firstly, the leninist gelro plan, the state plan for the development of the electric power industry. it formed the basis of stalin's industrialization. golelro - lenin's brainchild. industrialization grew out of the government. secondly, by creating collective farms, stalin implemented lenin’s cooperative plan; it was lenin who outlined more than specific ways, forms and methods of socialist reconstruction. agriculture. thirdly, in one form or another, state planning is now accepted in the most developed capitalist countries for the first time developed by stalin in the soviet union. when liberals and monarchists endlessly tell us that in china and in all other socialist countries there is no socialism, because there is a market, with the same success, we can answer that in the usa or japan there is no capitalism, because the market there is regulated. and state planning,

especially in moments of crisis, puts pressure on any market instruments, which are immediately hidden in a closet under lock and key. but it was lenin who scientifically substantiated the need for a planned economy; in february 1921 lenin signed he also developed a decree on the creation of a central planning body, the state planning committee, and from there the planned economy grew, including stalin’s. fourthly. the creation of the red army , which subsequently broke the back of fascism, is the unconditional merit of lenin, although not only him, but it was lenin who gave a scientific basis for the military doctrine of the young soviet state, did a colossal job of summarizing the experience of wars and vastania, having studied about 200 books on the history of military art. the army created by lenin and his comrades did the unthinkable then, she destroyed ukrainian separatism, and

... also defeated almost all other caucasian, transcaucasian, asian , siberian, far eastern separatisms, defeating, in addition, kolchak, miller, denikin, in rangel, and driving out all kinds of white guard allies who were passionately engaged in plunder russia. fifthly, the unprecedented fruits that soviet culture gave in the late thirties, when the country entered the most terrible war, having world... level cinema, theater, painting, literature, symphonic music and mass song were fully laid down by lenin; already at the very beginning of the twenties, moscow, the capital of the young state, which had just emerged from a terrible and destructive civil war, was overcrowded with dormitories, where students from among the proletarian and peasant youth who received scholarships began to study essentially... sciences, all types of art, and what

they learned surprised the whole world. and world-class counterintelligence, which was created by the early twenties, worked brilliantly, carrying out, by the way, physical destruction enemies of soviet power outside the country, long before such stalinist practices. and the last thing for today, it was lenin who launched anti-colonial processes around the world that... brought down almost all the major empires, including the ottoman, french, italian, british, and so on. lenin started these processes, stalin continued them, they subsequently gave results, what are they? yes, the most basic ones that we are reaping today, all those countries that recently gathered for african and latin american summits, they are the creation of the soviet project and its anti-colonial policy, launched in the year,

which, i emphasize, they themselves remember very well, remember and value very well, counting precisely from this date, 1917, their national freedom. we have historically defended our borders, our people and those who need our help. although our enemies spoke different languages ​​and had different weapons, the goals were always the same: to destroy the country, to take away our freedom. but we have always bravely and steadfastly resisted in battle, history remembers everything. strength helped us win unity of the people, courage of the troops. become a hero bringing victory closer. serve under contract.

stark robbers, what a shame, the court arrested a pensioner who, along with but everything did not go according to plan, i immediately realized that it was the scammer who said urgently, stop all contacts altogether, i’ll come right away, she answered me that she was cooperating with the investigative committee and the central bank , we are catching scammers here, just like the scammers from square zombie our pensioners over the phone, help me, my life is in danger, and what must i say? to the subscriber with an accent, so that... your money and your mind, what's your mother's name? i forgot the word, but surname, patronymic, you better look for money and don’t ask unnecessary questions, telephone racket in the author’s project of andrei kunitsin, a person has the right, tomorrow at 16:20 on ntv, now for

ease of understanding, let’s go through the thesis, which is more often everything is used by people who want to exalt stalin by belittling lenin. first: lenin wanted a world revolution, and stalin began to build a red empire. the thesis about building socialism in a single country is lenin's thesis. stalin, like lenin , strictly speaking, did not build any empires, but consistently built a very large state of workers and peasants, however , the thesis that the first socialist state in the world needs the largest possible territories is also lenin’s thesis, and even pre-revolutionary, in lenin’s famous article of the year 14 about the national pride of the great russians, to which lenin’s opponents often refer, says this

