policy, the united states was that far one should have qualitative, as well as a quantitative military advantage versus trying to unfortunately for taiwan, we certainly know that trying to now has a want to change of advantage in arguably you might have a qualitative advantage. i think going forward in the near term. if taiwan is a willing buyer, generally speaking to you, why she's going to be a willing seller of weapons. all right, just stay with us here on our tea international. i'll be back with much more news in about 30 minutes. the,

the for the find another mind us about the latest events in the ukraine city, secretary general of nato mystery solved, lindberg suggested that to be, that you can be given an opportunity to try and refreshing how to make a territory using the weapons procured from the quote from you or some group in countries if weighed with is no changes including the united states and not all of them. but the united states are also close to still some countries that housing discussions about sending smelled you instructors and counselors here that i'd like to ask you to comment on these 2 decisions. what would be the best response to that

to us? thank you. this is this because it has funny house sellers and instructors and their presence there. there's nothing new new they are already present this on the ukrainian territory. unfortunately for them, you know, they're incurring losses. i know that for sure. and they're not being targeted specifically what it just happens to me is, but the european countries in the united states prefer to keep that silent little here in a 2nd. let me ask for high precision long range weapons. and i think we need to break this topic down into to deal 1st. the conventional arms multiple launch rockets, systems of 70 kilometer range are so mystical, please been used for very long time, but it was indeed the cranium service mentioned. do that on their own. now, as for high tech, modern, high precision, precision guided the long range weapons, such as the storm shadow of u. k, were attack ends of the us. it was over the french missiles as well, and it bears repeating. and since i've said it before, when i traveled

a central asian country is to the attack them through 300 kilometer range and how they use suits and how are they transfer? okay, as well. so they've transferred the missile system here it was given by the pentagon, inside the us. how is it used as to pursue ukrainian service? men cannot independently conduct the striking with dismissal, understands their technologically incapable of doing that, you know, for that they require satellite reconnaissance intelligence. i'm sure and based on that intelligence data, this is us, the satellite intelligence they need to put in the flight travel from the flight mission of the missile. and later put it into the missile system in the service and standing there was a missile. he's doing that simply automatic and then we, he's just pushing the button was to he might not even know what happens next. these to killing what could be the participation of ukrainian service, man cook, and he's not those who are typing the buttons. what am i or the and then they can choose the target and they can say, what's the priority target for them and becomes what they do not decide whether to strike this target or not. because yet again, the flight mission of the missile is basically typed in only by those we're

providing the weapons to if it's attack comes and if it gets done by the pentagon, you so the storm shadow that's done by the u. k. it's even simpler sometimes because the flight mission decreases, typed in automatically without the service man on the ground. it's done automatically by the u. k. then i say that when the bonus were officers were thinking whether it's right the crime in bridge or any other facilities. well, they were thinking for themselves, right, but it wasn't done for them to get an issue. that's what they were going to do. and the same applies to the french specialist resort is done by the western specialist . therefore, we foster no allusion about that. usually the proof of, well, how are we to respond when most of the naturally will improve our anti missile defense systems? air defense systems will destroy these incoming missiles. so you might do just a 2nd. we're thinking that if someone believes it possible to provide such weapons the military to the war zone and in order to conduct strikes against our territory, we think 3 issues for us. then why don't we have an opportunity to provide the same

class of weapons to those regions of the world where the strikes will be conducted agent to the sensitive facilities of those countries who are doing that against russia. and therefore, the response might be a symmetrical. and we will think about that, you put a key to number 3, such actions. well, we've deteriorated so they've changed the situation for the worse, and they will continue to deteriorate the international situation and undermine international security. in the end, we see that such countries are engaged in the war against the russian federation. and that is a direct and participation in the war against the russian federation teachers. we leave ourselves the right to respond the same way. it's a path towards very serious issue. this will be done such as the president given us a good action was both a president the top and the president. by doing, can you give us a quote you to a perspective and you view which one do you think would be the most favorable

candidate for a, you know, to us, and the russian relations, given the ongoing war or that is going on. and you can now i've already spoken about that and everyone perceive my statement about president biden with a smirk, so to speak. and that they saw some kind of hidden critique of president by, well, indeed, he's an old school politician. and the fact that he didn't like it, there's into a certain extent he started to attack me, but well, i knew that what happens is that means that i was right and he's predictable to him . that only confirms our notions about what i've talked about. but in general, we don't really care because president trump ex president tron with you, who's accused of being a spy for russia. and we know that's just cure nonsense, just garbage. just an element of domestic and political infighting between democrats and republicans, and baseless ridiculous accusations against trump sort of move. well, we have always perceived that as an element of domestic vickery,

