in parliament that is done by the and elected president of the european commission and their staff. and that person is hand picked and then mary subjected to confirmation by the permit. and that parliament is still projected to be dominated by the establishment parties on both the right and the left. the kind who favor establishment, bureaucrats who make establishment friendly policy, which kind of makes you wonder what the whole point is of this charade. which seems to be little more than a game of musical chairs in the back seat of the clamor be all the day a 2 years ago, the largest on city as long as the operation and world history. so allied forces land on the shores of norman day. political leaders attended the anniversary today, including the us, presidents, welsh. i find a needed a bit of fun saying to find a safe before a photo of a seem to try to take a break and finds comfort and a try. the activity was that all the pomp and circumstance comes from it. the

allies of grace is allied. russia knows, having been invited to the ceremony. however, the west was clicked, the quote is allowed to move the landscape once again, seemingly turning a blind thought to the fox. but you train his neo nazi fights as the mountain gets rang. i'll take correspondence. dave sweeney has moved on the story. as leaders gather on the normandy beaches, rushes options will raise a few eyebrows given the que sacrifice has made for the night to enjoy the 2nd well bull. according to russia, an invite had been expected in recognition of the efforts of this, the ami, something which apparently i'm good, the white house. we would defer to the government of france, which organizes the culmination of normandy. but perhaps this will remind the russians that the actually for real nazis, one's not the imaginary ones in ukraine. russia hit back saying it's not the 1st time that the 2nd world war had been used as manipulation on political game playing by the west on

a golf at the suggestion that no not see the new crime or imagine re, given the evidence is in plain sight for to see a just weeks ago, the red carpet was rolled out by former british prime minister boris johnson. as a language praise on the far right as of vitality and in the houses of parliament. um even with us it was the 1st time to purchase establishment as being cool to find the nazis taken. charles the 3rd when he was prince charles received an owner reload degree from the university of alberta and canada. bestowed on him by the insurance law on form of off an assessment, but pieces about him. but if the neo nazis in ukraine really all fake the wanted germany, which knows that they go to about the subject,

send the group of soldiers back to display, not see symbols within the framework of training conducted by the boon, disappear for ukrainian armed forces. 7 cases were identified where soldiers were right wing extremist symbols. the training of the affected ukrainian soldiers was immediately terminated in consultation with the ukrainian armed forces and the individuals were returned to ukraine. so germany seemed to be well aware that they may have been fighting you crazy and neo nazis going so far as to tell them to hide and all the symbols a case of out of sight, out of mind, perhaps other more idea of logic, the open ukrainian neo nazis or even complaining, but they all been given west and weapons as well. come on to dennis polk, a pin code as cool for the organization to be removed from us legislation. which binds it from receiving wisdom weaponry. a hi emphasized the very existence of such amendments and prohibitions not only prevents as or from performing its comb with

commissions more effectively. but as a blow to the defense capability of our country, tarnishes the cranes image on the international level and as humiliating for the entire ukrainian army. the file has been in place, so it's a 2017 amendment stated. none of the funds made available by this act may be used to provide all training or other assistance to the as of fatality and white supremacy in new naziism are unacceptable and have no place in our world. i am very pleased at the recently passed on the bus prevents the us from providing arms and training assistance to the neo nazi is off battalion, finding a new cream. the state department should pressure key of to dissociate itself with this group and investigate whether any of our weapons or training have already been provided to them. this is just one of many reasons why lawmakers should be concerned about channeling huge amounts of weapons into this volatile conflicts on

but the spiked upon us. my good. how you doing? just seem to have made their way into the hands of the neo nazis. that's according to now deleted post on the militias website. the crazy and national god issued a statement in 2018, denying the weapons and as of possession, the special unit does not have american a t gm's in service. some media outlets have reported that the as of units of the national guard of ukraine is armed with american javelin, a t gm's, and p s. r l grenades launches. we would like to inform you that the as of special forces unit, which is part of military unit $3057.00, does not have the above mentioned weapons. so it seems that they are not say, you know about to very all through north, according to the united states, nor is leading. i like germany to send them back to you. cried it, but hop, see, i see it on the verse or your dad. i should in fact stand as a reminder, the russia for the nazis then is doing the same against the idea of logical

