smith's understands their technologically incapable of doing. they know that they require satellite reconnaissance intelligence. i'm sure and based on that intelligence data, this is us satellite intelligence, they need to put in the flight traffic from the flight mission of the missile. and later put it into the missile system, the system and the service men standing natural to miss wilkes that he's doing that simply automatic is going to be. he's just pushing the button to he might not even know what happens next. these to killing what could be the participation of ukrainian service, man cook, and he's not those who are typing the buttons but higher the and then they can choose the target and they can say, what's the priority target for them? because what they do is not decide whether it's strike this target or not. because yet again, the flight mission of the missile is basically typed in only by those we're providing the weapons to if it's attack comes. and if it gets done by the pentagon, use of storm shadow that's done by the u. k. it's even simpler sometimes because the flight mission is typed in automatically without the service man on the ground . it's done automatically by the u. k. then i said on the,

when the bonus were officers were thinking whether it's right, the crimean bridge or any other facilities. well, they were thinking for themselves, right. but it wasn't done for them and get new sheets. that's what they were going to do. and the same applies to the french specialists resort is done by the western specialist. therefore, we foster no allusion about that usually the post of well how are we to respond when most of the naturally will improve our anti missile defense systems? air defense systems will destroy these incoming missiles, so you might do just a 2nd. we're thinking that if someone believes it possible to provide such weapons to the military, to the war zone, and in order to conduct strikes against our territory, we think 3 issues for us. then why don't we have an opportunity to provide the same class of weapons to those regions of the world where the strikes will be conducted agent, the sensitive facilities of those countries who are doing that against russia. and therefore, the response might be a symmetrical. and we will think about that,

you put a huge number 3 such actions, well, to live deteriorated, live, change the situation for the worse, and then they will continue to deteriorate the international situation and undermine international security. in the end, if we see that such countries are engaged in the war against the russian federation, and that is a direct participation in the war against the russian federation teachers. we leave ourselves the right to respond the same way. it's a path towards very serious issue. this will be done so much as the president given to us and that action was both president trump and the president. by doing, can you give us a quote you to a perspective and you view which one do you think would be the most favorable candidate for a, you know, to us, and the russian relations, given the ongoing war that is going on. and you can know i've already spoken about that, and everyone perceive my statement about president biden with a smirk,

so to speak. and that they saw some kind of hidden critique of president vide, well, indeed he's an, he's an old school politician. and the fact that he didn't like it into a certain extent, he started to attack me, but well, i knew that what happens is that means that i was right and he's predictable to him . that only confirms our notions about what i've talked about. but in general, we don't really care because president trump ex president tron with you, who's accused of being a spy for russia. and we know that's just pure nonsense, just garbage. just an element of domestic and political infighting between democrats and republicans, and baseless ridiculous accusations against trump sort of move. well, we have always perceived that as an element of domestic victory and in the united states that was later confirmed during the national investigation in the us. and there were no connections with president trump is never exist. however, what remains of factors actually during his presidency started to introduce massive sanction the against the russian federation with the, the left,

the intermediate and due to their forces treating that was that happened during who's the president. so, and i'm speaking very sincerely now that we believe we thinking that some scene will change in the us policy regarding russia to, to say, we don't think that anything will change. it has no serious changes, will take place. zoom terminal, nicole, what's happening in the united states? you know, what fully? well, what happens during the political inside when they're burning themselves from the inside and make sure their political system, their state on this. and i have to say whether it's pleasant or not. and there are a legend, leadership and democracy. they're also bringing to the ground because it is apparent to the rest of the world that the prosecution of trust, especially in court. and the allegations that have been due to events that happened years ago without direct approval. well, this is surely using the court system for political purposes you, it's apparent to us here in russia, and i'm sure that it can be seen in the u. k as well. and then the rest of the world can see that as well. and most importantly,

these things out of the united states as well. because after a well known decision of the court where the jury gave a guilty verdict to prove, well, this is purely using the court system for political purposes. we all know that the rating and the ranking of president trump grew by 6 percent right away, i think. and donations to is election campaign also increased because it's what does it tell us? it tells us that the people in the us do not believe the court system, the justice system of the united states when it makes such decisions. and believes that they're politically motivated and maybe it's counterintuitive. you wouldn't form policies in domestic policy and an economic policy as well. and then i think that today's administration or conducting one mistake after another and you sometimes i get surprised at what's happening and therefore we're watching it from the side. we've never interfered. and the domestic politics of the united states, and we do not intend to do it, but we'll see what will happen, what it will lead to elect to wrap up my answer for with what i began with the end

