of periods, we did not need products to be imported into iran, import of hospital equipment during the corona, virus was almost all necessary. we produced all the equipment such as ventilate, as in breathing devices in a wrong. we reached the stage of exposing both bucks and as and medical equipment in the field of corona. there is a generally accepted notion that all science and technology are supposedly located in the west. how can it runs experience, break this stereotype to mount off or do the 30 years ago? we might have thought that people's lives would be in trouble if they would know weston products at 1st, during the, in post war with iran and iraq war. and then the sanctions let us to a self belief that we can change. this was the slogan that the leader of a ron instilled in our society and our lead society that we can meet this. we con, makes us seek to meet our own needs in the face of sanctions. so sanctions became an opportunity for iran law and what kind of opportunity?

well, i mean, what is the products that used to be imported from the west would no longer important. so a new space was created for all professionals to find the market and make those products domestically for sacha, supposing relations were also provided, of course, the government also set good standards that not every product is produced and only products that have a good quality level of purchase, therefore, the opportunity of sanctions cools the number of knowledge based companies to increase from several 100 companies to several 1000. we found that the most important possibility that the sanctions provided is that tens of thousands of university graduates were employed in these companies. the government agencies of the organizations and companies could not import from a broad as for it because their economy was crippled at all yet. so they became interested in buying these products. and now very good share of a wrong needs is provided by these knowledge base companies. now, it is not us who are losing profit. it is the west and european companies who lost

the iranian market force on china, our airlines main partners when it comes to politics, economy and even science and technology. how does cooperation with russia and china work in power? these technology park can have there been any joint projects with these 2 countries cheating, red we'll see in china in russia. are iran strategic partners in terms of technology cooperation. the biggest history of technological cooperation is between iran and russia, which goes back about 40 years ago. joined high tech companies between iran and russia were formed in the wrong and then vice versa. this experience happened in russia. this was formed in the field of medicine and several joint companies are located in the parties technology park. this experience led to this technology partnership with some companies in other countries as well. we now have more than 10 companies in potties technology park that are ronnie and with foreign partners in the field of various high tech products. next,

this happened with china with the shared experience of nano technology between iranian and chinese organizations throughout the campus technology park. we now have co operation agreements with several technology parks in russia. we exchange offices with each other. and the same thing will happen that the next level with china, so that we can continue to develop cooperation between our companies on by that. so this is enjoying that, rick sanchez on direct impact fees up. max will be back on the top of that list that i have just views on the power button. just to remind you once again that we're going to soon be one of the most watched news and information shows on the planet why? because we are committed to context and we are committed to truth in this edition. we're going to take you through the weeks big event. so some surprising ones,

like america's most established jewish politician attacking the israeli government . i'd actually say would be that then. yeah. who you got to go don't just like that . so i'm not surprising news. like when russia is president, put me was re elected by a whopping 87 percent of the vote. and the media here and all throughout the west side. yeah. course cheated. color, just 2 of the big stories that we're going to be following for you. i'm rick sanchez. this is direct impact the, the okay, we're going to start things off with schumer, frankly, i was surprised by this. i didn't see it coming method you know and put in as well, but i wanted to again, by introducing you to our panel, political scientists, dr. wilburn leon, political analysts. garland nixon, both are hosts of the critical, our on spot. the big news, if you like,

the way i did that with my voice, i know we're crescendo. does i introduce you guys? thank you very much. let's get started with schumer, chuck schumer, the highest ranking, do it's american elected official. you know, of the united states of america, and this week he has been going after being isn't yeah, who somewhat you could say almost what a vengeance. the fact that he's doing it is a vengeance. in fact, when the yahoo asked if he could come this week to speak to congress, the pro schumer wrong, and to touch and, and to get close to his friends. humor said, no, you can, i don't want you and congress, you can't come here. you can talk your schumer as a lifelong supporter, it is really is become clear to me and that's in yahoo coalition. no longer fits the needs of israel after october, 7th, a scholar next. and what do you make of that? well, this is a change in rhetoric, but it's not a change in policy. i think people are, you know, that are concerned about what's going on in guys are seeking some things that will

