the, the but they must realize that the vampire bull is ending. it's a big chat with inside of me put in the russian president talking about the balance of power changing in the world. and i'll hide raging into view right ahead of this week's presidential election. and washington, announcing a new round of cash for key comes to meet ukrainian troops retreating from frontline positions all across the battlefield. basically, creating a dire situation for the western planet about a show of force in the indian ocean, a russian chinese or the iranian naval forces hitting the high seas of the day to try that rule drills and maintaining peace and security. and that's the

point as far as putting into a big day for your geo political news or what, how to international. it's so good. it was a big and very enlightening sit down headed, but this week's upcoming presidential elections. lot of input in pulse with tv host and ceo of russia is the largest media group, demetrika city of the end of you covering a pied range of topics. so anywhere from domestic issues to the foreign relations and frankly, as per usual pollution did not hold back let's uh, for a moment. check out the highlights. you can usually go to from a military technical point of view. of course we are ready. we have troops in a constant state of combat readiness. it is also a universally recognized thing. our nuclear triad is more modern than any other triad. and only we in the americans actually have such a triad. we have advanced much more here. ours is more modern. the entire nuclear

component, but this does not mean that we should measure ourselves by the number of carriers and warheads and those who need to know, i repeat experts specialists and the military. they know it well. they are now setting the task of increasing this modernity and they have plans to do so. we are also aware of this. they are developing all their components. and so are we. but this does not mean that in my opinion, they are ready to unleash this nuclear war tomorrow. if they want to, what can we do? we are ready to make sure we do not interfere in any kind of elections. and as i have said, many times, we will work with any leader who the american people, the american vote that will give confidence to. but here's what's interesting. even during the last year of his work as president, mr. trump, today's presidential candidate reproach to me for precisely the fact that i was sympathizing with vitamin. this was more than 4 years ago. he told me so in one of our conversations. sorry,

i'll say it like he did. these are his direct words. you want sleepy joe to when he told me this when he was president. and then to my surprise, they began to persecute him because we allegedly supported him as a candidate. well, it's some kind of complete nonsense. as for today's pre election situation, it is becoming increasingly uncivilized. i would not like to give any comments on this matter, but it's absolutely clear. i think it's obvious to everyone that the american political system cannot claim to be democratic in every sense of the word. the most of which, if we return to macro and maybe he decided to take revenge on russia by making such statements for the fact that we step tony's tail in africa box. we had to stand there and be afraid with the property. didn't expect us to be so active that no, no, no, we're still. yes. i think there is some resentment. but when we were in direct contact with him,

we spoke frankly enough about this issue. we did not meddle in africa and we did not squeeze france out of there. the problem is different. the well known wagner group 1st carried out a number of economic projects in syria, then move to other countries in africa. the ministry of defense provide support, but only on the basis that it is a russian group. nothing more. we did not squeeze anyone out. it's just that the african leaders of some countries agreed with russian economic operators. they wanted to work with them. they didn't want to work with the french in some respects . it was not even our initiative, it was the initiative of our african friends. it is not clear why we shouldn't be offended in this regard. if an independent state wants to develop relations with its partners from other countries, including russia, it wants to develop relations with russia. we did not do anything with them, the former french colonizers. i even say this without irony, because in many countries where france has historically been a metropolis,

they don't really want to deal with them. it has nothing to do with us. perhaps it's more convenient to take offense at someone without seeing your own problems. maybe such a sharp, rather emotional reaction on the part of the french presidency, is also connected with what is happening in some african states. although i know other african countries where they are calm about the french remaining there and say that yes, it suits us. we are ready to work with them, but in some countries i don't want to. it has nothing to do with us. we are not instigating anyone. there. we are not setting any one against france. we do not set ourselves its tasks. to be honest, we don't have any such statewide national tasks at the level of the russian state. we are just friends with them. that's all. no deductible. yeah. i don't feel like i'm some sort of master of the world's destinies. believe me not even close. i am simply doing my duty to prussia and to our people who

