the united states in the lead up to world war ii. his job was to spread propaganda for the in the united states. this guy was charged and convicted of being a agent in the u.s. and he was a relatively well-known figure, so it was relatively big news when he was charged and convicted. front page of the "new york times", for example. the bigger scandal about him was that he got a bunch of neighbors of congress to participate in this propaganda thing. g. time. the same guy. and the first time it was for being a nazi agent. the second time, it was not just for him personally being a nazi agent, it was a much bigger indictment. for him being part of a large seditious conspiracy against the united states. and that is when members of congress who had been working

with him realized that what they had done with him working with o convicted nazi agent, they realized what they had done wita him was probably going to come out at that trial and that would be a bad look, so they decided to take action. one particularly powerful senator who was implicated in p this thing went to the attorneyi general and basically threatened the attorney general that he would tie the doj up in knots, he would go after the attorney general himself unless the attorney general fired the prosecutor who was leading this case. and the senator had kind of a hook for doing this. the prosecutor he wanted fired had just been criticized by the court because when he was n prosecuting that nazi agent, th court said he spoke with basically too much passion, witk too much emotion about that defendant in front of the jury. so the prosecutor had been criticized in court. that was the hook they used for

going after him. and you know, that's not exactly a capital offense as a prosecutor. nobody believed that was the pr real reason this senator wanted the prosecutor fired. but you know, it was something, and it made for a good pretext.o and sure enough, that corrupt pressure from the senator who himself was implicated in this criminal investigation, it turned out to be enough., it worked. that prosecutor actually was turfed out, taken off the case.o and by doing that, by taking that prosecutor off that case, h the case against the nazi agent and all the accused seditionists, it was really screwed up. it was delayed and delayed and delayed. it was years. they had to bring in a new prosecutor. he had to restart the whole investigation, rebuild the whole

thing from the ground up, start the whole thing over. finally the new prosecutor brought the case to trial, and surprise, it happened again. why wouldn't it? the senators and members of congress who were implicated in this plot, this scheme of literally working with a nazi agent, those members of congress made a big show out of coming to the courtroom to show their support for the defendants.e inveighing on the floor of the l house and senate against the prosecution, they supplied lawyers and legal advice to the defendants. they brought all the political pressure they could to bear against that prosecution as much as they can to turn it into a circus, they had the right-wing press denounce that prosecution, denounce the prosecutors themselves. but the evident in the case was strong. the prosecutor in the case e ultimately was able to go bl through the german government's own files about the nazi secret operations in america, and sure enough, those files showed evidence that two dozen members of congress and senators had ta

taken part in this scheme, in this lavishly funded nazi is propaganda scheme in the united states. that's bad news, right? one of those senators whose name turned up in those files decided wow, this can't stand. this has to be done away with. and so he applied political pressure. he went to the president, he went to the justice department, and demanded again that the prosecutor be fired. that the second prosecutor be b fired, and he was.os he was fired as well. the senator demanded that this evidence about which members of congress had done this, had worked with the nazis, he zi demanded that evidence should be shelved and kept secret by the justice department, and it was. and the prosecutor was fired, th the justice department just folded.st they killed the whole thing off because of political pressure from powerful people who were fu implicated in that very seriousi criminal case. and this is not a hypothetical

or a fable or something. it's not a metaphor. i'm not comparing the nazis to something else. this is actually a thing from history. this was a thing. t this was the actual freaking nazis, and this happened in our country. the great sedition trial in the 1940s was about americans who were working with the nazis, and the way it all resolved in the end is that right-wing members of congress who themselves were implicated in the plot, they put so much pressure to bear on that prosecution that they slowed it down, they turned it into the object of a weird conservative pressure campaign. they smeared the prosecutors. they got them removed from the case, they got them fired.he they ultimately dismantled that whole effort to prosecute that as a crime to expose it and to get accountability. they blew it up. and the defendants who were allegedly involved in that terrible scheme, they all walked, they got away. and so i wrote a book about this.

