of the so was this the pressure reveals of the moscow terror attackers received money from ukraine while the russian foreign minister of questions the western attempt to whitewash. yeah. because of the, of the nation. one that is on the west is actively trying to convince everyone that this is the work of these law mistake, and that's no one else should be a suspect. and above all, you crank the speak directly and regularly about this country and it's not involved . it is becoming obsessive. the cranes foreign minister appears empty handed after the 1st day of his ongoing visit to india. as you have desperately tried to drum up support from a defiance new delhi plus washington scrambles to coverage elevators. back after the u. n. a special robber tour on palestine accuses israel of committing genocide

in gaza. i find that there are reasonable grounds to believe that that threshold indicating the commission of the crime of genocide against palestinians as a grouping guys as being met. i can help with no history of and i submitted comments that she has made the you're watching r t international. i'm rachel ruble live in moscow. recovering the top new stories from around the world's russia is digging deeper into kids alleged involvement. and last friday's moscow terror attack, the investigative committee says the assailants received money from ukranian nationalists. investigators have been gathering evidence that the apartments of one of the terrorists, the attackers are said to have received large payments in both cash and accept the currency from ukraine. their benefactors have not yet been named a bit of a much a notice of the slid, the when you the initial results of the investigation. fully can some of the plans

made sure of the tire sections, capital preparation, and financial support from the organizers of the crime. the investigation has confirm dates on the income of significant amounts of money and cryptic conferences from ukraine to the perpetrators of the terrorist attack, which we used in the preparation of the crime. and now the suspect involved in that service, the financing scheme has been identified and detained. the investigation will request that the court take a preventative measure against him in the form of reminding custody of the basic forces coming off. the fact we've had claims previously from the head of the russian f s b that ukraine has links to these attacks bonuses you and that was the way, what did you cry supposedly need to do to prove its worth? commit sabotage and terrorist attacks. that's what the ukraine security services and the british security services have claimed. oddly enough, the americans have also spoken about this repeatedly on those. why don't you

specify the yes, the u. k. and ukraine? those 3 countries were behind the terrorist attack. the 2nd question, while i think so, we are currently talking about the findings that we have and there awesome general developments. this is a jigsaw puzzle and adds to that puzzle. we already know that those attack is apprehended as they were fleeing most go through app friend of diamond, brown screeching, which is close to you quite. and that is evidence coming out from the speed that they were looking to head into crane, but they have contacts that and they were hoping for window to be open so that they could cross the border. but also say this is dick. so the latest piece of puzzle we've had today is from the russian investigative committee saying that there was substantial evidence that the currency was funded from ukraine to the attack is on the face and use that for me to fax her attack in most cases, to try to can i just touch him on washington in all this is keeps insisting key of authorities had no involvement, no awareness of this attack. what's being said,

and how does this information relate to that? not? yeah, that's why it wasn't very long off though we were seeing what was happening occurred the city whole that we had a statement from why time saying ukraine was not involved in this attack. there really quick off the law in denying that also say that not involved and we've heard that line over and over, not just from washington, but from other question. so for me, so this is the last 7 days. it's clear that these claims are categorically false. ukraine wasn't behind these attacks. the u. k. was behind these attacks the united states was and by these tests, in fact, the united states warned russia about the possibility of these attacks. so let's just pick up on this morning for a 2nd. this morning's came at the beginning of march. it was basically the embassy website, the us telling the citizens to leave the u. k. website said something very similar, and they have said the americans that they pass all this information to the cbs and

fest me said, well, actually what you gave us was a very known concrete. happened to say it was quite general knowledge, essentially wishy washy. nothing we knew that they took acetone as a result of that. now we've also had a response from the russian foreign minister, maria. so how did as to what seemed villa and to what the us has continues to say in terms of that idea. they saying you claim this know involves the missed as opposed to put them in the white house. along with the state department has stated that ukraine has nothing to do with the tara attack on what data and what information did they draw such a conclusion? it's completely unclear, shouldn't be bringing any one thing is obvious, that washington started to whitewash the key of regime to whitewash themselves because everyone understands that there is no standalone kid for a shame without weston minute. 3 support and western funding that's don't forget, this is an incredibly complex investigation and investigation. the russian

