extremely irresponsible steps and statements. the consequences of strikes on nuclear facilities could be extremely severe. uncontrolled escalation could occur, and everyone would be affected. as for a former us senior security official, john bolton's calls to targeting to renew nuclear facilities. he is a famous person at one time he was in the diplomatic service, but he did not become a true diplomat. this is his mentality. he does not rely on diplomacy, but on the use of force. in this case, such statements are precisely an attempt to rely on forceful methods, which i repeat, could lead to complete chaos in the middle east. these are irresponsible and extremely dangerous statements, although, to be honest, i know bolton a bit. i met him personally many years ago, but he is such a person being a diplomat, i probably shouldn't talk about hypothetical scenarios,

but i will refer to and a written in military statement that iran knows where is really military facilities are located and will take appropriate measures if something like this happens, that is almost a threat to respond in a similar way for the region. this could mean a severe radiological disaster and a major war. but it is better even not to discuss such scenarios. let's just hope and pray. they never materialize. and that is where we leave things from the news room here in law school for now. but there's plenty more ahead this our own r t c was showing wherever you are today. in moments goodbye. the,

[000:00:00;00] the in the year of 1954, the united states of america engaged in warfare against the people of vietnam. the white house supported the corrupt above and governments of southern vietnam. in 1965 americans began their invasion following the aim to defeat the forces of vietnamese patriots. the pentagon was confident that the victory would be on the american side, due to its military superiority. however, the vietnamese, during this war into total health for the occupants. unable to cope with the guerrillas, the american army started blanket bombing alongside using chemical weapons and

naples, which burnt all alive. the village of my lay, where he 1969 american soldiers killed 504 civilians, including 210 children, became a tragic symbol of this war. all and all. during the whole period of this conflict, the usa dropped on vietnam more than $6000000.00 tons of bonds, which is due and a half times as much as on germany during the 2nd world war. in 1973, the american army under the pressure of the rebels, withdrew from vietnam, and only 2 years later did the puppet regime. and so i got involved. however, the vietnamese paid a high price for their freedom. more than 1000000 vietnamese people became the victims of american aggressors, the dns of the new jews who was as been choose for many centuries the way that they

made best acute at once a bullshit games rest. and nobody can know, it seems that the police smoking by the same, the the on march, the 22nd 1943 during the great petri, i'll take off the shirts and bunch of cuts out in 118 and down the belly. mercy. and for the age of cutting the ship of some person, if i did the new wish, the loaded into the luxury is scenarios to block pieces to this one, most of the stuff for them to pony it to you. $149.00 people died,

including $75.00 children of age was practically wiped off the face of the law. new blue loves are a little but live arching kind of. charlie was more noisy and we'll use porter. suppose, oh shoot. was hard really. i really usually don't you feeling yes, so the infamous battalion responsible for the atrocity included over $100.00 ukrainian nationalist from west to new brian philadelphia. all right, and so i'm see what you guys as far as the new e phone, that's a lot of those to you guys, but i assume you're up with them. you as customers declassified criminal cases from the central archive of the k g b, a better rules shed light on the atrocity. and on so numerous questions that have remained an onset for many years. watch on oxy a. hi,

i'm rick sanchez. and i'm here to plan with you whatever you do. do not watch my new show. seriously. why watch something that's so different. listed of opinions that he won't get anywhere else. welcome to planes or do you have the state department c i a weapons, bankers, multi $1000000000.00 corporations. choose your fax for you. go ahead. i changed and whatever you do. don't want marshall state main street because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called stretching, but again, you probably don't wanna watch it because it might just change the way you the city. what is your assessment of the following official statement by the federal department of foreign affairs of switzerland, russian for administer, sergey love. ralph was the 1st person with whom swift minister cassius discussed the practical details of