result. and as we believe he does not have a great significance, we'll work with any president elected by the us people to should the, you don't think anything would change in terms of the support for you create for the could in or if tom comes. but you don't think going to be a change to this because it's hard to say, i don't think i can make it clear cut the conclusion whether something will change or not. i think we'll need to take a look at the priority of the future administration to if the future administration is or will follow the national interest. and if they think that the national interest will be to stabilize the situation within the country, not to bet on immigration to consolidate society within the united states, to amend the mistakes that lead to tremendous dash for innovation within the u. s. to been naturally following the domestic national interest, if they would follow them, then it would pursue the goals of global liberals. and so that i think is destroying the united states from the inside ways. but as well as

a strive to be the leader of global liberally, some of them will know. but if they follow the national interest, and maybe there could be some changes in the foreign policy towards russia and towards the conflict in ukraine sophisticated. but remember how many gifts i mentioned to put it in that case, some changes are possible, but i think you would agree with me that no one is interested in the united states in ukraine. they're interested in the magnificence of supremacy and leadership of the united states in the world, and they don't want to allow any kind of success by russia or at least indeed with this. they believe that in that case, that will be detrimental to the us leadership. that's the whole point of what the us is doing. i see for the future and ministration changes the priorities for itself and they would set that goal is differently to use. and they would see that the essence of their work and strengthening the united states from the inside with finance, economy, ship building, normal relations in the world, more respectful towards everyone, and something may change. sure. i think that it depends on the sentiment in the

society, and i think that the sentiment is shifting to that in to the board. and i think that is the future administration. so we'll catch that wind and their sales. then the change is possible for them to proceed with the new book. so i'm gonna use your 3 flag. they are free flags behind your back of russia, but also the soviet union, the end of the russian empire. snuggles the beauty slideshow, brushing and tires and tell us why does it weighs someone suspects that we have some imperial ambitions? please imagine this will bring back the soviet union and will have it for bailey and islamic populations that ever come into your minds. you shouldn't invent anything that's not there when you were not against an increase in these long as the population, the rather happy that it happens in the russian federation now, and i'm going to need some of our per dominantly as law mac. republics. we have a very good birth realtors, and we are very happy about it, but what's past is past the page has been turned. we're looking into the future based on the reality of today. the flags that you see right now are part of our

history. the city and we should not invent anything, we lose these contemplation so. so to shape your opinion about russia, those are your only harming yourself with that. imagine that russia wants to attack nato. what are you done as know who invented that? this is garbage nonsense and nothing else. it would have been just pure garbage if they didn't try to do their populations, that they should cry will and say that russia is trying to attack us. and we need to arm ourselves and send all our weapons to ukraine, but why is it being done to maintain their own imperial domination and greatness minutes, hence the threats and the scary stories are for the moores. why in germany and other parts of europe, there was no such threat and it could never be. we're just sending ourselves a new frame, might be aware of the united states over the ocean. and we're here right now at the move of imagine we would do that in canada right now. what the us is doing at our threshold right here in the ukraine or in mexico. and i see where we can see right now is that the united states now? well, back in the day,

they took part of the mexican territory. and right now they can fight for the return of their territory to it. that's what the western countries are trying to do in terms of the russian ukrainian crisis. you will have you ever considered that you shouldn't look at the flags you have. you should look into the crux of the matter for we have no imperial and vision, believe me, this is nonsense. we'll just like this threat of russia to nato and european countries. if we look at the potential of nato, so she and the russian potential. what do you decide that we're crazy about to do? now, as far as the provision of web injury is concerned, such as applies to conflicts own? well, that is always a bad thing, especially because those who supply weapons are not simply supplying the weapons, are also managing the weapons and control into it. and that is very dangerous and a very serious step. how do we know that in germany does not deny that? i don't know how it got into the media, but you, you know, the generals of the us, we're, we're discussing how and when they were to strike the crimea bridge or other facilities

