of way molly somalia edit say we have somebody on the hatred tying the russian honorary concert into iowa who witnessed the unloading. definitely not who did setting up, but i thought that we are now in the ship carries green for the central african republic. this is a gift from russia for the central african republic. this gift arrived a little late because it was announced 26 days ago, and that they were in the port. we waited a long time in for various reasons. we didn't know we were getting it. we're unloading it today after 26 days. the ship carrying more russian aid has also arrived in mozambique on waiters and bob with the country is a permanent secretary of lions and agriculture said the 1st life is a crucial vulnerable community. i believe doesn't exist any significant demos will fit laser in. so this, if it lays that which is coming in is very, very crucial for our production for the people are not able communities that fit lazy is very,

very inductive for full window. each. for example, we need uh, 15000 metric tons for the presidential programs. so visa mound, which is come in, easy now freely to to, to always was which we know we, for our present job programs. so is quite a significant in these quite impactful when we look at production that 2 different plays i can do. so it will be able to do all of a say to $5000.00. that is, so flint, which is very, very, very significant in terms ofa production that can be done using that to fit laser is a alluded to india as in bob which does not preclude significant amounts of laser. so everything these donation is really critical. india's appreciated by

the some baldwin funding community. probably that's all for me. finality or what else? international. but my colleague, mike a quite she is here at the top of the hour with the latest our global round up should be happening very, very soon. i think we can join him then for the meantime. appreciate your company the the comer, sanchez, i've been doing news now for 30 years and the 2 languages all over the world here in the united states interviewed for us. presidents, i've also worked for several us major television networks and i believe after all of that, the news to be honest and direct and impactful. that's why we call this direct impact the

let's start with this one. earlier this year, the world court declared that the united states violated international law wanted forced the freezing of assets of ronnie and companies was sending a message. one that was uh, essentially already repeated all over the world. because it's what so many around the world of already been saying that the west and it's bags are weaponized in assets like gold, oil, and even savings accounts. it's, it's a bit of a worry, some trend, no doubt. right? one that has to do with our banks because they're the ones freezing the assets and even closing people's accounts and for whatever the reasons they're doing. so the countries they're doing so companies and they're even doing it, the private citizens. me tell you what i'm talking about here. it's happened to

a gentleman, his name, a lod. net. how roy? right, that's his name. he lives in los angeles. and one day out of the blue, he goes to log into his account with bank of america. right. and he finds out the account, shut down, it's shut down shutter, he can't even get in. so what he calls the bag, they have no explanation for the lod finally told reporters at the time he said, look, i'm broke. i can't even feed my family because i can't get into my bank account. now to be fair banks do on occasion for ease accounts over concerns from the police suspicious activity, etc. but the numbers recently are way up. is there that much more suspicious activity? well, here, let me tell you what i learned according to the banking policy institute, over the past 4 years. more than a 1000000 people have had their accounts shut down. americans. if you're asking

why was mister nickle rise account shut down? the answer is it was done at the request of the f, b i the f, b i eventually, after a series of media reports that determine that mr and a, her, i had the nothing wrong. he was able to move his funds out of there and put it into another bank, but it's irritating. it's irritating the thing that something like this can even happen. and that it seems to be happening now with more frequency. bank of america told me it was shut down. they refused to give me an explanation. they told me i would get my money after it was because of which he says he was told would take 10 to 20 days. and all of a sudden i find out i'm broke, can feed my family. now let's take a look at something. let's take a look at what's happening globally, which by the way, it is part of the reason that the us dollar is kind of falling out of favor worldwide as well, because of asset forfeiture. but it's not just the u. s. u k,

for example is also accused in this alleged highest. there may be no better example of this than what the brits did to venezuela when they seized $2000000000.00 and then as well and gold that was held in the bank of england. their pre text while they were doing so at the request of one, why don't and who the hell is one wide go? who's the some guy that the united states and the brits decided one day to a point as the new president event as well? yes, you heard that, right? they appointed some guy as the new president of venezuela, even though been as well already had a president named nicholas my door. oh. all right, so let's stop and think about this for just a minute. by the way, the u. s. and the brands decide to name out of the blue a new president of venezuela because they don't like the president who is there now . and then they seize the countries assets at the best of the president. they a point. now look whether you agree or disagree with that,

as well as present government or their politics. does any country really have the right to seize any other countries? gold and can their bank, who did so ever be trusted again? after doing so, that of course, there is a report in 600000000000 in russia's assets frozen recently by the united states, the u. k. and canada. in march, 1 of the most significant sanctions, everyone's like that on any country. and it leads one to as give a questionable, controversial or be stabilizing invasion of any other country be at the opinion of whatever other country is reason enough to take away a country's assets as well. then lo and behold, we have to ask, i mean, just to be fair as an american, why wasn't the same thing been done to us? here in the us, after the united states invaded iraq. i mean,