and in so in the united states, that was later confirmed during the national and investigation in the us. and there were no connections with president trump is never exist. however, what remains, the fact is actually during his presidency, he started to introduce massive sanctions against the russian federation, but he left the intermediate new to their forces treating that was that happened during his the president. so, and i'm speaking very sincerely now that we believe, and if we thinking that some scene will change in the us policy regarding russia to the sick, we don't think that anything will change because no serious changes will take place . so i'm telling them, you know, what's happening in the united states. you know, what fully, well, what happens during the political inside when they're burning themselves from the inside and much of their political system, their state on this. and i have to say whether it's pleasant or not. and there are legend leadership and democracy, they're also bringing to the ground because it is apparent to the rest of the world that the prosecution of trust, especially in court. and the allegations that happened due to events that happened

years ago without direct approved. well, this is we currently use in the corporate system for political purposes. it's apparent to us here in russia, and i'm sure that it can be seen in the u. k as well, and then the rest of the world can see that as well. and most importantly, these things out of the united states as well. no. because after a well known decision of the court where the jury do have a guilty verdict to prove, well, this is purely using the court system for political purposes. we all know that the rating and the ranking of president trump grew by 6 percent right away. i think and donations to his election campaign also increased because it's what does it tell us? it tells us that the people in the us do not believe the court system, the justice system of the united states when it makes such decisions. and believes that they're politically motivated, maybe it's counterintuitive. you wouldn't form policies in domestic policy and an economic policy as well. and then i think that today's administration or conducting

one mistake after another. and sometimes i get surprised what's happening. therefore, we're watching it from the side. we've never interfered and the domestic politics of the united states. and we do not intend to do it, but we'll see what will happen, what it will lead to elect wrap up my answer with what i began with the end result . and as we believe he does not have a great significance, we'll work with any president elected by the us people to should the, you don't think anything would change in terms of the support for you create for the clinton or if tom comes. but you don't think going to be a change to this because it's hard to say, i don't think i can make it clear cut the conclusion whether something will change or not. i think we'll need to take a look at the priority of the future administration to if the future administration is or will follow the national interest. and if they think that the national interest will be to stabilize the situation within the country, not to bet on immigration to consolidate a society within the united state of stuart to amend the mistakes that lead to

tremendous data for innovation within the us. to then that surely following the domestic national interest, if they would follow them, then it would pursue the goals of global liberals. and that i think is destroying the united states from the inside. but he's very well they strive to be the leader of global liberally. some of them will know, but if they follow the national interest, then maybe there could be some changes in the foreign policy towards russia and towards the conflict in new cranial sophisticated. but remember how many? yes, i mentioned to put in that case some changes are possible, but i think you would agree with me that no one is interested in the united states in ukraine. they're interested in the magnificence in supremacy and leadership of the united states in the world. and they don't want to allow any kind of success by russia, or least indeed because they believe that in that case it is that will be detrimental to the us leadership. that's the whole point of what the us is doing. i see what is the future administration changes the priorities for itself. they would set that

goal is differently to use and they would see that the essence of their work and strengthening the united states from the inside with finance, economy, ship building, normal relations in the world. more respectful towards everyone and something may change. sure. i think that it depends on the sentiment in the society. and i think that the sentiment is shifting to that end to the board. and i think that if the future administration, so we'll catch that wind in their sales, then the change is possible for them to proceed with an email to the user 3 flag you. there are free flags behind, you know, things like of russia, but also the soviet union, the end of the russian empire. that was the beauty certified progression and tires and tell us why there's anyway, someone suspects that we have some imperial ambitions. please imagine this will bring back the soviet union and will have a prevailing islamic populations that ever come into your minds. you shouldn't invent anything that's not there when you were not against an increase in these long population. the rather happy that it happens in the russian federation now,

