is deleon's and indignant to that that goes on, documented people are not aware how solid and strong and durable these people are. and are, you know, i know it's quite difficult to speak about this, your and right in the midst of a genius. i tell you know what all, you know, my people and i know that they would recover from this and they are not going to lose this war because this war is about their very existence. and they're very collective. thank you for coming on. i'm sharing that with us. of again, i say something very personal to you. dr. rumsey borrowed palestinian american journalists, an editor of the policy 9 product, and we appreciate your time. next star t. so it's time for an exclusive interview with the president of a rock of dual latifah. she does not hold back against desire to see a palestinian state established. you can watch the folds, especially the

the, the, for the funding of the month us about the latest events in the ukraine. secretary general of nato mystery solved sumburgh suggested that to be that you can be given an opportunity to try and refreshing ottoman k territory using the weapons procured from the inquiry from new york. somebody will be in countries if weighed with is no changes including the united states and not all of them. um, but the united states are also close to still some countries that housing discussions about sending smelled your instructors and counselors here that i'd

like to ask you to comment on these 2 decisions on what will be in the restroom response to that. thank you. this is this because it has fun counselors and instructors and their presence there. there's nothing new new they are already present this on the ukrainian territory. unfortunately for them, you know, they're incurring losses. i know that for sure. and they're not being targeted specifically what it just happens is nice, but the european countries in the united states prefer to keep that silent little here in a 2nd layer that's per high precision, long range weapons you. i think we need to break this topic down into to get a 1st a conventional arms multiple launch rockets, systems of 70 kilometer range or so mystical, please been used for very long time. but it was indeed the cranium service mentioned. do that on their own. now, as for high tech, modern, high precision, precision guided the long range weapons, such as the storm shadow of u. k, were attack ends of the us. it was over the french missiles as well, and it bears repeating. and since i've said it before, when i traveled

a central asian country here, so the attack them is to 300 kilometer range and how they use suits and how are they transfer? okay, as well. so they've transferred the missile system here it was given by the pentagon, inside the us. how is it used to pursue premium service? main cannot independently conduct the striking with dismissal, understands their technologically incapable of doing that, you know, for that they require satellite reconnaissance intelligence. i'm sure and based on that intelligence data, this is us, the satellite intelligence they need to put in the flight travel from the flight mission of the missile. and later put it into the missile system in the service and standing there to the message. it looks like he's doing that simply automatically and then we, he's just pushing the button was to, he might not even know what happens next. these to killing what could be the participation of ukrainian service macbook and he's not those who are typing the buttons but higher the then they can choose the target and they can say, what's the priority target for them? because what they do is not decide whether to strike this target or not. because

yet again, the flight mission of the missile is basically typed in only by those we're providing the weapons to if it's attack comes. and if it gets done by the pentagon, you, so the storm shadow that's done by the u. k. it's even simpler sometimes because the flight mission is typed in automatically without the service man on the ground . it's done automatically by the u. k. then i say, because i, when the bonus were officers were thinking whether it's right the crime in bridge and or any other facilities. well, they were thinking for themselves, right? but it wasn't done for them to get an issue. that's what they were going to do in the same applies to the french specialist resort is done by the western specialist . therefore, we foster no allusion about that. usually the proof of, well, how are we to respond when most of the naturally will improve our anti missile defense systems? air defense systems will destroy these incoming missiles. so you might do just a 2nd. we're thinking that if someone believes it possible to provide such weapons the military to the war zone and in order to conduct strikes against our territory,

we think 3 issues for us. then why don't we have an opportunity to provide the same class of weapons to those regions of the world where the strikes will be conducted agent sensitive facilities of those countries who are doing that against russia. and therefore, the response might be a symmetrical. and we will think about that you put a key to number 3, such actions, well, with deteriorated, live, change the situation for the worse, and they will continue to deteriorate the international situation. this ends under my international security. in the end, we see that such countries are engaged in the war against the russian federation. and that is a direct participation in the war against the russian federation teaches. we leave ourselves the right to respond the same way. it's a path towards very serious issue. this will be done so much as the president given us into the action was both president trump and the president. by doing, can you give us a quote you to a perspective and your view?

