people go, they continue to do with their what they're doing. they continue to get away with making very poor decisions, gross negligence, putting profits in front of safety and the risk and everybody's lives. employees specifically, voice concerns about quality gaps and other issues related to the 787. in the time period between 20202022. boeing pushed back saying you can't insure safety and durability, boy, in his food and confidence. in the $787.00 dreamliner, because of the comprehensive was done to ensure they call it c and low and some safety of the craft claims about the structural integrity of the $787.00. i inaccurate the interest rates having subject to rigorous engineering examination on the u. s. federal obligation of ministration oversights. this analysis has validated that the aircraft will maintain its, your ability and service lives over several decades. and these issues did not present any safety concerns. customers continue to be honest,

a suffering for boeing's mistakes. people forget is that a lot of these airplanes that are in the united states or in europe right now may go to other countries in the future when they're 20 years old or whatever. and those plans need to be safe, right? the people in those countries that you know, maybe they're socio economically challenged or whatever they, they deserve the have safe airplanes. and so, you know, this isn't just about the united states obviously. and this is a global, a global issue. there's no excuse only 20 inspectors are present at the boeing plants, even those thousands of people work there. the f a conducted 89 product tests and boeing failed 33 of them. the agency also conducted 13 separate product audits on spirit arrow systems which manufacturers the $737.00 max fuselage. they

receive 7 failing grades. another whistleblower with whom we spoke was joe jacobson, a retired f, a, a safety engineer. i avoid the, the boeing max and that's because i've been tracking all of the in flight issues since it went back to the service. i was part of the re certification effort. and i know there's still some safety concerns with the design. but there's also manufacturing defects that we've been tracking. we're seeing, for example, um the main up down control device on the airplane is the horizontal stabilizer that's driven by a single motor. and that motor is fail dozens of times since it's gone back into service. and this is on new airplanes, and that's, that's a critical piece of, of hardware. you have to ask, why would such a big story related to human deaths get ignored add pearson gave his thoughts on

why they're getting away with it, getting away with it because they have, you know, friends in high places. um or, but this comes down to leadership or lack. i mean, we want the blowing company to be successful. i mean, one of the things i've learned as a whistleblower and, and in talking with other whistle blowers is, you know, they, they want their companies to do the right thing. but that's why they're, they're disturbed by what they're seeing and they do everything they can to try to bring attention to these matters. slowing is an incredibly important company for united states. so no one wants to see boeing fail because it's, uh, it's too big of a blow to the united states economy is one, sam salad. poor a boeing engineer, testified on capitol hill. do you said that he feared physical violence as retaliation? for his words. again, i raised concerns internally, i was sidelined, i was told to shut up, i received physical threats. my boss said i would have killed someone who said,

but you said this fears are reasonable to boeing. whistle blowers recently died. one from an eye infection. the other from a blow that he is reported to have inflicted on himself. many observers are looking on and saying, what is going on at boeing, a with mopping party, new york. many thanks for your company this the say and some, oh no stories. don't forget to check on websites onto you don't come about with the very latest news on the face and just a few minutes by the the union, including a meeting in negotiations over the course of 10 the last 10 years and,

and the one of the mega projects that to, to you and rush, i have a and a 2 together was the main building often nuclear power plant in korea. so for the future, and now uh, is there any development on russian side regarding the, and the re regarding the movement in production or the construction project off the gas, the center that was being discussed in the recent years with either any news or from the russian a side about that, or are there any other feature project that is being discussed between the 2 countries? think it's a for you to show us for a call you everything is going according to the plan. it's all going according to the timeline. we're seeing the deadlines next. a lot of people are working in the construction to the workers are being engaged from the 30th because there's a lot of construction work being done and send you more specialist or working. the

