of the would you be making the bite and say spire, which apparently originated in israel, said this is really government fails to own. is this merely cheap domestic political posturing, or a reflection of the moral rocks of american foreign policy? probably in the late 18 ninety's french soldiers led by general, arrived in asia with the goal of expanding french control in west africa to the territory of more than shot. the funny, i mean, he's stuck up some issues with all the cars. and just showing this to the tent, the food i on the east, one of the most terrific campaigns of atrocities to have ever taken place in the history of the continent. somebody, i should know. do i pay for them to question richard dental? and i'm philosophy followed there to do so. they put the national multiple villages

with devastated a numerous members of resistance groups with the headed home for us to get the young investigator in search of his own identity and box on the journey. so africa feet traces general good eyes, blood drenched roots in an effort to establish how your legacy still echoes throughout the confidence. so my name is center and i come from england and i've come ready to find out more about the, the mission, hopefully. and the history in the region, the what is part of the, the employee would posted isn't the

defense you of us and that in the word part is it something deeper, more complex might be present. let's stop without collision is best of product or the after the establishment of the boxes resuming lisbon. in 1933, the position of the indigenous population in the portuguese colonies deteriorated dramatically, especially in angola. decatur, antonio de, i live at salazar, encourage colonizing the end goal in lands by europeans, and sought after turning the country into a portuguese province. where the and goldens would be 2nd class people. in 1961,

there was an outbreak of violence on the part of the portuguese, in revenge for the plantation workers, dry portuguese aircraft bomb. the villages in northern angola and race rides took place in african parts of lawanda. the people of angelo rose in an armed rebellion . the roots atlas of the colonial list knew no bounds. despite the un calls to stop the violence, the board to gaze only intensified their terror against the rebels. the 40s actively used the political contradictions between various groups of rebels during the war colonial aircraft. regularly use a farm and drop the fully ends on peaceful villages. the portuguese empire was severely exhausted by the struggle against the national liberation movements. the revolution in portugal brought down the plaza as freezing and put it in to the murder as war against the people of angola. on january 15, 1975,

the elbow or agreements were assigned, and the country gained independence after so many years of the brutal war, the limits and that's what i said to live now. i'll be very short. so tomorrow we're going to celebrate the eighty's anniversary of, of the, the day of the us and french soldiers. they fought together with russian soldiers and associates. soldiers that do, do you, can you rule out that right now russians, french and the us can work together. and be partners it to and you can see, you know, we cannot rule that out. it's the us and europeans who are rolling that out. were all for it. we did not introduce any sanctions against europe. we did not discontinue providing energy to europe to germany. we are being sanctioned here.

you said that tomorrow they're going to celebrate 80 year anniversary of the day of the disarmament in normandy. we have always held our allies in the greatest esteem, both the americans, the british, the french, incidentally, do they know in france that it was stolen, who insisted on francis presence and not just presents. but also in frances signing the capitulation act with germany. both the us and the u. k. were against that, it was stolen, who insisted on france as being there is a victory country. when the pact on unconditional surrender was signed with germany, the french do not remember. maybe they do not want that, or maybe they did not think much of it, but it's a historical fact. something we've preserved in our archives, we've always had great respect for france that was fighting and resisting despite german troops marching from paris. we supported the marquis and also the normandy newman pilots and open our doors. our doors are always open to talks to

negotiations and discussions. you've just mentioned that, but it says if we're not welcome at that holiday as it were, how many americans died in the 2nd world war? 500000. and even fewer british citizens died. the number is lower than that of those who died during the 1st to world war with the biggest sacrifice and the altar of this victory was made by the soviet union. according to the latest calculation, around 27000000 people, out of them around 70 percent, from the russian socialist federation of the soviet republic. russia accounts for 70 percent of those losses. they're asking whether we're willing or not willing, but no one has invited us. the biggest contribution to the feeding naziism and it's evident you have to simply read churchill, you know, the biggest contribution comes from the soviet union on the biggest contribution to the shared victory over naziism. and everyone knows that only the most dishonest