a planned peace conference on ukraine. a genuine peace process can only take place with the participation of both. what are the conditions for such talks to take place? there's just one word of truth in this that we had a meeting. i see. we took part in the new york meeting of the un security council on palestine. i have known him for a long time. he has been rotating in the group of 7 for quite a while and served as the chair actually the elect, a new chair from the members every year. so ignacio castle was at that meeting too and asked for a one on one meeting with me. so we never concealed to the fact that we were having a meeting, 2 pictures of the 2 of us were taken when the delegation is left. and this happens right after the demos world economic forum, where the copenhagen format was held by switzerland on its sidelines as requested by the ukrainians. so he asked me if i saw his media stake out after the meeting. i said i didn't,

and he told me and then he stated to the media that after another ukrainian piece, formerly meeting, they came to the conclusion that there was no points intervening without rush. i didn't know. i said they didn't really need to meet up again to realize that given their experience. and if they didn't realize this, then why do they hold that meeting in dallas? i'm not betraying any secrets here really. and by revealing this information, i've told this to my colleagues on many occasions, even if you don't reveal us in chris, we won't be upset to school. so he said to me that he just wanted to make a smooth entry into the process in order to be able to adjusted from within the they wanted to prepare a to put conference, which is any set. it might not be possible to invite rush on to the 1st part of it, so only to the 2nd part. so i asked him what they were going to do at the 1st part of the conference, which she told me they were going to finalize the sa lensky formula. as it had many things in is that the developing countries were interested in. and i told him, quite frankly, there were 3 things,

units that zalinski and the west to we're after and rushes capitulation and withdrawal to its 1991 borders of the russian leadership and brought to justice will support marshal and reparations. and in between the lines, there was an obligation to be imposed on russia regarding troops that could be deployed within the 200 kilometers border zone. as for energy before the security for nuclear security and cultural cooperation with exchange of po w's search for missing persons that you know, those are just peripheral items put in place around this ultimatum of to win. the hearts of the global majority with these countries are being enticed in the following manner. all right, so you don't want to be enemies with russia. you don't want russian to pay reparations. you don't want to bring it to court. we understand how about you just take the food security issue that just supervisor what security or energy security of these people are all just high class fraudsters. i mean high class in their own

areas of responsibility areas they supervise and their relevant governments, but they are frauds at the core, the schemes they offer, our fraud schemes they're doing so deliberately. it is impossible not to see this and some of our partners, including several bricks countries that attended previous meetings. we know for sure that at every meeting, they emphasize the need for having a conversation with russia. we appreciate the signals sense from their side. but if, as the west ones, the zalesky formula is adjusted and fine tuned, and the west knows how to do that. for instance, by introducing meaningless lay, which is the provisions about a quality security interests. while keeping the essence on changed. that is not the path that we should follow railing to take the chinese position. one that we respect to the formulated their own 12 items will last february. and recently, german chancellor, all our shows paid a visit to chinese president fusion pain. right after that,

schultz announced quite dis, honestly, that shooting pink supports the peace conference in switzerland. we've got a question prepared on that subject, mr. law for all. so don't st. paul it for us yet. well, the point i wanted to get across is that according to china, the thing we need to do 1st is to get an insight into the root causes of the crisis . i mean, the cold war mentality must be dropped one where the party see each other as adversaries were enemies. we need to have a clear cut obligation to look for solutions that were taken to account security aspects and ensure that security is indivisible. this is a very different approach. now, china with going back to the recent statement is by 4 administered one year and other chinese officials, china called for a conference that would be acceptable both to russia and ukraine. this effectively means it isn't the zaleski formula which should be starting with. in fact, his plan should be put aside if like our president said,

