i'm very similar to the process that we saw happen in the soft device in germany, in the 1950s, an effort to buy the states to suppress commandeer, corrupt uncontrolled with church. as in an, as an independent voice of critique of the state. this we have seen happen again here in ukraine with an effort to fail clerical goals and possessions in the church with right wing extreme nationalist noises. and yes, the evidence is they have, i'm has been there for a very long time that the, as all the in particular has demonstrated extreme right wing leanings and is a duty. it's a moral obligation of the church to speak truth and to condemn this as an extremely dangerous ideology. we are seeing very similar things happen in palestine at the moment. we see some of the most historic churches in the world being destroyed by

our united states all lie in them. at least i'm religion and religious institutions . particularly when the co opted by the state has become strategic and assets to west of the military power, which has shown itself to be quite aggressive, an expansionist it, and the actually part of the, the 21st century or anything, see a company on all the international this friday i do have you have a great start, see a weekend with back at the top of the out with the like to see that the, the bad. hi everybody. i'm at sanchez, and i'm here to tell you that after being a journalist and a news presenter for, for the biggest networks in the united states, it's time for some context and for some truth telling. and then that vein,

here's what we're going to be talking about. number one, why are soldiers now patrolling new york sub ways? what does that say? number 2, china tells us tech companies that out. is it getting mad or is it getting even number 3? why is alana zillow and scott, the 1st lady of ukraine in case you didn't know snubbing 1st lady jo biden's invitation to sit with her at the state of the union address me. but here's the most interesting story. it has to do with a woman named victoria of newland, the queen of the neo cons. she's stepping down. who is she? why she's so wealthy. and what's this going to mean for ukraine? good questions. you bet. this is a direct impact the

so if a picture is worth a 1000 words, then this one should be like an entire book, a book perhaps about the future of our country, the future of america. look at this. and as you're looking at this picture, those members, they're of the national guard, their soldiers, right? essentially inside some of the same ones you've served in iraq and afghanistan. those guys, those dials are now patrolling the subways of new york city. the optics of this, just think about it for a minute. the optics of the scene, bizarre to me anyway, because one of the things that i always kind of separated in my mind, maybe because i'm a gringo here and that's the way i think. the way i separated us from the rest of the countries in the world that i've visited, for example, throughout latin america, is that we don't seem to have a military presence in our daily lives here in the united states. we don't, right?

or at least that's what i always thought. i mean, and here's what i mean. i've never been, for example, have you ever been on vacation to like the caribbean or the line america? i always found that when i went there, i thought it was always unsettling. when i went there on trips with my wife and with my kids to see these guys in these military fatigues holding a machine gun, you know, and they were like next to me and my wife and my kids. while we were sitting on the beach or outside of store, or even at a park, and it always made me made us question. is there something going on here about why this guy sitting here with the machine gun, right? i'll save. can this place be where we're vacationing? if there's a guy next to us with the machine gun in the military for tags. how free is this place? i asked. well, a, i'm what i'm wondering now should we be asking the same question about us here in the united states as we learned that a 1000 guards are being sent to patrol the subways 250 of them going to be straight

troopers. another $750.00 of them are going to be national guardsmen sitting there . the subway is as you come in and out and go to work why new york officials are saying that it's for the turns to send the message to the potential bad guys. right, the real reason, the some ways are just damn dangerous these days. they've already been 3 killings this year alone. commuters are being attacked and recently, even a train conductor had a slight slashed. you know, how many people use in new york subways by the way? 3000000 people a day the united states has reportedly adding thousands of chinese companies to a trade blacklist later today. in total, around e additional companies could be added to the so called entity list, nearly all of them chinese. did you hear that? yeah, the all of them chinese, so that has been pretty much the big story here in the united states in the past 8 years or so. we heard it during the comp administration we're hearing and now

during the, by the ministration. the same is pretty simple. go after and punish all chinese tech companies. what's interesting about this story is, is i've told it over the years and written about it over the years. us tech companies, our guys here have long been warning us that these china sanctions, these things that we're doing in the chinese would end up hurting us or putting them in other words, right. the tech companies in the us. well guess what? as it's happened, del, international business machines, cisco systems, they're all getting kicked out of china as beijing games to let its own companies take over all tech operations by 2027. so why are the chinese doing this? well, according to them, they apparently don't trust us. american tech giants had long drives in china as we provided them with tech tools. they provided us with cheap labor amount. china,

