the the american show host tucker, coughing, concerns an upcoming interview with russian president vladimir putin. he says they want americans to get the full picture on the ukrainian conflicts. americans have a right to know all they can about a war there implicated in. and we have the right to tell them about it because we are americans to freedom of speech is our birthright. we were born with the right to say what we believe that right cannot be taken away to better who is in the white house. she has invested into the you and as last down south west for covering now for kids, the truck that is in don't bass, the sands, your brains, regular shelling of civilians shows how brussels of regina really is at the present. ukrainian member of parliament reveals as the landscape

plans to dismiss ukrainian army commander in chief and his aides media reports. the president fee is a mandatory new to me, the books, if you're having join us. i'm a day show i junction. you're watching the r t international jobs from us. go stick with us in the next half hour as we take you through some of the biggest stories we've been following. and we begin with swearingen primrose making the rounds in the media, which may not come as a surprise. but our true america show host tucker costs and is confirmed. he will be interviewing russian president vladimir putin. the form of fox news headline assess. he wants to share the other side of the ukrainian conflict, something breast and media rarely to this is david warren, ukraine began american media wetso, spoken to scores of people from ukraine,

and they've done scores of interviews with ukrainian presidents lensky. we ourselves have put a request for an interview with so and see we hope pete steps with the never easy is already done in the united states or not traditional interviews. they are forming pep sessions, specifically designed to amplify. the wind speeds demand, the thing us enter more deeply into war in eastern europe and pay for it. that is not journalism. it is government propaganda, propaganda of the ugly. it's kind the kind. it kills people well after days of wild speculation and tucker carlson, becoming the most discussed topic on twitter along side bottom. you're putting the tucker has finally confirms that he will indeed be doing this interview with the russian president this announcement. and his explanation for this decision came in the form of a 4 and a half minute video that tucker posted on his twitter account. and in that short window of time, he was able to, he able to shed a spotlight on western hypocrisy for the entire american public to see the fact

that we've seen so many interviews with ukrainians that support the key of regime. and with the ukranian, the president himself, but not one such a interview. have we seen with vladimir pool? at the same time? our politicians and media outlets have been doing this. promoting a foreign leader like he's a new consumer brand. not a single western journalist has bothered to interview the president of the other country involved in this conflict. flooding or putting. most americans have no idea why prudent invaded ukraine. we're just goals are now. we've never heard his voice . that's wrong. the americans have a right to know all they can about a war there implicated in and we have the right to tell them about it because we are americans to freedom of speech is our birth right? we were born with the right to say what we believe that right cannot be taken away, no matter who is in the white house and is video tucker also said that this interview is going to be open source on twitter because obviously not in a 1000000 years with the main stream media really show anything like this contents

that we're going to see soon. but we also got an idea of tucker's ideological motivations. first and foremost, that he said that the duty of journalists is to inform people. and it was really good to see him call a spade a spade when he said that the american public is unfortunately not informed when it comes to the cranes conflict. according to tucker, he says that that's because the mainstream media lies generally for emission. and that's created a situation where the american public doesn't know why russia launched the military operation in the 1st place. as far as we know, this is the 1st time he's attempting to interview the president brought him to put them right. that's right. tucker has said that he's tried to do it before and in this video, he says that the binding distraction spied on him both last time. and this time, almost 3 years ago, the buys administration illegally spied on our text messages and then linked the contents to their servers and the news media. they did this order, stop a put interview that we were planning the last month for pretty certainly did exactly the same thing once again. but this time we came to moscow anyway. if what

tucker says is true, i mean, this goes back to what he was saying about the duty of a journalist being to inform people. tucker tried to do just that. and the same people who pontificate to the world about democracy and freedom apparently stood in his way. now we did hear reaction from the white house. they completely refused this person contented it because uh, preview video, ministration has who's been substantive injury testing interview. did you have a comments on either the interview or? absolutely no absolutely not. a commenter actually. totally not a comment to be more clear periods. what do you think it's going to be the reaction the following, this, this confirmation? well, we've already seen reactions based on the from when people understood that he was in moscow in general several days ago. and that caused liberals to throw an absolute fit across the internet. some people were saying that he shouldn't be allowed back to the united states simply for setting foot and russia,

