74, the virtual do you have sense of? who are we going to let that stay the same as the most massive 10 rounds of time with us to attack them? smith solves on the core. i mean, bridge with a flight time of less than 2 minutes, part of the missiles with shut down versa. intercept faced with us made missiles of the climbing in branch as being western drum beats increase in phase of allowing k of the swipe thing. and so russians higher trade we will continue to promote peace talks in our own way. stay in communication with all parties and work together to build the conditions for political settlement of ukrainian crisis. china refuses to participate in the swiss peace conference on ukraine next month. so i think that all sides of the conflicts must be involved on russia has the senior volunteers with an organization of the american justice system. that's the

us. how speak is pronouncements on the $34.00 guilty verdicts we gave. donald trump the very welcome. this is on the international with the world news update, as always is quite happy with us. a huge ukrainian south of us missiles targeting the crime me and bridge was intercepted by russian forces on wednesday. as according to the defense minister said k of the times to strike civilian infrastructure. so it's west and sponsors only want to escalate the wolf as a to put your lease to move forward. i would like to report that just on wednesday that was the most massive 10 round the tax with us attack. it was miss solves on the crime in bridge with a flight time of less than 2 minutes for the missiles was shut down, deprived of the opportunity to seize the initiative on the battlefield. the key of raising him continues to demonstrate to his western responses. its ability to

damage the russian federation by striking civilian infrastructure. the west is urgently pumping weapons in the crank, transmitting intelligence training, ukrainian establishment and recruiting muscle raised in this vein. russia is continuing its special ministry operation, and all of these goals will certainly be achieved as a result of all actions and important areas. they may call cold regions. the enemy has retreated by 8 to 9 kilometers this month. the line 28 supplements have been liberated. in total, 880 square kilometers of 10 are treat, have come under the control of the russian army this year. the russian on forces are systematically reducing the combat potential of the crating on forces in may the enemy, last the modem. $35000.00 service men and $2700.00 units of various weapons among them and $290.00 tanks and almond combat vehicles, including full abraham 7, the leopards, and 12. bradley. this is, well, it's very interesting context is very interesting as well as this was made at the c

s t o, which is the collective security as an organization which is like nasal excess wear brushes, allies, if you like, get together and discuss the security situation. last week we had president food and also in bel, russia. so this is also interesting where this was said, a new guy bellows off. he's an economist, he signifies a complete change of direction in some ways in which it regarding the defense industry. at more, uh, you know, the focus on value on producing the right kind of weapons, getting them to the front, a world renowned economist also. so that's very interesting is probably one of his biggest stages, so far as minister of defense. so it comes in a context where the west is almost obsessed in the media. with this idea of permission for weapons that are supplied, you're going to be used now to strike your crime. and in reality, and what we know is that the ukraine has been striking on the russian territory rush of proper, not the new territories for the last 2 years. basically on and off. we've seen

a tax in cousins, though. we've seen them in verona, is i've been in for amelia, attacked by drones. i've been in belgrade on direction to be attacked reporting from there. i've seen it with my i didn't imagine this. so this has been going on for some time. so this whole fund to see in the west that, you know, we'll, we won't, we allow these weapons to be used on the long list of countries. so nice, the setting a will be, won't we? it's been kind of dispelled in some respect by uh, dmitri pest, golf and marie is the heart of a, to very senior people in the political world here in russia and some of listen to what they have to say to them. in general, american made weapons are already being used and attempted strikes on russian territory. it is more than eloquent evidence of the extent of the united states involvement in this conflict. there is also an absolute build up of pro war sentiment in the you. they are deliberately full mentoring, pre war hysteria. but all of this of course cannot but have a very negative impact on the overall situation of tensions continue to escalate to