reacting no doubt to the match the back and forth with washington over the last 7 or 8 years. savage, driven to self sufficiency within the computer industry. it's operating systems and it's software systems because it doesn't trust the us tech companies any more. can you say take that usually the wise of presidents are exclusively engaged in peaceful affairs, education, human rights, equality, accessibility, and maybe you expected from me to speak on those topics. but how can i talk about them when an unprovoked and pro invasive terrorist war is being waged against? and my country of russia is destroying all the people that in case you couldn't figure it out for the records, is the 1st lady of ukraine speaking recently and ended at the invitation of nancy pelosi to the us congress or

a congressional hearing or meeting. she was also invited to attend the state of the union by 1st lady joe biden, and they were going to be sitting together for all the world to see. but apparently mrs. lensky has said that, as see ain't doing it. she snubbing the us 1st lady snubbing the event, one of the why here's the story kind of gets weird. i mean, it reminds me of high school, pardon me for saying that. so she's not doing the invitation because she doesn't like the widow of to 10 critic alexi know volney. you can't make this stuff up right. but here it is. according to p. uh, officially, now mrs. sullen. scott? yes, that's how you pronounce her name. it's not zalinski cuz she's the wife team, whatever. anyway, they say that when she heard that mrs. not volley pronounced noble maya was also invited. she said, well, that i'm not going,

i'm not going if she's going. and apparently, she's not going. her reason look and it's kind of complicated, but apparently it has to do with crimea. but despair you a headache, i'll save you the explanation for some other time and perhaps some other show. then there's missus newland thinks he can wait ukraine out and he thinks he can wait out all of us. we need to prove him wrong. that was under secretary of state victoria newland last month discussing tactics to stop russian president. what am i putting on the 2nd anniversary of the ukraine war? now, just weeks later, the career diplomat to turn top political appointee is retiring. here you go, secretary of state. anthony blinked and has announced that his under secretary, victoria newland, i guess is number 2 or number 3 or whatever is stepping down. maryland is an interventionist a. do you know that means other words,

she likes wars and she like sending our troops to go fight in worse. she's also large in very large measure, responsible for the escalation of the war in ukraine. in fact, outside of us media, she's known worldwide, right? you won't hear about it here because our media doesn't report this for some reason because i don't know. they just don't want you to know the truth. but she's known throughout the world and media reports around the world have shown this. she was the person who directed the c. i a to start the coo and ukraine to push out the democratically elected president. back in 2014. did you know that you probably did . if you're watching me from somewhere else outside of washington, why didn't she want him out? by the way, why did you want that? do the president at the time out? because. busy his ties to russia. is it a tory, everyone hates russia? it's russia. i mean, with them and vigorous she h. russia. here's a smoking gun. now that proves that she did exactly what her critics charged. that she was overheard by the way,

in the planning of this cool of the dates in precise context of the recording and not known new to the us some precedent to ukraine. jeffrey piet's discuss which of the countries opposition leaders they'd like to see and government and they refer to getting the un involved. so that would be great, i think, to help glue this thing and have the u. n. help fluid. and you know, the, you know, exactly, and i think we've got to do something to make it stick together because you can be pretty sure that if it does, if it does start to gain altitude the russians. ready will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo it. so there it is. now here's what you need to know. i, i started this morning and last night doing a little bit of a day a gone now victoria new and i wanted to find out who is victoria, knew it. right. this is the stuff that i think about victoria know, and that's relevant to her pro. so lensky stance, for example, she is a neo conservative to say the very least who also happens to be married to one of the most prolific neo conservatives, perhaps, and us for and. busy the history,

so his husband, part of her husband, pardon me, is a guy named bob kagan, along with dick cheney and build crystal great pairing. huh. they actually together found to the neo conservative project back in 1997. they actually found it right. and then use that to push for the disastrous war. that was iraq. here's something else. i think this is fascinating. i don't know. you might find it fascinating as well. well, no one makes roughly a $180000.00 a year. as a government employee, i looked it up, she said to be worth anywhere between $2.00 to $8000000.00 conservatively and the she works for the government for our government. she also has a long standing relationship with a private company that handles foreign government affairs. and that would be the albright stonebridge group. look them up. it seems conflicted. why? because that those folks the, by the way, named after the former us secretary state madeline albright albright stonebridge

