the the to blow up north stream. you for sure. i was busy that you need it and you have to have a i did not pull up in australia. american journalist tucker carlson brings the russian presidents on filtered views, straight to western europe. delving into this sabotage of the north stream gas pipelines among many other issues with the interview helping already be viewed over at 70000000 times on the export form. some american media figures and politicians. something puts a broad across and a rushing propagandist for simply doing his job as a journalist and also a head. this news are you crane's president sacks that countries top military come

under the, for a long running power struggling here, replacing general loosely with a month. most known for overseeing must have you've premium losses on the battlefield, the wherever you're catching the program from today across the world. welcome to the global use round up on our tea introduction. just hours after being released, a lot of them are putting his 1st interview with a western journalists since 2021 has already been viewed by tens of millions of people online. the sit down with tucker carlson, covered a wide range of topics including the ukraine conflict on the biggest act of industrial terrorism ever. been north stream blast. the american journalist asked the russian president whether there was any hope for dialogue between moscow and they told it gets too humiliating at this point for nato to accept russian control

of what was 2 years ago. ukrainian territory. right, yeah, yeah, no, i said, so let then thing how to do it with thickness thing. your, there are options if there is a will a vanity's nature cuz there's a leg up until now there is being the uproar and screaming. ability inflict thing is strategic, defeat the rochelle and the non don't fail the, the system, huge cope letters and yet i see, but entering and now they are apparently coming to realize that it is difficult to achieve if possible, at all. in my opinion, i think it is impossible, by definition, it is never going to happen when it comes to show. it seems to me that now those who are in power in the west and have come to realize this as well, that's our manufacturer's. if so, if the realization has set in, they have to think what to do next to we're ready for this dialogue,

while the interview covered a wide array of topics, spot dates again with a pretty thorough history less than uh, regarding the common history and the common economics and the common face that both russia and ukraine share. but of course, the main thrust of the discussion was on the ukraine conflict itself. we heard vladimir put in speaker, quite a blinks about the euro. my da include a ta that took place in 2014. he said that this was sponsored by the c. i. a we heard about the men's protocols and tucker also asked the russian president about the prospects for peace negotiations to which the russian president responded. and rather i might say, reiterated, because there's a something that he said time and time again. the moscow is ready and has long been ready for peace negotiations, but this conflicts can come to an end very quickly. if the west just puts an end to its supplying. it's a key of, of weapons without end. let's take a listen. i'm sure you should or should you should. what's there to work out?

it's very simple. i repeat just this concept of putting it on medication. we have contacts through various agencies, around schedule, something regarding that. i will tell you what we are saying on this matter and what we're conveying to the us leadership. we, if you really want to stop fighting and you need to stop supplying weapons, is it will be over within a few weeks. that's how much does it. and then we can agree on some terms before you do that, to stop, to me what's easier. why would i call him? now another important thing that came up in this interview tucker asked to let him or put in what was the possibility of russia perhaps attacking the european countries. specifically, poland was mentioned in black, proven, answered that there, there would be no situation in which russia were the tire care european country. and unless russia was attacked 1st, well, according to put in, he spoke a lot about the, the us dollar dollarization,

the decline of the dollar germany and according to food. and he said that probably the thing that did the most damage was when the us leadership decided to use the dollar as an economic weapon. that's basically dep march the beginning of the decline of the dollars to germany around the world. we're seeing countries um that by hoyle, moving from the dollar to the one we're seeing the steady decline of the global share of gdp of g 7 countries and the steady rise of the influence, the economic influence around the world of the global south as well as the bricks, economic block, and this is something that the russian president said is as inevitable as the right of as the way the sun rises in the morning was sick. it was somebody said the bricks. countries accounted for only 16 percent in 1992. but now their share is greater than that of the g 7. it has nothing to do with the events in ukraine. this

