on friday march 1st, millions of iranian people went to the polls to select 290 law makers from among over 15,000 candidates. the poll was twinned with vote for 88 members of the assembly of experts, body task with choosing and supervising the leader of the islamic revolution. the polls closed at midnight on friday 6 hours later than planned due to second surge of people who decided to cast their votes in the evening. at the same time, more than 350 foreign reporters from over 20 countries were present in iran to cover the news of the country's national elections. the twin elections were held smoothly on one single day with the least possible problems. despite all the... efforts put in to show the

democratic event as a thorny problem for the iranian political system. the parliament is iran's national legislator and its members are responsible for drafting legislation approving the annual budget or any international treaties and agreements among of other things. the new elected members will convene in late may as law makers are expected to direct the country toward better future by laws they pass, amend and change. this is mr. hamid reza taraqi. if the parliament does its

supervisory role and makes sure that the laws are being implemented, many of the current problems will vanish, because the solutions have already been developed and adopted as laws. the important thing is to enforce them. if the next parliament focuses more on upholding the existing laws, majority of the current problems will be solved. indexes are indicating an improving situation. the world bank's figures and statistics also confirm of this claim. i think that many of the current problems will be solved in the next two years. initial results are indicative of rather new configuration in the islamic consultative assembly or iran's parliament. with votes tallied manually, iran's ballot takes time to count. as of producing this

episode, official preliminary results from tehran indicated that mahmoud nabaviyan and hamid rasy, two principales had topped the list of 30 representatives, followed by 35 year old state television host turned first time law maker amir hoseyn sabeti. speaker mohammed baqir khalibaf finished fourth and only a handful of his sponsort candidates ascended. longtime law maker mujtaba zonor grabbed seat in the holy.

well the principalist assembled various lists of candidates and on the other hand the reformis didn't have serious participation in the elections. based on the initial results, the majority of successful candidates are, let's say, ultra revolutionary, critical of the current parliament and its speaker dr. gholibov. regardless of the results, it was a political competition and we all have to respect the results. as for the assembly of experts, president ibrahim raisi renewed his place for a third time, securing more than 82% of the vote in the south khurasan province located in eastern iran. on the other hand, sadiq amoli larijani, current head of the top arbitration body known as the expediency council, was perhaps the most of notable figure who failed to grab seat in the assembly. the official turnout in the iranian parliament. and the assembly of experts

elections is yet to be announced, but preliminary results at the time of recording this episode of iran today suggests that more than 40% of voters went to the polls on march 1st, rejecting the calls from hostile western regimes and their media outlets to boycott the elections. what is your overall assessment of this round of parliamentary elections in iran? این انتخابات در واقع بزرگترین کمپین تحریم انتخابات. smashed the biggest election boycots over the past 45 years against our country. in our estimation, the enemies of the islamic revolution spent millions of dollars in order to discourage people from going to the poles, but their plot backfired and the voter turnout was over 40%, and that was not something the enemies hope to happen. the elections were held

across 5900 voting stations across iran with 6,800 in the province of tehran, which included the capital and several surroundings. until this election, birth certificates had been required as voter identification, this time voters could use their national id numbers or other id documents instead. in fact, according to semi-official reports, 86% of voters in friday's elections cast their ballots using their national id cards, 11% with birth certificates, 3% with driver's licenses and less than 1% with passport.

the voter turnout is nearly 50%. although in tehran it was less than other big cities, the ministery of interior is to announce the exact number. anyway, the political plot hashed by the enemies of the country to undermine the credibility of the elections was foiled in this sense, the turnout was success. comparatively speaking, voter turnout in 2020 was 42.6%, while in 2016 it reached 61.6% and in 2012 it was 63.9%. it means that this time around the turnout rate is almost the same as the last elections. that's why this year saw the biggest election boycott campaign in the last 45 years

orchestrated from abroad. to have better understanding of the voter turnout. we talk to mri, an iranian political analyst. نکته ی وجود داره اینه که elections four years ago, so it is not correct in my opinion to link this level of turnout to the developments that have unfolded in the country over the past two to three years. is this voter turn out desirable? well, in other countries, this level is something acceptable if not desirable, but for the islamic republic of iran, no, "it is not desirable. we should not content ourselves with this turnout rate and need to increase it for the next elections. in the streets of the gaza strip, which was suffocating under wave of profound sadness,

hopes of getting a loaf of bread turned into funeral processions and sorrow. on the morning that followed the dreadful flower massacre, families buried their hungry martered children as arab aircrafts didn't hesitate to replay. the same aerial drop theater, dropping the packages this time inside zionist israeli settlements of the gaza enclave. is there anything more humiliating and denigrating against a genocide stricken and started people? if aid was the real reason behind the shared, then same people who wanted to help should have opened the rafah border, allowing a trucks into gaza and handing them over to international or local entities responsible for distributing them to the starving people. bait in the form of aid in gaza this week on the mideast. there's plenty more to be said, but first a quick media review to give other outlets a chance to get award in. hello