successes today is always great to have a company here in nazi international as well for me today, my colleague, you to know now will behave with all the very latest in just on the same with the delivery i went on, that's what i said. i'll be very short. tomorrow we're going to celebrate the eighty's anniversary us of the day of the us and french soldiers. they fought together with russian soldiers and associates soldiers that do, do you, can you rule out that right now russians, french and the us can work together and be partners it to and you can see, you know, we cannot rule that out. it's the us and europeans who are rolling that out,

were all for it. we did not introduce any sanctions against europe. we did not discontinue providing energy to europe to germany. we are being sanctioned here. you said that tomorrow they're going to celebrate 80 year anniversary of the day of the disarmament in normandy. we have always held our allies in the greatest esteem, both the americans, the british, the french, incidentally, do they know and france that it was stolen, who insisted on francis presents and not just presents. but also in frances sign in the capitulation act with germany. both the us and the u. k. were against that, it was stolen, who insisted on france as being there is a victory country. when the pact on unconditional surrender was signed with germany, the french do not remember. maybe they do not want that, or maybe they do not think much of it. but it's a historical fact. something we've preserved in our archives, we've always had great respect for france that was fighting and resisting despite

german troops marching from paris. we supported the marquis and also the normandy newman pilots and opened our doors. our doors are always open to talks to negotiations and discussions. you've just mentioned that, but it says if we're not welcome at that holiday, as it were, how many americans died in the 2nd world war? 500000. and even fewer british citizens died. the numbers lower than that of those who died during the 1st world war, the biggest sacrifice and the altar of this victory was made by the soviet union. according to the latest calculation, around 27000000 people, out of them around 70 percent, from the russian socialist federation of the soviet republic. russia accounts for 70 percent of those losses. they're asking whether we're willing or not willing, but no one has invited us. the biggest contribution to the feeding naziism and it's evident you have to simply read churchill, you know,

the biggest contribution comes from the soviet union on the biggest contribution to the shared victory over naziism. and everyone knows that only the most dishonest people are trying to distort these historical facts. okay, let them be, let them celebrate without us which we, you know, it's not going to do as much damage. but they're saying that the current leadership of ukraine is going to be there right now. but just listen, how can you celebrate such an important anniversary in the fight against naziism together with those who are putting the neo nazis on a pedestal, making national heroes out of them. so 1st the current symbol of ukrainian statehood is been dara. who is one of the major henchmen of hitler and the territory of eastern europe and it was through the hands of band rates. the thousands of russians and poles and jews were shot dead. she was the closest accomplice of hitler. yeah, at the end of the war, he sniffed on the wind that victory was escaping from the clutch of hitler. and he started to search for new allies in the west. and the germans took note of that.

but he was the main collaboration just. and he threw a hand salute welcoming the nazis, and he was directly collaborating with them back then he was still legitimate. and the head of ukraine applauded. standing a former nazi at the canadian parliament. do you know about that? of course everyone knows about that. but the media of the west europe, the us and canada were trying to keep it all hush. even though it was a person who fought against the allies during the 2nd world war. and everyone stood up and applauded the person who, as they said, had fought against russia and who did fight against russia during the 2nd world war . it was hitler and his allies. so the man who got that standing ovation was a former soldier and tomorrow, the very same people are going to celebrate the day. what are we to make of that? and especially given the fact that russia is the successor state of us sr that

suffered such heavy losses. well, there seemed to invite that. okay, we'll survive that. but you know, that answers your question about who is interested in rebuilding relation and who is not. we are all in favor viewed originally, but my question also require regards ukraine still you, if you cannot tell us the number, the loss of the russian military servicemen in the training and during the conflict, this is the rest of it. if it's the only thing that is of interest to you, i say that usually no one talks about it. and if they talk about it, then generally they distort the real figures. now i can tell you with full confidence that our losses, especially if it regards well. unfortunately, your repairable losses there many times smaller than the ukrainian side. and that can tell you the number of people and the prisoners of war are soldiers and officers that have been held captive. 1348 people. i know these figures because

