the, the that was the most massive 10 round the tech with us attack themselves on the core. i mean bridge with a flight time of less than 2 minutes total. the missiles were struck down. russia intercepts us slew of us made mist styles over the crime in bridge the coming of the western drum beats increases in favor of a loading key of the strike deep into russian territory. also ahead we will continue to promote peace talks in our own way. stay in communication with all parties and work together to build the conditions for political settlement of the ukrainian crisis. china refuses to participate in a so called peace conference for ukraine to, to take place in switzerland next month,

stating that all sides of the conflict must be involved on pointing on. russia. probably been flushed with an ice ation of the american justice system. that's how the u. s. high speaker has described the guilty verdict, how they've done against donald trump, for a falsifying business records the across the world around the club. this is archie. you hello and welcome to the news our a huge ukrainian salvo of us supply ms. silas targeting the crime in bridge has been intercepted by russian forces that's according to moscow's defense minister. instead of attempts to strikes a 1000000000 infrastructure shows the key as western sponsors are sticking to escalate the war to put your lease to move forward. i would like to report that just on wednesday, that was the most massive 10 round attack with us attack them's missed solves. on

the core, i mean bridge with a flight time of less than 2 minutes old of the missiles was shot down, deprived of the opportunity to seize the initiative on the battlefield. the key, every game continues to demonstrate to his western responses, its ability to damage the russian federation by striking civilian infrastructure. the west is urgently pumping weapons into cranes transmitting intelligence training ukrainian service meant recruiting must embrace. in this vein, russia is continuing its special military operation and only its goals will certainly be achieved as a result of all actions and important areas in me. call co region. the enemy has retreated by 8 to 9 kilometers this month. a line $28.00 supplements have been liberated in total, 880 square kilometers of territories have come under the control of the russian army this year. the russian armed forces systematically reducing the combat potential of the crating own forces in may the enemy last mold them 35000 service men and 2700 units of various weapons among them and 2 $190.00 tanks and almost

combat vehicles, including full abrams, $711.12 bradley's research. well, it's very interesting context is very interesting as well as this was made at the c s t o, which is the collective security. it's an organization which is like natal excess wear brushes allies, if you like. i get together and discuss the security situation. last week we had president bruce and also in bell rush. and so this is also interesting where this was said, it comes in a context where the west is almost obsessed in the media. with this idea of permission for weapons that our supply to going to the reality. and what we know is that the ukraine has been striking on the russian territory worship proper. not the new territories for the last 2 years, basically on and off. so this whole a fun to see in the west that, you know, we'll, we won't, we allow these weapons to be used on the long list, the country, somebody's sending a will be, won't read this. it's been kind of dispelled in some respect by uh,

dmitri past golf. a marie is a har of a to very senior people in the political world here in motion. some of this is what they have to say to them to them in general, american made weapons are already being used and attempted strikes on russian territory. but of course, it is more than eloquent evidence of the extent of the united states involvement in this conflict. there is also an absolute build up of pro war sentiment in the you. they are deliberately full mentoring, pre more hysteria. but all of this, of course, can not good have a very negative impact on the overall situation. the tensions continue to escalate to the quote. it was all vs that the nato members were lying and putting up a smoke screen making up a story that they had not yet decided whether or not to allow the key of regime to launch strikes using western weapons on russian territory. in the same way they mislead those, they trying to drag to the conference in switzerland by telling tales about its peaceful settlement,

classic native style manipulation. and so the message coming off of russia is, this is also some sort of political stay as a, from the west. i'm just wondering, just how capable ukraine actually is on it. so, you know, without nature, i suppose. well, the reality is from a strategic point of view, from an analysis point to view your train is now exceptionally reliant on western a financial aid. the economic aid of course, military item, you remember, joseph morrell, not so long ago, suggested that it would take 2 weeks to end the war from the europe in america stuff floating it with weapons in cash. and this is the reality, of course you printing doesn't manufacture any of these long range weapons. it doesn't have any capacity to target them. and many other analysts have written about this. this is a key hollow the country at this stage regarding the ability to wage this for a very interesting lot him approved themself has gone into great detail lining the reality of what's happening with the long range strikes from you find that it's not

