that went to upset to flaw. so when you put a full full charge load on the move some sol suite the the already impose sanctions on more than a 100 chinese entities export controls, etc. and we're fully prepared to actually take additional measures, black mailing in beijing, us secretary of states threatening china over its support of russia. continues

uncle sam's sanctions all ready to strike? nestle faces, criticism for pushing a sugar pack, baby for minutes in developing nations fall offering healthy aversion for western market for the green. the fields sold by in this instance in on our without with any added sugar. while in the countries you find 2 grams on average in that product, it's a clear thoughts down the sugar here, no sugar. there either is or us side, as i said, throwing out most of a so called mt terrorism forces, from chad for codes form a foreign minister search. it's time for the confidence to solve its own problem. the kind of interventions that we have been going on to find outside of ourselves. we, we have, we have the capacity within ourselves to do to do what needs to be done. reliance when people from outside is very close.

the a lot of people to try it. you know, today's geo political chessboard. it's so good to have you with us for this hour on off. see, how is washington turning up the heat on china over the confidence in ukraine. but us secretary state antony blinking has an open leaf, progressing to beijing with new sanctions. if it doesn't cut off its support for russia, a vision cannot achieve better relations with europe. while supporting the greatest threat to european security since the end of the cold war. as we told china for some time, ensuring transatlantic security is a for us interest. and our discussion today, i made clear that china does not address this problem. we will, we've already impose sanctions on more than a 100 chinese entities, export controls, etc. and we're fully prepared to,

to act take additional measures. and i made that very clear your mind to use the past. what i mean, what you heard down to the blinking say that was essentially a direct threat to trying to do what we will need to do, or we're going to impose even more functions on your country. not really giving china much of an option. the statements months, me blink to new incredibly strong, annoying that has the centurylink pulled out the us for its own hypocrisy. and that's because it said, you know, the us that just passed this massive for an, a bill with $61000000000.00 us dollars being sent to ukraine, which is 5 thousands upon thousands of miles away. and yet, at the same time, us criticizing china for having good freight relation with one of its neighboring countries. that is russia, that's happened listening to the chinese foreign ministry, have to say about that. may probably be a $200000.00 while you're on the one hand. the u. s. has launched

a large scale built a new crane. and on the other hand, it has made endless accusations against the normal economic and trade relations between china and russia. this is extremely hypocritical, any responsibility, or nato bears, and irreparable responsibility for the crisis. the alliance must reflect on its role, stop shifting, blame, and effectively take practical actions to resolve the crisis. politically, that's definitely a strong statement by showing that in regards to what's happening in ukraine. it is being a country that has been quite to be mutual about the conflict until not. but it really seems to think of a landing evasion in making the sort of common see has in those threats of sanctions of really well the chinese up. what isn't that what russia has been saying all along, but need to getting involved in a conflict? yeah, that's why we've heard a lot about the instability that need to creates wherever it is in the world. let's not forget for us as no just part nature. but it's also the biggest fund of nato

intends both the money that it puts in. and we've just heard from the russian defense minister, the specific issue who is at another meeting is the meeting actually with his chinese counterpart in catholic stone. and he has said, yes, again, it is instability that russia were seeing on its own just on the west, not just him ukraine, but also with the board with england, a huge for to that. and the baltic nations as a result of natives presence that's happened. listen to what you have cited pressure, particularly. i want to emphasize that it was not us, but the day who came to us came to our borders. this once again shows that westerners can not be trusted. now we're being told that a for actually is not stopped in ukraine, then we will supposedly attacked the countries of the lines. the russian federation has never threatened naples, who have neither jo, political, more military interest to attack the states of that book. we're simply protecting our people in our historical territories. we have always made every effort to

maintain strategic stability and the balance of power in the world. the united states on the country 1st created and is now deliberately prolonging the conflict in ukraine. and we've also got a issue with taiwan, taiwan. it's an island that is part of china overall. it's just to the south of the mainland. china has this one china policy. i'm not something that the us says, it acknowledges. but at the same time, when it passed for an age bill will be sold up money going to ukraine. it was a $1000000000.00 worth of money that's been allocated for taiwan and not is for a to taiwan, including military $8.00. and that is always the really something that china was very unhappy about because it sees the issues in taiwan as being domestic. and the chinese foreign ministers essentially told us both out about domestic issues. china is, concerns are consistent. we always call for respect to each other's core interest