we're working with them every day. and quite recently, there was an exchange of 75 people on each side because ukrainian soldiers that were holding 6465, if we talked about it repairable losses, i mean the dead. and i think it's the same ratio one to 5. so that's our logic here . that is why they're trying to conduct a total dropped and ukraine because the losses in the battlefield are tremendous. you know, we think that our calculations are that the ukranian army is losing about $50000.00 people per month. these are all casualties, so i think there are a 50 to 50 ratio of a reversible every terrible losses and injuries. the total draft that is being held right now does not solve this issue. nevertheless, according to our data from different sources, about $30000.00 per month are being drafted, conscripted whether it's foss draft or not. well, they are not that many volunteers right now. so i think last month they drafted about $50.00 to $55000.00, but it does not solve the issue. why?

because this draft just covers the losses. it's all just to repair the losses. it's a major issue that leads to the lowering of the draft age. now they've lowered it from 27 to 25 years, and we simply know it, well, it's an open secret and there are basically no secrets there and ukraine. the administration of the us is insisting on a stage by stage lowering of the conscription age from 23 to 20, to 18, or to 18 years straight away. because right now they're asking 17 year olds, 17 year old males to be put on the military register, and we know it for sure. that's the demand by the us administration. it's a demand to the ukraine in leadership. if we can think that they're still leadership after the elections were canceled, i've recently spoken publicly about that. i think when i met the press, when i left who is becca stand after a visit there. and i think that the us administration will indeed make the current

ukrainian leadership make this decision to lower the drafting age to 18 years. and they later would get rid of zalinski 1st. that needs to be done because this is a very difficult matter. a law must be adopted, certain steps must be taken. now we're in june 2024. and to do that all of it. i think it would take a year. so until spring the beginning of the next year, she will be tolerated. when's the landscape? does it off? they will waive him good bye and will change. i think there are several candidates now, but it has to do with tremendous losses. $50000.00 is the most mot calculations. $50000.00 is what we see on the battlefield. and if you take into account that there are certain losses that well, we know that they're there, but we cannot confirm them because they're happening at the homefront. they're still tremendous losses. i mean, what i do from that is the ottoman, we used to have the a journalist. i'm not sure we didn't on the 9th of may 2000 and it's, we died in,

in ukraine. we think that he died after the german strikes is we think the francis conducting investigation and they're saying that the drone that killed him came from russia. well that's, that's my question. but the ministry of justice, your friends would like to conduct investigation. we'd like to conduct investigation. is russian prepared to cooperate with france? so we would not would truly happen. it was a major tragedy for us, for our agency because the, you know, and she was divide by family who was 32. remodeling was 320. so we, we like to have some closure, some kind of serious investigative work done to know what happened with russia take part in that with them, or just and competitive menu. cuz then yeah, because of it,

you know, we've never refused to take part in investigations. do you know how many journalist died in the world zone? do you remember dmitri, at least 30 journalist, died, are journalist died there, and no one has given an opportunity to investigate what happened to them is that's number one. number 2, if we talk about what's happening in a new crane, they're in jail, in prison, in the key of regime. an american journalist was tortured to death. but i'm like, you, the united states are not even asking what happened to him. he was an american citizen, a journalist, who was captured at the border, dragged into j ill and he died there. he said he was tortured to death. that's what happened. it's not a figure of speech, but no one asked what truly happened to him. and despite that, we're prepared to organize this investigation. i don't quite know how to put it into practice because of a person died in the war zone then. well, still, we can do everything in our power for that history. so in the for today,

the relations between, as a bridge on and russia on developing, in an upward trend and recent visit of presidents to live to moscow, gave a chance not only to celebrate and memorable anniversary, 50 years of the bomb railroad, but also to discuss bilateral relations, what's your take on the future? i would look for bi level cooperation. and in particular, the development of, of the transportation cord or north south a machine you, instead of do it, says are relations are developing successfully and reliably internet pragmatic fashion we, we feel the stance of us are by john, which is building our interest state relations based on mutual interests, so, and also there is an element of mutual sympathy because otherwise it wouldn't be possible to explain the presence of $300.00 schools in russian language in azerbaijan. children are being taught in russian. and i know that president ali is,