on the russian territory. on which, including the territories which no one doubts belongs to russian to see it. when the 1st german tanks appeared on the cleaning soil, the german produced tanks because the moral and ethical shock and russia, because our relations with germany had always been very good. so they're going to see right now, you know, this talk that some missiles are going to appear that will strike the russian territories. then this will fully undermine the russian german relations. we understand as a famous german political leader set after the 2nd world war and the germany has never been fully independent doors in the precise sense of the word fully sovereign states or what i see. we were in contact with chancellor shortly so that we had multiple meetings were not given the assessment to the performance of the german government to accept to the german voters, to pass judgment on that. get back to soon the european parliament elections are coming. and we'll see how it goes. you know, i still have many good friends in germany and most, i'm trying not, you know, to compromise them so that they don't have any problems. i try not to maintain

relations right now with them. but i've known them for many years and i've known that they're reliable friends with it. and i've gotten many of those in germany, and i know the landscape and how things go in the political landscape is the cd use around 30 percent? 16 percent is the social democrats, s p d 15 percent alternative for germany, a f, d and the rest. and this is how the voters are responded with. this shows the sentiments among german citizens who said, i mean, i understand germany's independence, the defense and security in general. yeah. i'm cognizant of their dependence on information policy because you know, whatever big media outlet you'll look at, you'll see that the end beneficiary is some kind of american foundation. just going to be in the fall. i apply those americans foundations. so they're doing a great job because they have a tight driven on media landscape in germany. it's lying low, all the while. it's very hard to stand up to that i understand. so however,

some very simple things in those thing as well as even strange that no one today and the german leadership is defending the german interest screen. yes, germany does not have the full sovereignty meyer, but there are jeremy's, and you need to think about their interest when you look at it. so if they blew up those poor pipelines in the baltic sea, no one is even evictions about that as if it's the right thing to do was i'm on my know someone's dog, i think indeed we're until the mid morning and we'll sit down to evaluate for any maintenance trash, those categories are the president and number of people expressed ministration. and you need a letter mention, we did wait on the test out. and the relation was during the time of the president phrase, would like to do that is one of the great services of our president. and i'll be also pointed out the role play design president for i see you now. and then his violin relations and the regional relations. and the question that i wanted to ask you obviously that, that would be continued on the development of relations with iran, which kind of program is trying to see what there's,

there's some agreements achieved with pressing pricey. what is that? and i was looking for the price of ron and russia in the future. one of the developing relations between rushing the road in a steady fashion, making good headway across many avenue which most russia in iran happened to be under sanctions, different sanctions regime. he was surprised when we learned recently some of the levels of technological achievement senior ron told me, we were surprised. however, our ronnie and friends had managed to preserve such a high level of production, industrial production in certain technologies, despite the sanctions hasn't been forced for many years. so we were pleasantly surprised. our trade and economic ties are developing some. we've got many joint projects. we would like to take additional effort aimed at developing high tech and certainly taking into account the restrictions use and this is going to be difficult, but still it can be done. and this is something we're going to do. so now as for present, right, i see who is killed in this tragedy. we would like to say that we had very good

notion, reliable of the business like relations with having to use a very interesting person who was a series politician, see reliable partner. so he possessed a great sense of irony and humor things, and it was very interesting person to talk to don't want to communicate with. not just interesting, but also useful jim. and i would like to say that if we achieve degrees in with him on something, then one could be a 100 percent. sure, because this issue would not be lost sight of illness. but that doesn't mean that all issues have been resolved because it's not just up to the leaders that these issues depend on you what we were working together to improve and enhance our relations. as it was under president rice and ron had joined bricks and the seal, which is testimony to the fact that we were moving together in the right direction . in particular, in the direction of setting up a multi paula world order in blue. and iran had continued to play a significant role in that regard. there's one thing i would like to say concluding my answer to your question about the issue. i would like to say that we're hopeful

that everything that has been achieved by president rice and rushing a ronnie and relations is going to be picked up and continue. and i have no doubt that this is exactly what's going to happens. this is because everything we're doing to show it meets the mutual interest of a rush any wrong. so we know that the iranian statehood is very stable. that the too many, we're aware how the executive and the power system in iran are organized, listed in the we know that it's not just the president and his colleagues who worked on for mazda, because you see the supreme leader is also playing the significant role in that regard station and pretty so we're waiting for the elections of the next president to have to. and i look forward to meeting the new president over on different international events, including the shanghai cooperation organization and the brand was assigned to it. and i'm confident that we will find common ground and we'll follow up on these projects whose foundations were late by the late president rising. and millions of people around the world are opposing the attacks against the guys and people which is amount to the level of genocide right now. and