and i'm going to need some of our per dominantly islamic republic. so we have a very good birth rate us and we are very happy about the woods past is because the page has been turned when we're looking into the future. so, based on the reality of today, the flags that you see right now are part of our history and cindy, and we should not invent anything we lose these contemplation so. so to shape your opinion about russia, those are your only harming yourself with that. imagine that russia wants to attack nato. what are you done? that's know who invented that? this is garbage nonsense and nothing else. it would have been just pure garbage if they didn't try to do their populations, that they should cry will then say that russia is trying to attack us. and we need to arm ourselves and send all our weapons to ukraine. but why is it being done to maintain their own imperial domination, greatness. hence, the threats and the scary stories are for the boys. why in germany and other parts of europe? there was no such threat and it could never be. we're defending ourselves and you

frame might be aware of the united states over the ocean. and we're here right now at the move of imagine we would do that in canada right now. what the us is doing at our threshold right here in the ukraine or in mexico, and i see where we can see right now is that the united states now? well, back in the day, they took part of the mexican territory and right now they can fight for the return of their territory to it. so that's what the western countries are trying to do in terms of the russian ukrainian crisis. you would have you ever considered that you shouldn't look at the flags that we should look into the crux of the matter for we have no imperial and vision. believe me, this is nonsense. we'll just like this threat of russia to nato and european countries. if we look at the potential of natal machine and the russian potential, what do you decide that we're crazy about to do? now as far as the provision of weapons really is concerned, such as applies to conflicts. so well, that is always a bad thing, especially because those who supply weapons are not simply supplying the weapons.

they're also managing the weapons and control in the good. and that is very dangerous and a very serious step when know that in germany does not deny that. i don't know how it got into the media. but you, you know, the generals of the end as well, were discussing how and when they were to strike the crimean bridge or other facilities on the russian territory and including the territories which no one doubts belongs to russian to see it. when the 1st german tanks appeared on the cleaning soil with german produce tanks, because the moral and ethical shock and russia, because our relations with germany had always been very good. so they're going to see right now, you know, this talk that some missiles are going to appear that will strike the russian territories. then this will fully undermine the russian german relations. we understand as a famous german political leader said after the 2nd world war and the germany has never been fully independent, it was in the precise sense of the word must pony sovereign states, or what i see. we were in contact with chancellor shortly so that we had multiple

meetings. i would not give any assessment to the performance of the german government to accept to the german voters to pass judgment on that. get back to soon the european parliament elections are coming and we'll see how it goes. you know, i still have many good friends in germany and i'm trying not, you know, to compromise them so that they don't have any problems. i try not to maintain relations, right. now with them, but i've known them for many years and i've known that they're reliable friends with it. and i've gotten many of those in germany, and i know the landscape and how things go and the political landscape is the cd use around 30 percent. 16 percent is the social democrats, s p d 15 percent alternative for germany, a f d and the rest. and this is how the voters or respond to it. this shows the sentiments among german citizens. he said, i mean, i understand germany's independence, the defense and security in general. yeah. i'm cognizant of their dependence on information policy because, you know, whatever big media outlet you'll look at,

you'll see that the in beneficiary is some kind of american foundation. just going to be and you know, while i apply those american foundation so, so they're doing a great job because they have a tight grip on media landscape in germany lying low, all the while. it's very hard to stand up to that and i understand some however, some very simple things in those thing as well as even strange that no one today and the german leadership is defending the german. interesting, yes, germany does not have the full sovereignty, but there are jeremy's and you need to think about their interest, but you might look at it so they blew up those poor pipelines in the baltic sea. no one is even an eviction is about the amount as if it's the right thing to do. come out was i'm on my know some of the things. indeed, we're until the mid morning and we'll sit down to evaluate for an administrator status or the president, a number of people expressed ministration. and you need a letter mention we, they're waiting on the test out. and the relation was during the time of the present phrase would have to be that is one of them,

great services of our president. and i'll be also pointed out the role played by impressing proceeds, development as bilingual relations, and the regional relations. and the questions that i wanted to ask you, obviously that, that would be continued on the development of relations with the right. and what kind of program is trying, do you see where there's some agreements achieved with pressing pricey? what is that? and i would look for the progress of ron and russia in the future. one of the developing relations between rushing the rod in a steady fashion, making good headway across many avenue just by which most russian iran happened to be under sanctions, different sanctions regime. and he was surprised when we learned recently some of the levels of technological achievement senior ron told me, we were surprised. however, our ronnie and friends had managed to preserve such a high level of production, industrial production in certain technologies, despite the sanctions that have been forced for many years. so we were pleasantly surprised. our trade and economic ties are developing some we've gotten many joint projects. we would like to take additional effort aimed at developing high tech and

