right now, well, there isn't one. this last soon to governor saw and killed the mine in question in front of a seek temple. his mother came the, became the cool son of diplomatic changes between new dunny and also a kind of by the, in the over taking him out will, while the form of whole, the accusation of so on how deep seeing these i was need to look at this on a move which english to establish in dependency, states in india solves a lot him labeled a terrorist by the indian government. we spoke to a global citizen unless it says justin to this accusation against india. just political ex, the need to be prime minister of the username, whatever he said is absolutely right. there is no evidence of the statement which she just didn't know made was basically because of his father to go by chance. uh

and not because on substantial evidence. oh, supported oh oh, don't support it by then. the fact that he is not as good anybody that does know can be based without. uh they're looking at getting involved. uh it was a case of gamble. obediently and there was more evidence, an open and more evidence of connections within. so that is why, what does that part? is that between 5 a numbers that then nobody would ever like to him, but it's a beautiful but nobody also, it is a question that often there is a reason to believe that it was more of a homeowner to go statement just to be a buddy's. but to go to the white glove and to perhaps improve other things with drug waiting don't that he is not the perhaps managing the communities in the book is taking for the chinese media edge. i didn't talk my of the us house of representatives the highest possible that would force his parent company to sell

american lives to a us base buyer. somebody is, pharmacy says the legislation may come back to vice washington to attach the bodies and do this all in recent years. although the united states has never found any evidence of tech talk. so coal threat to its national security, it still has never ceased. the suppression of tech talk, this kind of conduct a, resorting to bullying and a failure to win in a fair competition. disrupts normal business operations, frustrates international investors confidence and undermines the normal international border of economics and trade. in the end, it is bound to come back to bite the us itself or who has res online either across america, the head of the x that look a little in law says the case may create a dangerous press of for main data companies in general, not just sit and talk,

the tests satisfy succeed, says the bill is more about citizenship, speech security. having said that, even the smallest of the staging site quote, lack of governmental control over the social net, was as well the reasons for the action that we filled with global and political hours. i x report of why he says by and take talk would actually bring more home to those of us and told us that most of it would be on the platform. this is part of america's ban bomb and the bully intimidation. they thrive on these 3 words where they should take some advice from china here. and that's 3 words that are very popular here in china. it's called the belt road initiative, and they're building relationships all across the world with over a 150 nations. now, what's this going to do to a chip talk? well, as you said at the start, the time is ticking. i think it's sticking for 7000000. small businesses in america

that will be affected by this. a 170000000 users in america will also be affected. now that's coming up on an election year. i think americans were the people in the senate that are potentially have the power to pass this should think twice and really their constituents and may be less about their lobbying, wrestled america has a lot of america outside of america, and they have lots of it in china, china, or major major consumers and a lot of companies here are connected. i mean, these relationships are intertwined. i think it's uh, cooler heads that should prevail. we hope in the senate, and this to just be a non starter. for most part, people are getting on with their lines are living happy lives here they're moving forward. this is a country that has spread across the world, its influence with the belts and root initiative where america has been left in the cold. and they, they feel very vulnerable right now that just that day is it for those are his 1st

as a is in the russian lead to an in depth interview with the local media. part 2 is coming up next. and what was the back of the top of the latest news? one of the, or the what do is not. so if q, mister poor, when the front line situation seemed very tough last year, for example, in hard cover, her son did the idea of resorting to tactical nuclear weapons ever cross your mind of dismissal, just a, there's a for a living. what for additional? although at the suggestion of the people who were in command of that group, then we decided to withdraw our troops from carson. it was not by any means assigned the front line was collapsing there at least nothing even close to that. it was the only reason it was done was to avoid unnecessary personal casualties.