and urge the united states not to interfere in trying his internal affairs. not to hold china's development back and not to step on china's red lines on china, sovereignty security and development interest. and then there are the tensions generally in the south china sea use the u. s. which has no territory right close to the chinese mainland. as somebody does, it is going to hold joint maneuvers with the japanese and the philippines towards the end of 2024. as you can imagine, china is pretty unhappy about us warships potentially being that close to it's territory and just keep you an example. if the chinese had a worship that close to hawaii, i think we'd see some reactions from the white task according to want to contribute our college. he believes that stuffing the sciences on china, it will only speed up a see change in the global economy. a linton is basically threatened me to

expand sanction. so china, i mean you, us have currently maintaining somebody comes out per sanctions by us have threatened to use financial sanctions on chinese companies and chinese banks that do business with russia and others quite serious threats. china would not be emitted by red additional sanctions. i mean china have phase us sanctions before the china will find a way and us sanctions on russia has already cost of russia to move off of dollars that kicked off the trend of the dollarization. now if us is going to move on the financial sanctions on china, you're going to see the world's largest economies moving off dollars. i mean, this is gonna co have huge consequences in the world financial market.

china will find out sir, it is, i mean now the brakes is already talking about a common bricks courtesy us policy is gonna just give it additional push or just tony type box the out here in moscow for many new bones. it's a bottled product for gross planes, but food dried nestle, is offering a less healthy version to for his baby, for motor and developing nations. it's proving bad news with new mothers. we heard from the hong gabrielle from the tate and carrying out there for so the full, the green up the on sold by in this thing, switched it on are without any added sugar. while in low and middle income countries, you find 2 grams on average in that product. and the situation is to be 9 key or the markets. we've also had to look at germany phones and the u. k, which are the main markets from this the in europe. and the situation is to say, no, uh most baby cereals been going up, you know,

a product sold by and that's the whole. so without any edits you there. so we confronted nicely with our findings and their response is basically that they comply with all national leisure stations. and international stumbles and this is true. but as i mentioned, they are the one. they have a huge influence on the weight and national legislations and codecs. thumbs up are being developed. and so of course they comply with those standouts. it's a clear those stand on the sugar here. no sugar there. but that's one that's, i mean the sugar is available. they want to edit, they just added the remove. it's in switzerland, in europe for other reasons, because they know that consumers don't accept it anymore. and i don't think the babies in africa and asia or in any other allowing me to come country like more sugar and bathing suits and i'm the one year up. so the report compare the sugar call and kind of 2 of nestle is best selling baby food brands and low and middle income comes in thailand,

ethiopia and india. there was up to 6 grams of sugar past subbing surprisingly, the same brands in europe had no sugar. so reporting from is an easy a, a correspondence perfect enough to put a my name's mastication by zurich. bass. watch the public eye and the international b. b, food action network has her feels that nestle, the global food and beverage dry and f, x for sugar and honey to and from milk em serial. product sold in developing countries compared to what is the same product sold in market indonesia report. so we decided to see for ourselves i went to 4 different supermarkets in the capital jakarta, to look forward to sarah like instance serial and need to a powder mill squared. naturally, a renamed the product to den count in indonesia. i found that sarah black is not a common product to find in supermarkets compared to other local options. but we

managed to find the instant serial in the last store. i visited it based on the information on the packaging. sarah, look, instance serial has 5 to 15 grams of sugar per serving. this particular flavor at the milk and honey has 15 grams of sugar per serving while den called meals contains 10 to 15 grams of sugar for serving. this one has 15. it is not always easy for consumers to tell whether it's added sugar and how much is present only based on personal information that's being printed on the package. properly. i reported that this particular flavor and then call one and then called one plus one seal in indonesia. has 0.8 grams of added sugar per serving in the form of honey. however, none of this information is printed on the packaging. this has proved negative reactions from worried families around the country. in response,