which one do you think would be the most favorable candidate for a, you know, to us, and the russian relations given the ongoing war or that is going on and you can now i've already spoken about that and everyone perceive my statement about president biden with a smirk so to speak and that they saw some kind of hidden critique of president by, well indeed, he's an old school politician and the fact that he didn't like it into a certain extent he started to attack me to but well, i knew that what happens is that means that i was right, and he's predictable to him that only confirms our notions about what i've talked about. but in general, we don't really care because president trump ex president tron with you, who's accused of being a spy for russia. and we know that's just pure nonsense, just garbage, just an element of domestic and political infighting between democrats and republicans, and baseless ridiculous accusations against trump sooner. well,

we have always perceived that as an element of domestic vickery and in for, in the united states that was later confirmed during the national investigation in the us. and there were no connections with president trump is never exist. however, what remains of factors actually during his presidency, he started to introduce massive sanctions against the russian federation with whom he left the intermediate near to their forces. treating that was that happened during his president. so, and i'm speaking very sincerely now that we believe, and if we thinking that some scene will change in the us policy regarding russia to say, we don't think that anything will change because no serious changes will take place some time. i mean, you know, what's happening in the united states, you know, what fully, well, what happens during the political inside when they're burning themselves from the inside and much of their political system, their state on this. and i have to say whether it's pleasant or not. and there are legend leadership and democracy, they're also bringing to the ground because it is apparent to the rest of the world that the prosecution of trust,

especially in court. and the allegations that happened due to events that happened years ago without direct approved. well, this is we currently use in the corporate system for political purposes. it's apparent to us here in russia, and i'm sure that can be seen in the u. k as well. and then the rest of the world can see that as well. and most importantly, these things out of the united states as well. because after a well known decision of the court was a jury gave a guilty verdict to prove, well, this is purely using the court system for political purposes. we all know that the rating and the ranking of president trump grew by 6 percent right away, i think, and donations to his election campaign also increased because it's what does it tell us? it tells us that the people in the us do not believe the court system, the justice system of the united states when it makes such decisions and believes that they're politically motivated. maybe it's counterintuitive. you wouldn't form policies in domestic policy and an economic policy as well. and then i think that

today's administration or conducting one mistake after another. and sometimes i get surprised at what's happening and therefore we're watching it from the side. we've never interfered. and the domestic politics of the united states, and we do not intend to do it, but we'll see what will happen when you bought it will lead to elect wrap up my answer with what i began with the end result. and as we believe he does not have a great significance, we'll work with any president elected by the us. people see should the, you don't think anything would change in terms of the support for you grateful to get in or if tom comes, but you don't think that to be a change to this because it's hard to say. i don't think i can make it clear cut conclusion, whether something will change or not. i think we'll need to take a look at the priority of the future administration to if the future administration is or will follow the national interest. and if they think that the national interest will be to stabilize the situation within the country, not to federal immigration to consolidate

a society within the united state of stuart, to amend the mistakes that led to tremendous stature and inflation within the us to then that surely following the domestic national interest, if they would follow them, then it would pursue the goals of global liberals. and that i think is destroying the united states from the inside. but he's very well they strive to be the leader of global liberally. some of them will know, but if they follow the national interest, then maybe there could be some changes in the foreign policy towards russia and towards the conflict in new crane and sophisticated. but remember how many gifts i mentioned to put in that case, some changes are possible, but i think you would agree with me that no one is interested in the united states in ukraine. they're interested in the mac and we have, for instance, in supremacy and leadership of the united states in the world that they don't want to allow in any kind of success by russia, or least indeed because they believe that in that case it is that will be detrimental, so the us leadership, that's the whole point of what the us is doing. i see what is the future

administration changes the priorities for itself. they would set the goal is differently to use and they would see that the essence of their work and strengthening the united states from the inside with finance, economy, ship building, normal relations in the world. more respectful towards everyone in the move in something may change. sure. i think that it depends on the sentiment in the society, and i think that the sentiment is shifting to that end to the board. and i think that if the future administration, so we'll catch that wind and their sales, then the change is possible for them to proceed with an email to the user 3 flag. they are free flags behind, you know, things like of russia, but also the soviet union, the end of the russian empire. that was the beauty solidified russian and tires and tell us why does it weighs someone suspects that we have some imperial ambitions? please imagine this will bring back the soviet union and will have it for bailey and islamic populations that ever come into your minds. you shouldn't invent anything that's not there when you were not against an increase in these lama