show them that a policy has changed some concrete. we're not going to send if we're going to do that some announcement by the, by an administrator. and this is just another rhetorical move to pacify the people that are angry. and i'll add this. i think that i don't that they are prohibiting yahoo from coming here. because they know they'll be massive of people in the streets, they'll be angry, people making a lot of noise and they'll suffer as a result. do you think that the schumer was put up to this by the white house and maybe even specifically by the present the united states because he did what the president can't do because the president is not jewish. did you follow that? i did, and i don't think that it was the white house that put him up to it. i think there are other is really interests that that put him up to it. and notice he did not call for a cease fire. he did not call for an end to the genocide in gaza. me and i think chuck schumer has been served. notice that netanyahu is dead man walking as it

relates to put is really pilot, though the intel says only 14 percent. and this is true. what i'm about to say apparently only 14 percent according to polls in israel, say they want him to remain as the prime minister after the guys and situation he's going to be indicted and he's already been indicted. but he may very well be convicted and sold by it, and then in, in uh and schubert, they're not gonna put their money to it. so is that what you're saying? what you're saying is it, does it, don't you're saying, rick sanchez? don't look at this as a sign that the us agenda or the us policy and as well as changing the throwing this guy under the bus. but it's not like throwing the policy under the bus. oh, absolutely, the girl is asking the right, the policy hasn't changed. it's just the players, the pieces on the chessboard are being are being because look at it and humor made the point about netanyahu's colorless coalition. yeah. and what did he have to do to make that coalition move farther to the right?

yeah. and he still said, by the way, if you listen to schumer, speech, which i carefully did because i happen to be on a plane to actually read it. and he says in there that it's a joint state and it has the right to defend itself. and he says, all the other talking points in defense of what i think you were saying. luckily, i think another thing that's important is that a letter has recently surface from a number of donors that uh, that was complaining basically their complaint is that because of the push back we're getting from the democratic constituency. it looked like this good move. donald trump in a position to win, simply as a result of mainly and principally as a result of the policy. so again, so you're saying a pack has a lot of money and that you from time to time to influence american elections. is that what you're such a little bit, but i think what we've got there are other donors regarding insurance, and i think these donors are concerned that they won't get the return on their, on their investments. but i know they have a lot of money to be made. let me now remove my tongue from the side of my mouth as i continue with the next story. the western media was beside itself after the

president's presidential elections and russia put in the election as they called it, even though all. busy of even the western balls show that problem is a very popular person. the media treated his when as if it was a personal insult to them that he one. here's a sampling the outcome was never in doubt. this may have been an election, but it certainly wasn't a contest. it was stage, manage the crime and controls absolutely everything including the elections. so what's the point of them or? yeah, so what is the point of them? i guess i would point out and you guys might or may not agree with me that if you go with what they're accusing button being and that is somebody who essentially cheated electronically. i would add to you. i would remind you that president biden was about 5th when he was elected president. he had bernie in front of me, had elizabeth warren and we had buddha, judging from them, and somehow the party manipulated it. so he would go to the top. so that's manipulation. and if you want to talk about authoritarianism though,

there's not one single person in the republican party who's afraid to take it on donald trump because they're afraid it's going to hurt them. who knows? personally, professionally, maybe even physically you say watch? well, i say 1st of all, to those so called commentators are pundents from the west that are talking about the election was rig. where's the evidence of such, please present some evidence? well, they would argue they would argue fairly, that a lot of the people who take them on somehow or either disappear and i don't mean because they're killed or anything like that. of course involved is a different case. but i think that they would argue that usually his opposition lose his strength somewhere along the way, and they say that's well and here's how, how they do well, argument let's so let's look at this. he won. is the largest turn out in, in, including the history. uh so voter turnout is an indication of something. yeah. uh he one was 86 percent of the vote. mm hm. and he had an appraisal rating of about

what's 747580 saying to 82, well, okay. so when you're, when you're turn out as high, when your approval rating is 86 percent and you went by 86 percent. the data seems to tell me we call it in statistics, gifts to statistically relevant correlation. yes it is. yes it is. and i think that's a fair point and i think it's hard. it's funny. i made this point when i covered the story earlier this week, i said i looked it up. and most of the western post stars that russian kremlin pollsters breasted balls there's most of them german went in. there's. that's that this stuff went in there and the other ones are determined that basically he, he went up 9 points in the last year. well, in fact, the lovato center, which is a, an organization that is funded, we learn from weekly cables and we bought a center is funded by the national a, the usa id. right. and that's the prism of democracy. all right, so it's, it's, it's funded by us intelligence operations, if it for effect. and you can go check the data right now. as of february,