in plain text. first lenin says: is the great russian conscious proletarian alien to us? there is, of course, no feeling of national pride, we love our language, our homeland. then lenin says: we are full of a sense of national pride, which is why we especially hate our slave present, when the same landowners, incited by the capitalists , are leading us to war, to strangle poland and ukraine, to crush the democratic movements in persia and china in this place our opponents are starting to shout, you see, already in 1914 he wanted to give freedom to ukraine and poland, no, persia and china mentioned by lenin give his statement a completely different sound, now we will explain what it is. launching the movement of great anti-colonial processes, lenin, in fact, simply could not, as a sober politician, say, let's liberate china, help persia, as well as the peoples of africa,

latin america, and so on and so forth, but about those who are somehow held in tsarist russia itself is in control, gloomily keep silent, you say to us about here we oppress whoever we want, this is not your chinese or african business, the meaning of lenin’s proposals was extremely simple, to support the right of ukrainians to read language, their own theater, to their own periodicals, but not at all for the department, about which lenin does not write anything there for a moment; on the contrary, in the same article he clearly, with attention, articulates the following: we are not at all... equal conditions for centralization and against the petty-bourgeois ideal of federal relations, then there is one more time , the revolution has not happened yet, but lenin already unambiguously reported in 1914:

we will give you the right to language and culture, but you will live in a centralized state, all these petty-bourgeois, separatist ideals of yours... are with you, so he said lenin, re-read sober eyes, finally. he did what he promised in 1914 with ukraine, driving it by 1920 into a centralized state, completely subordinate to moscow. he would have done exactly the same with poland, of which there is direct evidence, namely the transcript of the meeting, where lenin directly insists on the capture of warsaw and the return of poland to the rule of moscow. it’s a pity, lenin’s plans were ruined by the military defeat of tukhachevsky, who was advancing on warsaw. in addition to the polish soviet republic, lenin also intended to annex persia, initiating a campaign against iran. let's follow further, they say, i have already read it a thousand times on social networks with and without reason.

lenin divided the country into republics, but stalin was against it. but we read stalin’s interview with the newspaper pravda dated november 18, 1922. answer to the question about the form of association. i quote: the nature of the unification should be voluntary, exclusively voluntary, with each national republic having the right to secede from the village. end of quote: this is what stalin said in 1922. to stop repeating this argument, we need to remember for a moment, that stalin had absolute power from a certain time. if he had been against lenin’s norms of community life, he certainly could have abolished them, and not created the baltic republics and the kazakh ussr. that is, he might not have been doing exactly the same thing as lenin, but for some reason, this is exactly what he was doing? well, why bother then? with this, stalin was against it, stalin was against it, and then he forgot that he was against it.

here, here's something else that's important to remember to understand. nowadays they often repeat that there was no need to create any republics, they should have left them russian provinces as princes. even now this is perceived, you know, as a bit outlandish, but then it would inevitably have been perceived as unter-preshebeevism, as bestiality and chauvinism, whatever you want, dirty people, but no one from our free country. has no right to marry for anything, live in russian provinces and don’t rock the boat, but the processes of national liberation had already matured all over the planet, republics were already being created in europe at breakneck speed, the peoples of russia, they too, you know, weren’t sitting in a gloomy basement, they were aware, so were they they wanted to live with a sense of national dignity, why the hell are you denying them this, what kind of rhetoric is this anyway, what are you talking about? fish owners , just imagine for a minute that today the usa , or turkey, or anyone else, will make

a similar statement that no one dares to move, whoever is under their protectorate, no matter how you look at it, it’s not for you you’ll like it when georgia also talks about the abkhazian and ossetian peoples, that they should be georgian provinces, do you think it’s nice or, on the contrary, disgusting, well the people of russia would then have found it just as vile and humiliating; they couldn’t believe it. but they also had the right to vote. lenin set the bar as high as possible, to build a statehood where it would be profitable to live, and not to put entire nations on chains. but nowadays no one wants to take these essentially banal things into account. but stalin accepted them, he understood this, consciously, consistently, that before the lenin bomb it was high time to rename it lenin cement. when, let me remind you, the soviet union wanted dissolve. the overwhelming majority of the country's population opposed the dissolution of the soviet