names are coming up for st. close of the turkish government for the conditions that we're providing for this work to it is coming to the 1st 2 units being finalized. however, it's ongoing according to the plan on all these insured. so as for hydrocarbons, i can repeat actually, incidentally, we're not just building this patient the power plant. we're also building town. we're prepared to take over this fact. we will go a little, creating the fuel system and get a new sphere of economy in energy of turkey and present, or the one has made a strategic choices of tools. and i think it's quite a right when we do, it helps get rid of the hydrocarbon dependency as well. so we have a reliable partnership. we're doing our work. we're going to send the cost for the gas to gas center. he has to be working on it as well, or guns, the we're thinking about it. we've got 2 problems with both have issues with other partners. i'm sure i'll try to explain, but it's, it's not just this gas storage or gas water supply. it's an operation center, it's a trade in gas for

a year upfront maryland. what i want to point the following thing out. so you've seen well regarding the flu stream that leads to the 30th to the black sea and then provide searcy was yes, as well as the turks stream. it provides gas to europe as well. from the point. now we have to guard sol. so these pipelines that go down the bottom of the black student who's the premium armed forces are making attempts to strike them and to destroy them sooner at least the ships that are guarding them or constantly being attacked. and quite recently, the latest thing that happened, i think 7 or 8 days ago, ukrainian drones made an attempt to attack a gas pumps and stations situated on the shore of the black sea and is pumping gas to turkey. incidentally, we'd like to point it out to you. we have a turkey, it has some cooperation with ukraine at the same time frame is trying to destroy the gas pipelines, to providing gas to turkey, where this is not a joke. not an exaggeration here to drones were jammed by the russian electronic, more furnitures,

and they were trying to strike the gas company and stations on the black shores. i'm not inventing something, it's here. so that's what happened. please inform our friend president 31 and you know that's what's happening in reality in the ships that are guarding this gas transportation system. that is at the bottom of the blacks, are constantly attacked by the drones, by the water, drones that are procured by the european countries to france, incidentally. and they were attacking our bows, their guardian, these 2 pipelines issues who could throw in the who didn't. i think we need to speak with you to be more vocal about it and to be more clear thoughts. but as for propaganda that are spanish, french complained so much about some are not always succeeding when you come to, but that's what's really happening all the time. cleaning with the bilateral relations and we are developing rather successfully and we do in our tre, it is growing to you soon. however, i'm taking a look at what's happening for some new and it seems to me that be economic part of the government of turkey. recently has been focusing on receiving investments and loans, savings rants from the western financial institutions. probably

a solid right and maybe all right. the way you see, if it will have limitations on trays and economic ties with russia has stomach cramps at the loss for the turkish economy. will be greater than the game. somebody who took. and i think that there is such a possibility. but it's a sensitive matter. maybe it requires a separate discussion. we're just simply looking at the figures, all the macro economic indicators. they require special attention from the turkish government right now. but i don't want to go into detail on that. so i know them very well, and i'm very well read on that. i know what's happening in their protein, you know, as you can go to a to when we want to try with doug mustang. i got those, i'm the stuff. thank you so much mr. president. than you have given me a valuable opportunity to ask you a question right now in the far eastern region there and menu and the letters that are of concern for japan 1st, and most of that, that's the territorial,

this dispute will shift to the 2nd military cooperation communication between russia and the north korea that is being springfield right now. these 2 issues that we're facing in japan as for territorial disputes, go to the doctor and the territorial issues. my question is, if all in subarus this year, you said you will absolutely travel to these 4 and disputed curious islands. do you have any specific plans and a timeline for that visit to uh see what do you think the newsletter see what the situation right now is that the negotiations put on hold? let me get hughes. this is these territories, and then i will bye. let those relations to do something to be fully owned to farms . yet again, if you could please share. oh, my god, what are your plans that regard as for russian, japanese dogs who knew and there was

a great establishment during the time of this special military operation. and you say these negotiations were discontinued. i know conway and since then they sold the descendants of the former unless i consider citizens of that and those islands and cannot go back to visit to the grace of sarah forey. father, and some relations with japan were developing rather sustained. your matter on thing. cut out a sigh. so of course they were not many issues, especially the ones that must be guarded. 16 issues, you know, relations that is peace treaty unless the machine is cheap one year to do in our relations with japan, we're developing in a rather sustained manner. of course, there were many issues, especially the ones that regard to the key issue in organizations. that is the