while others accused the republican party of taking marching orders from moscow as prudent is trying to court the mag of g o. p. in the united states. in fact, one of the leaders of the mag g o p is in moscow tonight. it's the man you see here with a mag, a leader, donald trump, tucker carlson, of course, calls them is now just a nother far right. conspiracy feather with a show in the internet is no longer on foxes. we all know. perhaps we need a total incomplete shut down of tucker carlson. re entering the united states until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on. he is a traitor. now if people are upset now, i mean, we can only imagine what kind of reaction we're going to see when this interview actually becomes public when people can actually see it. but it also makes one wonder why so much hysteria over just a small interview in the mainstream media. and more importantly, why is it costs so much fear in washington? perhaps it could be about the fact that after years of trying to paint this caricature of an evil dictator allowing vladimir putting to show a human face,

the american people could be a little too dangerous for the establishment in washington to discover many means of the natural line walk in, individuals who protest doctor coffin's decision to interview vladimir preteen. social media users were quick to point out that other journalist who had previously interviewed the russian president received no backlash, yet it's costs and who has now been called a traitor. in response to some independent journalist of cold out the mainstream media for demonizing costs and for his decision. the only reason tucker carlson in russia is controversial is because the rest of the media has been all the way over for the censorship regime. why are they so afraid of tucker, talking to put in the corporate media does not want the american people to hear both sides. they are mouth pieces for the us military industrial complex and the washington d. c. political establishment. their fear is rooted in tucker's criticism of the

military industrial, complex and government. i'm grateful for the stupidity of rupert murdoch, the wisdom of elan musk and the courage of tucker carlson that resulted in the most important interview of our time. i'm looking forward to watching it. joining me live now from virginia in the united states is journalist and analyst. why it's read. thank you so much live for making the time. call scene is currently being demonized as a trait to invest in mainstream media. will have a lot to me is the landscape on his show. busy draw similar criticism, you know, obviously not having, having as the lens you would be no issue at all from the perspective of the liberal leaders that are reacting so strongly to this. uh, that's what they've been doing us for the past 2 years now. since the beginning of a rushes intervention in the print in civil war. obviously that wouldn't draw

a similar reaction. the daughter housing has always been under attack domestically, especially from the, by the administration. specifically for his efforts or attempts to uh, to allow western audiences to hear what the russian president has to say. in fact, of my colleague at the grays on, on your current bill was actually named specifically in western media as a, quote, us based kremlin intermediary. when she attempted to allow the tucker carlson to contact a higher ups in the russian government in 2021. that incident actually was later on expos, by the type of crossing. this is the beginning of his surveillance by the n s. a in the united states. which was not only monitoring his attendance to communicate with

the deputy foreign minister of russia, but in fact actively interfering in those attempts. they were blast multiple times, multiple emails. so we know that the us government and in particular the buying administration, the kind of deep state that we talk about definitely has not wanted this interview to take place for a long time. and presumably that's why tucker carlson has to go to mosque out to allow for that to happen in an uninhabited and free way. and that's pretty disturbing if you look at it very closely why it a journalist are expected to always, always consider all the angles, insides of a story when reporting. what does the attack on causes blind interview approaches say about what's the immediate coverage of russia? i'm the war, a new crane that says every thing, it's a perfect so micro cousin for what the so called defenders. a free speech actually

think about free speech, which is to say they disapprove of it entirely and they're totally willing to discard it. when it proves politically inconvenient and that's exactly what we've seen over the past several years. we saw uh, similar things happen uh to, to general a slight myself because i worked for sputnik at the time. i was labeled the russian state affiliated media all over social media drastically reduced in the algorithm. that was part of a broader efforts. the a, you, obviously at a r t are no strangers to this uh, completely banned from the airwaves in your shut down in the united states. so it's fine and parcel of the broader sub version of all of the, the rights that we are supposed to have in the united states by the very people who claim to defend them and read. there is so much education right now in west and

