or the any rock and the serial and yugoslavia they would know decisions of the un security council. the united states released this team and from the bottle itself. and when rest of began to protect its people in doing that, why is this thing not allowed for other countries? right, there are a lot of important kohls out of washington parts, hypocritical, double stand up foreign policy during the closing press conference at the will you text of the head of the i. e, a speech to r, t and savvy has a un monday to investigate. did is teacher teacher a tax on isn't that photos a nuclear power plant and there's pavement comes out the meeting is not letting me put in solving the russian city of search. that's happened now. my reaction would

be very different, because now i have on monday to look into this, to ask questions, to try to determine what has happened, the least fama is reportedly break into the national parliament during valid protest against the policies that they say crippling their industry. the kind of welcome to all the international reaching you live from my new center in moscow. i a michael caught you up with the updates. now the world, yo festival has wrapped up in solid in russia. at the closing ceremony, russian president vladimir put in, took in a month to washington for its double stand at foreign policy. so younger steps might that the school took. united states failed to cope with the burden of

responsibility. they created the monopoly and began to strengthen the routing it needs soon faced the fact that the vast majority of the countries do not really like it. everyone so that the resistance to the emerging world order was growing problems and failures began. even the allies don't like it was name of shashir, but they are afraid to say too much. the ruling elites of the united states decided that they did not need the old system of world relation. the balance in the world has changed and they have decided to rebuild the world order for themselves in iraq, syria, and your best of you there with no decisions of the un security council. the united states released this genie from the bottle itself. and when russia began to protect its people in don't best, why is the same not allowed for other countries? latham valencia had on the press conference, the russian presidents also gave

a rousing speech at the festivals. closing ceremony of event welcomes $20000.00 people from across the globe that are seeking to promote. busy of cooperation and put in spoke about the importance of improve in the world for the future benefit of roles. so let me explain the differences. there is something that united says in russia, we call these our tradition of value. second, this is the foundation of our life. something that we always have in common. we are all equal from the moment we are born, thanks to our mother and father. this is how people are born. there was no other way. even with modern technology. you when you were all born equally? here comes the question. oh we growing up developing equally unfortunately. no good . there are no equal conditions in the world for everyone. and that is the main injustice of today's world. is it possible to secure equal conditions for everyone

to grow and develop? we don't know those and these 3 needs. but what i do know is that we should all strife with even the very fact of striving to make the world more democratic, more stable email and in safe, which would probably be r d sat down with the head of the international atomic energy agency for exclusive interview after he'd met, we'd like to me put him in the southern boston city of searching. raphael grozis spoke about general security of is that photos and you'd be a pop planned at how the united nations has helped prevent the additional attacks. that beside adding that he now has a monday to the investigative such as does this happen again? you're just coming here from your meeting with president put in. can you please give us some details on the issues that we discussed with him while it was a very important conversation for, for us? and for me personally aesthetic the general of the and the reasons are obvious. of

course, there are many topics the situation around the security and the safety of face approach and cut power plant, which is, you know, at that say top of the security concerns. so the only for the agency, i think in general were white. people are very worried about that. so and i was a just a few weeks ago i was again head for the full time as you know, visiting the plan through king at the situation they are trying to have my own impressions of boys going on there. and i had an opportunity in keith to discuss suite, to present savanski solely to us indispensable for me to come to russia, to express my opinions of what i saw. my our impressions from a technical point of view and authority. some from the, from the president that,

from the russian government does have a really good moment because unfortunately, i said the promise i must say it for continues. and so for as long as there is a military conflict, the possibility of a new pair accident is still there. and we must make sure that there is maximum restraint in this regard. so that we avoid that situation. there was also, uh and i said it, it'd be full that they were supposed to be the do to discuss with basically and put some other issues on the international version that that's have a bearing on uh, the nuclear nonproliferation gene, for example, of which the i e h, this guide you, if you want a issues where russia has historically played an important role, for example, when he comes to iran and the new cap program over there. and other things in the,

in the middle is so he was a reach discussion. as i said, i need to spend simple one for me. so let's start with this approach. can you click power plants, as you mentioned, that it's really press pressing issue nowadays. so this is that was your 4th visit to the nuclear power station. what is the main difference between the situation there? do you and your 1st visit and what your so now when the 1st visit was in september 2022. and at that time, if you remember, there were still direct pitts attacks on, on the side, on the block. so this information was quite dramatic and, and reaching a point that would be unthinkable and having a nuclear power plant as a target in immediate combat. so, and of course we were confronted with a situation that we didn't know how we would evolve. i was trying to establish

