to the says is already full of the my, the into the us, the time that so i'm intelligent service hasn't been present, a crane was here, and around, ross has voted to provide cubes and kind of did the weapons and finding us, i'm going to show report released by the new york times or so we'll just take another phone line panel of bottles. we'll find this week capital real via now it's the same thing for the box and the heads on richard. the job for freedom support is the size of gather outside the case. hi quote is legal to make some final effort to stop to whistle blows from being extreme. dive into the us, where he faces a 175 years in prison, exposing america proof that the secret the

skids of your company today for the latest global news, i know 5 months of money. this is on the international. we saw this news out. weston media has exposed washington spike games shining a smart light, thomas c. i is present in ukraine ever since. 2014 and the associate report. the new 5 says that the american intelligence agency have had doesn't secret bases near the russian border. of those and impulse and that ukrainian force is a part of a c, i a support a network of spied bases constructed in the past due to us that includes 12 secret locations along the russian border in a ca also help training new generation of ukrainian spice operating side, russia, across europe and in cuba and other places where the russians have a large presence, the new york times states. many details of this intelligence partnership are being

disclosed for the 1st time. the bombshell is at the c. i. a and other us agencies, provided intelligence for targeted missile strikes, the tracking of russian drones and troop movements, and support forced by networks. now, in over 200 interviews from current and former officials and ukraine's united states and europe, they describe this partnership that was literally built initially from this trust. they weren't sure. and then built up to a very key intelligence hub that surpassed more communications from russia. then they could actually handle now, according to the article, the united states intelligence apparatus said they did have some red lines that ukraine ended up crossing. the new partnership started producing so much more intelligence, blood pressure that it had to be shipped to language for processing. but the see i did have read lines, it wouldn't help through creating is conduct defense if lisa operations was the

distinction that created on the ukrainians. now because it, us and nato never admitted that they're fully fighting a war with russia. and the idea is that a proxy war has a hands off practice meeting that they can provide info, but they never are behind pulling the trigger, so they have to follow certain laws. now such an incident occurred in 2016 when lieutenant colonel boo down off at the time, let commanders across a narrow gulf and inflatable speed. both that landed in crimea in the middle of the night were rushing commander unit was waiting for them the ukrainians and fought the russians. and a uh, a russian supp fighters actually died, including the son of a general. then they uh, the ukrainians swam back to shore into creating and control territory. now this was a p r nightmare for the united states because it was a disaster and president put himself a two's ukrainians of committing a terrorist attack. and then promised to events the death of the russian fighters. meanwhile, obama, who was,

i'm the president and joe biden said this caused more problems and made things a lot more difficult. now, there was another case. one of mysterious explosion happened in john yes. occurring in an elevator, tearing explosives, exploding an elevator that carried a senior russian commander named arson. powell, who was known as motor roll. uh, let's hear a little bit more about that. a mysterious explosion through an elevator carrying the senior russian separate. this commander named arson, powell of noble, he's known the garret motorola, the ca, some learned at the assessments were members of the 5th directory. despite that they received ca training. some of the mr. obama's advisors were furious, but the ruling ducks the presidential election speeding donald j. trump against hillary, want him, clinton was 3 weeks away, and destination is continued. this goes back a decade under 3 very different presidents. you have president obama, then president trump and bite. and now donald trump, of course, did include anti russian hawks and key positions including a mike pompei o i. c i, a director, and john bolton,

his national security advisor. now it's crucial to point out that the new york times claims as the partnership and ukraine can be traced back to 2 phone calls at the night of february 24th of 2014. during, of course, the might on to the key of the permitting use by tape went to an office and called the c i a station shape and the local head of the and my 6 and ask for help in building the agency from the ground up and therefore, this 3 partnership, 3 way partnership was established as the partnership different of for 2016. the ukrainians became impatient with what they considered washington's on due caution and against agents as a nation, some other lethal oppressions which while aided the terms the white house bought the ukrainians, had agreed to if you read officials in washington, threatened to caught up support, but they never did. now this of course was all part of the victorian newland, jeffrey piatt apparatus during that time. that of course removed victory an accomplishment power and then of course initiated the might on qu. so this vindicates a lot of the people that said that the i was involved at that time. now another

