, yes. the killer is actually dragging her back into this area and then the killer takes a vase
2:07 am
and hits her in the head with it, knocking her out. then grabs the blanket, muzzles the gun, and does and does a close contact shot into the victim. >> so, that is an execution? >> that would be correct. >> as for a motive? it seemed to be in plain sight. just a few feet from sherri's body >> they found vcr and a disc player that was stacked one on top of the other in the front door. >> as if somebody was about to steal them? >> yeah, giving the indication this was a burglary or a home invasion gone wrong. >> sherri's purse was missing, as was her new bmw, an engagement gift from john. there was no sign of the murder weapon, but detectives did recover two. 38 caliber slugs and something else that caught the detective's attention. >> on the inside of sherri's left arm, they found a bite mark. a crime scene analyst went ahead and she swabbed that for saliva that could pertain to the killer. >> saliva that contained dna from whoever bit sherri.
2:08 am
remember, this was 1986, years before dna technology testing would arrive, which could link a suspect to a sample like this one. so, back then, the dna wasn't much help. but the swab was carefully package and bundled with all of the other evidence. for now, detectives didn't have much else to work with. no eyewitnesses. no usable fingerprints. no clear motive, except for theory that this was a botched burglary. >> by the level of violence that occurred in this residence, the theory was that it was a man or possibly two men that had entered the residence to do a burglary or a home invasion that had not gone completely wrong, murders the victimet to cover up the crime and then fled. >> gone wrong because sherri somehow surprised them. they panicked, shot her, and then fled.
2:09 am
the theory seemed to make sense, especially since sherri had no apparent enemies, certainly no one who want to kill her, or so they thought. >> coming up. >> we went to sherri's office and said if she couldn't have john, nobody could. >> when "dateline" continues. for the chance at clear or almost clear skin. it's like the feeling of finding your back... is back. or finding psoriasis can't deny the splendor of these thighs. once-daily sotyktu is proven to get more people clearer skin than the leading pill. don't take if you're allergic to sotyktu; serious reactions can occur. sotyktu can lower your ability to fight infections including tb. serious infections, cancers including lymphoma, muscle problems, and changes in certain labs have occurred. tell your doctor if you have an infection, liver or kidney problems, high triglycerides, or had a vaccine or plan to. sotyktu is a tyk2 inhibitor. tyk2 is part of the jak family.
2:10 am
it's not known if sotyktu has the same risks as jak inhibitors. find what plaque psoriasis has been hiding. ask your dermatologist about sotyktu for clearer skin. so clearly you. sotyktu. after advil: let's dive in! but...what about your back? it's fineeeeeeee! [splash] before advil: advil dual action fights pain two ways. advil targets pain at the source, acetaminophen blocks pain signals. advil dual action. can we get real clear about life with psoriasis? yeah, i'm ready. is your treatment leaving you with uncontrolled symptoms? like the cover-it-ups and brush-it-offs? enough with good enoughs. don't stay hiding or hurting. ♪ when your lotions and creams don't do enough to help treat the inflammation beneath the skin, causing plaques and pain, it's time to get real about psoriasis, so, your dermatologist can help you get clear. make the appointment and ask about real clear skin. travel. there is nothing like it
2:11 am
dancing is my passion. but with my moderate-to-severe eczema, it hasn't always been easy. i was constantly itching. whatever i was doing now, i'm staying ahead of my eczema there's a power inside all of us to live our passion. and dupixent works on the inside, to help heal your skin from within. it helps block a key source of inflammation inside the body that can cause eczema. so, adults can have long lasting, clearer skin and fast itch relief serious allergic reactions can occur, that can be severe. tell your doctor about new or worsening eye problems, such as eye pain or vision changes, including blurred vision, joint aches and pains, or a parasitic infection. don't change or stop asthma medicines without talking to your doctor. healing from within is a powerful thing. ask your eczema specialist how dupixent can help heal your skin from within. new emergen-c crystals pop and fizz when you throw them back.
2:12 am
and who doesn't love a good throwback? [sfx: video game] emergen-c crystals. >> the year was 1986.
