tv Segodnya NTV March 13, 2024 10:00am-10:36am MSK
10:01 am
completely fits into the budget rules, in fact they are quite conservative in nature, because some experts believe that there should be more income, which means that larger expenses would need to be planned, because this should directly affect... excuse me, prospects development of the economy, well, in general , correct, but in 1918 we additionally planned to allocate 8 trillion to the development of the economy and the social sphere, and then increased these expenses, i think it is quite likely if everything turns out as optimists from...
10:02 am
this environment, which i mentioned, experts say, then we can and should be able to increase these expenses in various areas, that is, we are talking about a six-year period, that’s exactly what we’re talking about about the six-year period, we are now increasing the budget for a three-year period, for a three-year, as we say, planned period, but of course we and... everything, when we were preparing for the message, i say, we were preparing for the message, because the whole team is working, we proceeded from the assumption that we would calculate our income and expenses in those areas that we consider key, priority for 6 years, but still there are literally stunning projects, for example, the sochi dzhubaga highway, 130 km,
10:04 am
there are, then in this, in this small space, there may, may arise traffic jams, of which there are now enough, in general, we will determine this with specialists, how, in what stages, but it needs to be done, it is necessary to determine, of course, the final cost of the project , to ensure that everyone remains within the framework of these financial plans, well, first just the interests of the people. but also the economy,
10:05 am
10:08 am
10:09 am
means that we must increase the innovative start of the economy, well let's say increase robotization density, today we have 10 robots. we have entire areas designated, including engineering training, well, you probably noticed that we now have 30 of these modern engineering schools across the country, we have already launched, this year we are launching 20 more and there will be 50 and we are planning 50 more in the coming years,
10:10 am
therefore, in these directions, this is the future of our country, we will move and develop in these directions, well, to put an end to the sanctions, and many people express the idea: there is no point in this, no necessity, we simply analyze, and the government, the central bank, the security council, we analyze everything that our enemies do, much is done not even for political or military reasons, although this is argued for, but is done simply for reasons of competition, unfair competition , hiding behind some political or military considerations. this happened in the aircraft industry, this happens in many other industries, well, we
10:11 am
live in the world that exists, and we are going to it we have adapted, we understand who we are dealing with, and so far, this can be seen from the results of our work, we are acting quite effectively, but the insidiousness of the west does not end with sanctions, here is a direct quote from your address to... the west is trying to drag us into a new arms race , in order to exhaust them, to repeat the trick that they succeeded in the eighties of the ussr, like here, how great a margin of safety we have here, in the conditions of the arms race, in fact, here it is necessary that for each, for each ruble invested in the defense industry, we get the maximum return, indeed, during the times of the ussr , no one counted these ... expenses, no one , unfortunately, was chasing efficiency,
10:12 am
defense expenses amounted to about 13% of the gdp of the country of the soviet union, but i will not refer to our statistics, we will refer to stockholm institute, last year our defense spending was 4%, this year it is 6.8%, that is, we have grown by 2.8%. in principle, this... this is a noticeable increase, but absolutely not critical, well, in the soviet union it was 13%, and now we are 6.8, so, i must say that defense spending, they, they accelerate the economy, they make it more energetic, but here, of course, there are limitations, we understand this, here is the eternal question of what is more profitable, guns or oil, we
10:13 am
mean this, although i repeat, modern even our defense industry is good because it not only indirectly influences the civilian industry, but by using the innovations needed for defense, it uses these innovations to produce civilian products. this is an extremely important thing, but - firstly, we have expenses of course, they are not comparable, how many are in the states , they are 800, under 900 billion already, yes already under 900, well, 860 there are 870 billion yes, this is absolutely incomparable with our expenses, it just seems to me that they are sawing up there, because they don’t have hypersound, no, i’m not right now, i ’ll explain what’s the matter now, the fact is that they have a lot of money. they go for maintenance - and not only for wages, but for
10:14 am
maintenance, for the maintenance of bases all over the world, and there everything goes like into a black hole, you can’t count anything there, that’s where the main one goes cut, although - and in the production of weapons of destruction, weapons in general , money is also spent there that is difficult, difficult to estimate, if you do the math: and we essentially nullified everything they did, everything they invested in this system
10:15 am
, this is how we need to act, and of course, without any doubt, the very economy of our armed forces, it must meet today’s requirements, vladimirovich, the word justice is a magic word for the russian language, you use it very carefully, and that’s all well... one day you said this word in your message and it sounded like lightning, you said that. the distribution of tax time should become more equitable in russia and suggested that the government think about what direction to think in? well, you know, the actual distribution of this tax time, it should have been fair in the sense that it went to the general treasury, as
10:17 am
10:18 am
survive if you win? well, we still need to talk about this after the elections, after the votes are counted, it seems to me that now... it’s incorrect, but in general the government is working, as we see, the results are obvious, these are objective data, it’s working quite satisfactorily, you mentioned, reduction of tax time for large families, children in general and the demographic situation, these topics... are very voluminous in your address, indeed the issue is quite painful, because demographically russia is melting, and last year became an anti-record year in terms of birth rates, and as you know, now there is one percent of the birth rate, one 1.31 there are
10:19 am
10:20 am
to spend, well, through various channels, up to 14 trillion rubles, this is a lot of money, and... and areas of support for families with children, there are a lot of them , starting with general social construction or renovation of kindergartens, construction of new schools, renovation of new schools, renovation of old schools in order in accordance with the requirements of today, support for women from pregnancy to 17 years of age for a child, because we have almost 400,000 women now receiving benefits - this is almost every third woman who is expecting a child, and more than 10 million children receive benefits, this is such a serious, serious thing, we continued. continued - the system for issuing maternity capital collateral, we continued payments,
10:21 am