i did a podcast about it, i traveled all around the country in the past year giving talks and interviews about it. what i found in doing that, when you talk about this story, you quickly get to two things. number one, what happened to all those people who got away with this?le what happened because of that?ne season two of the podcast comes out next month and i'll tell yon the answer to that. i'll give you the spoiler alert is that it's not good news. but the other legacy of this is the legal scandal. right? the scandal of politicians using their political power to mess with the justice system. to pervert a prosecution. using their political power to monkey wrench the legal system for their own benefit. how did they get away with that? and how come we don't know that story? i now after studying this for a long time firmly believe that we don't know that story because it's a bad news story about our

country and its vulnerabilities. and its past failures.st it is in no one's interest to tell that story. the justice system doesn't want it to be known that they caved to craven political pressure to scuttle a case. the politicians who applied the pressure or who caved to the pressure themselves, they don't want to brag about it. the people who got the brunt of it, the people who got fired, op pushed out of their jobs for doing their jobs in the legal system, the prosecutors and investigators who got fired as part of this corruption of the legal system, those prosecutors and investigators personally were crushed. they were smeared and discredited and destroyed. they were in no position to tell the story either. so the story mostly was not ei told. but we need to know that story and stories like that because we

need to be on notice that that sometimes happens in america. that that's our track record as a country. that is what has happened in this country when powerful people have been implicated in major crimes. sometimes what happens is the legal system and the people in it get attacked and get crushed by people with political power,i and that's how the prosecutions go away. because those attacks work. and they can be devastating. unless someone defends the people who are in the legal a system trying to make it work. unless someone defends the justice system when powerful people are implicated in crimes and are charged for it, and ther go after the justice system because of it. are we capable of doing that? now, today? what is the consequence to the legal system, to the judiciary, when people with political

power, people with political power and a personal stake in the outcome of a big case try to break the system? because they don't like that the system is holding them accountable. what happens when they bring political pressure for politica. reasons to bear on what is supposed to be an independent b process.be because prosecutors and judges and the legal system are not supposed to be bullied and gao threatened and intimidated and pressures and maneuvered out of their jobs because they brought a prosecution that affects powerful people. they're not supposed to be subject to that. if they are subject to that kind of pressure, the scandal ought to be not on the prosecutors and investigators themselves who are getting smeared and attacked and intimidated and threatened. the scandal ought to be on the head of these people who have brought that pressure to bear.et it should be a shame they can be never live down. it should be certainly disqualifying from any role in american public life.

i mean, in the 1940s, it is a scandal that senator burton wheeler of montana was involved in a gross nazi agents propaganda plot in the united states senate, and he was.at but if you're asking me, it is a bigger scandal that senator burton wheeler got the prosecutors fired who were looking into it. got them fired and professionally destroyed. it's a bigger scandal for him, and frankly, it's a bigger scandal for our justice system. it's a bigger scandal for the r u.s. justice department which gave in to his pressure. bringing criminal cases is hard. bringing criminal cases against people involved in politics is i hard and it is a very high pressure thing for good reason. we rightfully want our criminal justice system and our political system to operate independently from one another, almost all of the time, right? you shouldn't have to worry about having the cops or the

feds sicced on you by your political opponents because you are a person in political office or in a politically sensitive job. you also shouldn't be able to get away with committing crimest because you have political stature or political power of some kind. p we don't want the criminal an justice system and the political system to interact except when they absolutely have to. having people in high office committing crimes is very bad. it's very difficult stuff for us as a country. better to not elect criminals so we never have to deal with it, o but occasionally it happens. when it happens, we ought to get real about what it means. and where our pinch points and breaking points are as a country. because what history tells us, and what today's news tells us is that when prosecutors and judges and witnesses and juriesw are involved in a prosecution that targets politically powerful people, they will be

targeted with retaliatory pressure and intimidation and ultimately harm. and if we are going to protect the rule of law in this country, we must somehow figure out a way to shield them from it. it is political pressure that is being brought to bear against them, it must be political pressure that is brought to bear to hold that craven influence back and to protect these people. like meets like. you need the same kind of force up against that kind of force. we need to stop being pollyanna about this. when powerful people are charged with crimes, corrupt pressure on the legal system happens on their behalf. the pressure happens. and it works. it worked in the 1940s. it is working now. and yes, sometimes there's some stupid hook that they try to use as a pretext for these attacks.