piece of truth, understandably so this pc could not have been cheated without solving the issues that had to go with and to realize it was fully aware of that. back in the fifty's . and you and i know it very well. the soviet government decision, i think it was done in 1956, the declaration was signed. that was to be union is prepared to transfer to the aisles. so it out of the chain of island and the basis for that wasn't mentioned to be here, reasoning for that was swinging. his sovereignty was also not mentioned in some other condition. possibly the payments were not mentioned, however, but the very idea of a transfer was stipulation was in that declaration for a more over it was ratified by the supreme council of the ussr. for some reason, the japanese side refused to implement these agreements, pens the soviet union. also the ratified that our requests of the japanese side. we went back to the review of these matters. it was

a complex dialogue. still it took place. now you've mentioned several issues visiting the aisles of which a russian federation believes that this is a part of the sovereign territory of russia. therefore, i don't see why i should shy away from disobedience one of the territories of the russian federation. number one second removed, why do we believe that it was because there were relevant documents that were signed in the united states as well by 2 delegations of the 2 countries. it was one of the results of the 2nd world war, and the results of the 2nd world war are not to be resides. it doesn't mean that there were no opportunities to increase. this is a very delicate matter. however, it's not a black and white issue. it's more complex, but we're not shy to gauge and the dialogue on this matter to show so. so 1st i see no grounds for me that would prevent me from visiting the aisles for to be honest. so far, i have not had that in my plan is because currently i'm looking into other matters that i see for you just said that my visitor there would entail difficulties in

drafting a peace treaty, toyota, to serve. what about japan's declaration? that is joining the attempts of securing russian strategic distribution to the part of that? does it constitute a barrier in the way of negotiations? some of these treat japan has joined the cause to carry out a strategic defeat against russia. do you think that is a good strategy to pursue when striving for a peace treaty? do you think my hypothetical intention to visit the aisles is more serious than japan's japanese government? declaration of its intent to secure rushes strategic the fees on the battlefield? i do understand that this is not your personal question. it's been dictated by the editorial policy of your news agency. certainly be aware of. i think you should ask your leadership. that question sure was more over. we see that japan is biased as far as the ukraine prices is concerned, as of now, because currently you're no conditions in place for russian japan and continue

their dialogue on a peach tree. we do not refuse to engage in such a dialogue, but only once the requisite conditions have been created, especially from the japanese site. we're not doing anything in our bilateral relations that would complicate our dialogue with japan, not a single thing. everything that has been done has been done by japan. now moving on to rushes, relations with north korea, with a dpr k can be different views in that regard. i think the dpr k has on multiple occasions that demonstrated its willingness to achieve an agreement. in particular with the us, and i think that's precisely this willingness that served as the impetus for the meeting between former us president donald trump. and mr. kim jo, on the way to be more over the americans and the north koreans agree that the latter were not going to carry out new dealer tests. there was an agreement on shutting down and utility testing site. and that had to be reciprocated by some steps by the us in the banking sector. but it was not just an agreement,

this agreement was implemented. what do we do? what did happen as a result of the us and unilaterally violating these agreements, doing that directly and we work with the teachers. so what would prevent us from developing relations with the country with which we share and wondering if i was, you know, there are some things that make me ask questions during and it's in the past. we supported some measures with regard to north korea. in particular, in the field of labor migration to us, you all work in the information for you. so if you are immersed in this material, hasn't worked well versed in this field. so why did we support these measures? what about labor migrants? what kind of a threat do they? we allegedly care about the environment, some birds, and some sea animals. and what about people dying of hunger? not because they are bellicose or belligerents, the civilians, a peaceful citizens of the country. we're talking about. we prevent them from getting the job limit their opportunities in terms of securing the job to feed their families. that's just bizarre. well,

i'm just currently speaking in an abstract fashion. i am not in any relation to what currently is happening. i think that this is what's going to keep happening across the world. and if anyone is threatening, someone is threatened and they have to respond. sort of have there been no threat in the 1st place and then the difficulties would simply not arise. i think the new feeler issue is response to these constant threats. now, as for our relations with no actually uh, i can tell you that we will pursue this relationship because they are neighbors, whether others like that or not. it's almost a rule of thumb to use shawanda, so about the tune as the preferred out so that we all continue our conversations in your statements engine us use big website shows. you've also spoke about sometime around succession to the trying to accomplish organizations where us do the brakes as a c shuttle and meeting with you to kind of treating them as well. my question is

