then use those contacts to smear him so, so you believe it was a treatment? it's a completely, it was worse than entrapment. it was a targeting operation and a complete set up. and then when the f b i went to interview, you know, it was on a complete pretext. if true was the 1st time haul per interferes with the presidential election, we know that the classified documents showed how he spied on then he was president jimmy carter to help ronald ray didn't weigh in the for the c i a, an operation to collect insight information on carter administration, foreign policy was running ronald reagan's campaign headquarters in the 1980 presidential campaign, according to present and former reagan administration officials. the surface identified stephan a helper, a campaign aides involved in providing 24 hour news updates and policy ideas to the traveling reagan party as the person in charge. and now he was spying on farms a including michael flynn, who was the national security advisor who had already been inspected by the way.

the crazy thing is i had just gone through a full security clearance update investigation, which had just closed about 6 months prior. it included a polygraph examination. they knew there was nothing absolutely nothing. moving on to joseph method, a professor with the secret he was presented as a russian agent by former f b. i, director james told me that was until a photo surfaced show in the so called russian agents with the british prime minister. that made things very awkward to say the least. but who was this mind working for, for the russians or for the c i a director the f b. i interview joseph and the suit on february 10th, 2017. in that interview mister mips and lied. you point this out on page $193.00 volume on mips it denied it's and also false. we stated in addition, mips it omitted 3 times. he lied to the f b i yeah, you didn't charge him with

a crime. excuse my art, it's one on one. i'm sorry, i think you said 193 volume on 193. he lied 3 times. you pointed out in the report . why didn't you charge them with the crime? so i can't get into a internal deliberations with regard to a waiter would not be did you interview? nothing accurate in that? is missing western intelligence or russians? intelligence can't get into that. lot of things you can't get into. well, now we know why house democrats on the intelligence committee, cold message kremlin linked, and a russian caught out. but a soul was told public and racket the missed. it was a professor who really worked for m y 6. and he was spying on towards papadopoulos . and member of the foreign policy advisor and panel to donald funds 2016 presidential campaign. and he, like many americans want this operations to be the classified, which is exactly what trump tried to do, to expose this network of law i as in spies. but he was blocked time and time again,

most noticeably by the c. i a director at the time. there are so many unanswered questions that the investigations kept covered up. i do believe that the operation will be classified, should trump get re elected, which is why his 2nd term represents an extra central threat to the intelligence agencies. it's a threat because the c, i a was the only spine on people without a warrant or a cause using their international partners. but they were also make your things off as they once a long and the high, the inconvenience of it is which points to, to 0, collusion with the russians. they codes the intelligence they made it look like page and supported from the evidence points. the other way we looked at the reports and the sourcing, they used to evaluate the sourcing. and then we got further to look at the data available to them that they didn't use. the overwhelmingly contradiction, and the conclusions that russia support of trump is hardly surprising by us

intelligence agencies broke a few logs. they've done it before. it's not even surprising to hear that they falsified intelligence. remember, iraq. but what is surprising is that is the 1st time we hear about them is usually psych and so so and so fear in their own political affairs. this is just another case. so you kind of make this off, even if you try, just about wrapping up this house program here we are now to international from all of us here. thank you so much for sharing your time for us here at the off the international mothership in moscow. returning as soon enough with a new program 40, that'll be a mixed up midnight most good time. so in about 25 minutes, i hope you can join us the

the president by new president. need to talk. i've said that repeatedly, publicly and privately, in the united states, for years, you cannot solve this without me sitting down. and this is not ukraine and russia sitting down. this is the united states and russia sitting down and talking about a serious way to have a mutual respect. and they have mutual security because that's absolutely what's needed for this world. the

march, the 112011, the largest squeak ever recorded in japan is we're interested of 14 media to nami, devastates the focus fema each and you'll see a power plants the the nuclear re inches are flooded, responding and her risk disaster. the id is b o n e t r e in june is living in japan and this nice to go to the area of the new the a male down into the machine. immediately drove me to talk to somebody about the event for us in the for the moment,