to it was up vs the need to numbers with lauren and putting up a smoke screen making up a story that they haven't yet decided whether or not to allow the key of regime to launch strikes using western weapons on the russian territory in the same way they mislead those who are trying to direct it to the conference in switzerland by telling tales about that space. full thoughtfulness, classic nature style manipulation. and so the message coming out of russia is, this is all, just some sort of political fisa from the west. i'm just wondering just how capable ukraine actually is on it. so, you know, without native support. well, the reality is, from a strategic point of view of from an analysis point of view, your train is now exceptionally reliant on western a financial aid. the economic aid of course, military item. you remember, joseph burrell not so long ago, suggested that it would take 2 weeks of to end the war from europe and america

stuff floating it with weapons and cash. and this is the reality, of course, you probably doesn't manufacture any of these long range weapons. it doesn't have any capacity to target them. and many other analysts have written about this. this is a completely hollow the country at this stage regarding the ability to wage this war . and very interesting, let him uproot themself has gone into great detail lining the reality of what's happening with the long range strikes from you find that it's not a huge pain doing it essentially that they have no satellite information. they have no targeting of that. it requires specialists from britain, germany, france to operate the systems of to try get them. that's all the listen to what you have to say on the list which nettles are basically then. this is new heights. precision was long range, weapons, custom cannot be launched without using space recognizance. in addition, the final target choice and the so called flight mission, but it can only be made by highly qualified specialist. and so, based on this technical intelligence,

it was who is doing this. this is done by those who produce and allegedly supply the systems to ukraine, the scan and does happen without the participation of ukrainian military personnel . and other systems are also being prepared on the basis of space exploration. yeah . and are automatically brought to the appropriate calculations because this task is being prepared not by ukrainian service men, but by representatives of nato countries. but these representatives of nato countries, especially in your or something else. they should generally be aware of what they are playing with. how many they should remember that they see some of them as a rule, but you have a state with a small territory and a very dense population when you much to and this is a factor that they should keep in mind before talking about striking deep into russian territory, this is a serious matter, and we are of course, watching it very carefully got through it's and you guys going. so it seems like it's a case of say, one thing do another for many of these western countries, which makes it a little curious when we see these powers giving

a so called official node to k of to attack russia with ne, so website. and so what, what can you tell us on this? well, it, it seems, there seems to be a pile of, of getting on board. now, as you know, as ukraine's more goes from bad to worse, it started with the counter offensive, which was always going to be a huge success. all the game change, the leverage, the challenge yours and you know, it is now it's the 16th, all of which of sale of all of which have been destroyed by russia in the background to this. there's a reality as well where there's, oh, at 1st tape, you know, the worst is the kind of actually trust what the west isn't. and that's been born out again and again from the men's good courts to negotiating to is stumbled. so when they got a deal done 3 weeks after the start of the some of the landscape of them pulled away from the table by bar as johnson and enforced washington with all the involved in the to. so interestingly, when it comes to this escalation will be, won't we allow you find to use these weapons? we're also seeing the same sort of double speak. let's have a look at some of the media reports where at, you know, the, what,

here's the thing. one thing for the media are saying the white us is actually saying another thing and probably best, let's have a blessed a as there's been no change in our policy. the security assistance that we provide ukraine is to be used within ukraine, and we don't encourage attacks or unable attacks inside of russia. so there's a kind of us gets a free you here. and it kinda underlines the point that doesn't seem to be a strategy in the west or on this forward motion. the only forward motion to west seems to have now regarding ukraine activity in an election year. no president of the united states wants to lose a war, have afghanistan to point though in the run up to the election. a lot of, uh, very focus you are paying careers are so invested in this war and ukraine, you know, the defeat of russia, of underlying the economies instead of all these things, which i've turned out to be completely untrue. yet as we see this escalation, correct, the leaders of big you put your pin cookies, power for your fee for the poland, fonts, and jeremy continue on the message with the escalation. that's what this new invest