the government is trying to keep down the storm of anger by ensuring that the products in circulation has met all the nutritional requirements including sugar, salt of an even set. the new nation food and drug monitoring agency created be held to your choice logo to help people choose how to your package products. one of the requirements is that sugar content must be below 6 drams per a $100000000.00 leaders for each bar fridge package. nestle uses this loophole to give producing the baby formula in indonesia, something that natalie chose not to do in the european market. while it's claim that it hasn't broken any of the countries guidelines all day as well. the world health organization recommends that added sugar should be completely avoided in the 1st year of life of the ledges that we applied double standards between countries and our baby food portfolio and the some of our baby food brands contain excessive

ad and sugar. 3 port, a ledges that nested these practices ignore w h o guidelines that is simply not true. the public does not take this matter lightly. many customers feel disappointed that they are risk their children's health, while trying to give the best option for their development. said you go to those and for them i just found out about this information. why are these different ingredients for nestle? they should be able to maintain all products in all countries with the same standards. i mean, if it is depending she, what is the basis for the action of buy? because the company is because nesta should be able to equalize all these products with a house, then the 5, whether it's in asia, europe, or anywhere else, it should be the same model sponsor the can see ma'am, i think this can be considered as probably deception because every product must be accountable for what it sells, when they don't ride what's really in the products that can home the consumers. why does this lead do that in indonesia?

why isn't sure to edit in products around here being countries? there should be accountability from this with to clarify this, the ingredients is the number one thing i have to pay attention to. this finding is concerning. looking at the increased rate of ability in low and middle income countries including indonesia, indonesia are recorded the number of abuse children age 5 to 19 years has increased 10 fold. and the last 4 decades. a matter that many families around the nation are keenly aware off while the government is working to advocate millions of families. additional sugar that might lead to obesity is the last thing that the country meets exceeding in takes a few good. not only for children for, for instance, um, also for dogs, except uh, consuming sugar. it can be a problems. one of it is obviously if the, the sugars candle is something bigger, young children who get used to sweet flavors start to seek sweeter foods. this

starts a negative feedback cycle that increases the risk of nutritional disorders in adulthood, including obesity, diabetes, and high blood pressure. global foot conglomerates such as nestle should really take responsibility for their actions. if they are true, aim is to contribute to creating a good healthy life. the united states has to pull out most of its special forces troops with a central african nation of chad. however, dependent on says that will be back. that is talks continue with chatting. officials, us after com is currently planning to re position some u. s. military forces. from chad, a portion of which we're already scheduled to depart. this is a temporary step as part of the ongoing review of our security cooperation, which will resume after chads may 6th presidential elections. these developments are a black eye for the american foreign policy,

especially considering how hard the by that administration attempted to avert this outcome. but essentially off the chad cold on the united states, with all its troops from an army base in the country. the united states finally gave in and decided that it will be towards me as early as next week, despite some uncertainty about with the washington state. as a forces agreement to with chad can continue, will be negotiated. the initiates of came straight from chad, even though many reports make it seem like washington is the drawing at his own liking. and that this does come off to the u. s. agree to, to withdrawal. it's more than $1000.00 service members covering fees. i'm deployed in the z. the u. s. has tried to call to vote. it's itself raw the with the military machines in both chad and new. ze, i'm hoping to preserve long standing counter terrorism ties and to, to maintain millage c assets, including the $100000000.00 joint base,

situated in the news here. and so 2 of august is that to act to as the have before the veiling, much of the entire as to how region. and during the cruise, when some of these african countries kicked out the french military and as a wisdom back security deposit is the us government to misread the signals and come to us to the moves and the action as a win for them. and this is what to put when the news every indeed a ship over and dictates the terms even with the lights of just but then also when it comes to chad, the situation is a bit of a different dynamic because jazz, who was not to overturn the system but to preserve the system. we've also seen report stating that the u. s. and chad have agreed that to the period following the upcoming tab in presidential election is an appropriate time to review, secure your to corporation. 1 may read into that and seeing that there will be

