[000:00:00;00] the, the russian states never as tight as i'm one of the most on screen, the best most all sense of the, in the 6595 and speed. what else calls question about this? even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on the rush of funding and supports the r t. suppose next, even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube tv services. for what question did you say? even closer to

the 1834 prance invaded algeria and straight away the french started inhabiting it to strengthen their position. the column is known as the new are the best land from day one. the local population was put into an unequal position and was briefly exploited. this caused them as discontent. the people of l g area began their long term bite for independence. in 1954, the banner of freedom was raised by the national liberation front. a guerrilla war

against the occupants broke out. the french tried to separate as to rebuild you in using cruel measures. whole villages were wiped out acts of georgia and executions of civil people including pregnant women, children and old people took place more than 3000000 people were born into concentration camps. however, these punitive measures didn't help. cl, jerry and patriot managed to induce france besides these negotiations. in 1962 heavy and the cords were assigned 40 l. jerry on the bass towards the independence . but this was achieved at a colossal price. algeria by rights is considered to be a country of martyrs. according to the calculations of historians, the french colonists are responsible for the debts of one and a half 1000000 algerians.

the . the bad. hi everybody, i'm rick sanchez, and i'm here to tell you that after being a journalist and a news presenter for 4 of the biggest networks in the united states, it's time for some context and for some truth telling. and in that vein, here's what we're going to be talking about. number one, why are soldiers not patrolling new york subways? and what does that say? number 2, china tells us tech companies that out. is it getting mad or is it getting even number 3, why is alana zelan scott? the 1st lady of ukraine in case you didn't know snubbing 1st lady jo biden's invitation to sit with her at the state of the union address for me. but here's the most interesting story. it has to do with a woman named victoria of newland, the queen of the neo cons. she's stepping down. who is she?

why she's so wealthy. and what's this going to mean for ukraine? good questions. you bet. this is a direct impact the so if a picture is worth a 1000 words, then this one should be like an entire book, a book perhaps about the future of our country, the future of america. look at this. and as you're looking at this picture, those members, they're of the national guard, their soldiers, right? essentially inside some of the same ones served in iraq and afghanistan. those guys, those dials are now patrolling the subways of new york city. the optics of this, just think about it for a minute. the optics of the scene, bizarre to me anyway,

because one of the things that i always kind of separated in my mind, maybe because i'm a gringo here and that's the way i think. the way i separated us from the rest of the countries in the world that i've visited, for example, throughout latin america, is that we don't seem to have a military presence in our daily lives here in the united states. we don't, right? or at least that's what i always thought. i mean, and here's what i mean. have you ever been, for example, have you ever been on vacation to like the caribbean or to live in america? i always found that when i went there, i thought it was always unsettling. when i went there on trips with my wife and with my kids to see these guys and these pain military fatigues holding a machine gun, you know, and they were like next to me and my wife and my kids. while we were sitting on the beach or outside of store, or even at a park, and it always made me made us question. is there something going on here? the whole about was this guy sitting here with the machine gun, right? i'll save. can this place be where we're vacationing? if there's

a guy next to was with the machine gun in the military for tags. how free is this place? i asked. well, a, i'm what i'm wondering now should we be asking the same question about us here in the united states as we learned that a 1000 guards are being sent to patrol the subways 250 i'm. i'm going to be straight troopers, another $750.00 of them are going to be national guardsman sitting there. the subway is as you come in and out and go to work. why? new york officials are saying that it's a, it's for the turns to send the message to the potential bad guys. right. 9 the real reason, the some ways are just damn dangerous these days. they've already been 3 killings this year alone. commuters are being attacked and recently, even a train conductor had a slight slashed. you know, how many people use in new york subways, by the way? 3000000 people a day the united states has reportedly adding thousands of chinese companies to

a trade blacklist later today. in total, around e additional companies could be added to the so called entity list, nearly all of them chinese. did you hear that? yeah, the all of them chinese, so that has been pretty much the big story here in the united states in the past 8 years or so. we heard it during the comp administration we're hearing and now during the, by the ministration. the fame is pretty simple. go after and punish all chinese tech companies. what's interesting about this story is, is i've told it over the years and written about it over the years. and us tech companies, our guys here have long been warning us that these china sanctions, these things that we're doing, the chinese would end up hurting us or hurting them. in other words, right. the tech companies in the us. well guess what? and it's happened del, international business machines, cisco systems, they're all getting kicked out of china as beijing games to let its own companies