but they don't even need that, right? for the legal system to function fairly, even when politically powerful people are under scrutiny for alleged crimes, we must expect attacks on the people who carry out the work of the legal system in that context and we must expect that they will need to be protected and defended and then we must stand up to protect and defend them. and we should be making sure that they are not the ones who alone have to stand there and pay the cost, right?ve this ought to not be a scandal they they are the ones that pay the cost for. it should be a scandal on the head of people who bringing corrupt pressure to bear to break our system, to protect sy powerful people. if we have learned anything frol history, we ought to have learned that about the intersection of political power and the law. if we have learned anything we ought to have learned that. so here's my question. who's defending fani willis? i was at the courthouse today for the new york state

prosecution of trump in the hush money case from the 2016 election. another fascinating day in court. michael cohen finishing his testimony, prosecution resting their case. the defense brought on a witness who so insulted the judge, the judge stopped everything and d cleared the courtroom and reamed him out. fascinating day. there's going to be more g testimony tomorrow. looks like the closing statements might be tuesday of next week. and then it will be in the hands of the jury, and i have no idea how that's going to turn out. the jury will have it likely l some time next week. it's been fascinating all along. it will be very, very interesting to watch the way this wraps up and closing arguments, summations, and thens of course, what the jury tells us after their deliberations. nothing against that case, right, but it is astonishing this is the only one of the indictments against trump, the stormy daniels pay to cover up the affair hush money case.

this is the only one that's going to go to trial before the election. really? wasn't supposed to be the first one. remember what was going to be the first one? what was going to be the first one was a trial of donald trump for the big issue, right, for him trying to throw out the results of the 2020 election. t so he could stay in power even though he lost. prosecutors asked the judge to start this trial two months ago. the first trial date they asked for was in early march 2024. and had they been able to go ahead with the trial, there would be cameras in court, live broadcasting the proceedings. that's what was going to be first. georgia prosecutors led by fani willis brought a rico indictment against trump and 18 other alleged coconspirators for trying to overthrow the 2020 presidential election in er georgia. that was going to be first. t what happened to that? well, when it emerged, january 2021, that there was a recordini

of trump live on the phone demanding that georgia officials falsify the election results anh declare him the winner, when everybody heard that tape, everybody over the age of zero in this country knew there would have to be a criminal investigation of that. i mean, that very much sounded t like the commission of a very obvious crime on tape. the district attorney in the county where the phone call took place then opened that criminal investigation. of course, she did. how could she not have? then what happened? they opened the floodgates on her. in a way that is underappreciated in this country. first thing they did, th republicans in the state legislator decided for the first time in the history of that state, they needed to give themselves a new power. they needed to give themselves the power to remove prosecutors from their jobs. even in the middle of a case. the republicans in the georgia state legislature never wanted that power before now in the whole history of the state.

but now that trump is under investigation for a crime, now they want that new power. this new law giving themselves that power, they passed it in such a rush, it suffered from what you might charitably call constitutional infirmities. they then had to pass it again, so they did. in so doing, they created a board with all republican appointees. it has a brand-new power under the laws of the state of georgia to discipline and remove prosecutors in the middle of their cases.s. a power they never had before, never wanted before, not before fani willis brought a case against donald trump. but that was only the start. led by one of the republicans who served as a fake elector ind georgia, republicans in that state then formed a georgia f senate special committee on investigations.ci oh, what investigations are they wanting to do?g they are specifically investigating fani willis.g they formed a new committee just for that purpose.d the head of that new committee to investigate fani willis wenth to the georgia state republicang convention this weekend to brag about how he's about to subpoena her.

to testify under oath and force her to hand over evidence to the republicans in the georgia state senate. they're characterizing it as a financial concern, but he's been very explicit that the financial concern he has is that she's expending financial resources on the trump prosecution. republicans at the county level in georgia are now saying they want to put her office through an audit. a republican member of congress from georgia has filed an ethics complaint against her. the republicans chairman of the house judiciary committee in washington, republican , congressman jim jordan, has opened an investigation of her n in washington as well. and has subpoenaed her, and is p now threatening to hold her in contempt of congress, threatening to put her in jail. and now two republican u.s. senators are jumping in as well. senators ron johnson and chuck grassley. just announcing a few days ago that they too are going to openc a new investigation of this georgia prosecutor, fani willis. this time opening this

