and neo nazis on the west of the compass is well hold up, pay like cowards, using civilians as human shields. but today is know about them. today is about the liberal right is on the liberated fly, was it being late here with this new, the restored monument as locals and soldiers, unofficial, remember the atrocities that took place in the fall as a fatality and had his headquarters in the safety using as a face from which they terrorized the local media decades level of them. what do, what are those is a very, very important dates for the city of my rio pole because it is the 2nd then of a 3. i'll leave the ration as parts of the russian federation. the city is recovering, developing, and there's no doubt that it will be one of the best cities in russia. unfortunately, the neo nazis left a lot of explosive objects that have to be destroyed either on the spot or in a landfill. good, we're doing everything possible. so the mary paul becomes a common cheerful resort city. let's talk about it. on february 24th 2022. no one

knew yet that this would happen in our country. i was sitting at home and the computer watching my desk just facing the window. and suddenly the shooting started . it was coming either from the lap in hill or something on a shroud of smoke over the east. the war had begun. that you all said go look before hunger and cold, said you. people who went out to get food or water were killed, but they were lying right on the road. as all soon, each, the other fighters were exterminating us whenever they showed us. we run to the basements. when the showing stopped, we would come back out. they just stood there and shuddered us so we had to stay in the basement. so why did the western media say about it? they were told a story by the ukrainian knew or not so, so they simply repeated it. but we are the ones with survived it all here. a russian flag on felt stretching the length of the square and the city center, a symbol of the liberation of my view, po, ribbons along with pride as a people had expressed that russian ident,

the beauty watched the media. the 1st thing that really stupified me was the corpses of civilians lying everywhere. there were a lot of bodies, but no one had cleaned them up. at the same time, there was shooting, artillery and mortar fire everywhere. it was a terrible sight. everything was destroyed and in flames. anybody's address the fighters came, stood between the houses, fired and then left. but then the return fire came and hid civilians. as off did whatever they wanted to the people were showing you so much. i personally saw a man come up to them to ask something, only to be shot. there was complete lawlessness, more and more of those that committed atrocities here and now being held to account with lengthy jail sentences being handed down. for some, this is an essential part of the rebuilding process. of others. the punishment is nothing. now. these are fighters or animals, they must be eradicated. simply exterminated, don't leave a single one. they must all be cleanse. reconstruction gathers pace with support from locals and volunteers from across the russia. that's not even the full rise

from the ashes. and the people say never again. this is stace, where you, me for all to embody people. well that, so we've had time for this style, but they stay with us. so on all as many electron has the move this offer on base. the hello, i'm an electron. you're turned into modus operandi with the death of queen elizabeth, the 2nd in 2022. many around the world said this was the sun. finally setting on the british empire. less than 2 years into the reign of king charles the 3rd. the royal family is now planed with more controversy than ever before. we'll discuss these author romanticize royals and see if the facts align with the fairy tale. all

right, let's get into the m o. the is a family whose story goes back hundreds of years and spans the world over the house of windsor is a story one for some there the beloved heroes of world history books. for others, there are the villains who oppressed and exploited nearly one 3rd of the planet. now loved them or hate them, there is no dispute that the late queen elizabeth clan, left an indelible mark on the world, shaping it to be what we know it as today. now, under the reign of king charles, the house is in turmoil. the freshly coordinated king rumored to be suffering from advanced pancreatic cancer with an unsubstantiated prognosis of just 2 years left to live. here to break it all down is

a good friend of the show. this sean stone. sean is a filmmaker historian and author of the book, new world order, and you can learn more about shawn's work at shawn stone dot info. so shawn, let's start with the revelation that came. charles has cancer. now he assumed the throne in the fall of 2022, after his mother, the longest reigning model monarch, the late queen elizabeth the 2nd. after she passed away, his official coordination was just may of 2023, less than a year after that. this cancer news. but little else is known about his health. you know exactly what sort of cancer, what stage it's in, et cetera. why is the palace keeping so mom about this? and should they be so private? should they should that? that's it, that's a, that's a, that's a tough question. you know, because who am i to speak for the royalty this? this pretends this facade that has been going on for over a well over