authorities are conducting here on the grounds that the ones with the evidence that the ones piecing this possible together. and i think it's easy to forget sometimes of west and governments can make all the assertions that they want to put a note here. they know 15 through the material and working out exactly what's going on. i'm not exactly what we know. russian authorities weren't serious because they don't know that they holding the warrant, people accountable for this horrific attack dead police attack. and he is a police in russia. the russian foreign minister says washington's constant insistence that camp was not involved in the moscow terror attack is somewhat suspicious. example, the accumulation moment is on the west is actively trying to convince everyone that this is the work of these limits states and that's no one else should be a suspect above all your crank. oh, this speak directly and regularly about this country and it's not involvement. it is becoming obsessive. we have repeatedly said that we're not making any final

conclusions until the investigation is fully completed. we simply have no ride through a lot obviously. especially since those people who carried out this terrorist attack tried to flee to crane before the work detained. the west, especially active in persuading us, not only publicly, but also in context or diplomatic commissions that we should not suspect to crate to the american self trust in every possible way that they warned us on march 7th of this year. following them on march age, the british embassy issued this thing and warrant on the on. so the interest is warnings to their citizens horton. moscow advising them not to attend, must be advanced. as for contacts within the intelligence services, they're generally not publicized, but in a recent interview with the director of the federal security service impressions for board. think of a set that there had been such contacts and there has been a warning, but it was over a very general nature to former us intelligence officer and whistle blower. john to reaku says moscow has an undeniable ride to uncover cabs alleged involvement in the terror attack. we should go where the evidence points and the evidence is pointing

to creep. now, does the evidence say there was official involvement at the premium government? not yet, but it's worthy of investigation there. there's a reason why these attackers were not suicide bombers, which has been the norm in the past. there's a reason why they were fleeing in the direction of ukraine. and i think that, that the russian government has every right in the world to investigate these questions. and to get to the bottom of this, i wouldn't, i wouldn't close the door on anything. if the information was d classified to the point where the us government felt comfortable turning it over to the russian government, then why not release it to the public so that we can make our own decision? why not say this is what we gave the russian government so we can see if the state department is lying,

that the information they turned over was indeed actionable. i would bet my next paycheck that it was not actionable. the cranes foreign minister apparently has nothing to show for it. following a day of talks in india, but he will be going out again for round to a new dell, a. throughout this friday, the me 3 to leave a arrived after the indian leader and held separate phone calls with both is russian and do print in counter parts. intel a has been urging cab to sit down for peace talks with moscow, which you create in officials have so far rejected until a buzz charm offensive follows some critical comments. he recently made about india's stance on the complex on every barrel of russian crude oil delivered to india has a good portion of ukrainian blood in your benefit because of both. i'll stop for me . it won't be good to see more of your help address to us. it's not enough just to point fingers, the repeating union and say, oh, then they're doing the same thing. what's wrong with india, china, and so forth?

the problem is that they are not analyzing the consequences of their steps. these countries have weak intellectual potential. unfortunately, we also some locals in new delhi, what they think about the ukranian and foreign ministers visit, and his previous criticism of their country stats. i think good and get you to and there is a very close and i especially so initially much more, more focus on this. you then new ways you have to delete those lawyer intellectually people today? no, i don't think so. why should the india pay attention to such people who have this kind of stand? i thing in the as that the, the things to take care of. all right, let's get more on this. now. i'm joined by the indian from the indian capital by veterans diplomat and former ambassador. i told him a whole truck and bassett, or considering your experience in this field. what's your assessment of the training on foreign ministers, diplomatic offensive, so far as well?

i think the job in the past uh, they'll create insight and they'll be putting into pro max so they take a video offensive stern. they look quite political, up and down. going to the extent of bleeding and living in the contributing to the one machine to be of a shot. but if you look at the state prince of the craving phone number, so it has been making now in your libby, it looks like they have come to understand that endeavors. going to do something to see that it's relationships with the time tested trend, namely the shop. and they also come to realize that didn't get to speak about principles done, which is the plane guy. and that is a national security. interesting, that's the security interests up, and i'm all i the fully for now is decided to buy oil from a shot, dysfunctional, concise boot sizes. it doesn't mean so if somebody doesn't have this account,

