the, the nato allies distance themselves from the idea of sending troops, zekia, of, as the french president says, he cannot roll out european boots on your premiums. so l mazda says my con doesn't realize the significance of what he's saying. the russian defense minister says russian troops have liberated 3 residential areas under the that's front and one week adding that ukraine in turn is using his remaining reserves to prevent collapse, plus instead of making a collective effort to de escalate us. some of the u. k. have chosen the forceful response process for administer warrens that continued violence in and around the guys that will create additional political and military risk in the region. you said that during a meeting with you, many time minister in moscow,

the, i'm rachel ruble live in moscow. you're watching our t international. we're covering the top new stories from around the world's natal chief in stilton burg says the alliance is not considering sending troops to you frame that comes amid reaction from russia to french president emanuel microns suggestion that there could be direct involvement in the hot conflict. muscular says such a move could lead to no good results. you know, we are well aware of mat cross position on the needs to inflict the strategic defeat on russia and so on. we have noticed the fact that the topic of sending troops kimberly crane wasn't discussed. we have also taken note that there was a very rich pallet of opinions on this matter. indeed, there was no consensus. okay, but the number of countries participating in the parents event remain sober in

their assessments of the potential risks of subtractions and the potential risks of being directly involved in a hot conflict. well, out of all the leaders of all the nato member states micron is the only one who's suggested this outlined. this idea that sending nato troops to crane to fight there is not off the table. a table gives us while everything was discussed this evening in a very open and direct manner. there is no consensus to day to officially openly and with endorsements and troops on the ground. but in terms of dynamics, nothing should be ruled out. we will do everything necessary to ensure that russia cannot win this war to book with us as foreign ministers certainly live, rob, explain the reasoning behind the shocking proposal as a means for the west to try and compensate for the lack of results that the ukrainians are seeing on the battlefield right now, but at any rate, a proposal like this is enough to set off alarm bells. but coming from the head of a major western state, it set the main stream media into a frenzy with headlines,

talking about potential world war 3 and wrapped in. and what about other european leaders? what are they being say? well, many of them are not happy about the tone of monday's meeting. we for example, heard from slovakia as prime minister who said that piece was not even mentioned they're like are just didn't put it was completely bull like meaning to support the war at all costs and to do everything you know, is it for the wants to continue i was very surprised that it was not a single was about any piece plan or piece of they should to. i can confirm that the all countries that are all ready to send their own soldiers to ukraine, all the say never so long case among them. they are also countries that say that this proposal should be considered all governments. this piece oriented rejection, the continuation of the war will not send weapons to ukraine and will focus on severely on projects of yep. will settle in that same realm of thought. we heard from hunger use for administer. who said that there

a flat outside that his country is not going to be under any circumstances sending troops to create this anti war message from slovakia and hungry comes as no surprise. what are we hearing from the other european countries in support of ukraine? well, even the more pro, key of figures, like germany's chancellor, the leadership of the european commission and even the secretary general of nato himself. they're all saying that they're not going to be sending troops to ukraine and many other nato states. or it's of that the very least saying that the block is divided on this outlanders idea. really, let's take a listen. what they said. there was a heated discussion about sending soldiers to you rain and there was no absolute mutual understanding on this issue. there are different opinions, but i want to emphasize that there are absolutely no such decisions. right now, we are busy sending advanced systems from sweden to ukraine in various ways. as many other countries are doing. it's a completely different matter. there is also no such demand on the part of ukraine

. this issue is irrelevant. i want to assure you that there is no question of sending european nato forces inside ukraine. an issue that for greece does not exist and i believe doesn't exist for the great majority of our colleagues. and let's trip to the average citizen here. don't old what has the reaction being from the french public to him across state. but because, you know, sometimes it's usually a disconnect between the leadership, what the leadership of a country wants and what the people want. what have you seen? well, it seems that people are just as afraid as the kind of fear we've been seeing. and these mainstream media headlines, a lot of stuff has been echoing between those headlines and what people are saying specifically talking about fears of world war 3, sending french ground troops to ukraine. but chrome is crazy, completely crazy. it would obviously be well with russia, world war 3, sending troops to ukraine would make us belligerence. war against russia would be madness. this belligerent verbal escalation by a nuclear power against another major nuclear power is already an air responsible