they had it with an 86 percent approval rating. so apparently, whatever shenanigans he used only got them another 1.2 percent and we probably should move on because we have a lot of stuff to talk about. but i will say this, i am mystified by why members of the us media use that i could you could not like put and that's okay. if you don't have to like people you don't like that . you don't like the lot have to like the president of it as well or the president of the bible. you're the president. many that but why it is that they follow the talking points that are given to him by the state department and you make a good point. give me some facts. what can you say like you say he cheated? how did you cheat? well i, we don't say how he cheated. we just say he treated because they'll say, department says so if i don't look at yourself in the mirror at the end of the day and say, why am i just what am i a puppet? yes. okay, we'll leave it at that. i want to show you because i think you're right. i mean, i think there's no device for just saying things without being able to bring up. that is what i want to show you. one of the stuff. busy is that thanks to julia and

assigns and wiki legs, we know a lot about this is an attack in 2007. i want you guys to watch this now where us soldiers, they take out to reuters photographers and you may remember it. and then they laugh about it and when the ambulance has come to take these people out, these are reporters, really photographers for reuters. they should have the ambulance acting all the while as if they're playing a video game. and they're joking about it and laughing about it, it's tough to listen to i'm, i'm showing you this because there's weren't this week that they are talks to possibly free julian a song here it is 18056 individuals with 47 by them all up to traffic to 62 . sorry about that. good. if i had to go

on to shoot during claire claire. oh yeah. like that right there. the way we just drove over a body, a ha, ha ha, ha, ha funny. if not for julian. massage, we don't know that those things happen. we should know that those things happen, not because i want to praise assad's not because i hate the united states, but because we need to be transparent, we need to be truthful and we need to learn from our mistakes. how am i wrong? well, you're absolutely right, and it's the release of this video. that is one of the key elements, which is why julian assigns while not being held up in the ecuadorian embassy in london. and why he's been in bel march prison up to this time. because those are what are known as war crimes. and that's direct evidence of the united

states being involved in war. crime is that it, it shouldn't be, it is a lot to embarrass your country. i understand if he's giving out nuclear secrets or something like that. but he didn't do any of the paint basically. and the reason i do believe right now, i don't know what you guys think the reason i believe right now that the white house, the justice department may actually be considering doing a deal where they lower his charges to a misdemeanor. is because there's a lot of pressure on the united states right now. gaza ukraine. they don't need this guy coming over here. and hank ups and people like rick sanchez showing this video every day. yeah, well yeah, absolutely. i agree. of course there's the, there's the electoral issue, they've have enough problems the, the late, the lease they need to do is to put pressure on their people in the media because their people in the media will be called out as to whether or not they're supporting another publisher, i think another important issue here is that within the call, within this case, there are some actions that the government that have that have taken such as spying on the spying on the defense team,

which let's face it if that gets to the supreme court, they're going to have a difficult time, not throwing this out. do they really want to take a case with this holes? is because this case has to the court are you so why do i hear you saying you say that a sondors lawyers are on to something and they might have a breakthrough in this thing. but i think, i think there are several kind of deal with there. yeah, there. i think there are several issues in this case that would make it difficult for the cost for the, for the, for the government, the product that wouldn't be no installation real quick before we go to break. you agree? oh, i agree, a 100 percent and the, the, the united states government does not want. julian decides to set foot on american soil. they were holding and praying that he died in belmore lies because of to, to a garland articulated the, the optics, the well, the optics of it. and it's gonna force western media to deal with the real. 7 all of these that donald trump looked into having him assassinated when,

when my compo was ahead of the c i a while they spied on his, on his council, they, what you're thinking, a lot of stuff is going to come out of a lot is not exactly in defense of the 1st amendment, speaking of the 1st amendment, when we come back, i'm going to tell you what some of the supreme court members are saying about freedom of speech. maybe it's not that big a deal. maybe we ought to move it aside because after all the government's interest come 1st or do that, you're gonna hear it for yourself. do not go away. the