investigation in the united states senate. they have created a maelstrom of political harassment and pressure, bringing it down to bear on this one prosecutor like a laser. because she brought this case against someone of their party. who has political power. this is republicans using their political power to try to shut off the legal system, to try to shut off the rule of law here so it cannot be used against their guy, against trump. and yes, they also found themselves a hook. burton wheeler, back in the '40s, he got the prosecutor taken down when he was criticized for speaking too passionately about the nazi agent he was prosecuting. it was not the kind of offense that ought to get a prosecutor fired from leading the biggest sedition investigation in the history of the country, but it v was enough of a hook for his enemies to create a pretext for their attack for getting rid of

him. and fani willis' case, she dated someone on her prosecution team. you probably heard about that. but you know what, in georgia, romantic relationships are not grounds for disqualifying prosecutors. the georgia supreme court has held that not only is dating someone not a conflict in a no prosecution, they have actually held that it is not a conflict for a prosecutor and a defense t attorney on opposite sides of a case to be married to each other. like, just not an issue under georgia ethics rules. and you may or may not like that fani willis dated someone, but that is not grounds for disqualification of a prosecutor in georgia. and that is not the reason they're trying to nuke fani willis as a prosecutor. let's get real about this. and take it seriously.t because what's going on here is they are taking apart the judicial system.

they are fundamentally changing the judiciary in the state, in the entire state, all to protecr this one powerful defendant in their own party, who she had the temerity to charge.o even though he has political power. and this is a test for us as a country. and so far, the person who is bearing the entire brunt of this is fani willis herself, personally and alone. and she is fighting, and she is not backing down. >> you're confused. you think i'm on trial.i' these people are on trial for le trying to steal an election in 2020. i'm not on trial. no matter how hard you try to put me on trial. >> they can continue on with their games. i'll continue do the work of the game.nu >> isn't it interesting when we have a bunch of african american d.a.s, now we need daddy to tell us what to do. w today i'm here so i can reach my

community. this is really messing up my business. they can look all they want. the d.a.s office has done everything according to the of book. we're following the law. they can keep looking. i'm not interested in them te looking. i'm sorry they're pissed off. lady justice is blind. everybody can get it. i can prosecute high profile cases and i can prosecutor everyday cases when they need to be prosecuted. >> i don't care how rich you are, how powerful you think you are, who your daddy is, what your political party might be. how much money you think you got. and how evil your supporters are. i don't care how many times they threaten me. i will gladly leave this place knowing i did god's work. >> fani willis is ably defending herself. she is good at this. and she knew what she was walking into. but this story for all of us,

this is not a profile in courage. this is a profile in cowardice. this is a profile in failure and neglect by us, by the country, because the reason she is out there defending herself so ably is because nobody else is defending her. she's standing alone against all of this. the rule of law depends on the people who enforce it being able to enforce it, even when those who are implicated in a legal proceeding are powerful people. these are human beings. they are not magic. they are not bulletproof. they are not superhuman. and right now, they have no one defending them as they're being asked to bear superhuman pressure and threats. and i get it that there is a sort of good faith instinct against defending these folks. for americans who believe in the independence and professionalism

of the judiciary, why step up politically and defend a judge or prosecutor? that's supposed to be a non-political part of our system, right? right, true. but here in reality, in this era of this republican party, there is a ton of inappropriate bl political pressure.f improper, craven, pretextual dishonest pressure brought on judges and prosecutors from the right, from the allies of the p former president, and it is working. and there has been no significant countervailing pressure defending them. if you go after a judge's family, if you demonize a prosecutor and bring bogus allegations and charges against them, it is you who are breaking the american legal system. and you ought to be the one who pays for that.t. i mean, thus far, what's the price been? other than getting heckled by fed-up new yorkers on the sidewalk sometimes, the republicans who are waging war

on the legal system proclaiming the illegitimacy of the legal system on behalf of donald be trump, up until now, they're paying no cost for it. i mean, in georgia, republicansg there want credit for not having all immediately jumped up to flip the election result in 2020 when trump told them to. congratulations. t great. kind of a minimum, but good. good on you. now, though, what the georgia republican party is doing is dismantling the independent judicial system in that state for the purpose of destroying fani willis and thereby destroying the case against donald trump. that, too, is the record of thep georgia republican party in the era of trump. and they have help from congress and they have help from the u.s. senate, and honestly, they have had help from the media who too uncritically has been going along with it, assuming oh, where there's smoke there must be fire. oh, they're attacking her so she must be controversial. oh, they say something bad about her so there must be something