that's it. that was the main motive, because an absence of ways of supplying the footholds on the right river bank, we would have separate unjustified casualties to avoid that the decision was taken to relocate to the left bank. yeah, we saw later that we had made the right choice when ukrainian commanders tried to gain a foothold on the left bank in cranky, for example. they were basically pushing people into the meat grinder. there were people running around barefooted there, literally, which i mean literally, they were using speed boats and drones to supply them with ammunition. what is it slaughter they were sending them to slaughter? once i asked the chief of general staff and i can tell you, there is nothing secret about it. listen, who do you think is making these decisions on their end? surely whoever is making them must realize they're sending people to certain destiny, said that they do realize. so i asked them, why are they making these decisions? and it doesn't make any sense. no sense at all from a military standpoint. he said, then why? he replied, well,

i suppose it comes from the top political leadership driven by political considerations. they believe that there's a chance of them breaching our defenses. perhaps they hoped to gain additional funds by claiming they have a foothold on the left bank. it's also about presenting that position favorably. it international meetings. once the orders are shoot, all the subordinate commanders simply comply might that are showing you when you might. and by the way, the prisoners who surrendered and were taken captive there, revealed they had little understanding of the situation they were getting into, which would be some, one fresh units are deployed there. they're told that the defense is solid there and they're told to keep pushing to help others out. but they couldn't even make it to the left bank. a tragedy in an absolute tragedy from their perspective. so why resort to weapons of mass destruction? there has never been such a necessity for that k. what's the about? so this thought has never crossed your mind that you know, why would it, what weapons are made to be used to? we adhere to our principles, which dictates that we are ready to deploy any form of weaponry,

including those you mentioned in defense of the russian state. when our sovereignty and independence are under threat. it's all laid out in our strategy, and we haven't changed it. but it's just a president when the outgoing president boris yeltsin offered you to run for office, your initial reaction was on not ready and you got the thing. that's right, those are my exact words to forward. you have certainly come a long way since then. if you had to write a telegram to yourself at the time, what would it say when you have to, you know, it'd be like a yankee in king arthur's court or something. it is impossible to answer this question. now. back then this question was raised at a certain time in a certain historical and economic context that the country was in, in a certain internal political situation that had developed in terms of internal security. and all of that together prompted me to answer. i'm not ready for that. let's not because i was afraid of anything but because the scale of the task at

hand was simply enormous. and the number of problems was growing day by day, like a snowball. we have so we have the i gave a frank answer at the time. it's not because i repeat, i was afraid of something. my stuff is not match. but because i didn't think i was equipped to solve all these problems. and god forbid, i would make things worse. that's what it was about. ok. so i said that frankly, and if i were to go back in time, i would have answered in exactly the same way to at least possibly be what was the decisive factor. then after all, you did run the probably conversations with the president yeltsin. what did he tell me back then? he said, okay, fine, i understand. we will return to this later. and we did return to the conversation repeatedly. eventually, he said, i have vast experience. i know what i'm doing, what i'm suggesting. well, and there was some other things he said to me,

i guess it would be awkward to complement myself. he said positive things about me later, he reiterated it in a very positive way. i won't talk about it now. and when you get to work, it all feels very different. you know, when you work, you think this, this and this must be done immediately, this, now this tomorrow. and so it goes on and on and on. once you get into it, it's a different story. session database to see if there's no time to be afraid, any more video and stuff. it is not the method of being afraid, but of comprehending the issues and being able to solve them. you remember what 1999 was like in the economy in the field of security and everything in finance? the cars about if you once mentioned the entry leningrad state university, preparing for this was a turning point for you. it was a situation where you had to go all in realizing either i do it now and succeed with it, and then it will fulfill the plans. i have and you intended to work for the kids.