a view configuration of the relationship between side and the united states after the election. and i think this goes back to watch. a lot of people are saying that the most significant aspect of these coming elections in chad is not the final results, but was of the extent to which the ellipse should lead a ship will be able to navigate the complex political issues and continue the transition towards a more inclusive and democratic system, what we all get to on the bond as well, is that to advertise never been a top priority for the united states. oh, you is need is more impactful, initiates of the but the administration devoted only limited episode attention to the continent. and russia is offering governments in africa, a survival package, a received something that the united states has never been able to. that's why african deed is an o oscar and russia to train due to at this moment. i think one of the american generals will visit the country this week to determine

a withdrawal. but we would like russia to join our troops. that includes the conduct of battle and the use of weapons. we're interested in buying weapons. it says city african nations are increasingly standing up to wisdom power was rejecting their continued termination. meanwhile, and the democratic republic of the congo un peacekeeping mission has closed one of its key bases the, the rest of it should be all wrapped up by the end of the year. it's basically off of the d. i. c, told the group to go home. earlier, we spoke to the full months, south african foreign minister. i listened to a student who says it's time for the content and to be allowed to deal with. it's a problem. we have, this is on the african continent. we have the, there is officers on the african continent. we have the wisdom, the african continent. we don't really need the kind of interventions that we have been going on to find outside of ourselves. that age, who has the capacity to has the power. it has the will and perhaps we should be

urging to intervene. time use leave, and rely on the african continent to solve african problems today. several, you in peace, keep peace keeping. mission happens. come on that various kinds of criticism. and i ask you this, why do you is taking that the you, when on the african continent from east to west, not the south us struggling to do the jobs, especially keeping peace and returning normalcy to those countries? well, i don't know why they're struggling. we've, we've had been called upon as a, as a, as a sub african government to intervene. and in a free place where we've intervened, we have been able to lay down standards. we've been able to lay down timeframes. and we've noticed we've driven back to that. we had available for peacekeeping purposes. we don't have to go outside to fetch the united states. uh me to come in

to the case in africa and we, we have own institutions. and perhaps a uni would, would need to explain why it is that, uh, you know, we would have an evident part of the, of the continent running to the united states when we are there we, we, we have, we have the capacity within ourselves to do to do what needs to be done? a reliance on people who from outside is very colonial. we should be over that by now on the shoulders of war to and gaza appear, which is taking shape that will supposedly be a bridge head if we can monitor and aid has come on, the fire being built by the united states. so the same country, this weapon icing is well the question is do remain on its ultimate purpose. a correspondent picks up a story off of this un statement on the attack. a, a u. n. team was visiting the jetty and staging area for this proposed by the time

operation turnaround scheming, about a 100 meters away. no injuries. they went into the bunker for some time and then continued the tool. well, at the beginning of march, president vida, in order to build a dark off guys, a city shore to bring relief to the war torn talley student and clave the pool, which will reportedly cost us more than 100 an $18000000.00. when ready, we're here at the beginning of may. the us says they will be able to deliver some 2000000 mills a day. well, all of that may sound like good news, right? but the big question remains, whether all these efforts were really necessary and will it actually change things on the ground? the argument is that the pool will provide relief specifically to the north of gaza . that is now hard to reach because of severe fighting between his really forces and military this but with the port will the problem actually be solved? a 3rd party is supposed to be driving trucks down the pier onto the beach and

deliver human hearing aids further to those in need with israel providing security for convoys. again, by the said, no american troops on the ground, no american security forces, meaning no extra protection for the aid. and that is how it works now with big concerns raised over is really capability to secure a desperate they needed cargo mass after dudley incident. early in april, when 7 humanitarian workers were killed in n, as rarely as tri, at the time they were delivering age 2 thousands exactly in the area where the u. s . is now building the pier washington doesn't seem to be concerned. march, here is how 10 to go and commented on. the recent incident with the un personnel coming on the fire were aware of reports that a small number of murders landed in the vicinity of the marshalling yard area for humanitarian assistance that will eventually be the delivery site that, that disappear will support. it's important also to highlight that this occurred