seems conflicted because they make their money handling complex diplomacy deals with countries all over the world. which means they kind of get to choose who are the good guys who are the bad guys. they do deals with them. they get paid by them . what do you think? sounds off a lot like they're doing foreign policy. now. this is what i want to dig into. so when we come back, when we come back, what's this mean for ukraine? when the, some would say architect of our ukraine policy, these out. we're going to be joined by that guy right there. see him. that's michael maloof said hi michael, former pentagon official and george. some wally wrote bombs, were peace nato's who monetary of war on yugoslavia. and he is an advisor at the global policy institute and we're coming right back. do not go away. the,

the, the release of come to the russian states never as tight as on the phone in the most sense, community, best of all sense and up the, in the 6595 must be the one else calls question about this,

even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin, knew the machine for states on the rush to day and split our t supposed neck, even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube tv services for the question, did you say steven twist, which is the, let's talk about this because i think this is whole, this whole, the victoria know what the thing is fascinating. we're joined by michael maloof. as you know, michael maloof is a former pentagon official, and we're also going to be joined, as i told you about just a little bit earlier by your to some. well,

a welcome gentleman michael. i begin with you and i'm thinking to myself here. if i am zelinski sitting in care of and i'm wondering, so newland is out. wait, that's my go that's. that's my go to person in the u. s. government, that's the one who helped me in 2014. what must see be thinking right now. he's probably seeing the handwriting on the wall he's. i think this is a signal that it's over and that has offensive, if you call it that me is not working, it's and it's a and he's having to retreat. well, it's interesting because that actually makes me think, can there be a ukraine policy without victoria new? and it seems like one hand goes with the other. no. well, it's out of her. it's out of us hands at this point it's, it's becoming, it's not only not only the russians taking the eastern part button, you have countries such as poland, lithuania, these other countries that have historical ties to west ukraine. it is. and the reason why she was just so imbedded in ukraine is that her family came from what

was the czars russia, which is today west ukraine. so it's kind of like a part, it would be like new and making sure the united states attacks cuba. yeah. but it's like a family came from 2 of them. yeah, that story. exactly. it's like a family to good place. it all is person, let's. uh, let's go to georgia somali of is your is, you know, is, is moment right or are, or does the ukraine policy hedge on her and is the fact that she's out. let's say that it's going to be tough goings now for zalinski and his group. and i'm not sure about that. i think that the united states as a european is they are absolutely wedded to this policy of you're basically trying to inflict the feet on russia it through you. great. i don't think it depends on victoria you. then she obviously has been a, a central thing up in the ukraine policy right from the beginning, you know,

actually going back even to the 19 ninety's. however, i don't think us policy hangs on that. and even the noises that we're getting a uh, from your up with my crown saying that there are no limits. there are no red lines in our supports for uh, ukraine. and then you know, the, the british what the rating, the germans with them for being in suspension. please sell us and support in your brain. i think we're a long, long way from any, any policy of abandoning events. but i but, but here's where i think my goal is right. uh if, if we, if, if we had done the deal that was proposed a year ago or so with ukraine is the landscape. what is that? i'll take that deal. let the russians take that part of the country and, and we're good, we're good. let's let, let's just finish this. if he had taken it, then he would have lost a heck of a lot less than he's losing now. so it just seems incrementally like it's certainly not going in his direction. wouldn't you argue?