a huge pain doing it essentially that they have know what satellite information they have, no targeting. and that it requires specialists from britain, germany, france to operate the systems that the target them. that's all the listen to what you have to say to elizabeth, which nettles or bunch with this new high precision. long range weapons cannot be launched without using space recognizance. in addition, the final target choice and the so called flight mission, but it can only be made by highly qualified specialist is based on this technical intelligence doing who is doing this. this is done by those who produce and allegedly supply the systems to ukraine. the scanning does happen without the participation of ukrainian military personnel and other systems are also being prepared on the basis of space exploration and are automatically brought to the appropriate calculations. does this task is being prepared not by ukrainian service men, but by representatives of nato countries. but these representatives of nato countries,

especially in europe, they should generally be aware of what they are playing with somebody. they should remember that this is of them as a rule est with a small territories, and a very dense population when you much to and this is a fact that they should keep in mind before talking about striking deep into the russian territory, has to be sure this is a serious matter, and we are of course, watching it very carefully get through. it's a new brain's going us. so it seems like it's a case of say, one thing do another for many of these western countries, which makes it a little curious when we see these power is giving a so called official node to k of to attack russia with mesa website. and so what, what can you tell us on this? well, it, it seems, there seems to be a pile of, of getting on board. now, as you know, as ukraine's more goes from bad to worse, it started with the counter offensive, which were told is gonna be a huge success. all the game change the leverage the challenge years. uh, you know, it's now it's the 16th, all of which available, all of which have been destroyed by russia. but in the background to this, there's

a reality as well, where there's o at 1st k, you know, the worst is kind of actually the 1st what the west ascending. and that's been born out again and again from the men's good courts to negotiating to is stumbled to when they had a deal done 3 weeks after the start of the s. m. o. zelinski within pulled away from the table by bar as johnson. and of course, washington was body involved in the 2. we've also now had on 3 blinking coming out and suggesting that it's ok to strike russia beyond russia's borders with ukraine, with weapon supplies to ukraine. the trouble is over the past few weeks, ukraine came to us and asked for the authorization to use weapons that were providing to defend against this aggression, including against the russian forces that are massing on the russian side of the border and then attacking into ukraine and that went right to the president and as you've heard, he's approved use of our weapons for that. for that purpose, i'm going forward. those continue to do what we've been doing,

which is as necessary, adapt and adjust. and that, as i said, has been a hallmark of our engagement. it will continue to be. so there's a kind of us gets a free and here, and it kinda underlines the point that doesn't need to be a strategy in the west. on this forward motion, the only forward motion to west seems to have now regarding ukraine after the election year, no president to the united states wants to lose a war. how can us down to point though, in the run up to the election? a lot of at the very focus you are paying careers are still invested in this war and ukraine, you know, the defeat of russia underlined this economy. sometimes all these things, which i've turned out to be completely on true. yet, as we see this escalation occurring, the leaders of big you put your pancreas power for your fee for the poland, fonts, and jeremy continue on message with the escalation. that's the new invest exact, and although we're staying exactly within the same framework,

we think that we should allow them to neutralize the military sites from which the missiles are fired. and basically, the military sites from which you crane is attacked within the several countries, including germany, have reached clear agreements with ukraine on the use of western weapons. such a defensive struggle is not limited to one's own national territory, but can of course, also be extended to the aggressive national territory through bolts couple don't get them because we always weapons that we're transferring to ukraine to not have any use restrictions. ingredients can fight the way they want, and i think this is a very, very important aspect of this donation. so, it all seems to demonstrate one thing. uh, when you look at this objectively that, you know, you find isn't a sovereign state anymore. it's not a southern state economically, it's not a sovereign state military. it seems that somebody else is deciding when you create a tax, one of the tax with just ask permission to whether it can attack real. she'll be on this boards that doesn't suggest the sovereign state. it's now go over into the lead boy of mine who is a defacto dictator. see how no electro,