population. another rather happy that it happens in the russian federation now, and i'm going to need some of our per dominantly islamic republics. we have a very good birth rate us and we are very happy about the woods past is because the page has been turned. now we're looking into the future, so based on the reality of today, the flags that you see right now are part of our history and civilian. we should not invent anything, we lose these contemplation. so. so to shape your opinion about russia, those are your only harming yourself with that. imagine that russia wants to attack nato. what are you done that's know who invented that? this is garbage nonsense and nothing else. it would have been just pure garbage if they didn't try to do their populations, that they should cry will then say that russia is trying to attack us. and we need to arm ourselves and send all of our weapons to ukraine. but why is it being done? to maintain their own imperial domination in greatness. hence the threats and the scary stories are for the mores. why in germany and other parts of europe. there was no such threat and it could never be. we're just finding ourselves new frame,

might be aware of the united states over the ocean. and we're here right now at the move of imagine we would do that in canada right now. what the us is doing that our threshold right here in the ukraine or in mexico, and i see where we can see right now is that the united states now? well, back in the day, they took part of the mexican territory. and right now they can fight for the return of their territory to it. so that's what the western countries are trying to do in terms of the russian ukrainian crisis. you would have you ever considered that you shouldn't look at the flags that we should look into the crux of the matter for we have no imperial and vision. believe me, this is nonsense. we'll just like this threat of russia to nato and european countries. if we look at the potential of natal machine and the russian potential, what do you decide that we're crazy about to do? now as far as the provision of weapon jury is concerned, such as applies to conflicts so well, that is always a bad thing, especially because those who supply weapons are not simply supplying the weapons.

they're also managing the weapons and control in the good. and that is very dangerous, and a very serious step. we know that in germany does not deny that. i don't know how it got into the media, but you, you know, the generals of the end as well were discussing how and when they were to strike the crimea bridge or other facilities on the russian territory on which, including the territories which no one doubts belongs to russian to see it. when the 1st german tanks appeared on the cleaning soil with german produce tanks. because the moral and ethical shock and russia, because our relations with germany had always been very good. so they're going to see right now, you know, this talk that some missiles are going to appear that will strength russian territories. then this will fully undermine the russian german relations. we understand as a famous german political leader said after the 2nd world war and the germany has never been fully independent, it was in the precise sense of the word as fully sovereign states. we were in contact with chancellor shortly so that we had multiple meetings. i would not give

any assessment to the performance of the german government to accept to the german voters or to pass judgment on that. get back to soon the european parliament elections are coming and we'll see how it goes. you know, i still have many good friends in germany and i'm trying not, you know, to compromise them so that they don't have any problems. i try not to maintain relations right now with them. but i've known them for many years and i've known that they're reliable friends with it. and i've gotten many of those in germany, and i know the landscape and how things go and the political landscape is the cd use around 30 percent. 16 percent is the social democrats, s p d 15 percent alternative for germany, a f, d and the rest. and this is how the voters are respond to it. this shows the sentiments among german citizens who said, i mean, i understand germany's independence, the defense and security in general. yeah. i'm cognizant of their dependence on information policy because you know, whatever big media outlet you'll look at,

you'll see that the end beneficiary is some kind of american foundation. just going to be a human while i apply those american foundation so. so they're doing a great job because they have a tight driven on media landscape in germany lying low, all the while. it's very hard to stand up to that i understand. so however it for some very simple things in those thing as well as even strange that no one today and the german leadership is defending the german. interesting, yes, germany does not have the full sovereignty, but there are jeremy's and you need to think about their interest, but you might look at it. so they blew up those poor pipelines in the baltic sea. no one is even evictions about the amount as if it's the right thing to do was i'm on my not someone's dog. i think you're indeed where until the mid morning and we'll sit down to evaluate for an administrator status or the president and number of people expressed ministration. and you read a letter mention we did wait on the $10000.00 relations during the time of the