there's the seizure of funds from russian billionaires as well, or as they've come to be called in the western media rushes oligarchs. oligarchs is a funny word, isn't it? according to a p, some $30000000000.00 and bank accounts, homes, jobs, and other assets had been seized from russian citizens $30000000000.00. now look, i'm a fan of russian billionaires are all la garza, whatever the you want to call them for that matter. but what about us billionaires? i mean, there's really begs the question, doesn't it? should anyone who profits from a war or corruption of any type have their assets ease, okay. you want to go there, let's do it. how about c o is of lockheed martin, boeing, general dynamics, re fi on who got the smiles of the useless and disasters. wars in afghanistan and iraq, just the name of a few where the us deployed 8 trillion dollars and they got that.

we say that again, 8 trillion dollars. and if you want to find american all a guards, by the way, there's plenty of candidates out there. in fact, you can look no further than this guy. see that guy right there? that's billionaire harlem cro. he was recently alleged to been, he's been buying off supreme court justices like clarence thomas, with lavish vacations. i've got some drugs around the world that even a house for his mother. this is such an important topic and you know, i think we've got the perfect guest to talk about this carlon nixon in front of the show veteran radio and political analyst host of critical our on sputnik joins us now to talk about this. the idea that we have come now to a point where our beloved country, the united states of america can go around by the way. we're not the only ones, but let's just start there. literally freezing other countries assets in the case of what happened was with venezuela for it's cool with the, you know,

they're assets in the bank of england. they literally just stole her gold. i mean, i stole or gold. um, what do you make of this? well what, what, what, how would you characterize this trend garland? well, i, i think what we're looking at is this is the essence of the unit polar order. this is the essence of the rules based order. us made world order all of the euphemisms that tony blink and use this to talk about how the neo cons view view the world. it arbitrarily an arbitrary application of the law as opposed to rule of law. where in the us can basically do anything they want to and no one can push back the problem with that is that now there are alternative options for countries, alternative options for corporations. and so now that the options are there in the past where a particular country corporation, nation, etc, didn't have a lot of alternatives, as far as international economic and banking infrastructure. they can,

that have bricks is rising china, russia, etc. and so they could get away with it before because people didn't have other places to sink their money. now that there are other places to think their money. um, people are simply going to look for other options that are safer. and what do you make of just the bank of england case by itself, the fact that they literally and the way they want to buy on it was so fascinating the united states and england get together and they name a new president of venezuela. they say this dude white though is now your president, then they get, why don't the guy say name, not the people of it as well. who would like to know the united states names of the president then gets that guy who they name to sign off on their season of the gold from that country, which he is not really the president of my door. oh is the sign off on it and then they sees what was it $2000000000.00,

i think. yeah. $2000000000.00 of gold that just seems handy is held by that. yeah. and in addition, they also use one guy though in a lock. they are scheme to use the courts to grab the sit go, which is the, the international energy powerful energy corporation that was owned by the venezuelan government. they seized the money ostensibly we were told that they um, that they transferred to money the money to the one g y o and his alternative government to run the country, whatever that and it. but it seems that most of the money is that go, has disappeared. again, what we have is simply a criminal. so international criminal scheme and you know, the reality is this is not due. and i believe it's somewhere around the 19141930, some of 13. somewhere around in the united states, literally invaded 80, physically invaded 80, physically went to their vaults and took the gold out of eighty's volt and brought

it back to the united states. so as i said, the big difference now is when the world sees these kinds of things, they look for other alternatives and options. that's the big difference. they've gotten away with this for so long that they feel that they can do virtually anything. and when we see the, a hypocritical arguments that are made, whether is about conflicts, international criminal justice, the union, etc, that are made, the leaders of the united states are living in a past world. i mean, if you look at the up, let's face it, look at the age of the jo, binds the mitch mcconnell, the people who leave this country. they are still living in a time when they could get away with this stuff. and the world has passed them by and then we're going to pay the price economically. i think what they're doing now is economic warfare and economic warfare is very different from no direct warfare. now, i do know this has gone on for some time, especially in the latin america with the c i a,

in places like guatemala and columbia and the dominican republic, etc, etc. but even in those cases, they were working usually with marines who they had also sent in the c i a was heavily involved. now it just seems like it's banking transactions where we say ours is bigger than yours. and we're just going to take what you got as. yeah, well, there's another major factor. i think that's changed to change the game. and that is that the, the us, when after rush, they went after, you know, there are 3 world powers, russia, china, and the united states in the united states. finally, after going after, you know, smaller countries to do it for additionally going after countries that were unable to stand up, the us international power. they finally decided ok, we're going to go after russia and we're going to take them down economically. and if you look at the, if you look at the sanctions against china, the us is literally saying we have this international internet, a economic infrastructure, and we'll use that to take out the big guys. what that done is that sent the

