see, receive the spectrum of low skilled labor people who is fine to, to the building of all aspects of the front of me from the so called low from the vehicle as well from the flu majority to the impurities heartlands. and they do it for money because money, of course, in, in the current world and the current economic order, you know, and decides all things. india is among the countries taking to shake off the legacy of colonialism. we delve into the details with we're now in docs to an host of let's talk about it. i knew panica on the international his guess today is a site visit my mission day. who's being code buddy woods? most preferred lawyer. he's a sneak peak of best sit down eric in full throughout this monday. we made it to the independence or the british jurisprudence and the british system. because there were low country for hundreds of us. and you didn't been in the court then able to insect. and the camp was there's a court, particularly for that i was framed in $1816.00 so that the law continued in our

country did about now the government of india has realized that most of those laws, red object laws, number one. now what do they are meant to protect the british crown and the fines and the punishment imposed did not match the present system in the work. so the government, i mean, that is done about it is particularly optimism that ended when they came in to the united cabinet in the country. she had promised us that every day you wouldn't delete one law. that would be the same by the addition, you're happy with the time happy. i'm happy with jane because uh we are going away from the code on the, on the in friends that the indian system had the language that has been using the court yesterday as being on the sort. but i'm okay published and i don't know the language was english in all the courts right now,

if you're not here to get judgements and we're not the if you go to the level, the court proceedings take this environment. and so i've gone one man who is the biggest bigots to know what is happening in this case and or not. is it right? thanks for joining us. this monday. coming away next middle of town with the latest episode of modus operandi and all. but that was more needed to talk with them. bye for now. the hello, i'm the miller chan. you're tuned into modus operandi. as the ukraine conflict enters it's 3rd year with no off ramp in sight, many in the west are noticing mixed signals from their respective governments about how this regional war may soon impact them at home. from doomsday prepping to

patriarch calls to join the military will explore some of the not so subtle messages coming from europe. all right, let's get into the m o. the vw, waco has issued a disturbing, a warning to countries in europe. start stop piling medicines for new clear emergencies. that message rang in 2023. and now by 2024. the message is about stock piling. every thing you can at home, basic medicines, medical supplies, shelf stable food, water, batteries, even candles. and when you read stories about celebrities, an ellipse like mark sucker berg, allegedly building some sort of dues day, or nuclear fall out bunker in hawaii. you really start to wonder if perhaps they

know something we don't. is there a cause for concern that expansion of the ukraine war is possible and just who would drive that expansion for more on this will bring in a geo political expert, glen deason, professor of political science and history at the university of oslo in norway, his newest book is out now called the ukraine war and the your ration world order professor. thank you so much for joining us. well, thank you for having me on to. so i am seeing a lot of tv commercials magazine inserts billboard, social media posts, articles you from all over places across europe, basically telling people to stock up on medicine because of forthcoming shortages, you know, just in case just in case socket. bunch of staple food stuck up on water, be prepared. they say in case of what professor, i mean for me when i hear this,

i think of toilet paper, because you know the great tp shortage of 2020. that was due to coven. but i don't get the sense that they're implying another pandemic will befall europe. what are they really saying here? well, listen to contradictory message, because on the one hand we hear from many officials that there's no direct threats from russia. russia wouldn't dare to attack nato on the other hand, and we're also being told we have to prepare for war and the rush i could attack, but this is part of the, you know, conflicting messages we, we get all the time and the, but i guess this hyperlink, the fair, a warehouse some purposes for one, it creates more incentives or willingness to invest more into the ukranian war. and the assumption being that they said we can fight rush over there, then we don't have to fight them here. but it could also be

a warning for possible future need to enrollment. again, this would be speculation, but obviously the worse and going us we have planned and us is to create an army, begins to collapse. nature will have a dilemma. the time is it's going to the once you create collapse and accept that this proxy or has been a failure in the fields or will in a real nato, then escalate to by sending more long range missiles, weapons, or sending actual more nato troops into ukraine. either officially or under the framing flags, and both of which could then spark of the rest of the war between nato and russia. so it's, it's so far it's unclear. and if it's just to increase the support for the transport or planning for the situation to get to more moving more towards the direct force. so, but again, it's sort of strange august. no one's thinking about russia will invade the no one

us clear the set exactly. what would be the point of this or the strategy? now, here in the states, we constantly hear mainstream media saying, put in, we'll just march into the you after the fall of ukraine. you know, despite his constant rejection and, and denial of this notion. and despite 0 evidence to support this claim that are being made by politicians here in the us and in europe, americans are split on whether or not to believe this. what about your opinions? are they believing this allegation? well, i think they're also a bit split. part of it is because the narrative is not the consistent because so it keeps saying that it's important to get to your credit into nato, because the russia would never dare to attach the ukraine if it was part of nato. on the other hand, we're also told one, so the rush was done with ukraine is going to march into nato. so none of this