is fully supporting the study of the russian language in us or by john. and we can see that in all aspects in aust, fears which tell us that the leadership of other bodies on believes that the russian language is going to be something that as they are citizens are going to need. and they will need that language for further developing our bilateral tides, which are developing our trade stance at $4.00 us dollars. and the pace of this development is very good, very steady, and we're increasingly diversifying our relations. i am confident that we should manage to reserve these good intentions on both sides in russia. we share those intentions, then the outcomes are going to be great. of course there's still a lot that needs to be done and you are absolutely correct and saying that we need to further develop the logistics, not just the north south court or, but also there are other dimensions on that such as setting up logistics hubs at

the very russian border at the deca stanny stretch where the works are currently underway, and it also applies to other directions. we have quite a big number of students studying at russian university's receiving scholarships from the budget. and we see there is a very big interest and receiving further education as far as the north south court or is concerned, it can turn into an international route which is in high demand. because right from here, cargo shipments from the port of st. petersburg can flow through the european part of russia, then on to us or by john, and then onwards to the coast of the gulf, maybe 10 days or so faster than if they were to go through the suez canal. but i'm not saying anything bad about the soon as canal. it's very good for the world trade . but this new trade route would be an additional route, a very good one for shipping goods from the north to the south, and vice versa. 10 days faster. because this will help us save a lot. this is a very good route, but there still is a lot that needs to be done. we're working on both sides. i am aware that the

president supports this project. we've spoken with him about that on many occasions, the leadership of ron is also in support of this project and says this project promises to be very beneficial. but there are other foreign investors that have expressed their interest in that route and not even regional investors, but investors from say, other sovereign wealth funds of error countries because they're always searching for a possibility to invest money in reliable endeavors that are still issues that need to be studied further, in particular, what stretches and where and how they're going to be funded. is it going to be based on a loan, or is there going to be direct funding from russia? and how is this going to fit in with the streams that are going to head westwards across the territory of us? or by showing that we need to finalize some issues with our running and friends and partners. whether it's going to be a narrow gauge or a wide gauge road. i mean, the one that's going to be built on the territory of your on. but the crux of the

matter is everyone is determined to implement this project. we've set up the director at the to be is the organization responsible for that? i am confident that we will complete this project with you. well, it's going to take some time. there are some issues about funding and share, but this is not the only project we are pursuing together. apart from that officer by john is a caspian state. it's one of the 5 caspian states, and that means that we've got many joint interest, some apply to the environment of the caspian sea. the do you put your junk of mr. president? presently, you have conducted a state visit to china when you have quite close relations with china. this can be cited as a model for building relations between you may dial us. what's your take on the current state of cooperation between russia and china. it

says, well, as far as our bilateral relations go, i would like to tell you that they are not short term relations. they are based upon fundamental principles for 15 years, china has been our major trade partner. so we started to build our relations and we propelled it to the current level, not pursuing some short term fleeting goals that come and go day in and day out. we decided to pursue this relationship based on mutual interest in a con, gradual fashion here. and i can tell you that we are making sewage headway. currently our bilateral trade has exceeded our expectations. it's $240000000000.00 us dollars. according to the chinese statistics. initially, we assessed that number at 230000000000 according to our statisticians as well. but it's not just about our trade. our trade is about being diversified and quite successfully to boot. and it's not just about hydrocarbons or hydro power, but they're also supplies of oil and coal in energy. we're also building nuclear

