likely would not have seen if you were watching television. it's just let's say in the united states. i think the biggest story is victoria maryland. victoria newland is out at the state department. there's something that goes with that too. did you see what happened with president zalinski, his wife? man, she did something really weird that we're going to be talking about. george galloway . oh, my goodness, the george galloway tape. it's a tape it's being seen around the world. and i'm gonna let you see a part of it because you're going to be talking about it for some time. joe biden says, no, but is he right? i mean, he says, no, but the cause of war is escalating. it is escalating as both these just what happened this week? german general scott, right handed, planning an attack on russia. boy, that's something you've got to listen to. i mean, talk about getting caught red handed. it really is a case of that in the spring board. it's saying that mr. trump will be on all the balance in the united states all 50 states. also this wire us troops now patrolling new york some ways. a kind of weird. i think. i don't know what you think. and

china, it says to can play this game. they're telling us tech companies get out a drive. all right, well join now by our panel. i got a nixon is the host of be critical. our on sputnik jamal thomas who's lines found sputnik. i talked to these guys all the time about things that are going on in the world and that we get to share some of our thoughts with you. let's start with victoria new and how big a deal is a jamal. the fact that she is out and what's the signal that that's ends, let's say you are, let's just say for tenure of a lot of mere jewel zalinski right now. and you just heard this news. what are you thinking? oh my god. we're not going to continue to support me. that would be my 1st let me give you my victoria new and as one of the architects of that war, i mean hands, you know, cookies and all this other stuff. but yeah, she is directly related to pushing an agenda. appreciating change in your grade was

the main point. here's how it was presented here in the united states. let's tell us the dates in precise context of the recording and not known you'd under the us on precedent to ukraine. jeffrey piet's discuss which of the countries opposition lead is they'd like to see and government and they refer to getting the un involved . so that would be great, i think, to help glue this thing and how the u. n. help fluid and you know, the, you know, exactly, and i think we've got to do something to make it stick together because you can be pretty sure that if it does, if it does start to again, altitude, the russians will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo it. now, i probably don't have to tell you garland where that was about. if you listen to it, you know that that was the smoking gun. that seemed to prove to most people around the world that victoria knew and had everything to do in 2014 with that could have taught, or she tried to get rid of a democratically elected president in ukraine sense and she's been running the entire operation. it seems right. how important do you think this decision is today

and do you think it's going to have an effect or no, or do you agree with them? i think it's very important that i think the people that will be the most concerned will be the very hawkish leaders in europe. i think they understand that they're the are the support for the ukraine. neil con project is waning in the united states, particularly in congress. that donald trump is a ripple and the republican party now, and they're not getting any money out of congress. and i think they are now concerned at their most ardent supporter, the person that would keep the u. s. machine focused on ukraine is gone and that we only have an effect on their ability to maintain a continuity. you don't think there's enough and there are other people around her . i mean, uh who will no doubt continue to push this thing and see if they can make it happen . yeah, imagine that means you might just wanna give a speech to the state of the union talk about we're going to be with you praying for as long as it takes a while, but newly is particularly can take or so. mean keeping my team right for one of those think she's worked with. dick cheney at one point meeting she's she's like

neil calling for new god. well, you spoke about that state of the union and i think one of the weirdest things that i've seen in a long time, and i don't know if you guys know about this, but there's something going on right now where the 1st lady misses cilenzo little villains uh, is that pronounced correctly? because when you pronounce that females name and russian right, you actually changed it a little bit. so president is the landscapes wife has decided that even though she was invited by the us government and by joe biden, the 1st lady of the united states to go and sit next to her at the state of the union. she said, no, she's not going to sit next to her. and the reason she's decided not to say next door is because apparently novalis wife was also invited and she said if she's going, i'm not going. apparently they don't like each other. and apparently it has to do with something of all they said about cry meal. but what a weird situation said this woman who is essentially the lady of ukraine. yes. is

