they go along and of course, as soon as they said, oh, it has to be limited in through the, in the near to the heart of region. on comes the land skin, all his champions in washington any late that was a oh, that's not enough. it has to be unrestricted, then it goes most of america spots, as i said, yeah we, we put no restrictions with all that anything that we have provided. so that's the next step is that, well, let's move back restriction. so it's beverly, as you said, inch by inch, is becoming a direct rule between nato and russia. well, you know, martin, i, you know, um, i look at this in a very simple way. i mean, is it, what is the difference in hinting inside of brushes, territory, or close to conic of what is the difference in hitting, you know, most got it's russian soil. there is no difference here. okay. i don't understand why they think that there says there's an invidious difference there isn't here. what's really interesting to me is that the nato thinks they can do this risk free, which is very,

very dangerous because the entire theory and practice of determines new killer deterrents here is being rapidly degraded. martin? yeah, the risk freezing is very, very worrying. when you hear people like david cameron, who is off by a journalist, well, what happens after we strike into or into the russia, into the, into real russian territory. you know? and his response was neat and russian just have to put out of your crime. that's really the only solution to the fact that this bigoted view of this, this, this incredibly blanket view. you know, so there are no other options for russia and the west has the up behind is really dangerous and really stupid. and now we're beginning to see, you know, how close now we are edging towards the abyss. we keep talking about this on the show. you know, how close we are going into world war 3 scenario. we've talked about it largely as a see a radical subject. i think perhaps at some point it's going to be beyond that because you say there's no difference between um the inside of the boulder and

a new crane. i think there is be. so i really do think there is, i think i think for the rest of the people's or is i think for puts in there is, um, how much further can we continue with storm shot as being flight by british soldiers? no, i think we're agreeing with each other here on this made me because the hitting russian saw it was sitting russian say, oh, you know, if it's near the border, you know, there's somehow different. it's not different. it's the same thing. and george, what's important here this, these is nato, a weaponry, largely controlled by nato personnel if there are soldiers or contractors. and very importantly, it's the, the satellite, the assistance that these weapons means. those are definitely nato, probably american, almost exclusively. this is russia versus nato, nato versus russia, and they used to be acquainted suddenly out of the equation here. that's exactly right, pizza. and these kinds of long range of miss of attacks inside

russia and even the long range drone attacks, they could only succeed if they had guided by satellite systems. there's no way you can just simply locked by a drone and but, and magically hits the target close to the cause ex, them bought a this that requires satellite guidance. the only way that you can get satellite guidance is through nato and the united states. so obviously, the nature about keeping the unites as already involved in firing drones and missiles on behalf of the ukraine's safety this gift. keep in mind the united states has not said that you create a channel. fire misses be on this limits that we're talking about. that always has to be somewhere close to the board or they have not said that. they have just simply said that, um, well, uh, you know, we, we would prefer it if you would limited that, but we don't take 5 in any detail uh took no actually planning up the ukraine

design. how is going to defend itself on the new grant? is right, that depends a we we don't tell you frame what to do so. so in fact that, that's just simply a media hype, disable will get to the door very, very limited, very well. it's not only about the limits it much timely, false. it's a lie, okay. i mean the, the level of encryption that need be, you need to understand read to guide these drones and missiles that is highly secret. they're not passing that onto the ukrainian. so ukrainians are being given that information. maybe they hit a button, but it's already preprogrammed the algorithm is there, martin? it's patently obvious something the george and i, and i think you were all at this time. we discussed that it's, it's only a matter of time before article 5 of the nato treaty as being tested now. it could go in many, many different directions here. it's, there's a, a gross mis reading of what it means that it's not automatic. i'm a member, countries can decide if they want to participate in it. it's not, you know,

if somebody flips a flip, the switch here, but it will test the, the membership of nato. but i think this is an amazingly reckless because once you know the 1st bullet is fired, more is very unpredictable. go ahead and mark, you know, that's the problem. you know, it only takes one, but i only say it's one miscalculated decision on the west. and i wonder if booming those radar installations was really a mistake. i ready to wonder whether we received that the company is a marvin chart. that is the biggest thing that has happened in this conflict. and it's not giving the coverage that is really necessary when i came across at georgia and i talked about it separately. i was horrified, but i still am horrified by martin. and you know, when, when such things happen, you have to wonder how we going over how we post the article 5 of the debate. now, you know, we, we'd be on that now. i mean, all, as some people say the british and he said others as say,

