their illusions going underground can the if they can do this to me, they can do this to anyone bad. we have president and a group of fascist. i don't want to do anything about donald trump claim is this court conviction was personnel pastry, quite preston, binding in an effort to discover his re election that we get reaction from the grounds. punch is crazy. you know that at all, we're always looking at it saying, what's going on over there in america, the greatest country in the world. we're going to have a feller possibly you have a fall on it does. is it just a system stuff with other people in jail? thousands take to the streets. i'm hungry where it cools, but no, no, i heard loud and clear and a protest over nature's involvement in ukrainian conflict. the

election 0 but in south africa and 99 percent of the vote content, the applicant, national co rest, stands to lose its majority in parliament. for the 1st time in the t e is the, this is of the international you watching the news. so i thank you for tuning in donald trump claims that his court conviction this week in new york was a direct attempt to buy precedent bite and poor p. though his run at the white house, trump was fine due to full supplying business records. and the so called cash money trial, he says the entire case was raked. if they can do this to me, they can do this to anyone. and we have a president and a group of fascist, don't want to do anything about it. it's a rig. it was a rig trial. we wanted

a venue change where we could have a fair trial. we didn't get it. we wanted a judge change, we wanted a judge, it wasn't conflicted. you saw what happened to some of the witnesses that were on our side. they were literally crucified by this man who looks like an angel, but he's really a devil. that's how the american system of justice works. as breakfast is dangerous. it's irresponsible for anyone to say this is greg, just because they don't like the verdict. well, we're here on 5th avenue in manhattan in front of trump tower, where there are hundreds, possibly thousands of people gather the bulk of whom are trump supporters, and they see this as a miscarriage of justice. now that the reaction to the trial from many people is to call this blatant pollute us ization of the us legal system. many are pointing out

for example, that falsifying business records is generally a misdemeanor and not a felony. however, in this case, they made it a felony and donald trump was convicted on $34.00 accounts of it. here's some of the reaction to donald trump's conviction. indeed, great damage was done today to the public's facing the american legal system. if a former president can be criminal, convicted, or such a trivial matter motivated by politics rather than justice, then any one is at risk of a similar fate. today is a shameful day in american history. democrats cheat as they can visit the legion of the opposing party on ridiculous charges predicated on the testimony of a this bought convicted felon. this was a political exercise, not the legal one, the what but nice ation of our justice system has been the whole mike of a bite and administration. this was a shame show trial. the kangaroo, cool, cool, never stand on appeal americans. this is better than a sitting us president, what the noise thing our justice system against the political opponent will to win

an election. now it's also important to know that the charges stem from an alleged payments of a $130000.00 to porn stars, nor mcdaniels. it's alleged that parsimony there, calling it was paid to the former pornographic film star and exchange for her not saying things about the former president. now it's worth noting that uh that itself is not a crime. the crime would be what he was convicted of was falsifying business records . many of noted that paula jones was paid over $850000.00 by bill clinton. in the aftermath of law suits for allegations of sexual misconduct. and bill clinton was never charged for that, and that was not considered a crime, but there are bigger legal questions about the case. for example, the jury was told they did not have to agree what crime donald trump had actually committed. uh, they did not have to be unanimous on what crime the president had committed,

but as long as they agreed he was guilty of something, their verdict would be considered unanimous. and that raises a lot of questions about how the judge carried out the trial in the instructions given to the jurors. donald trump has been found guilty on all $34.00 charges and his has won a trial. and here the judge is telling them they don't have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony. people are also raising questions about why the judge did not prove via the jurors with copies of their instructions. while they deliberated and determined that donald trump was guilty, they were instead told they could ask the judge to read the instructions again. but they were not given written copies of the instructions about what they were intended to do, and how they were contented to rule on the case. and that is something that legal scholars also have. questions about this is insanity. i've tried many jury trials in my day. you give jurors paper instructions every time. how are 12 jurors