executive model. so we're saying exactly within the same framework, we think that we should allow them to neutralize the military sites from which the missiles are fired. and basically, the military sites from which you crane is attacked within the several countries, including germany, have reached cleared agreements with ukraine on the use of western weapons. such a defensive struggle is not limited to one's own national territory, but can of course, also be extended to the aggressive national territory. fuel pulse cut belong to them because we always weapons that we're transferring to ukraine to not have any use restrictions. the greetings can fight the way they want, and i think this is a very, very important aspect of this donation. so, it all seems to demonstrate one thing. uh, when you look at this objectively that, you know, your client isn't a sovereign state anymore. it's not a southern state economically, it's not a southern state military. it seems that somebody else is deciding when you create a tax. one of the tax with that's asked permission that whether it can attack real,

she'll be on the sports that doesn't suggest a sovereign state. it's now go over into the lead boy of mine who is the fact though dictator states has no electoral mandate on president vladimir putin had to point out the intricacies of the ukrainian constitution at a few days back and pointing out that only the government now has a right to rule as the lensky has no right whatsoever. so it seems to be getting more more kilometers on the see if the only people to actually know what's going on and ukraine are the russians. let's take a 2 day informal meeting of the foreign ministers of nathan men. mistake swaps up in prague on friday. officials are likely to be discussing base. so think of restrictions on k of to allow the use of a supply weapons the swipe inside russian territory. the hung gary environmental safety alliance has moved closer than as a to physically entering the concept meals window. are you good? yeah, i mean we think that with the oldest proposals and all these ideas and data,

we're always taking you in even greater step in the direction of entering this for 2 and a half years ago. we decided to gather that tomato can not be a part of this one, and he's not allowed to have a direct confrontation between nato and russia while now and then it was getting closer and closer to a direct contradiction. not only would it clean, but also peace, which they ask about as a special correspondent of asia times on color list for the cradle, he told us the west is using ukraine to find because he does understands it comp face russia directly. every thing that is happening now concerns the incoming as i defy it, costs and make sure mediation of made so as a hole in the black style of nowhere to see it. this is the defining issue. now this decade and with the rubber cushion the decades ahead and the airplane v is . now we know, okay, let's allow the effective decision that has already being made. but now publicly

they're safe. let's allow ukraine to hates targets inside the russian federation, which everybody with the brain knows is the way towards nuclear confrontation. this is extremely dangerous. they look at the battlefield, they look at what's happening. the see. they see that russian adventures are inexorable. in fact, anything could happen within the next 234 months at the end of summer. and then we're going to have an even more dire circumstances for you. great, if we have, for instance f sixteens this summer coming to we all know what's going to happen to them. everybody knows that if we have these a tech m. s and storm shadows and sculpt vessels hitting serious severely and at targets inside the russian federation. then all bets are off littered china has refused to take part in the ukraine,

paste calling for the set to take place in switzerland next month, explaining that badging is conditions of being ignored. a p. m. title to the arrangement of the meeting still falls short of china's requirements, and the expectations of the international community is making it difficult for china to attend. relevant parties have been informed of china is considerations and concerns. we will continue to promote peace talks in our own way. stay in communication with all parties and work together to build the conditions for political settlement of the ukrainian crisis. this west government has invited more than a 160 countries to join. please take a pos to assess all the crating and conflict. china has insisted on inviting both opposing counsel. they may russia and ukraine with the coolest folded on death is on. most of his being refused to see to the table contributes at comstock told us the conference is simply a platform for ukraine to cement, into a national. suppose i'm see condemnation of russia. and right now it looks like the

so called piece um it, it just a one sided it for um, for you crate it or it does not make sense not to you by both side of the costly to a piece negotiation or there is no point. it's so far sending this white china has refused to attend because what's the point of not inviting russia to a to ending the conflict between russia and ukraine or what it looks like. this forum is intended for a platform for ukraine to gather pumping up for he took this international support and to. ready uh, maybe try to have something to raise condemnation of russia, and this is why russia was not invited to this white rock. china refused to attend . it's not serving the purpose to actually achieving piece, which is what's needed right now. for china has offered to back, has