point to mentioned really quick is in 2016, the c i a to begin training and it lead ukrainian commando force known as unit 2245 . they captured russian roads and communications gear. so that the c, i could actually reverse engineer this information and crack most because encryption system. they also then went onto train and use generation of ukrainians . fives, who operated inside russia, europe and cuba or other places that russians had a large presence. they train ukrainian intelligence officers out of spice, and assume fake persona is in garner information. this was called operation goldfish. we've seen a shift in the sentiment and us americans on the economic status of the united states while giving more money to ukraine. we've also seen russia succeed and it's military tactics of d, f got and also on the deal political stage. so what we're seeing is that, why is this happening now? perhaps they want to distraction, perhaps,

or try to distance themselves from another failed proxy word. and the time is it full reveals watching his agents and he is not totally on the route. so they'll call and say bucks. well, let's see. i also had a hand in his policies today, auntie correspondent and kind of bolden and just as well. the new report confirms what russian officials have been pointing out from day want that the us intelligent services are very entangled into the ukrainian forces and into the conflict in ukraine. the newer. busy it says that when the special military operation was launched by russia at that time, the c, i, a officials that were in ukraine, were operating out of a hotel. and every day they met with contacts at this hotel and carried out their operations. uh, got reports about contacts and networks that were being built bite whitehouse authorized by agencies to provide intelligence support for lisa operations against russian forces on ukrainian soil. is senior us official set of the c. i a sizable

presidents. are they pulling triggers? know, are they helping with targeting? absolutely. now the new york times report goes on to explain how us the central intelligence agency as well as m, i 6, the british intelligence agency. they both operated in ukraine and the lead up to the special military operation. building networks, training them to recruit source is to gather information, as well as build clandestine and part of the networks and in southern care send. these words has moved into action. murder, people that were accused of being collaborators with russia and helping target russian positions along with ukrainian forces. now it's also important to note that according to the new york times, uh, there was a meet, it convened in the hague, a secret on which the us central intelligence agency coordinated with other intelligence agencies throughout europe to kind of launch an anti russian front.

the representatives from the c, i frequence m, i 6, the a true off the dutch service, but critical intelligence, l i and other agencies the great to start pulling together more of the intelligence on russia. the results was a so good coalition against russia and the ukrainians were vital members of it. now it's important to know that the new york times, as well as other mainstream media outlets in the united states, are generally used by the sky it or what they refer to as limited hangouts, where they reveal certain information but not all. and with this report coming forward in the new york times, we can assume from this that this is just the tip of the iceberg as they feel and need to at least acknowledge this much activity. there's probably quite a bit more that has taken place. the timing of the report is particularly interesting as well, right? we have the a package in congress for ukraine that has failed to pass the mog or republicans and other. ready are holding up the aid package for ukraine requested by the us

white house. and this comes on the heels of information that former c i a director william burns, paid a secret visit to ukraine on thursday and was hurriedly reassuring ukrainian officials that american aid would come through. they would get the aid that was promised. however, not all of them found his words to be so reassuring. the question that some of you creating intelligence officers are now asking their american counterparts as republicans in the house way, whether to cut of billions of $1.00 and $8.00 is one of the see i will abandon them . it happened and it's getting some before. and now it's going to happen in ukraine as soon as your credit officer set, the acting us deputy secretary state victor. a new one said that she has strong confidence that the aid package will be passed despite the disagreements in congress between republicans, democrats, monitor republicans and others. we have to remember that the bulk of this money is going right back into the us economy to mix those weapons, including good paying job was in some 40 states across the united states. so that's

the beginning of the conflict. russia has made clear that this is not a fight between a solver and country and russia. this is rather a country ukraine that has lost its sovereignty and become a vehicle through which the united states and its allies can antagonize and threatened the rush. and after such a long period of these antagonisms rush, i felt it had no choice but to move in with its special military operation. this is what russia has been saying from the beginning. and this has been pretty much fully confirmed by this new report from the new york times for us in times office and has to all the little bows. don't carry out who believes there's a reason. the domain revelation is coming out. now whether the c, i a, is just advising the ukrainians, or advising and helping to implement the tax on russian targets along with the ukrainians. then the c, i a has to take it to the responsibility from these attacks, especially when,