supposed to remember the elements and necessary for each of the $34.00 felony counts? this is an elicit which one to prosecution. now at this point, people are wondering what this means for the upcoming us presidential election. donald trump is the presumed domini of the republican party. but the question is, will he be able to run a presidential campaign? his sentence thing is that for july 11th, this is certainly unprecedented in american politics. never as a former president of the united states been convicted of a felony when we took this theory to the streets of new york to gauge her reaction to trumps conviction. what that might mean for his attempt to get back behind the desk in the oval office. that means honest money. honest. madison's honest media, honest selections, honest energy, honest education. now i don't know what they're thinking all over the world, but they're thinking we have a look for a country. it's crazy. you know,

that whole world is looking at us saying, what's going on over there in america, the greatest country in the world. and, you know, not too happy with it, you know, i mean, how dare them take a president and, and do this to my next president. i would hope people who are paying attention realize that a felony kind of votes and most this felons gone vote. are we have a cell or possibly have a felon? it does, is it just a system stuff with other people in jail on, on the, on the door, the book on board when a fellow is in charge of the system, it makes no sense. well, as to miles says it will but take a when it's on to biden's face with the white task press briefing, said little slots about his thoughts on his bibles conviction. mister president, can you tell us? or donald trump prefers himself as a political prisoner and blame you directly. what's your response to that, sir?

yeah, i spoke with the legal analyst, foreman, new jersey, superior court judge, andrew, nicola tyler, he said the new york state statute didn't demand that you raise agreement on what the underlying crime was for trump's case, which he says is a violation of the federal constitution. the president biden had nothing to do with this case. there is no evidence to support that allegation at all. you know, in america, we have a 50 states as well as the federal system. and the state prosecutorial apparatus is independent of the federal system. the decisions as to who the states prosecute and how they prosecute them, and what they charge them with has nothing to do with the president or the federal government. but this prosecution was for a very bizarre crime that only exists in the state of new york. it doesn't exist

in any of the other 49 states. the defense should also have challenged the constitutionality of the statute. that is, is this state statute, this new york state statute a violation of the federal constitution? now here's how that would work, and this is what they will try to do on appeal. the federal constitution requires that when the government prosecute you in federal or in state court, you're entitled to know what you're charged with. and you're entitled to know the evidence against you, and you can only be convicted if the jury agrees unanimously on all the elements of all the charges. but in this case, the statute permits the jurors to disagree on what the underlying crime was. but because the statute does not require the jurors to agree on what the underlying crime was or even to tell the judge or the defendant,

what the underlying crime was. it is probably defective under the american constitution that's trumps. best argument in my view. so when he woke up friday morning and his wife said, well, what, what were you convicted of yesterday? probably said, i don't know. and he doesn't know when the judge does it know of. and i don't know . those are as follow doesn't watch it scrupulously for a living. don't know. because this unique, new york statute does not require the jury to tell the judge what the underlying crime was. it just requires that the 12 agree that there was some underlying crime is. so the faulty or is not with the judge. the fault here is with the statute, with the legislation enacted by the legislature of the state of new york. and when was the statute and acted a 125 years ago. that's how old the statute is. and very,

very few people, fewer than 10 years that it'd be, wouldn't have been prosecuted under this statute. in a 125 years. republicans slamming the verdict. we've had mike johnson saying this was on fact on others cooling this, a weapon noise ation to the us justice system. do you think that that's a fast statement? i think that of donald trump's name were donald jones. he would never have been prosecuted. do i think he was prosecuted because he was donald trump? yes, i do. very briefly. so ask you a question about this 30 full charges because my understanding is but they're not. so the full crimes to say it is one crime, but donald trump was being charged for each document referred to the payment, allegedly made to store mcdaniels. do think that was written electrical prosecution