certainly taking into account the restrictions use. this is going to be difficult, but still it can be done. and this is something we're going to do. so now as for present, right, i see who is killed in this tragedy. we would like to say that we had very good notion reliable business like relations with him today. he was a very interesting person and you know he was a serious politician. c. o reliable partner. so he possessed a great sense of irony and humor things and it was very interesting person to talk to him to, to communicate with. not just interesting, but also useful jim. and i would like to say that if we achieve degrees in with him on something, then one could be a 100 percent. sure that this issue would not be lost sight of illness. but that doesn't mean that all issues have been resolved or she because it's not just up to the leaders that these issues depend on you what we were working together to improve and enhance our relations. as it was under president rice and ron had joined bricks and the seal, which is testimony to the fact that we were moving together in the right direction

. in particular in the direction of setting up a multi polar world order in blue. and iran had continued to play a significant role in that regard. there's one thing i would like to say concluding my answer to your question of the issue. i would like to say that we're hopeful that everything that has been achieved by president rice and russian a. ronnie and relations is going to be picked up and continue. and i have no doubts that this is exactly what's going to happens is because everything we're doing, they shouldn't need the mutual interest of a rush or any wrong savings. or we know that the iranian statehood is very stable. that the too many, we're aware how the executive and the power system in iran are working. i've listed in the we know that it's not just the president and his colleagues who worked on for mazda, because you see the supreme leader is also playing the certificate role in that regard station. and so we're waiting for the elections of the next president to have to and i look forward to meeting the new president over on different international events, including the shanghai cooperation organization and the brain was assigned to it.

and i'm confident that we will find common ground and we'll follow up on these projects whose foundations were laid by the late president vices, and millions of people around the world are opposing the attacks against the guys and people which is amount to the level of genocide right now, and then what's russia has a way for his intent to play that role in the solution of the situation right now having gaza and do you have any intention to also get the security council in motion? and because of the people, not only the guys and people about the posting and people in general and the people off the different origins, religion at the city are free from any identity and backgrounds. the people of the world are actually asking for the big powers to

finish what is happening right now on the ground in a 1000. thank you here to extinguishers because it's, well, the 1st thing i want to say is that we're certainly against terrorism in all its forms and we're against attacks and the civilian population in any place in any countries. but what we're seeing today and gaza in response to the well known terrorist attack in israel does not look like a war. it looks like a total destruction of the civilian populations from goods. i can only reiterate russia's official position, easiest with the interest of the result of the united states policies, which moved away all the tools that had been a created for attempting to collective solutions. this problem may be somewhat of the us administration, decided that you have the option to renew, but the process will be set up for the experience as show and make sure that this is not true, but it isn't in resolving this issue. so i just providing material resources is also not a promising endeavor. i'm on that. but when you mentioned it's a solution to political questions such as the fate of the palestinian people. and

it's historical prospects cannot be solved, is my per writing some economic handouts. of course, it is a necessary component to create an environment where a solution can be found, but you must address the political question. and the main political question for revolves around the creation of the palestinian state. the 2 state solution was a mandated by the human decision to go so that the house is gonna be a states to co exist with the jewish state. so without addressing the key issues, resolving the substance of this problem would not be positive, but then the russian position here is principal and it does not depend on the current situation with them. it has been standing since the soviet times. we know that president are the one who is making energetic efforts to achieve a solution to this. a difficult problem looks and considering his high authority in the region and in the world in the islamic world. first of all, i think he was making a significant contribution and rush, certainly minded sparks,

is willing to do everything we can to help solve this. let's see, especially considering the relations that you've achieved with the state of israel over recent decade so. so to give a place a bustle, you know, then what has been going on for 8 months, the tremulous, 1030. i'll set you on stuff onto the, gets home us. yes, you know, it's through that. so how do you see the scenario? how do you see a got this confidence unfolding and given your diploma to you know, the nations of the cloud was depressed, you know, sort of g was home us even with the is the, i don't know is it's a bit strange, but with gunfire guns these jews think of playing a leading role in, in getting an end to the confidence based on a 2 state solution as of a difficult for us and really believes that there is hope for the, for the city and state. this is one and then nickerson creek. there is whole years in particular due to the fact that most in the us and