power plants in the people's republic of china and doing that quite successfully. all of that is happening, but we're also cooperating and high tech and we've got very good prospects. i refer in particular to aviation to a i, you know, we're happy here. we celebrate china successes in different domains. in particular . it's space exploration. there are some unique achievements we're talking about and then the communist party of china is the leading political force in china. everything that's done over there is done under the guidance of the communist party of china. and that's something i would like to draw your attention to. i said that i don't know whether i said that in this format and whether that's going to be interesting to you. but there are some experts in russia, very good economists, quite young people, i'll be already very experienced that they say that the analysis of what's happening in china is the economy and the analysis of what's happening in other economies across the world, including the leading economies such as the us show that china has succeeded in

building sufficient, i'll be a peculiar economic model that might even be more efficient than the one that the us has. and judging by the results, the economy of china is demonstrating. this is something we can agree on. yes, there might be some discussion of some western partners of ours that say chinese economy is not entirely based on the market. there are regulations by the party, but the outcome is out there for everyone to see. and it shows that this model is more efficient and the chinese leadership needs to think about every since in each and every citizen. and not all of them live on the same level as an average european or american citizen. so it's up to the leadership of china to take the decisions that will allow them to see, to the needs of the vital needs of chinese citizens. and all of that is done thanks to a good friend of mine and the leader of china. president, gigi and ping of to they are cheating great successes doing that reliably and steadily. and we can only be happy for them. we're aware of everything that's

happening in the world is leaving economies, including china's economy. chinese economy is generally very reliable and it's becoming increasingly based on high technology. and i think it's a huge mistake on the part of the us and number of european countries. they're trying to somehow stymied or bring down the piece of the chinese economy. because i think in order for them to be successful, they would need to fit those processes to integrate them rather than trying to obstruct them. some very smart people say that china is over producing cars and also over producing electric cars, who's seen such things. it's those who believe themselves to be proponents of the market does not, don't they know who decides whether there is an over production or not. it's up to the market to the size of the city of china, produces a certain number of cars and all of that is consumed and absorbed by the market. what kind of an over production are we talking about? but it's just nonsense. is it possible to call that an over production is no,

that's not called that it's called an attempted stymie in the growth through non market means. and that is harmful in particular to the us economy. and why is that? you're not taking goods from china. these goods are those goods, will it result in themselves producing something? no, it will produce them and having to buy from elsewhere. and this is going to be more expensive. this will result in a higher inflation rate and the higher inflation rate is going to have in the various impact upon the economic structure of the country. there's doing such things and it's going to be harmful in this particular case to the economy of the us. it's an air mistake yet another one. you had another mistake of the current administration of the us. as for china, yes, they have very professional guidance by presidency, and they are moving ahead at a very good pace. and there are other fields, and i've always spoken about them. and i can tell you that our cooperation in the international arena is a motivating factor and also a source of civility. you know,

we conducted exercises and we're going to continue conducting exercises, including military exercises with them. were also engaged military and technical cooperation. and we've got a lot to offer our chinese friends. and there's an interest on china side in this kind of cooperation or cooperation is not confined either to economic or to military technical cooperation or to international cooperation. you might think this year we have proclaimed across the years of culture and our moderator, you know, said that, you know, russian songs, you speak russian. and i think this is just as important as the rest i've just spoken about. because that leaves the foundations of relationships between the people's increase of favorable environment for personal relations across all other sectors. and this is something we'll strive to stick with hands for. and i am hopeful that we will be able to meet with president she and speak about all these issues. and i hope will be able to meet within the framework of the su oh and the

bricks, organization the oh, what else seemed wrong? just don't you have to shave house and engagement because the trail when so many find themselves will support we choose to look so common ground the the what is part of the the

employee would post good isn't the defense you of us and bidding the word or is it something deeper, more complex might be present? let's stop without collisions. let's go. part of the, on

the face board in the direction of nato, brings natal closer to the award and never before. in an rti exclusive, the hon gary and foreign minister, a stress is that his country will never participate in actions that would escalate to ukraine conflict. i think that keeps faith to join. nato only brings the block closer to war. also a head should lead if someone believes that it's possible to supplies such weapons to a war zone in order to strike our territory. the response could be a symmetric lot of our potent warrants at moscow is considering the following arms to regions within striking distance of countries that supply weapons which key uses the target russia, the country's leader, also slum what he called a false.