a 1000 years now in england. and, you know, it's, it's not a surprise to me. i hate to say it, but i can, i can tell you exactly how just do a mixture of, of intelligence and tuition and other people, you know, i say intelligence, it's like intelligence services types. and basically it's like i knew that charles as rain would be very short lived. let's put it like this. and so i'm predicting that whether it's through passing or just simply stepping down because of health. things like this that charles was really just an intermediary step. and i think a lot of people expected this to, to williams assuming this wrong. oh, yeah, i figured the sad irony here was that, you know, queen elizabeth just kept going and going and going, you know, never stepping down. and charles awaited his chance to roll. he's now in his

seventies. he waited a long time only to be diagnosed with cancer a year later that this one would have good fit. and i think, you know, to be honest it was. ringback and again, this is an american perception perhaps, but i don't think a lot of people ever really expected charles to to be k. there was a lot of talk even when elizabeth was around, that it was just sort of pass, you know, right away to william that he was really the era parent and child. so sort of the idiots on, i hate to say, well, i mean that's kind of the way that he presented to be honest, ever since the days of diana, you know, and when it was sort of the divorce was obviously very messy from the world perspective. you know, that like having to go through that, that experience, i'm sure. right. they, they like to keep it all classy and clean and divorces aren't that. and that from that point forward i think um, you know, it's,

it was really kind of just for view. the charles was, was, was kind of the intermediary for his, for his son. well then, a month after king charles is announcement, princess kate, middletown wife of the future. king william, she puts out a social media video announcing her cancer diagnosis and that she's undergoing chemo therapy. no specifics there either. but then she gets roiled in this sort of weird botched photo re touched drama for you came mother's day. i mean, i get that she's a royal, she's a celebrity and, and get subjected to perhaps unfair and, and certainly on equal scrutiny. but at the end of the day, she saw a person right of me. she's a mom of 3 young children. she's fighting cancer, shouldn't she being granted a little grace or given some slack here it has, as i said, the beginning, you know, the appearance of the pretense of royalty. there is no humanity in it. i think

princess diana was, was an agree expression of that in the ninety's. you know, she, she was hard pressed by the royal family, the by the, the, the, all the drama that came around the divorce, the attacks, the, you know, the way that she had to basically show up in the world. it was, it was a lot of stress for her. and i think that it, kate is living through very similar, you know, dramatics, let's say the scheming that goes on because it's the same whether it's a, you know, political administration is one thing, right? we know that as f d i said if it's happens in politics, you know, it was planned that way. well, imagine you're a part of a family of dynasty, right? that's hundreds of years old and has to, has to, let's pretend for, hey, that's the whole point. it's all about pretending it's all about selling an image, keeping up this pretence that we, we have this sovereignty in his power that the rest of you wish to admire. and we can see where they sell. i mean,

how much news and media is just focused on the daily happenings, right. of, of someone in the royal family it's, it's the celebrities of, of, of europe, right. of, of england in particular, it's that old celebrity attraction that, you know, sells magazines in america as well. um that's what the real family is. so you, knowing that understanding that the celebrity side of things, you know, i understand pretty well like how much the private side is used basically for exploitation and also hidden. because if too much is developed from the private, you can end up losing the fascination or you don't wanna lose your audience as they say. and of course, the whole, you know, the british and the british commonwealth is the audience of everything happening with kate. so of course it would be nice to say yes, she's a human being, but the royal family is, he could say this ironically is not quite human. all right, so princess kate is taking this reprieve of royal duties for obvious health reasons . but prince harry and wife american actress megan markelle,

have simply chosen to step away from the royal family in its entirety. now they're just living, i guess the celebrity life in california. next to oprah. for her part though, meghan merkel told oprah in an interview before the queen died, that she felt the family was racist towards her. i mean, she doesn't name names, but in fact, and i'm paraphrasing here. she said she and, and her 1st baby archie were discriminated against. the palace has fervently denied these allegations. but given the royal families, no history of conquest and colonialism. kind of not a far fetched idea. we know racism exist and why does the world care more about this particular allegation? i don't know if the world well, i don't know if the world cares more and necessarily it's more sensational, right. the media can play it up because it's being charged against someone who has