now we all know and what was russia? you know, we also a rock is that russian civilians and soldiers. the question is, you know, when, what does it take, what does it take for boots in to send that message? the fact that you're going to have a line i'm, i'm sure he will be very careful. i mean dos is i'm sure he will exercise extremely amount of caution, but at some point he has to do something. and if you look at some of the realistic proposal targets that he could hit. if you've got any more of this ordinance thrown over the border and russian people, russian civilians are being killed. you know, perhaps the nato installation in germany, the main headquarters would be exactly using the target. well, i mean what we have for right now, george, to go back to history is a problem. um september the 1939 to may of 1940. we had some, it was called the phony war. i think we're in that right now. you were in the state of war, but we, we haven't seen a major escalation. i think we're about to see that right now,

because this is an untenable situation. and the, the, the russians will not compromise their security. this, is it something? and, and you know what, what would be satellites being shot out? but i think that's the most obvious one here is. does that count for invoking article 5? nobody knows george. that's exactly right. i, i would have thought hitting the cyber lights would be the most logical of 1st step . hitting bul drones in the black sea will also be the of the spike drones in the black sea. it would be a logical step where it's, it's clear that the, the, the nato pals have no idea. all the them built in is going to capitulate. that is not the most thing about david cameron's, or will he, you know, what, what if this doesn't work? well, you know, the, yes, the just simply withdrawal from on your brakes that isn't going to happen. russia

is in order to capitulate. so therefore, there is a house that has to be the next step. because russia cannot just simply allow nato's the to be in essentially shooting and killing russians, own russian soil. so that has to be in the next step. and i think, but if we are to precisely been on the brink oval, well well, and that's exactly what you know remarkable speech yesterday by a victim of war. but who said this is the 3rd time we hung, gary ends up being pushed into a wall with russia. so time 19141941 now, and we're not going to do it the 3rd time. and that's, i think he's, the 1st leader was explicitly said, this is the same project. well, well, i'm well to, well, what's right, we've mobilizing your up against russia and i don't know, but i said, well, you know, we don't want to be a positive as well. so well, you know, a little self advertisement, george and i did an extensive video on this in our pod cast style,

the goggle and i, i refer people to it cuz we talked about it a great like what he just said. you know, more modern, you know, a britain is at war with russia. this is what we're being told. well, maybe the british will feel what war is like again because they were reflecting a violence upon the russian citizenry that had to have it hasn't happened yet in britain. it could. yes. good. um, but uh i, i refer you back to a show. we did a couple of months ago when you asked me what my opinion would be alternate, so best a policy and i said expect a lot of fake news. we experiencing the fake news now, here with the room is that i've heard in the last week that nato is planning something big. you know, and this has been fed to a few gullible journalists and it's being pumped up into some flow. and, you know, mark me and you know, i think this one of the things that the, the 3 of us have been doing been pushing back against this year. well, this is all political posturing. it doesn't mean it doesn't have consequences,

but it is political pastoring. that's why they're, they're not thinking strategically. they're thinking politically and we should all be terrified of this process. they're going through gentlemen, i'm going to jump in here. we're going to go to a short break, and after that short break, we'll continue. continue our discussion on some building, stay with our team. the, [000:00:00;00] the at the end of the 18th century, britain began by illegal opium, afraid in china. this hard drug causing addiction and literally destroying the

human body became a gold mine for businessmen from the foggy l. b. a. however, the ruling chinese gene dynasty tried to resist and to stop the illegal trade which provoked the wrath of the london business community. in 1840 without a declaration of war, the english fleet began to seize and plunder chinese coastal boards. sobar lee arm dead for lead drain chinese army, was unable to provide adequate resistance. the jing empire was forced to hand hong gone over to england and open it sports board trading the legal good. in 1856 branch of the united states joined in the robbery of china. the anglo french troops defeated the chinese occupied basie and committed an unprecedented robbery. destroyed and blundered the wells of the un mean you one palace. the defeat of the jing dynasty and the do opium wars lead to the transformation of this. so let's