you be at the time already where i lose and then everything is different, then a chance is gone. is russia now also in a position where you have to go all in? so like the 1st the, this was not my situation at the time. yes, i wanted to work in the state security service was completely on the booth with entering university was at a turning point. how did it feel? was it a either or moment? that's almost uh, not quite sure, but you know, i just came to the cage of the office and said, i would like to work here like i met you. how do i do that? because the alternative was simple. i was told that i either needed to have a higher education associate, preferably a low degree, or to have served in the army or to have at least 3 years of work experience. but it is better to serve in the army. so if i haven't gotten into university, i would have joined the army. yes, it would have meant a longer pass to the goal. i had set for myself, but it was an option. there's always an alternative route this to but it was it

difficult to pass exams? i'm actually which was the 2nd yes, of course because i went to a chemistry and math school and here i have to pass the liberal arts. so i have to good one thing aside and focus on the other. it's nothing. yes, of course it was difficult. i had to learn a foreign language on my own germans. in my case, i had to study history literature, and so i wanted them to receive rushes, also at a crossroads right now. since it either succeeds or not, i see, and the pressure is not at the crossroads. it is on the strategic path of his development and will not turn off it's past, rest assured, it's if by difficult, to what extent do you feel the support of russian society and it's new capacity because of russian society has developed this new capacity, right? and then we'll look it as being there before. but now it has many festive itself. and it is great that we have given this cor,

russian society an opportunity to express itself. my feeling is that people have been waiting for this for a long time. the common man would be called upon by the country by the state, and the fate of the country would depend on them is that which way and this feeling of an intrinsic connection with the motherland, with your homeland, of paying a vital role in accomplishing it's key go issue, in this case, in the field of security, which is what has brought us might of the russian and other peoples of russia to the surface of the price. and do you feel nurtured by it should always it's not about the feeling nurtured by it. what matters is that i see this public demand. this is the most important thing to meet the public demand so much i as long, but it's time to acknowledge that you play a key role, not only in russia, but also globally because billions of people pin on you their hopes for international justice, for the protection of human dignity and traditional values. what is it like to bear

this enormous burden of responsibility? scratch on the chest. that is interesting. sure. to be honest with you, because i don't feel it. that's all i see. i simply work in the interest of russia in the interest of our people. i'm sure i understand though, you know what you're talking about and i'm ready to comment on it. but i don't feel like being the master of the world destination. that's not the case. believe me, i'm not even close. i simply fulfilled my duty to russia and to our people who consider a rush of their homeland speed. it has for other countries, i sits closely related to how we are perceived worldwide shift. that's indeed an interesting phenomenon. what's important to note here, and you're absolutely right about this, is that many people around the world seemed to be watching us, looking at what's happening in our country, looking at us fight for our national interests. why is that happening? you may ask, not just because there's this national career, formerly

a member of bricks or have a history of warm relations with africa. that is important. yes. but i don't think that's the main point is the point, is that the so call it a golden building, has essentially been leeching off of other nations for at least 5 centuries. now they tore apart, entire african nations exploited latin american ac in countries. so nobody has forgotten that, and i have a feeling that it's not just the leadership of these countries. although that's very important to also the ordinary citizens who feel it in their bones who know what is happening in reality. and our struggle for our independence and true sovereignty nurtures their own hopes for their nations sovereignty and independent development. it's all further accelerated by western a lead for assistant desire to keep the existing status quote, the unjust state of international affairs. over the centuries they've become accustomed to feeling their bellies with human flesh going on within their pockets

with money. but even they must understand that the vampire ball is ending as a country there. what are you renting it there as you put it in your dress colonial practices, is that what you're talking about? it's talk. sure, but that's exactly what's happening. so please know what you've just painted a completely fair picture of people seen some hope in russia. but how does it happen, that western propaganda with all lips, my colossal resources and tools, has failed to cancel out russia by completely isolating it and distorting that's image, even though it tried in the minds of billions of people. how does it happen? see some of them which to to a truth because of what i mentioned just now is more important to people. it's what people all over the world feeling their hearts. they don't even need medic. explanations for the unfolding events. financial sense, please let them know. even despite this whole flood of mud, no substance from that. yes indeed, but they are also fooling people in their own countries. and it works in many