bad about her. the history of the rule of law e in this country tells us that the rule of law does not magically defend itself. and it is mortal. it can be killed when it is attacked, it breaks. the rule of law in this country in practical terms is made up of people doing hard jobs who themselves can break when they're attacked. and right now, you and i, all of us, we are making history in this country. and the history that we're making is there's no one defending fani willis but herself. and in the, you know, noble, alternate version of this history that we would like to imagine we would be part of, the whole country would be up in arms about georgia and about new york and about all of these cases, telling these people to i back off the judges, back off he the witnesses and the jurors. back off the prosecutors. back off fani willis. protect these cases. protect the rule of law.es we imagine that's who we are as a country, but we are not b showing it. we're not standing up to defend

these people. at least not yet. fani willis joins us next. illis. when enamel is gone, you cannot get it back. but you can repair it with pronamel repair. it penetrates deep into the tooth to actively repair acid weakened enamel. i recommend pronamel repair. with new pronamel repair mouthwash you can enhance that repair beyond brushing. they work great together.

and they're all coming? those who are still that rewith us, yes.rushing. grandpa! what's this? your wings. light 'em up! gentlemen, it's a beautiful... ...day to fly.

joining us now for the interview is fulton county, georgia, district attorney fani willis. d.a. willis i really appreciate you making time to be here. i know you don't do live television interviews very often. it's an honor to have you here. >> thank you for having me this evening. >> let me start by asking you about what your life has been like and how things have changed over the course of this past year. i know you have body guards. i know you had to leave your home because of ongoing threats against you. i saw footage last week at an event honoring the south fulton police.

you got a little emotional thanking the police for having kept you safe in what has been a remarkably threatening environment for you. i wonder what effect the sort of constant threat of violence that you have been living with has had on you and on your ability to do your work. >> well, thank you for asking. not many people ask about what is the personal journey that's been going on. and it really hasn't been happening in the last year. it's been happening since about a month after i took office. i began to get threats. those threats come in the way of emails. those threats come in the way of phone calls. text messages, any which way you can imagine. at some point, the threats became where i had to leave my home. i have been out of my home since the first year in office. they have come from a variety of sources. one of the first things that ever happened was there was a protest at my house at 5:00 in

the morning, people mad because the last administration had left police cases, lots of them, and they wanted immediate action on them. so that was the first thing that kind of happened. but the threats have certainly been about lots of different kinds of cases i prosecuted. people are very unhappy with them. because of some recent cases that most of them are racial in nature. it has caused me to leave my home, financially i'm paying for my mortgage because i refuse to give up the home where i raise my children, but also paying for another establishment, and i have 24-hour really protection around me. so it's a very interesting way to live. but it's well worth it to have the honor of being the first female district attorney in fulton county. it pales in comparison to what my victims are going through. and the reality is, one of the reasons we are upsetting people is we're so successful here in fulton county. i have the third largest crime drop in america. we have it because we're taking a balanced approach.

both unapologetically going after gangs and violent criminals and anyone who violates the law in my county and we're also doing programs. it has been a huge sacrifice, but it's well worth it for my community. >> we spoke, you did an interview with me earlier in your tenure, and we talked about what it was like to become a national lightning rod and to attract not just all the attention that a district attorney in a big place like fulton county is always going to get locally for the important issues that affect the people of fulton county, but to become a household name around the country, including by people who decided they were going to make your life hell for having brought one particularly high profile case. do you fell like you have changed over the course of this term in office and over the course of this four years in terms of having to develop new skills, new resources, develop a thicker skin than you might not have expected when you took this case -- when you ascended to office january 1st, 2020?

>> this job has certainly made me closer to god because you have to go into prayer often. so that's just the truth. that's a positive, right? when you're getting closer to god. but i can't explain to you how much i love the work that i do. i can't explain to you how loved i feel by my community. you really should feel sorry for those that are trying to deter me from my work. it doesn't do anything but motivate me to continue to work and to work hard. and so i'm not someone that's going to be broken, but certainly, it has caused me to get thicker skin or to be more resilient, to dig deeper, to work harder. what it has not done is deter me from my work. >> let me ask you about an interesting development that happened with the former democratic governor of georgia, governor roy barnes. it emerged over the course of the trump case and some of the forgive me, the mishegas around that that you had asked governor barnes if he would consider

