in response to the countries and the nations who dare to take their destiny in their own hands to self-government, to self-determination to simply be independent, the imperialist forces and the imperialist countries take different measures. one of the

most perverse measures are the blockades and sanctions, particularly those exercised by the united states, also by western europe, and sometimes even by some international organizations such as the united nations, beware. the main function of these blockades is to try to complicate the life to the inhabitants of the countries. have resulted in immediately take measures that in some cases of course, it doesn't exist, and they very serious issues in nutrition, medicine, and the most essential elements.

that as the great chinese leader and founder of the people's republic of china maus dong said, the reactionaries lift the rock in their hands to such an extent that when they hold it up, it falls off on their own feet, and the sanctions become something negative for those imposed them. with

the highest number of sanctioned companies, individuals and private entities, some have been strengthened to such level as is the democratic people's republic of korea, which has had sanctions since 1950, the republic of cuba, which has had sanctions since 1960, almost total since 1962, and the islamic republic of iran

de

american imperialism are the ones leading it, the people are wise, they persevere on the path of independence of

the fourth and fifth generation war, depending on who brings it up, the modern war which the unipolar world starts is to simply prevent the world from becoming multipolar. in order to prevent the loss of its hajamanic role as a group, the west is increasingly

using all the tools of the fifth generation war, that is diplomacy, politics and above all the media and sanctions, which are the tools of this war. sanctions, they affect 17 countries with specific and selective measures and six countries with general measures. we must note that the type of these actions can be general or targeted at individuals. therefore, total of 23 countries have been targeted by unilateral, illegitimate and illegal sanctions. we are talking about 72% of the world's population and more than 30% of the entire world's gdp. p: i said this to understand the size and a scope of this action. sanctions, on the other hand result from a clear, but unfair desire to win a competition, competing with products and markets. when you ban the export of a country's products and when you have the same

product, you will be the only option for purchase. furthermore, when you prevent a country from using the international transaction withthraw system, things get... more complicated, the effect of this action is not only on your target country, but also on all countries that want to do business with it. this gets even more complicated when you block a country from accessing swift transactions and also block it from using the dollar currency. when a country is sanctioned, the only option left is to buy western goods. with these conditions, the worst keeps its economy in a state of addiction and says that it is the best and biggest economy, but no, the reason is sanctions. as told you, sanctions are not a substitute for war. many times you are told that sanctions are a substitute for war. this is a lie, sanctions are the art of war. this should be clarified, and in the following you

will see their dark goals. entonces claro, y vamos a ver después cuáles son sus objetivos finales, no? así es. las sanciones son parte la guerra, ahora bien, cómo los pueblos, yes, that's right, sanctions are part of the war, now according to the current situation that we are witnessing, the situation has changed, as we know, we see american countries that have stood up for their rights and how the democratic people's republic of korea has strengthened in science and the military sector, etc. and venezuela has... incredible progress in food production and iran has saw the series of issues in the food security sector and has made progress in the scientific and military fields, and also in the case of russia, it seems that the sanctions have had the opposite effect. rusia, no es cierto, pareciera ser que el

efecto fue al revés, no, es decir, hoy día es there a case today that sanctions have been able to achieve the goal of overthrowing a government and... no country in the world that has been overthrown due to western sanctions. when i say western sanctions it is actually implicit meaning that means us sanctions and then the rest of the west also follows these sanctions, but they're not the ones who imposed the sanctions. mean specifically the european union. eu sanctions are ridiculous. for example, it's funny when latin american countries like nicaragua is sanctioned because europe's trade relation. with nicaragua are very small, what does nicaragua lose when sanctioned? what we see

is that the ultimate goal of sanctions is to topple governments. who are these sanctions against? against all governments that do not submit their political sovereignty, resources and political identity to the west, or in fact america. countries that believe that they have the right to choose their own government as well as the right to choose the government's program.

"there is no government that will fall because of this in the future. this is a zero

sum game, and when despite the efforts of america and the west. when the desired result is not achieved, it means america's defeat. sanctions are illegitimate because they have not been declared by any international court or the united nations, which are the only organizations that have the authority to impose sanctions. these sanctions are illegal because they're not announced by the courts." they are announced by the officers of a ministry and they are part of the political actions. these sanctions are unfair because the people being sanctioned have nothing to do with the government that may or may not fall, but the reality is that they hit the governments that do not surrender their political sovereignty and resources to america, governments that do not want to determine their own political line and plays in international confrontations and exchange for not being sanctioned. these countries are immediately considered by the us as enemy

countries, and then the us says that these countries violate human rights or claim that these countries are declared an extraordinary threat to the security of the us. why do they say this despite the fact that it is a country 30,00 kilometers away? they say this, and they make management statements about it so that they later commit the most theft of resources based on these. words, they must have a political justification for their robberies and looting, otherwise the law of america itself will not allow them to do so. the point is that 72% of the world's population is sanctioned by the other 25%. can a system like this continue to work? obviously not. can almost 30% of the gdp be sanctioned, because the one who used to have 60% of the production, and now this figure doesn't even. reach 40% of the world's gross domestic product make such decision. these

are questions that all lawyers and people with knowledge in the world have, but in addition to some of this conversation, there's also the boomerang effect of sanctions. what will happen when some countries are sanctioned? the united states and europe cannot officially sell those products and this causes their products to be stuckpiled. these products. expire for one, because i remind you again, we are talking about 72% of the world's population, so when you know that you can't do business with 72% the world's. population, you can't sell anything to them, you can't buy anything from them, your production will only be for 28% of the world's population, this amount is very, very low, so your economy will have very, very little growth and possibly negative growth, so this is what is officially on paper, while the us has historically shown that it sanctions with one hand and