really makes any sense of the content of both ways. you know, if we have a proper journalist with integrity, they would ask this question, which one is it there? but unfortunately, and no one's really putting forth a clear narrative, the main common denominator would be that we're being told, you know, we should say russia. but still we are more powerful, so it ends up not being consistent. and this is something that we see with actually over at least over the past 200 years, whenever there's a reference to, to rush out depends take one out of to use either. it's hopelessly backwards or it's an overwhelming threats to civilization. and we'll see this in ukraine as well. you know, the russians are stealing the toilets and washing machines. this is to harvest them for computer chips. but at the same time, they're developing a doomsday device in space. you know, they can't take a single village with

a new crane, but still they will uh, roll over over your unless something is done. so it's, um, i think it's the that the divisions and the countries can be considered a product of this very inconsistent narrative. so, but again, this is the, the narrative we have, the people are confused because of the says, rushing, they did you claim that this invasion was provoked while it was on, provoke the russia simply looking for a new territory to him. if that's the case, it's an a form of opportunism. so it's there unpredictable where it will go next. but of course if you meant to draw some privilege, then you have to address other questions. to what extent did we provide help to promote kits, and then you would actually have to deal with the idea about this of a peaceful settlement to this, which we're not quite ready to do yet. so we're still sticking with unprovoked narrative, which i guess feels a lot of this confusion. yeah, let's also not forget young adult and birth public. we said the reason for the

russian invasion was the expansion of nato into ukraine. a look at it. can i add one thing on this? cuz you said, yeah, no, sorry about, but this is part of the inconsistent narrative. because for years the nato secretary general of the in stoughton works that listen and nato expansion has nothing to do with this more. this is just rush, i want to restore the soviet union. and then when it's on a different topic is talking about expanding nato to, to sweden and finland. now, you know, he takes us victory lap and so, so listen, the russians told us the condition if, unless we accept their child to, for ukraine, they would invade because this was the main concern for the russians. no more nato expansion or will and named you prince. and he says, well of course we said no. and russian baited. and now i'm at the same time any saying, listen, we a, the russians wanted less nato on their border. now they're getting more. so this

was kind of the victory lot, but now it's been think 2 things. this has nothing to do with nato, and this is the reason why russian related. so again, these 2 things can both be true. so ideally you, this is when a journalist would come up to say, well, which one is it like a stupid thing to contradictory things about the she hasn't been asked that question yet. so this fear monitoring over russia, the constant comparison between put in and hitler or russia and the nazis. obviously, world war 2 strikes a different nerve in europeans and it does for americans because, you know, unlike the us, europe really was getting taken over by the nazis. but it was the russians. and the soviets, who staved off the nazis, it was the soviets, who planted their flag on the right stuff. well, most americans may not actually know this fact of history. europeans should know

when you are a university professor, have the younger europeans forgotten about their own modern history as well is it also strikes a different nerve for europeans because this will be the ground 0 or this was the center of the 2nd world war. and the, it would likely be the center of another world war if we would fights one against russia. but also we should have a better memory of history given that this was a more on our soil, lots of united states. and this actually interesting polls which have been done in france since then, the world war 2. and they asked the, the of this, the respondents of a who contributed the most of the seat of fiddler. now after world war 2, you have a almost 60 percent confirming. well obviously the source of the so it's uh and then you see a decade by decade is dropping. and i think now we're down to 14 percent recognizing us with the soviet union,

which is kind of quite astonishing because yes, you can have different interpretation of reality. but there's also an objective reality. you can actually measure was clear, observable, immeasurable indicators who contributed the most. and it's interesting that over time and yeah, it's simply a vanished reality objective reality. we don't give it a few more decades and they probably think here sometimes saved here from the fascist about the parts of the simpler references. so this is not nothing new, of course, at least over the past 30 years. and every new war and the leader of the serial country is a new retardation of hitler. so in the last of which was the hitler, that sort of the singles that hibler, that officer hibler put in. and some are also referred to. she has a lawyer. and this has um, but it's a silly way of referring to, well simplifying the complexity of international relations and conflict. i mean,

if you would explain this how you would explain politics to a child or a fanatics, which is so like, we're having a conflict because the other country has a very bad man ruling it. if we can just get rid of the men, we will go back to normal, see in depriving or an issue of holes. it's complexity and dominant down. simplifying it to that extent, it's a dangerous and also put it in the category of propaganda. um, but again, this is often where we end up, it's a narratives a, again, this corporate counter, you want to re do service thing to narrative good versus evil democracy, russo authoritarianism. and uh, if i say it's dangerous as well. well, because the benefit obviously is good to mobilize the public if they think they are in the conflicts with people, the dangerous, if you come into the people that we're on, the struggle of good versus evil, then you are willing to reject a workable piece because now it gets evil piece would require victory, and the guess evil negotiations is a piece not. this also helps evasion more than