as follows, what's your view of the future? we'll do that and, you know, given the design as well as different independent countries, do you think monopoly is going to be preserved as well as the multi path as you need for the well meant to be true. but essentially, you know, we have spoken about that on many occasions. if that i, you know, that better than any one of the ussr collapse as well as well, it was dissolved whether it was destroyed or not. that's for speculation. what had happened? and only one superpower remained to minutes, thought it could rest on its laurels at the helm of the whole world, dictating their will to everyone the world is a complex system is developing rapidly with new was emerging from one of the western european politicians. and it was not meaning, i want everyone to understand that he said we will all europeans countries in our small countries. but not all of them have come to realize that yet. look at asia

and its development, basically china, 1500000 people. india has probably overtaking that in terms of population. the other asian countries are developing that frequent pace in southeast asia and bangladesh. more pakistan, indonesia, and you see sure the pace of development is enormous. the population is growing. and judging by that, the trends points to a shift in development pattern towards asia. currently, there are several processes that put in that part of the world. they're catching up in terms of economic produce and also catching up in the standards of living. this will inevitably result in a shift in the world configuration. as of right now, it's impossible to talk about any kind of monopoly being done. the monopoly is no longer there without a doubt which way the world can exist in its diversity. it has to, if complete monopolies achieved, it's going to be terrible. just as in nature, human and politics, the world needs to be a diverse place here. i don't know whether that's a good thing for the us. i mean,

such a monopoly that emerged after the collapse of the ussr because that required additional efforts on the part of the us. just have a look at the statistics. totally. the us defense, the expenditure disappear to that of all the other countries defense, the expenditure combine orders, and so you can sum up all the defense expenditures of all countries across the world. news is still going to be inferior to the defense expenditure of us because loads of money are funneled into supporting form basis. very often i get the question, how can you support the establishment of such modern web injuries, such as a gliding bottoms of the auburn guard system? the thing is, we're concentrating our financial and administrative resources in key areas where the us needs to spend a whole lot of money supporting. it's already expansive on forces across the world . and it's 4 and basis, you know, corruptions flaring, this and the expenses are great. i'm not accusing anyone. we've got

a lot of corruption to see that there's also a lot of corruption in the us because a lot of money can be stored when it's allocated for supporting what's there? a lot of money, a lot of resources are fund on supporting the imperial status of the us to doesn't benefit the american citizens. and i don't think so. on the contrary, we should have pushed us down the ladder. and the ex person with us know that i may say and point that out topically. i read them. the question is how fast is that happening? and how fast is the us going to be thrown? if they were smart people, they would read what they're experts right, and they would correct the course and then they would have stayed on the olympus for long. however, their current leadership would like to hold onto this imperial standing at any cost . and that is only detrimental to themselves. still, the changes are taking place with their unavoidable. they're already underway. there is no unipolar world, which is any more. i think that the task for all of us,

the united states, russia, bureau, asia, and that is just that. so that we would have an understanding of all of it would not come to an extreme what our colleague from the u. k. spoke about persistence. and for us to understand that and to moderate our invasion and not try to agree with each other and not to try to make someone at band and the dream is in the world, will change without possible catastrophe research that are so scary for every one of which and was a menu sort of the ambush them today. well, go ahead and get another question that the i a, a issued a document i guess the sign up for public colorado considering that right now, little rod. considering that the u. s. is definitely out of a nuclear deal and size but disappeared. size and dazzling deals was the task with adopted, yet it from again. and i think a lot of job searches, agency or a certain body should be used that would be more professional and competent as to