is due to the trends of global development and world economy, as i mentioned just now. and this is an image symbol. this will keep happening. it is like the rise of the sun. you cannot prevent the sun from rising. you have to adapt to it. you said we can. how do the united states of them soon as meeting with the help of force, like sanctions brochure bound beings and use of armed forces? now of course, uh as we talk about the rise of nations outside of western europe and the north atlantic continent. of course, china is a big point of discussion. and this was mentioned in the interview as well as tucker products. and as a lot of our put, and if he was worried about the rise of the economic rise in the political, influential rise of china on the global stage. and what her point said, there was nothing to worry about. because china and russia both enjoy long standing uh good relations and they have a partnership based on when, when cooperation but,

but a lot of our put and did say that the west is more worried about a strong china then a strong russia. the other main thing that was spoken about had to do with the north stream pipeline. sabotage is, 1st of all, obviously a lot of our put in when he was asked who he thought carried out these sabotaged us . he said, of course, the united states and he also talked about the damage it had on the german economy and talked about the fact that despite that, despite the fact that the primary suspect here is the united states, the german government did not offer any criticism in that direction then, the russian president said that could be attributed to the fact that it's already in berlin are more interested in representing the interests of the collective west under the leadership of washington, rather than its own. national interest could blow up north stream. the reason i say to you for sure that i was busy that day. i need it and you have to

have uh, i did not pull up your delivery uh shipping. of course it was each and how much would you say it was each. you personally may have an alibi, but the c a has no. so tell him i didn't. did you have evidence that nato, or did it that, you know, you know, i won't get into the details which people always say in such cases, to look for someone who is interested in this case, we should not only look for someone who is interested, but also for someone who has capabilities because they may be many people interested, but not all of them are capable of thinking through the bottom of the baltic sea and carrying out this explosion. and these 2 components should me connect those into this always interested in who he's capable of doing, but i'm confused. i mean, that's the biggest active industrial terrorism ever. and it's the largest emission of c o 2 in, in history. okay? so if you had evidence and presumably given your security services,

rental services, you would, that nato, the u. s. c, i a, the west did this. why wouldn't you present it? and when a propaganda victory, i wasn't able to identify which is looking for the indoor of propaganda. it is very difficult to defeat. so united states because the united states controls all the world's media in many european media. but i do see the ultimate beneficiary of the biggest to europe and media are american financial institutions. oh, don't you know that so it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. we can simply showing the spotlights on our sources of information, and we will not that you results that it is clear to the whole world. what happened then? even american analysts talk about it directly, staying on the subject that we just heard in that clip of the had gemini, that the united states basically has on global media and the difficulty of

challenging american propaganda. because of that, i think it's important to understand that in this a 2 hour premiere of this interview, where the russian president is giving the raul on cotton russian perspective on these events, we saw over 20000000 people watching on twitter alone. so that's not even counting tucker crosses, personal website, or other platforms where this interview could be viewed, or how many people are going to be watching in the future as well. so on that subject, i would say that this is really a victory for um, you know, in the, in the information that can challenge mainstream narratives when it comes to russia fall apart from getting the attention of millions of viewers worldwide the conversation spur, the american media into a historical frenzy, despite many mainstream media journalist having admitted to seeking a one on one with the russian president for years to no avail. fury can 2nd fast a tucker carlson for having being brought that the exclusive system

a suit and talks to an american friend. and while they may not speak the same language, they also kind of do. tucker carlson is lying from the streets of russia. he's what's called a useful idiot. i mean, he's like a puppy dog. why he's doing this interview now, obviously for the criminal and it makes sense if they want to talk to her across and doing the propaganda work of basically russian state media. how did he, how do you think he got that interview? know, quit lobbying a lot of praise on to the interesting tucker carlson still doesn't have a job. he's in moscow. how something i hope tucker halston is not a journalist, not even close. and the one that went well ahead of the interviews release we spoke to rushes and foster to the united states. he points out the criticism. mister carlson has faced that home for simply doing his job as a journalist is nothing short of hypocritical to sleep in the past few days that have been phone calls to the embassy, asking if costs and had been to see us before his trip to moscow and what