invited to sit next to the 1st lady of the united states and she says, no, i'm not gonna go well. and it also goes to show that below this argument that this entire ukrainian problem started in february of 2022. that there was a long, historical background to your involving. i mean, you could go all the way back to the crusades and why are they calculate from the neighbor river on the poland and how they, you know, the procedures got stopped the need for rivers, but the bottom line is when it comes down to it, there is a deep intellectual conversation to be had about ukraine. it's not just about vladimir putin woke up one day and got angry just and i think this is evidence that there's more to this conflict than meets the guy. here is the 1st lady of ukraine giving a speech. this is not a speech recently. this is when she was invited by man to below see to speak in an around congress. here it is. usually the wise of presidents are exclusively engaged in peaceful affairs, education, human rights, equality, uh,

accessibility. and maybe you expected from me to speak on those topics. but how can i talk about them when, and i'm for loca, and provoke, invasive terrorist war is being waged against my country of russia is destroying our with people here. this just, i'm so sorry for saying this, and i don't mean to be disrespectful, but it seems like something you would hear about in high school. it's, it's, i mean it's keep in mind that story, but the us has given us all of the started on, you know, just recently in 2022 and met them. it was a long history. and the way the goal of pointing out there was a historical context, right? and for whatever reason, in order to justify all of the money and everything else that we've been putting into this particular conflict, we've had to ignore reality itself out to just trying to take of all of europe. that seems to be the way they are going in those place a little and she was pushing in a speech. i want to show you guys something now, because did you want to say something i would add this and here's another reality

that i suspected. first, she hates russians. there isn't, there was an, an ethnic racism, whatever you want to call it, that here the unit that is in, in the ukraine that the united states has pushed to take advantage of to make short for many, many years all way back to the fifty's in the band there at the vendor right now, the russians and i think part of it is she's not going to sit next to one of those things was in or english. she had tried to age button. yeah. but she also hates devolving, which is interesting. in fact, apparently that zalinski government hates and of all me in the office that there were even citing with just last week and there was a report the mom a had been killed by putting the ones who came out and said no to that and killing me died of natural causes. yeah. again, you get back to this, they just hate broccoli since and they're happy to see another russian day and they're not gonna sit next door russians. they don't want to sing a russian song. they don't want to a street named after a russian,

and i think that's what it comes down to it. she can't go back to the band of rights and say, oh yeah, i sat next to a russian person and smile. so they have that in common with the with, with victoria noted on, right. seems like although victoria no one is making money by hating rush. i, she's worth somewhere between $2.00 and $8000000.00, even though she makes a government salary of $180000.00. i've always wondered how you get to those big figures when you're in a government job. but i think we could figure it out in the case of victoria now. yeah, she will be fine. is a will be fine. yeah, she works really. all right, i don't bridge organization which essentially does our foreign policy when they're not working for the government. it's a freaking thing. all right, here we go. this is, i think, one of the best moments of the week. this is the esteemed george galloway after returning to the british parliament. being asked of question by a reporter. and it's fascinating as you watch this because it may be you tell me

what you think after you watch this and you can do so on twitter and rick sanchez, tv. and you don't think this is one of the best take downs of a corporate type reporter that you've seen in a long time. here it is. you don't respect the members. do i respect the prime minister? i despise the prime minister and get millions and millions and millions of people in this country despise the prime minister. i don't respect the prime minister at all. there is something about him standing up to somebody who's giving your lot. i love it. i love it. i love it. what do you love about? because the foreigner is at the times when somebody is doing an interview like that, they're actually a particular question. putting you on the spot which you and the asking you to question in a way that kind of suggests the answer that you expect to get. so i think it respects the prime minister because that's all things like research. so that came up basically, batch do are, you know, you don't have a feeling of other people,

not only do i not respect this buys. yeah. yeah. it's like you to be on. i don't care. yeah. it's not just vice prime minister. so you're bringing this. i think even what we said you acting like he bought down the 10 commandments when he just was watching that i wasn't just thinking about what you said, which is, you know, putting a reporter in his by for asking a stupid question. i'm almost thinking that there are people in this world and especially in the western media that if you said to them something like, do you know that there may be another perspective than the one that your sharing do? you know, for example, there's a different perspective than what you believe in terms of israel's right to go in there and kill so many palestinians. do you know there's a different perspective on the ukranian story? do you know what happened in 2014 and ukraine? they would look at you like you have horns coming out of your head and i dropped the sense that when he said that right, garland to that reporter when he challenged that reporter with,