take over all tech operations by 2027. so why are the chinese doing this? well, according to them, they apparently don't trust us. american tech giants have long drive them china, as we provided them with tech tools, they provided us with cheap labor. and now the china reacting no doubt to the match the back and forth with washington over the last 7 or 8 years, said it's driven to self sufficiency. within the computer industry, it's operating systems and it's software systems because it doesn't trust the us tech companies any more. can you say take the time? usually the wise of presidents are exclusively engaged in peaceful affairs, their education, human rights, equality, accessibility, and maybe you expected from me to speak on those topics. but how can i talk about

them when and improve ok and provoke, invasive terrorist war is being waged against my country of russia is destroying, are with people that in case you couldn't figure it out for the records is the 1st lady of ukraine speaking recently. i remember at the invitation of nancy pelosi to the us congress or a congressional hearing or meeting. she was also invited to attend the state of the union by 1st lady joe biden, and they were going to be sitting together for all the world to see. but apparently mississauga lensky had said that see ain't doing it. she snubbing the us 1st lady snubbing the event. you wonder why? here's a story kind of gets weird. i mean, it reminds me of high school, pardon me for saying that. so she's not doing the invitation because she doesn't like the widow of to 10 critic alexi know volney. you can't make this stuff up

right. but here it is. according to the officially now mrs. sullen. scott? yes, that's how you pronounce her name. it's not zalinski cuz she's the wife, female, whatever. anyway, they say that when she heard that mrs. not volley pronounced noble maya was also invited. she said, well, that i'm not going, i'm not going if she's going. and apparently she's not going. her reason look and it's kind of complicated, but apparently it has to do with crimea. but despair you a headache, i'll save you the explanation for some other time and perhaps some other show. then there's missus newland thinks he can wait ukraine out and he thinks he can wait out all of us. we need to prove him wrong. that was under secretary of state victoria new live last month discussing tactics to stop russian president. what am i putting on the 2nd anniversary of the ukraine war? now just weeks later,

the career diplomat to turn top political appointee is retiring. there you go, secretary of state and then he blinked and has announced that his under secretary victoria newland. i guess there's number 2 or number 3, or whatever is stepping down. maryland is an interventionist. you know, that means, or other words, she likes wars and she likes sending our troops to go fight and worse. she's also large in very large measure, responsible for the escalation of the war in ukraine. in fact, outside of us media, she's known worldwide, right? you won't hear about it here because our media doesn't report this for some reason because i don't know. they just don't want you to know the truth, but she's known throughout the world and media reports around the world have shown this. she was the person who directed the c. i a to start the coo and ukraine to push out the democratically elected president, back in 2014. did you know that you probably did. if you're watching me from somewhere else outside of washington, why didn't she want him out? by the way,

why did you want that do the president at the time out because. busy his ties to russia. students are new and hates russia. hey, it's russia. i mean, with them and vigorous she h. russia. here's a smoking gun. now that proves that she did exactly what her critics charged. that she was overheard by the way, in the planning of this cool of the dates in precise context of the recording and not known new to the us some precedent to ukraine. jeffrey piet's discuss which of the countries opposition leaders they'd like to see and government and they refer to getting the un involved. so that would be great, i think, to help glue this thing and have the u. n. help fluid. and you know, the, you know, exactly, and i think we've got to do something to make it stick together because you can be pretty sure that if it does, if it does start to again, altitude, the russians will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo it so there it is . now here's what you need to know. i. i started this morning and last night doing