countries. and they believe that it serves their interest because they don't want to have such a huge country as russia and their borders. the world's largest country, in terms of the territory and the largest in europe in terms of population. our population is not that big in global terms that compared to china or india, but we have the most populous country and we are of you. and now we're the 5th largest economy in the world. why would they want such a competitor? i think it's better to do with some american experts suggested to divide russia into $34.00, or 5 parts. that way it would be better for everyone. that's what they're thinking and they are blinded by this. well, at least part of the western elite is blinded by their russell phobia. they were happy to have brought us to the point where we attempted to use force in order to stop the war unleashed by the west and ukraine since 2014, and had to launch a special military operation. they were overjoyed, i think,

because they thought that's how they finally do away with russia. with this barrage of sanctions, almost the sanctions war declared against us with the war waged by the hands of ukrainian nationalist is assisted by western weapons. they thought they would finish off russia b, i guess that's where the slogan came from. being the call to inflict a strategic defeat to fund russia on the battlefield. but later came the realization that this was unlikely and even totally impossible. they realized that instead of inflicting a strategic defeat, they were faced with impotence. despite is relying on the power of the almighty united states. they found themselves impotent against the unity of the russian people, fundamentals of the russian, financial and economic system, its stability, and the growing capabilities of russia's armed forces. and that's when they started thinking those who are smarter about the need to change their rushes strategy. my next door to that's when ideas emerged to restart the negotiating process to look

for ways to end this conflict and to find where rushes, real interest life. these are dangerous people by the way, to store because it's easier to fight those who are guided by literally principles . remember what they used to say in all dress. that some people's notion of common every day happiness was limited to having enough to eat and drink and the nose full of snuff. it's easier to deal with such people, those who only care to have enough food and drink and the nose full of snuff, meaning they used to sniff tobacco. now it's a cocaine of their noses, right? but it doesn't matter. it's easier with such people. but the smart ones are harder to deal with, they're more dangerous because they influenced people's mindset, including that of our people. they promote their whims, disguising them as carrots for us. you know, did this already when you asked about the possibility of negotiating process? but that's also where the disagreements within the western communities stems from.

it's an obvious thing. we're not going to split them up. they'll do that themselves with brilliance. but we will certainly guard our interests, somebody union that should reduce non new god. i can't help asking mr. poodle about the attacks on the belgrade and curse regions, the military actions taken place in the russian regions. the adversary has become more brazen. do they send something? why is that so obvious theme sion best. the explanation is very simple. all of this is happening because of their failures on the front line. they haven't achieved any of the goals they set for themselves last year or more over our armed forces have completely seized the initiative. everyone knows this. everyone acknowledges this. i believe there's nothing new here, but they need to show something to compensate for those failures. primarily focusing on the information aspect along the state border. the adversary attempted to attack primarily with sabotaged groups. if the latest report from the general

staff talks about up to $300.00 people, including foreign mercenaries, the enemies losses amounted to over $200.00 people. around 230 of the 8th tanks deployed the enemy, last 7 of the 9 armored vehicles, 97 of which were the us made of bradley's other armored vehicles were also used mainly to transport personnel. they bring them drop off and immediately leave . i'm speaking about the belgrade section of the border. i'm a bit further south. it's much smaller in scale, i believe. but nevertheless, i am sure that their main goal is to disrupt the presidential elections in russia. or at least interfere with the process of citizens expression of will. this is number one. see number 2. it's the information aspect i mentioned earlier. and number 3, if anything works out, they are hoping to get a chance, a point of advantage, a trump card in the future negotiation process. we'll return this to you if you

agreed to return this to us. as i said before, it's easier to deal with people whose main concern is to have enough to eat, drink, and sniff, because you can foretell what they're going to do. they will also do this in some other areas. we can see that, why not sure, what's my ultimate load? a, mr. poodle. we've mentioned the episode when you saved your children from a fire, and now you already have grandchildren. because in this country, would you like to leave to your grandchildren look like the other one with that, let me know. sure. and the 1st stage we need to complete somehow everything that was announced in the address to the federal assembly. a few days ago, we have big and concrete plans related to economic growth. a social sphere support for motherhood childhood gets to assemblies with children and pensioners. we've talked very little, not at all about this slightly, but we're allocating the resources needed for that on us. i'm talking about pension