when they're on civilian targets, accidentally or purposefully. i think we're probably gonna see a lot of denials, maybe even half part of denials. say oh, this article got so much wrong. you can't believe everything you read even though the new york times is one of the c. i is go to media outlets along. ready the washington post. if you look at this report, the, the authors say that they interviewed more than 200 people. so this is not a single source report where somebody told a fantastic story about the c. i a is 200 different interviews confirming what we all suspected all along. what did surprise me was the detail that it went into because usually this is the kind of thing that the c i a wants to keep quiet. and that led me to think that, that perhaps there's some domestic political message here that this may be

a warning to, to maggot republicans from the white house to say, look at this, look at this new york times article. it's taking us 10 years to build this presence in ukraine. it's taking us 10 years to cultivate this relationship. look at all we've accomplished and you want to throw it away by not by not appropriating money for the ukraine fight. i suspect that's why this was leeks, and if i could make one more point to oftentimes when the new york times the washington post create the pre relationships with intelligence officers that allow them to come up with these big stories on major cases. if the ca or the white house complained loudly enough, the, the new york times and the washington post leadership will killed the piece. and they didn't kill this piece. they've published it. so i think there's several

messages here. the light is on the thing from the russian defense ministry site and sudden cube attempted to carry out of service attack using to god doing this. also, it was about see, what is the i knew that that was taken out by russian defense as be full, reaching the target. meanwhile, russian forces are involved in the box so, so that i'm of the capture, the city to point in the affairs or region. that's important to the nation's defense. what is that in a report? so president puts, in good condition, the village of cranky has been cleared. our forces are standing all along the river bank. it's not just an observation point. our troops are stationed, they're operating at maximum efficiency. and some individual enemy soldiers remain on the left bank of the deep river. we are working on that they are being offered a chance to surrender this commons those days off. so russia announced that had gotten a big in the us for about a city that hadn't been on the totem queues forces for almost a decade. the muscle for the t location to many months before ending and the cubic

feet by planning forces addresses the bio field gains as soon as there is an increasing loss of faith among those believing queen cabinet. a much victorious fellow showed public support in the wes is increasingly favor in diplomatic solution to the off season. moving the cost of data that's been looking. i've been changing attitudes, it was keeps failing to make any progress on the front line. more and more people are losing face and ukraine and the less ability to guarantee ross's defeat. and so they're suggesting a logical conclusion to this, to your federal fiasco. a peace deal around 70 percent of americans wants the bottom of the ministration. suppose chic right to negotiate with russia, only 10 percent of europeans believe that ukraine actually stands that trends with as almost 40 percent one piece talks as well. the majority of ukrainians themselves

agree. 72 percent wants a diplomatic solution. now these numbers were very different. a year ago when everyone was search and for some odd reason that ukraine would when, however, things change, an average of just 10 percent of europeans across 12 countries believe that ukraine will win twice as many expect a russian victory this week, confidence in ukraine's chances of victory is visible all over europe, poland, portugal and sweden are the most optimistic countries, but even they're only 17 percent of respondents believe ukraine will prevail. and in sweden, 19 percent think russia will win. of course football and on the line, they know how much you are and the west i've sun to crane so far as they're not seeing any results from all those bailey and stuff could have been spawns at home. the old thing group you were being commission and the united nations covered the estimate that as of the just says, december 2023. the total cost of reconstruction and recovery ukraine is $486.00 bit

in dollars over the next decade, up from $411000000000.00 estimated to juan diego. what's also interesting is that if before russia was perceived as a top threats by 27 countries, now it's not even in the top 3 as well. countries a done focus on their own problems. given the absolutely critical dependence of ukraine on g 7, political, economic, and military support, this is worrying. it does not bode well for the ability of europe's political leaders to sustain the necessary public backing for continued aid transfers, voters in france and germany, for example, are significantly more concerned about mass migration and radical islamic terrorism . then putin's designs for ukraine, there is used to be a lot of talk about russia and lot of my boots and having to say phase, well, now the roles have been reversed, at least in the media. we're trying to figure out what is putin's off ramp?