for ya, investigation stats. watch on tv, the the a hi everybody. i'm rick sanchez. i've been doing news for 30 years and 2 languages all over the world. here in the us, i've interviewed for you as president's working for the u. s. has major television networks. i don't like what they do. see, i think news should be honest and direct and impactful. this direct impact the the, well, disney company recently reported it lost 900000000 dollars in movies that, well just didn't do so well because people decided they didn't want to go see them . that's almost a $1000000000.00. now,

just how many bucks office flops of disney incurred? well, let's look at the numbers. where we learned that the last 8 big movies that disney release did not doing well. not at all guardians of the galaxy and the little mermaid and and if you think those are bad, strange world, white you even worse summer calling them complete failures in the industry. so when kids right. i mean those, those sound like solid title, solid beams, which in the past would have been great for disney. right. so what's different? but the differences, the characters have been changed, right? they've been modified, not just modernized, know they've been given progressive makeovers. and that is making many americans think that disney has just gone too far, and that they no longer represent them. for example, on cora,

one of america's most popular question and answer platforms, this question pops up. that's why we see so many gay and lesbian characters and almost all of us movies or tv series. most of the comments sounded like this, quote, this honestly drives me insane. i will start by saying that i have nothing against homosexuals or transgender is or whatever else there are out there these days. but it's getting out of control, stop quote. and there's this comment. i agree. the gay agenda is being thrown in our faces. whether we want it or not, look, as far as we're concerned, whether there's a gay agenda at disney and it exists or doesn't exist if it's not for us, but they got i'd rather just look at the numbers, the research. and here's what it sets. according to gallop, roughly 7 percent of americans identify as gay, lesbian, or transsexual, 7 percent. that means it would be perfectly normal and expected to see occasionally or 7 percent of the time or more characters on tv and movies,

who are gay or lesbian, or trans actual right? perfectly normal. but what many americans say they see, and what studies seem to show is that it's not occasional far from it. it's more like i'm the present or everywhere. in fact, well only 7 percent of americans may identify as l g. b, in movies, they're more like at a minimum 20 percent. don't take my word for it. this is a study that's done by glad this is a non profit organization that advocates for l g b t, according to their report. one 5th of all the movies that are made in hollywood have at least one l. g b, 2 character. that means according to hollywood, 25 percent of america is gay, lesbian or transsexual. now is that reality not even close, right. i mean, holly and. busy for training on america that is it like the real america? yeah, according to glad hollywood is it doing enough?

they want to make sure that america is more representative of gay, lesbian and transsexuals. well, that's what they advocate to be fair. according to glad hollywood still has, quote, a long way to go to get it right. what they argue is that we should be seeing more good characters. and so far, companies like lions gate and paramount pictures, and so many pictures on united artists and universal pictures. walt disney studios warner brothers seem to agree because they are in fact casting more eligibility characters. but apparently not enough, according to glass. studies do show that growing number of americans among those americans who support l g b t, right? so they actually support l. g b t rides. but there's sometimes i'm comfortable sitting down to watch television with their families and seeing on america that doesn't resemble the america that they have come to know for them is not a question of accepting l g b take. it's about watching tv shows, commercials,

and movies that tell them every family must have a uncle or a lesbian aunt or an eligibility son or a daughter, or a grand parents. even though real demographics don't bear that out. but that's not the only issue where hollywood is kind of losing america. but the fact of the matter is viewers who taking tv and movies in america, kind of get a distorted sense of who we really are men. for example, man. they're generally emasculated in the media these days and had been for about a decade or so. the leading man used to be a dude who was strong and not afraid to show his virility and his aggressiveness. sometimes maybe too much. sure. but that's now being put, been replaced by a softer version of man. and it's worse that are off. it actually presented as a stupid, clumsy not capable. whether you're watching a commercial or a movie or a tv show,