indexing, various social benefits, it's a long term care for people who need it. and i would like to say that it's to the older generation that we owe the fairly solid and stable statehood and economy that we have today. because russia's economy managed to endure all the ups and downs, the severe hardships of the 19 ninety's thanks to the heroic efforts of these people during the economic recovery after the great patriarch war. therefore, we should never forget about the merits of the older generation. we should always remember and give them due credit providing for their well being today. but the future belongs to our children. so i've already talked about motherhood and childhood program. but to do all this, we need to rely on the economy. and i hope to see it more technologically advanced, modern, based on the latest achievements in science and technology just by

t a i robotics genetics and so on. book how fast our agriculture is growing and their to modern technologies are needed. they are actively used and will continue to be used, and of course the country will be self sufficient. in terms of national security and defense, we need to multiply all of this many times over and the future will be secured. it will to ship with a speech spicy moment. thank you mr. prudent. that. if your confidence is contagious, i wish you success in your noble endeavors. thank you. the oh, the the

the 1st time in history and meantime country's culture has been cancelled them even more than welcome to cancel the culture they need to ask the associate and my last so little in the truck, it just me sitting the one a who puts the glue, the phrase now particularly refers to canceling russian culture. and yet the worst it could be of see what was the zip code where he lives, books to which ville renewal that is charlotte, so that the most of the separate shalanda m e. the moines, blood rushes created the pos 1500 years. there's no questions actually condemned, reviled and reject it to sit alone and use that a to put somebody at the middle of panel. there's a lot,

i don't know because i don't know. she doesn't have to use it. a little symbol does is joining total condemnation grows daily and now includes just asking you to call skate shostakovich. get that i need to. yeah, that was quick enough but yeah, she thinks that would just be the w. i'm an e u. k. the russian states never as tight as i'm sort of the most sense community best not getting hold of all sun set up the in the system must be the one else calls question about this,

even though we will then in the european union, the criminal, the mission the state on the russians to day s r t. suppose next, even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube tv services for the question, did you say steven twist, which is the in 18? 81 began to expand its property in north africa. france decided to attack the

invasion, began with a bomb bartman of the french fleet on coastal cities. and was followed by sending in the ground through the french easily occupied one of the key cities, these air j and the bay of doing this bomb. at the 3rd us deep agreed to humiliating negotiations. the bartow trade, he concluded with a colonialist, establishing a project to rid of france, overton easier. however, the people loved an easy, i would not surrender to the enemy. at the call of the islamic clergy, the june easy as rose to a holy war against the invaders. the soldiers of the bays army also joined the resistance. the branch groups did not get an easy walk. vieira patriots bought desperately, but failed to defeat a huge and well armed army, which was supported by the strongest sleep. within a year the rebels where defeated. this turned out to be a real tragedy for the country. about one 7th of the population together with the

fighters left for neighboring libya. thousands of people died during the warfare. the french leg was raised over to an easy. the colonial authorities tried to deprive the country of its air of identity and populated with european settling. such an easy instead now brought up with the loss of freedom era. patriots had been fighting against french colonialism for decades until june easier gained the independence in 1956. the water is a part of the leg, isn't it? but it would post to isn't the defense you of us in that, in the word? or is it something deeper, more complex might be present there?

let's stop without please, is that scope out of the but they must realize that the van viable is ending the less than a thinks about the shifting products of power in the world and doing his wide ranging interview edit this week. but for the next 5 minutes, international approach cobra's human rights organization hasn't gotten to the us find to establish a modifying portal in gaza, according to the watch, so supplying helpless by step 10, not in the face of the solver official from new zealand speaks of the gates his lesson, i like you said, there's no evidence to support the documentation that india was involved and.