where does he get off? where does he find a way out? where does he find himself in a position that he does not? not only lose face, but lose significant power in russia? the no window dilemma of doubling down on aid excepting a compromise deal scene is appeasement or facing the humiliation of a russian victory. zalinski may soon be forced out on account of the bloody battle loss of dave washington has long desired to bring about a change in leadership in russia. however, current developments suggest that a regime change maybe more likely in kia, of, than in moscow. losing up disco was a big blow and not only for kids, but also for its allies as it became clear to everyone that without their help ukraine can even hold onto its cities and will probably lose more as they can guarantee additional aid in time. but the west was sol, certain in the beginning,

even dreaming about was the change in russia for god's sake. this man cannot remain, wow. more able to see how much, what isolates in the russian region right now. because we need to do something economically, politically, and diplomatically, and what the impact on society are. and how much was seen potential regime change in russia. from our standpoint up until the point where the current regime is not in power, the country surrounding it will be to some extent in danger. not just putting but the whole regime because, you know, one might change booting and change his inner circle. but another pollutant might rise into his place. all the tables have turned everything changed. russia is highly unlikely, but a new crane very possible. the top commander has been fired. american money stalling, and the soldiers are getting desperate. the,

when the quote was, was low, he's losing the level of i've got one guy serving on the front line with the prospect leg up. so now what i've got soldiers with level to disability level and some or even level 3, somebody else. i've got a soldier with only one kidney, all school. what is left to do? well, hopefully a piece still can come to mind. it's just a matter of convincing the was to let go of control and ukraine and have to do what is best for its country and know what washington wants. and here's a suggestion. reassessing current realities on the battlefield in this way will undoubtedly be seen as appeasement. by some but the more fitting analogy might be that of west germany in 1949. and even more so of south korea in 1953. both of which needed to establish internationally recognized voters in order to establish sovereignty in the face of hostile neighboring palace. the challenge for ukraine

and its western partners is to establish the equivalents of the korean peninsula is 30 eight's power though. the main challenge for ukraine and its western partners is to force admit to themselves that this conflict is not going in their favor. so perhaps it's best to cut their losses and move on before driving the globe. and so world war 3, just because they didn't want to look like this sore losers for losses, farm is, is slammed. the bottom is obviously, it's a say, i'm a news congress, the only search to $1000.00 between troops being killed and the conflict. the fact is, the lands keys lying is realized by every citizen of ukraine festival, but every ukrainian soldier early as the president did not consider the russian speaking population of don't boss us. people now he has stopped considering the population of the remaining pulse of ukraine as people, threats. it's not 31000 ukrainian troops have died in this war so

that they also say they have a family that had information on ukraine's council. offensive overlays is laid out on his table well before it ever began. but those was one. the only loves going to attach he's going to want me to add to the i'll tell you frankly, i'll counter offensive operations. last thoughts were on the kremlin table before the counter offensive began. little mash summers, literally in the most live with the we're doing everything possible and impossible to make a break through. the 2024 plan is already in place. we do not talk about it publicly is powerful, it is strong. it gives not only hope, but it will give results in 2024. i might disappoint you, but what we do now is that he actually died of a blood clot as to the look of being at a key at the c. i never mind. they don't have them, this is all faults that we spoke with. and so i show consultant

o arise bits and pieces of n skis estimate is not in time for the relative i q is most likely in the last lot much during is counter offensive alone. a maybe a little bit yet woken up, yet from a dream. so he's obviously delusional. perhaps the need to just drop the 01. the numbers or flip flopped, the notes from russian cache and leaves to ukrainian casualties. but clearly now we, or maybe it's a budget issue, so i only claim $30000.00 until the max. and so i only pay a pay out to the families for $30000.00 soldiers. so it's a clearly, it's misplace, letting me know we have more casually than that just in the, in the recent counter offensive. so which is the complete the bottle. so it's, uh, yeah, it is. it's, it's the least. it's, it's, it's for political purposes solely and,