a permanent presence a by the agency from the agency there. um, so there were many um, uh, problems to solve for the together bureaucratic technical so that. busy like opening the gates for us to be there to try to start a work, which is basically one of the support technical support and white, much say it to assess the extent of a deterrent of something bigger and more raised and more serious happening there. so that was in and, and now of course, the situation has evolved in this sense that we have established these presence there. so many things have happened in terms of the technical situation of the plant. the plant is now complete,

shut down, which means that it is not operating or producing energy. and it is also, there's also a new situation because pressure has establish a new structure around it. and so we have to deal with these things in a different way. and some times colleagues of yours in other parts of the world asked be, well, do you think that we a better now than we were back then or, or not? and frankly, and, you know, i don't, i, i don't avoid questions i, that's not by style. but what i say is that it would be very difficult and perhaps even improved in for me to say, well, better now, because that is, i mean it's a conflict going on. so what he's ok now 10 hours later or 3 hours later or 2 minutes later go could change if there is a mini heat, is the shelling or if that station looses external power supply,

it doesn't get quoting function and then you can have a cascade of events that going into the area of an accidental and we are where to start and each there, the channels of diana, which are way to stop as i, as ahead of the feeling that i have the attention of the government of ukraine. of course, i just finished my conversation with the president of the restroom to the nation. so as an international organization trying to have time to contribute to the seventy's ation of education. i think we are very sorry to be there from that to say everything is fine. i wouldn't say it, but there are good elements. so we are able to to our technical work to have interactions which are concrete,

very concrete. and not only at the plant with the management of the band, but also here today i was having before seeing a present value. me 14, i was discussing with the a we did that in the general of the estate company. rosa told it'd be so alex a good shift and she's team or so with the presence of an important litigation of the ministry of foreign affairs of the residence of the nation. the russian nuclear regulator pro sticking up sorta and also represent ethics of the ministry of defense. so we could go through the entire agenda and these are indispensable. so i can raise with them specific issues. i'm get the i've use so we are working. we're working hard, so as for the i a, a, your position. what are your suggestions regarding the safety of this new clip up on what should be done as for you to guarantee it's safety at this terrible. in

fact, there are 2 limits that 2 levels. one level has to do with the physical integrity of a plant. let me put it in very, very, very simple terms. for your audience. never attack a new cap. our plant, more importantly, don't turn a nuclear power plant into immediate database there by making it a target. this is something i brought to the united nations security comes back in may last year. establishing the 5 basic principles i mentioned, the 2, which are the most important to us now. and i think these by and large is working, or because the international community not only must call and, and keep, or whomever. and the international community has a very clear sense of what has to be done or not very clearly. so that is one day mention prevent the worst. and the 2nd is more

dense, perhaps less attractive in a conversation like this. but it has to do with many technical aspects of what is going on there, how we insure the according function. you remember that there was the blow up of the nova kickoff got done in june last year, if i remember correctly. and so these old tarts completing the levels of the deeper river from which the blonde was thumping. i was out for recording, so there's been a lot of work there. the agency is interacting, i mean, a number of things which are indispensable. so that we have a relatively stable situation, but we see uh we see the ceiling ongoing shimming of the nuclear power plant. and since one can you do you do one precedence the landscape person a few crane about the potential consequences of bullying. the nuclear object

is where my message, i think everybody's aware of, of a forty's at stake here. and my function here east can tenuously, control the attention of everyone about what it, what is at, at risk. we know that in, in, you know, in a war situation, the unexpected may happen simply because he's not a conversation. a russian of conversation between 2 people like you and me. now, this is a physical confrontation of wheels, not for waste. you will find this russian out of space on things gonna happen, but i, i can assure you that i am very clear when i speak with everybody about about this . so i am confident that they are, that they are hearing us. but of course, until this ends and it ends without a new get accident,

we keep a, you know, our prudence and we keep our efforts alive. and to months ago, you said that i a has not collected enough evidence to state who was conducting the ceiling. although to most of the experts, the trajectories, at least are quite old verse. but so what data i a is still missing. what about the data provided by the russian? whether it's all on these, let me tell you something which is very important. first of all, that seems we established in the 5 basic principles of the un security council that hasn't been a direct showing on the prompt itself, i think was the case before. so if that happened, now, my reaction would be very different. because now i have a mandate to look into this to ask questions to try to determine what has happened before. that was not the case because the i

use the caps or how that simply a new pair safety security remedy, which was more, which was narrower and more simple. now we have said the i a is going to be looking into the 6 and to the extent possible to indicate what has happened that have been some mine or it be so dangerous. i would say in terms of perhaps some cro drones a heating and that a go dar, which is the village near by the brand might on those we haven't been able to gather, you know, we are apart from any of these. we are a group of things, pictures, and when we pronounce ourselves, it must be on the basis of our own independently gathered information. if i don't have enough, i can have a hypothesis. so i do have like many people have,