people are trying to distort these historical facts. okay, let them be, let them celebrate without us we, you know, it's not going to do as much damage. but they're saying that the current leadership of ukraine is going to be there right now. but just listen, how can you celebrate such an important anniversary in the fight against naziism together with those who are putting the neo nazis on a pedestal, making national heroes out of them so far as the current symbol of ukrainian statehood is been dara. who is one of the major henchmen of hitler and the territory of eastern europe and it was through the hands of band rates. the thousands of russians and poles and jews were shot dead. she was the closest accomplice of hitler. yeah, at the end of the war, he sniffed on the wind that victory was escaping from the clutch of hitler. and he started to search for new allies in the west. and the germans took note of that. but he was the main collaboration just. and he threw a hand salute welcoming the nazis, and he was directly collaborating with them back then he was still legitimate. and

the head of ukraine applauded. standing a former nazi at the canadian parliament. do you know about that? because of course everyone knows about that. but the media of the west to europe, the us and canada, we're trying to keep it all hush. even though it was a person who fought against the allies during the 2nd world war. and everyone stood up and applauded the person who, as they said, had fought against russia and who did fight against russia during the 2nd world war . it was hitler and his allies. so the man who got that standing ovation was a former soldier and tomorrow, the very same people are going to celebrate the day. what are we to make of that? and especially given the fact that russia is the successor state of us sr that suffered such heavy losses. well, there seemed to invite that. okay, we'll survive that. but you know, that answers your question about who is interested in rebuilding relation and who

is not. we are all in favor visually, but my question also require regards ukraine still you, if you cannot tell us the number, the loss of the russian to know to service men in the training and during the conflict, this is just the rest of it. if it's the only thing that is of interest to you, i say that usually no one talks about it. and if they talk about it, then generally they distort the real figures. now i can tell you with full confidence that our losses, especially if it regards well. unfortunately, you're repairable losses. there are many times smaller than the ukrainian side. and that can tell you, the number of people in the prisoners of war are soldiers and officers that have been held captive. 1348 people. i know these figures because we're working with them every day. and quite recently, there was an exchange of 75 people on each side, ukrainian soldiers that were holding 6465. if we talked about

a repairable losses, i mean the dead. and i think it's the same ratio one to 5. so that's our logic here . that is why they're trying to conduct a total dropped and ukraine because the losses in the battlefield are tremendous. you know, we think that our calculations are that the creating army is losing about $50000.00 people per month. these are all casualties, so i think there are a 50 to 50 ratio of a reversible repairable losses and injuries. the total draft that is being held right now does not solve this issue. nevertheless, according to our data from different sources, about $30000.00 per month are being drafted, conscripted whether it's foss draft or not. well, they are not that many volunteers right now. so i think last month they drafted about $50.00 to $55000.00, but it does not solve the issue. why? because this draft just covers the losses. it's all just to repair the losses. it's a major issue that leads to the lowering of the draft age. now they've lowered it

from 27 to 25 years, and we simply know it, well, it's an open secret and there are basically no secrets there and ukraine. the administration of the us is insisting on a stage by stage lowering of a conscription age from 23 to 20, to 18, or to 18 years straight away. because right now they're asking 17 year olds, 17 year old males to be put on the military register, and we know it for sure. that's the demand by the us administration. it's a demand to the training and leadership. if we can think that they're still leadership after the elections were cancelled. i've recently spoken publicly about that. i think when i met the press, when i left who is becca stand after a visit there. and i think that the us administration will indeed make the current ukrainian leadership make this decision to lower the drafting age to 18 years. and they later would get rid of the landscape 1st. that needs to be done because this

is a very difficult matter. a law must be adopted and certain steps must be taken. now we're in june 2024. and to do that all of it. i think it would take a year. so until spring the beginning of the next year, she will be tolerated. when's the landscape? does it off? they will waive him. good bye. i don't sample change. i think there are several candidates now, but it has to do with tremendous losses. $50000.00 is the most modest calculations . $50000.00 is what we see on the battlefield. and if you take into account that there are certain losses that well, we know that they're there, but we cannot confirm them because they're happening at the homefront. they're still tremendous losses. i mean, what i do from that is the moment we used to have the, a journalist or mandatory dinner on the 9th of may 2000 and it's, we died in a new train. we think that he died after their joining strikes is we think