why are you bringing up the prime minister's name like i have to bow what do you say is name is a lot of people disagree with the prime minister. the reporter did not understand that. right? because i think i saw that that was a, a reporter as a personal cell. we have a certain protocol, particularly in britain, england. we must be printing properties and we must so respects to the institutions, etc. there are people that are furious at these institutions in vicariously through a george galloway. they're saying that so george galloway said, no, i'm not going to respect your protocol. i'm going to stand up for these people in the street that are suffering and say, do you go jump in a lake? we don't like it. he's saying there is another perspective out there. yeah, you need to listen to it as well. and apparently he made the point very fortunately in ways that i've never seen it made perhaps so well, i'm gonna show you a piece of video right now. and when we come back, i want you guys to talk about this. what you're going to see right now, right here,

are german generals, as they're actually discussing what it is that they plan to do in russia. take a listen to this, i came to the conclusion that there are 2 interesting targets originally east of the munition depos above the originally used as hard to reach. it's a rather small target, but the tourist can be i mentioned deep close to the also basset, even if we consider the bridge. i don't think torres is enough. we need to have an idea of how it's only for, for that satellite data. i don't know if we can train the ukrainians for such a task in a short time, and we're talking about a month. they're talking about bombing a russian bridge. they're talking about bombing a russian bridge. when we come back, we'll take that part as well. stay with us, don't go with the

all the same rom, just on the safe house and engagement because the trail when so many find themselves will support, we choose to look for common ground, the hello and welcome to cross the full doors. here we discuss the wheel in one year and do the 2 attempt to collect at business exit and law. apache

sat there for the show and then it will be a job to last negotiate. and all of it is intended for the defense of the supplement is such a question and not to mention it. i thought someone did you lose it? ask you. i think if i see the media, i love people, there's only 2 reasons to just say when you see the new country to 10 piece of us and they're going to be present the day before the work, it done stimulates the industry on a little less money. in the process really left, so should william farmer shots, monuments. so we have good guy started to decision the day, my lab and what was that man was elizabeth nikki. left on is the what is the best one today and but to the left hand side. so that's what the additional set i'm showing. those are pretty show can was on page to refresh the screen. those are the

best do what i mean? there's a push out the the welcome back. i'm rick sanchez, is a special edition of direct impact where we, where we talk through the stories of the week and i've got to tell you, i found this story to be absolutely fascinating. it after i listen to these, these german generals for a long time planning a bombing of a russian bridge using a tourist missile. i can't help but ask myself, are they trying to start with for 3? are they trying to start void war 3? i mean, is this what these guys are doing? here's a piece of that of that leaked audio. the kind where does he at hot it doesn't matter. we need to ensure that from the very beginning,

there is no mention that would make us a lot of the conflicts. might i am exaggerating a bit, but if we tell the minister now that we plan meetings and we'll drive by call from problems i'm old. so that no one notices that's already participation and we want to do that. yeah, i have. so let me ask you the question that i just asked our esteemed viewers all over the world. are they trying to start world war 3? so, you know, i think that one of the things that this shows is that they don't really believe the propaganda that vladimir putin is a med man. they can't be trusted. that they don't really believe that because they believe that they wouldn't take these kind of chances that they believe they can get away with it. and even if they get caught, they feel like, well, he's reasonable, he's not going to attack us. i see what you're saying. there that's interesting because all we hear about putting is he's a madman, he's a bad man. he's about to invade all of europe. oh my god. and you can't take those kind of chances with a minute. it may again. basically they're saying no, we don't, we don't, we don't, we, we must not think much of him bad. exactly. right. i mean,

do you think that the, the german chancellor knew that this was happening? no, i mean it the way the conversations that he says when at the chance and we're going to go from so and so and so, and so, i mean, even makes the point of saying like, you know, we don't want to be involved. we don't want any a fingerprint, so in and everything else is unclear whether it's towards muffles, obviously, or so there's a big space thing itself, like the german, they just, they do what they kept coming to, you know, as the story is, the one that's running the german government did schultz know, and even when the story broke, germany freaked out, we said we're going to do an investigation to figure out when we came from ignoring the contents of a week to yes, yes. oh my gosh, that is so important. i'm so glad you say that part of my passion responding to what you just said, but if there's one and i'm glad you said that, and that's why we're having this conversation. if 1st of all, i'm a journalist, you know what i love other than my wife and my kids, and my producers and i always loved to mix. yeah, i lovely, eccentric,