instructions, we gave him where he got his visa and so on. i want to ask the question, what about the 1st amendment to the constitution of the united states of america? why can this amendment on freedom of speech be used by somebody else others? i've tried several times to present versus position on certain sensitive issues. for example, the issue of fire security stipulates every american newspaper rejected by requests to publish rush position on this issue. today statements have been made by saving, informing us officials to take a call soon. what am i getting as far as which use of being an agent suggesting that he received a fee or salary? this is such nonsense. another example of double standards. cost him is not paid at the embassy, but the cost and asks a simple question. why should american citizens and billions of dollars of that taxes to the distant country of ukraine rather than to strengthen their own security or help the fights against drugs and poverty? it is extremely difficult to get through with an alternative points of view in america. one that differs from the position of the democratic policy if the united

states and for us it is simply impossible interest on trickling tucker. carlson has also released a video of his initial impressions. phones immediately after he interviewed the russian leader of the crime. then on tuesday, so we just finished our interview with lambert who were in an ante room in the kremlin. i'm waiting for a car to come, having a cup of coffee. i'm sitting here with the folder and fashion. i mean, when you get the documents that you gave me is obviously, is very rude. it by the rejection of the west. united states doesn't like for us with us. government doesn't like russia, us officials have sit on the record it and have said to me and are telling you much people that part of the tongues have to be rush or giving up frame. yeah. so it's like, if you really think that the condition of peace is the problem, is going to give a credit. and then you're, you're like a little tech and to have. and susie asked,

a reaction to the interview is all supporting and from social media users. with some pointing out that president clinton is making his u. s. counterpart let locking in comparison. i never grow tired of hearing preaching, speak in the west. you will never see a president given interview for over 2 hours and still do most of the speaking. who has an encyclopedic knowledge of russia's entire history, whereas joe biden can't even quote, the declaration of independence. prudent is giving 30 minute answers on the history of his nation. joe biden can't even remember the year. his son bo died. prudent. just spend 28 plus minutes going through a hundreds of years of eastern european history without a single note on him by and has no clue what he ate for lunch. utterly terrifying. okay, well i discuss what was that or what came out of the interview on the significance with our t contributor? i'm former american senate stuff or tara read. she believes that whitehouse is

fearful. the lot number putting this on the filtered messages to western viewers will undermine washington's narrative. a new train in the us uh, has been very outspoken with some of the journalists instead of rallying the item and saying, hey, you know, this is normal for journalists to want to interview the russian president. this isn't, you know, a great saying right? because other journalists have barbara, you know, walters did making kelly's name a few. so and they were threatened with, but she's actually does run with like espionage sensation. all kinds of things. whether any of those will come to pass. i highly doubt it. i, you know, this interview was a threats to them because it revealed so much truth and they knew it was going to destroy the western narrative about this proxy war. that the us and data was fighting against russia and ukraine, and vladimir putin to deliver, to be delivered fax, he delivered history to give a very methodical you know,

a walk through from the 8th century on. and he also, which i thought was really fascinating, brought up the us intelligence and how that apparatus has more, almost hijacked us at one of the democracy. he didn't say that per se, but he talked about how the us intelligence was involved with the crew in 2014. he talked about how it was involved with different aspects of falling apart relations with russia. and because he's actually right, i noticed he mentioned that by trigger carlton's attempts to trying to c i a right out of college. so you know, you're, you're, you're dealing with somebody who knows what they're talking about. the go deep into, into any interview that the take part in a lot of interest. our 3rd tar 57000000 views. right now i'm seeing on x a low not on target crossings at x a kind. what kind of from if occasions, what kind of reaction do you think we're going to see to this, to promote it with

a us audience? well, you're already seeing the legacy media trying to hit back, right? they are already doing hit pieces and whatnot on tucker and they're doing, they're calling him or a traitor or they're calling him. he was sitting with the enemy is really, really noted how they're not taking into consideration. this is freedom of the preston pit journalism of this job. if it's, if the cnn journalist was offered the view, do you think would be seeing a fraction of the base he's getting? now actually not, i mean tucker carlson is, is one of those people that really brings out truth and really exposes the deep state. exposes some of the, um, corruption, especially around ukraine. and, you know, that's, that's against their narrative. they, they want to keep doing this proxy war and they don't want anyone against it. so you may even have, you know, john kirby speaking out against a journalist, you know, um, or in kind of by proxy. but he was talking about also, while i'm recruiting,