2:13 am
crack was hitting los angeles, and the city of angels had become a violent place. the murder rate would hit 831 killings that year. nearly three times the amount 30 years later in 2016, and the lapd was stretched very thin. >> this was a time where homicide was just booming in los angeles. >> miles corwin is a best selling author who has written several books about the lapd. >> it's kind of a perfect storm of problems. you had the proliferation of high-powered weapons and crack cocaine hitting the streets, a tremendous homicide rate and detectives are overwhelmed. >> in february of that year, cops had their hands full with an especially heinous crime in the san fernando valley that was sprawling. 29-year-old sherri rasmussen had been brutally beaten and shot in her own home. no suspects and few clues. then a couple of weeks later, a possible lead. former criminal variation yolanda
2:14 am
mcclary was a consultant for nbc news. >> in the same vicinity, another woman was approached in her residence by two males at gun point, also involved a home invasion robbery situation, so police, early on, thought there was a possibility these two men might have something to do with the murder. >> a composite sketch was released of the 2 men. the dna collected at the crime scene was useless, at least right now. police collected it any way. why? >> at crime scenes, if you know there's possible evidence on anything, you're not going to leave it behind. so, it was great forethought on their behalf actually to recover it. >> detectives scoured the condo and the entire complex. the only thing apparently stolen was from the garage, sherri's car. and that was recovered just a mile away from the crime
2:15 am
scene with the keys still in it. the only other thing missing, sherri and her husband's marriage license. it seemed an odd thing to steal. cash, computers, and jewelry were not touched. but that wasn't the only thing that struck sherri's family and colleagues as strange. the crime was especially violent for a two-bit burglary. >> it just seemed a little like overkill. >> sherri's boss at the hospital, althea kennedy, had to review sherri's autopsy report for insurance reasons and she was struck by what she saw. >> i thought, wow, she really put up one heck of a fight. which wasn't real surprising, because sherri was tall, athletic, and i'm sure wouldn't go down easily. >> the lapd theory back then
2:16 am
was that there were two men robbing the house and so, presumably, sherri would have fought with two guys. does that sound like sherri? >> that part didn't make sense to me because two men and two guns seemed weird. >> because sherri wouldn't begin a fight with two guys who were armed? >> i wouldn't think so. >> what about with a woman? >> i think she would have taken on a woman. >> we would really like to know what happened. >> sherri's parents knew it it was a burglary. weeks before the burglary, sherri had several strange encounters. one as she dined at a restaurant and thought a woman was watching her. >> she said she has eyes that can see right through you. >> scary eyes. >> there was also a run-in at the hospital where sherri worked. >> she went to sherri's office and said that if she couldn't have john, nobody could.
2:17 am
>> most terrifying, an encounter in sherri's own home. and by now, she knew who the mystery woman was. >> she heard a noise and she looked up and there was john's ex-girlfriend. >> how did she get in the house? >> we have no idea. >> john's ex-girlfriend appeared to be stalking sherri. yet sherri never mentioned the woman's name to her parents. instead, she told them not to worry. >> she told me, i want to see if i can't work this out myself. >> that conversation happened during a dinner celebrating sherri's 29th birthday. afterward, her parents should sherri to the airport. >> as she walked away, she turned and gave me a big smile, and i've relived that smile for years. >> less than three weeks later, sherri rasmussen lay dead. the rasmussens insist that early in the investigation, they told the lead lapd detective about
2:18 am
sherri's troubling encounters with john's ex-girlfriend. >> i told the detective not once, but probably 15 to 20 times. and he said, the trouble with you is you've been watching too much tv. >> coming up -- old evidence offers new clues. >> the suspect made it appear to look like a burglary. they staged it to mislead the initial investigation in 1986. she was executed. >> when "dateline" continues. (carolers) ♪ it's all good - just a little awkward. ♪ (soloist) think we'll wrap this up. (vo) for a limited time, turn any iphone in any condition into a new iphone 15 pro with titanium and ipad and apple watch se - all on us.