rather than shrinking is one case us. all right, that's a very good question. i think it was a politically written indictment. i mean charging somebody with 34 crimes, even though it's the same thing titled 34 pieces of paper rather than with one crime sounds so much worse. so yes, they could have written the indictment in a way that didn't sound as bad as it is. i agree with you on that, charlotte, we will reset the capital of hungry now with thousands of demonstrators is taken to the streets to purchase nature's involvement in the ukrainian conflict. no to rule. that's the clear message that was hurting through the past during certain names. peace march, the crowds with baron supposed to victor opens policies and also opposing nature, his actions, which they leave off for voting. a white one in your department is to address the

massive, suggesting demands repeated calling the new jo, top the people's interest in mind. my phone phone, decry and quotes every day. we are told about the hundreds of billions of bureaus needed for ukraine. the need to deploy nucular weapons in the middle of europe to enlist our sons in a for an army, a natal mission, a new crane, and european military units and ukraine. we're not going to let our children and our knowledge be transported to the ukranian front. they don't consider themselves responsible for anything. they don't listen to anyone. they step over you. they don't care about you or your life. they don't care about your family, the house you worked for, or the future you work for every day. any we spoke with george some really senior research fellow at the global policy institute. she says the old people across europe do not share nato's narrative. what's very interesting is that

the public opinion in hungary is very much opposed to getting involved in the school. but in fact, that isn't very different from public opinion in most of europe. what's different about hungary is that it's a lead by a political leader who explicitly says that hungary will take no cost whatsoever in anything to do with this war. and, and that is something you need because that, you know, you, you, you don't hear that in front. you don't hear that. additionally, you don't have that in germany. owner is the one place. and of course you heard that in the silvan kid with a robot fits, so was now recovering. so that's what's really the extraordinary that here we have a political lead, the leader of the you, a big a who's in the, uh, in nato would say, absolutely no we,

we cannot get ourselves into this. or if it more over to south africa now, where the african national congress posted on track to lose its majority in parliament for the 1st time. for 13 years. this is, according to the preliminary results, the well with over 99 percent of the pilots come to the a and c has secured around 40 percent of the vote and that is quite a drop from 2019 when it got 57 percent without the majority empowerment in seeing we'll of course have to form a coalition government with other policies to pass any legislation. meanwhile, south africa's electoral commission says it won't rush through the final stages can . thanks. i evidently you, you are aware that the correlation process is i mean indeed

nearing completion as you know, and you can see from the lead up bought at the process is over 9 to 9 percent best part of finalizing the results management process. the commission wishes to show this nation and everyone else that is following the elections. indeed that we've continued to place priorities on the finalization of this results in a tron spot and, and or lead man, we're not going to rush, we're not going to look anything. we are going to walk as we look at every area of the work that is before us. so that's the kind of aging to set to define election results announcement with counting off the national votes. now over 9 to 9 percent with the i u c's, i'm not to to announce the final results today is dealing with objections from

several political parties. the commission is processing the objections and says it will release results once they've been addressed. now because the agency standing at just over 40 percent off the national vote losing its majority, the policy will be forced to form a coalition government back to the democratic allies is around 21 percent of the vote of the newly formed m. k party was 3rd, which is over 14 percent off the vote. in the 1st election, it is ever contested. the economy freedom fights is, was full and they are standing on just over 9 percent of the vote and more than 50 parties contested the eviction. many of them winning time uses, but the 3 main opposition parties that i've just mentioned appear to be the most obvious for the amc to approach when it comes to a co listen. so far. we've heard the d a need a john dnas of the saying he's party is open to discussions with the see even if,

if i need to do this, my name or the i made it clear that if there was a part to that it wouldn't mind working with is the in see, and just yesterday the empty part to say to one must be a key, couldn't this is for any agreement, was it present the process is removed as in see need us, but they haven't really said anything much on coalition at this point. but the city opposition parties have a combined share that is bigger than the agency, which will definitely make things up a task when it comes to the elections of a president. or even if we can't offer a cabinet because the prison is elected in parliament after the national votes resolved, to renounce that it has been almost a procedure over the last. the 3 digits with the easy to use it so much are a to, to lift. it's um, president of the country, but switching at just over 40 percent off the vote. so this you may not be so simple. the reaction is a bit of a mixed bag at this point. so i'm calling for a recount of the ballots costs and wednesdays and licks is claiming that the

