from the you a this week, so cold genocide, joe biden plans to release his budget request for next year on to months where he has failed to pass multi $1000000000.00 requests just about the proxy war and ukraine on the war on gaza. as for palestine up to tens of thousands of being killed with nature, nation weapons, mostly women and children. now hundreds of thousands, phase famine, aid convoys, lifelines carrying food watering medicine. i routinely denied entry to northern guns in what human rights organizations, a cooling, a deliberate starvation of gauze as civilian population by israel. all this off to about the usa, and you can have repeatedly refused. that'd be you and rebecca, si fi. joining me now is someone who wasn't adviser to the palestinian leadership in romano and government in stages negotiations with israel khalid l getting the now senior fellow and director of the program on palestine in post any news writing . it says that the middle east institute joins me now from arlington and virginia calling to thank you so much for coming on. i should say that because those and even the top story in the countries which is supplying the weapons so that the

genocide can, can happen. you, you describe the unprecedented nature then and what is what is happening. i mean, is really sold just posting stuff, videos of the beginning of the students and guys that people on social media can see is yeah, it's, it's, it's actually pretty astonishing what, what is happening in, in to gaza. i mean, we, we've seen over the past 5 months, but destruction of an entire society. it civilian infrastructure, most of its homes, most of its hospitals, all of its universities, hundreds of schools, mosques, churches, i mean, just the basic uh, the, the basic foundations of, of life. and that's, you know, not even, not even counting the 10s of thousands who have been killed, of the 20000 or offends. i mean, the list goes on and on in terms of the scale of destruction. and,

and of course you was, you mention you, we have these videos of israeli soldiers gleefully mocking um the people uh, you know, leading items from people's homes, marketing the people who escaped or were killed in those homes. and, and it's quite horrifying. and all we see on from the west really, particularly in the united states, is either silence in the face of atrocities, including the deliberate starvation of an entire population. and everyone knows this. and so either we get silence or we get kind of newly mouse talking points um, you know, from the state department and white house spokes, people trying to deflect edge or casual i made the headlines of the papers, drinking does understand it. so it says the state, the bottom, oh they, they absolutely understand it. and when, when,

when the president comes out and says, you know, we won't stand for this, you know, clearly, you know, feigning a moral outrage. she personally understands exactly what's happening to the state department of the c. i a certainly the pentagon, the white house, as they all understand, that israel is deliberately preventing humanitarian assistance from coming in. and they've hinted at kind of mild criticism, but they certainly have a tackled it directly. and as of right, you know, rather than confront that atrocity of head on and call it out. they just circumvented by doing these kind of performative air drops and hand wringing when, when the reality is the substance of the policy has not changed. there's been no interruption in the weapons flow to israel. there's been no disruption of providing

cover in the united nations. the cedar, you know that the towing resolution after resolution in order to shield israel from from any critique or org or having to stop this war. and it's, i don't know what, what there is left to say. well, one thing to be said was uh, what the again made the newspapers of the country supplying the weapons for the killing of the you and reported by special invite for me in the past. who said it was all uh, rape on october, the 7th. and you can compare the profile functionality between the oaks at october 7th, resistance attacks. and what's happened to guys since? yeah, i mean there's, there's no question that from us committed very serious work crimes and atrocities on october 7, actually i have a war crimes because a, a occupied people has the right to resist using armed they're,

they're out to use weapons. ok. sure, yeah, i mean there's, there's no question that why are 3 guys in the also, but this warrant attacks as well? well, what i, what i'm saying is, so the way in which hundreds of armed militants carried out those attacks, those were, those are clearly go attacking civilians, killing wanton cooling. that is, those are clearly work crimes. and i mean there's no, you know, we have to in the same way that we can't conflate israel's right to self defense with what they're doing and gaza. we're just committed more atrocities as starving the population. that's not self defense. but i'm just wondering why you called, but i wouldn't argue have only passed the point though. that's what i would argue. that's what a mass and other armed groups carried out on october 7th was also not legitimate form of resistance. i don't think what is in the g as in my home because nelson

mandela would presumably have given it is back in given mandela famously. so the bombing of the restaurants as a legitimate form of resistance under apartheid. yeah, but, but i don't subscribe to that view. um and obviously nelson mandela was entitled to his view. but, but you know, my standard is, is based on international humanitarian law and international human rights law. and the national renew allows saw justified international lawyer and as on struggle. again, talk about buying authorities. yeah. right. so you know, you can carry out armed attacks on, on the military, on any armed group that represents the state. those could be considered legitimate target. no, no, no is really has also have their function. but oh is really is have to fight with the idea. i know. but you know, this is a dangerous path that we go down on when we start attributing kind of collective