hello and welcome to across the full board. here we discussed some real in the the, the hey, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez along with carla nixon and wilber leon. and i wanna thank my of these gentlemen for joining us too, so we can have his illustrious conversation, illustrious on your part, i'll do the best i can. all right, we were talking just a moment to go about the 1st amendment of the united states of america and something else happened this week happening to do it. the 1st amendment this week, the supreme court, whose job it is by the way to interpret and in essence defend the constitution of the united states actually made some comments that seem to suggest that maybe it

doesn't think of. busy that much of the 1st amendment of the constitution, yours just as good times you brown jackson, seeming to suggest that maybe we ought to push freedom of speech. you know, maybe it ain't that important in some cases. so my biggest concern is that your view has the 1st amendment, ham, stringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods. i mean what we, what would you have the government do? i've heard you say a couple times that the government can post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, um, you know, kids, this is not safe, don't do it is not going to get it done. i am a journalist, i was trained as a journalist. it's all i know it's all i've ever done in my job drop. when i listen to this, i want to hear which one of you guys want to want to go in and want to take the 1st crack of this thing. what do you think? well, she's doing the job, she's been sent there to do. huh. the empire is in serious trouble. it and it

will let me, let me take a step back. the 1st amendment when she's talked about it, hamstrings, the government. yeah. she's saying, well, the government should have a right to supercede the 1st amendment in a case like, for example, with vaccines that people shouldn't have the right to go on on, on, on social media and criticize vaccines for example. because that hurts the government's message. i don't know if she's ever read the 1st amendment because it starts by saying the government shall make note that she is hands during the i've read the constitution. thank you. i. every much, especially when i was the no law the it's called a negative. right? yeah, because it starts with the government shall make no law. uh huh. in fritz it is pretty close to it. right. is protecting us against the government. right. that's why it was written that was the same johnny, this but act son, which he seems to be saying. is just as jackson about it though,

i have to be some cases where the government has to come in and make a law against the 1st amendment. hans, i think that he says you cannot falsely cry. fire in a crowded theater. yeah, that issue was debated in my 10 and you can publish the, the, the, the manuscript on how to make an atomic bomb. there are things but not just because the government has an opinion that's different from the other people were taking up way too much of your time. go garland. well, i think what we find out from her speech is who she represents. right? that's what would be because the clearly she's supposed to represent the people. yeah. the court is supposed to mean on behalf of the people not on behalf of the government. she makes it clear that she's saying we've got to make sure that the government isn't hometown strong. as the intent of the 1st of it, in other words, tough luck, government. yes, there will be times when people will say things that are awful and stupid and maybe even wrong. but in our system, the way we created this country that high as the stand. sorry. yeah,

but the right to be so right. but you have a right to be wrong, right. but as well as if she represents the ruling lead, she represents the government. and so she's speaking for the people who put her in power in the bad part of the empire is on the wayne and yeah, hands, that's what the whole trip talk things about. look the by the way, this thing we're talking about here, but i didn't mean interrupt you, but it is the legacy media, social media, same thing, right? you don't see any difference between the 2. she doesn't have a point that we got to keep an eye on social media or the but, but it's social media. this really bringing us to this point, which is the hands wikileaks, the, the, the atrocities being committed by the government. in the fallacy they are being exposed, and now the supreme court is turning to defend the empire as a, as opposed to defending the p. i liked the way you put those 2 together. if i take a vacation where you sit here and do this for me to the manufacture another,

one of the things that i like to do on this show, especially given i have plenty of experience in this area, is to put the us media in place reminding them from time to time. just heather failing us really. but if you think i get relentless with this topic, wait to hear, there's 2 name jose vega. this guy is running for congress in new york. his name is jose vega and when he found out that the distinguished executive directors and editors of the new york times in the l a times and, and the washington post were going to be given a, a conference there about journalism and how they cover story. this guy shows up and he just throws, he loves them, have it here, watch. is there anything you've gotten right in the last 20 years or am i mistaken about that? i mean, it's just kind of funny because i read wrong serious, wrong, russell game really wrong. okay. come in, the list goes on and on. so the last thing you could do to try and actually fix your reputation is acknowledged that through we,