a piece broke repeating brushing ukraine's. this was warmly received by the russian president fulton. well, what we know right now, this is not just a conflict between ukrainian russia. it's really a, a proxy word that's waged by nato against russia. using ukraine as the proxy and, you know, there could have been peace in march 2022 forest jonathan fluid to us to, to, to put a stop to it. and, you know, we now know the landscape does not make the call. it says, cursing, washington and brussels with an organization of the us justice system. those financing was come from see me, a republicans as they condemned a new york jerry, the finding donald trump guilty on stairs. a full felony counts. the former president of claims the entire case was ranked because there's never been anybody so conflicted as is that was far as the trial itself. it was very unfair.

we weren't allowed to allowed to use our election expert under any circumstances. you saw what happened to some of the witnesses that were on our side. they were literally crucified by this man. it's a rig. it was a rig trial. we wanted a venue change where we could have a fair trial. we didn't get it. we wanted a judge judge, we wanted to judge it wasn't conflicted, nothing ever happened to. they know it, but they were solution is salacious as they could be. and it had nothing to do with the case, but it had to do with politics. do you notice the timing? the timing was perfect. this case was that it was dropped by every agency. every governmental board, it was dropped by the highly respected southern district. didn't want to announce that was running for president. long time later,

they decided to revive this guys. that's plus live to new york on the corresponding caleb open. now caleb, good to see you. so we just had what donald trump himself thinks about the date, what's been the reaction days trial across america? so i thought a while we're here on 5th avenue in manhattan in front of trump tower, where there are hundreds, possibly thousands of people gather the bulk of whom are trump supporters. and they see this as a miscarriage of justice. now that the reaction to the trial from many people is to call this blatant pollute us ization of the us legal system. many are pointing out for example, that falsifying business records is generally a misdemeanor and not a felony. however, in this case, they made it a felony, and donald trump was convicted on $34.00 accounts of it. now, many are looking on and saying this is just blatant politicize zation of the us

legal system. this is not the way the law was intended to be carried out and they see this as an embarrassing moment for the united states. here's some of the reaction to donald trump's conviction. indeed, great damage was done today to the public's facing the american legal system. if a former president can be criminally convicted, or such a trivial matter motivated by politics rather than justice, then any one is at risk of a similar fate. first of all, my reaction is that the democratic party has completely destroyed our leg curl system. jack smith is criminalized, but used to be legitimate. we don't have the foggiest idea of what is legal or illegal anymore in our federal election. today is a shameful day in american history. democrats cheat as they can because the leader of the opposing party on ridiculous charges predicate on the testimony of a decent, bought convicted felon. this was a political exercise, not the legal one. it was

a nice ation of our justice system has been the whole michael, the bite and administration. this was a shame show trial. the kangaroo cold will never stand on appeal americans. this is better than a sitting us president. what the noise in our justice system against the political opponent all to win an election. now, it's also important to know that the charges stem from an alleged payment of a $130000.00 to porn stars, nor mcdaniels. it's alleged that parsimony there, calling it was paid to the former pornographic film star and exchange for her not saying things about the former president. now it's worth noting that uh that itself is not a crime. the crime would be what he was convicted of was falsifying business records . many of noted that paula jones was paid over $850000.00 by bill clinton. in the aftermath of law suits for allegations of sexual misconduct. and bill

clinton was never charged for that, and that was not considered a crime, but there are bigger legal questions about the case. for example, the jury was told they did not have to agree what crime donald trump had actually committed. they did not have to be unanimous on what crime the president had committed, but as long as they agreed he was guilty of something, their verdict would be considered unanimous. and that raises a lot of questions about how the judge carried out the trial and the instructions given to the jury. so here's what some legal experts had to say about how the trial was conducted. guilty on all counts. donald j trump, for 40 for president of the united states, was found guilty to warmer president donald trump is found guilty on all $34.00 criminal charges against him via jury found former president donald trump. guilty of all 34 counts and the historic new york hush money case. former us president donald trump has been found guilty on all $34.00 charges in his hash money trial.