message to all countries, such as, say, a saudi arabia say to people to the billionaires worldwide who, you know, what parking their money into by the u, a. e. and they had it out, some of it in london, it sent that message to them, but no one is safe. the international power players failed. okay. yeah, they'll go after the little guys, they'll go after some left, this countries in south america or africa. but we're too big, they won't touch us in going after russia and china, they've changed the game. everything you're saying is true, but it always comes back to this. and this is what should bother. all of us, not just me as an american. these things that my country is doing to other countries which seem terrible, it's outright thievery. it seems to me to go unchecked because there is nothing in the system. neither are political team players nor are media players are jerks. suppose that reporters and journalist to cover it to say

it and to fight for a little countries out there who say, we're not going to stand, we're not going to stand for this because it's wrong and we're not supposed to be cheerleaders. were supposed to be truth tellers that that's, that's my biggest complaint with what fits and themes, given what you and i do for a living, garland, how to use. how does it sit with you? well, you know, the said state of affairs is that the u. s. media is now simply an operation arm of the us government, particularly the us state department and the, and the intelligence communities. and what they do actually is they act as a medium to rather than cover what the government is doing to cover up what the government's doing. i firmly believe that if the american people in the aggregate understood what their government is doing and understood why that it would be rejected. so we're at a point now where what they're doing is so obvious and so wrong that they have to

hide it from the american people. and that's the now the job of the united states media. sadly, we're now in a country where if you have an alternative perspective for perspective, when you make an attempt to, to voice that on social media, you'll be sense or mainstream media. you won't get back on anymore as you and i both well know. so the media, they just cover me in for these uh, you know, kind of like a mob lawyer here there to cover the crowds. it does seem though, recently we've never gone as far as we've gone, especially in the case of russia. the numbers are astronomical. the assets taken from oligarchs. i'm no fan of all the guards, trust me. but i think we just, we got just as many in this country as they do over there. but the fact that we're just taking private assets away from countries and people seems to me like almost a bridge too far and where will this lead?

i'm concerned, it's what we're going to talk about with god and next. and when we come back to stay there, girl, i will continue this conversation on the inside. by the way, if you want to continue this conversation, we can do so on twitter or x or whatever. you call it these days. my handle. rick sanchez, tv. that's rick sanchez, tv. let me know what you think. whether you agree or disagree. i'll see you there. so when we come back, the money that used to be in the bank of afghanistan, who does it belong to now? us or have kind of stem the malware, but the

public are you still not us? he's got his new my so if you are using the why, it's what i showed you and somebody on the phone to the school is also part of mine that yeah. so um, but in this tool disposal setting this stuff, it is up savings. so you have some people to see those who manage to free, continue the work of undermining russia. nobody needs team is opening offices in the us grants as a team usually though, so similar to this i was up to do so we need to, especially if i do, it's about seo manual on a for me,

at 4 in the office for the other thing is that sam got the new guy up as the to the shirts, but allow me shift. so the democrats at dogs a deal example of course i see give the rest of the family. gotcha. the . so let's continue with this last year, president by the announced that he was transferring $3500000000.00 from afghanistan to a trust fund established in washington. the president said that he was doing so because he wanted it to be available for humanitarian aid. and for possible legal claims from the families of the victims of 911, something that happened more than 20 years ago. right? so you have to ask yourself, we have to ask ourselves, is in our place to take very money

and we're back with uh, got a nixon veteran radio and politic line list the voice of the critical our on the sputnik and i guess we can have this conversation without cutting to the chase, and that is the currency of what's happening right now. $600000000000.00 and russian assets had been frozen by the united states and the united kingdom and canada. that is an astronomical number. $600000000000.00. i don't even know where to begin. garland with that number. oh, well i, i think it reflects a desperation. it's kind of like the person who, yo was, you know, you've heard the infamous analogy of someone who yells to get what they want. they don't get what they want, and the only thing they know how to do is jo, louder and louder, and the letter they yelled, the less they get what they want, the us empire, when after russia, you know, it was a full spectrum attack and but diplomatically economically, etc,

with the economic situation didn't pan out the way they had suspected, they decided, okay, we'll take more, we'll get more if we can just take their money. i think some of it also is out of your anger and emotion, the anger, it rushes to have the temerity to exist and to try to, you know, expand the there and you know, their economic power in the world which every country has a right to do so they're angry, they're trying to take them out, they don't know what to do, and they're just going to take more and more. and of course, let's not forget, there's the issue of green here. look at what happened to libya when the nato over through libya, likes for somewhere between $40.00 and $70000000000.00 from a small country like liberty of their sovereign. well, fun disappeared, but it didn't disappear, it was stolen. so i would imagine a part of this assembly greeting, they're going to steal some of this and, you know, the criminals will divided amongst themselves as best they can, but there will be a severe price. i mean, but i mean,