act. am i know the chrome explain vote, but it's our children's lives. he's talking about so callously. it's a question of peace over in our country now in terms of the actual idea of sending troops to ukraine, although there might not be consensus among european leaders. there certainly is a consensus among the general population across the west, but that consensus is absolutely against sending troops to ukraine. we've got statistics from polls here, sending us troops to ukraine. the people who strongly support that that's the only 6 percent of the population. well, strongly opposes 41 percent in terms of, of europe sending uh, troops to ukraine. support for that in germany is 13 percent. i mean the highest we have here is in sweden 33 percent, which is still extremely low. when you take the population as a whole, so there's no doubt that there's very little supports in the west among the general

population for starting a potential world war 3 in moscow says statements like this from the french president, raise questions about his adequacy, as a leader in commons to archie rushes, foreign ministry spokesman said paris should remember its own historical opposition to naziism. a beautiful white and what's 1st, just weeks ago, french president, my crown and his representatives, denied paris having any official role in recruiting volunteers or mercenaries. quite a few of whom were on ukrainian territory. and despite the facts presented by the russian side, in particular, by our investor in paris, the palace denied it in every possible way. then the french president says he is considering sending his military to ukraine is one of the options. the question arises as to the adequacy of people who mix up statements. but it seems to me that the problem is much deeper than that. it is that people who are running things in the e u in france now do not know,

and in the context of parents do not appreciate their history. i want to remind mr micron that there are other pages in francis history that would be worth paris turning to now and realizing in the 21st century. for example, the emergence and growth of anti fascist organizations. an enter french resistance to naziism during the 2nd world war, and the joining the citizens and all of civil society in france, in the fight against naziism, against the 3rd reich. when it was not an official trans in france, this is what needs to be done. now, to counteract the rise of naziism in ukraine, and we understand very well that enough facts have been provided to make even those who didn't want to believe it to now believe it so whose side is background on? what is this is ridiculous to attempt that hype to make a spectacular statement to gather more hits, or is it just disrespect for his own heroes, the heroes of france, who get their lives in the fight against nazi as i'm all right, let's get more on this story now from hyatt al her very academic,

an expert on media and politics, history and international relations. hi ed. i'd like to hear your thoughts on the french president's message and also that european leaders have rejected the idea of sending its people to fight and ukraine. what you think that says about you consensus on becoming involved in form? wards? yes. uh, basically this uh, uh, surprising the message, the order of speech just from uh, the friendship residence and it showed that to actually, uh, uh, the, uh, yeah, the defense policy, the dependency of the friendship policy towards, uh, the united states today. uh we know that uh the us benefitted from uh the looked in the sense of uh a. so you claim award. and this actually this page, this uh uh, stubs when we can more that you will be in states of wood. but in the age of the

relations of the european states, uh, with a shop and other uh, its allies. and uh, we know that uh, actually, uh, the, it'll be in the continent, the suffering from economic the conditions. so i need a solution in your pm policies towards the ukraine. the green and water would need to hold complications on the, on the political level and on the economic level. and also on the diploma to go relations with russia. to say again, to see that this will lead to more weakness of the european continent. and we know that uh, throughout the ukranian war of to know a few years ago to now. and i believe that the, the decisions of the policies of the european states are or inflection of the us policy. and this actually is we can get it states lost their own,

lost their badge of one to come forward. if the a flash president is trying to gain control or to have some political games, actually this will lead to more distribution of the, the national 650 or fast and beautifully in the space. and also would save the way for more conflicts. and also in the european states. uh, it says, not all the uh, civility for it would warranty, you know, how you were saying your opinion leaders distance themselves from backgrounds, points. but last october, there was a similar situation when the french president proposed creating an international coalition to fight hamas and nobody actually supported that. let's take a listen real quickly to what he had to say. then simple, quite a policy puts, this is why france is ready for the international coalition against i ash, to which we are committed for our operation, any rock and syria to also fight against home us. i am proposing to our