i think i'd also be so so much so that the lady in front of the list that has also now come down to a good thing. it didn't public an interview with times have been guy who said that they have a claim. now i have no problem with them. they're buying the oil from dry shot and they're more them lines or beans that nobody should contribute to, to the ball measuring any of the show. so that i think so great and has come to realize that it has the cannot very buttons for the phones time as part of the conflict because our shuttle claim dispenser. and uh, want to uh, i'm the, the, the okay is western allies. i'm already tried and made uh at 1st to dissuade up us . we didn't have to. uh, you know, criticized, be critical up, but i shouldn't presentation. i think the stand against that are shop. but that's all how fucking all this was it. i think the one of the focus of videos of the,

of the dual canadian phone with us that is likely to be the so far the so far from the beach as uminski is a nose. and which of the natives who's trying to must have support for? well, i really don't know how it does going to be actively because up in the near future . oh, great. doesn't visualize any involvement of parking space or the shop in this piece far away. what to do for them to, you know, be the fault for the formula they want to develop. and if one of the big, one of the 2 conflicting sites is not a part of the, uh, this, uh, this kind of, i guess this semester, i don't know where is it going to end up, but i will call it the non stop the. okay, i the, if you look at the 10 points follow along, it says the mid square foot board, i think it's very maximally stand up. it's very, very unlikely that such as going to agree on actually some pull up the key issues

which is talking about the complete withdrawal. all are talking about the, you know, the community and all those kind of stuff and the other. and i love it. if i could just a jump in real quick, i know the india has a long history of warm relations with russia plus trade between the 2 countries has been booming recently given all of that. what about yeah, what can i actually offer to new delhi? the cube worked in cuba also to nearly me. exactly. is that, is that the question? no, uh, usually be re, re, re, re read what time it started. question off up at this point of time in the front dates in which we had uh, the beeping and talking uh it started question. i'll give a date. i think it's from the uh we're trying to take and balance position, but they didn't want to come and talk to us and explain the point of view. most will come. the point is to what extent i'll be going to go by will they won't say

out of how skillful if they, if they're the mind is so, i mean, i don't think just bear that mind at this point of time that we think of anything that you know, stand up if they want us to be a part of the, the, you know, the piece piece process on tends to be a propos and the, to letting me, uh, possibly, be, uh, full speed. good. uh that this is an issue on which you never have to take the call, but i really liked to be a part of. well, the only patients individual actually has nothing more. and so i don't think anybody at this point of time is looking at the possibility of the, i mean, do you think uh the good no claim number, sel 05 of this go uh movie has been talking to both the leaders and um, onto my mobile device has seen that uh this has to be resolved through peaceful beans. nicholas visions dialogue uh and uh, in fact uh, bmw us quite uh did you want um the main you to the, the. busy as to which in that we are not living in did,

i'll walk. so having said that, i don't to go could i even have anything up to or 1st through now the already lives expecting anything, some green, far back back to the other. i'd be would love to see the developing global stability, and we would like to see a situation where, you know, be a dire uh, environment. the international environment is new. so for development i, there is a fee flow off create that as a low tech, to the security that's go through to, you know, for particular day but the lives and security. all that which is being costa was up to the expense by i'd be, have a definitely need those the macros so of, oh i the show stages i for was to get, go. i didn't get into the equity, it could go from 0. could i which be what able to do successfully then also the it'll be, i didn't think about all the steps to be taken visual to ensure that the bills

cannot flow off of uh, you know, uh the greens and the beat uh from this bottom of the boat, and so i school, uh it shouldn't be puts a killer deal for them. okay. 4 countries late in the mostly electronic products that all right, so that's all the products here and we don't think of no. okay, and is going to make any, any, any, any assurances which i would say that that's a music to the audio. all right, you know, with our veteran indian diplomat and former investor, i tell them a hold. sure, thank you for your time. thank you for it. is demanding 5000000000 euros from the you. the money has been locked up in a european bank just by previous pledges by brussels to hand over the some of the key of the funds are actually profits from russian assets illegally seized by the you. 2 years ago are to contributor rachel marsden ways in there was a lot of stance there recently among european union leaders over their decision earlier this month to use the profits on brushing assets. and that includes the

state assets that are currently frozen in europe to help you great. find themselves on the back for finding a way to get russia to find both sides of this conflict with ukraine. just one tiny detail though, it might just be kind of a legal and apparently euro clear, which is the brussels based financial holding company that's managing these frozen assets and they're generate revenues. they. so concerns about that risk that the u was decided to let a key 5400000000 euros in profits generated to date, to deal with the 94 lawsuit against it from russia already. which is why when you decided that the profits on these russian assets would ultimately go, the key of it would only be on cash generated starting in february of this year. even though there's profits i've been filling up the coffers and brussels since the onset of the conflict back in 2022. but yeah, it is telling brussels they don't really care about their excuses. and that's really just