that's what you're going to see. a always have to be corrected by somebody else, especially women. because women, on the other hand, are now the super heroes. they are the tough costs, with all the right karate shots, while man has to be saved by them. women are also generally smarter and more capable than men in hollywood, according to movies, and according to commercials, or how they're portrayed. the don't get me wrong. men still make more money than women in hollywood. and that's not right. but when it comes to image, even close, and that's a some social psychologist. and so c ologist is having kind of a, an adverse effect on boys who are growing up in america who are just kind of confused. like, what's my role supposed to be? fact is the world, the hollywood creates is simply nothing like the world that we live in latin americans, for example, hispanic americans. they make up almost 20 percent of the population of the united

states. that means or one 5th of the population. right? yeah. when you watch tv and movies, according to studies, they barely even are visible. even though they're 20 percent of the population, they make up only 3 percent of, of the characters that you see on, on tv, and movies. and how are they presented in those movies? criminals cleaning ladies, drug dealers. the americans, for example, have it much better these days after all those years and being treated horribly by hollywood. now, even though they only make up 13 percent of the population, they say on the present in movies. good. see and tv commercials and, and tv shows by most accounts as seen by many casualty viewers, african american seem to represent anywhere between 25 to 50 percent of the population, even though demographically, that's nowhere near correct. and by the way, more often than not, they are presented positively by hollywood. cast us professionals,

doctors and business people and lawyers, white southerners, for example, our cast has poured bolts on educated bigots. the question is whether one group is better than the other. obviously, the reality of america is that filled with wonderful stories of great achievers, or black or african american, former slaves also, asians, and white, and hispanic. and every few in between. the question is does hollywood skew demographic reality? and in so doing is it losing america's trust in general? most conservatives, of course, so yes, but they're not alone when it comes to not trusting hollywood. many americans, including liberals, discovered a long time ago that hollywood is not the place you want to go to better understand the world of the country that we live in. in fact, hollywood, is that

a history of lying to us flat out lying to us no place? is it more audacious, more malignant then it's relationship with the military. did you know that the defense department has a special office of a special department within the department that works with hollywood to approve and even help right and produce the movies that you watch? and it seems that this is how they get us. for example, if you think about it, put yourself in the times of all these things that happen in the united states, those movies. and those tv shows is how they got us to hate the vietnamese one day . but then they switched to the rockies where the afghani is the next. then there's the terrace gloss. busy by hollywood standards, by hollywood standards, tend to be violent errands. russians are bullies, the chinese are sneaky. now remember, the japanese used to be sneaky,

but that's no longer the case. because hollywood decided to reassign the sneaky thing from the japanese now to the chinese. because somebody, and i guess the pentagon or the state department made that decision, talk about marching orders. here's the point. according to research conducted in places like the university of georgia. hollywood is in bed with the us state department and the pentagon. so much so that if you want to make a movie and they don't like it, it's probably not going to be the same. so say you are a producer and you want to make a war film. you would walk into the entertainment liaison office in downtown los angeles resale when a film an air force base or one, an aircraft carrier, i want to blow cold helicopters or whatever it is. and they will tell you straight away, give us your entire script. in the documentary theaters of war, you just saw

a piece of producers and directors explain how the pentagon insist on control of their message. that means you have to turn your script literally over to them. some people probably would say, well yeah, i've heard of this like the top gun maybe black hawk down, maybe some of the marble series. but what they don't know is how systematic this has been and how huge this operation is being. you can call it censorship. you can call it propaganda it's, it's all of these things. censorship, propaganda that says those are the words of oliver stone. now he is one of the few directors who have succeeded without seeking the approval from the pentagon. somebody's been able to bypass that, but that's one in a 1000000. so just how pronounced is the state department's hold on the message that we receive and movies the producers of theater award did a freedom of information act to try and get those details. those numbers,