before any us forces, you know, have started moving anything, there'll be no us forces on the ground. and it knows, i understand it in terms of the, you know, there, there is no us equipment per se. in this marshalling yard and other question regarding this america sponsor reports, what's wrong with land roads for the un and high ranking? humanitarian aspirants repeatedly said that they are the best and most effective for humanitarian aid delivers a more effective than married time roads. now there are just 3 overland roads to send a 2 guys through including 2 crossings active both with egypt that spring a to this trips southern pars, and one northern road recently opened that is dramatically insufficient. when else we kilometers from aris cross. and you can see the sign behind me guys aboard the area has been declared the closed military zone and we were not allowed to get any closer. but that's the point we used to take to go to god. so you get straight to

the guys of c 2 in the north of the in clave where hundreds of thousands of people currently crowding. it's a short called and it's small to use is ro, close the truck out of the war and gaza started on never opened it back. unclear why the problem eventually not sold and washington is spending millions of dollars on the gas appear while it's efficiency is yet to be proven. the us also proved to spend another bill in all of us dollars on humanitarian assistance. something the president biden seems very proud off for guessing that the same bill improved spending $17000000000.00 to help israel was most of a go into weapons funding for these really are let's take a listen and we've been working totally for months to get as much a to guys as possible. this bill includes $1000000000.00 from additional

humanitarian aid in gosh, and israel must make sure all the say breaches of palestine isn't guys without delay. so there are many questions regarding washington's way to help. sending relief to guys is dying on the america fund. that is really bonds. that is why many say now that instead of building the price, the poor $10.00 guys of washington could have been focusing on putting even more pressure on israel in order to increase the deliveries for existing roads, or even better to stop sending arms to as well as support israel and paved the way to ending the war. the us defense secretary has confirmed that ukraine will soon start receiving the much anticipated f. $165.00 hundreds towards us and all of which shopping frequently hype. as a game changer. we provided more than 3000 armored vehicles, including more than 800 main battle tanks. we've given ukraine tens of thousands of

anti tank missiles of this year. more than a squadron of donated f sixteens will start to arrive in ukraine, along with pilots and maintainers trained by members of this contact group. and this contact group continues to step up to meet ukraine's most urgent needs circulating united states. they all hi ping up the shipment on this. so supply all the up 16 fighter jets. and they are in the dist, selling it as a game changer. you know, piece of equipment that will help the ukrainians on the battlefield. the key of into and, and presidents the landscape. they have been doing the same on the parts but well, the role and this has been moved to kind of, well the united states. they have been training ukrainian pilots for quite a while now. apparently they now the see of those recruits ready to take up in the on them selves and carry out live missions again when the deliberations were going

on. and when all the discussions on the supply of the $165.00 digits were going on, the russian president vladimir, who he showed his, uh, basically how he sees the situation and how much of 16 will be able to change on the battlefield. in his opinion, not the condition of january to the right. no, no. canadian nato has been drawn into the world in ukraine. they supply heavy vehicles. the option of supplying aircraft is currently being considered. there things are burning, including the leopards. they are burning, and the f sixteens will also burn as well. there is no doubt, but if they are located at bases and broad and used in hostilities, we will have to look at how to hit them. there is a serious danger of drawing nato further into this conflict in russia has been wanting time and time again that well, any escalation will be met accordingly, appropriately and proportionately. now, the united states is sending these up 16 fi to just clearly an escalation. now the

tricky part is a very, very dangerous fuss about this is the russia has been trying to take out the landing strips of ukrainian military airports vases. that's what re fits it's. so ukraine was re fixing it's military facilities. it's uh, it's airports so that they are able to launch these f sixteens into, into, into the, yeah, because ukraine previously it had no such infrastructure as it was in the process of re purposing and just re refurbishing the infrastructure. russia has been targeting these add ports, and so just so to, to prevent ukraine from using it. and if it's, of course, we'll see how successful russia was doing so. but if it was, then ukraine might have no other option but to fly on to launch these as sixteens from the facilities that abroad and say in poland for example, and rush.