and he knows as the numbers are already very low. the actually provided real numbers. you'd probably be out next week, probably a better line saying before the counter offensive stuff. they had 100000 soldiers last. we have uh us assessments anywhere from $70000.00 plus um, russian assessments obviously around the $3.00 to $400000.00 intelligent sources. some more reliable and for intelligent sources. clearly do not support the numbers the most is the one steve saying, i'm not sure where he's getting numbers from or maybe he's him to try to to get them themselves. but it's, it's clearly is a is lying until the premium public. we've got the age limits, have been expanded, we've got women being brought into the service and, and we've got to just rounding up another 5 that works well. i don't think they're gonna be able to get 500000 but, and we're asking countries to send back to the port ukrainians in that in their

draft stages of back to ukraine. so why you have these measures? if you've only, if they've only lost the 30000, so the, the us state then. so i heard of all those of teamed up to impose sanctions on more than $500.00. so we're tablets as they handle another one. the responsive measures against some of them. yeah, so, so to contain nobody, several russian industrial sizes, but also stood positive for an entities u. s. department of the treasury's office of foreign asset control targeted 26 3rd country entities and individuals and 11 countries, including the people's republic of china, serbia, the united arab emirates, and linkedin stein wayside with the research of the millions sense of as soon as you can political consulting, he says that the science of the aim, that the real estate single russia, but much like the previous ones,

it will be ineffective. this is a conflict, what we call it an addition war. it is an addition to consume and may, could i share exhausted. it is not happening. i see because that is, you know, unification in the, in you towards the conflict between ukraine and russia. a 2nd thought this is a guest private company. it's not a guest, a g, c, c company or for either a foreign countries. this is a targeting private company. sadly, we convinced in our minds and hop that there's a conflict between ne, to and the sure. it's not our interest to involve for in, but some private company could get benefit from this. so the out of trying to find to find gaps between holes and, and, and, and, and, and to get the benefit,

the, the st. all who is the size remains in the most judges and the u. k. it's high, cool. and i've yet to rule on his final appeal against expedition to the us. so the final is wanted things aside from publishing secret movie. i'm diplomatic files if, because it's a new phase is a 175 years in prison, of the size. so this is gathered outside the pools in the police of the 52 old australian assigned to the people the feeling i'm well preventing him from appearing in the hearing on tuesday. and so i mean, i'm just doing outside the building a sort of thing that he is being persecuted for speaking. how pathetic the us pace is online. they say don't questing these lines because that will defend our online. they have

to admit that what they're doing is criminalizing journalism is personalizing literacy, and they're persecuting the journalist who expose the julia has over for 2 years in one form of incarceration, or end of youth. with all of julian's human rights suspended. are you good with so you this afternoon who are here to lose the rule? the legal come to us is the, is assigned to took refuge inside the ecuadorian embassy in london back in 2012 to avoid expedition to see him over sexual assault allegations where they dropped off

is a 5 and a say, this was the way i quit all in 2019, and he was arrested by british authorities and faced with an explanation request from the united states and has a low south in the belmont prison. while his legal team bustles to hand them over to the us as well as of amazing sight, as always is great to have good company. my colleagues, jessica taylor will be with you at the top of the hour. i think you own a very good the united states. it is a vassal states or the coalition against peace from ukraine to cause it is defined in ministration. it is against most of the world that historical wind is blowing against the west.

the hello, i'm the miller chan. you are tuned into modus operandi. it's the stuff of nightmares . for those of us working in the tv news business, a live broadcast was interrupted by master gunman taking the acres and staff hostage on live television. the viewers seeing it unfold in real time, that event and will matic of the spiral of cartel and gang violence. taking over the once peaceful country of ecuador allegations of corruption, tying local authorities and politicians to the crime sprees have civilians paralyzed with fear. today will delve into what's going on in ecuador, all right, let's get into the m o the.