union. the so-called lenin bomb did not explode. then yeltsin simply kicked out the lenin and stalin republics from our common home. go ahead. third: lenin professed internationalism, and stalin made a rightful russian turn on the eve of the patriotic war. internationalism is, in fact, ultimately just friendship. peoples, this is the ability to get along with neighbors, the ability to be in solidarity with the workers of other countries, because if the workers of the whole world do not are in solidarity with each other, then in resolving their financial, unprincipled, immoral issues the money bags become in solidarity, so stop scaring people with this terrible word internationalism, financial globalism turned out to be much more terrible, as for lenin and stalin, they both professed internationalism, but most in fact, the right russian turn was first made back in 1920, when

the soviet-polish war began, in the soviet press they began to directly appeal to the great russian spirit, calling to remember the previous the victory of russian weapons, this is what, among other things, brought a huge number of former tsarist officers into the ranks of the red army. the russian theme already existed quite legally in lenin’s years and even competed with the proletarian international theme. the russian right-wing patriotic literary party existed and under lenin had the strongest positions, these are valery bryusov and alexander blok, poets of the yesenin circle and sergei yesenin himself, this is the krasnaya nov magazine, this is alexey, who began to collaborate with the soviet authorities, and then returned to soviet russia nikolaevich tolstoy. as for the extreme left, lenin kept his distance from them; for him, even mayakovsky was too radical, too excessively leftist. lenin looked at the militant lebanese proletarian literature with

amazement, to put it mildly. we follow further: the fourth statement lenin gathered a gang of russophobes, and stalin destroyed the entire leninist guard. in fact, lenin did not and could not have had any guards, but if we use this not very successful phrase, we should remember this: stalin, derzhinsky, podvoisky, kalinin, bonchebruevich brothers, lunacharsky. and even voroshilov and molotov , this is the leninist guard, lenin himself, in fact, identified stalin as his successor, public trials of yesterday’s comrades-in-arms, islamists, and so on, these are not stalin’s, but lenin’s, inherited by stalin’s know-how, it was lenin who tirelessly fought either with the left or with the right excesses, and stalin continued this struggle, using approximately the same phraseology, not to mention the fact that stalin’s purges, for example, in the nkvd or in the work of the christian red army, for the most part affected not lenin’s, but

just stalin’s own nominees , he nominated them, he cleared them out, and frenovsky, perhaps, the lenin guard, the creators of the gulag, or something, the lenin guard, lenin didn’t even know these names , as for trotsky, zinoviev, kamenev, consider them among the leninist guard, bearing in mind lenin’s fierce conflicts with all of the above, it is at least debatable, for the first time, by the way, it was not zenoviev and kamenev who demanded to be expelled from the party stalin, and lenin in 1917, stalin then rather took a conciliatory position, fifth: lenin fought against great russian chauvinism, hated russians, and stalin turned his ideology towards russian sovereignty. both lenin and stalin, creating a huge centralized state, at the rhetorical level, trampled on great russian chauvinism, and, while having one elementary goal, they had to lure

hundreds of spreading nations into the country. there was no time for expensive and difficult persuasion, therefore, the simplest thesis has been put forward: we will no longer allow the black hundreds, great russian chauvinists and xenophobes of all stripes to humiliate your peoples, in our soviet state everyone will be equal, there was no time for long and complex persuasion, hundreds of nations responded , they believed if lenin and stalin were short-sighted politicians, or, say, ancient jews, obsessed with the idea of ​​a monoethnic state, where all other nationalities should know their place, since these peoples, unlike the russians, are backward minorities, the soviet leaders would have received ryazan, tula and vladimir regions in control, and not one sixth of the planet, nevertheless, it should be remembered that under lenin the ideologists of pochvennichestvo and red imperialism, including national bolshevism, as we have already mentioned,

lived, wrote, published, under lenin in the home library contained collections of the poet... nikolai klyuev and other main peasant russophile poets, their books were published one after another in lenin’s russia. alas, it was under stalin that this entire generation was physically exterminated. poets klyuev, klychkov sergey, peter oreshin and so on, the ideologist of national bolshevism nikolai ostrialov, they were all shot. did lenin teach this to stalin is an open question? of course not. however, to the question: did stalin give personal orders to repress klyuyevo klychkov. or ustraalovo, we will also answer in the negative, no, i didn’t give it away, and you ’re talking about lenin here, there are much more interesting topics for discussion in the context of the fight against great russian chauvinism. in russia today , national autonomies and republics are almost as dense as under lenin. don't want to discuss this in equally merciless terms , put it to the attention of the current president, as