regard russia as their homeland. as for other countries of the world, it is very closely related to how we are treated around the world. this is interesting. it is such a phenomenon that's for sure. what i would like to draw attention to many people in the world, look at us at what is happening in our country and in our struggle for our interests. this, in my opinion, is what is important. why is this happening? not because we are formerly members of bricks or we have some traditional relations with africa, that is also important. but the point in my opinion is quite different. the point is that this so called golden 1000000000 has been practically a parasite on other nations. for centuries, 500 years, they've been tearing apart the poor peoples of africa. they've been explaining that in america, and they've been exploding the countries of asia. and they certainly haven't forgotten that i have the feeling that it is not even the leadership of these countries, although it is very important. but the ordinary citizens of these countries feel in their hearts what is happening. they associate our struggle for their independence

and true sovereignty with their aspirations for their own sovereignty and independent development. but this is compounded by the fact that the desire to freeze the existing on just state of affairs and international affairs is very strong. in western elite, they are used to feeling their bellies with human flesh and their pockets with money for centuries. but they must realize that the van fireball is ending. all right, let's learn more about us right now, of course, and live to auntie correspondent, fiona isabella, right? the fear relo go, you know, it's kinda kind of tough. what of again, i mean, they told for an hour and a half and such a mix as well. would you take us through some of the highlights, right. very so this a huge interview focused on many social domestic and budget concerns, but of course the ukraine conflicts is the number one thing on many voters minds going into the selection. and so there were many questions about this specifically

regarding piece talks and putting, reiterated russia has never actually backed away from this. but in terms of the fact that nato and the west have reenact and broken every single promise made to russia, including the expansion of nato and the men's good chords among others. he said they would have to have rock solid security guarantees to move forward. not, no good as we have been promised many things. they promised not to expand nato to the east and then we see them at our borders. they promised if we do not delve into history, that the internal conflict in ukraine will be resolved by a peaceful political means. as we remember, 3 foreign ministers came to kiff, poland, germany, and france, promised that they would be the guarantors of these agreements. a crew took place a day later, they promised to fulfill the minsk agreements and then publicly stated that they were not going to fulfill these promises,

but only use the break to arm the regime in ukraine. we have been promised a lot of things, so promises alone are not enough here. just to just keep you to go to talk about almost like right now negotiating just because they are running out of bullets is kind of ridiculous on our part. nevertheless, we are ready for a serious conversation and we want to result of all conflicts, and especially this conflict by peaceful means. but we must clearly understand for ourselves that this is not a pause that the enemy wants to take for rearmament. but this is a serious conversation with guarantees for the security of the russian federation. so now when asked about the weapons deliveries from nato countries to ukraine, put and reiterated that the u. k. that ukraine has already been using this. what these weapons from the us and the u. k, but that they actually didn't do much to change the turnaround on the battlefield or change the end of what's going to happen in reality. and he also mocked the idea of germany sending taurus missiles, calling it

a fantasy. now when we're talking about the session of finland, sweden putting commented that of finland, especially for hearts, it's economy. and it's, it's security by leaving it's neutrality, saying that these countries were better off being neutral. russia didn't have troops, there didn't have weapons there before, but now they do not know. but i thought we had quite good relations stable relations with these countries. and i think they benefit more from the fact that they adhere to neutrality because it gives certain advantages at least as a negotiating platform in order to reduce tensions in europe. we generally had perfect relations with finland. just perfect. we didn't have a single claim against each other, especially territorial, let alone, other areas. we didn't even have troops. we removed all the troops from there, from the russian finish border. why did they do it? they did that in my opinion because of the only political considerations they

probably really wanted to be members of a western club under some kind of umbrella. frankly, i don't understand why they need it. this is an absolutely senseless step from the point of view of ensuring our own national interests. nevertheless, it is up to them to decide they have decided so we didn't have troops there. now we will. there were no weapon systems there. now they will appear. what for our economic relations were very good. they use our market. we bought a lot from them. what's wrong with that? but now the situation will change. to now, the question of troops going into, uh, formally, nato troops going into nato, has been on the minds of many re talking about this. he said, well, there are already mercenaries, and foreign troops on the ground, even joining the escalation of sending formal troops to their would create a geo political crisis that could create something far more catastrophic. now uh, when it comes to, for example, poland,

poland could go in there and put troops through there, and then others could follow. now, pulling would do this because this has been their dream of recuperating some of the land that was given to you. crane after world war 2. so france has also thrown this out there of the possibility of sending formal troops. now this would be a direct conflict with russia. this would mean that they would admit that this is a direct floor. so obviously, the rubber cushions would be catastrophic. and one thing that put in did stress is that the, these rumors that russia will send nuclear weapons to ukraine are absolutely not true. that there is no tactical reason for russia to do this. then one thing i do want to point out that he said was that this is again and existential war for russia, that this is life and death for the nation. and that, of course, this is not the same thing necessarily for europe. and these countries that are