they are willing to do that. then we can start discussing the basic foundations for talks upon which everything else will be built. as for switzerland's initiatives, the swiss are not covering our meetings with them properly. in fact, there were just one meetings at the end of january or an early february. we don't remember what exactly, and even if we forget about the ukraine aspect, switzerland is not a good platform for us. it is because they are no longer a neutral party. we should, instead of being a neutral country, they hold an outright adversarial stance as they signed and joined in on every sanction against russia. without exception. some countries, those that are not part of the european union. so wanted to add new ons to their activities on that front. however, switzerland eagerly joined in on every section imposed on the rush of more over several months ago. they have adopted a doctrine where a strategy of national security, which says they should pursue security partnerships, not with russia,

but against russia. so it's rather odd to see them presenting themselves as so hospitable, when all they hope to do is retain their relevance as mediators. because until recently, everyone was fine with a meeting in geneva or in vienna. so that's that. some, you know, some of the 10 for mr. lab rob, we've covered this lensky plan and we're all pretty clear about that. no discussions here as for the used on board agreement, it doesn't work as well because we have been double cross there as well. are there any other options? are there any alternatives? any 3rd option? if we look at the situation on the ground, we can see that russia control some parts of the heart of region, but god only knows what will happen tomorrow. the situation is evolving as we speak . are we fighting until the end, or is there something else we could formulate an agreement of sorts and present that to the world. but it's just sort of the push, the president putin has already put forward his formula after the assembled process was over and after the west winds beyond supplying long range munitions and arms to

crime and also started to help them retrofit their equipments. yes, there are western specialists retrofitting many different types of missiles and ukraine to extend their range. and after these missiles started being used to attack civilian targets. in fact, there was an episode when they use drones past with a lot of explosives and sent them to one of our strategic airfields. when we analyzed the equipment used, we saw that the drone itself was upgraded to extend its range significantly. after that came the crime in bridge attack, then they kept attacking some estoppel hindering navigation in the black sea attacking both warships and commercial vessels. and i'm not even talking about bold garage occurs and all the other terrorist attacks on the russian cities. at some point. and president putin spoke about this one, answering a question as to how we can make our own land safe. he said, we need to move the line from which they can attack us. i believe that hark of

place, an important role here. and what next? where do we move the line next? wells? i mean, if we move it to heart of the previous border will be safe, but then other territories will be under attack. so we still have to move forward. our position is that the special military operation must continue, but we signal clearly that we are ready to negotiate and these are not empty words . however, speaking to the landscape is useless. for many reasons, his master is upset and we quoted one of them earlier. all those words about losing our head gemini, about the geo political failure of the west. in fact, it was, you'll said burrell stated, it would be very difficult for the west to, to accept such a defeat. because their reputation is on the line. i personally don't think it would cost them much in that respect. after the us fled from vietnam after they fled from us again to stand or looking at how they are being driven from

a rock or take syria where they're being pressured from different groups. is there a single case where the us remains involved? unless of course, the goal has been to sell chaos from the very start. but if their real objective was the same as the stated one, then it means they failed. they failed across the board. they, katie, for example, a tiny nation with the americans have been in charge of it for more than 100 years since 1918. now there was rapids crime gangs running the place. and some criminals came to power through the us has been trying to deal with the at establish some agreements. now there was rapids crime, gangs running the place and some criminal came to power. the us has been trying to deal with him and establish some agreements with triple a country rights in the us back yard. they've been focusing a lot on hating, including at the un security council,

but with no success so far. okay. how about they just deal with that 1st rush. it has to deal with ukraine because there is a threat opposed to us for the americans with the threat coming from haiti is at the very least drug trafficking. all these drugs go into the us now. i wanted to you to tell us about shooting things initiated save, but you've already covered that. so i'm going to ask a broad the question, something that many people would also like to know, and we all agreed that it would be all, some a fresher remains in the course of independence from the west. i personally think that we should move towards not being dependent on any one, but any conflicts of all relations with china. what is seen there is a risk now that we've moved away from the west of us to be counting to a reliance on china. maybe we won't, but if we do, would that be a problem or not? after all? well now, best pals with china looks like it. the, the china is

