"there's no reason for iran to be scrutinized like this. all our sites are under the agency's watch. which country in the world is monitored to this extent? is israel, the protagonist and producer of these allegations and accusations against the islamic republic of iran a party to the treaty? have they signed the treaty? have they accepted the mpt? no, they haven't. does israel even allow the agency to inspect its nuclear facilities? which one of these countries?" does the agency inspect, why is so much pressure on us? these are purely political, there's nothing else. it's a political tool. our nuclear facilities based on the nuclear facilities profile, statistically represent about 2 to 3% of the global nuclear facilities capacity. the amount of inspections in iran constitutes 25% of the world's total inspections. we represent 2 to 3% are inspected 25. 5%, 10 times more than

others. we have inspectors coming every day. the agency visits us every day, enters our facilities. what have they found? which site has iran not declared? which program hasn't iran declared? these accusations repeated for 25 years. why were the jcpo negotiations hel? why was the jcpo established to put an end to these accusations? acpo ended these accusations under the pmd. the resolution of accusations thrown against iran as a result of the jcpoa is the result of interactions and actions taken by the islamic republic with good will. now they're going back trying to unearth matters closed under the pmd and put them back on the table. then what's goodwill for, if this isn't political. in the same briefing session for the western board of governors. this was real, it's

interesting, and the documentation exists. in the briefing held for the director general's report, the deputy director general explained that countries are questioning why they're reopening discussions from the previous session. they asked, didn't you close this issue? why are you bringing it up again? in response, he said, we agreed not to agree, so no matter how much evidence we provide, they keep saying we agreed not to agree. therefore, it's apparent that this is political, from all conditions, reports and articles, it screams that this is a political move. i believe this political path, this destructive path, will never affect the iranian people, the iranian administration or the iranian nation, because this path is for the advancement of society, for the advancement of nation. nuclear technology is a groundbreaking technology, accelerator. read mr. bill gates's speech.