which they say when they saw them, they were stunned. what we found is that thousands of homes, thousands upon thousands of products have been effected and are open rewritten. it script level by the national security state in the united states. during normal people know about that, go so they don't by the way, what do you say we continue this conversation? you and i how do you say we go to twitter? i'm there. you're there. call it x. call it what you want there. i'm rick sanchez, tv, rick sanchez, tv. i'll be looking for you when we come back. how hollywood sells out. not just in terms of a fake america that they create, but also how they sell out to the state department in the pentagon who they allow to rewrite their scripts. as i mentioned earlier, i just find that amazing be right back the

the and it was warmer to the office agenda to separate from the petro dollar and create a gold back dean are which inevitably led to the us nato, european union, mafia ball, to kill them at the edge of a bayonet know, throw this country. the 3 or 412 years has been the victim of one of the most. savage moultrie spectrum was the, the us and the u. k. a. e u and the allies in the gulf states. and then israel and turkey, and i was instructed that i had to create a crisis by a given date,

so that farms and this could be fired. and i, i made it clear that i would do my job. i would do my duty. we have seen of carry aggressiveness by the u. s. and the western powers take a fresh look around his life. kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality distortion by tell us to do vision with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse who really wants a better wills, and is it just as a chosen few fractured images presented as 1st? can you see through their illusion going underground? can

the hey, jordan, there's not a talking about this is ted rall. he's a political cartoonist and you can find them by the way, at raul dot com r a l l dot com. of course you can find them anywhere else cuz he's very publish. also very controversial. which may be one of the reasons that we have on the show that let's go to it. what do you say? let's do it. so last night i was watching a movie with my wife. i went to uh apple tv and i was watching this jennifer garner, i wrote down the title. the last thing he told me is the name of the series good series. you can tell it's well done. they put some money behind it and stuff. but right, as soon as i started watching it, i saw something about that that stood out for me as just an average boy in american guy, you know, where hispanic american guy. um, in the interviews jennifer gardener, she's being jennifer broader, but that all of a sudden her associate is an african american woman who is immediately like one of the 1st themes is kissing her lesbian girlfriend. and i'm

just thinking is that really necessary? but you know, fine, the fact that she's african american, then the next character is also uh, somebody who is obviously a day. most of the actors are academic african american and, and, and i'm saying this as a di ted, there is no worse atrocity in the history of our country than what we do to african americans. and they do deserve, and they deserve to be put in a place now where people can understand them as something other than the way we used to treat them in hollywood and the way we treated them across the board. but unfortunately, that's not what's happened. it's not honest what i see when i turn on movies. when i see hollywood is not what america looks like, but what they're trying for america to be there, maybe 3 percent the population escape. that's great. and they need to be represented with that. 50 percent,

african americans are 13 percent of the population. they're not 60 percent. so it's creating a backlash. that's empty hollywood, empty movie, and he entertainment backlash, which is creating a risk in america. that's my perspective. what's yours? a. look, i've experienced it personally. i pitch stuff to hollywood. quite often. i have a project right now in development. i had another project that was based on one of my own books. it was called really american to admit the worst thing i've ever done . um and uh, basically the show that was, it was pitched to me, someone came to me and said we'd like to turn this into a tv show. and basically i was going to be the host. i was gonna be the m c. and then we're gonna sort of have people recreate the worst thing that they'd ever done in episode after episode. yeah. at one point they come to me and they said, you know, there's this problem, you're a white guy and we're wondering, you know, do, do you care if the host is not you? i'm like, i don't care what the host is,

not me. i have other things to do. it's like do you care if the host is black, for example, or another person of color? i'm like, no, i don't care. and then the like, oh god, but it really should be you because he wrote the book. i'm like, well, you guys go to decide what you want to do. i can't become black. i'm just this is who i am. in the, in the whole project fell apart because they couldn't spoil that. they said that they couldn't leave the production company, said that there's just was no bandwidth in hollywood these days for projects that either showcase a white male straight assist normative able bodied star much less and m c. and you know it, it is. i noticed similar things. i'm in the world of pub book publishing. i went to the local, independent books earlier today. all the books in the center table that are featured. they're all this just like you describe, right. sort of like, uh, you know, my 1st lesbian kids or, or whatever. and i'm kind of like thinking, this is so american. we go from a world where