you put it to lenin, that it’s time to resettle the national princes, along with their principalities and their peoples, from the republics: to what you call ordinary russian provinces, no, you won’t say that today to the servants , ah-ah, strange , it turns out that your adherence to principles has visible limits and is not directed to the future, to the past, further, sixth, lenin ukrainized the russian population, the little russian province, and stalin disentangled the problem. yes, indeed, a number conscious processes began already in lenin’s times, affected by the inertia of the civil war, the promise to ukrainian comrades to forget about the ukrainian question, however, full-scale planned state ukrainization started in 1927 after lenin’s death. however, by 1932 it became clear that this process was bringing harmful results, ukrainization began to be frozen, and in 1937-38 the most zealous ukranizers were

physically eliminated. that is, in fact, he forcibly ukrainized the population of the ukrainian soviet republics, not so much lenin as stalin, but stalin also stopped this process as a whole. let's stop there for now. this list can be continued, but the essence is clear. if you want to tell the truth, tell the whole truth. but with this, lenin ruined everything, and stalin fixed everything, you need to go to a comics factory for simple readers who, with their lack of knowledge, want to reinforce your lack of professional conscience. finally, let me remind you that stalin himself spoke about lenin. i will quote stalin's speech of 1937. 13 years have passed since the death lenin, and what great years we are. there is already a full-fledged cult of stalin in the country and he could no longer exalt his teacher in such an obvious way, but no, stalin

says: the people must demand from their deputies that they be the same, clear and definite, meaning in their thinking, like lenin, this is point one, point two, so that they are as fearless in battle and merciless towards enemies as lenin, says stalin, point three: so that they are free from any panic, from any semblance panic when things start to get complicated, just as lenin was free, so stalin said. stalin, let us recall, saw what restraint lenin showed in 1918-19-20, when more than once it seemed that the soviet republic had 2-3 days left to live, with what calmness lenin made decisions and did not allow his comrades to lose heart. it was this experience that i turned to with confidence. stalin in the terrible days of june 22, 23, 24 , forty-one, in those days when the germans were near moscow, point four, we quote stalin,

so that they, the chosen ones of the people, would also be wise and unhurried when solving complex issues where a comprehensive orientation is needed , a comprehensive consideration of all the pros and cons , as lenin was, point five, listen carefully to what stalin said, so that the people’s representatives love their people as much as lenin loved them, this is exactly what , something to remember when someone in your presence tries to contrast lenin and stalin. however, let’s add one more thing: stalin, as we know, had a spiritual education and probably knew what was said in the holy scriptures, i quote, because you should be the same feelings as in jesus christ, or in the modern russian translation, let your thoughts and feelings be the same as those of jesus christ. and stalin... lenin appealed confidently to this phrase: and if you find blasphemy in this, then this is a complaint against stalin, of course, as i think, he was simply secretly confident that he and his

teacher had an exorbitant, great goal , therefore, he enlisted lenin’s support, continuing his path, and directly demanded the same from his comrades, to read lenin, to learn from lenin, to be consistent and unbending, like lenin, it’s not me who says this, it’s stalin. i said so, i remember, i was once sitting in the company of a social philosopher, whom you most likely know, and one great russian director, whom you know for sure, and we started talking about this, about the attempt to contrast stalin and lenin in our days, and here was this phrase “stalin is lenin 20 years later” was not uttered by me. and of course, i generally agreed with my interlocutors, they are older than me, smarter than me, huh. elders must be listened to.

hello everyone, this is a dacha answer, i’m ilya zapadenet. today we will be reassembling the kitchen and living room. now there is a feeling that this interior designer was assembled without instructions. the table is on the heel of the sofa, next to the door to the bathroom, two walls of windows, and it seems that there is only enough space here for furniture. we will add both logic and functionality to the space. and most importantly, the atmosphere of an eternal, carefree warm summer will appear here. masya is eager to fight, let me, let me play. let's get serious, weekend holidays for the original sarafanov family they usually go like this, sportily, cheerfully and loudly. alexey andreevich is 80 this year

, come on, stop laughing, whether we play or not , we play, we have no time for jokes here, but the children still have to try to beat back his serves, the children also do spins, he himself did everything, boxing , handball, cross-country skiing, and the children turned out to be athletic, everyone loves to spend time actively. on weekdays, when the younger ones go to work or study, albina timoevna and alexey andreevich are not bored. there are flower beds in the yard and fruit trees and a greenhouse with different varieties of cucumbers. and look down there again, do you see it to the right? no, i don’t see it, this one. yes. they have been together for 51 years, and their paths crossed on the railroad. i worked as a station attendant, and he was a driver and even... a year later we had a wedding, two daughters were born in the marriage