preston phrase. we'll have to do that is one of them great services of our president. he also pointed out the role played by him present for i see development, his violin relations and the regional relations. and the question that i wanted to ask you that that would be continued on the development of relations with the right . and what kind of program is planned and see where there's some agreements achieved with present pricey. what is that? and i was looking for the purchase of ron and russia in the future. one of the developing relations between rushing the rod in the steady fashion making good headway across many avenue which most russian iran happened to be under sanctions, different sanctions regime. and he was surprised when we learned recently some of the levels of technological achievement senior ron told me, we were surprised. however, our ronnie and friends had managed to preserve such a high level of production, industrial production in certain technologies, despite the sanctions hasn't been forced for many years. so we were pleasantly surprised. our trade and economic ties are developing some. we've got many joint

projects. we would like to take additional effort aimed at developing high tech and certainly taking into account the restrictions use. this is going to be difficult, but still it can be done. and this is something we're going to do. so now as for present, right, i see who is killed in this tragedy. i would like to say that we had very good notion we live on the business like relations with him to the p was a very interesting person and you know, he was a series politician, see a reliable partner. and so he possessed a great sense of irony and humor things, and it was very interesting person to talk to, nor to communicate with. not just interesting, but also useful jim circus. and i would like to say that if we achieve degrees in with him on something, then one could be a 100 percent. sure that this issue would not be lost sight of illness. but that doesn't mean that all issues have been resolved because it's not just up to the leaders that these issues depend on you what we were working together to improve and enhance our relations. as it was under president rice and ron had joined bricks and the seal,

which is testimony to the fact that we were moving together in the right direction . interested them in particular in the direction of setting up a multi polar world order in blue. and iran had continued to play a significant role in that regard. there's one thing i would like to say concluding my answer to your question about the issue. i would like to say that we're hopeful that everything that has been achieved by president rice and russian a. ronnie and relations is going to be picked up and continue. and i have no doubt that this is exactly what's going to happens is because everything we are doing, they shouldn't need spend mutual interest of a rush or any wrong savings. or we know that the iranian statehood is very stable. that the too many, we're aware how the executive and the power system in iran are organized, listed in the we know that it's not just the president and his colleagues who worked on for mazda, because you see the supreme leader is also playing the significant role in that regard station and so we're waiting for the elections of the next president capital . and i look forward to meeting the new president over on different international events,

including the shanghai cooperation organization and the brand was assigned to it. and i'm confident that we will find common ground and we'll follow up on these projects whose foundations were laid by the late president vices, and millions of people around the world are opposing the attacks against the guys and people which is amount to the level of genocide right now, and what's russia has a way for his intent to play that role in the solution of the situation right now, having gaza and do you have any intention to also get the security council in motion? and because of the people, not only the guys and people about the posting and people in general and the people off a different origins, religion at the city, and in free from any identity and background and the people of the world are actually asking for the big powers to finish what is

happening right now on the ground in a 1000. thank you here to extinguishers because it's, well, the 1st thing i want to say is that we're certainly against terrorism in all its forms and we're against attacks and the civilian population in any place in any countries. but what we're seeing today and gaza in response to the well known terrorist attack in israel does not look like a war. it looks like a total destruction of the civilian populations from goods. i can only reiterate russia's official position, easiest thing with the, in this be result of the united states policies, which moved away all the tools that had been a created for attempting to collective solutions. this problem may be somewhat of the us administration, decided that you have the option to do, but the process will be set up for the experience as showing michelle, this is not true, but it isn't in resolving this issue. so i just providing material resources is also not a promising endeavor on that. but when you mentioned this,

a solution to political questions such as the fate of the palestinian people. and it's a store of the prospects cannot be solved by per writing some economic handouts. of course, it is a necessary component to create an environment where a solution can be found, but you must address the political question. and the main political question for revolves around the creation of the palestinian state. the 2 state solution was a mandated by the human decision to go so that the house is gonna be a states to co exist with the jewish state. so without addressing the key issues result in the substance of this problem would not be positive, but then the russian position here is principal and it does not depend on the current situation. but this has been standing since the soviet times. we know that president or the one is making energetic efforts to achieve a solution because it is a difficult problem, looks and considering his high authority in the region like this and in the world, in the as lama coiled. first of all, 5 cases is making