media. how significant is the timing of call since interview? what sort of impact do you think it will have on the prevailing narrative about russia in that country a willing remains to be seen? so we'll have to see exactly what is said in the interview and the extent to which people in the west are even allowed to consume it to, to view it. uh, but uh, taken together with the times this, this is huge shift type tied ship kind of, uh, in terms of western media coverage of the ukranian regime. finally, it feels like the mask is off all of the things that we were accused of being put in puppets. for the past 2 years, we're saying, well now finally the mainstream media is saying i'm, i have a feeling that we may look back at this interview as an,

as the beginning of the end of the ukrainian project, the ukranian proxy war in terms of the, the media atmosphere it's, it's never felt quite this way before, and i think we may look back at this interview as a bit of a turning point. john, less than analyst wired to read. thank you so much for speaking to our t international. my pleasure. several people have been killed and others injured in and is runny as strike on the syrian city of homes. that's according to the country's defense ministry. syrian and defense systems attempted to talk the attack, but in the end, separate residential. busy un squared destroyed, emergency teams are on the scene and work them to care the degree the address is request. thank you. and security council is convinced to address the screens were sent stripe on the russian city of lisa chomsky moscow cheeses camp of targeting civilian areas in order to instill panic

and create misery. of the 28 people died, including a pregnant woman and her child and a missile attack cared up in the ukrainian armed forces. we have no doubt that the targets and the timing of the attacks were chosen deliberately. there are a few recreational places in the city and the neo nazis deliberately waited for the moment when families would go out for a walk on a day off and cynically attacked. one of the only places of leisure in this a chance to strike was probably carried out with hi maurice. today, we'll probably hear claims that russia convinced meetings on ukraine too often we do not come up with excuses. ukrainian militants have become so violent that every week they hit civilian infrastructure until civilians on the territory of russia. this is the 4th terror attack conducted by ukraine against russia in just a month and a half russian ambassador. and in bands he gets up to the floor of the un security council, the 15 member body that leads the united nations to expose the tragic consequences of continued us backing of the key every shame originally. and that is recently

ramped up and see its attacks on civilians. the united states and the united kingdom both sang a familiar song, landing russia for the entire conflict, saying that the civilian deaths would never have happened if the war and not taking place in saying the war is entirely rushes false. the kremlin bears full responsibility for the uncomfortable death and destruction brought about as a consequence of pollutants war of aggression against ukraine. russia is the only aggressor in this war, and the only one that could end this war today. so when russia comes to this council intends on disseminating that propaganda, let's just instead or remember who is responsible for this war, on this terrible human cost. and when russia campaigns to undermine the supply of wisdom weapons, as they do again today. let's just instead be proud to stand resolutely with

ukraine. when you much was today. we heard cynical arguments that we would not be sitting here today if the rest consideration has not started. the wor no gentlemen, if we had not started them special military operation, tragedies like the one in list, a chance would not have happened almost repeatedly every day as they happened every day for 8 years until 2022. but you didn't notice it then. now, recently there was a discovery in georgia of a plot to attack a russian city bombs that were described disguised as essentially car batteries. and that points to the terroristic nature of the ukrainian forces and how they carry out activities in a similar nature to isis. and other extremist groups, here's what the russian ambassador had to say about that issue before the security council. the seizure of explosives and the george and russian border has also become public knowledge. they were intended for a terrorist attack in verona. shouldn't possibly in tbilisi alone major from zalinski. his party is behind this action, which was aimed among other things,

placing the blame on georgia, here's where the western money goes to fund projects. and the style of the most notorious terrorists from isis, ukrainian army feels that can act with permits of this and impunity, they feel the unconditional support of brussels in washington. so why is russia being blamed for this, this american western narrative that russia is responsible for everything that goes on in the conflict? it doesn't seem to match reality, but it just gets repeated over and over the let's now of course, live to international attorney kind pressing joining us from nashville, tennessee. thank you so much for joining us. your great showing of civilians in the russian territory is increasing. as we've been reporting though un secretary general antonio gutierrez, often condensed them where you get to see a tougher stands on ukraine by the u. n. as we've seen on russia. what do you make of this? is this car for the course? it's, it's what's been going on the, at the, you in, with respect to russ uh,

