including infiltration creation to fight the southerners use of the phones. one more. this c t i l or cyber threat intelligence league is a supposedly volunteer group with no government affiliations who fight against on line misinformation. but it turns out that spar from the truth a what's the blower has expose the scale of collusion between the group and us and u. k. government agencies that goes back years alert streubal view documents including strategist documents, training videos, presentations and internal messages reveal that in 2019 us. and you can military unintelligence contractor, the sled, by a former u. k. defense research. you sorry, jamie develop the sweeping censorship framework. this contract is colette s t i l, which partnered with c i s a in the spring of 2020. not only were multiple us security agencies involved in shaping the work of the safety aisle,

even attending weekly meetings. the whistle blower also reveals that as many as 20 of the brooks members directly worked for the f b i or the cyber security and infrastructure security agencies, or c, i s a s d i else ultimate goal was to become part of the federal government in our weekly meetings, they made it clear that they were building these organizations within the federal government. and if you build this 1st iteration, we could secure a job for you. so while officials from these agencies preached about protecting the 1st amendment, the group engaging covered activities to influence public opinion and sense or inconvenience narratives on social media and with the cobra. 19 pin demick of 2020 c. i a say director of chris krebs, even raised the city aisle, predicts in a fruitful future relationship. malicious actors are trying to take advantage of

coven 19 through targeted cyber attacks on businesses, governments, and individuals. see i as a government as working with partners to stop this through efforts like the newly established cobit 19 cyber threat intelligence lead. it's no wonder the c, i a say claim to 2020 presidential elections, was the most secure in american history. but mainstream media will still have you believe the city i leave was just a group of volunteer experts in cyber security looking out for the nation. articles about the group were published on bloomberg and the washington post. and these, these, yeah, elite members discuss weather actions, but potentially violated the 1st amendment. they did not the easiest ones that if we get away with it, it's legal and there were no 1st amendment concerns because we have a public private partnership. that's the one they used to discuss. those concerns, private people can do things. public servants can do. and public servants can provide the leadership and coordination. these latest mix paint

a vivid image of the west and u. k. governments. highly coordinated and refined efforts to develop social media censorship programs, but it seems if those actions push the desired narrative and protect the right interest, any tactics become fair game. all right, that's gonna do for me for now, but to stay with us. my colleague union o'neill will be in, in next in less than half an hour with more news by the the public. sanchez, i've been doing news over 30 years into languages all over the world. here in the

united states. interviewed for presidents worked good for 5 different television networks, and i believe after all of that, that new should be direct and impactful and this is direct impact the so here's what i want to start with when the moment finally arrived at the brick summit. right, announcing that it would admit iran and saudi arabia and egypt and argentina. if the opium and the united arab emirates few around the world were really surprised, at least not in the astute geo political route. we have decided to invite the ident, teen republic. the outer up republic of egypt,

the federal democratic republic of if your po, the, is law, make republic of theatre on the kingdom of saudi arabia. and the united arab emirates is a, for most of the world. just don't want her news because it was expected a. do you know what the real news is going to be? i'm gonna tell you the well news is going to be what happens next. as there's already talk of the future of breaks or breaks that could incorporate 2030, some people were even saying some 40 countries into their future summits. i ask yourself, home one of them action. but nowadays, it would be show many countries competing for an invitation to the breaks meeting. think about that, an organization that began with brazil, russia, india, china, and south africa join forces to try and balance western dominance. and now some

believe that in the not so distant future, right, brooks could be as powerful or maybe even more so then the g 7 or nato even. what is most interesting is it? well, all of this is going on and the. busy world is recognizing bricks and sees it as an essential group. in the united states, they hardly even know what it is here in america. most people don't even know anything about preexisting. if it doesn't even exist, most americans have never even heard of bricks. and if they have heard of bricks, they probably think it's a factory somewhere that makes concrete blocks or something. it's like, it may be by the way, that because of that i don't know what else to call it, but a mirror and so on our part, the bricks. good sunday, compete or even surpassed the rest of the world when it comes to the global economy and perhaps even the military round. it. it's argued that the,