a huge problem. the 5000000000 euros and profits from these 2 years is equal to one year of an am esp program. so it's a lot of money. i never heard that 5000000000 euros is a buffer for euro clear. it's too big an amount of money to be a buffer at any possible risk. how does it really give it down about brussels and euro players, trivial sugar daddy problems like maybe it actually can't afford to keep shower and ukraine with cash gifts that they have to resort to stealing other people's money? rushes in this case. but jeff doesn't want to hear europe's excuses for putting their foot down on the fire who's of cash when he a already oh, is billions to their honor or the western sugar daddy, the international monetary fund or the i am asked see specifically 2900000000 dollars this year and $11500000000.00 of the at 7 years plus and bought them another $3300000000.00 in interest between now and 2031. so it has more than enough

problems of its own right now. and would really like to make some for europe as well beyond what they already have. of course, not sure if somebody can, if the nonsense are public finances which makes up the other 50 percent of the expenditure come from the financial assistance of our partners. and it is not our approach to simply expect that we will receive help from our partners for decades. experts say that on the contrary, it will be a very difficult period. and the fact that we are used to receiving help from partners will make it very difficult for us to return to self sufficiency. it will be difficult for us in any case in all matters of economic renewal, without exception that we will be used cheap. diplomat, yoseph, burrell underscored earlier this week that the was now acting in its own interest really widely better late than never. i guess it's not a matter of and you know, don't see the alone. he's not the met the or supporting your grade because we love you, grand young people. it isn't our own interest, at least also in the,

in the interest of the us as a global play. yeah. so one who has to be perceive as reliable, barna a security providers do they allies? that's why we called the us to open and to approve the supplementary budget. so apparently those self serve you interest also now include holding onto a slush fund, the cash in europe that has been sold by the u as kind of a fundraiser for you, craig, perhaps you have something to do with russia straight up going out where all of this is headed to show new reading, and this is another statement in line with the movement towards destruction of the legal foundations of dripping and international law. therapies are well aware of the damage, such as the decision can bring both of their economy and to the reputation as a reliable guarantors of the in while ability of property damage will be negligible . the persons who will be involved in making such decisions, the countries that will decide this,

that will become the object of prosecution for many decades. i think the europeans understands that we will challenge this decision. perhaps this will not be a matter of one year, but if decades will not believe it like that. you asked has been a on the you to basically steal russian assets. yeah. just go rob the bad guys. everything will be fine. so instead of doing that, which is something obviously really overtly done, the seems to think that instead just stealing the prophets while not touching the principal would be a lot more clever. and that it's even more clever to say that it's all being done for ukraine while dumping all the cash into a giant slash fund covers the behinds. is everyone involved in brussels? first and foremost, your players getting 3 percent of profits on these assets or on the revenues generated by them plus a 10 percent safety net to deal with potential future lawsuits against it, which it has until 2027 to spend or else it has to hand that over to the you and

then who knows what will happen to it, but the 5000000000 to date. well that could just be kept free and clear. so it sounds like e was found a way to create a giant virtue signaling, charity of sorts for ukraine with conveniently high administrative fees. and even the beneficiaries, ukrainians in this case are angry with it. sounds like yet another resembling success for the big brain bureaucrats in brussels. we're breaking news now from syria where israel has reported like bomb to the city of a level killing at least 38 people. many of the victims are said to be civilians. however, some reports suggest 5 fighters from the lebanese hezbollah militant group were also killed. the syrian defense ministry says the is rarely strike happened in conjunction with a drone attack on a level of targeting civilians that was carried out by terrorist organizations from the city of it lived. sorry,

and officials have not confirmed how many people have been killed. isabel has not yet commented, it will keep you updated the international court of justice has ordered israel to allow more humanitarian aid into gaza to prevent a mass famine. the quote observes the palestinians in gaza and no longer facing only a risk assignment, but the firm and assessing in the state of israel shall ensure with immediate effect, that its military does not commit acts which constitute a violation of any of the rights of the palestinians. in gaza, a nearly 6 months of war has displaced almost the entire population of does. most of them are now sheltering in the southern most city of rasa, on the border with egypt, which is refusing to take in refugees left. despite the fact that the idea of preparing to launch a full scale assault on rafa is local journalists, criminal satari with more distortion on the ground under 5 is more than just that.