but i cannot say this has happened or point fingers when i don't have or the limit to my hands to say this is clearly the source of the attack. i think here at the end of the day that is clarity on what are the consequences of something like this . and these is what i keep saying. what do we have the information, for example, that's happened test a few days ago for those sort of we would, we have been saying, when do we have the information intelligence information or any of the information that that are meaning that the possibilities that there could be meet the movement, we, we ring the alarm bell and we say attention, we are watching. nothing should happen. and we are trying to play a deterrent role in these who got no preference, maybe, but much better than nothing. i cannot help asking you about the equipment 4th uh, 8500000 euros. that you provided a i a provided to this,

i promise. can you put problems? are there a mechanisms to ensure that these money actually goes to where it should go? yeah, indeed. as, as, as you write the mention of, 1st of all, the desktop, the money, this very important what we get from countries that are willing to do so we get equipment normally safety equipment for nuclear power plants, not it, not as operators you. uh, but the other reason as of all of the nuclear power plants to exactly the they are not probably the best, i'm sure know which because of the war and because of the alteration of the, of the supply chain, which is not flowing as in peacetime, is not in short, so we are channeling these eh, into the facilities where they need one or the other thing so at,

and we as an international organization that have heavy, i would say efficient all the system to avoid that there's any abuse. we are very careful about these things. so from what we know at the moment, there is a shortage of employees as a, as a promotion nuclear power plant. have you discussed the plans of diverse considerations to high of more personnel? so this new clip, whole time we have, we have looked into this and of course my impression is that the situation in terms of this stuff is relatively correct. and that i'm more of a recruit pence ongoing. but then again, i should say that the situation is, and it's a satisfying for us, so long as the brand easy. this shut down situation where he's not generating power electricity. is it where to start again,

then perhaps the needs in terms of uh, the technical personnel would be different, but this is something that about which we still need to see what, what's going to happen, the demand of minutes. so if you credit or fan is your feel crane, who said that is important to withdrawal russian troops to ensure the safety of the nuclear power plant? do you think that these moves would ever really secure the safety of the nuclear portfolio plant will have completely opposite the results? well, i wouldn't put it in those terms. i think that this is, of course i need to go statement that has to do with the conflict. you know, you know why their sense. i cannot imagine that there would be such a isolate, to move uh, from the russian federation, without a wider agreement. we own, you know, i'm at the moment i'm, i'm on that works for peace. i hope that we will collectively find the right path

towards that the ends of poland. now, where farmers protesting in the nation's capital, the reported they broke into the parliament building, some of the demonstrators was seen clasping with the police. the spare has been the wave of protest by i will control work as throughout the european union in recent months of the outrages focus to new environmental regulations that fall nice say ok about crippling the industry. all these farmers are seeking a bad on cheap imports and drain from neighboring ukraine, carries what some of them have to say. yeah, me, that's good either something has changed or it has changed for the worse. the us started to impose its ideology on us and today it's the farmers. this applies to farmers, for example, the climate revolution. this climate package, green energy,

and green order, which someone will introduce unfortunately, will destroy polish farms across the gold products know totally from ukraine, but also from outside europe, the stabilize our economy, and will lead farm is to bankruptcy. that is why there is such great outrage not only in poland, but throughout europe, pharmacy a great threat that their farms are at risk and that they will simply have to stop producing enough. i go to the area of my colleagues, charlotte dimansky spoke about the developments with argy correspondent, mar enough to sort of, and stephen gauge a professor that used to teach of european studies in bell grade homeless farmers have had enough, they can no longer take this at their own expense at all started of course, last year, when polish farmers started protesting sort of complaining and saying that, hey, all the seek, cheap, ukrainian grain that is entering and flooding. our market is messing with our livelihoods and we cannot make ends meet something needs to happen. and during this

time, there were also complaints that ukrainian grain was being dumped from trucks and from frames. and in the polar side, with cultural minister, had to apologize and justify his citizens action saying, well, there guys were tough economic times you have to understand them as well. and then we have the prime minister of poland saying that up have squared looking into temporarily closing the board. or even we're talking with the ukranian side about temporarily closing the border and closing trade. and i will also talk to polish farmers about this. and such a solution would be temporary and mutually painful. we are the most pro ukrainian states, but we also have the biggest problems in all of europe resulting from the russian ukrainian war. the price of free trade with ukraine is too high, and we can't pay it back. here's what's interesting is that you have donald task asking european partners to understand polish farmers concerns here at the same