2:19 am
that's up to $1700 in value. only on verizon. >> years had passed and no
2:20 am
2:21 am
2:22 am
arrests had been made in the brutal 1986 slaying of nurse and newlywed sherri rasmussen. killed in her los angeles condo. the trail kept getting colder. in 1993, sherri's parents offered to have the saliva sample the bite mark for dna, and even pay for it, but the lapd declined. >> she said we don't have a suspect. if we had a suspect we would have something to match. >> the case sat for another decade. but then in 2004, the lapd was conducting cases on cold cases and one of them was the murder of sherri rasmussen. it took two months to find that saliva sample -- buried in a refrigeration unit. the envelope was tattered, label torn, but the saliva was still inside and the dna was just enough to blow this case wide
2:23 am
open. >> in that lab report, it indicated that the suspect that had bitten sherri rasmussen during the struggle was a female. >> a woman. not two male burglars, as the original detectives had suspected all those years. but it would take a few more years before investigators began to understand what that crucial dna test result meant. it was now 2009, and the case was cold once again. 23 years it sat with no apparent leads, no suspects, and no answers for the rasmussen family. then came that monday after the super bowl when detective jim nuttall started peeking through that old case file and made a remarkable discovery. the dna test that had been conducted on that bite mark back in 2004.
2:24 am
once the department realized a woman was involved, why did it take four years until you finally picked it up? what was the department doing in the interim? >> from what it appears, investigators may have followed the initial theory of this crime, that, in fact, it was a burglary. >> and that there was a woman involved in the burglary? >> that there was a woman
2:25 am
involved in the burglary. looking back now in hindsight, it was an opportunity that may have slipped through our hands as an organization. >> but now nuttall took a closer look at the crime scene photos and began to develop his own very different theory. remember, sherri rasmussen was shot at point blank range after a violent struggle, and despite the stereo equipment stacked by the front door, very little was actually stolen. >> the suspect made it appear to look like a burglary. they staged it to mislead the investigation in 1986. she was executed. >> in other words, someone had wanted sherri rasmussen dead. so now, nuttall dug deeper through the file looking for names, female names. >> we had five women that would have had access to sherri and perhaps at least some of them may have had a motive to harm her. three of them we eliminated almost immediately for insufficient motive. >> but there were still two names left. one of them was a coworker. >> a woman named debra that worked with sherri rasmussen in the glendale hospital. this person of interest was later placed by sherri rasmussen in an official capacity and problems followed almost immediately after that. >> so, there was bad blood between them?
2:26 am
>> there was a motive. >> debra had moved to northern california. nuttall asked local law enforcement to watch her and secretly try to snag a sample of her dna for comparison testing. in the meantime, nuttall learned more about the second woman. he contacted john ruetten, sherri's former husband and now remarried and living in san diego. >> john involved he had been involved in a dating relationship with stephanie lazarus. >> stephanie lazarus -- that was the other name on the short list of suspects. nuttall pressed ruetten for more on their relationship which had started when they were both students at u.c.l.a.. they dated on and off until john got engaged to sherri. but even then... >> even though you're convinced the relationship that john had with stephanie lazarus overlapped with the relationship he had with his wife? >> we know from john that there was at least on one occasion where he was engaged that he was intimate with stephanie lazarus. there was a love
2:27 am
triangle and stephanie lazarus had deep feelings for john ruetten, and may have had a motive to harm sherri rasmussen. >> was sherri's killer a scorned lover or a jealous coworker? >> we had two women on the list who, in our opinion, had a motive to harm her. >> debra, the nurse, and stephanie lazarus? >> correct. >> a few weeks later, cops in northern california tracked down debra and secretly scooped up a sample of her trash which contained dna. it was sent to the crime lab in l.a. for analysis and 72 hours later, came an answer. >> she was not the donor of the dna profile from the bite. >> that left just one possible suspect, number five on the list, john ruetten's ex-girlfriend, stephanie lazarus. nuttall called the rasmussens.
2:28 am
>> we came home and there was a message on our phone from a detective that they wanted to talk to us. i thought oh, yeah, right. i thought it was just another false hope. >> this is detective nuttall? >> right. >> he said that they were opening the investigation. >> nels was upset with me. it was like, detective, where have you been for the last two decades. >> now nels rasmussen explained it all. how he told detectives back in 1986 that someone was stalking his daughter, sherri. a woman with crazy eyes. the ex-girlfriend of sherri's husband. nels had never known that the girlfriend's name was stephanie lazarus. but he did know something else about her. something very important and by this time, detective nuttall knew it too. >> he was very cautious of what he said. but he said that we would be hearing more from him. >> nuttall had ample reason to
2:29 am
be cautious. because he learned that stephanie lazarus wore the same badge he did. >> we now have a los angeles police officer as a person of interest in a murder case. >> and you thought, i've bitten off more than i can chew? >> toto, we are not in kansas any more. that changed everything. >> coming up -- a top secret investigation, as detectives go after one of their own. >> we would never leave a paper trail of what we were doing. she worked our unit. >> when "dateline" continues.