we had to wind out that so lensky was going to bob moscow on the anniversary. i mean, if you saw him parcel students, you at least say, right, that's a wednesday. we're going to bring us on the verge of world war 3. the main screen presence now the dying. nobody is ever going to listen to you again. you have no credibility. the only people tell what you have to release for not being productive to the more edit site. so where are you at least some thing either about north stream or ukraine or the fact that the landscape brought us to the verge of world war 3. and the only reason we knew about that was that leaks, i gotta tell you, i've never seen anything quite like it out. and by the way, when he asked him to respond, they didn't, they ignore them. garland pick it up. well, you know, one of the things that he says is that it's dying will know that the mainstream media is dying on the vine. and we've seen lately, massive layoffs all over the mainstream media. the bottom line is this,

people are transferring their attention to alternative media to shows how does this to youtube shows, etc, because they don't get the truth from that. but people want, even if they don't, and we've had 4, correct, right? absolutely. always things you mentioned were true. i noticed an alternative media people will listen to shows where they don't even ideologically agree with or align with the host. but at least they feel that the person's trying to be honest with them. yeah. they're had trying to have a conversation. you agree? i agree, a 100 percent and main stream made a huge mistake when they turn their news rooms into profit centers. yeah. and when they turn their news programs away from true journalism to live style in entertainment, and they're not providing substance. and the minimal substance that they provide has no context. so, you know, we still some people who are still think that china said a spybot loan over to this country when it was in fact

a wayward weather balloon district, a china, something happened this week as well. but i thought it was interesting. one we found out that us has troops now on an island that's just 3 miles from the coast of china. apparently there to protect and train the taiwan military. also in cuba, the us at teams. and there is one media account of the president of cuba, where he's saying you guys have been interfering with our country now for the past 60 years. here is the president of cuba diaz canal. you see on the, on the yes, he says, well, bottom line is the only reason we got this situation in cuba is because you've had to is that a bar go on has never 60 years. i never thought i would put china and cuba in the same sentence with taiwan in the middle, but that seemed to be the story this week. us interference us interference, us interference, right? and add, make an album. you can add them as well. you can add per room,

you can add bread zoo uh the, the, the ed, haiti, you, you gotta put haiti. and this, uh, because again, the, the folks that have been victimized by american imperialism have now been throwing out the meal liberal american public governments that were in place. and they've been installing their own socialist leaning governments in the united states. under no circumstances is going to tolerate that shift in the global dynamic. well, i don't, i don't know. china is going to tolerate us soldiers as we learned this week in off the 3 miles off of their cost. that's, i mean, i have to ask, are we trying to start with the 3? yeah, well, you know, i think that we have an on, he is the group of the neo cons in the, by the administration. and they're setting fires all over the world. and right now, any time there's a provocative act that they can take against china, they're doing it. i personally think that the bottom administration sees the prob,

occasions towards china as a way to try to attract, you know, what they're always doing. they're trying to attract conservative votes, which they will attract and they're taking just unreasonable chances. but i will say this, i do believe that the leaders in the global majority, the leader of china, the leaders of russia, are wise enough to usher in a new multiple the world. yeah. and keep the hot heads at bay in washington the they're smart enough to do. the global south is certainly a gate in strength and momentum. and i think that's going to create a little bit of a power balance. and they might, that may not be such a bad thing by the way, the service is, is basically doing it to itself because the actions it's taking are forcing these countries to scan relationships. yeah. they otherwise might not have a stab. that's actually a very good point, dr. wilmer leon calling next. and my thanks to both of you for being with us. and that's the end of this once again. before we go, i want to remind you of our mission is simple. as you can probably tell. we try not to live in boxes around here, not just in

a place where people all agree with me. truths don't live in boxes, you know, the way the truth is everywhere. i'm right, your interest i'll be looking for you again right here, where i hope to provide a direct impact the the the

the 2 of the full sauce bags and the crocuses each time the computer, the and i'm of course, all of the men will remain in custody rawland investigation is underway. hundreds of a little sizes and 5 of so it's fast enough to gather a cluster washer. it's on the issue of loss. the live will side, the has no video. the need for the services. we have the high rolling tales of those and so by the my my friend pushed me to the floor and we crawled in the other direction. and that's when they started.