a black people never saw themselves on t right. ever, chico with a man was a revolutionary shot, right? for, for to contents, right. and then it's like now we're, we're like, white people may not see. hold on tv, and that's what this is the 1st country as you point. i agree, i don't think either one of us would classify ourselves or could be classified as people who are either racist or don't want other people to be seen on tv. it's just that when i turn on my tv, it doesn't look anything like the america that i live in. it's. i was a representation i one days. it's ok if you want to throw in a trans character from time to time. i certainly want african americans and asian americans and everybody else by the way, hispanics are 20 percent in population. we're only drug dealers in movies for some reason. but i so, so it aim us it in us. you know. no, it's not us. and like, the thing is, you know, if, if blacks are 14 percent of the population,

then if they should be in front of our eyes, roughly 14, the time is in all arenas. right? but i can, but i that because i tried that numbers, i can show you there, there somewhere between 35 and 55, but that's it. well, that's kind of yeah, that's kind of insane. and you know, i was thinking about, you may have seen this old movie, i think of, from the eighty's early ninety's called boomerang. eddie murphy was the star and it was an experiment. click on it was experimental, felt great movies takes place in an office. and without comment, everyone in the field is block, right? there's no, there's no, it's in an office. i think it's a legal office, but there's no clerk. sure why there's no, everyone's just black and the fact that their black isn't really central to the plot. it's just a world where everyone's a black american, it's cool, but it's an experiment. and that that is becoming what hollywood looks like. yeah, for real. and it's like that's not a correction. a correction is where you make the, you make pop culture. look,

the way that society, right? i said we both agree. there's something weird that the creating a world that doesn't exist and for some reason they're manipulating it. now, what is the cause, right? i, i, this is what, there's a couple of different things that we can talk about here. the 1st is, or the people in those professions who are in management and make the decisions. that's what they believe. in other words, they're likely is a majority of, or they're, a majority of people in hollywood for example, tend to be very well, very liberal. you know, i don't want to go into the work discussion too much, but they, they, they probably tend to be more gay. they probably tend to be living in a world that makes them want to do that. that might be one of the reasons you agree . i think that's part of it. i mean, you know, i saw a bill maher sketch, where he was talking about how, you know, there's, there's, it's very likely, if you're in like manhattan, where i live, or l a, where he lives, that, you know,

you'll know, a parent who has a, a transgender child, you know, not so likely if you're from youngstown, ohio. i grew up in the day right now. and there's something to that that world is more diverse. but i also think it's sort of a very corporate kind of way of looking at problems. it's like, it's sort of very simplistic. it's like, okay, well we, you know, someone from the d, you have your new ceo of d. i comes over, it tells you, you know, um, but, you know, see, you know, rick, we have this problem with our company. we are, we don't have nearly enough people of color, and so you think to yourself, you know, instead of thinking, okay, well we need to up that out. we need to increase that. you're like, okay, no more white hires. only bring in people of color stuff like it's like we don't have enough what you have and what much in your kids or their bosses know. you want to tell your story, that's about you what they want to make it about somebody else, because they don't think it fits they, they, they need to do it about that. by the way. those of you watching us around the

world and you don't understand the word the tech just used. it's diversity, a quality of what it, what are the, what's the last one? enclosure. and that's actually something now that has become part of a nomenclature for those of us here is the united states. if you work in a corporation that has become a sort of mand truck for your company nowadays. and i even have a little bit of a problem with that. not that i have a problem with either of those words. i have a problem with the fact that they're kind of creating quick mandating it, you know, well it's, it's the fact that it's so ham fisted and clumsy, right? it's a fish, it's like there's no grace to it. i mean, to be reasonable. you, you kind of have to say, well, ok, i mean look, people say life is not a 0 sum game and when it comes to employment and exposure it is um, every minute that i'm on.