here what we're doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony because remember, falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in new york. what makes it a felony is that you're concealing or committing another crime? and here the judge is telling them they don't enough to agree about what the crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony. what makes it a 4 year potential present penalty rather than a year or less. so the only reason they're still able to bring this case is because it's a felony, allegedly, and yet now the judge is saying, you know, you don't have to agree on what the felony is of the now people are also raising questions about why the judge did not provide the jurors with copies of their instructions while they deliberated and determined that donald trump was guilty, they were, instead told they could ask the judge to read the instructions again. but they were

not given written copies of the instructions about what they were intended to do, and how they were contented to rule on the case. and that is something that legal scholars also have questions about, here's what some prominent legal voice is that about the jury instructions issue. this is insanity. i've tried many jury trials in my day. you give jurors paper instructions every time. how are 12 jurors supposed to remember the elements and necessary for each of the $34.00 felony counts? this is an elicit which fund prosecution. now at this point, people are wondering what this means for the upcoming us presidential election. donald trump is the presumed anomaly of the republican party, but the question is, will he be able to run a presidential campaign? his sentence thing is that for july 11th, he could receive up to 4 years for each count that he is convicted of up to a 136 years in prison for

a falsifying business records filing paperwork incorrectly. people are looking at this case and saying, what comes next? will donald trump be able to debate, joe? but will he be able to travel on the campaign trail? will he be in house arrest for his campaign? or will he possibly end up doing much of his campaigning from prison? now people are wondering what could happen next. this is certainly unprecedented in american politics. never has a former president of the united states been convicted of a felony. now at the same time, people are looking at this and pointing out that there is no constitutional disqualifier for convicted felons to run president. donald trump still has every right to run for president, despite being convicted of a felony in many states. felons cannot vote in the united states, but there is no restriction on convicted felons running for the presidency. so at this point, a lot of questions are in the air in light of this conviction,

we'll have to see how this plays out, the election is set to take place november 5th. it will certainly be an interesting election in american history. absolutely. okay. the many things to bring is up to speed, the sun and new will correspond and kind of open that with the license. thank you. now if it's a window where the 7th and final phase as low, think of the general election is scheduled for san jose. the results will be the cloud on june, the 4th we've been hearing from many voters across the world's most populous country, including a 100 year old independence, despite the who also took pos in india is 1st post colonial elections. i of the

new do do many things here, but really the big a big thing we could do 3 patients present or most or that, or is it printing that it or do they can here are just so many languages. so many so many damaged cities. they never be able to predicted factors extra data for a different number would be pretty good as it was this close to, to should be good to how many people did due to flight before that these a 2 to a few would to do with some properties up to that,

to everybody for chip or to very but i can think of the table and move it, but he would like to move the name of the to this i just decided the what is your day to day that you freedom body. so it a bed to hit i per decade, drug david, right? because of the speeding because i was

a 3 to 10 may mean became more picking up in images of freedom. women 10 is 230 and 15 when they vaporizer was injured by dr. sort of the know the most you fee to bring them to who dream content so you can get them to renew but not look for the can you have to pay for a new copy or print the print of all the

money. thanks for your company. on the international is always appreciated that so for me, for now, my quantity to know now will be here with the latest news on the top of the out, the russian states never as tight as i'm one of the most sense communities. so i'll send some of the same assistance to bob must be the one else calls question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on the russians, putting s r t sports net,

keeping our video agency roughly all the band on youtube tv services, for what question did you say even twist, which is the so many people question. the name was true, provocative. collateral or murder instead of collateral damage and the information . but as a former marine company commander, i knew enough for baltimore law, the launch of war to an owner. that was in fact, or there is no video of more market in history in the public domain. there is no video type that shows how a country like united states has wage war.