2:30 am
2:31 am
2:32 am
>> reporter: i'm katie phang with our top stories. in paris, police arrested a man suspected of a deadly night of attack and it goes to the eiffel tower. is saint-germain tourist who later died. two others who were reportedly injured. authorities say the attacker was motivated by the killing of muslims in the middle east. back here at home, a federal inmate accused of stabbing fellow inmate in minneapolis derek chauvin 22 times is being charged with attempted murder.
2:33 am
authorities say he was allegedly thinking about and plan in the attack for a month. now back to dateline. >> welcome back to "dateline. " >> i'm andrea canning. rasmussen had been murdered in los angeles back in the 1980s. from the outset, her parents told the investigators about several runs sherri had with her husband's ex. now decades later, a cold case detective was focusing his attention on that very same woman, who also happened to be a member of the lapd. here is josh mankiewicz with more of "the smoking gun. " >> for two decades, the lapd had but one narrative for sherri rasmussen's murder. that she was killed by a botched burglary. as science rewrote the script, this cold case suddenly was almost too hot to handle. the prime suspect was a
2:34 am
lapd detective stephanie lazarus. but as jim nuttall went through the murder book, he found almost nothing on lazarus, even though she was the ex-girlfriend of the husband of sherri rasmussen. there was only one notation in the criminology in 1986. a detective had written stephanie lazarus, p. o., police officer. as if her name had come up, but not as a suspect. no notes of any conversation with her? >> no paper trail. >> she seemed to be someone above suspicion. stephanie ilene lazarus had grown up in southern, california, a tomboy of sorts and loved sports. she attended u.c.l.a. where she played basketball. it was
2:35 am
during her college days that she met and dated john ruetten, long before he and sherri got married. after graduating in 1982, lazarus surprised her family by joining the lapd. this when only a handful of women entered the force. >> i don't think i knew that she was applying. >> stephanie's brother, steven. >> i was very proud of steph. i thought it was a cool thing. >> stephanie lazarus quickly rose through the ranks of lapd, from patrol officer to detective. she was popular, friendly, and well-regarded. her assignments also included project d. a. r. e., a drug prevention program aimed at kids. she was twice named detective of the year. later, she worked at internal affairs investigating other officers accused of wrongdoing or corruption, and then promoted to the lapd's art theft unit. her personal life was good, too. in 1996, lazarus got married to another lapd detective. together, they adopted a baby daughter. life both at home and on the job never seemed better. >> she was a happy person. she
2:36 am
loved what she did for work. she loved her husband. loved their life. >> but in 2009, this high achieving cop became the focus of a homicide investigation. jim nuttall and his team of three detectives had to be mindful that lazarus had many friends on the force. her husband worked at the same station as nuttall did. >> we were going to work behind closed doors. we were going to work after hours. we would never leave a paper trail of what we were doing. >> they even gave lazarus a code name -- number 5. and contrary to police procedure, they decided not to tell lapd headquarters that their new suspect was a fellow detective. you're doing that to protect her or to protect your
2:37 am
investigation from her? >> dual purpose. it would protect the integrity of the investigation, and if she was not involved, then nobody would ever know about it. >> four cops knowingly skirted department rules to investigate one of their own. >> it was a difficult phase of her careers. she was one of us. she worked our unit. had worked side-by-side with the people around us. >> but nuttall and his three fellow detectives didn't waiver. they methodically built a case by exhaustingly reviewing the original files and interviewing sherri's friends and family. it became clear to them that stephanie lazarus had the means, the motive, the opportunity to kill sherri rasmussen. she seemed obsessed with john and jealous of his new wife. she was the woman with the scary eyes, who'd been stalking sherri.