international partners, as i discussed with you this morning, the, we build a regional, an international coalition to fight the terrace groups that threaten us all the on this and then. so what, why do you think mr micron suggestion did not find large support among western colleagues? because i think that's a different to open space. they are aware that of the i'm situations of the payment would on the security of their stage of the countries as well. as the economic relations and they know that they are, it's a weak us to, if you want the weakest part of this a whole uh more. we know that the u. s. is trying to defeat it ash off in order to a degree is it's a role in the woods, jani, uh, shaw, straight and guess who uh, its influence in the front the and the reason he didn't look for examples and also in the different places of the word and they are the u. s. as trying to and this

influence of this policy, what this aim is that the implemented, the direct needs busing to the open space. so basically, i think the should be aware by now that they be used as a tool for the us, the interest of the mike at all, it's clear that my cloth since the last 2 and maybe or before. and you said to me it was, he said, and live on he said a and also in that you can at this failing now with his adjustment and also the guard didn't get how much. uh today it was we want if we look at the, the national understand the experience and the, the, the us use of the states as well as it's dark stuff, few occasions on you look at, i guess that a given the funeral for our a with,

or should learn the lessons, should have know that that's, that's the one on who to do the policies. uh, at least on the, on a gaze. what's totally against the foundation of the european union. today the european space show the costs of the policies. and they or this, this is part of why they are not the also is just about the, the, don't the decisions or suggestions because this will lead to more conflicts toward the vision and to more economy good you productions. so how do you think these statements reflect on microns image as the leader of a key european country? so i don't think that would hurt because uh, as i mentioned that just mentioned. now my goal is he is suffering from internal an intensity from a different a, a c cause a ton of decisions. he is weak internally, he is going to gain popularity especially that we know there are the evictions

coming in and the stress. and we know that the 9th wing is gaining popularity due to this failure. so he was trying to get in or play it, or to re establish or recreate the additional number of french and. ringback especially in the region, i believe that he would not succeed even succeed before, and he will not to today, given his again his mission or his experience and live on the i'm, we know that the creation of the looking any of the, one of the reasons was to underwood add to create different i'm, i think he made shows up to try to solve a crisis of conflicts with diplomatic relations. what is going on is the, the, i gave the basics of the european union and the fast, unfortunately, throughout the year as built any dependence of us. suppose we cannot somebody to be speech at toward. so you paid today with the steps as you mentioned, for,

for example, in 1st time today we, uh, we are seeing the same concept mode division mod escalation for the war, more a enforcement to end the war at the expense of the nations with the actual relations with states and also the inter, not turned on the interest of the states. all right, well, if they're hired l hurry, academic, an expert on media and politics, history and international relations. thank you. thank you. thank you so much. i. so the russian troops are strengthening battlefield positions on the don't as friends . and after the successful capture of, of the, of the, of coast city, they have liberated 3 more residential areas in one week. total personnel losses on the print inside have far exceeded 400000. and according to the russian defense minister, she was already in during the russian special military operation. the ukrainian armed forces have lost a total of more than $444000.00 service members. after the failure of their

counter offensive, the ukrainian military command is trying to stabilize the situation and prevent of the collapse of the front at the expense of its remaining reserves. well, the russian defense minister was talking about the recent games made by russian troops down in ab d. s. good in particular. and he said in general, russian troops have been getting more control of the don't ex region. he talks about the size, the controlled and said since the beginning of 20 towards full. so just this year, the russian troops have been able to take an extra 327 square kilometers of territory. just to put you in to context. what that means that is larger than the size of an ease state, that is the space to malta. he also talked about of ukrainian dead saying that soldiers, they were laughing at losing more than $800.00 individuals on a daily basis on average. and therefore, as you heard and not quite,