a little bit of a day gone now victoria know, and i wanted to find out who is victoria, knew it, right. this is the stuff that i think about victoria know, and that's relevant to her pro. so lensky stands, for example, she is a neo conservative to say the very least who also happens to be married to one of the most prolific neo conservatives, perhaps. and us for and. busy the history, so his husband, part of her husband, pardon me, is a guy named bob kagan, along with dick cheney and bill crystal. great pairing. huh. they actually together founded the neo conservative project back in 1997. they actually found it. right. and then use that to push for the disastrous war. that was iraq. here's something else. i think this is fascinating. i don't know. you might find it fascinating as well. well, no one makes roughly a $180000.00 a year. as a government employee, i looked it up. she said to be worth anywhere between $2.00 to $8000000.00

conservatively. and though she works for the government for our government, she also has a long standing relationship with a private company that handles 4 and government affairs. and that would be the albright stonebridge group. look them up, it seems conflict the why because that those folks the by the way, named after the former us secretary state madeline albright albright stonebridge seems conflicted because they make their money handling complex diplomacy deals with countries all over the world, which means they kind of get to choose who are the good guys who are the bad guys? they do deals with them. they get paid by them. but it sounds an awful lot like they're doing foreign policy. now this is what i want to dig into. so when we come back, when we come back, what's this mean for ukraine? when the, some would say architect of our ukraine policy,

these out. we're going to be joined by that guy right there. see him that's michael maloof said hi michael, former pedagogy official and george some wiley wrote bombs were peace nato's, who monetary and war on yugoslavia. and he is an advisor at the global policy institute and we're coming right back. do not go away. the of the,

[000:00:00;00] the, let's talk about this cause i think this is whole, this whole, the victoria know what the thing is fast that we're joined by michael maloof. as you know, michael maloof is a former pentagon official, and we're also going to be joined, as i told you about just a little bit earlier by george. so i'm well we welcome gentlemen michael, i begin with you and i'm thinking to myself here. if i am zelinski sitting in care of and i'm wondering, so newland is out. wait, that's my go that's. that's my go to person in the u. s. government, that's the one who helped me in 2014. what was the thinking right now? he's probably seeing the handwriting on the wall he's, i think this is a signal that it's over and that has offensive. if you can call it that is not working, it's and it's a and he's having to retreat. well, it's interesting because that actually makes me think, can there be a ukraine policy without victoria newland?

it seems like one hand goes with the other. no. well it's out of her. it's out of us hands at this point it's. it's becoming, it's not only not only the russians taking the eastern part button, you have countries such as poland, lithuania, these other countries that have historical ties to west ukraine. it is. and the reason why she was just so imbedded in, in ukraine is that her family came from what was the czars russia, which is to the west to credit. so it's kind of like a part it would be like new and making sure the united states attacks cuba. yeah. but it's like a family came from 2 of them. yeah, that's strong. exactly. it's like a family feud. good place. little person let's. uh, let's go to georgia somali of is your is, you know, is, is moment for right or are, or does the ukraine policy hedge on her and is the fact that she's out. let's say that it's going to be tough goings now for zalinski and his

group. and i'm not sure about that. i think that the united states as a european, they are absolutely wedded to this policy of you're basically trying to inflict defeat on russia through ukraine. i don't think it depends on victoria you. then she obviously has been a, a central thing up in the ukraine policy right from the beginning, you know, actually going back even to the 19 ninety's. however, i don't think us policy hangs on that, and even the noises that we're getting a uh, from your up with my crown saying that there are no limits. there are no red lines in our supports for the ukraine. and then you know, the, the british what the rating, the germans with them for being insufficiently zealous and supporting your brain. i think we're a long, long way from any, any policy of abandoning events. but i, but here's where i think my goal is right. uh if, if we, if,

if we had done the deal that was proposed a year ago or so with ukraine and zalinski would have said, i'll take that deal, let the russians take that part of the country and we're good, we're good. let's let, let's just finish this and he had taken it then he would have lost. i had them a lot less than he's losing now. so it just seems incremented lee, like it's certainly not going in his direction. wouldn't you argue? oh, that's absolutely right. i think um ukraine made it the softest, absolutely catastrophic decision in listening to bars johnson and through bars jones up to the americans up sticking with that policy that just shows up to be determined the british, the americans, and they do up to use ukraine to inflict a defeats on russia because let's remember that deal that was on the table in east i'm both was not at all favorable to rush. it was actually very favorable to rush within the premium. negotiate before amazed at the concessions the russians were