you know, for the last couple of decades, frankly, with the power to veto the united states as an ukraine is, is, uh, united states is quiet. so there will be no relief in the united nations despite the uncomfortable already the evidence of you know, attacks on civilians in the don bass. this has been going on and nobody ever even heard about these type of types of occurrences in 2014 and a through 2022. and yet they were going on and of all time and you know, over 14000 innocent civilians and been killed by you kindly and forces during that time period. you never heard anything in the western media about it. so, um, sadly it's,

it's the same old story and they'll be complaints made with un security council can be and there'll be no action taken by the united nations to uh, for tail this terrace activity and klein, we see the rushes left to constantly trying to shed light on the suffering stemming from west and back ukrainian attacks on civilians. what sort of response do you expect to you and to take if this continues so sadly out of the united nation take no action. because you know, as i stated earlier, the united states is one of the original members and has the veto power of united nations. and no actions can be taken because the united states will they tell and you have britain and france as well. so those 3 countries that are

like make up part of the, the supporters of ukraine in this conflict uh with the link to anything. so there will be, there will be no action taking the benefits. anyone in the right. what then? so you saying crushes response to, i mean it, the government is required to protect its citizens on our as national know what sort of legal response do you think russia would be considering in a situation where the united nations and that security council have refused to address such killings on its territory. well, unfortunately, russia is going to have to continue along the lines of the responses that it is made and had made so far, including the, the military operation, indeed crane. and that is, it can only be resolved militarily. it cannot be resolved diplomatically at this

point. um and you know, it's gonna have to be handled military, and that's the side reality, the sad reality indeed, interaction. no turning, try and pressing. thank you. so that for speaking to our, to international i keep early in a separate and un security council meeting regarding the crisis in the middle east, rushes and boy called out of washington's policy in the region. if tuesday you as a violating international law for the city on geo political game, that story is coming up later on the program. and so i'd ukraine disputes or a more parent into security council as a ukrainian member of parliament was revealed in his social media post of the country as president intends to fire his commander in chief and the general's deputies. there was an interview. vladimir zaleski address the potential shakeup,

default of shut them out, they, there was much talk about the role of the commander of the armed forces. general was a looseness and his possible removal. so this concerns the people who lead you create a reset and a new beginning are required. and not only in the military spear, it's true. i am thinking about a replacement. this issue concerns the entire management group that drives the whole country. double the risk between zaleski and the losing a started last summer during kids failed counter offensive attentions rose after the commander of questions. the president's policy has full. busy by the ukrainian need of pointing the finger at zealously. just like in the 1st world war, we have reached the level of technology that puts us into a style night. there will most likely be no deep and beautiful breakthrough in my patient being responsible for the results on the battlefield. there can be

complicated personal relationships, but ukraine is not about the personal. i expect very concrete things on the battlefield. despite this solution is popularity as ground with western media outlets referring to him as the iron general. meanwhile, back home, the commander has at 20 percent higher. a prisoner rating that the president became double. i asked bo, revealed that the overwhelming majority of ukrainians oppose the news. these removal with only 2 percent of the citizens supporting velasquez proposed for shuffling of commanding offices. bullets a winning journalist st. mahash is also your opinion that the president may face a military cool in response was told by the official, the concept, envision sustained support for as i lose me and reforms that would lead to the end of the zalinski regime. of course, ellen's the new that is the lose the was dealing with the west, the official site,

but the landscape would be dead man walking with the army, which is in favor of the general. he's going to have him use in a on his hands already. and my colleague grocery shay spoke with full a us military officer. that is left crap. if nikki says that at the end of the day it's washington. the current address keeps moves mos on and off the battlefield. the other ones i do have depended on, uh, independent government was quite happy working with uh, zillow, is there person, they could guy, they can control them and they're more or less trying to do on, in a hands on control and ukraine. and they trust them. on the other hand, there's a state department new and i need to know what's up with donna. right. they want but don't have to replace the loser because the doctor regardless is no strategist, madonna, what is her person? and he's a might surface 1st, and the thing is is productive. is it terrance? he's not just the terraces. he's on the terrorist. he's the, he's head of this bill. there is organization. and now he's looking at getting his