guilt. we have to understand, you know, it's the same mindset that allows israel to, to bomb an entire building and say, either, well, they all voted for him as are they all support from ass or a, or, or to, you know, attribute collective guilt to, to an entire people because they are, let's say bureaucrats or civil servants in how mass lead government. i don't think that's a reasonable standard for who qualifies as a combatant or legitimate target. i don't think even targeting a, a, a so called militant in their home while they're sleeping and killing him and his family. i don't think that's legitimate when israel does it and i don't think it's legitimate when i'm asked or any other group does something similar. so sorry you have to be, have you already goshen combatants and civilians. you advised the people in

ramallah who danny are don't have the best of reputations amongst the palestinian people right now. what. so what the palestinian people to just of us to trust these international kind of for a i think that was the quartet, which i think tony blair was associated with for a long time brushes. yeah. pull down to that one. you don't see that. i mean, obviously over the dead bodies of tens of thousands, mostly women and children, at least gaza is on the map. in world opinion now being tie will depart from nature countries. simple. it's a game the rights of the palestinian people. yeah, i mean that during those are 2 separate questions though, i mean whether whether the attacks were morally or legally justified the tax of october 7th. and the question of whether they were represented a tactical victory far from ass. those are 2 different questions. mean yes. how may i scored a tactical victory deliver to shop to these really system in

a way that this, you know, no israeli government or public had had failed before? so that certainly from a strictly psychological and even political standpoint. sure that was a tactical victory but, but again, i think we can't confuse you know, outcomes with, with sort of moral or legal justification. and so the bottom line is, we know we, we, we know these kinds of attacks. they work terrorism. uh, works right. it gets people's attention and, and it can even move the ball politically. and i would say not only terrorism by palestinians, but, but also by israelis and by, by sinus groups. i mean, israel's preparation was very much in large part of result of, of terrorism. very effective terrorism against the, the civilian population in palestine against

a british government and other targets. so terrorism historically has worked but, but that's different. then the kind of miracle question. it was okay by their own tax on civilians are justified. i wonder what it's like very much i should just say in britain, they don't teach much about the here. go and killing british soldiers. that's cool, historically. what's it like being there in washington that the middle east institute, that amongst an amidst the media landscape, that because as far as i can tell in the united states, the media are focused in on the headings, rapes and all sorts of atrocities committed by the i'm us terrorists is that the lens and always really and is now seeing, i mean, do you give credence to bite and they have to walk it back. it 1st went by and said he saw pictures and they headed babies. what, what's your understanding?

well, i mean, certainly the media coverage immediately after october, 7th for weeks and probably longer was quite parentes. it was in session lipstick. it was dehumanizing of palestinians, and errands, and, and muslims, in general. it was, you know, you're responsible, you know, we saw people carrying these stories, these totally unsubstantiated stories liked to be headed babies, which later turned out to be false. um, and there is a, you know, i will say the, the, the media record, the record of us media in particular is, is mixed. there are those who ran with those stories kind of unrepentant lee and you know, we haven't seen really corrections, but we've seen other media. we've seen other media, we've seen our kind of learning curve where certain media have adapted and responded much more responsibly since then. and there is much more coverage and

there's even a little bit. busy more of self criticism and, and i think so you think a video of the new york times responding to the grey, the and electronic into father and others did. right. and i, and i think, i think alternative new sources and social media have helped to create a certain kind of accountability for legacy media like the new york times. and they've had to, you know, they're being held to account for shoddy journalism. and for unsubstantiated claims, and so it's really, it's a mixed picture, i think in terms of the media, it's not all as, as horrible as it was in october and november. and it, it is not at all, i would say, certainly not ideal. um, but but it's, it's hard to generalize. i mean,

certainly some outlets are better than others. um and have improved. others are i have not uh that'll get into y'all's company. you the more from the former advisor to the palestinian leadership in ramallah right now senior fellow at the middle east institute. after this break the spending their juvenile like the rivers, the incredible proportions only my turn now to the latest on russia's presidential election. well, well, well at least turn it up the

the welcome back to going under run it. i'm still here with all that he'll getting the former advisor to the palestinian leadership and romano senior fellow and director of the program on palestine and palestinian is really fast at the middle east institute college. we were talking about the learning co, be it over the decades of to the bodies of tens of thousands of palestinians in, in gaza. why do you think on the ground? i know there may be this learning curve. i understand the sources as a see and then people are the talking against the management at the moment in the coverage of gaza. but even palestine em us has never clearly be more popular. do you see how my says, of having be victorious in the sense of uh, any kind of idea of a democratic election that might take place in the west bank, let alone guys, uh, once the nato, a nation. um, the genocide ends?