as the west swedes through this briggs will continue to expand into a more powerful force, advancing and technology as we see within the a for example, and an artificial intelligence where it's clear that we in the united states have a lot to catch up to with china, for example, we're in china right now as we speak. there are a 9 year olds that are already learning how to program computers using a, i mean, there are 2 of you, can you me? yeah, but i, you, me a product this and bill it is up to measure as you see it. but if you are associated, well, i thought i would get he, even though because i was able to make sure to let you know. so what we're controlling is the door to door over x, but the important had that, let's say for him, but he sees rise for from the so say, let's see what is the, what's it, what's the point at which bricks could cause the

most damage to the united states though is when it comes to currency and there is no doubt that that day is nearing, right. in fact, the movement towards a bricks, currency has gained even more momentum and more speed and the last 12 months. why? well, let me take you through this. a lot of people are saying and believe it's because of the war and ukraine. how are they connected? well, here you see, even before the war, there were a lot of countries all over the world that are already concluded. that western countries, especially the united states, were just using economic war like tactics against them until people did us sanction fever sprays. and then aggressive attempts to force others on how to behave, deprived them with this over to you and force them into submission. you put you need. there is nothing unusual about dogs. you which know that with them, you know, this policy has been used by the west for decades. there is little

doubt that are politicians message of superior already and of almost at least the way it's taken as belittling and or sanctioning. any country that disagrees with them has manifested itself in as, as, as really the true origin of a brakes right. lot. how strong the reason. but in the case of ukraine, it reached an unprecedented level. why? there are 3 types of reactions from countries all over the world to the situation in your grand right. and let me take you through those. are those who blame russia and say there are fault. there are those who believe nato in the united states are responsible for bulking the situation and making it happen. and then there are, those are just, you know, don't care. they're just, they're, they're neither on one side or the other. but when the united states froze, rushes assets and accounts and impose sanctions on their exports and tried to deny

a lot of countries or right to establish or maintain relations with russia. the opposite of what the united states expected actually happens. so, feeling we economic threats and thinking that, hey, if they can do it to russia, maybe they can do it to us to a lot of countries including china, india, and a, and many of the african nations. they grew closer to russia not farther away during the crisis, and at the same time, they're also growing closer to brakes. and joining us now all the way from johannesburg is coffee colacho. he is a, a analyst who specializes in both africa and china to say that those are 2 hop zones would be an understatement. thank you so much for, for joining us, sir. thanks for having me, rick. so i'm really surprised,

i must admit, by the popularity of brooks. it's almost like country see it as getting a scoring uh, world cup ticket or a ticket of a super bowl. why does suddenly everybody want in? well rick, this is really simple. you have the status cool. and then you have something that's hot slick chilly, sol, so you know, everybody's looking at finding a different way to taste a new world, which many people call in emerging worlds. and what it is, is it's sort of the, the opposite of what's called a non western world, and that excites people at to 2 point very point $25.00 full drivers. first is the jewel politics. and 2nd does that. you can ox. interesting. you're in africa. so i want to start with africa. let's talk about africa. let's talk about why it is it suddenly, africa seems to be more interested in a lining itself with non western unions. why been africans

have so much trouble with the former colonizers? mainly the west anglo saxon world, which is really, you know, kept the unders boots for so many centuries. and it's sort of snapping, it's sucking it out, sucking everything that's possible, especially resources, natural resources, and africans are not getting anything out of it. if you've been following what's going on in the share, we're cannot 1st one mind in central african republic. africa is about natural resources, and there is a set up, a set up, an emerging, what's called resource nationalism, people and say, hey, o, resources must benefit us 1st before benefiting anybody else. and everybody's feeling that as split but, but if, but if the, if countries in africa and by the way, in latin america and other places that have all also been under the boot,