a different civilization entirely and it has different principles at its core. now that doesn't mean they don't want to benefit from their relations with us. they want to develop their economy, their social sphere, their security, just like everyone else. in that aspect. china is still a rather young country. yes, it's civilization is thousands of years old, but there came a point in his history when it suffered greatly under colonialism, colonizers came from all over from european countries from japan. and the chinese remember that very well. it is in their nature to buy their time. never to rush to quote things you'll ping the journey over stuff was in miles starts with a single step. because if we're speaking about china's dominant position in the modern global economy, they've arrived at any very discreet way without people noticing those 20 years ago . the global chinese factory was making products for the west, close to toys, and then step by step over time they came to their present position. so patients is

one of the remarkable qualities of the chinese people that china now has emissions that spanned the entire planet. that is certainly true. choosing pain has presented several initiatives, like the community of common destiny, which says that we all need to work out some common principles. the belton road initiative in economic project with a goal of chinese expansion of any positive sense. the expansion of china is capital and industry there, logistics chains. there is a global security initiative to which has in many ways aligned with our own principals. i visited badging recently and i spoke to the chinese leadership. we discussed the implementation of all these initiatives to clearly if we look at the global context and global security, our primary goal is to ensure security in your ration because the, your atlantic model on which security had been based since the creation of the policy, which was during soviet times, the same model that we relied on after the disintegration of the soviet union. i'm

not going to name all the documents that we signed together to ensure our security . the west didn't want to honor these documents so that your atlantic security model was embodied in nato and the associated with nato. we even had a need to rush or counsel with the model and it's present. innovation has become obsolete, which is why now we want to talk about your age and security, and it is more reasonable because this is all one continents. there are no outside us from across the ocean participating unit. the new model will be based on uniting all the existing projects, like the e, u. c. s t o c i s, and that s c o. china is built and wrote initiative creates an economic foundation for future deals in terms of security. and we intend to keep the door open to the western parts of the continental to everyone. but your agent is our common home, our common temple. so everyone needs to act accordingly. instead of bringing the

wants and desires of the americans into the new model. because they will absolutely try to interfere with them, like they always do, like they're now middling in the asia pacific region in the indian ocean and other regions to us. but china is already a very powerful country machine. however, when china proposes its projects, it does not give out order, so it just says, okay, this is what we can propose, an economic project to build a new railway in central asia or an africa or elsewhere. and the agreement is reached based on the balance of interest. the same is true for our relations with russia. last year we saw a record growth of trade in over $240000000000.00. and it is going to get even bigger. a major part of our investment cooperation is high tech, nuclear energy building, modern aircraft. i know you ask this question because we're seeing a lot of chinese products sold and russian. yeah, i don't see anything wrong with that. i just wanted to know your opinion about that

. i don't see anything wrong with that to take chinese cars because they are competitive products and they will help us elevate our own car industry. little because you kind of grow without competition with in the soviet union. there was no competition. people liked that. yes. i had a huge, equally car, for instance. no good. but we could have had better quality. you've had there been market competition to today when i look at ours, equally factory until the other car. factories like guys, they tried to stay competitive, take the most of each browser, some say, how can you call it a most coverage if half of the parts are made in china? and so what i was trying his own car industry also had to start somewhere work to do this, the president, mr. law for off going back to europe. and how would you explain the over the top hysteria that we're hearing from heads of european states, saying that russia is about to attack them exposed to i could say that this is just paranoia and to be done with it to, but i feel this is more of

a cunning plan for what your opinion leaders badly needs is to squeeze money out of their parliaments in order to keep the war going. the us, as you can see, as lots of some of it z o in that respect, we will see how the drama in the us is going to unfold with respect to the bills on the floor, some of which concern ukraine. but if we look into who is most active, most energetic when it comes to pumping ukraine with weapons. that is certainly the europeans or look at all of shells, believes he's leading the charge for in terms of providing help to crane, where a manual nat cronin the world longer. or the smaller nations like the baltic states for the check republic. so the both the states, yes, the limit truck states. now these are certainly things to consider. first of all, the you personified bubble rails shelves were still of underline. they were so blatantly so transparent, so fixated on cutting off all ties and when they made their statements, saying that russia is an enemy to be crushed,