russia was estimating the total loss of ukrainian sold as is some 444000 individuals since the source of the conflict backed in february 2022. that is very different to what we heard from ukraine this week. president uh, zalinski saying that the law says was 31000 individuals. i'm but it's not just the washer that saying that there's a huge disparity here is actually the figures are a lot higher. we heard from the washington post back in 2023 saying it had sources within the us government that was already pushing the losses of recording and soldiers and around a 170000. so you can see that there was a huge difference to what you claim is pushing out it towards po, please, the reality on the ground. what we also heard that this was the 1st time that the russian troops, i'm unable to take out, the american outcomes told. now it's too long list of military equipment. the

russian soldiers have been able to obliterate on the front lines. even the bag in under the administrator and i'm as some what i need to, to the fact that the numbers are incredibly low for 1000 compared to what the defense ministry is saying. here is 400000. what all the topics did he report on? they also talked about the threats coming from potential nuclear missiles we heard reported in the u. k. just in the last few days that the us could be putting new to our missiles back on u. k. territory. once again, if it does so, that will be the 1st time being 15 years. they have been us and you see and myself on you, kate territory. and the defense minister also talks about the of the threats that are being faced at the moment. because you are just as of now, the actions of washington, which is building up its nuclear potential on the territory of the european countries. and deploying advanced means of delivering nuclear charges,

are provoking radiation, chemical and biological threats. in addition, the united states has formed a network of biological labord tories to study the properties of pathogens and the particular region that can be transmitted to humans and to cause pandemic. out of 330 such facilities around 40 are located inside ukraine. he also talked about the issues in the south pacific saying the need to have increased its exercises in the region, and also its presence in the region the and said the as a result rusher is having to do what it needs to do to protect it. see, eastern board is pushing for for those. the washington continues to use the rising 10 sions on the korean peninsula and in the area of taiwan island as a pretext to expand the presence of its military forces in the western pacific ocean. this year,

the scope of joint exercises between the united states and this allies is expected to increase due to the military potential of nato member countries for persons to as well as a result of that there will be increased equipment put down into the eastern old. so they will be more training of preservice in the east and rush will also be carrying out international missions with several countries, including a loud vietnam and india. the escalating situation in the middle east has led the discussion between the russian foreign minister and the many prime minister in moscow on tuesday. sorry, i love rob express conviction that the many cities showing of commercial vessels and the red sea was largely a consequence of these rarely palestinian conflicts written. you know, we do not condone to showing the merchant ships, but we also cannot justify the aggressive actions that the united states and the u

. k. are taken against the chairs are of the republic of yemen, under that pretext, without any international mandate in the form of a un security council resolution that did not allow it to report minutes as i grade level over the course of the last 3 months has issued statements highlight of his position, but more problem of highlighting bosco's position on this matter. a letter stating that the united states, along with the united kingdom are currently defined international law. and of course, to an extensive right versus probably not be i'm the point of moscow that the united states, that'd be nice to have some means to justify intervention. that the intervention cannot be military intervention more so it can include the bombing of the stage or the southern states as well as the people, particularly young man that has been in the comes from a contract for the better part of the decade. which really highlight some of the kinetic german pricings over that period as well for ministers that grade level and that the money problem is on the but it kind of discussed a number of possible outcomes. i didn't get many satisfied with things like no for

this law. this is what page. uh, you know, many try me to so how does it pull them in? i thought for us, we support so kind of study and people say have the right to have their own independence stage with the capital in east jerusalem. and we will work in this direction to mitigate the consequences of the humanitarian disaster that we're now witnessing happening. that there a double standards applied to this situation, then we in the m and a taking a class stance in regard to the palestinian issue. and we shared the russian approach to this issue for this. this is best optimum. that hasn't been issued over the course of not just the last 2 months, but over the past 2 years or even longer, back to the united states or the collected, wes hasn't been involved in some sort of double standard. we're double sandra suggested that i took the nightstand at any given time is by without the theme do force of international law or to your why security council carrier strikes, leaving the wage war against staves. so the united states and its current position