a century ago by walter ligman during the russian revolution, when they looked at the british propaganda. but you could us easily applied today to the were a new cream to wear. more weapons is now the cost of peace negotiations and diplomacy is an evil which we should not even discuss. right. coming up next, the fall of 2024 may prove to be one of the most consequential seasons in modern times as americans go to the polls to elect potentially a different president. but also, there will be shake ups in the european parliament elections and a new face will lead nato. we'll discuss it when we return with professor. when these and sit tight, the m o will be right back. the oh,

[000:00:00;00] the the russian states never is as tight as i'm sort of the most sense community best. not getting hold of all sense and the in the system must be the one else holes. question about this, even though we will fan in the european union the kremlin mission, the state on the russians cruising and split the ortiz full neck, keeping our video agency roughly all the band on youtube tv services. for what question did you say a request,

which is the type of rick sanchez and i'm here to plan with you. whatever you do, do not watch my new show seriously. why watch something that's so different little opinions that he won't get anywhere else. welcome to please or do have the state department c i a weapons, bankers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your fax for you. go ahead. change and whatever you do. don't want marshall state main street because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called stretching, but again, you probably don't wanna watch it because it might just change the waiting thing.

the welcome back to the m. o i manila chan. let's waste no time and hop right back in with our guest, professor glenn, these and thank you so much for sticking back with us. now speaking of nato, joe biden has reportedly endorsed the dutch p. m. mark ruetta as the next nato secretary general. now young stilton burke's term is coming to an end this fall in october, head of the us presidential election is rude at has the backing of the u. s. is this basically a done deal? and, and what does that mean for the expansion of the ukraine war? well, i think once by now, which is, was a report of political us, of given the support for that was to i would consider that to be uh, yeah, this is the only thing we need to know. uh, i don't think they are being switched to go against a biden's selection. of course,

there will be this argument that the everyone has to be consensus. everyone has to agree to. but as we saw with the even, you know, nato expansion to sweeten the countries like turkey or i'm hungry, who don't fall in line, the immense pressure come on them. so i don't see anything genuine seriously, will oppose this. um, but the it will, it wouldn't surprise me. it didn't surprise me actually, who wrote on twitter more than a month ago is for predicting that's exactly the would become the next. like next middle 6 that are general. now i don't have a crystal both. i was merely reading deduction, media, and introduction media. they, they covered the future for uh, for the day, you know, have to have to agree to step down as a prime minister middle months, given some very scandals. and then the dr. media reports how he was trying to get a new job for himself that he was targeting this new to a tough job in order to get it. he, i've made sure to is what's the best from you know, said

a sweep all criticism under the carpet. so effectively, whitewash is relative on the side is also taken on a fiercely anti russian auster. and of course, joining in on the bombing of u. m. a. so this was kind of winning the approval and showing his loyalty to washington. and then washington will select him to lead the other europeans. so this also really, i think was quite predictable. and that being said, i think it's 2 thirds of the europeans as well support his candidacy. so i think it's now automobile. i've heard some chatter of compulsory military service for you states being discussed that with the fact to mean more soldiers for nato. meanwhile, french president emanuel my crone, has thrown around the idea of this sort of independent, you only military force or this alliance. what compulsory military service be

supported by most european civilians or, you know, this idea of in you only military alliance. well, in terms of the compulsory military service, it's becoming concerned because that's the europe is now to look into the prospect . the war is looking now more and more likely. i mean, initially was the training, so we're supposed to fight, but the now that we're running on the train is that it becomes a possibility that we might, that this one might be expanded. so the worst johnson here, he made a fleet to the, to the british, where he effected them to come to argue that they have become, as well too fast and lazy to this interested in the army. so there is, of course, now to how to re mobilize syrup and to this. and i think it could be possible for some to the police of warm up the public to the idea of a compulsory military service. as most of most of the country sound good. um got

rid of it. uh this i babe i am unable to make it on to develop an independent you military force. it's been, uh, it's been the for a while. and the reason why he, they propose that this just many reasons one would be, it's a, it's a reason for further integration. and this is a problem because you can't really deliver and much economic benefits anymore. so what's going to drive forward further? integration? it's hard to make an economic arguments for it now. so shifting to the military scenario would make more sense. i think also this in the side of i'm from any opinions to be able to search some kind of independence. and keep in mind that you for years talked about strategic autonomy here, keen independence. but as we see now that the europeans have become a cut themselves off from russia increasingly to china becoming very dependent on united states. ringback which is causing a lot of concern. so and the key instruments for the united states is converge