you know, that's absolutely right. i think um ukraine made the softest, absolutely catastrophic decision in listening to bars. johnson and through bars. johnson, the, to the americans are sticking with that policy that just shows up to be determined, the british, the americans, and they do up to use your grain to inflict a defeat on russia. because let's remember that deal that was on the table and it's them both was not at all favorable to rush. it was actually very favorable to rush within the premium. negotiate before amazed at the concessions the russians were making. but nonetheless, they rejected that deal because they thought they sold this opportunity ready to screw russia over so absolutely. so let's get to the thinking that deals for that doesn't mean that the, the burden of americans and nature are abandoning as low as i knew it was. okay, good. well, you guys are somebody disagreement on that? and i'll accept that by the way. interestingly enough, as i recall,

a lot of my putting told my friend tucker carlson, that he was willing to consider that deal and probably would've taken that deal back then. which is interesting looking at it. now if you know, if, if he in fact whatever not, we don't know. that's a part of history. now michael, back to you. i am bothered, i don't know if you listen to my intro, but i am bothered. what i this all bright stonebridge group that apparently she has worked for apparently she's a big to do. there is always blinking ins or a bunch of people in the bottom administration. when i read about this outfit, it sounds to me like they do like foreign policy, rather like a shadow government, if you will. in foreign policy, you have to comp, pickering, also who belongs to, i mean you have a lot of, admittedly, some real, a rhino republicans who work, who are, are, are part of that establishment. mm hm. and so they're, they're sort of a, a government and waiting, and they advise on who will,

who will not be a good candidate the way long. they all, they had to wait for, it was for binding to get elected. because as soon as they got elected, he took all of them from that company, right. and then put them into his, the state department, the state department. right now there's, there seems like there's some folly in that for me. i mean, why we make it because they're because they're a part of the company. that means they do deals with these. what other methods over the republicans do it, they pull them out of out of heritage and, and, and other uh, think tank submitted it. it would have conflict if it seems to me, isn't it? well, it might be conflict, but that's the way it is in washington. and so, and so you can then make an argument that the reason we do the things we do, let's just pick you crank of we happen to be talking about. i don't want to pick too much. are you? great? so in, in many ways, the reason we're doing ukraine is because these guys, when they were, and those companies already had a standing policy or, or deals that they had done with you, great in the government. but not only that, but now they're gonna work on their behalf. but, but they also had a near con, image of containment of russia. ukraine is just a stepping stone for russia. gotta keep that much. that's why i disagree with. what

with my colleague here a little bit that the europeans are now beginning to understand the us got them into this mess. they're stuck with it. the us is thinking of pulling out, especially if trump were elect to be elected. but it's, and that affects nato. but let's leave, let's leave ukraine aside because now i'm like a dog with a bone stuck on this albright stonebridge thing. and i'm thinking to myself, man, it just sounds so incredibly corrupt. if you work for a government for, i'm sorry, if you work for a private company and that private companies, business is dealings with governments and you take money from those governments to do their deals. now you go work for the government and i pay you. and you are still going to do the same deals, but now you're going to do them on behalf of me and my government and the taxes that i pay you. that's a conflict of interest. no, i mean i mean that the, you know, i that, that's kind of what i'm thinking here, george. no way that it is. but the things that vehicle bright stonebridge grew much like the call live group. i mean these are private. what do they do?

they go to a countries and they secure the investment. so that's what they, they, these are, you know, you, you found the countries you pulverize of you install a friendly government the following in your color revolution and then you make money. and that's the whole, the whole point of that, the old right, stonebridge will they make money, they go there with their own clients. and you know, how do i mean, invested in this country? and that's and that's what they do in and over item particular, she made a lot of money on cost. so that was she was the big bomber in chief of costa though in the 90s. and then they pay for us. so i can make a lot of money here, and that's how, uh like, uh, doland get rich for themselves. you back. that sounds corrupt as hell. i mean, just, just am i doing of it. i mean, it sounds unbelievably corrupt and you were about to go there. but if it's true, as i read that she makes, she has anywhere between 2 and

a $1000000.00 and that's very conservative. i mean, she's gotten rich off of her government position, trading, what she knows or contacts and her deals while pretending to be really working for the government of the united states when she really wasn't my overstating. am i being fair or unfair? that's exactly what do you say you go? do you go there, you are georgia. you promised georgia state. you're going to have in the nato membership down the road. i'm a, let's make some money. let's so, you know, let's, let's do a deal. let's, let's sign a contract, let's say, investigated. let's invest that and there's a lot of money, you know, because these companies like this, the old rags stonebridge crew, have clients like clients. well, when they go make money, they want to go and invest in these countries that are big. i mean, clients states of the united states. so why, you know, politicians are part of, i mean that's of allows these filthy rich. so is the mcconnell, by the way, all they do is take a, you know, they take a salary of a 100, a couple, couple $100000.00 a year and somehow they end up in may of the millions of dollars. so,