the crane must be saved. and now if they change anything about their rhetoric, their political careers will end, their own political opposition will make quick work of them. and secondly, the reason they want the money is because they will have to explain to their people . so why there can no longer be any cheaper gas, cheaper oil. why the prices are on the rise. why as a result of the sanctions, their countries are undergoing the industrialization like german factories have to move their production to the us or china. a recent example of the latter was one of shows visited china, accompanied by germany's business leaders. the reason they came was not to agree on some mutually profitable projects, but to negotiate the movements of their manufacturing to china. even if everyone comes down and we freeze the conflicts, you have to understand that these guys are having elections in a few months times. and in many you countries,

there will be national elections. and their opposition is going to use this chance to demonstrate economic and social outcome of europe's policies. in any case, the opposition is not going to miss that opportunity. we won't. but if you're a pain leader is suddenly stop telling tall tales about our so called plans to attack nato. then well, right now, they're hoping to scare the voters and continue with the same policies. but what amazes me is that at the start, when the special military operation 1st began, some people in the us and europe said that, had they accepted ukraine into nato. clinton would not have been bold enough to attack it. and now they say ukraine must not be defeated because if it is put in, is going to immediately strike against nato some logic, right? all the want to do was scare people terrified them into a medians. i don't know how to comment on all that really. there is this commander from norway who's saying europe must prepare for a military confrontation with russia in the arctic. they expect us to attack everywhere. vladimir putin said many times, that there is no sense for us to attack them. if they would like to bring the

needle boarders closer to ours, we will not allowed to do this in ukraine. i don't know what will happen to western ukraine. many politicians express their own ideas about it, but russian, ukraine, that are originally was russians that wants to be part of russia that wants to speak. russians wants to educate children and russian wants to bring flowers to monuments commemorating people who shouldn't blood for this land. when it was russian or soviet, during the great patriotic war, this is not up to discussion. in my opinion, the is

the video of a lead for abuse by an officer. today, a sheriff's deputy in columbia, south carolina, forcibly removed a student from a classroom at spring valley high school. i saw him just talking to her was playing her. and initially, you know, i didn't think is a problem because i knew that she was just, is quite a student in the class. someone looked at the police officer and says, here as law enforcement, that is worse. clearly attack game abusing power and it ended there are others besides, this is what's wrong with those probably be on discipline black church. he was

there in forcing a lot to meet in the crime, to quote, disturb schools in any way. that means any disturbance that any kids causes in school is by using force is never pretty for necessary. a tops people were never gonna change your mind so people will never change their minds about the video. they think i was wrong, and that's it. there's no end in sight over how you're going to continue to destroy the or is the case of the med, most of the people i tried to go to the gym, but i'm certainly not ready to fight russia. this is also of soon. this is the 3rd world lunacy re washington, as for so sunderland likes to say we have the tools while we just start with stability and business deals to help me living on that. we have very quick propaganda. you know, a price here in new york. i think we don't know the aftermath any time that you're not allowed to ask questions, you should ask all of the questions. some more questions ask a better. the answer is will be

the listing is the new jews who is asked and choose for many centuries, where they may best acute at once, bullshit games or pressed. and nobody can know, it seems that the bodies in young smoke you by the same the the what is part of the visit that the employee would posted isn't the defense you of us and that in the word part is it something deeper, more complex might be present, let's stop without collisions. let's go products.

as the the welcome to was a part, as present to make sure every mark more than a century ago, everything is learned in comparison with the prospect of a full scale war between israel and iran. humanitarian does us think of something we seems like a crisis of a 2nd or perhaps even a 3rd order is the possibility of an interest state more in the middle east likely