in his room, there are people who advocate for a 2 state solution. you'll notice there are people there who believe that this is precisely because it has pursued the says, namely to set up 2 sovereign states people. and there are people who believe that this path is going to lead us to peace. and this is what we'll allow finding the piece for me, let me ask for russia playing a leading role. i don't think we need to do that because there are many players who are involved in that conflict and who have a great deal of influence with the developments we're making a contribution to finding the solution is something we could do given the relationships of who we have fostered over the recent decades with israel and also given the relations we have traditionally had with these mom in that role with the arrow more uh these relations are based on trust. but i think that the main contribution was need to come from the countries of the region and also the regional organizations such as the organization for as long as the cooperation, let's say the arab league of the neighboring countries, such as the egypt,

saudi arabia, the gulf countries which are key as one of the leading players and the islamic world, and certainly the us to meet them. we are not holding on to some extremist positions just according to which the us has to be excluded from the settlement. that's just impossible on the new and israel, and it has to play a role as well. this is what the golden mean needs to be found. and i reiterate this can be done given the sentiments in the american society. so humans railey societies has given the sentiment in the air in the world is going on as long as the world we're trying to do what we can provide in particular humanitarian assistance. as you're aware of, we played a certain role in securing the release of several hostages of russian origin. so should we continue to work in pursuing this avenue by working with our partners discussion in your app. just saying that we've got good relations with based on trust, and we've been fostering those relations for decades. but we need to work together rather than trying to monopolize the peace process that would be harmful to us

because monopolizing it could be a good thing. if the one doing the monopolizing start with mutual position and with the monopolize or is incapable of pursuing this neutral position sooner or later its sides with one of the sides in it all falls apart, resulting in the tragedies like the ones we are currently witnessing about the scenario, how do you see this conflict now door and goes on for the and one last question. the pressure on the menus for sure, we have come up with a number of initiatives you insecurities. council calling for a cease fire like you us is blocked. that is on the veto in those initiatives. here's the moment we've been working solidarity the trying to secure an agreement. that would be a positive scenario. but so far it has not succeeded directly call for a ceasefire because she this initiative and that an issue there had not been reciprocal vito's rather trying to find a solution working together. and that would probably be the path towards finding

the solution to this problem, to the solos, to addition you put it in another question you want us to ask. it is just my question. is that going back to kind of what to do to get a nuclear war and how it goes. oh, each doctor is the religious slipknot. so you know, there are always accusations for august. we are a new killer cyber rattle. it was here, the one asking the question about the possible and the, because i'm your, you're the one to ask a big question. you weren't pushing me towards this question. and then you'll say that i've been brandishing that lead to their truncheon about, i'm as good as a fairy graves. somebody on the us as the only country to of use nuclear weapons during the 2nd world war 2 or seem on august socks, 20 kilo tires the car, tactical nuclear weapons. similarly 775 kilograms is just the package of the i mean, he comes in. so let's not push the situation to towards the point. so when you even

a threat, us involved, let alone the new. so we need to the weapons. for some reason, the west believes that russia is never going to resort to that. but we've got a new doctrine in places and just have a look at it to what does it say? it says that someone else is action is to just threaten our sovereignty or territorial integrity to then we leave. we have the right to use all the tools we had artist or something. no. and no one should take that lightly or super officially, there needs to be in the professional view of that, but you should and i am hopeful that everyone across the world is going to receive that in this fashion. when addressing such issues, the there's no end in sight over how you're going to continue to destroy the earth. is

the case for the madness of the people. i tried to go to the gym, but i'm certainly not ready to fight russia. this is also absurd. this is the 3rd world lunacy re washing press for so the funder line likes to say we have the tools while we just start with stability and business deals to be living online. we have fabulous propaganda. you know a price here in new york. i think we don't know the aftermath any time that you're not allowed to ask questions, you should ask all of the questions. the more questions ask the better the answer is will be what i want sure. seems wrong. just don't have to shape out and engagement equals the trail. when so many find themselves will to part, we choose to look so common ground the

the, the should be, can someone believes that it's possible to supply such weapons rewards only, you know, the destruct our territory. the response could be facing metric vladimir, but warns that moscow is considering sending weapons to regents from much countries that are pretty strikes on rush. i can be hit that and also slammed the false narratives. politicians used to escalate the war. lulu made up that washer wants to attack tomato. are you completely crazy? that's like this stable came up with this. it's nonsense. you know, that's rubbish. summary of our prime minister makes his 1st public address after a failed assassination attempt suggesting his views made him a target. anyone who does most identify with a single mandatory opinion is immediately labeled as.