process is being read. and as a saying, the time for talking has come to an end eventually. and as a society, they need action in change. and that's why they voted the how they voted in these the next is, but it's pretty much a divided society at this point to have a listen to this that he didn't vote say because of all of the people before. and there were some set almost 40 because there's no twos 5, which is what different apply to whole 40 is going to change. uh, the people didn't follow. hopefully you're going to come down and you're going to have a new but it's a guided by its own seat. then i'm in the pa to quite nice. don't be 18. his foot wednesdays caught up to the over 2 quarter inch in savings. the angel crab, the as i've had some sort of a secure vehicle come through by expect to see a lot of change cuz like the budget government housing bit agree that building the 1st thought. so they gave us a, the thing is that the legs advance so much advantage do now. so that's because the chaise door and open question. it has been an historical election. would he start

a resolve that puts of africa on a huge political pause for the 1st time since the end of a pop chase 30 years ago? let's had to go so now with this situation in the sense of the only place is becoming moved on every day. we've now had the commission, a general of the united nations relief and works agency confirming that it's organization has all but still fits activities in rafa. despite that though, he says the organization is committed to continue assisting communities more than 1000000 people most display several times forced to flee once again in search of safety that they never find. all of our 36 u. n. r w a shelters in rafa are empty. now this is where people seek shelter in should be protective, are all times under the un flag u n. r

w a had to stop health and other critical services. in rafa we are however, committed to stay and deliver for the communities. for the reason to find say, fire was there any forces in rafa and the closure of important crossing points for humanitarian aid has left to move in a 1000000 civilians in a desperate situation over 2000 a trucks waiting. only egyptian side of the board that have seen an able to cross compounding the crisis. matthew hollingsworth, the will food program director for the palestinian territories. described the current situation. the sounds, the smells, and the everyday life. i'm a thrift and apocalyptic people. sleep to the sounds and bowman, they speak to the sounds of drones. they sleep to the sounds of wool as now times roll into pos, a central rafa,

which is early kilometers away. and the ways to save yourselves rafa is still closed as opposed to crossing. wilford program base series and wrap the eval flows down for the last few and, and constant supplies being impossible as well, has not confirmed that it's forces are expanding gland operations. in rafa, this flies in the face of international condemnation in the old is the store for killing of civilians in its campaign, in the southern gauze and city. despite previous claims that these ro will conduct only limited to operations back almost units was supposed to do in central rafa for the 1st time since the end of the city. early this month, we've been speaking on the phone with jr and list of chrome, also tati for the latest developments. the size and indications, including the number of people because the number of neighborhood fabricate the

location of those neighborhoods are in the case of, of the fact that the, this opener's and is a full scale for this entire thing. the entirety of rough with an objective of control into the whole area. the number of people in the quality of target, the location of the different target, feed them on the east, or the west, or the south, or the north of rough or our own. in the case of or they all for 30 that there's at least the person is way of doing a full scale of others in what objective of control in the whole area problem, right? it's not only different identity, a front door to door sonata every single corner over there is only different sources have been underlining the fact that once 3 d months or so, days are the government is basically what the authors or the citizens they have been testify and they have been using this as of, as the weapons being just marketing smoking from the front border as a pretext to continue the production. they have now a now since they have already fully controlled for that insightful door. and they said by that they are preventing the smuggling of dual funds into gaza. so far,

they are preferred to continue with the 5 even when the usa and the, with the euro. and with also some out of power through the sizing that to move. but they seem to be continuum that and they seem to be defending their position by saying that they are cutting the line supply of the arms by doing that. well then these are all thousands of people to pay the streets in tell of be even close to the removal of netanyahu and whose government the purchase jane says was prime minister has wrote in the last few moments. this is public opinion known as well. strategy in the 2016 johnson has shifted, particularly around the issue of hostages, people seeing waving these writing flag and also holding up assignments with some having inspections that say be the enemy of you as well.