making. but nonetheless, they rejected that deal because they, they thought they sold this opportunity ready to screw russia over. so absolutely. so let's get to the thinking that deals for that doesn't mean the, the, in the burden and the americans and nato are abandoning this policy. right? no. okay, good. well, you guys are somebody disagreement on that and i'll accept that by the way. interestingly enough, as i recall, a lot of my putting told my friend tucker carlson, that he was willing to consider that deal and probably would have taken that deal back then. which is interesting looking at it. now if you know if, if he in fact whatever not, we don't know that's a part of history. now michael, back to you. i am bothered, i don't know if you listen to my intro, but i am bothered when i say this albright stonebridge group that apparently she has worked for apparently she's a big to do there as always blinking into or a bunch of people in the bottom administration when i read about this outfit,

it sounds to me like they do like foreign policy, rather like a shadow government. if you will. and foreign policy, you have to comp, pickering, also who belongs to it. and you have a lot of, admittedly, some real, a rhino republicans who work, who are, are, are part of that establishment. mm hm. and so they're, they're sort of a, a government and waiting, and they advise on who will, who will not be a good candidate. the way long they all they had to wait for, it was for binding to get elected because as soon as it got elected, he took all of them from that company, right. and then put them into his the state department, the state department. right now there's, there seems like there's some falling in that for me. i mean, well, we make it because they're because they're a part of the company. that means they do deals with these. what other minute service, the republicans do it. they pull him out of out of heritage and, and, and other a think tank. some of that it's, it's like that's conflict of it seems to me, isn't it? well, it might be conflict, but that's the way it is in washington. and so, and so you can then make an argument that the reason we do the things we do, let's just pick your brain because we happen to be talking about, i don't want to put too much, i can ukraine. so in many ways, the reason we're doing ukraine is because these guys, when they were,

and those companies already had a standing policy or, or deals that they had done with you, great in the government, but not only now they're going to work on their behalf. but they also had a near con, image of containment of russia. ukraine is just a stepping stone for russia. gotta keep that much. that's why i disagree with. what with my colleague here a little bit that the europeans are now beginning to understand the us got them into this mess. they're stuck with it us just thinking of pulling out, especially if trump were elect to be elected. but, and that affects nato. but let's leave, let's leave leave ukraine aside because now i'm like a dog with a bone stuck on this albright stonebridge thing. and i'm thinking to myself, man, it just sounds so incredibly corrupt. if you work for a government for, i'm sorry, if you work for a private company and that private companies, business is dealings with governments and you take money from those governments to do their deals. now you go work from the government and i pay you. and you are still going to do the same deals,

but now you're going to do them on behalf of me and my government and the taxes that i pay you. that's a conflict of interest. no, i mean i mean that the, you know, i that, that's kind of what i'm thinking here. george. no, it is. but the things i'd be goldbright stonebridge grew much like a live group. i mean these are private. what do they do? they go to countries and they secure investments. that's what they, they, these are, you know, you, you found the countries you pulverized of you installed a friendly government the following in your color revolution and then you make money. and that's the whole, the whole point of that, the old right, stonebridge will they make money, they go there with their own clients. and you know, how do i mean, invested in this country? and that's, and that's what they do in and over item particular, she made a lot of money on cost. so that was she was the big farmer in chief of casa though,

in the 90s. and then they pay for us. so i can make a lot of money here, and that's how people like gun doland get rich for themselves. you back. that sounds corrupt as hell. i mean, just, just to my hearing of it, i mean, it sounds unbelievably corrupt and you were about to go there. but if it's true is i read that she makes, she has anywhere between 2 and a $1000000.00 and that's very conservative. i mean, she's gotten rich off of her government position, trading, what she knows or contacts and her deals while pretending to be really working for the government of the united states, which she really wasn't my overstating. am i being fair? unfair? that's exactly. what do you say you go? do you go there? you in, georgia is georgia state. you're going to have in the nato membership down the road . i'm a, let's make some money left. so, you know, let's, let's do a deal. let's, let's sign a contract with. so you can invest in, let's invest that and there's a lot of money, you know, because these companies like this, the old rags stonebridge grew. they have clients like clients. well,