joining the prosecution, special counsel in that case, and it emerged that he said no, saying, quote, i wasn't going to live with bodyguards for the rest of my life, which is a commentary on what it takes to become part of the legal system in this cara, taking on politically powerful people. but governor barnes as far as i understand it has since offered if the republican controlled legislature in georgia comes after you with this new investigative committee that they seem to have formed specifically to come after you, and some of the other ways they seem to be targeting you, if you need legal representation of a specialty form as part of the way they're coming after you through the legislature, he will represent you in those matters. i wanted to ask if that's your understanding and what you make of that, those interactions you have had with former governor barnes. >> governor barnes is my attorney. they have decided in georgia that they would like to come after me. they use false reasons for

wanting to come after me. i don't know if you remember, and i believe we talked about it last time. georgia had never had a prosecutorial oversight committee, and all of a sudden, 14 minorities were elected to office to serve as district attorney. and now, all of a sudden, they need an oversight committee to look after district attorneys because they want to tell us how to prosecute and who to prosecute and where we should put our resources. as opposed to allowing the voters that put us in these seats to make those determinations. the voters in my community are very clear that they want crime out of their communities, but they want it done both by removing violent offenders which is what we have done. we have gone after gangs and we worked with our police departments to do so. they also want second chances for low-level offenders, and we have done those programs. what is so ironic is although it's only 14 of the 50 d.a.s in the state of georgia, most of

the citizens report to our jurisdictions. so although we're smaller in number than the other 36, most of the population has elected these minority d.a.s to serve them and has trusted their judgment. but apparently, we now need daddy to tell us how to do our job. >> d.a. willis, i just gave a little bit of a secular sermon or kind of a secular reaming out to the country for not stepping up more to defend you, as you have borne these sticks and stones from your political opponents and for political reasons. i have to take a quick break, but if you don't mind sticking with us, on the other side of the break, i would like to talk to you about a few of the people who are now starting to stand up for you and ask you what that means to you, if you could be with us for one more break. >> thank you. >> all right, we'll be right back with fulton county d.a. fani willis. in just a moment. stay with us. in just a moment stay with us (♪♪)

try dietary supplements from voltaren, for healthy joints.

what is cirkul? cirkul is the fuel you need to take flight. cirkul is the energy that gets you to the next level. cirkul is what you hope for when life tosses lemons your way. cirkul, available at walmart and drinkcirkul.com.

the man has been indicted by a federal grand jury for allegedly threatening fulton county district attorney fani willis. the u.s. attorney's office for the northern district of georgia says the man railed against d.a. willis' prosecution of former president donald trump in youtube live streams. at one point, he's accused of saying d.a. willis will, quote, be killed like a dog. he said to be formally arraigned in atlanta next month. >> california man indicted earlier this month is the second person to face federal criminal

charges for threatening to kill fulton county d.a. fani willis, the first was a man from alabama. together, they represent a small fraction of the threats that fani willis has received in the nine months since she began prosecuting donald trump and in the couple years since she first started investigating that matter. she travels with bodyguards. he's been forced to leave her home, while former president trump continues to attack her relentlessly to his supporters. and as republicans at the county, state, and federal level do everything they can to undermine and impugn and stymie her work and smear her personally. this level of sustained public attack is not usually the price of entry for doing your job as a district attorney, nor should it be in a country where the rule of law is supposedly the rule. the ability of prosecutors and judges to do their jobs without fear is a fundamental test of our democracy. whether you like the georgia criminal case against former president trump or not, fani willis is one of the bellwethers for the rule of law in this country.

back with us now is the fulton county district attorney, ms. willis. ms. willis, i was interested to see in the atlanta journal constitution today, there were three democratic state senators who published an opinion piece saying, quote, we are witnessing a concerted effort by trump and maga republican politicians to cast doubt on the legitimate and strong fulton county election interference case by attacking the prosecutor. it's an effort that takes advantage of every avenue of government power to which trump's allies have access. their goal, delay accountability for trump's alleged attempt to illegally overturn a presidential election. this strikes me very close to my heart because i feel like this is one of the first times i have seen people standing up for you on this point. i wanted to ask how it strikes you. do you agree with their assessment of what's going on? >> well, as you know, let's start with the federal government and jim jordan. jim jordan has time after time