deal empire into a semi colony of your to be in state and started the age of humiliation. and the sale of opium took on collazo proportions and led to the horrible depths of millions of ordinary chinese in the late 1892 french soldiers led by general paul who arrived in asia with the goal of expanding french control in west africa to the territory of more than shot, the funny, i mean he's stuck up some issues around the cars and just showing the list to the tent, the food i on the east one of the most terrific campaigns of atrocities to have ever taken place in the history of come to the assembly i send you load the questionnaire to download the glass. you followed there to do so they put the

actual most likely multiple villages with devastated on numerous members of resistance groups. what the headed on that apartment is in for us to get the move of nancy, and i'm going to be a young investigator in search of his own identity and box on a journey to africa. the traces general good eyes, blood drenched roots in an effort to establish how your legacy still echoes throughout the continent. so my name is penny, and i come from england and i've come ready to find out more about the position of willy, um, on the history of in the region. the russian states never as tight as i'm one of the most sense community best ingles. all sense and up the consumer

must be the one else calls question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin machine, the state on the rushes per day and split ortiz food next. even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube tv services, for what question did you say even twist, which is the and the world's largest democracy folks. the rest of the plan is watches in an emerging of the color world. india's voice matters, like who will be the power behind watches, almost 1000000000 people decide and billions more,

react the welcome back. across the bullhorn design, peter level command, you were discussing some real news. right, george? you know, we had, we have, for the 1st time in american history, a former president convicted a 30 on 34 accounts. he is legally right now a felon. but he also is the presumptive domini of the republican party. and the 2024 election um your thoughts on this because you know, the, the, the way you uh, the weight's being pitched right now by liberal media primarily. and you said no one will vote for a convicted felon. i think we're good. that's it. is going to be tested very seriously, go ahead or i, i agree with the visa, but it's really interesting that i mean, it's ties in with what we were talking about in the, the 1st off of the show,

which is the united states has become a completely and reckless, irresponsible, useless power in the world. i mean, you, you would be under the doing things. no one would have dropped off, provoking a, a, a world war nuclear apocalypse. and here you have the democratic policy, which is 1st was spend, is essentially uh for the full purposes of domestic politics. whipping up a totally ridiculous, his theory about russian interference in the american domestic politics. impeaching a president full that and making there was totally recklessly responsible attacks on the press. ok, he's working for russia. so now they've gone the extra step and i said, okay, he's a a convicted felon. i think, well that, oh, but that will let us on election, you know, because there is always a click of a sodium for charges unanimous. you guys enjoy it. well, as you said, you know, i don't think that's by that's, that's not a deal breaker. so then you said, well, what's next? what i think, what's next,

is that the democratic judge and the democratic prosecutors in manhattan. i'm going to push forward and imprisonment on july, the 11th one week before the republican nomination, they go to push to imprison donald trump because they're going to say by them they're going to realize they'll, they'll be looking at the polls and that's a business hasn't done anything to damage drunk? well, may i have to go to the next step. what? well, well, what it did was i in one day and i look at them, i get the number on like $36000000.00 in small nations, went into his campaign out. that was the reaction. you know, martin, if they, if this was happening in any other country, the undertaker blinking is, i call him, he would sit me calling the country, you know, the violation of the united nations charter of human rights, real freedom of speech. but know that the state department isn't going to react to what's going on in new york, i guess here. i mean, the double standard is so glaring, and i mean in this administration they're, they're, they're pretty rich in the double standard sky category here, martin. or we have the is it,

you're getting the on the head between the any other countries, i mean to europe. and so, you know, we look to bill clinton's messing around with the, with the modem on it. cuz there's attempts, and it's key in the, in the white house and the french, which is just sort of as well, you know, what's the big data? i mean, you know, every brand, the french president has oral sex with his intent. and, you know, i think it's a similar thing going on here, right across the world and particularly europe, you know, we look at this case against trumbull. we think for goodness sake, you know, he's a wealthy guy who go to his lawyers to pay off people who are black community. i mean, it happens all the time. i mean, i've done so many investigations with well, see people over my career. you know, they just as why your employer is the newest since suit, it happens all the time. yeah, i mean, is really not a big deal. this particular case isn't really a big deal, but it could be this end of the wedge. it could create a momentum and is jewel quite right. your says, you know them, the, the democrats be looking at the polls thinking what this doesn't really have much impacts. lorayne needs to crank it up a bit, but we're going,