2:38 am
>> to nuttall, it seemed to add up. sherri's purse and all of its contents stolen during the crime were recovered soon after the murder, except for one item inside. >> the only thing to this day that was never recovered was john and sherri's marriage certificate. >> after three months of intense secretive investigation, nuttall's team needed one last piece of evidence that would either clear detective lazarus or incriminate her. >> we needed a sample of her dna. our investigators were not cut out for undercover surveillance work. >> so, nuttall finally brought lapd's internal affairs detectives into the loop, hoping they could close the deal by somehow secretly obtaining lazarus'dna. she was tailed for days, as undercover cops waited for her to leave some small piece of herself
2:39 am
behind. finally, at a retail store it happened. lazarus ordered a soft drink and drank it. a trace of her saliva was on the straw, which she then tossed in the trash. it was more than enough for testing. two dna samples separated by two decades. 48 hours later, jim nuttall got call from his supervisor. >> it was real simple. he just said, "it's a match. " >> good feeling, bad feeling? both? >> surreal. that moment, that call, i'll never forget it. >> but stephanie lazarus was still free and had no clue after 23 years, her department was on her tail for murder. detectives wanted to speak to stephanie to elicit a statement, perhaps a confession. but they would have to do it without revealing how deeply implicated she was in sherri rasmussen's murder. so, another secret plan was hatched. this time to get stephanie's side of the story. and all of it would be captured on tape. >> stephanie lazarus is asked by fellow detectives to help in an interrogation, only to discover she's the suspect.
2:40 am
coming up -- they when "dateline" continues. >> they thought, i must have killed her. i mean, come on. subject 3: as a parent, it is your job to protect your family. but here is something that i cannot do. i cannot fix this. i don't know if my daughter is going to be able to walk. i don't know if she's going to make it till tomorrow. [music playing] interviewer: you can join the battle to save lives by supporting st. jude children's research hospital. families never receive a bill from st. jude for treatment, travel, housing, or food so they can focus on helping their child live. subject 4: childhood cancer, there's no escaping it. but st. jude is doing the work, continually researching towards cures, giving more than just my child a chance at life.
2:41 am
interviewer: please, call or go online right now and become a st. jude partner in hope for only $19 a month. subject 5: those donations really matter because we're not going to give up. and when you see other people not giving up on your child, it makes all the difference in the world. interviewer: when you call or go online with your credit or debit card right now, we'll send you this st. jude t-shirt. you can wear to show your support to help st. jude save the lives of these children. subject 6: st. jude is hope. even today after losing a child, it's still about the hope of tomorrow, because. childhood cancer has to end. interviewer: please, call or go online right now. [music playing]
2:42 am
kayaking is my thing. running is awesome. but her moderate to severe eczema would make her skin so uncomfortable. i was always so itchy especially when i was hot. now my skin doesn't itch as much. now we're staying ahead of her eczema. there's a power inside all of us to live our passion. and dupixent works on the inside to help heal your skin from within. it helps block a key source of inflammation inside the body that can cause eczema. so, they can have clearer skin and less itch. serious allergic reactions can occur that can be severe. tell your doctor about new or worsening eye problems such as eye pain or vision changes including blurred vision, joint aches and pain, or a parasitic infection. don't change or stop asthma medicines without talking to your doctor. healing from within is a wonderful thing. ask your child's eczema specialist how dupixent can help
2:43 am
heal their skin from within. >> june 5th, 2009, started routinely routinely enough for lapd detective stephanie lazarus. she took the train to union station in downtown l.a. reporting for her normal shift that morning at police headquarters in parker center. after arriving, stephanie was
2:44 am
told to meet with two detectives. the man she didn't know from lapd's elite robbery homicide division, to help them interrogate a suspect involving some stolen art work, which was stephanie's beat as a detective. so lazarus went down to a secured area in the basement to meet with her two colleagues in a small interview room. because it's part of the jail, all cops who enter here are required to give up their guns. unarmed and unsuspecting, lazarus didn't realize she was being recorded by an undercover camera. >> i don't know if you know my partner. >> hi. >> have a seat. >> that is when detectives revealed that this conversation wasn't about art. >> do you know john ruetten? >> john ruetten? john ruetten?