as you say, to steal your words. i feel that way, what, what one can't help but wonder if they still shouldn't go with the best available sooner. and if that sooner happens to be, you know, the u. k or the united states and the united states. and you can't complain and say, i know we did a horrible things in your country and, and your continent in the past. but, you know, let's just let bygones be bygones and look, let's, let's look toward the future. could they, could they still muster some kind of appeal if they did that or is the problem that they don't do that? well, they're not doing it. and one of the things that's exciting is in fact uppercase, having a contrarian word of looking at what's called you know, dealing with the devil. you know, the one you don't know. and they're saying we taking a different way. we can a try to know, trying to do moves to find something else. we want different choices. we want to experiment, then let that experiment that lets us try something new,

alternative partnership with russia, china, any other countries that are showing that even turkey? and i think that's what it's not just, it's exciting, but the ability to have a agency that choice to try something new. it's really raising up the whole of africans. when you say, try something new, you mean, don't look necessarily toward the west, right. look to india, look to china, look to around, look, a saudi arabia, look to russia and look to these countries who in the past have not been the bell of the boss. right. and we would hope african would hope that something will be different there, as a chinese quoted when we, you know, but we also a very cautious for city ain't going to be when, when, but wait a minute. when these people become so possible, we may not have that. we may have the same old stuff coming from the airport section, but still list, right? yeah, yeah, that's not to say that china is not going to lend you a lot of money. and then at the end, squeeze you with interest rates that you can handle just like western countries

have done to a lot of developing countries as well. but we'll leave that for the future. let me ask you this. i'm wondering. i've been watching how briggs has become unbelievably attractive to most countries, especially like within the last year and a half. and it just so happens that in that same year and a half, we've been watching, what's going on in ukraine where the united states, as really, to use your term again, put the boot on russia. i mean, done, things that, you know, from an economic standpoint almost seems more like i can help. but one, by the way, countries in africa and around the world have a line themselves with russia. some argue because of that. so emotional wondering then if those same countries with align themselves with russia, because they've seen the victimization, or what they perceived as a victimization, abrupt russia on the part of the west, are also now say, you know what? and to boat, we're going to join brit. yes indeed. in fact the ukraine price is a port a lot, especially the reaction to the ukraine prices from the g 7. a sent

a shiver in the people sponsor my goodness. if we dealing with this people, they gonna grab of money, they call it freezing us it, but we'll notice the soul and has it, you know, freezing more than $380000000000.00 of russian money. the chinese are watching bill . so under assumption. and then other goods you run and you know, the list goes on and on and say, well, we have a choice, you what kind of different choices and opportunities we're going to have. and that being said, we've seen that the bricks meeting the bridge stomach, because it brings people up an eclectic nature. you don't have to bow to a sort of model. the sick for one more edge, a morning union, latrell, person or group or country. they said we have an opportunity to have a choice, look at it. and the bridge summit is overshadowed. the presses in ukraine, even getting back. now people are struggling to figure out because a brick stomach was so powerful,

both in narrative and then new countries are coming and people are struggling to even describe with the old analysis. what kind of countries that is they don't get together. nothing really clicks, right? that is a challenge of tomorrow. you know, there's another example on the horizon that i can think of and being from latin america. as you know, i've always looked at the world through the perception of what has happened historically in latin america. and, and there's been a lot of horrible things that have happened a lot about our crowds, you know, in columbia and, and pat them on something. i mean, go and um, you know, even more recently some of the things that have happened in venezuela. yeah. you don't live or norton dislike chavez and venezuela, and we can have arguments about whether it's a good government or they made mistakes. one thing is for sure when the united states goes in there and freeze is better as well as assets in the u. k. no less and then shuts down their main corporation, sitko. you can't help, but ask yourself even if you hate that as well. do we have