everyone, welcome to the news section of the program. we will go over some news headlines. president hell's election turn out as blow to opponents of iran. iran's president ibrahim raisy has a... appreciated the iranian people for their massive turnout in the friday elections to choose members of parliament as well as the assembly of experts, saying that the turnout was a blow to opponents of the country. you're not right. said in his message that the ill-wishers of the country did all they could to discourage people from voting, but the people's participation filled with faith and hope was a big no to the inhumane front of arrogance and foiled their insincere plan. iranians rebuff electoral boycott calls. before the voting day had even arrived in iran, western media outlets became a watch with reports and analyses predicting that iranians would not turn up at the polling stations this year. tehran times rights, headlines such as iran braces for low election turnouts, iranians expected to shun

elections and low turnout and boycott expected were how the stenographers of politicians in the west decided to speak of iran's march 1st elections, however, none of these renowned media outlets managed to come up with substantial data or polling information to support their claims. iran parliamentary elections likely to go to runoff with 4,000 out of '500 ballot boxes in tehran counted, some of the candidates seem to have to compete in a runoff as there were no clear winners among them, officials say, quoting from governor of tehran province aliza fakhari, iran front page writes, this law says any candidate who wins at least 20% the valid votes can enter parliament in the first round, but if they fail to garner at least 20% of the ballots, they will probably go to second round, over 250'. thousand forces ensure security of elections, official says iranian interior ministry's deputy for

security affairs majid mirahmadi said on friday over 25000 forces have been tased with ensuring the security of elections and guarding the polling sites. deli wr ahmadi said on friday morning that long cues of voters have been formed at many polling stations across the country describing it as major epic. he noted that full security prevails at all pulling. stations thanks to the efforts by the security and intelligence organizations. venezuela congratulates iran on elections commands its people's will. venezuela's foreign minister has congratulated iran and its people on their elections and their dedications to combatting foreign plots. venezuela has congratulated iran in celebration of its elections praising the exercise as a show of democracy. in a post on x, the venezuelan minister of foreign affairs. said the president nicolas maduro and the government of venezuela congratulate the people and the government of the sister

islamic republic of iran for the celebration the democratic exercise carried out in the 12th elections for the consultative assembly or majlis and the sixth elections for the assembly of experts this march 1st 2024 in the iranian territory. thank you for joining us in this section. let's go back to the main narrative. the elections were... slap to those who try to keep the polling booths empty of voters, that is the soren enemies of the iranian nation. on contrary, people came out in large numbers to exercise their voting rights, thorting the plots hatched by troublemongers and nasayers. they left no stone unturned since 2021 to create hopelessness among irenians, but the fact that the turnout matched that of the 2020 parliamentary elections should... say that

the pressure from outside to discourage people was unprecedented this time and they say that the sanctions and economic pressure were also meant to make people discontent before the elections. at the same time, western media outlets cast out on the elections, they tried to say that the elections were meaningless with no. impact on the future of the people. that said, i have to admit that economic problems acted negatively. some people might have lost their faith in the efficiency and efficacy of the parliament as body capable of resolving the economic problems. western media showed open hascility in these elections, not towards the candidates and their policies and not towards the absence of certain candidates, but towards the very elections. even before the votes were cast, they issued premature verdicts with some even predicting less than

10% turnout, and some suggesting that the iranian system was roting. in other words, they weren't seeking to engage in journalism, but were striving to graft a script for iran's elections and then cover it through their distorting lenses. do you think the call for the boycott of elections worked? بیگان دنبال این بودن که با تحریم انتخابات. seeking to undermine the legitimacy of the islamic republic of iran by calling on people to boycott the elections, but people instead said a big no to them each ballot was in fact a bullet shot at this boycott scheme, as for the opposition groups outside the country, they use anything to get funds, by ignoring many facts, they want to offer picture of the country which, although has nothing to do with reality, can appease their paymasters. while there are still some countries in the region who have no idea about election, the

us and its minions are trying to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the islamic republic by baking the question, by linking the turnout rate to whatever they wish. even before the polls opened, they turn the elections a sham, urging people not to vote. at the same time, some western media outlets try to manipulate their audiences by showing few half- empty polling stations out of 60,00s of them across the country. linking turn out with the legitimacy of the entire political system is not only absurd but hypocritical. low or lukewm turnout has been a common phenomenon in other countries, including in the west. over the last two years, such trends have been widely reported in the german, french and british media, especially in the context of elections of secondary importance. but unlike the iranian case, the legitimacy of the german, french and british governments has never been called into question. given the relatively low turnout, do you think that

the ruling system is faced with legitimation crisis? be need to... nationwide protests were held across france, but no one interpreted it as the legitimation crisis of the french political system. there is no logical relationship between these two. you might infer from low turn out that there is for example some sort of discountent in society at the performance of for example, government, but it's just jumping to conclusion if we connect any political or social development to the legitimation crisis. voter turnout is not a fixed stable phenomenon. it fluctuates from time to time and it's not going to be the ultimate criterion for the legitimacy of a ruling system, as no single factor determines voter