it's completely unsolved. walters. i mean america as a brit, it gives me great pleasure to say america is a very young country and you know, then some of this is unprecedented and no history behind it. and you'll be really interesting to see, can we have a president in jail? i think given goes to jail, but just for me, of put my momma savings on the left side. i think maybe you know, martin, but before we get there in a high of it, when trump of met with the media, after the verdict was given to read out to him and there was a headquarter in the crowd. and i don't know if it was a fad or it was a trump support and we'll never probably know. but it was yelled out civil war, which is really, really remarkable. and really scary. you know, you know, judge what they're trying, what they tried to do in this ridiculous trial. i don't know. i think we're pretty smart guys here. our audience is pretty smart, but i've never understood what this case was really about. what was the harm?

i don't know what it was, so. okay. particularly since, you know, new york new a lot about donald trump's personality and character for decades. right now being george, being in the real estate in a sector in new york, which is, you know, it's not really christine if you know what i mean. so sometimes i know trump is a business in new york for 50 years, and he was never charged with a crime and then suddenly this, okay, what this saying is saying is that donald trump not necessarily is corrupt, but the legal system is corrupt because that's exactly right, the, the biggest, this ridiculous thing because you know, anyone who read, you know, the prosecutors and, or try to explain to manage the street. what exactly is the crime? what is it that you're saying? trump is the name will be unable to do it because nobody's able to the, you know, legal x was, are unable to explain what the crime here is. i mean, yeah,

he paid somebody else. that's all the legal. so to make present those 34 count felony, they have to do some convoluted contortions to, to make, make it sound that he has committed these crimes. but on top of that, then you have also in your code that tries to bankrupt, it hits him with a 500000000 dollar sign for alleging fraud. when no one has this can come forward to say that they've been the fruit and no one is going well just like they lost any money. no one was deformed. it's again, a convoluted theory that was uniquely applied to trump. so as well, in this case, you know, there's no rep or any with any anyone being prosecute us with the crimes that trump is. that'd be great, but no rep or anyone being found guilty or for. busy on the new york statute that was used against them. and then we've got all the others going with the zip cd of and he had official class in 5 documents. every president has last away, but still people can see this and say, you twist,

think manip lightnings the legal system to go off the one man. well, that's what the american republic was found. the 2 approved was, you know, we don't have the bills of attains as you know, you don't manipulate the law just to go off the one person. so essentially the, and this is, i think large of the democrats, they've trash the system, they trash the loads, the trash, the quotes in order to win them election will have. so that's a very dangerous game to play. and i think it's going to blow up in the face as well. you know, it's, it is a bit of an echo of 2016 martin because, you know, we have the clinton administration, i'm just like clinton campaign employed there pied piper strategy. you know, they will, they actually pushed him up. i mean, if we look at the media coverage over the last but obviously for the last few days, but, you know, watching a trumps legal travails. you know, just getting a lot of free coverage. okay. and is absurd if these these cases are, they all are absurd. you know, it pump same up. i mean,

the average person is george is pointed out and said it looks like you're just going after the this guy. okay. yeah. in your, in your trashing along the process mark, but that nobody would appreciate that more than shot himself. he would understand the power of the free media oxygen, any way use it is best devices. um you mentioned 2016. i think it's, it's more of an risk resumes for 2006. i think it's a, it's looking like a carbon copy and we won't wait. we will have to wait and see whether the voters use the same russia now. now, as they didn't to see the other 16, a lot of democrats hated henry henry. i'm just wouldn't, didn't want to rent any cost. i'm a product and forbid to even cross the oil and light for trump, just to reform the democratic party and clean up those corruption image. use that to the same things happening in person. but the conservative policy, everybody knows, can somebody buzz, get a full, i'm going to come to each time i almost talking about it being a good thing because we need to use once of them for the concepts reform and come up, you know, come back with a clean more around modern image,