well, i mean it's, it's hard to say it's, it's, uh, we don't actually know where dozens, where costs and ends in gaza stand at the moment. it's very hard to do, polling in an environment where people are, you know, constantly just looking for a shelter or trying to not be killed or trying to find some more assault to eat or, you know, get their children to a safe place or to. so medical attention, this isn't and of course when there are frequent uh, media blackouts, you know, where, where the little tricity is, is scarce and people have a hard time connecting their, their phones and other devices to, to the internet. so there's, it's, it's extraordinary difficult to gauge public opinion in gaza in this environment. what we do know is, is that there has been a surge in her mouth as popularity,

at least in the west bank, including in, in east jerusalem and, and among maybe palestinians outside in the dallas, bro. and uh, you know, that is not unexpected because her masses is seen as a group that has withstood this huge onslaught the, the most powerful military in the region. they still have not been dismantled or destroyed, much to the frustration of the israeli political and military leadership. and they're seeing us as a, as a group that has inflicted pain and cost on their occupiers. and so for those reasons we, we expect to see a surgeon and from us as popularity, but we don't know what that would translate into in terms of electronic support. um and i, i think collections are very far off. so what we have then is i'm us perhaps more

popular in the context of iraq, that's kind of send syria libya, a, a and sue the reputation of these major powers that keep talking about a rule of it's based order because clearly they're arming. what's happening in gaza and we have israel now the most dangerous place in the world to be a jew. so this is, this is where they situation is at the moment. um, i suppose, i mean that was um, i mean its not exactly how i would characterize it, but don't tell me how you would because apparently the global south does not support the well. yeah. right. i mean there's that there's going to be kind of sort of the united states there's, there's no question that the so called rules based order has taken a huge hit. i don't know that it can recover. i don't know that the credibility of the countries and states who have claimed to uphold the rules based order in places like you crane. and i don't know that there credibility can ever really be restored

. address with the global south. i mean, certainly with the global south, i think it's not a coincidence that south africa was the country that took up the case of the for genocide against israel in the international court of justice. it wasn't an error of states. it wasn't, it was the majority country, it was so south africa and, and so yes, the global south is, is not only this illusion but quite angry at this very obvious, a double standard and flagrant disregard for the most basic principles of, you know, there's people can debate about self defense and, and when it's justified and what's over the over the limit. that's why we have the laws of war and international humanitarian law. but there's no instance in which the starvation, the deliberate starvation of an entire civilian population could ever be justified

for any military or political. and uh, and so the mirror silence if not tacit or even open support for this policy by these countries i think is, is the vista rated the idea of a rules based order and i don't know that it can recover. and frankly, there's no question about that. um, you know, they're going to and, but, and i think their credibility has been shot to a large extent in their own countries in the united states, in the u. k. in germany and other parts of the west where we've seen mass protests, where we've seen major acts of civil disobedience. you have now an entire generation in the west who are completely disillusioned and who don't buy the official talking points coming from their leaders anymore. there's a major gap between the ruling and leads in places like the us and the u. k,

a n, and the grassroots and the public. and, and we see that every day mean the majority of the population in the us and in the u. k. over whelming, they support a ceasefire and have for many months, but that is not at all where the political leaderships are in these countries. i know that you a sponsored one of the security council resolutions, as part of it, is rotating a place on the security council. but why do arab nations take people again to the blinking seriously and meet up with him? i mean, he's a full military alms consultancy boss. we know lloyd austin, of course, will perhaps be profiting as a director, rape young from the amounts of arms transfer from nato countries to support the israel unpack. lincoln said, i come before you know it as a us extra estate, but as a, as a jew, when he arrived at idea of headquarters intel, of even minutes the genocide, why do our believe does take lincoln seriously?

i mean, newton is going in the past few days. i mean, i think there's a number of reasons. one, it's because it's the united states, even if they dislike very strongly us policy. you cannot ignore the united states, just the mere geo political reality of the united states as a superpower, and that has enormous influence in the region and people. and the just say these are all the money and the ones, the ones you worked with, the both ends you when they went to moscow. and in fact with the king of jordan, refused to meet joe biden, when he hurriedly came over in the past few months. to make some kind of some people to the visit to the region. yeah. that was early on when they, when they refused to, to, to meet with him. he hasn't been, the president hasn't been back. but uh, you know,

moscow eating. yeah. site. i think, you know, that was largely for show, i think at this point palestinian factions are each for their own reasons trying to show that they are committed to national unity. um, obviously the united states is not going to host a meeting that includes how mass and other groups that us doesn't accept. and and so rest is one of the few places that, that can host a meeting like that. russia has an interest in projecting its own power and influence in the region at the expense of the united states. and posted in groups have an interest in demonstrating to the united states that they're not the only game in town. but at the end of the day, you know, russia's influence is going to be limited. russia doesn't have the depths of it's in. busy and it doesn't have, i think the credibility with all palestinian a groups. uh and it also, it just,