a right to do this to somebody? it's right. it's right, and that kind of thing is felt across the globe now and today it's easier. so you have shows like yours that are now sending out the narrative, the truth about what's happening around the world. and people are not buying to the media. in fact, as being one of the most important driving forces in the image, the new image of the bridge. and i have yet to see a show that really looks at the brits and the media google me. yes, it has to be reported. and we're seeing, for example, that western media meant for media habits. i mean, i've been watching the economy is the financial times the past 2 weeks of buying them to where is a cover. thank you, coffee. you don't go away. i have more questions for you. so by the way, i wanna continue this conversation with you as well, cuz we can have this conversation on twitter where you can reach me at rick sanchez

tv. that's rick sanchez, tv. okay. when we come back. so what is the us media saying about breakfast particular cnn? yeah, it's always fun to check and see what my old colleague's over there are up to stay right there will be right back. the tape. uh, but with get ready to go was like whoever but i was calling to check to see to see . oh see ya named? um let's see. oh see, she must see washing who'd be in the, in the most i'm the you have to put us on that i can is on data lee and institution developed dependent on many countries. they have 1300000000 roman catholics around the world. and as they say in america,

follow the money that it can guess most of its money from pro western countries. that was a lot of the nato countries, spain, italy, england, germany, as well as mexico and the united states. so it is dependent on the fact that people sort of come on, let's get cool grants, and you've had, you have to deal with original why news? the sort of back i'm rick sanchez. you know, it's always interesting to see how cnn, where i used to work, tries to inform americans about global issues. so i got to tell you, i was a little surprised when i saw this headline. that seemed to give china some credit for the expansion of bricks. i mean a, here's a headline right here. i'll read it to you. bricks expansion is a big win for china is as cnn. but then at the same time,

they ask in the same settings, will chime uh, but can it really work as a counterweight to the west? and so implying they don't think that china is going to have the ability to muster the right competition against the united states. it's fascinating. edward joined once again by a coffee colacho. he is a special analyst on china and africa, who knows all things brakes has attended and is very familiar with the organization . he's joining us from johannesburg. you mentioned something about the unique position that is real lately, finds itself and i venture to think that what they're doing is playing both sides of the fence. is that what you're referring to or what do you think the role is? yes, i mean, i must say, i've been doing some research and touching base. i mean, i can give you my sources. but israel has been doing an incredible balancing exercise to try to figure out how that works, both to the united states and it with china. and that has tremendous jobs,

especially under that. and you know, was visited china already red carpet there. and they've given tons of business, big chinese, the chinese are managing, i think 2 ports out there and he's real, i think the port of haifa, and then another one i forgot the name. and not only that, also doing business directly with tech to companies in china and tech company is also an ego. and this kind of very quiet opportunity that's really good read uh, hasn't been talked about much for many people. in fact, one of the that's it is of china was from debt in his office when he arrived about a week or a month. and there were some guy speculation, but we didn't know what happened. but in any case, what is important to these ro, quietly is developing some relationship with, with the, with china and you know, the relationship variable relationship between the jews of israel. and then of

course china, they're using china and unbelievable story to know. i think it's still developing and how big can break scat? do you think? i mean, you've heard you probably read the same stories that i've been reading lately. people are saying it's going to go to 20. maybe go to 30, could even go to 40. 0, how are we talking about? i mean, i imagine more countries in latin america and more countries in africa. what else believes? yes, i think he's the reachable countries in africa because africa, the chinese are made clear is the future as well as the french say the same thing. but the chinese have little bit more serious. they have a 60 year plan and they're looking at 2049. as you know, the key dates, the time horizon, whether i think the communist party comes somewhere around a 100 years or something of that sort. but in any case, what is important of the bridge is going to grow already. so right. i according to the numbers i have 56 trillion. i mean in g d b, that's huge. i mean,