2:45 am
>> you said you dated john. how long did you guys date? >> i mean, what? are you guys -- is this something -- i mean, you said i was going to interview somebody about art and now you're -- >> detective lazarus seemed uncomfortable and vague in her answers, especially when detectives asked about sherri rasmussen. >> you know, i may have talked to her. i -- it sound -- i-- >> you mentioned a hospital maybe. you may have talked to her in a hospital? >> yeah. yeah. i may have -- you know, i'm thinking back now. you guys are bringing up all of these old memories. >> detectives turned up the heat. >> did you ever fight with her? >> you mean like fight? >> yeah. did you ever duke it
2:46 am
out with her? >> no, i don't think so. >> you'd remember that, right? that would be a pretty -- >> yeah, i think so. >> most of us can remember, without much difficulty, the number of fist fights we have had over the course of our lives. but while detective lazarus, at one point, answers no, when asked if she remembers
2:47 am
attacking sherri or being attacked, at other points she can't recall if that happened. >> it doesn't sound familiar. i mean, what are they saying? i fought with her so i -- i -- getting the jump of the leap? they are saying, i fought her, so i must have killed her? i mean, come on. >> after about 45 minutes, lazarus realized she was the prime suspect in sherri's murder. >> now you're accusing me of this? is that what you're -- is that what you're saying? >> we are trying to figure out what happened, stephanie. >> well, i was -- you know, i'm just saying. you know? do i need to get a lawyer? you're accusing me? >> moments later, it came to an end, as it must have felt uncomfortable as all of them. >> i know you guys have had to do your job and i guess i have to contact somebody, so... >> that's fair. >> i mean, because i know how this stuff works. >> and then stephanie lazarus was read the same words she, herself, had read to hundreds of suspects over the years. >> stephanie, you know you have the right to remain silent? do you understand? >> yes. >> and for just a moment, you can see the handcuffs placed on her by her fellow officers. >> i'm like in shock. i'm totally in shock. >> word of lazarus'arrest traveled fast to tucson, where detective nuttall was standing by to deliver the news to the rasmussen family. tell me what you said. >> you were right, folks. you folks were right and i apologize that it took us over two decades to give them that closure. >> you feel better? >> the most gratifying moment of my career. >> i was extremely happy. i said, i feel like i knew it all along. >> back in l.a., the lazarus family also got the news. >> well, it was numbing. >> i'm guessing that one of the things you said or thought was, they got it wrong somehow. this is a mistake. >> absolutely. >> some error has been made here? >> yes. it will be cleared up
2:48 am
by the end of the day, yeah. >> it didn't happen? >> didn't happen. >> stephanie lazarus didn't go home that day after her arrest. bail was set at $10 million. much higher than most murder cases. the judge considered her a flight risk, citing the strong case against her, and for the lapd? it was a bittersweet day. a 23-year-old cold case they believed had finally been cracked, but the prime suspect worked right beside them. for the rasmussen family, stephanie's arrest was a vindication, but it also brought back their memory of the original lapd. >> i think she was a police officer, so they figured they would cover this one up. >> the family hired a prominent l.a. attorney john taylor, who filed a lawsuit against detective lazarus and also the lapd, claiming the department
2:49 am
deliberately ignored clues that pointed to a fellow officer. >> the earlier missteps of lapd weren't missteps. they were intentional conduct, intentional ignoring of evidence, and intentional dereliction of duties. >> beyond just being sloppy, or the fact they didn't close the case and they didn't listen to the family, those two things are not evidence of a cover-up. >> it wasn't that they didn't close the case. they didn't do anything to create a case. >> he says that in 1986, the detectives were protecting stephanie lazarus. >> they actively covered up the identity of the person who committed this crime. >> the rasmussen's lawsuit alleging a cover-up was dismissed in 2011. charlie beck was then the lapd chief and he spoke with us about the case. >> i can accept somebody that
2:50 am
is unable to solve a crime that is solvable. i cannot accept somebody that covers up a crime or covers up an individual involved in a crime and i have no -- absolutely no indication that is what happened here. >> there is intoing to suggest they deliberately looked away from stephanie or not a road they didn't want to go down? >> i think it was a lack of ability, not an act to exclude stephanie. >> in february of 2012, nearly 26 years to the day since sherri rasmussen's murder, stephanie lazarus would have her day in court. a chance to clear her name and reputation, and to show that dna isn't always right and that the los angeles police department had it all wrong. >> coming up, did the lapd have it wrong? >> john was still -- and stephanie went to tell sherri, look, you guys are getting married, i'm telling him not to call me. >> we, the jury, in the above entitled action, find the defendant, stephanie ilene lazarus -- >> when "dateline" continues.