received at that time. you know, the queen is as powerful person. and, and so of course, you know, if you're making allegations against 5 people, it's going to be played up as long as the media wants to play it up. as we know there is often times allegations made against profit people that are suppressed. so in this case, the media want to play it up and there's probably some truth to it. i mean, again, the nature of this monarchy, this british empire has been one. as you mentioned, of, of conquest at one point at the height of the empire. they control the quarter of the planet. so that was, you know, and that led to how many desks, for example like india is you know, what, it needs the various indian families that occurred as a result of the various policies. you know, from the, for the british, imposing upon them, uh, shifting their economy. obviously throughout africa there were been all kinds of brutal wars and not just, you know, for a conquest of things like gold and diamonds. right. but the establishment of

institutional systems that were based on exploitation and you know, so there's a long history here. obviously, you can argue that also the british empire liked the roman empire, which was also brutal lead to the establishment of what is now, you know, considered modern civilization, the legal structures, the economic structures. they're based from those. but it's what ality them so obviously is not just, you know, the crown, but the crown, it is a very powerful it entity in itself and its own right in terms of the land, whole thing in terms of the nature of, of the influence, right? they have sovereign immunity, these kings and queens and their families. so there's um, there's a lot that can be said in terms of the influence that they've had. and, and it was interesting, i think that, you know, this notion of megan and harry sort of fleeing that establishment. i don't know, like i personally question how much is this? you know them just wanting to live their life without being under constant scrutiny

and under constant. well, i guess there are under costs really, but let's say like under the protocols of the royals, right. the way that we talked about an hour, you know, with kate it's like you're under constant protocol and decorum. whereas these guys like listen we, we want to enjoy them. the rich is the well, the status that comes with the want to be able to be it has some freedom and that's probably what they're doing at some level. all right, coming up next. some people are above criminal prosecution. they claim by divine right. as a sovereign, how does this antiquated ideas still exist in the 21st century? we'll discuss it when we return with shawn stone. said type m o will be right back . the when i was wrong. just don't

you have to safe house the economy and engagement equals the trail. when so many find themselves will to parts we choose to look for common ground the the the, the other unit on up what sky o'neill was the when you talk, talk to the ball. got them for the, for the book, the job. i don't know what if i've the money for the theater? if i've heard of the mid views to them, please just w as in like you,

especially with really a couple i get those go for need a lot more. so those are the doors of familiar with that so much. yeah, i don't know the shape. logistic area that makes sense. yeah. and then with, with the assessment, when you put in your article here, that'd be the the welcome back to the m o m l a. chance sean stone, thank you for sticking around with us. so shawn in, in queen elizabeth final years. she had a lot of a personal and family strife to deal with specific ways surrounding her younger son, prince andrew, and his ties to the deceased, financed ear and convicted, sex offender, jeffrey epstein. andrew is basically an accused child rapist, according to virginia,

drew fray. the queen then basically banished andrew from all of these royal events . but as well, status has protected him from being served lawsuit papers from being expedited to the west. his title has saved his hide from prosecution. if the royal family are mostly just figure heads, why are they seemingly above international law? well, they literally are mean sovereign immunity is exactly that. sovereign immunity. which means that really, you know, once you're a sovereign, you are above loss because the laws are written for commenters. i mean that's, this is my fundamental problem with the nature of royalty. and in, in, in the old world capacity, you know, my mentality is like every human being should be regarded as, while by nature of the divinity. right? that's just part of the american constitutional conception or the declaration that we are created very much in the biblical sense. in the image of god,

by the power of god, right? with certain in a unalienable rights, that's not a british conception. the british conception is, is very much rights taken from the king's basically whether it's through magna carta, whether it's through various, uh, you know, barons and other titled nobility, right, nights and others trying to basically assert their rights. these are the, this is crown that had, basically, that was, you know, in the old was very much continuation of roman imperialism. right? the idea that the, the king is the christ of the christ to figure, i'll say the god of are the most, the, the, the god on earth works through the king or the queen. right? they have divine right to rule. and basically then they grant power is the grant titles, the grant lands, right, the grant you liberties, that's the old mortality of, of the legal system. and we all actually still operate under those same conceptions,