what's russia has a wait for his intent to play a role in the solution of the situation. right, and having gaza and do you have any intention to also get the security council in motion? and because of the people, not only the guys and people about the posting and people in general and the people off a different origins, religion at the city, and free from any identity. and background at the people of role that are actually asking for the big powers to finish what is happening right now on the ground in the cousins. thank you. the beatrix disclosures because it's, well the 1st thing i want to say is that we're certainly against terrorism. in all its forms and we're against attacks and the civilian population in any place in any countries. but what we're seeing today and gaza in response to the well known

terrorist attacks in israel does not look like a war. it looks like a total destruction of the civilian populations from goods. i can only reiterate russia's official position, easiest thing with the, in this the result of the united states policies with which moved away all the tools that had been a created for attempting to collective solution to this problem may be somewhat of the us administration decided that if you have more options, the process will be set up. but experience has shown michelle, this is not true, but it isn't in resolving this issue. so just providing material resources is also not a promising endeavor on that. but when you mentioned this, a solution to political questions such as the fate of the palestinian people and it's historical prospects can not be solved by providing someone's economic handouts. of course, it is a necessary component to create an environment where a solution can be found, but you must address the political question. and the main political question for

revolves around the creation of the palestinian state. the 2 state solution was a mandated by the human decision to go so that the house command states to co exist with the jewish state. so without addressing the key issues, resolving the substance of this problem would not be positive. but then the russian position here is principal, and it does not depend on the current situation with them. it has been standing since the soviet times. we know that president or the one is making energetic efforts to achieve a solution because it is a difficult problem. looks and considering his high authority in the region like he's and in the world in the as lama coiled. first of all, i think is making a significant contribution in russia on it. sparks is willing to do everything and to help solve this less he especially considering the relations that you've achieved with the state of israel over recent decades. so, so to give a place a bus, who knows what has been going on for 8 months, tremulous that they all said to on stuff onto the gets home us. yeah. you know,

it's to that. so how do you see the scenario? how do you see a got this confidence unfolding and given your diploma to you know, the nation's cloud was to parks, you know, sort of g was home us even with the is the, i don't know is it's a bit strange. but with gunfire guns these jews think of playing a leading role in it in uh, getting an end to the conflict based on a 2 state solution as of a difficult for us and really believes that that is hold for the, for the city and state this is one and then i think there is whole use in particular due to the fact the dose in the us. and in israel there are people who advocate for a 2 state solution. you'll notice there are people there who believe that this is precisely because it has pursued the so, namely to set up 2 sovereign states. people live in. there are people who believe that this path is going to lead us to piece. and this is what we'll allow finding

the piece formulas. as for russia playing a leading role, i don't think we need to do that because there are many players who are involved in that conflict. and who have a great deal of influence with the developers were making a contribution to finding the solution is something we could do given the relationships if we have fostered over the recent decades with israel. and also given the relations we have traditionally had with these mom in that role with the arrow more uh these relations are based on trust. but i think that the main contribution was need to come from the countries of the region and also the regional organizations such as the organization for as long as the cooperation, mostly the arab league of the neighboring countries, such as the egypt, saudi arabia, the gulf countries took the thing as one of the leading players and these long and world set and certainly the us to meet them. we're not holding onto some extreme, this position according to which the us has to be excluded from the settlement. that's just impossible on the new and israel has to play

a role as well because this is what the golden mean needs to be found. and i reiterate this can be done, given the sentiments in the american society is rarely society. given the sentiment in the error of the world is going on as while mac world is, we're trying to do what we can provide in particular humanitarian assistance. as you're aware of, we played a certain role in securing the release of several hostages of russian origin. so should we continue to work in pursuing this avenue by working with our partners discussion with your options, saying that we've got good relations with based on trust. and we've been fostering those relations for decades. but we need to work together rather than trying to monopolize or piece process that would be hard for sure, because monopolizing could be a good thing if the one doing the monopolizing start with mutual position. but the monopolize, or is incapable of pursuing this neutral position sooner or later its sides with one of the sides. it all falls apart, resulting in the tragedies like the ones we are currently witnessing about the