that's perfect. the more than 1500000 kind of thing is i should drop off and would you walk down the street to see how all the crowd is to see so all of us know what people that are overflowing good things that have hundreds of thousands of families who are seeking safety and shouldn't there, and they have been lacking any kind of a humanitarian aid. the frontier that is entered is minimum and it's not me think they are, they took the minds of that community and it's not me. think the basic, the facts of the community for food or water or supplies whatsoever, or that her has never been accountable for the context was committed to the study since 1947 up to this particular date of fitness adoption. that is a would be comfortable and dimensions community fade. so what is the account of and so the ground that they were committed? how, what are the kind of thing is understand and out of hopefully, but something different and positive would be happening in defense that south

africa island, some money other countries including profit, are willing to see is that him comfortable? so they see and that i liked and the time it and they believed and hope that this would bring about some change or or later this week, a report on israel is alleged acts of genocide and gaza was submitted to the you and human rights council by francesca albany easy, the one special rapid tour on the occupied palestinian territories. she said she received death threats while compiling the document. the report itself contains detailed descriptions of how godson's are suffering from the as rarely military assault. it describes the blockading of aid that the detaining of civilians and the excessive use of explosives to destroy residential buildings. here's what else francesca opens. the said. i find that there are reasonable grounds to believe that that threshold indicating the commission of the crime of genocide against palestinians as a grouping. guys as being met specifically is right. let's go meet the 3 acts of

joe's side with the requisite intent, causing seriously serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group. deliberately inflicting under group conditions of life calculated to, to bring about its physical destruction the whole or impart and imposing measure as intended to prevent the birth within the group. to however, the us state department has promptly dismissed that report. labeling any genocide allegations as quotes unfounded. let me ask you what have you and did you see or read the report that made by francesca at albany yesterday in geneva, where she cited where she actually, what she showed was refutable as far as she's concerned. refutable evidence that a really engaged in genocide did you see the reports that what does your comment? i did send a report. let me say a couple things about it. first, we have longs for longstanding i, for a long standing period of time to pose the mandate of this special wrapper tour, which we believe is not productive. and when it comes to the individual who holds

that position, i can't help but note um history that i submitted comments that she has made and comments she made in december that appeared to a justify the attacks of october 7th. so i think it's important to take that into account, but with respect to the report itself, we have made clear that we believe that allegations of genocide are unfounded. but at the same time we have are deeply concerned by this number of civilian casualties in gaza. and that's why we have a press the, the government of israel on multiple occasions do everything it can to minimize those civilian casualties. earlier. my colleague nicky aaron spoke with palestinians our last night our account. he says the us is indirectly involved in the war and gods, and that's why it denies any genocide allegations against israel a day night series of america would probably have to see evidence of maybe

a not many announced in his di as a result was ready to attack before he even come close to calling it a genocide. i mean i may be exaggerating a little bit, but really that, that was the matter is that then i'd say it is the predictor of israel no matter what it does. and the, when it says the what then to age, well, august weaponry, everybody that was fired, it would probably send over the house. the deal was going by by american weather, in every building destroyed, destroyed by americans and munitions. everything that was done onto the palestinian is basically a done on written off by. and then i'd say to america, just for this, for both all along. i mean for the past 75 years. and i states has been the power of this way and that unfortunately, the world just looks on it either useless or helpless or unable or disinterested. i mean, you know, we see major power the are unable to change the situation,

especially now one to the house and his face bab and stuff on the interesting that was he's by the us state department space pass. and he said that, uh, washington as opposed to monday, typically, russell. so because he believes it to be not productively, most, not productive about finding out what happened. so there's always a nice, a cover. i mean it, see it is silly, you know, and they say this is not productive. we'll go with the position. i mean, that's what they said. we oppose. and basically they'll probably the position of the robert tar one wonder why, because this is really an investigatory body. it observes, what does that mean? you have on the one hand, and i'd say financing and be possible and deal under the sun. so they can do and observe and all that stuff. but when it comes to a major body like that, in addition that is really and conducting was very incredible. of people like functions, galban it or any of our predecessors don't to do all these violations. that is we have the day and, and it says we, we have no use for it. so it is being.