right? our, our legal system is all derived from that. and wouldn't know whether it was the king's or in america became the government. but it was in many ways the opposite of this more, let's say the, the american principle, which is really like the biblical principle that like it's actually god that is giving us our rights as every one of us equally as humans. and then we get to sort of come together and decide ok, what powers we give to, you know, governments or whatever police forces, right. but it's fundamentally supposed to be through the people in america. dreamland, obviously not the same. so that's, that's to answer your question in a long, long way. why he can get away with this. and that into more, you know, in a more interesting capacity, it's not just is not just him. the whole world family has been in imbued with pedophile charges for going back to mountain, at least to lord mount that don't forget who was the cousin to the queen was very

influential in prince philip, who i think was very nefarious figure within the real family. but obviously philip was the husband of elizabeth, non baton was notorious pedophile across the world. the notorious for, for a look into the look into it. basically look notorious for traffic in, in the, especially like the indian, you know, young indian boys and things like this. and yeah, not that and actually was i believe brought jimmy salbal into the fall. ready or was connect was very close to jimmy's apple who was became very, very close to the brown family. right. and who was apple? the torres pedophile of cross decades protected by this establishment. sample was so close to the royal family that they have assigned him to at one point to try to liaise between diana and charles during their divorce. so the, you know, the idea of, of, of the these roles being involved with pen ophelia has this, is,

this is a, this is an old and problematic issue that has never really been on, or i, yeah, rules for me, not for me as a solver and i guess seems profoundly outdated, but that's just me. i'm not a royal watcher so all this is, is actually news to me, but also not shocking either. if that makes sense. um. now, speaking of sex scandals, another sex scandal has recently befell the palace this time concerning hip hop mobile, sean p diddy combs photos have surfaced prince william and harry hanging out with duty who is now accused of similar crimes. as jeffrey epstein that we should know at the time of this taping, did he has not had any charges brought against him despite you know that big federal raid on his home in los angeles. currently the palace of scrambling the distance, the 2 princes from ditty with all these things taken into account. are we beginning

to see the fall of the house of windsor is? is the crown crumbling? i think, you know, honestly, with the, with the passing of elizabeth. there was some things sort of symbolic, right? in terms of that passing and ever since then again, they said there's, there's a, there's a, there's a expectation that this is about the preparation of william what william do, right? when he assumes this wrong, will he be that sort of our story and figure to say, listen, you know, this is we need to this band, this whole 1st is mockery that we're, you know, we call the ro, royal family and royalty. in the modern age. it's just, you know, we need to dissolve this when we do that in the magnanimous sense and say, i'm not above you, you know, the people we are all the same. or will they just simply try to carry this on? because again, i mean there's a lot of as much as the psychology right. the,

this ecology that people have when they, they think of their royalty in england. i've, you know, i've talked to it over the talk over the years and i was just always fascinated by like, why, you know, why do you still have to get king or queen in that capacity? and they, it was like this and installed you, right. i guess the same way that in america we have the style to for our founding fathers, it's, you know, this are 3 enrollments. you know, it's been like, well, it's tradition and they've just the know they've been the sort of stabilizing for us. and there's a mythology that, that develops around, you know, i guess around that concept of king queen ship in your, you know, in that land. but they also, it's not just figure heads, you know, they literally have a huge amount of holdings. in fact, i think if you really got to the heart of it, who owns the land of england, and i would find, i think you'd find that it's basically the crown that owns the land and reads it to people or, or gives you know, title and holdings and things like this, but you need to be think of the needs, the entire structure, right, of, of,

of one and being late and not just thing. and obviously, you know, talking about the commonwealth, which as i mentioned, one point you know, is a quarter of the planet. they lost in the last, you know, parts of the last parts of africa. but there's still a huge number of countries around the world, including canada, australia, and others that are part of the commonwealth. and so is it the co pays at the crown? the still owns that land, right? but see that it basically said here you, this is, you can have a home rule, you know, and you can have a kind of, you know, some kind of authority over it, but fundamentally it's still belongs to the crowd. so it's a very, very complicated to actually dissolve the monarchy and it would affect all, i have huge gratifications, you know, across the entire commonwealth and, and as into starting with, with england, which is, you know, still a very wealthy country in the world, but how much of the wealth is tied to you can call like, you know, the crown issuing grants of title and land and things like this. i don't know if think william might shake the house to windsor up. well,