a man's aid on president vladimir putin had to point out the intricacies of the ukrainian constitution. a few days back and pointing out that only the government now has a right to rule. as lensky has no right whatsoever. so it seems to be getting more more kilometers. and it seems the only people who actually know what's going on and ukraine or the russians. okay, we'll get some of the live reaction that's in just moments on the program. but 1st, i just want to show you this a 2 day, informal meeting of nature, foreign ministers at rocks, office 5 in prague. officials helping discussing softening restrictions on keep using western arms to strike internationally recognized russian territory. the hungarian foreign minister stays the alliance has moved closer than ever to physically entering the company. you know, it's going to you for yeah, i mean, we think that with all these proposals and all these ideas and data will always taking you in even greater step in the direction of entering this war. 2 and

a half years ago, we decided together that natal can not be a part of this one that is not allowed to have a direct confrontation between nato and russia. well now and then it was getting closer and closer to direct confrontation, not only politically, but also physically. well, that's across to international lawyer and political consultant are no do, will a for his take on that, you're most welcome to the program. so ukraine has admitted that they'd use us supplied a talk, ends, miss silas, to strike the cry, me and bridge, which key have called a legitimate military target. how significant is all that as well, to be sure, it's uh, nothing new. uh, 1st of all, i mean, the ukraine has never really abided by any kind of laws of war and as far as preserving a civilian infrastructure. so this one supplies any one here in the, as far as the use of long range missiles. and as i came, this is the only thing that god blessed essentially. and to the extent they need to

provide a facade of, uh, putting up the flight. uh, the, you know, the long range of weaponry. uh, of course, using intelligence uh, from the western sponsors. uh seems to be the only uh, the only car they have left of chip has left and the washington pulled up. motto has left uh, in order to try to go the russians into uh, you know, uh, showing you a more subdued approach to the big progress that we've been registering the last few weeks and mostly on the kind of golf area. so there's this notion that somehow they can keep a, you know, a gorgine gording the bad, and that this won't lead to consequences, which i think is a major miscalculation on their part. let me just delve into some of the points you raise there. those at tech games ms. silas were recently delivered to ukraine from the us. to what extent do a tax on sites like the claim? me in bridge?

mick washington complicit. what so, but for uh, situation here. uh, but for american, uh uh, targeting database, you know, obviously there will not be the possibility for the ukrainian quotes out of court to proceed with such a tax. uh, but for the uh, technical assistance seeing uh, calibration, again those operation would not be possible. and, but for the american political, uh, and the european uh, endorsement of such course of action. again, we would not be having this conversation. so everything is closely interlink, intern meshed, and everyone on as far as on the data, or you throughout ukraine side is coordinating at the political, diplomatic, and military level. so the question is now the responses that president put in previously said that such strikes can not be carried out with direct western

involvement. what is the response? how does must go off in this regard with what's happening? well, most go us to somehow be the, the adult in the room for, you know, and assuming that more for everyone. uh, the assumption is that we're getting was completely responsible for the, for the leaders in the west. uh, for whatever reason. they decided that uh they can, they can keep escalating and without any kind of adverse effect in your introduction. and obviously you mentioned the us presidential election schedule. and then the cool idea that it would be a disaster for the incumbent administration. where the uh, i've gotten just in a sequence to be repeated on western media. but i think again, there's way more than that. so many interest again in, in, in ukraine. and it's, there's an ideological silence to the analysis that want us to take into account.

then your colleagues are a group that does not know how to reverse the approval of the old year. they keep bumping down in the face of failure. and it almost becomes irrational in essence. so this is where we get into very dangerous territory. but make no mistake about it . most course, perfectly a commitment of what's going on in terms of the equipment that's being shipped into ukraine, the movement of troops. and to the extent that get the actionable intelligence, they will move on it and eradicate any kind of, uh, type in the i wanna mention as well, i guess your views on what is happening in europe. chestler lat schultz has given kids permission to use german supplied weapons to hit targets inside internationally recognize russian territory. how serious open escalation is not as well the whites out of 40 to be sure. and we know that the macro now is preparing

a major announcement to go inside on the 80th $79.00, sunday virtually of the allies landing in normandy. so everything is being private it's. it's almost like a hollywood. we also, and we're sleep walking to a possible disaster. if we're not cautious here. you mentioned russia should act or what are we thinking as the adult in, in the room. we have heard quite direct language though, from some russian officials saying that a stronger show of force could be an option such as at new killer tests, is that something you think is being discussed of the highest level. what of course, those discussions are being held back to be sure this is really the last resort option and no one's wants to even think about you're using those weapons. those weapons can only be of use if we never get. the problem is the last 30 years also