well, now we are making decisions of 450 thousand rubles per family, if a third child appears in order to repay the mortgage loan, we have retained mortgage loan benefits for - for families with children, in general there is a whole set in very different areas in order to support families, and of course, you have already mentioned this, this is the fight against poverty, because, of course, of course, it is much more difficult for families with children than for families without children, this is understandable, the expenses there are high, but still less, still for this reason we have managed to do a lot in this direction. look, here, and if you look at 20 years ago, our poverty line was,
10:22 am
in my opinion, 20, 29% of the population, that’s 42 million people, now 9.3 is according to the latest percentage data. but this is also 13.5 million people , of course, a lot, of course, everything needs to be done to reduce it to at least 7%, and for large families there is a more modest figure, but it should also be increased, but what are we from? we proceed when we talk about problems with fertility, well, i have already said it many times, and experts say this, these are objective things, we have had two very large declines in the birth rate. during the great patriotic war 43-4, a comparable decline occurred immediately after the collapse of the soviet union, just one to one, the same decline
10:23 am
in the birth rate, it is clear why the social support system collapsed, no matter how weak it was in the ussr, if we can talk about it , but still she was, and after the collapse of the soviet union, she also disappeared almost completely, well there... the count began to be full, well, what can i say, now it’s not even there necessity, in any case , the horizon for family planning in these years decreased and the birth rate fell to before the war, before the war years, then we had an upswing and now we have a fairly large number of children, young people who in a few years will enter adulthood in childbearing age, and we very much believe that our indicators will increase, what you said is a global trend, there are only a few countries, such as those with developed economies, that show positive
10:24 am
demographic dynamics, in all other countries everything is going negative, this is a complex problem related to the economy, to the life priorities of women, now it’s better not to get involved, let the demographers do it. they try and tell us, suggest solutions to us, but you know what still puts us in a positive mood, the mood in society, in our country 70% of men and 72% of women want to have two or more children, yes, and the state should support them, this is a whole big set, a set of support measures that we are planning, they are mandatory... we need to implement it and we we’ll do it, but still, vich, that is, there is no confidence that these measures will turn the situation around yet,
10:25 am
in the late nineties, and this is a well-known story, you yourself talked about it, you saved your children from a fire, literally entered a burning house, to the second floor. and then, uh, they already remembered that there was also money there somewhere, well, the money burned in the fire, this speaks of your priorities, first children, then money, maybe now on a national scale it’s not a piece of cake 14 , and then straight to everything, create a program like this, to be sure to turn this situation around , you know, it is necessary... look at the course of events, as they say, at the beginning of 2000 we took a number of steps in the field of demography, including the introduction of maternity
10:28 am
if we talk about migrant workers, we don’t have so many, compared to other countries, they make up 3.7% of the total number of workers, but they are concentrated in those regions where economic life is more active, and there are of course an order of magnitude more of them, this moscow region, moscow, northwestern region, some regions of the north, where the level of wages is.
10:29 am
i am introducing even greater results into modern technology, but for this we need to invest in this area and train personnel, well, we are already talking about this too, this is the most important thing that we need to think about, well, in general, of course, migration politics is an important tool in the economy, it’s not a sin to look at the experience of other countries, first of all, of course, we need to
10:30 am
talk about the repatriation of our... compatriots, what repatriation is and what compatriots are is already reflected in our regulatory framework, there is no need to repeat here, here we need to talk about attracting people who may not be planning to move to the russian federation, but due to their qualifications, due to their talents in various fields various spheres, can make a significant contribution to the development of our state, in various ways to the development of russia, we will also be happy to accept such people. attract, and, as regards traditional labor migrants, here we also need to think about how to prepare them for coming to russia, including with our partners in the countries where they live, this means studying the russian language, our traditions, culture and so on, it is necessary so that about them they were cared for here , treated as human beings, so that they integrated into our society in a natural way, so... all this together
10:31 am
10:32 am
probably in this direction too, well, of course, the population density there in these regions has always been quite high, well, the climate is wonderful, as for donbass, it is an industrially developed region, back in the days of the soviet union, how much did the soviet union invest in this region , to its coal mining and metallurgical industries. everything there is at a high level, yes, of course , investments are required there so that everything is modern, this is production, living conditions, working conditions of people are
10:33 am
built in a completely different way, not the way it was a few decades ago; as for novorussia, it is a distinct region with a clearly developed agriculture . here we will do everything to support traditional areas of activity, and new ones that organically fit into these regions, into the desire of people to develop them, and you know how people there are very talented people, moreover, i have already said, even taxes from the federal budget already come from there, but they need it at this stage help, help, support, bring to the common. historically, it is absolutely clear that
10:34 am
the nazi regimes do not dissolve themselves, but disappear as a result of military defeat, this was the case in germany, italy, and japan. the same thing will obviously happen with the bandera national regime and we are now advancing along the entire front line, judging by the message of our military correspondents from the ministry of defense, have we managed to find a way to fight when during the offensive our losses... are less than in defense, that is, this is a rather non-trivial task for military art, but it always holds back the offensive, this is frugality, completely
10:35 am
justified in relation to our hero warriors, but this question arises, how to advance with minimal losses? the question is clear and fair, but the answer is also simple. it is necessary to increase the means of destruction, the number and power of means of destruction, to increase the effectiveness of the forces used, aviation, both tactical and army, also strategic, well, keeping in mind, of course, in those components that are acceptable for armed conflicts this kind of weapons are ground- based weapons. including high-precision weapons, this is artillery, armored vehicles, our development is proceeding without any exaggeration, by leaps and bounds, in this direction, yes, this is what is happening.
15 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
NTV Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on