a significant contribution in russia and they might, sparks is willing to do everything again to help solve this. let's see, especially considering the relations that you've achieved with the state of israel over recent decades. so, so to give a place a bus, who knows what has been going on for 8 months to try me to set the all set to on stuff onto the gets home us. yes. you know, it's do that. so how do you see the scenario? how do you see a got this confidence unfolding and given your diploma to you know, the nations of cloud was depressed, you know, sort of g was home us even with the is the, i don't know is it's a bit strange. but with gunfire guns these jews think of playing a leading role in it in uh, getting an end to the conflict based on a 2 state solution as of a difficult for us and do the. but he said that his whole for the policy and state this is one and then you could assume there is whole use in particular due to the

fact the dose in the us. and then israel, there are people who advocate for a 2 state solution you, unless there are people there who believe that this is precisely what happens, pursue the so namely to set up 2 sovereign states people. and there are people who believe that this path is going to lead us to peace. and this is what we'll allow finding the piece for me. let us ask for russia playing a leading role. i don't think we need to do that because there are many players who are involved in that conflict and who have a great deal of influence with the developments we're making a contribution to finding the solution is something we could do given the relationships of we have fostered over the recent decades with israel and also given the relations we have traditionally had with these law minute role with the arrow more uh these relations are based on trust. but i think that the main contribution was need to come from the countries of the region and also the regional organizations such as the organization for as long as the cooperation, mostly the arab league of the neighboring countries, such as the egypt,

saudi arabia, the gulf countries certainly as one of the leading players and these lawman world and certainly the us to meet them. we are not holding onto some extreme issues issues according to which the us has to be excluded from the settlement. that's just impossible on the new and israel has to play a role as well because they split the golden mean needs to be found. and i reiterate this can be done, given the sentiments in the american society is rarely society, given the sentiment in the air in the world. a scanner is womach world. we're trying to do what we can providing in particular humanitarian assistance. as you're aware of, we played a certain role in securing the release of several hostages of russian origin. so should we continue to work in pursuing this avenue by working with our partners who are actually saying that we've got good relations with based on trust. and we've been fostering those relations for decades, but we need to work together rather than trying to monopolize or piece process that

would be harmful. sure. because monopolizing could be a good thing if the one doing the monopolizing start with mutual position in the monopolize or is incapable of pursuing this neutral position. sooner or later its sides with one of the sides. it all falls apart, resulting in the tragedies like the ones we are currently witnessing about the scenario. how do you see this conflict now door and goes on for the and one of those questions on the menus, for sure. we have come up with a number of initiatives you insecurities, counsel calling for a cease fire like you us is blocked. that is on the veto in those initiatives. just a moment. how do we've been working solidarity, trying to secure an agreement that would be a positive scenario. but so far it has not succeeded directly call for a ceasefire because she this initiative and that an issue there had not been reciprocal vito's rather trying to find

a solution working together really. and that would probably be the path towards finding the solution to this problem 2 solos. to addition, you put it in another question. you want us to ask this just my question is going back to kind of what to do to get a new keyboard and how it goes. oh, each doctor is the religious slipknot. so, you know, there are always accusations funded us that we are a new killer cyber rattle. it was here. the one asking the question about the possible and it is in your view or the one to ask a big question. you weren't pushing me towards this question, and then you'll say that i've been brandishing the way to their truncheon about this is a very brief summary on the us as the only country to of use nuclear weapons during the 2nd world war 2 or seem on august socks, 20 kilo tires of the car, tactical nuclear weapons, similarly 7075 kilograms. just the package of the,

i mean, he comes soon. so let's not push the situation to towards the point. so when even a threat is involved, let alone the nu. so when you see the weapons, for some reason, the west believes that russia is never going to resort to that. but we've got a new doctor in place. he does have a look at it to what does it say? it says that someone else's action is to just threaten our sovereignty or territorial integrity. and then we believe we have the right to use all the tools we had artist or something. no. and no one should take that lightly. or super. officially, there needs to be in the professional view of that, but you should and i am hopeful that everyone across the world is going to receive that in this fashion. when addressing such issues, the

the, the, [000:00:00;00]

the are headline stories this our a part of this is to supply you train with war planes law to strike russian territory with french weapons. the pledge was made on thursday by president mac chrome and a romping off of war rhetoric by the european nations. also a head this forwarded in that direction of nato, brings natal closer to the more than ever before. and on r t exclusive, the hon gary and foreign minister tells us his country will never participate in actions that would escalate events in the public starting that he has been to join . nature only brings the blog closer to war. and 14 people are reported