time you have let them are as well as cosign, know, we understand that it's tough for a polish farmers, not only polish farmers. i'll get to that in the 2nd, but he wants polish farmers to understand that they need to suffer for the time being for the sake of ukraine, which of course, it's tough to explain to people that can pay their bills. we must finally find a solution to the situation on the purchase board item on which is going to be on both economics and morality alone go. it is simply impossible to explain how the hardships that they believed in country can be used in domestic political struggling. at the same time, there's only so much that people can go on support and ukraine add their own expense. you know, it's definitely sort of for you in to the conversation at this point. how much of a problem has this been across europe in terms of this cheap grading coming in and, and the cutting the farm is with the farmers protest. so it's a problem that was brewing for some time now, even before the escalation of conflict in eastern europe,

they are very significant because uh, not the only bullish citizens, but citizens across europe are sick and tired with the war and are thinking tired with this totally terry own style of single minded view on the ukrainian conflict and their costs of the expected to go with the narrative . that is, that is that is given and to positively sacrifice for god knows was for things that are very far away from their interests of citizens. for, for the interest of their countries and so on. so i do think that this is going to continue and that this protest will, of course cause a chain reaction in honor european countries. marina, um, just want to bring you back in. how about the you? they oversee the, the proponents of this policy of introducing at 2022. basically when you create conflicts started, they scrap the tariff saw new queen goods that would transiting to and not was this

accumulation. as you describe the serial products, flooding the market and cutting the local farm is price is causing these problems. how is e responded full so far? it hasn't really done much. well, they are the ones who started this to begin with when they changed their easy regulations. in particular, the agreement between the european union and ukraine, they completely removed all restrictions when it comes to ukrainian truck drivers. and this is the, the restrictions for drivers transports and goods between the crate and the european union. so this is not only effect and colon, this is affecting the whole block, which is why we've seen protest in other countries, not just fall in all these farmers in, in the you are saying, hey, we need a solution because something needs to happen. this is an unfair advantage for ukrainian farmers. yes, they're struggling right now. but at the same time, we are struggling those bonds, something needs to be done. this is the latest when it comes to the you. there are statements made options for southern the best way would be to support you great in transit. it tends to run support to see ports and sun products to countries where

ukraine has always traditionally sent its products. what we need for these is a positive approach from ukraine and some cooperation, o ukrainian partners must understand the situation of all fall, most no markets kind of stand such a level of supply increase for rough shaw this is once again another samples house . the wes puts its own interest over the interest of its own citizens and we've seen this time and time again and we've heard today from arrears, a harv on the foreign ministry spokesman, who basically reiterated that and said that this is something that we see from the west the time and time again, with a good idea on for 2 years they talked about food security, about the need to feed the poorest. it was said by the countries of the european union, nato and weston countries, which includes poland payable, and now they demand exactly the opposite. products to be slowed down. not allowed

blocked in the ukrainian ones, and not allowed to come to them. but this is not even hypocrisy, this is a position in the medical aspect of the wood. this is a position which can you please call this. what is happening to farmers and the countries of the european union is provoked by the regimes in those countries. but they cannot admit this because otherwise they will need to admit not just the wrong this of the course. this is very important, but the maliciousness which uh, of course, when it comes to washington, it's really far away from the plants of european farmers. so perhaps it's, they don't really care about this, but when it comes to the e. u, again, they should have seen this coming all along. so this is where the question arises. what were they thinking and what were the plans of either the thought that this would be over very soon so far, where their farmers would it be affected? or that's all that will be effective, but somehow they'll manage, which is just ludicrous stable and friendly. that's

holly india is. foreign policy chief has some dump relations with russia, amid the ukrainian conflict. everyone conducts a relationship based on past experiences. if i look at the history of place, the independence india, russia has never heard of our interest. we've always had a stable and very friendly relationship. and our relationship with moscow today is based on this experience. the western powers have been urging new daily to change. it stands towards russia, but india has spilled 5 minutes neutral status. despite the difficulties of balancing its financial interest with its international obligations, as books passing of the routing b j party outlined the car in stance. the rush, appreciate his student and know, you know, face all the lives of the biggest rush. yeah, we did for india, india for russia, the halls stick to the starting from defense starting from investment in hydro

problems, a start date, strong investment in place, starting the up into a while for us. yet. the important point in this is when the foreign policy is made up, russia older lady, mary, in boston, please edi. i will not be any pressure from our list in board. he does not see any certificates or dictations from the rest of the work regarding it's at a time with russia or any other kind of default that might be able to continue to do engage with russia to explore photos. text is all in eddie ohio calling off the truly of defense, which has been really for a long time. one while i saw i saw on corrected on that it's just that sometimes one of the she does come across headlines. you see west and politicians check new tally to put pressure on most go to end the conflict. but i do specifically want to ask you about a new daddy's position a.