it doesn't have the bandwidth itself to do what's needed. i think it's largely opportunistic. you know, that, that moscow is picking this up. well roger measure would normally they deny that, but on the other hand is no jerk russia saudi arabia, the u. a. what's up with the gc no longer following orders from washington in the past few months, whereas historically, i'm sure you, you were close. observer of this, they would do what washington told them to do or yeah, they're, they're not following orders for washington, but they're also not trying to alienate the united states. they are, they are trying, you know, part of can one do that. but as they have been doing that dance, i don't know how effective it is, but we're talking about resumes, saudi arabia, the u, a. e of egypt that depend very heavily on the united states for their own security . and that in the case of saudi arabia that are much closer to i think you've already really sorry, security for me. what are the various regional threats,

including including your on but i'm not even going to run it as close relations valley view. uranium farm is, are visited and it's out in the middle of the night. so i have to be out of the why is it the only that he's to think tags in washington believe that the united states has some sort of umbrella helping, where i'm speaking to you from your role and i'm going to evade the way or south the heck, i know, obviously the, the, the day time is between saturday. any ron, that's something that isn't saturdays. sorry, ruby is interest there. there's no question about it. and i think it, it's not a coincidence that, that it was broken by china and a think it was a clear signal to the united states. but at the end of the day, you look at the saudi normalization arrangement with israel that had been pursued before october 7th. it was and,

and that is still being talked about now. it was in large part to draw the united states back in to provide security guarantees to the saudis, to, to crew, to recreate a kind of us lead security architecture in the region. the saudis want that um and that is the only reason they're talking about normalizing windows really, but i mean, i'll remind you, well, i'm interested you're on denies, has really, really hard that i did state iran has denies any moves in on that. and there isn't certainly any talk about normalization here in this region. i'll tell you that just briefly on trump gas election in november, which i suppose is the likelihood to be even if it's from jail. will it get worse? the situation for the palestinians or given he wants to change in policy, visa the russia, to, to on, with that, with russia. could this pay the way for something follow better than we've seen

under the under genocide, joe is gold. i mean it's, it's very hard to say whether it would be better or the worse, worse or the same as far as this issue. i mean, obviously a trump presidency would have enormous implications for a whole range of domestic issues, but not the least of which is, you know, basic civil liberties. um, uh and, you know, trump has shown himself to be very unpredictable on foreign policy. it's very hard . he does not have a guy reading, vision or ideology. it is all very personal. it's video sing, craddick, and it's transactional and an opportunistic his is approach to foreign policy. so yes, when it comes to playing to his base, he will say things like, we're going to band students who protest so you know, we're going to band palestinians from entering the country because, you know, you have this anti immigrant sense or instead of phobia that runs through the

republican party and so he's going to push those buttons because they're useful for him. but, but in terms of broader issues about deal politics, it's much, much harder to predict what he would do. you know the price to be no, president biden does not believe in putting any public pressure at all, even on the most extreme government and israel's history. and he's now being criticized by his own party in some circles for 2 uh, 2 types of an embrace of, of netanyahu and his extremist coalition. whereas with a trump administration, we don't know what with trump hooked up with a, a, a intransigent netanyahu government in this to the same degree. i think his ego would dictate, uh, he would at least be willing to challenge that. okay,

hold on some things. how does they'll get to the thank you. yeah, thanks for having me. that's it for the show. continued condolences to those bree by the u. k. u. s. u, i'm bombing in palestine 11 in yemen, syria and iraq. we'll be back with a brand new episode on saturday until then keep in touch my last social media. if it's not tense, if you will, country, and have to watch, i don't going underground tv on mobile, don't. com. and watching you and old episodes going undergrads. these have been the hello and welcome to across the full board. here we discussed some real money into the to pick up the book on what to do to fix that amount. apache

sat there for the show and then it will be a job to bluff and it goes into a of a dish. uh, international stuff is defensive to supplement the setup button and the printer in a button once, did you lose your task like that? if i said the media, i love to focus on you to reason can you say was in the city, the new country to be sure to be presented. it was working monday morning to work it on stimulus and just get a little less money in the process really left. so should william farmer shots, monuments who have good guy started over what decision did my name and what was that man? what was that ridiculous problems i put in the best one today and, but you look through the process. so that's what it is that you want to set. i mean shows those are pretty sharp generals on page do to for she's getting those are the best. do what i mean. there's a corporate push out the

of the president of slums and the opposition party request for the us to oversee coming at elections in the country, calling it some attempt to quote some mortgage or democracy also ahead the law. she's a reps in east jerusalem as the idea prevents many muslim from entering the lunmark alex and most of the of ramadan, the region we're in denver. i'd also add on the program. it is the final time done in russia. us citizens gear up to vote in the 1st presidential election since the our break up the in spring conflict on the, on the president at western pressure.