don't listen to anything. he says that that's ridiculous because at the very least, america should be listening to what rushes trying to say. otherwise, how do we ever get to peace? how influential could this be? very influential because you have, you mentioned 57000000, but will probably go up to a 100000000 or even more when it, with replays and that's surpassing tucker carlson's audience on fox or any even combined fox, cnn, and all of that. so what's really, what's really great about this is that the american audience could see here, directly from the russian president, his point of view and really become educated because the bottom are putting said very clearly that they did not want to be the enemy of the west. and had tried with peace accord several times and were supported. um, so there you have a, can i get your thoughts on the comparison between the 2 leaders? lot of our put and, and at the american leader, joe biden, because just it's interesting tardy. just as he's been called professor at tutoring

giving, giving his history speech and giving his is views just as that was happening by me, was mixing up the mexican and it gyptian leaders, calling them by different names. where do you think they're their stature lies right now? 2024, who do have a leader who had this eloquent presentation by president putin for 30 minutes, who gave history talked about very different geo political issues. and then you had biden, who was stumbling all over the place and, and a legal document that basically called him on sit for a legal procedure. which means if he's not fit for that, he's on sit for the presidency. someone put him out there and he struggled because that's interesting. that's the timing. so the american people got to watch a lot of her too, and then they got to watch vitamins. so i think this is going to have a huge impact. i think that they're trying to deep stays now trained to remove so

they're fighting former us senate a tar every where you can watch the fold to our interview on or websites. we'd love to hear your thoughts on the sitting. going to our comment section is ready and we're taking at ortiz, dot com, the okay, to more world news on to key. if we're after weeks of speculation, presidents are lensky. how's the officially sacked? the countries top military officer, general valerie, that loose name observed those commander in chief of ukraine's armed forces since july 2021. and despite a string of recent military feelers, the general had become increasingly popular in the country with poles putting him far ahead of presidency. lensky himself. the 2 figures had been at loggerheads for months over the lack of progress on the bottle fields. the loss of key cities like archibald sculpture, known as black mood and the need to mobilize many more ukrainians, so loosely,

recently referred to the military conflict as a stalemate, which at present lensky strongly disagreed with. by the way, what general alexander serfs has been appointed as the new military commander in chief as the previous head of the printing ground forces starsky oversold last year's field defense of archibald as well as the subsequent fruitless efforts to retake the done boss. city. what keeps the army how separate must have losses on the front? an interesting side note source key was actually born in russia's blood, the near region, then part of the soviet union and later studied in moscow was higher military command screw. well, here's ortiz, steve sweeney with more on ukraine's been shuffle. the 2 men have been at loggerheads for some times. i intensified on that spot became very public. once it

became clear that ukraine's much wanted counter offensive had failed as illusion for his part described the situation on the battlefield. as a stone might know. some said that that was an overly optimistic of such assessment of the situation. but this under a very sharp and very public rebuke from that then ski who perhaps to a piece is western boxes, gave him little positive overview of the situation and even suggested that ukraine could still win the conflict. let's say what the to and said, just like in the 1st world war we have reached the level of technology that puts us into a stalemate. there will most likely be no deep and beautiful breakthrough. the time has passed, people are tired regardless of their status, and this is understandable, but this is not a stalemate by emphasize this once again. now cause that we're also shop disagreements over the d p on popular forced a mobilization

a policy in use in ukraine. loosely also wanted this $500000.00 additional troops to the front line in order to boost the ukraine's johnson of success is in the conflict. now, let's take a look at his replacement alexander ski now, but his background is that he was born in russia. he was trained in moscow if he listened to key ebc listen to crying, the crating of government save harold and his success in the defense of the conference was safety. in the early months of the special ministry operation, he is also charged with success in accounts are offensive in concord, where they regained some part of that type of fee, which of course is now part of the russian federation. but he's also known as the butcher of, of black moods all to most of course, he led back to the defense of that city, which became something of a meat grinder with thousands upon thousands of upholding trains ukrainian soldiers,