but in this case, these are not even elected officials. these are the members of the cabinets of all the different president republicans or democrats. shouldn't we do something to stop this? couldn't there be a rule if you, for example, here's a simple one. the rick sanchez wrote, making it up as we go here. if you work for auburn stone, right? or stone bridge or whatever the house calibrate, you can't work. you can take a job and the government for at least 3 or 4 years, but we are just kept doing it. we do that with defense companies. but with our generals, and when they retire, when they wait 3 or 4 years, then they get it as a r r. they get waivers from congress? well, i do. well, that's what austin got. i mean, that's how he became a secretary defense right after he chose the apparently worth over 10000000. well he has, he was with the, i believe lockheed so you know, it, it's so embedded in our, in our culture, our, our governing culture. how you get rid of it. now you won't be able to because it's so, but then if we don't get rid of it, every time somebody tells me that we have to give

a $100000000.00 to ukraine or but you want to lab or wherever they how. what was the name of the country? my 1st question is, are we giving it to them because they need it? or are we going to get to it? because there's some people there who are cronies who are going to get rich off. well, that's why you need a congress that's on top of things that can do oversight and question these kinds of things. they actually have to approve the budgets and then what happen, they can question those things and, and bring it out. but then they're not, they're too busy of fiddling around or, you know, bob, george, i, i've left to think that there's no way forward except a way that doesn't look very good because of this path continues. whether it's a rom, guys of ukraine, of china, the south try to say russia, i mean all i see is opportunities for people to get rich during conflictive or conflicts, wars conflagrations. then that means that these things are going to keep happening . well that's why newland, it has, has, has been involved in non stop wars. it's,

it's from afghanistan and, and, and, and then iraq. yeah, i'm all of this. i got you all wild up now. so let me get, let me, let sports it to george go ahead years, right? yeah. so that's way, right, because michael mentioned the web will the need for congressional oversight because the way they've written it in congress is that they can never be any oversight because these bills, 1000 page bills, they arrive and then you have to sign well within about 2 hours so no one know what to do, you guys can possibly get through a 1000 page bill into as and find what's in the and, and, and that's what so, yeah, absolutely what least huge amounts of money important here that no one knows what the hell to doing because he, unless you sign then a service, i'm not going to be paid imaginable veterans, i'm not going to be paid. and then this is more of like, well we have to, we have to actually sign. and a couple of us to know really knows what the hell is in these bill and,

and you literally have to go to russian television to find out about these things because you're not gonna hear it from management group or you're not going to hear it from anybody on fox, you're not going to hear that american newspapers, all these things that are going on, that we as americans should know about because we love this country and one of the want them it. and it just makes me crazy to know that most of my fellow citizens don't know about the things that are being done in their name. in their name, michael george, you guys are great gust. interesting discussion. great conversation. we'll do it again before i go. i want to remind you of our mission here that we try and have these conversations because we think it's important and we don't want to live in the. so i'm on the right or i'm on the left or whatever. no twos don't live in the right or in the left to serve everywhere. we should talk about them wherever they are. i'm rick sanchez. i'll be looking for you again right here. but i hope to provide a direct impact the, [000:00:00;00]

the, [000:00:00;00] the question i mean, you love seeing those what, what do you live most schools do, if you look on the initial, do wanna call us a gift card dealer post on zillow, while it be almost getting used to put value when you, when you do oil change, but you're also still, this is done the newest operating systems to build

a new do what i see these the buses. the little gear limitation says this tutorial on both of the diesels is concerned. the dentist of at least 3 people in gauze city as a result of power, shooting 12th of humanitarian aid. and these made necessary, by the way, the blockade is pulled close. also ahead. one thing quite clear that president fighting doesn't get keys out of touch on us. we're public and lawmakers lounge i bindings states of the union address, which he keeps on by focusing on ukraine. instead of a sudden, additions on the home front, a government decision that gives alter hospital fuse, the privilege known to be with, with the, to the army is valid until the end of march this year. the whole time,