2:51 am
2:52 am
2:53 am
2:54 am
first time i connected with kim, she told me that her husband had passed. and that he took care of all of the internet connected devices in the home. i told her, “i'm here to take care of you.” connecting with kim... made me reconnect with my mom. it's very important to keep loved ones close. we know that creating memories with loved ones brings so much joy to your life. a family trip to the team usa training facility. i don't know how to thank you. lot at stake at the murder i'm here to thank you. trial of lapd detective stephanie lazarus who stood accused of murdering sherri rasmussen. the prosecution believed the dna evidence was
2:55 am
their smoking gun. but the defense said it was tainted. what would the jury believe? here is josh mankiewicz with the conclusion of "the smoking gun". >> it took 26 years to get here. a generation of false leads, missed opportunities. a family's frustration. a police department's nightmare. february 6th, 2012. the people versus stephanie lazarus finally began in a courtroom in downtown los angeles. the prosecution laid out a clear case of how stephanie lazarus was deeply in with john ruetten and was devastated when he became engaged to sherri. then executed her and covered it up by staging a burglary. linda deutsch of the associated press covered the trial. >> the opening statement by the prosecutor was quite dramatic. and he came up with a theme
2:56 am
which was the case was about a bite, a bullet, a gun barrel, and a broken heart. and that kind of resonated in the courtroom. >> the jury saw journals police seized from stephanie's home detailing how upset she was when she learned john was engaged to someone else. stephanie's date book was also introduced which mentioned locksmithing books, that could explain why there was no forced entry to the condo. and on the day of the murder, then patrol officer lazarus happened to be off duty. the ammunition used in the shooting was the same type issued by the lapd, said prosecutors. and was the same caliber of lazarus'off-duty weapon. a.38 revolver she reported stolen just two weeks after the murder. but the real smoking gun was the bite mark dna found at the crime scene. >> dna was definitely the centerpiece of this case. this
2:57 am
shows she was there. without the dna, they could not have placed her at the condo. >> and the statistics were staggering. a 1. 7 sextillion to one chance that the dna belonged to someone other than stephanie lazarus. defense attorney mark overland aggressively attacked that dna evidence and insisted it was mishandled and improperly stored and sealed which compromised the sample. >> the vile was protruding, rather than being inside the envelope and sealed in order to protect the integrity of the evidence. you can't rely on the scientific results. >> overland said that hair, blood, fingerprints found at the crime scene did not come from lazarus. as for the weapon the fired the fatal shots? he insisted several other types of guns besides stephanie that could have fired those bullets. as for motive? the defense argued there was no evidence
2:58 am
that stephanie lazarus was obsessessed with sherri's husband, john. >> john was still calling her. and stephanie went to tell sherri, look, you guys are getting married, i'd tell him not to call me. >> after five weeks, it was up to the jury. loretta and nels rasmussen had waited a lot longer than that. the two of you feel confident? >> as confident as you can be with a jury. you never know what a jury is going to do. >> we the jury, in the above entitled action, find stephanie ilene lazarus guilty of the crime of murder of sherri rasmussen. we further find the murder was of the first-degree. >> the day the rasmussen family thought would never come, finally did. as their attorney john taylor explained --
2:59 am
>> the family is overwhelmingly relieved that, again, their suspicions and today's verdict reflects and confirms the identity of the person who killed their daughter, and the intent with which she did it. it's a tremendous relief. >> for the lazarus family, their wife, daughter, sister, and once decorated detective, was now a convicted killer. >> we really did not expect this result with the state of the evidence and the way mr. overland presented the case, so it's devastating. >> for the lapd, a cold case was finally solved, but with painful side effects. >> i'm very pleased, but it's bittersweet. and i'm thrilled that the conclusion has been reached and that some form of justice has been brought to a family that has grieved for far too long. we would much rather that this not be a los angeles police detective. that's for sure. i've known stephanie for 5 years. this is a tragedy on a bunch of levels. this is not something that we are proud of
3:00 am
in that we had a los angeles police detective involved here. >> stephanie lazarus was sentenced to 27 years to life in prison. as for that wrongful death civil lawsuit that sherri rasmussen's parents filed against lazarus, they were awarded $10 million. and so, ended the case of a detective finally caught by her very own department. she almost got away with it. >> the perfect murder. almost committed the perfect murder. >> and who better to do that than a police officer? >> than a police officer. >> that's all for this edition of "dateline." i'm natalie morales. thanks for watching. ♪ ♪ ♪ >> versus our, an exchange of

175 Views

1 Favorite

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on