negotiates with the other, one example is that they announce that they want to impose the... biggest and toughest sanctions in history against russia. now, on the other hand, as a result of this action, the growth of russia's gdp is higher than that of the european union, which said it wanted to finish russia's work. on the other hand, the oil and gas that reaches europe, which they said can no longer come from russia, still comes from russia. it just happens that it goes through other countries, and because of that they charge you more. so you have the same oil as before. just a little less volume and you're paying lot more money for it than before, and you're no longer dependent on one country but three or four, and of course the gas that you are going to get from the us, the us liquified natural gas, the amount is very small and not enough for europe at all, and the price is much more expensive than what russia was giving you, so what is smart

person at the center of the unipool or imperial decision making a parodis would adopt? de cualquier manera a stupid strategy, as you said, fabricio, fortunately, countries have been able industrialize and ensure their own food security and develop in this direction. this is one of the consequences of sanctions, this is

in the period between 1976 and 1986, there were large companies producing textile products and all of their products ended up in the market with the label made in italy y estaban en el mercado con etiqueta made in italia de means that nations have the ability to overcome sanctions and blockades in any way. what experience do you have of dealing with and passing behind sanctions? superarlos, qué experiencias aquí en el desarrollo desde los pueblos para enfrentar y superar estas sanciones? increase and

development of south south relations. south south relations should take the... place of north, today it is much easier to exchange products with any other country than it was 20 years ago. every country can achieve level of production of products and services. the policy of imperialism is stupid because they don't take into account that in the past until about 50 to 20 years ago resources were exchanged with technology and improvements. today the owners of resources no longer need new technologies, because firstly some countries. have very, very advanced technology, and secondly, if the technology doesn't reach them, there are countries that are willing to give the technology, for example china, russia and brazil itself. so what is the threat where the logic of exchange prevails? when you pay the price of my product at the international market, and if you want, you cannot do the exchange, the

idea of you sanctioning me is stupid. you see, they sanctioned the russian oil and gas pipeline to europe. and wanted to prevent russian gas from reaching europe, but what happened was that gas flows from turkey and azerbaijan and then returns here. what did russia do? it used to have a strong trading partner, the european union, and specifically germany and two lines that transported oil and gas quickly and directly. for political reasons, he sold gas a very low price. today it sells this gas a relatively higher price to india. and china and to other countries such as pakistan, countries that did not buy it before, russia started diversifying its customers and the fort has many more customers than

but the dollar is not very decisive, how does this approach affect the possibility of circumventing or neutralizing sanction en la posibilidades? look brother, this is very easy, it's a disaster for america because thanks to the dollar as the only player in international exchange, america was given the ability and... power in international trade to determine who sells what and who buys what and the terms of payment and this way it earns billions of dollars per day per

transaction. this situation is not going to continue now. the dollar will no longer be the only medium of exchange. according to the predictions made, in a 10-year period, the dollar will probably not be the first currency. why? because as always, there's a proverb that says idiots, in addition to being stupid also become blind, when the us tried to sanction russia, it made it impossible for russia to access the dollar market and the russian account was blocked, like what they did with venezuela in the past, most of the countries in the international level have resources abroad, for emergencies, it can happen, now almost all strategic reserves have been in dollars, now there are many countries that say if i ever get into a conflict with america for any reason... america will stop me and take all my reserves from me, no, it is better not to do this, and they are dedollarizing their reserves. there are many countries that

willingly dedollarize their resources gradually without creating a monetary shock, and many more countries are planning to do this. having less dollars means having less demand for dollars. less demand for dollars means less production of dollars. less production of dollars. information about palestine abounds on social networks, many times without context. they do

not allow us to go deeper and understand all the dimensions of a catastrophe that is dragging on for centuries. daniel hardway, chilean mayor of palestinian origin, opens a window to palestine to understand in depth the present cause of the palestinian people, exploring its history and future prospects. do not miss a window to palestine.

well, i think a lack of tech workers is the least of israel's problems right now. look, we're committed to win the war, we're going to win the war regardless of anything, uh, and i think that the when people look at the economics of israel, they want to make sure. first of all, we're secure city and country, so our security is economic element. if hamas thinks that uh, we're going to end this with them, returning to power, they're wrong. the far bigger problem it faces is first of all, it's military challenge and the resistance on every front. in this week's show we'll be highlighting how

zinus weaponization of antisemitis. is beginning to spectacularly backfire. in november last year, one prominent zienist zelot made a prepostous accusation of anti-semitism about a student's mascot on the university challenge tv quiz show, but she was left with a copious quantity of egg on her face after legal action was taken by the student who was targeted. he came up to rostrom and he turned around and said, um, can people stop hissing behind my back? we all looked at each other and what's a point, no one's hissing, certainly we couldn't hear any hissing from where. we were sitting and then the the uh chair of the meeting shut the meeting down and somehow um this hissing that i couldn't here was interpreted as anti-semitic give them pictures of octopus like this lovely hana octopus oscar here yes um and say actually this was used by the nazis and any any representation of the blue octor must be antisemitic except of course the ones which are not anticemitic.

الله من فضله ويستبشرون، ويستبشرون، ويستبشرون بالذين، ويستبشرون بالذين لم يلحقوا بهم من خلفهم، الا خوف عليهم ولا هم يحزنون. صدق الله العلي العظيم.

your headlines on press tv as israel's genocidal war enters its 164th day, doctors without borders says the situation in gaza is catastrophic and words cannot describe it. the rights advocacy organization says israel has systematically targeted dozens of information technology experts in gaza as part of his genocidal war against the territory and russia's president putin warns the west against sending troops to ukraine saying it could take the world to the brink of world war 3.