turning out these attacks would not necessarily benefit the people of young man or the state of the not for the most part, wouldn't even put in funds to this conflict variable, the man to big through the stands. but in that sense, the, who's the say that's the policy and policies are the most important cause i'm, unless sides solve badly, we cannot talk about a piece of bill or a stop or section of activities. but most certainly is the russian position on the model is involved as a samsung washer is currently acting as a mediator. despite the impressions from the united states and we cannot contain them, trying to ensure that this conflict does not spill over to send out your students are getting nothing for minister. we never finish that if we have only warrant that continued violence e n around the gather street will create additional political and mail to risk in the region. but instead of making a collective effort to de escalate the us, somebody u k. have chosen a forceful response. so here level is less than one, issued a statement suggesting that the united states or the collective,

less physical interested when they go shooting. and that statement, who said that, according to these dynamics and the names of these dynamics. so it'd be a general sense of the west has been extremely negative, is getting worse or truly suggest die. so the less the, how interested in the go shading and that this because potentially slow roll off and, you know what works before i let say no better than of the 2nd congress of the international risk. the file movement in to form on global multiple. i already have kicked off and moscow representatives from over $130.00 countries are taking parts right. i enjoyed now here in the studio by ahmed eustace. i'll address the founder of future new order form. great to have you on with us. you've taken part in the rest of files international from that brought together delegates from over a $130.00 countries, as i mentioned. can you share with us some of your impressions of the event this my pleasure to finish the same thing to moscow and also to your channels rush it to the i love it so much. and really in the forum,

we are here to talking about the mouth, the other 2. and we, i am as a researcher and analyst and future i think are concerned about with this for many years and how the will it will change with multi blotter to me. in my uh, uh, forum and in my research we are considering about multi disability thinking to understanding that action mentality and also the egyptian mentality. that option, you mentality and addiction human body. it means a techno science fake thinking. it means it means that physics thinking it means future thinking and separate shell also uh, confused business. so um, we have a new project in a life meant to our well it really,

it really it really i like the russian at the, to the now uh uh to uh, bring the oil it with the new theater. right. and the new civilization talking about the variety and the availability of culture, g politics and respect the right that you might have to. yeah, i was seeing the term or is the file all over social media today. and i thought what, what a great thing to discuss because it's not something you hear about often, especially in the west. how important do you think it is for events like this to be organized them for people to attend them? i saw a but many nationalities, many multinational to here and, and most go about the this for them. and we, together at try to be, again, is to the globalization again as to that, uh, wisdom size. we expect that western is fine,

but it's not only the lifestyle we can live with it. we have many varieties, i come from egypt, big civilization, big groups and we have also a future vision. so we as egyptian, as african let the know as the a russian, a chinese, i've multi lingual, multi nationals. we can now talk in a new pick and daniel mind. so i have also my initiative is good. the last vic, the imagine out of the quote is means the brain. okay, so what does that take of bring? what the new picked of our brain. yeah. what, what are your thoughts on what the west calls freedom of speech, but then at the same time, pouting freedom of speech, but then censoring or banding. uh, tv channels such as r t on not just um, centering r t, but also on social media. what, what, what, what can, what do you think about that hypocrisy?

okay. i didn't go through with this is angles my mind and go to a new country is fitness, new leaders, and you and you knew wisdom through eh, eh, and flu on a new understanding of ourselves on the other resistance. not go through the use only for a freedom and the and human rights like the american style. we had respect to the american people for sure. but also we respect our mind. and so our mind talks about new tech. it's good, maybe a maybe not old. maybe i'll special intelligence, maybe the growth of a new kinds of a science. it contains past 3 philosophy, the physics modify ecology eh, and new in life meant by this. we so do politics also in our lives. now,

at the mileage wave metaphysics with psychology, with spiritual, with civilization, not only the hollywood or american starch, nothing only of this way. we have no new applications of life. so what is the rest of the world, particularly the global south? think about this and that relationship with the west. i mean, how can the to work together? yeah, i am concerned about the global citizen, the if it's a blog of south, lots of global south. i don't know. but a my point of view, we are now going to, is that what happened in the world? we are now in a big throne for a transform mission. look only digital trends formation. it's an environmental transform mission. it's climate advance formation. it's maybe up in the skies.