i'm all for needs. as many leaks as, of course, i don't want the atomic bomb or government secrets that can hurt somebody. but generally speaking of you know, something about my government that i, as a citizen should know, i want that lead. that's why i respect julia massage and everything. so that he's done, we just heard the german chancellor come out and essentially say not as you say, we're going to go after these generals for doing this for planning a pac on russia, which could literally create a world wide configuration. no, he says we're going to investigate how this link got out. that's crazy. well and it just goes to show that he actually understands how powerless he is. he already understands that he's powerless in the face of the us power of you in the face of us imperialism. but he realizes that within his own government, he's powerful. he understands, as they all do, that in this me a fraudulent, a ukrainian proxy war that all of the neo cons in the hawks around the you are

getting their opportunity to throw a missile were a rock any time they want to. but oh, la shields knows. he understands the limits of his power. let's talk about donald trump. yes. because this announcement was made by our steam to media. but using that word a lot. during this newscast here it is. we've learned that it was a 9 to nothing decision and ruling that donald trump can be on. the ballad in colorado and other states, even justices during the oral argument, seemed very skeptical of the idea that one state could decide for the nation. whether donald trump was an insurrection to us and was therefore disqualified under this 150 year old provision. now there's a lot of talk in the united states, certainly on the last gentleman that uh, this is a supreme court that's bought and sold bess. donald trump's supreme court, it's a conservative court judge course they were going to put donald trump on the court on, on the balance, despite the fact that he's

a quote unquote insurrection is ok. argument accepted, not, i'm not an unpopular argument, a fair argument, but here's the problem. and where i tend to side with this particular supreme court decision. i set it earlier in the week on one of our newscasts. if you allow one state to side or decide who is allowed to run in that state, then what will have, i fear in the future is a case where if you have $25.00 republican states, yep, you're going to have $25.00 states where the democrat is not allowed to run. and if you have $25.00 democrats states, you're going to have $25.00 states where the republic is not going to be allowed to run. and that will all be really create hell in this process, the high opinion, what do you, what do you said, really? i mean it to be fair. it's one of the arguments supreme court made themselves. i mean, i say congress shouldn't make this decision and not the state, right. but when you were actually in the argument, and this is one of the things that basically came up, this kind of came around system of governance and everything else. well,

reality of it is they are trying to save the donor from something on the left the i'm not a fan of front. oh, so like i need to edit it, but that's okay. we're not. clinical. 9 justices 3 of which were liberal justices that still came down in the exact same side. say, you can't do this once. they can't pull a man on the ballot for why he wasn't charged with insurrection. mm. to, he wasn't convicted of, it's a direction. i think another copy gets big like made for examples like yeah, i know i'm just a secretary of state, but screw it, we're going to go to colorado and i think where they're wise, if you'll allow me is garlan. when they say, if you want to call them and instruction us, then congress has to come out and put that stamp on his forehead and them after they do that, they can make a decision that ends or insurrection is, are not allowed to run. because what happened after the civil war, the united states were candidates, were removed because, sorry, you were on the wrong side. i'm not sure there's enough proof for that in this case . or am i wrong? i agree with the person that has to be convicted of something. there has to be some

of factual evidence to show that they would that he was. that is a final decision. ok, he's and he's an insurrection. if that hasn't happened, see the other part. oh, i believe he invited all those people who ended up acting as insurrection is that day. but i don't think because he invited them and then they den something that he gave them exact, the marching orders. yes, not a problem. yes. my point is there's been no finding of fact correct. he's done that so you don't have anything. and the other part of it is the slippery slope. the next thing that kind of a state does is they pass a ruling in the state. you can't rani of x. yeah. and then they can use the law and now that has to go in, you don't want to open the door for that for the, for states to be able to find various methods within their own state, the disqualified federal. let's talk about something else, right? when i go to latin america and the caribbean, which i'm sure you guys have gone to. one of the things is always bother me when i go there. and especially with my wife and kids as i go to the beach and there's a guy in the military fatigues and my young gun go. yeah,