it's easy to just say empire for and criminals and all that thing, but we're not talking about the criminals. and we're not talking about the empires . we're talking about a nation, the united states of america, washington. one of the most admired countries on the face of the earth, acting in a belligerent way. and no one seems to be checking them. and you know, aside from the countries that are being victimized in this case, and that's just easy to do, you just say, well, it's putting, you don't need to listen to him. he's hitler, he's a criminal, as they often do. it has to go beyond name calling and this type of activity i guess i'm looking for for a solution from you is there was, well, i'll put it like this. you know, the nature of the world orders. that is, that a solution is arising even as we speak. remember, you know, difficult times that never changes a person, and it exposes their initial nature. so what we're seeing, this is what the empire is people for many years thought the, you know,

in the united states felt that they were living on a luxury liner. and the reality is they were living on a pirate ship. they were on the jolly roger going around the world steel and everybody stuff it is being exposed now, but, but the nature of a world order is, as i said, you have bricks. you have a shanghai cooperation order in recognizing that the u. s. lid economic infrastructure is on trustworthy. it's just natural other countries are saying we need, we need to build some alternative infrastructures, people who invest capital, what do they want most? and mostly they want stability and secure security with their investments. so this is just natural economic rules that happened. people are seeking an alternative method to have stability for their, for their investments. they see the us will steal it. and so they're going to build something else to that where they can put the money in. and they can be assured in the long term that their funds will be secure. this new situation,

we're now dealing with, with israel and come off. and obviously, you know, israel is killing 34 or 5 times as many people as hamas killed and what, how much good was wrong. but what israel is now doing with the cooperation of the united states with the assistance of the united states is being seen certainly throughout the world, and certainly in the air of world as just dastardly at this point of this balance that you and i just talked about where we see russia starting ravia, china, ron, even previously to an a certain extent, israel, what is going to happen to that consortium? now with this new wrinkle, with this new potential escalation in the middle east. i think what's going to happen in, you know, i talk to a journalist who are based in the middle east and what they're telling me is that the, the people in the muslim world in the middle east now clearly understand that they

have to turn to the east they have to turn to russia, china, even india. they have to turn away from the west. they don't trust the waste west anymore. they seem as literally a seat in the west as their enemies and they are they of course, this is a very dangerous situation. they want to have this situation, do you know to be alleviated to dealt with, but uh, that's it. this is the final nail in the economic coughing of the, of the let's just say the ties between the west and the middle east when this is. so yeah, here's where the power, what, what the, what if it will that, can this, let me ask it this way. is it possible that this can do anything but empower that new consortium as i call it, these countries who used to be outliers who are now coming together and pushing back on the us global economics as well. it will absolutely, absolutely. it will, it will empower them very much because of the, the issue. if you look at your,

what is the issue with europe as if europe have economic power, industrial power, etc. but what they don't have is the natural resources and what the new a group of powers is coming together. what the new world order is really doing. it's bringing together the countries that have not been the industrialized is bringing together china, russian, india of the industrial powers with the powers of natural reason with the natural resources, the opec's, africa, etc. so they're creating a future environment of, i mean, an incubator for great economic power, and they're the, the traditional powers and making enemies of them and that, so there will be no trust to do deals. they just feel like we've got to work together. we've got a bill together, we've got to save our money together. i think that's what you're going to see. a complete lack of trust and a dissolution of the current world order that will be considerably sooner than that . we thought it would be gone. and nixon veteran radio and the political analyst

and host of the critical our on sputnik radio. thank you, my friend. thank you. so before we go, i want to remind you of our mission. it's simple, really. what we want to do is kind of be silo. the world we've got to stop living in these little boxes where we only think are truths matters to stone live in boxes . truth is everywhere, expansion. and i'll be looking for you right here, where i hope to provide a direct impact the is already those lines. as can be started by line, peace can be scattered by true importance of wiki links can never be kind of

a station. so that transparency is extraordinary. john mystic patrice then just succeeded in finding documents that existed in making them available to the world public. i mean, what could be more holding back by publishing information and sharing information with the public. he was exercising the rights for a speech he did so in the public interest wants to so long realize pen smith and golf and, and honestly, to relate continuously. i know why advice may know who is the guy that illegal anymore wisely bought. adjustments for to be on box weighing a $175.00. used to do it through the of sense it's all we going to let that stay the the

we were focused on making sure that the complex ongoing now goes. it doesn't spread washington strikes again her 2nd day of mess. all the solve. those written down on the admin, but read this stance, grows pace side as locals highlight america's motivation to 54 percent of our federal logic goes to the military. and the website is ation. mass protests you brought to across the world, installed a diety with palestine did not ease roll and the balance on the eve of $100.00 days of war and gas that quite high winds running pa to wait is the presidential election with just 40 percent of the vote aging so as a result doesn't represent the mainstream a p d.