it's international children's day and the international festival of bricks, page of schools is kicked off in the russian capital. it'll go on until july, 8th, it says attended by representatives from a number of the breaks countries, including new members at rome. you are, e and belarus. all these correspondence shaped bows brings us this report from the event. welcome to an incredibly sony, beautiful moscow and also to the international theater schools festival is part of the bricks. so that's a tail here at the russia exhibition didn't get an incredible place showcasing everything. russia has to offer culture history, food. so as you can see, there's an incredible, the color and music with the theater screws the players from india, russia,

china, b, u, a. and so don't forget here. it's an incredible event showcasing the patrons on the music of each individual country. of course, we associate briggs switch economics with the global change with you, any polarity, there's always a cultural side. and that's what this big event here in moscow today is all about these countries getting to know each other's colors, culture and music. it's really fantastic to be with all the group from india, from south africa, from russia. art is always, you know, they bring people together. well, waco, cultures maybe different languages, but with art there's only one language are. these are list. it looks like a beach between 2 ok just to systems 2 countries. so definitely it has pot or to hold on. people and to go beyond the language, your language is not going to be the bad year for all of us. what's really exciting

is we're going to be exploring a great uh, classic of russian culture. and we get to add our own individual favorites to that . and then we bring all of these different countries together in one single performance. and that's really something to look forward to at the end of the week . part of the way that we train act as world wide is influenced by a russian practitioner. we wouldn't be training access the way that we were if it wasn't so consenting. says that's key. so when we say we tend, so we're standing on the shoulders of giants and we need to have respect with designs. so as you can see, but i made the parade, is the good and the music is but here the data which was originally opened in 1935 in soviet times to showcase the cultural fruit. an industrial pro with all the different soviet republics. now it's performed the focus of big concerts and events here in moscow. and today the focus

is most definitely on the performing arts built in 1935 as an exhibition center to showcase the, the skills on their products from all the 15 soviet republics. it's a wonderful, wonderful thing to witness, and it really feeds a sense of partnership and friendship with russia under countries that have stuck with in difficult times che bose for ortiz den in moscow. lot. so you run the companies that math is d staying with the say though it all change the national up next fits going underground. the maker and we looked at the situation in rockford garza the whether the us government is incomplete states in any of the crimes against humanity being to make sure that the

the sooner they welcome back to going underground boat crossing all around the world from the u. a where president shakela home had been zaya, and was with chinese president agent being engaging this week, both like the international community condemn. israel is invasion of roughly enabled by the usa, u. k. and the you, nations, today, voters and color bricks, member and biggest democracy in the world. india will decide who they want as prime minister in the final stage. i mean, it's 8 and the general election. i know pac plus meat in vienna to defy us schools to increase energy output. it's also the anniversary of the 1982 signing of

a landmark. i n f nuclear weapons treaty between the usa and russia, torn up by the old trump catalyzing a well today where israel, nato and russia. now named check the foreseeable use of nuclear weapons, whether it be in gaza or ukraine. joining me from falls church in virginia in the usa is a former us army officer, if that is kind of lawrence wilkerson is to just stop at a state department. would you like any blankets up? he adds an unconditional supporter of israel. thank you so much kind of air coming back on monday and beheaded babies in rough or multiple eros, whom is worth of t and t equivalent on garza. and today, the end of us here, the now ended i in f new 3 a treaty. how new is the world to new to use? now of senior senator lindsey graham told me about israel and nuclear weapons just the other day. congressman said the gaza should be new it's interesting that you bring up the.