my god or something. i don't know that they're putting the stuff out sooner by way . and same thing at the store. same thing at the parks and i've always wanted a man. i'm so glad i live in a country. we don't see the military visually out there. well, guess what? look at these pictures. look at us. this is new york by the way. oh, sorry, i jumped ahead. let's do that story. let's do this. this is not, this is not the some. ok, we are going and some with ok. look at this. this is the some ways of new york city. and there are now troops, a 1000 of them really 250 troopers and 750 national guard. same people we sent to iraq and afghanistan. they're now in new york city, petroleum. and some ways, i don't like the price of freedom break. c price of freaks. what does that mean? i don't know what that means. john stewart said it, i was just ready with it. so i said it's a horrible look. i think that, look,

are we like is wondering, is it costs military is different from the that's my point is, is, can i speak to dare i say 3rd world a little bit. i mean, the military is, you know, it's like foreign parties, not domestic. and it's a little bit strange to see military as pulls the cops doing the job. and the question is, why, why on earth did you have to go to national guard as opposed to using your own police force in order to do the job? what's going on if you would that semester? well, of 3 people, dad and the last couple of months, a conductor had a stroke flushed. a couple of things are going on in new york. i'll take another position. you know, i was retired, don't force me when i go back and look at the guys in my in girls in my agency. i don't know. that's what they look like. and i, you didn't tell me the way the cops are dressed now in fatigues with the ones. if you didn't tell me that they weren't soldiers in a lot of states. i wouldn't know. i just think they, they were cops that are cops have been so military. right. yeah. said oftentimes they're running around in the year. yeah. in times. yeah. they have different

missions like that, like from my point is like you, diversity on this because you are, you've been the previous police officer. but the military, from my point of view, has a job of dealing with foreign advertisers. were sending them over there to do something, which is the reason why it's so bad that they're militarize in a plea for it for the point for so that's with me, gets the citizenry that to me it's, yeah, i got to tell you it's, it's a picture i never thought i'd see, i don't like looking at it and we're not talking about a disturbance or a riot. we're just talking about another day in new york. yeah. and saying troops on the streets in some ways is not a pretty picture. thanks so much guys. for coming in. thanks so much for this conversation. i think this is important. i'm glad we do it this way. this is direct impact. thanks so much for being with us because, you know, our mission is pretty simple. here we are really just trying to not keep the troops in little boxes where you've got to be on one side or another. truth is everywhere . extensions. i'll be looking for you again, right here, where we hope to provide a direct effect. the

take a fresh look around his life kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power, tired vision with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse really one say better wills, and is it just as a chosen few fractured images presented as 1st? can you see through their illusion going on the ground? can

the, the russian states never is as tight as i'm one of the most sense community best most i'll send send up the in the 65 to 5. must be the one else calls. question about this, even though we will then in the european union,

the kremlin media mission, the state on the russians to day and split the ortiz vote net, keeping our video agency roughly all the band on youtube tv services. what question did you say from stephen twist, which is the at the end of the 18th century, great britain began to conquer and colonize australia. from the very beginning of the british penetration to the continent, natives were subjected to severe violence and deliberate,

extra patient. according to modern historic instance, in the 1st 140 years, there were at least $270.00 massacres of logo be both. any resistance to the british was answered with double cruelty. hundreds of natives were killed for the murder of one settler. indigenous australians were not considered complete people. no wild beast of the forest was ever hunted down with such unsparing perseverance has they are men, women and children are shot when ever they can be met with squatter, henry myrick wrote in a letter to his family in england, in 1846 postrel years past these rightly described as blood, so in races, if at the beginning of colonization, there were one and a half 1000000 indigenous people living on the continent, then by the beginning of the 20th century, their number had degrees still 100000 people. despite the indisputable historical facts, the problem of full recognition of the crimes of white australians against aborigines

has not been resolved so far. the person makes gains on the front clearing mines left by ukrainian soldiers. that's all the french present in the 5th book troops and may needs to be sent to ukraine. as far as control the states of trying to get nato allies on the south african presidents around the photos of rails, against the countries biggest opposition policy. asking the us government to monitor the upcoming general election. also this hour, the latest contains beach gets interrupted by pro peace protesters as washington should .