scenario. how do you see this conflict now door and goes down for them? and one of those questions on the menus, for sure, we have come up with a number of initiatives to you in securities council calling for a cease fire like you us is blocked. that is on the veto in those initiatives. just a moment and how do we've been working solidarity the trying to secure an agreement that would be a positive scenario. but so far it has not succeeded directly call for a ceasefire because she this initiative and that an issue there had not been reciprocal vito's rather trying to find a solution working together. and that would probably be the path towards finding the solution to this problem, to the solos, to addition, the problem is, and another question you wanted to ask is just my question. is that going back to kind of what to do to get a nuclear war? and how it goes, oh, each doctor is the limit

to slipknot. so you know, there are always accusations for august. we are a nuclear cyber rattling with the but i'm either one asking the question about the possible need because i'm your, you're the one to ask a big question. you're pushing me towards this question. and then you'll say that i've been brandishing with you to their truncheon about those. this is a very graves some young to do the us as the only country to of use nuclear weapons during the 2nd world war 2 are seen by dr. socks, 20 killer tires of the car, tactical nuclear weapons, similarly 775 kilograms. just the package will need to, i mean, he comes in, so let's not push the situation to towards the point. so wouldn't even the threat is involved, let alone the nu. so when you see the weapons, for some reason, the west believes that russia is never going to resort to that. but we've got a new doctor in place. he does have a look at it to look. what does it say? it says that someone else's action is to just threaten our sovereignty or

territorial integrity and then we leave. we have the right to use all the tools we've had artist or something. no. and no one should take that lightly. or super officially, there needs to be in the professional view of that, but you should and i am hopeful that everyone across the world is going to receive that in this fashion. when addressing such issues the, the, [000:00:00;00]

the, [000:00:00;00] the scenes, the beginning of its history, the united states of america has officially declared this driving for freedom and people's rights to happiness. however, in reality, having won independence, american colon is tested for the total extermination of the indigenous population of the continent. american indians were deprived of their land. local residents were driven into reservation given the worst agricultural territories. while the best land was appropriated by white colonize as the strongest blow to american indian tribes was the extermination of vice of native americans lived by hunting

these wild animals, colonists slaughtered the bison, and in fact, made them nearly extinct. every buffalo did, he's in india and gone, said colonel richard dogs, a veteran of the bloody and vicious indian wars cynically. the indigenous population was simply exterminated us army general phillips sheridan express the evidence of this policy in the infamous words. the only good india is a dead indian, the genocide of native americans of north america lead to a demographic catastrophe. the exact number of deaths is still unknown, but the number of victims is in millions. having been a majority on the continent before the indigenous people make up less than 3 percent of the us population today, the there's no end in sight over how you're going to continue to destroy the or is the case of the med, most of the people i tried to go to the gym,

but i'm certainly not ready to fight russia. this is also a soon. this is the 3rd world lunacy re washington. press 4. so the lion likes to say, we have the tools while we just start with stability and business deal. so we were living on that. we have very close propaganda. you know, a price here in new york. i think we don't know the aftermath any time that you're not allowed to ask questions, you should ask all of the questions. some more questions ask a better the answer is, will be the the take a fresh look around his life. kaleidoscopic isn't just

a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse who really wants a better wills, and is it just because it shows very few fractured images presented as fast? can you see through their illusion going underground? can i look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except we're so shorter is it conflict with the 1st law? show your mind, anticipation for should be very careful about personal intelligence. at the point, obviously, is to makes a trust rather than the various jobs. i mean, with the artificial intelligence, we have somebody with him in the

robot must protect his phone, existence was on the should be, can someone believes it is possible to supply such weapons and rewards that we need to strike our territory. the response could be a symmetric from platinum, or put the warrens that russia is considering heading the west where it hurts after nato countries approved for an in strikes of russian territory. and also slammed the false narrative as politicians used to escalate the war. with the new you made up that boss who wants to attack major, are you completely crazy down like this? they came up with this. it's nonsense. you know? sure that's relevant. similar to this little by prime minister makes his 1st public