hands on the entire of the ukrainian military as a terrace organization. so probably ukraine is. it can't wait on the battle to best if it's got to buy time, but it's going to have a new kind of security defense. it's just going to get pushed back. it's going to be quite in uh, stalling for time. the only way to keep the p r machine running is by making bigger and bigger terrorist attacks. and so it's the west, either a dozen c terrorism or b e r. right. so it offers a great victory, and it strikes against uh, the ego uh, russian empire. it's only seats uh what the west narrative uh needs to be, at least as far as the state department, as far as am i? so i just talked to me about the book, the current flow of aide into ukraine is, is it, is it, let's get a position where he has to make who died off the main guy so that he gets his stuff from washington because i use every tory newton,

but they won't boot donald's to be the main guy. but then as the illusion here as well, um, what's the best way to continue with the flow of 8th grade? although we know it's a bottomless pit these days, you know, some of our side is going to continue. not only is uh, not, not only as that you broke it hungry into uh, allowing money of 50000000000. busy over 4 years or about 12 uh, 12000000000 change. uh there is a new set of bill going through. looks like the uh, the house republicans will sign off on it. that's gonna give you created a 60000000000 the vitamins portion problem is and it's not just for the money. the money is actually most that money is actually going to run the ukranian government because when uh it zaleski signed uh the uh, the signed the budget for new credit government. there was a $48000000000.00 hole in the budget. and that was for everything. non military, so pensions, uh, salaries, etc. so the american taxpayer is being crushed. i. uh,

as a flooring installation, uh, benefits are being cut in europe. the benefits are being cut in america. the us government and along with the european union, are now paying pensions without paying salaries. so you came over to india now where energy week has kicked off the event is being held and go on as being dumped . the country's largest energy exhibition and confront, subtract, and hundreds of participants from across the globe. arteries, runjun, and trauma. is that the event and brings us the latest? this is the 2nd edition of india and no gee, we where he needs to be inside does. he does, he make us all gather together to themes analogy, who signs the main focus agenda, re reading the g. 8 a waste and some 17 energy minute stuff, some across the world. so i'm willing to india. they will be moving by lots of with age in college, spots on so me to shoot that on the line, the indian

n o g on steve, remember india did, steve jobs. stan, define west and sanctions against multiples and continue buying more and more or would that be a data establish itself as a song the there in this newborn or the markets? timing have been any better destinations in the red sea. also, samsung is about lots of my due to incisive what i've been given to understand for myself, you know, as a disease, that is something that will be discussed in to find out who apples with an o g twice is analogy security facing ac. do on the emails. leadership is able to provide some simulations, some alternative opportunities to the challenges that all being used by the world. the next few days are going to be to show we will keep

a tab on all the developments coming out of the in the i n o c. we are in the indian western state of washington as violated international law. by exporting iraqi land for the sake of its own, dear political game, that's the message must go sense during a separate un security council meeting regarding the crisis and the major list. i just want the sticking with the bug that then was the shift see despite the bag that's achievement. and the security field, the situation on the ground remains fragile items. among other things that's due to the american attempts to turn the iraqi territory into an arena for settling geo political scores and accomplishing the narrow mind different domestic political tasks associated with that. somebody in washington is failed policy on the middle. the settlement and the upcoming us presidential elections, our american colleagues continued to see themselves as the self proclaimed as an arbiter of human destinies. in the worlds of john's army. those allowed to commit

any lawlessness in any violations of the international law ever since 20 on friday, washington struck more than 85 sites and the rock and syria killing of these 34 people. the attacks killed both civilian and state personnel according to your bracky or 4 inches, despite the fact that the us claims that to us targets in iranian process. following the strikes, a pentagon spokeswoman referred to rack as a valuable part that we've been very clear in terms of what we're, the groups that we're targeting, and the capabilities that we're targeting, that are associated with the i r g c. and i ran in the back proxies who are facilitating and conducting attacks on us forces. and that that is our focus. obviously, when it comes to the iraqis, iraqi security forces me iraqi government, iraq is, are valued. partner continue to work closely with that rack on counterterrorism. efforts and i'll just leave it at that the us as a temp they action and response to the that's a 3 american soldiers in

a drawing attack along this.