turnout, rather a complex mix of individual, social and political factors have influence on it. for example, older, more educated and higher income earning people are generally more likely to vote than younger, less educated people and people with lower incomes. after nearly 40 elections, people may not take elections as serious as before, some might feel that it's okay if they do not go to the polls because there are many other people or because they think there are many other elections in the future that they can take. part in, moreover, unlike some other countries in the world, going to the poles is not obligatory in our country. in other countries, with higher voter turnout, strict rules, regulations and fines may act as a carrot for the people to vote, but we do not agree with this method. we believe that people's political participation should be of

their own valation. you cannot force them to take part in an election if they don't want. years ago, i don't think so. linking voter turn out to the legitimacy of a political system is not just jumping into conclusion, but altering the reality for mischifous purposes. look as for the self-proclaimed champions of democracy such as the us, the uk, france and the like. if you take a look

at their voter turnout, it's usually below 50%, and that's despite. this strict rules, regulations, fines and sometimes punishments, so by their standards we are still in a satisfactory state, although we were better in the early years after the revolution. as a republic we like to have higher voter turnout because we believe it would be to the benefit the country, because for example, it will help us to have the upper hand in the international arena, yet we firmly believe that this political participation be voluntary, unlike some other countries such as turkey, france and the united states. since the victory of the islamic revolution of iran in 1979, 12 parliament. elections have been held in the country, the ruling system has always encouraged the public to go to the polls, to use their rights to vote and their rights to self-determination, and as

long as they do so, the real winners will be the iranian people. مردم دنبال این هستن که رایشون دیده بشه. people want their votes to be seen, they don't just want to go to the polls for its own sake, but they vote so as to be heard. they want their opinions and concerns to be taken into serious considerations, whether through the ballot boxes or other ways. they want their representatives to be accessible and responsible and at the same time adherent to their election promises. while hostile media outlets zeroed in on the turnout rate, which is comparatively on par with the rest of the world, this round of elections was outstanding in some other regards. for example, this time voters identification processes. was done electronically and therefore the voters didn't have to form endless cues. this year the candidates across the country were provided with nearly 200 tv

channels and equal opportunity for the candidates. this was specially suitable for lesser known candidates and those who did not have enough budget for campaigning expenses. also, printing posters, in addition to the unnecessary costts caused a lot of wastage every year. this year, however, it was all avoided with free online and on-air platforms. this time the islamic republic of iran broadcasting, the irib, provided the candidates across the country with nearly 200 channels. this caused the face of the city to remain almost unchanged in the run up to the elections. you could rarely see posters, banners and flyers advertising the candidates. we had to explain this. point to foreign reporters who had come to iran expecting something else. i would like to add that these tv channels and social media platforms were very influential in shaping

public opinion. but that's not all. this year also transparency and election campaigns reached a new high. have we had anything new in this round of parliamentary elections? there were some changes in this round of elections. very consideration, i think the time for the election campaign needs to be extended. many candidates need more than two weeks to introduce themselves to their electorate. this limited time acts to the benefit of more famous candidates. on the other hand, the law transparency enforced this year was about the candidate's campaign budget was a good point for this round. the vetting process i think still needs improvement, although in my opinion, the garden council's contact was much better this year in comparison. to the past, moreover, the elections were held in complete security, ensuring security for 59,000 voting stations is easier set than done, especially in the

middle east, a region threatened by terrorist groups and the western paymasters. could you tell us about some of the positive aspects of this round of elections? the security of the elections was also a priority underlined by the leader of the islamic revolution. while the enemies were luring to undermine the security of the elections, the elections were held the best possible way, despite its extreme difficulty. likewise, the authorities did their best to have fair elections. there was a head-to-head competition among all political groups to enter the decision-making system. i mean, the parliament. generally speaking, i can say that we had clean elections, free of fraud. ballot rigging and smear campaigns. political groups were all allowed to fill their candidates, different list of candidates support this claim. the

results of this year's elections were also of great significance. it was a reminder that no one should take victory for granted, no matter how big, famous or influential they might be. in fair and free election, the result is no way a foregone conclusion. that's all for today, thank you for watching from the whole team, please do join us again same times to see what else is on, you can also follow us on telegram and x, till next time, take care, information about palestine. bounds on social networks, many times without context. they do not allow us to go deeper and understand all

the dimensions of a cat. catastrophe that is dragging on for centuries. daniel hadway, chileian mayor of palestinian origin, opens a window to palestine to understand in depth the present cause of the palestinian people, exploring its history and future prospects. do not miss a window. to palestine.

sheikh talal abdurrahman shirim, a former prisoner in israel regime prisons. dealing with the situation in palestine and talking to someone who understands and knows the zionist regime very well. freedom is priceless and must, the palestinian. detainee suffers two pains: the first pain when his house is rated by the occupations army, the second suffering that the prisoner will endure begins when he is placed in the army troops vehicle. we hope that the blood that was shed in gaza was not in vain, and that they will achieve the freedom and preserve the dignity.

eh, sea se va a terminar de vender este.