possibly use it as much as a web ex osborne at hand. so what do you think the situation has to do with that? and i don't know, is it around who upon your cmc up and listen to it is i just appalled right? fully executed its obligations under the well known deals that you've just mentioned. there could be no grievances against the ron in this regard to the united states, a window laterally decided to withdraw from that young and the europeans continue to demand that iran execute fully is obligations. well please forgive me now, but this is some car mention observed the ron did not step out from the deal with the former us president. it's donald trump decided to withdraw from the deal. and european said, oh yes, that's not quite right to us 6000, but you are radians. who observe it all, it's a bit. why would they do that? well, it just sounds a little sweet key actor stepped out of the deal. why went around there for the serving those commands i was, we asked to run and we try to convince,

draw not to take any action, click sudden move. so it's not to step out of the deal and not to exacerbate relations with the you're not going to say, well, i'm going to do this as an open secret. all reveal it to me. we're also asking the around in leadership to keep. com, could you say, would be even better for you to observe the agreement list, but i was thinking of myself and you must. why should it, ron? observe it if everyone is leaving the field. but in general, some kind of mechanism should be found that would be stable if it was to go. it's clear to everyone today the sign the deal to tomorrow, they leave it that it's how can we work with task force? we're always being told that trust is so important. where is the trust here? it cannot come from nowhere. one administration left and the other came in this and all their previous obligations are thrown out of the window. just like today, everyone is thinking about their own topics and i'm thinking about mind pursuant my colleagues from the united states asked about possible agreements with ukraine.

well, yes, we have come to almost signing the agreement with the printer. well, at the behest of the us and the u. k, and the way it was all thrown out. and how can we agree today and how can we negotiate today? the, to the current leadership of ukraine decided not to be elected. now it's a big question. now there's article $1.00 oh $3.00 at least screening constitution because even when it says that the president is elected for 5 years, only politically silver's article $83.00 of the printing constitution to do an image stipulates that during the martial law, the mandate of the parliament was extensive, as for the extension of the presidential mandates, well, nothing is said, nothing with that you see there is a law that explains the status of the martial law. it says that the mandate is transferred to the parliament and the elections of the president during the martial law are not being held. and the president shall elections are not being held. but it doesn't mean that the results are extended. see, it's not for the

in the late 18 ninety's french, so it is led by general. right. denise? yeah. was the goal of expanding french control in west africa to the territory of more than shot. the sonia, i mean, he stuck up some new shoes or all the cars and took shown the list to the content

of who they on the east one of the most terrific campaigns of atrocities to have ever taken place in the history of the continent. what is somebody i know the question, richard dental. hey, i'm glad you found the do. so they put the actual most likely multiple villages with devastated a numerous members of resistance groups. what the headed off that apartment is in for us to be the be a young investigator in search of his own identity and box on that you need to africa. the choices general with eyes, blood drenched roots in an effort to establish how your legacy still echoes throughout the confidence. so my name is penny and i come from england and i've come really to find out more about the, the mission, hopefully. and the history in the region, the

show room just don't you have to safe house the economy and engagement includes the trail. when so many find themselves will support. we choose to look so common ground the. i look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings except we're so shorter is that conflict with the 1st law show you alignment of the patient. we should be very careful about visual intelligence. at the point obviously is to create

a trust rather than fit the various. i mean with the artificial intelligence, we have so many with him in the a robot must protect his phone, existence was on the car. i'm rick sanchez. and i'm here to plan with you whatever you do. do not watch my new show. seriously. why watch something that's so different. whitelisted opinions that he won't get anywhere else. welcome to please or do you have the state department c i a weapons, bankers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your fax for you. go ahead. change and whatever you do. don't marshall state main street because i'm probably going to make you, i'm comfortable. my show is called direction, but again,

you probably don't wanna watch it because it might just change the wayne state on the face board in that direction of nato brings natal closer toward another before us and, and i'll tell you exclusively hon gary in florida. minnesota stresses of his country well never participates in action that would escalates the conflicts, will ukraine's bit to join nato. nate brings up a little bit closer to should age and someone's believes that it's possible to supply such weapons words zone in order to strike our territory. the response could be a symmetric. what was the most do is considering deploying westerns to regions within striking distance of countries that approve targeting russia who's, who knows as long as the full narrative politicians use to escalate.