which people will respond to. i think it's only a quarter of regular democrat, but to see the the word for the tray sky. so you can see what's going on here with this which hubs. i think i think great, we're looking at trump coming back into the white house. i think there's no question of that. you know it well, i mean i, i'm of the firm conviction. if he does win the election, they still won't let him get them knock. you rated up, that's a topic for another program here. george, you hear me look at the calculus here. um joe biden. i didn't have to find a primary. it looks like it's going to be a virtual convention that you know, basically the basement strategy. okay, fine. um, um, but no one loves jo by there. a lot of people that disliked him, but no one loves job. i'm just supposed to donald trump. yeah. a lot of people paid donald trump, but a lot of people love donald trump. how do you square? that's very a symmetrical. yeah, that's exactly right. that's what i have to this day. there's so many questions

about the 2020 election because we're all over the warehouse. the believe 81000000 americans voted for this man that nobody loves nobody likes is always been the a washington political hack. a glad hand, a croak. and we're also believe he got 16000000 more votes than bar of obama, who did indeed, as, as you know, inspire many people to go out and vote for the 1st time. that's really the problem . and now it's compounded by the perception that he knows he con, waiting in a fair and square fight, as always ringing the system. when he likes to cheat, you know, if you, you know, you're going him. so a tennis tournament and then you use like the drink of your opponents. nobody's going to thank god and say, hey, you won fair and square and that's really how biden is playing. and so there's this new ad that the republicans are running web ideas getting this going to be able great. and when he is honest, they trump the trump, this thing you were behind those legal troubles. and he says, and he just gives a,

is big the able grants. they're going to play that over and over again. and they can say, yeah, the bite and is kind of tacitly admitting take, i'm cheating and i just love to be president because i'm, she thinks is a very, very unlikable yes. and his eyes. so all the resources, visit ministration behind this. ok. martin, just to finish up here, you know, it's, it's quite, you know, we can do british elections later, but it's worth it. it's a pathetic commentary. but this election in the united states is turning out again to be about personality. so you like and you dislike as a country is going to hell in a handbasket is george pointed out with all these foreign policy crisis going on, where we were asked to judge of or pick between a candidate that is basically c nile and a colorful a real estate mogul. kinda pathetic. go ahead. tv celebrity. yeah. so that in as well. um, unfortunately we've,

we've come to this stage. we come to this point where the system doesn't really allow us to choose any other kind of to, you know, it's pulled down to the stupid and the corrupt or wherever, whichever way you wanna throw it. george's point is very important though, but it isn't like people don't like button. so he's only got policies, you know, all and all skilled luxury, you know, treat to. whereas on the, on the trump side, if you've got personality and, and policies and control. so i usually would run out of time, but i, i think unfortunately i have to start ending all of these programs. why every time we vote we get john mccain. it's all of the time. we have one of the things that goes in budapest and america sort of course, i want to thank our viewers for watching us here at r t c. next time. remember, rust up rules. the voltage to search as well as for the border product.

was wondering what was the one of the sons of this. so basically of course, we need the last name was need read, those can, will be used to live. imagine we have some more for someone who is this, we would show new people to the the on march the 22nd 1943. doing the great petri. i'll take off the shirts and munch fatality and 118. run down the belly, mercy and village of cartoons. or uh,

just ship us on the new originally located in the fitness center. yes. so the, this one, most of the rooms to pony it to you. $149.00 people died, including $75.00 children of age was practically wiped off the face of the law. new blue lives of the auction could have, charlie was, you know, is you, will you put as follows? oh shoot, was i really? i really usually don't you feeling? yes. so the infamous battalion responsible for the atrocity included over $100.00 ukrainian national is from west and you write the picture. all right, and so i'm see what you guys are seeing you on that. so a lot of those to you guys pursuing your opportune um with them us customer with community de classified criminal cases from the central archive of the k g b,

a better rules shut the light on the atrocity and on so numerous questions that have remained an onset for many years. watch on tv. the sooner that said, welcome back to going underground, broadcasting all around the world from the u. a much of the world believe data allies that the washington proxy war on russia through ukraine was unprovoked. the 911 was something to do with i've got this done. that was w, m, d in iraq and the destroying libya was moral today. most of humanity is in no doubt, the genocide in jerusalem and guns has been enabled by the usa and it's puppet western european nations. it will be on show on wednesday when is really celebrate