seems to passing away of a generation of leaders, especially in the west. we understood what, what was all about and the cost this conflict from the respective countries. one to steward has only a 40 years ago, you know, without internet even being there. that's not who clear. uh, weapons meant essentially the end of life on this, as we know it's, uh now we're dealing with a bunch of people largest managers. we've been placed and not elected for safe keeping in mind that the accommodations are consensus of them. a accessing power of even being somewhat dubious. and those people seem to be completely unaware of all those. uh uh, those elements historical, uh, uh, jurisprudence and uh, we can only look at the situation with a lot of full body because it's all about the short term. it's all about getting

that bump in the pool. that's all about getting the media. the points that's required at any given moment. and obviously we are dealing with and then lots context here in which those kind of politic king techniques are completely uh, required and inadequate. and you mentioned about statesmen, all 2 years gone by something else i recall you will too. it is in those previous days piece was talked about, you know, that was at the forefront of discussions. no, it appears. i can't remember the last time somebody mentioned it among western leads by the need at 4 piece instead of spin escalation, it's a been run thing off. it's been a by more weapons. you've got the upcoming switched for them on the ukraine conflict happening at next month in june, rush to say that watson,

even invited the prospects do not look good here. now the prospect does not look good because as you said, you know, we are now dealing with people in position of policy making as far as point policy is concerned. why more? uh, commission on a long side ideological myers, we don't have any really store one year old. we used to pull patio conservative in terms of by moving about in foreign policy around. so the brands call croft and the gems becker. the third's are gone. and we're left because the victoria newton and assignment of powers. and this is a very dangerous situation to be sure. thank you so much for your time on your thoughts on this top notch analysis from international lawyer on schuman right, specialist or no, do valley. no, china, as we just mentioned, has refused to take part in a peace conference on the ukraine conflict due to take place in switzerland next month. your spacings explanation for say no. p m hyphen,

the arrangement of the meeting still falls short of china is requirements and the expectations of the international community is making it difficult for china to attend. relevant parties have been informed of try those considerations and concerns. we will continue to promote peace talks in our own way. stay in communication with all parties and work together to build the conditions for political settlement of the cranium crisis to well, that's what the government has invited more than a $160.00 countries to jointly seek a path to end the conflict. china has insisted on inviting both the opposing camps, namely russia and ukraine, but that's cool, has fallen on deaf ears as most school has been, refused the seat of the table, but said they may not go. in any case, our t contributor carl job believes the conference is simply a platform for ukraine to cement international support on say, combination impression. that means right now it looks like the so called the summit

. it's just a one sided it for um, for you crate. it or it does not make sense, not to you by both sides of the conflict to a peace negotiation, or is it? there is no point it's, it's a far sending. this is why china has refused to attend, because what's the point of not inviting russia to a to ending the conflict between russia and ukraine or the what it looks like. this forum is intended for platform for ukraine to gather pumping up for he took this international support and too. ready maybe try to have something to raise condemnation of russia, because this is why russia was not invited this wide rock china refused to attend. it's not serving the purpose to actually achieving piece, which is what's needed right now. for china has offered 2 factors, a piece broke between russia and ukraine. this was warmly received by the russian

president clinton. well, what we know right now, this is not just the conflict between ukrainian russia, it's really a, a proxy war, this wage by nato, against russia. using ukraine as the proxy and, you know, there could have been peace in march 2022 forest johnson glued to us to, to, to put a stop to it. and, you know, we now know the landscape does not make the call. it says cursing, washington and brussels with a nice ation of the us justice system. the words of senior republicans in response to the shop guilty verdict done to donald trump and the new york court on thursday . the parties, presumptive presidential normally was convicted of falsifying business records, that mr. trump ends the entire case was rig from the off cuz there's never been anybody so conflicted. this is as far as the trial itself,