security dependence into economic loyalty. so we have military conflicts with other countries. we will more likely be able to well, the reduce our, the verification and become more reliance on the united states. so they have some purpose to be able to you army. but the, i, it's, um, it doesn't have the likely, it's unlikely to succeed, i think. and it would also contribute to the current trend of making, the less the civilian force and more towards the so called geo political or militarize the structure. now lastly, on the title of your new book, the ukraine war and the your region world order. explain that title to us and perhaps your outlook for the conflict in, in the months to come. well, um i argue that the, the, the ukraine warner percent something much larger than man there proxy or in your,

uh, because uh, and you hear this rhetoric coming from both sides. both the, well, the ones on the west and congress and russia. talk about this as if it would be a shaping that i will order and i think the do this cause is correct. we're currently part of the chaos we're in most conflicts uh today or to a large extent of products um are shifting world order after the cold war. we had a world order based on unit velocity. that means one central tower, which was due, not a states, and this is so the world was going to be organized through us global privacy unit, florida is no longer a reality is reality in terms of the power distribution. you see now multiple r t. how so what it emerged and is manifesting itself. but we're in the middle between 2 orders. we haven't, we have less beautiful r t, but multiple r t, it hasn't really cemented itself. and for this reason, the us would like to pull the world back. beautiful archie. well, you know, russia, china, india, most of the world would seek for most of the world outside middle that is,

would like to see the world pushed towards multiply fee. and i think this is a good way of understanding the ukraine in worse worldwide. both sides are prepared now to risk even nuclear war, as if the, if needed when this war and russia would be broken. and also that's what we can significantly china, and this will be the what will the strength and the, the unit fall or order. on the other hand, if the russia would succeed, then we would likely see multiple are to emerge. and this is also the, the message i get from people around the world. the various leaders around the world are saying in a way that we don't necessarily support rushes for against the ukraine. but the, if we, if for nato defeats rush out of the world will really be unbearable. eh, at least the width would be unbearable if there were then tried to act as a unit for collective hedge them on again. so,

so this is kind of the world order we're currently in. and of course this also explains a lot of the conflicts with iran and china, etc. now, um, i argue that the new world we're coming towards is not just multiple everybody. so you ration multiple are to so different than what we had in the past. us to describe powers from china, india, russia are seeking to integrate the racial continent in order to lay the foundations for the full set amount of quarter in terms of a so the costs of the months to come. i think this is the yeah, quite the important time for all of humanity in the most to come because the way i see it on the battlefield. nato and ukraine is listening. this just objected reality is a war of attrition. we've lost your friends, lost his manpower this, so no more weaponry that munition even natal admitted the we emptied our storage and the premium appears to be

a friend. the army appears to be on moving towards collapse, which is also fueling political conflict. so this is why we're in the dangerous winter time. now ukraine lights, if it collapses, what is, what are we going to do? or we're going to send in a snare to gonna join the conflict. and we're going to fight russia, which would very likely end up in a nuclear exchange. or we're gonna try to find some kind of a peaceful settlement or just watch your grand collapse. and there's so much there's so much dependence on this. again, the future of the world order, so you should expect countries the great powers to be willing to take huge risks, even though it's difficult to predict the consequences. and again, this is why it's a extremely dangerous war. and the absence of any diplomacy and negotiations is so dangerous, glen, this and professor of political science and history at the university of oslo.

thank you so much as always go check out his new book called the ukraine war and are your ration world order. thank you. oh, thanks again for letting me on to appreciate it. all right, that is going to do it for this episode of modus operandi the show that digs deep into foreign policy and current affairs on your host window a chance. thank you so much for tuning and we'll see you again next time to figure out the m. o. the in 1941 with the nazis health relation, ultra nationalists. the u astonishes the claim, the independent state of croatia. shortly off, the seizing power. they built the scene of us concentration camp a place associated with the worst atrocities committed in yugoslavia during will go

to use dash is used to come system to isolate and exterminate subs, roma, jews, and other non catholic minorities and political opponents of the fascist regime conditions in the scene of us come with a renders the gods tortured to arise and the prisoners they send them your constitution caps. so most of them died. it was incredible genocide,

the the russians federal security service. things that the terrace of specs from sunday's wait in southern russia were directly involved in the quote because to 3 months ago with the one that's missing the full attacks were plots issue. we were planning a terrorist attack here under bank of cas, b, c, d, or in the victory part, the thought of getting a crowd of people i believe the weapons to the guys who attack rocha, city hall, the questions for an intelligence phase and walk sense of is trying to whitewash do pregnant impulse must convince sound lice with dice because behind the most goes cons that whole sure. take a scuffle, erupt in front of an indian. a cold house has