when they go make money, they want to go and invest in these countries that are big. i mean, clients states of the united states. so why, you know, politicians are part of, i mean that's of allows these filthy rich. so is the mcconnell, by the way, all they do is take them, you know, they take a salary of a 100, a couple, couple $100000.00 a year and somehow they end up in may of the millions of dollars. so, but in this case, these are not even elected officials. these are the members of the cabinets of all the different presidents, republicans, or democrats. shouldn't we do something to stop this? couldn't there be a rule if you, for example, here's a simple one, the rick sanchez roll, making it up as we go here. and you work for all bridgestone, right? or stone bridge or whatever the hell, his complex, you can't work. you can take a job and the government for at least 3 or 4 years, but we are just can't do it. we, we do that with defense companies. but with our generals, and when they retire, when they wait 3 or 4 years, then they get it as a r r. they get waivers from congress?

well, i do. well, that's what austin got. i mean, that's how we became a secretary defense right after he chose the apparently worth over 10000000. well he has, he was with, i believe lockheed so you know, it, it's so embedded in our, in our culture, our, our governing culture. how you get rid of it. now you won't be able to because it's so, but then if we don't get rid of it, every time somebody tells me that we have to give a $100000000.00 to ukraine or but you want to lab or wherever they how, what to the name of the country, my 1st question is, are we giving it to him because they need it, or are we going to get to it? because there's some people there who are cronies who are going to get rich off. well, that's why you need a congress that's on top of things that can do oversight and question these kinds of things. they actually have to approve the budgets and then what happened. they can question those things and, and bring it out. but then they're not, they're too busy of fiddling around as you know of george i, i'm left to think that there's no way for it except

a way that doesn't look very good because of this path continues. whether it's a rom, guys of ukraine, of china, the south try to say russia, i mean all i see is opportunities for people to get rich during conflictive or conflicts, wars conflagrations. then that means that these things are going to keep happening . well that's why newland it has, has, has been involved in non stop wars. it's, it's from afghanistan and, and, and, and then iraq. yeah, i'm all of this. i got you all riled up now. so let me get, let me that squared to, to, to george, go ahead. you're right. yeah, so that's way, right, because michael mentioned that i have well, the need for congressional oversight because the way they've written it in congress is that they can never be any oversight because these bills, 1000 page bills, they are right. and then you have to sign well, within about 2 hours. so no one, no one can possibly get through

a 1000 page bill into as in fine what's in the at and, and that's what, so, yeah, absolutely. what was huge amounts of money important here that no one knows what the hell to doing because unless you assign them a service, i'm not going to be paid. imagine a veterans, i'm not going to be paid. and then there's more of like, well, we have to, we have to actually sign and a couple of us so no really knows what the handles in the bill. and you literally have to go to russian television to find out about these things because you're not going to hear it from out as a group or you're not going to hear it from anybody on fox. you're not gonna be here without american newspapers. all these things that are going on that we as americans should know about because we loved this country and one of the want them it. and it just makes me crazy to know that most of my fellow citizens don't know about the things that are being done in their name. in their name, michael george, you guys are great gust. interesting discussion. great conversation. we'll do it again before i go. i want to remind you of our mission here that we try and have these conversations because we think it's important and we don't want to live in

the. so i'm on the right or i'm on the left or whatever. no choose, don't live in the right or in the left to serve everywhere. we should talk about them wherever they are. i'm rick sanchez. i'll be looking for you again right here . but i hope to provide a direct impact the the day in the united states. all foreign policy establishment, all national security establishment is a weapon. auction person becomes a cloak for our own aggression. it becomes a way of flushing other countries on the back for our record shows that we're not really that much of a democracy that we have no strip interfering in other countries when they produce

democratic outcomes. we don't like the south african american st. claire, what is the ultimate goal is as but sort of a levy's new charges against probably the voltage to get a 5 case. because i also present it says a was bump until the 12th of these incomes are 2 phone ways as a country. and this is something present from a poor, so loop of getting it to tend to use a re lease means that instrument to ensure that we see