it was very unfair. we weren't allowed to allowed to use our election expert under any circumstances. you saw what happened to some of the witnesses that were on our side. they were literally crucified by this man. it's a rig. it was a rig trial. we wanted a venue change where we could have a fair trial. we didn't get it. we wanted a judge judge, we wanted to judge it wasn't conflicted, nothing ever happened. did they know it? but they were solution is salacious as they could be. and it had nothing to do with the case, but it had to do with politics. do you notice the timing? the timing was perfect. this case was dead. it was dropped by every agency. every governmental board, it was dropped by the highly respected southern district. they want to announce that was running for president long time later,

they decided to revive this guys. that's how the american system of justice works. as reckless is dangerous. it's irresponsible for anyone to say this is greg, just because they don't like the verdict. our justice system is adored for nearly 250 years and it really is the cornerstone of america our justice system. for while we're here on 5th avenue in manhattan in front of trump tower, where there are hundreds, possibly thousands of people gather the bulk of whom are trump supporters. and they see this as a miscarriage of justice. now that the reaction of the trial from many people is to call this blatant pollute us ization of the us legal system. many are pointing out for example, that falsifying business records is generally a misdemeanor and not a felony. however, in this case, they made it

a felony and donald trump was convicted on 34 accounts, all that. here's some of the reaction to donald trump's conviction. indeed, great damage was done today to the public's face in the american legal system. if a former president can be criminal, convicted, or such a trivial matter motivated by politics rather than justice, then any one is at risk of a similar fate. today is a shameful day in american history. democrats cheat as they can visit the leads of the opposing party on ridiculous charges predicated on the testimony of ladies bogged convicted felon. this was a political exercise, not the legal one, the what but nice ation of our justice system has been the whole mike of a bite and administration. this was a sham show trial. the kangaroo, cool, cool, never stand on appeal. americans deserve better than a sitting us president. what the noise thing our justice system against the political opponent will to win an election. now it's also important to know that the charges stem from an alleged payment of a $130000.00 to porn stars,

nor mcdaniels. it's alleged that parsimony there, calling it was paid to the former pornographic film star and exchange for her not saying things about the former president. now it's worth noting that uh that itself is not a crime. the crime would be what he was convicted of was falsifying business records . many of noted that paula jones was paid over $850000.00 by bill clinton. in the aftermath of law suits for allegations of sexual misconduct. and bill clinton was never charged for that, and that was not considered a crime, but there are bigger legal questions about the case. for example, the jury was told they did not have to agree what crime donald trump had actually committed. uh, they did not have to be unanimous on what crime the president had committed, but as long as they agreed he was guilty of something, their verdict would be considered unanimous. and that raises

a lot of questions about how the judge carried out the trial and the instructions given to the jurors guilty on all counts. donald trump is found guilty on all $34.00 criminal charges. donald trump has been found guilty on all $34.00 charges and his hash money trial. here, what we're doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony because remember, falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in new york. what makes it a felony is that you're concealing or committing another crime? and here the judge is telling them they don't have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony. what makes it a 4 year potential present penalty rather than a year or less? so the only reason they're still able to bring this case is because it's a felony, allegedly and yet now the judge's saying, you know, you don't have to agree on what the felony is. people are also raising questions about why the judge did not provide the jurors with copies of their instructions.

while they deliberated and determined that donald trump was guilty, they were instead told they could ask the judge to read the instructions again. but they were not given written copies of the instructions about what they were intended to do, and how they were contented to rule on the case. and that is something that legal scholars also have. questions about this is insanity. i've tried many jury trials in my day. you give jurors paper instructions every time. how are 12 jurors suppose to remember the elements necessary for each of the $34.00 felony counts? this is an elicit which one to prosecution. now at this point, people are wondering what this means for the upcoming us presidential election. donald trump is the presumed domini of the republican party. but the question is, will he be able to run a presidential campaign? his sentencing is set for july 11. he could receive up to 4 years for each count

that he is convicted of up to a 136 years in prison for falsifying business records, filing paper work incorrectly. people are looking at this case and saying, what comes next. this is certainly unprecedented in american politics. never has a former president of the united states been convicted of a felony. well, we also spoke with a former professor in the criminal justice school of the city university of new york. down the show is of the view, donald trump, trial is nothing but political persecution. the clearest less and we can do arrive from this political gossip in this political trump stormy daniel soap opera . this played out over a few years now is that the democrats are so weak. they can't even be a truck with a straight up election. so their strategy, their plan b if you will. there's been.