trying to simply change and up their tactical military strategy. so these are very strong statements to make going into the selection. all right, i'll teach, i fear a isabel. thank you. of course it was the publish leadership. and the reason day saying that there are nato soldiers and come on those already on the ground and you can frame it. of course, we've already done enough for quite some time already. read more about pollutants, comments at all. so you thought the sort of more money for ukraine, but a lot less than usual in america, the, by the ministration announcing a news, $300000000.00 for ukraine. the us national security adviser takes oliver and those saying the money is coming from unexpected cost savings, but he's still warned. it's not nearly enough for you, craig, for the long descend. munition will keep your brains guns, firing for a period, but only a short period. it is nowhere near enough to meet you, cranes,

battlefield needs, and it will not prevent you crane from running out of ammunition in the weeks to come. it goes without saying, this package does not displace and should not delay the critical need to pass the bi partisan national security. according to co, director of the international action sent to us are found as believes more weapons only means more that this is really just a band aid of what they're planning still in the pipeline. and us and on western weapons have already completely fail along with western sanctions failing. but nevertheless they continue piling it on. so there's 300000000 is just a little band a to keep the war going. the weapons coming on, and most of this, the weapons are such corruption and ukraine. there's no tracking system of by kind of gone zone estimates more than

a $1000000000.00 and weapons have just gone missing on, accounted for. we sold the whole policy is completely a failure by their own admission by even bouncing now that tore a new one, a one failure after another in this policy. and it's really shown even in the ukraine. they talk about 300000000 more and some weapons, but 300000 military age ukrainians have left ukraine rather than serv. so they're facing a crisis on every front, including with their own population. however, it's very profitable for us weapons manufacturers for the billions that are made and profits on us wars. meantime, europe is basically arming itself to the chief. as you weapons imports of nearly doubled with french and american exports, continuing to rise. and according to sub you, as president, alexander fulcher, she says the confidence causes only one of militarize arch. what is happening now

is madness. they all thought the booting would be easily defeated. now they see that this is not so the current trend is toward total militarization and a 5 fold build up. in all respects, firms, president a measure in black hole said that western troops and ukraine could not be excluded . he also said that he wanted to maintain strategic ambiguity, also known as bossing, which only actually works if you don't announce right after the boss that you could be bluffing. but apparently a menu in the back hole treating the international stage like a local community feed or production and cause playing jeanette. i, regardless, was enough to inspire a bunch of other european officials to take the safety officer on miles and fire off some belligerent rhetoric of their own. sonya, as the soldiers of nato countries are already in ukraine. and i would like to think

the ambassadors of those countries that took such a risk, they know who they are, they are replacing. the president did not say that the russians would advance towards odessa will care of the way i see it. he is preparing public opinion for friends to intervene and this conflict by telling us. and if the from to moves towards odessa or key of what we're going to do is there should be no limits to our intervention. this is how he presents things, but we should not play on the fear of the french. the time of peace is over. the post war era is over. we live in new times in the pre war era. for some of our brothers, this is no longer even the pre will era, but the period of full scale war and it's most cruel version. we cannot continue to feast on illusions. no one will take away all responsibility for fighting for our security and our future. we ourselves are the best guarantor about security and the unity. we need to turbocharged our defense industrial capacity in the next 5 years

. and at the heart of this must be one simple principle. europe must spend more, you must spend better, and europe must spend europe in europe should strive to develop and manufacture the next generation of battle winning operational capabilities. so what do you do when you devastated your own normal economy for you frames and have nothing to show for us? all you announce that you now sell so that defy as a war time country, and attempt to scare up some cash from your tax payers. for the transition, sure, work for zalinski, we need to change the paradigm and moving toward economy mode. this also means that the european defense industry must take more risks with our support. so now what we're seeing is european countries wrapping up defense spending. well, the same time say that they don't really have any cash, just bear for things like social programs or to sufficiently compensate their own