it goes beyond the 13 or 14 and 15 trillion. the do not state and they're going to keep growing. however, i just say to somebody that multilateralism is not for ccs. right? because the road to motor ledger is is going to be lucky, rough into some of them. in fact, i can see the bricks potentially in the long run, split into small groups, and this is a kind of world we're going to have. they're going to be big for a while, if the board and i the membership, right? and they have the right criteria to help them get together and focus on what really matches at this stage, it seems like the against the g 7, but they need to refine it a little bit more to what and go to what and um is bricks and my, my, my guess i don't want to lead you, but i'm thinking at 1st, if nothing else, it has to all be about currency. it has to be about uh, what i hear coming out of bricks and what i hear coming out of other groups around

the world, which is the concern uh for the dollar and a push towards a d. dollarization is that the ultimate goal is going to be one of them, but that's a very small part of it, especially at this stage. it's not just being against the us dollars, us going to come for the future. the brakes went to get a couple of things. the 1st one is the a, the, the idea, but also of the ideal of multilateralism. having a poly centers of power, people have agency, but important thing is the monetary suffering. when people can decide on over 70 using the money, the currency that there was, people have been using the term local currency, i feel comfortable using the term level. i liked the term national currencies in make small it's, it's more reflective. and so that's one thing, but sovereignty in general, economic security, of course, monitor sovereignty in other and let me try and put on. so let me try and put an

attitude on what you're saying. i think what i hear you saying is if i were a country, rick sanchez, is a country rick sanchez doesn't think that someone has a right to come and tell me who i can trade with, who i can do business with where i can put my money or where i can put my money and, and that has been the, if not the fear the reality of what's been going on, is that pretty much what you're, so that's the big deal of it. i mean, rick bliss, all of us have studied economics. so we looked at market relations, which is a country, a country beach of trade. we want to trade in on money. it doesn't make sense to trade with the 3rd party money. i mean, clearly what in the world under the since with 1970 to a 70 once it's an excellent thing. yeah. but people are not say what i mean. why don't we be, i mean,

the present in the prison of brazil rulers asked this question at this on the inside. well, in trading with the american dollar was a tough question. well, what, what was it? well, here, interestingly enough, this is a fascinating conversation. i, i love where you're going with this so, so the south africa have its own currency does and it uses it for its purposes. does, you know, and i'm in the, i have its own does uh. busy does you okay, does that does little of the silver have the same in brazil or as i heard little of the silver say when i, when i had last heard him speaking, his a assembly in latin american leaders, they're thinking about having a latin american currency and an african courtesy and an eastern pacific rim currency, etc, etc. regional currencies. it would that work with a might work, but it's a bit complicated because what they're looking at is the best of currencies. so that when they have this basket of currencies, people can trade in those currencies, they don't have to worry about the us dollar was the, the, the fits a consistent,

you know, treasury raising up interest rate and making it difficult for everybody. let's say, yeah, that's one of the reason they use the term level, but i am more comfortable with national. so if we trade in on mondays, we don't have to do to get the rep to somebody else and giving us a hard time. sanctions, you know, complicated deals. the us have more than $20000.00 sections against countries around the world. this is in see, and it doesn't help to you it because it's killing, go to trade. it in, in one of the elements are really important with his breaks is to say, we want to do global trade with less restriction and less sections. and the 2nd word, we want to keep our sovereignty so that nobody tells us how to behave. thanks kofi, that really was a fascinating conversation. you're really good at this. so all right, before we go, i want to remind you of something. it's a mission for us and it's really pretty simple. we want to be silo the world. you

know, i mean, everybody's in their separate caps. we've got to stop living in these little boxes . i mean, the truths don't live in boxes. truth is everywhere. that's all we see it. i'm rick sanchez, and i'll be looking for you again right here, where i hope to provide some direct impact the the, the,

the, the, the dest, i'm grieving and bill scales of. there's really fun. busy arguments return to the and save more than a 118 people have been killed over the past 24 hours according to the palestinian of coverage. the right you knew the idea of a soul came just minutes after a 7 days cease. fire expired. put guitar safe, it's in tops to mediate a neutral. this is really officials reportedly say they're prepared to consider it plus the protests in support as well as sending interrupt across the globe with folks and demanding of the.