after time attacked my office with no legitimate purpose. anyone who knows jim jordan's history knows that he only has the purpose of trying to interfere in a criminal investigation. he has now turned his tricks to he's going to look at grant programs which i invite him to do, and we have complied with his subpoenas. but yet he continues his attacks to try to interfere in a criminal investigation. while -- all while his jurisdiction has one of the worst crime rates, has poverty issues, and not one time has he used his position to try to investigate people who are attacking me and attacking others legitimately doing their jobs. making him illegitimate in his position, and it's disgusting. so i bring that up at the federal level because now at the state level, they have decided to follow this clown's lead. and they want to now try to interfere in an investigation. and it's not legitimate either. so it shall fail, and it's not

going to go anywhere. but they are trying to attack me at every level. as you know, today is an exciting day for me because i'm on a ballot tomorrow. i have a democratic challenger and i plan to win and win big tomorrow. but i also have a republican challenger coming up in november, who is unqualified, been practicing law for less than four years, has never practiced criminal law, but has got pacs supporting her, already has the national democratic -- excuse me, the national republican party as well as the local republican party supporting her. and so i am thankful to those three democrats who stood up for what is right. but i am at a point where i need fulton county voters to get out and vote. i need people around the country to support me big and small, to

say that we are going to be a country that still believes in the rule of law. we are not going to allow people to be attacked while they do their job. having prosecutors that are free from interference and are allowed to just look at cases, look at the facts, and if people broke the law, to bring charges, has to go on for us to live in a free society. the sad part, though, for all of them, ms. maddow, is it doesn't matter how many times they attack me. i am not going to be broken and i'm still going to be standing here doing my job lawfully. >> fulton county district attorney fani willis, i know it's a very busy time with the primary tomorrow and with everything going on in your life and the slings and arrows you're dealing with. thank you for being willing to talk with me and my audience tonight about this and good luck to you. stay safe. >> thank you. >> thank you. we'll be right back. stay with us. stay with us

this one ends with a bang. a few weeks ago, a grand jury in arizona indicted 18 people including rudy giuliani for their role in trump's fake elector scheme. to try to falsify the 2020 election results to make it look like trump won in states where biden actually won. before criminal proceedings can start, prosecutors have to first serve all of the defendants. they have to physically deliver them a court summons which is basically a formal notice that they have been charged with a crime. while in this arizona case, one by one, the prosecutors have

been serving all of the defendants charged in this case. except for one they were having a hard time with. the day after the charges were filed, officials from the arizona attorney general's office flew to new york to serve rudy giuliani. they went to rudy giuliani's apartment, but the prosecutors were turned away by the doorman. they then tried calling him over and over and over again. no one would answer. for three weeks, prosecutors said they could not locate rudy giuliani to serve him his criminal summons. they need to give it to him in person. well, this weekend, rudy giuliani celebrated his 80th birthday in florida. unencumbered by that criminal summons. naturally, he decided to taunt the arizona attorney general about it. he took this awkward selfie with his friends or maybe his dental hygienists, i don't know, with people who came to his birthday party, and he tweeted this picture at the arizona attorney general writing, quote, if

arizona authorities cannot find me by tomorrow morning, they must dismiss the indictment. now, the problem here was that at the very moment mr. giuliani was sending that tweet, agents from the arizona attorney general's office were out in the parking lot waiting to serve mr. giuliani his court papers at his own birthday party. "the washington post" reports that prosecutors waited outside the party for some time watching guests arrive and leave. when one of the agents said his name, mr. giuliani asked who they were. quote, they identified themselves as agents of the arizona attorney general's office, adding, quote, and you've been served. so exactly 74 minutes after rudy giuliani taunted the arizona attorney general on twitter, you can't serve me, the attorney general was able to post this. quote, the final defendant was served moments ago. rudy giuliani, nobody is above the law. in that arizona case, at least

ten of the defendants are going to be arraigned in front of a judge tomorrow. some in person, some by zoom. now that rudy giuliani has been served, he, too, can advance to the arraignment stage of his criminal proceedings in that state, as of tonight, we're unsure if rudy giuliani will be among the group of defendants who is going to be arraigned tomorrow, but i mean, like you, i will just be watching this space.

all right, that's going to do it for me for now. "way too early" with jonathan lemire is up next. and you saw what happened to a highly respected lawyer today, bob costello, wow. i've never seen anything like that. highly respected. but remember this we can't put in an expert witness. we're not allowed to put