farmers for being screwed over by the use free trade policy favoring ukraine's farming industry over europe's own. don't like it. well then, do you really want russian president vladimir putin rolling right up to the left bank freezing cafe in a battle tact because they're talking like that's exactly where he's literally going to be ordering. walked off from the mid day menu. if the european tax stairs don't start wrapping their heads around the idea that making weapons is now suddenly you're a big priority. so how's that cell job working on the tax stairs? well, 76 percent of french citizens are against french troops fighting russia and ukraine . that's according to a pull from just a few days ago. within the 50 to 64 year age group. that number was markedly higher at 85 percent against. it's all like, even the french establishment is all in lock step on this either from or french, foreign minister, dominique de paul,

who warren washington about the risk of invading a rock 20 years ago. sounds like he's giving a dad lecture. you said you will play out of it. it would have 1st been necessary for us to be able to answer 5 questions. 5 risks associated with this escalation. i think that would be taking this step. so if we were to send troops and fighters by for essex, while some officials are sounding right now, like they're hosting a telephone line for the european military industrial complex, other see spin off opportunities for all this war talks in other industries like bunker construction. there was an urgent need to put the commission to bunker's back into operation, and we need to build a new modern shelters in urban centers. underground car, parks, and subway shaft can certainly be used. we are currently seeing this in key of where people are seeking refuge from russian missiles. we also need to plan for such a scenario in germany, not a bad time to resurrect bunker industry,

actually with energy costs and interest rates becoming a problem for europeans. maybe everyone can just save some money and, and crowded, move in to government funded bunkers and hang out while waiting for food. well, they've been called a gain change in the ukranian conflict. no rush was submitted for defense as ready to take just showing the deployment of a weapon system that has previously on this reputation across the battlefields. what's your, your video highlight? i think i, russia is a suicide. the full frontline vol. not dropping multiple 55 hundreds. and the bottoms have been in most goes austin over decades. but a now retrofit with the wing kids that basically deployed once they detach from there i forced kerio, guided by sutton of that. so i'll get coordinates, a program off to being acquired by ground based intelligence assets and all this is why western experts explained to the washington post. their introduction has quotes from medically boosted the effectiveness of the russian forces. well, let's learn more. of course you live now to an indianapolis veteran and

a full my deputy chiefly integrated stuff. and that's what i'm now joining us here live on all to you international a very well welcome to today sir. i believe you're joining us from trinity where it's maybe 5 pm, so i appreciate your time and getting onto this program network tv. so what do you think of the story is basically, we know about the fab 5 hundreds at that, but that does seem to be right now. no, a big thing in the conflict in ukraine. what can you tell us about this weapon system that is now as i understand a guided system off to being upgraded and retrofit, what do you know what, thank you why it's sufficient to be on the date. yeah, so, but again, when this, well i, i probably would have thought that this would have happened even earlier, the 5, the 50515. the funded uh uh, as soon as i mentioned the bones what we would call it, that would be dropped bombs footage. and then the uh,

very bulky. i expose the weapons, but the conventional mode you do uh, drop blatchley when it goes to the dog and i need to drop it in there normally. you know, uh say that i wanted to live in uh, you could actually drop ms. williams to the dog. i couldn't see i'm not very good in that. nobody had mentioned that low but video no, but be simple, smart bones by sitting in blankets. then the holy game changes the bleed. i mean, what do you do was just sitting in the waves of life, both of those, those things are controlled with a controlled in the kind of some electronic get, but you actually put in there which has a satellite navigation capabilities that made based uh in oh, wow, signal to see above that actually. right, and you can put it in the target information. and you put the also to the target

the information somewhere midway doing that navigation that's with so so i knew i used to offer it. so sort of talking. i do, i do apologize for interrupting you so. so officer is detached from the airplane. it's still possible to program in perhaps updated coordinates for these fab gliding bottoms. now the further go go to that, go to that an intended destination, but fine, can i ask you so because obviously this conflict that is still ongoing in ukraine. many military, unless the saying that the way this conflict has been played out the way it's being executed, it's gonna rewrite the next generation of military planning. i mean, just for example, drones many people saying drones have now changed the face of conventional fact. so if that's the case, what you think comes next. absolutely. the groans of, uh, you know, i brought the enormous uh, you know, capable of the demonstration one. they want to change the compete planning and all based on the planning for the future. that's one. second,