these new units. so he was shortly criticized lowe's tactics, so he remains sadie on popular among the ukrainian on forces, the members of the crating who crating on forces where his account oppose, illusion. neil, who he's replacing roommate, is deeply, deeply popular. so it's difficult to see what the shelf re shuffling will bring to you quite whether to bring any more successes on the possible field where ukraine is obviously struggling very deeply. and washington has been accused of being involved in the decision to replace the come on the in chief. i'm not aware of any discussions us uh, at high levels uh, between us and ukrainian for say something about the that decision and in a pre decisional way. we talk to are you creating counterparts all the time? but if the question is proposing that we were somehow

a bill and we had some sort of right to give it a thumbs up or thumbs down. that's not true. this is present. so wednesday is decision. now despite what cubby is saying, it's known obviously that the lensky is in very close contact with the united states. and so i believe that they robust time for a lot of the decisions that i'll take. and then we have this visit just a week or so ago from victoria, and you'd and the maiden of my don, who was in cad once more. she met with the foreign minister, the prime ministers of lensky use, chief of staff, although she didn't leave. was it lensky himself. now, the replacement of that loosely and things, a lot of questions. it could pose a lot of problems and the main one being the finances. of course, the ukraine has been pretty much begging washington begging the united states for more cash to fund this military offensive. loosely, 2nd is

a masquerade of action designed to attract funding from the us. the decision to a shuffle, ukraine's military leadership was announced the same time. the discussions are on the way in the us on additional funds for the key regime. this relates to $60000000000.00 of support for ukraine. platinum is a lensky can no longer compensate for his lack of real achievements by using deputy . so there's been a lot of pay off on spend now some question, the timing of the sucking of zillow's me. why did they wait until thursday? this thing was some suggestion that it was to deflect attention away from talk a call since interview with vladimir putin. but for now, the problem is on the pass. so feel remain on patience is running very soon. but we got reaction to this, including from retired us virginia state senator richard. black. teresa is it's clear, the ukrainian people have actually been losing faith thing, t s political leadership for quite some time the ukrainians felt that the country was better than a good direction. now only 41 percent, so there is a, as

a level of confidence in the ukranian government. and the course that come off of this, this immense counter offensive, which was orchestrated very directly by nato. they actually did sam table exercises. and now it has turned into a slaughterhouse. presidents the landscape is firing general's hallucinate, the chief of staff of the armed forces and ukraine, and the most popular figure, a new crane. and to some extent that was because so lose a was forthright with people. and he said, life is counter attack is it has stagnated. and it's, it's not going anywhere to sort of asia unpack us out and where the 1st results of the votes cast. in thursday's general election or being

revealed so far, independent candidates, some offices are backed by him or on comes p. t, a party which was barred from the pallet or in the lead. the muslim lead party led by x p. m. no washer reef is not far behind the pocket, some people's party headed by former foreign minister below. well, who to so doughty is trailing and 3rd and run count himself is behind. bars on was recently sentenced to a total of 24 years and corruption charges charges that he denies just to point out . that government can only be formed after a party or coalition wins a total of at least $134.00 seats. tragedy struck back us out on the vault that vote 30 people were killed and dozens more wounded by to bomb blasts, targeting the election offices of a political party and independent candidates in the country southwest. the economic state, terrorist group has claim responsibility. like i said, the alice selman,

java told me millions of folders were determined to help their say. despite the tense security situation, the. busy elections uh in my uh quite a few the investigator because. ready many people came out uh they. ready lodge done out of the but wanted to, it's a site that i toward and this was hard thing to see because of the pretty good for that. i mentioned that the witnessing and boxed up for the past 3 or 4 years. this was something which was in order to bring the cost people wanted to express the drive to expose their. ready to their one and they have done that. so the initial deserves would very much i'll be able to cause people that actually immunization of the police is being backed in by the beginning government are. ready and then back those people wanted to, you know, they were in favor of doors schedule. ready rules what modularized. ready pushed through the cabinet and that's why we see that the,

the independent candidates actually. ready what are the lead? yeah, we'll keep you aware of the results from august. i'm the general election house they come in. but next year, in order to we bring you parts to help them much talked about the interview between lot them are putting on us host, tucker carlson. the one on one is the 1st time the russian president has stuff done with a western journalist since the start of the ukraine conflict and the to our conversation to live. we want to try to hit the, [000:00:00;00] the