, katya and sveta, we had nine huge huge birch trees, this was our plot, we picked mushrooms here for the first year, first we built a temporary hut, now in its place there is a summer kitchen and a bathhouse, and this one is two-story adults helped parents rebuild their house children and son-in-law, we say we did this with our own hands, we bought shields, sanded them into the top layer to get such a relief structure, when he was at the exhibition, he saw how wood was built, he really liked this process and he became interested and decided to make here are the cabinet panels. they made two bathrooms, one on the second floor in the form of a telephone booth. the door was without these jumpers, they glued it to the glass themselves, i also wanted to write the phone number there, but somehow i didn’t get around to it, let’s hang this picture here, maybe it seems to me that it will look good in a frame, good, ekaterina is a product specialist, she worked in textiles and clothing for many years, and at home the main family designer,

sergei, is her husband. mechanical engineer , construction foreman at the dacha , look at everything here more carefully, their son artyom is a student, studying to become a design engineer, eighteen-year-old varia fulfilled her mother’s once unrealized dream, this year she entered the faculty of architecture, somewhere probably in the eighth grade i said that i would finish art and never use a pencil again i won’t take it in my hands, i deceived, so in my opinion it’s normal, no worries, now it will be beautiful, just like my older sister graduated from plikhanovka, works in show business, organizes concerts, at the dacha acts as ekaterina’s chef, so you’ll finish it with us then do you need currants or smaller ones? no, in half, so that it’s nice , while i’m preparing the egg, you will, no , you won’t, well, whatever you want, the aroma of home- baked goods attracts the whole family like a magnet, but here you have to jostle, well, you

always have such a bustle here in cramped conditions it turns out, right? well, yes, as you can see , there are not enough places for seven, after all, when we were little, there seemed to be nothing, but when we grew up, friends come periodically, usually 25-30 people gather here and when in this living room, here , when everyone comes here, there just turns out to be a huge bunch of people, like in a club, roughly speaking, somehow you gather at one common table, rarely, rarely we usually push it here a little, because here it ’s already quite it’s a bit cramped to sit here, i feel like i’ve found a place for myself - this is cat, that’s who doesn’t need a makeover , it’s the cat, in the living room, how do you spend time here, watching tv, half the people are sitting here, someone is sitting at the table, and there’s also a big fireplace, how often do you use it, in winter almost everyone day, it’s like the heating works here, and how warm it is here in winter in general, it blows coldly from under the floor, 16° you can’t rise here anymore, 16° in winter, and you

two are left here alone. of course, fresh air, well, i would like it to be more comfortable, probably, yes, of course, of course, the door to the bathroom, next to your kitchen, how convenient it is, is generally inconvenient, you have to go to the second floor, especially when guests arrive, many are very uncomfortable, but in our dreams, the designers will remove this bath somewhere, maybe change places, somehow they will be able , but this is how it is, the wildest with the wildest dreams, it would probably be cool to make floor-to-ceiling windows, yeah. there’s probably even some kind of exit to the street, to go out you have to go through three doors, but i would like to go out in the morning with a cup of coffee in slippers, in general it’s all clear to the problems, that ’s what you want to feel here, we wouldn’t want everything bright, some kind of classic and some kind of modern classic, yes, what is modern classic for you, simple colors, but some kind there is simple furniture, monochromatic, maybe there, without patterns, we don’t like them, we don’t like whitewashed furniture, in my opinion, everything in carpets is to

the desired extent. i want something more modern, i know for many it ’s alarming, after all, giving up your home, where you live all year round, of course, but be we are sure that we will offer you something that will surprise you, that’s good, that’s good, that’s super, we hope, so i’ll accompany you, go ahead, yes, we are like wise men with gifts. let's look for a pattern, you are our magi, what does the salad have to do with it, what is it? this, this is a horse, a carved horse , yes, handmade, alexey, and practically a boat, fresh salad, summer greens, yes, it charges with energy and vitamins, and we will definitely use this color in the interior, it will appear on our wall . will everything be so energetic in this room? no, we will definitely balance other colors, companions, so that.