i don't know. i wouldn't suggest that he will. i mean, i think that would be fascinating if he did so. but as we, you know, as you were talking about, like, you know, are we seeing that the dissolution i, it's like, i don't, i don't know unless, unless william did something that was you know, structurally, again, magnanimous and above the capacity of what we've seen most, most kings would do okay, so more broadly, i'm a minority of countries left in the world operate on a monarchy system, $43.00 of them to be exact 13 of them outside of the u. k. recognize the british monarchy as the technical head of states from tiny islands like top one new guinea to big ones like australia, as you mentioned, our neighbors to the north canada, even the nearby bahamas recognized charles as king is a time to do away with monarchies altogether. and if so, replace them with what?

well, as i mentioned before, i made replace it with an american style, a constitution declaration, right? so basically you're creating a new system of, of trust where in the power of the grand torres, god, you know, the, the, the, all the, all knowing, all loving benevolent creator and the trustees of the gulf or the government. and you know, in the, in the beneficiaries are the people and then basically the, you know, the people are the ones that have to hold the trust these accountable for how things are going. and that's, and that's something that i think, you know, we, we know, we, we, we expect in america, obviously we've seen how the corruption is set in. now, you know, this establishing trends 2 party system is, has made it very difficult overtime and user patient of a lot of rights. we've seen just because of the radio, again, just emergency powers and things like this. we know more powers and other things

we've surrendered. our many of our, our fundamental rights and liberties because of the expectations, the government will do it better and take better care of us and keep our security and all this nonsense. but if you know, if you think about the fundamental constitution bill of rights, declaration of independence, i think america has got the, the best form of government possible and this current, you know, innovation of humanity. all right. i would say, god have mercy on those who pursue an american style democracy. i mean, i would argue our democracy is currently in shambles. i mean, why would anyone want to mimic us? because to be because you've, you've created a federal government that was, that's as far beyond what the founders ever envisioned federal government to do any is many user patient of, of, of rights that were funded mental and enshrined in our bill of rights. and the expectations of, of, you know, where we, the people were supposed to hold the government accountable. and basically, due to a mass, huge amount of corruption and the basic surrendering of rights. every time there's

an emergency which really started you can say with the civil war, but then got, you know, increased ever since 1933 with the roosevelt of declaring emergency because of the, the economic emergency he wanted war powers. and ever since then, we've basically been in a perpetual state of emergency. so whenever there was emergency, we just, well, the government is going to take more and more of your rights. more of the checks, you know, let's say the checks and balances system away. and as i said, the federal government was never intended to, to be as large and impactful in our, in our, in our economy, in our lives as it's become. all right, fair enough. i got to leave it right there shawn. unfortunately, shawn stone, filmmaker historian, author of the book, new world order. thank you so much for sharing your insights with us today. it's a pleasure, thanks for having me. and that is going to do it for this episode of modus operandi, to show that dig steep in the foreign policy and current affairs. i'm your host manila. chad. thank you for tuning in. we'll see you again next time and figure out

the m o the, the winds, largest democracy votes. the rest of the plan is watches in an emerging, multi polar world. indeed, as voice matters, but who will be the power behind watches, almost 1000000000 people decide. and billions more, react the along the casualties as a result of israel's genocidal assault on gaza. include suspension of international humanitarian law, but also free speech across the western world. perversely,

being pro palestinian and pro peace is condemned is and i submitted the israel's 5 minutes. the last you guys have been to national criminal, quotesoft chief prosecutor says he wants to bring in benjamin netanyahu. and his defense piece along with 3 inches of how much the down 12 klein. i rejected this the hey, prosecutor's comparison between democratic israel and the mass murderers of homos. this is a complete distortion of reality. this is exactly what the semitism looks like, the u. k. how i quote con julian this on the right. so p leads us extradition, given the whistle blow hope that he may not have to face the charges. the complete to spending a 175 years behind bars.