the is the conventional depends, are available in large numbers, but good, so it cheaper to manufacture. and once you put in those gifts, then these become small position weapons. so when they released that they've been like, uh, 1500 or the 5 i have 5500. let's say 40000 feet. you probably would get a range between a think. allow me those to my 20 kilometers. if it looks like 20000 feet, you'll get that in your 40 to 60 kilometers. so you have a tremendous band of release if i'm going to be, i'm still you have a $1.00 to $3.00 me bills of $3.00 to $5.00. me those that get to see, but you can actually get depending upon the intelligence this. now they also use what's not of the total ition that a lot of them to match the dog with the information that's been fed it. uh, this bought a lot of them to use something like on the bottom me bows. and in today's environment, yes. why don't bother me, does enough to get to deal with the kind of pollution i couldn't see that you need i so b, b i. and so the possibility of these that the stickly be i couldn't see is phenomena

than this. and since bombs that are available to infinity, conventional balls from, you know, uh, for years you actually mind if i don't store them as it was, all you need is the, gets to be fitted in and then launched from the raft. i. so this would be, you, would it be a major game changer compete be and along with the bronze, the opponent seen changes complete. so what do i mean? i appreciate you saying that so, but what about, you know, what about the end game here? we've been hearing ukraine saying that they're running out of ammo. we've heard various european countries saying they simply can't produce the ammo for ukraine. we've also heard report saying that russia is making at least 3 times in the military hardware. what the us and the you off putting together come by, it does seem there's a huge discrepancy in the amount of ally being produced on the european american side of ukraine on the russian side. um, do you think we're getting to a point now where a student has just reminded the world rusher is open for very serious conversations

about an end to the conflict in ukraine with more weapons being produced in russia and even less being produced for ukraine in europe. in america, where do you see this going on? do use uh, c piece talks in the not too distant future. i absolutely. uh, believe that to be in game for your brain is to get to the negotiating dave, that the, what they've lost. if anything, i expect, what is the new color to also be occupied by addiction sources? that means the brain when you get lost, if they don't come to the negotiating table only uh that be what the left of the band may be an envelope sent for you with no access to black. see? that's not be. they want to save what the one of the like so they have been in, they've been able to get back to me which think they, but the model with a studios, i'm nothing more than bowie is knowledge. they know exactly how big was expected by

any say, thinking statesman and border patient. and that's exactly what the president put them as being like to me. well, i mean your gains and for any more for your grade, do i click that build the wall is absolutely the factor of the country complete the probably the story that yeah, it's exciting anyone to write some pressure saying as well or. yeah. so i'm the in game i see is to believe within a couple of months, i think negotiations believe in them. and you will probably be seeing a new your brain with what is left out. probably big, most same position to remain neutral. and they both probably would get pushed back . that is provided the europe in leadership setting that auto probably, uh, but the states move on to the full and big some sand musicians in the but i think that's a very good point. of course you call this election happening in america and it just a few months from now and that's booting the said we are ready to work with any leader

and then i could stay. so the american people put that confidence in and that's why the marshal indianapolis better informed, a deputy chief of integrated defense stuff, a real pleasure talking to you today. thank you very much for your time. thank you very much that. thank you. my pleasure being with, i think, looking like a big show of force on geo political solidarity as the message is that of bolstering peace and security the in the pacific region. what am i talking about? try lateral exercises involving the naval forces of russia, china and iran, now entering date to correspond to our explains the russian. i'm chinese naval vessels arrived in iran, southern waters on tuesday, after saving thousands of miles to take part in a joint. drill with it was navy code named maritime security belt. the war games are held over 17000 square kilometer area. and then north of the indian ocean, the persian gulf and the strategic straight up for most is the 5th time. the trio

has stage, joyce enabled exercises with the name of ensuring the safety of global shipping and the indoor pacific region. and so we're the 5th consecutive year dyslexic republican ron has staged a joint try literal labeled field between the neighbors overrun, russia and china with the multiple of together for peace and security process. pacific fleet has deployed flotilla comprising, gets guided missile cruiser, vari, out, and anti submarine destroyer marshall shall polish. think of china has also dispatched as a rule g destroyer, leaning. you forget and don't think who replenishment ship, it won't have centers domestically built destroyers, dental, and joe moran, as well as the shaheed. so the money visual corvette, among other warships, 5 observer nations, a man, azerbaijan, because asked in pakistan and south africa, also participated without deploying naval assets to changes. but he just told me the traditional parts of these exercises and very important for us. it allows us to establish a strong ties between silas from different countries.