france is conducting investigation and they're saying that the drone that killed him came from russia. well that's, that's my question. but the ministry of justice, your friends, we'd like to conduct an investigation. we'd like to conduct investigation. is russia prepared to cooperate with france? so we would not would truly happen if it was a major tragedy for us, for our agency. because the, you know, and she was divide by family who was 32, vermont saline was 320. so we would like to have some closure, some kind of serious investigative work done to know what happened with russia take part in that which is which is menu. cuz then yeah, because of the, you know, we've never refused to take part in investigations. do you know how many journalist died in the world zone? do you remember dmitri, at least 30 journalist, died, are journalist died there,

and no one has given an opportunity to investigate what happened to them is that's number one. number 2, if we talk about what's happening in a new crane, they're in jail, in prison, in the key of regime. and american journalist was tortured to death. but i'm like, you, the united states are not even asking what happened to him. he was an american citizen, a journalist, who was captured at the border, dragged into jail and he died there. he was tortured to death. that's what happened . it's not a figure of speech, but no one asked what truly happened to him. despite that, we're prepared to organize this investigation. i don't quite know how to put it into practice because of a person died in the war zone then. well, still, we can do everything in our power for that. and so for today, the relations between, as a bridge on and russia and developing in an upward trend and recent visit of presents to live to moscow, gave

a chance not only to celebrate and memorable anniversary, 50 years of the bottom railroad, but also to discuss bilateral relations, what's your take on the future? i would look for bi level cooperation and in particular, the development of, of the transportation quite or north south a machine, you know, sort of do it. so our relations are developing successfully and reliably internet pragmatic fashion we, we feel the stance of us are by john, which is building our interest state relations based on mutual interests. so, and also there is an element of mutual sympathy because otherwise it wouldn't be possible to explain the presence of $300.00 schools in russian language in azerbaijan. children are being taught in russian. and i know that president ali is, is fully supporting the study of the russian language in us or by john. and we can see that in all aspects in all spears, which tell us that the leadership of us are by john believes that the russian

language is going to be something that as their citizens are going to need. and they will need that language for further developing our bilateral tides, which are developing our trade stance at $4.00 us dollars. and the pace of this development is very good, very steady, and we're increasingly diversifying our relations. i am confident that we should manage to reserve these good intentions on both sides and russia. we share those intentions. then the outcomes are going to be great. of course there's still a lot that needs to be done and you are absolutely correct and saying that we need to further develop the logistics, not just the north south court or, but also there are other dimensions on that such as setting up logistics hubs at the very russian border at the deca, stanny stretch where the works are correct, leander ways, and it also applies to other directions. we have quite a big number of students studying at russian university's receiving scholarships

from the budget. and we put in what we see there is a very big interest and receiving further education as far as that north southcourt or is concerned, it can turn into an international route which is in high demand. because right from here, cargo shipments from the port of st. petersburg can flow through the european part of russia been on to us or by john, and then onwards to the coast of the gulf, maybe 10 days or so faster than if they were to go through the suez canal. but i'm not saying anything bad about the soonest canal. it's very good for the world trade . but this new trade route would be an additional route, a very good one for shipping goods from the north to the south, and vice versa. 10 days faster. because this will help us save a lot. this is a very good route, but there still is a lot that needs to be done. we're working on both sides. i'm aware that the president supports this project. we've spoken with him about that on many occasions, the leadership of ron is also in support of this project and says this project

promises to be very beneficial. but there are other foreign investors that have expressed their interest in that route and not even original investors, but investors from say, other sovereign wealth funds of error countries because they're always searching for a possibility to invest money in reliable endeavors. there are still issues that need to be studied further in particular, what stretches and where, and how they're going to be funded. is it going to be based on a loan, or is there going to be direct funding from russia? how is this going to fit in with the streams that are going to head westwards across the territory of us or beyond that? we need to finalize some issues with our running and friends and partners. whether it's going to be a narrow gauge or a wide gauge road, i mean, the one that's going to be built on the territory of your on. but the crux of the matter is everyone is determined to implement this project. we've set up as the director of the to be is the organization responsible for that? i am confident that we will complete this project with you. well,

it's going to take some time. there are some issues about funding issue, but this is not the only project we are pursuing together. apart from that, azerbaijan is a caspian state. it's one of the 5 caspian states, and that means that we've got many joint interest, some apply to the environment of the caspian sea. the do you put your junk of mister president? presently, you have conducted a state visit to china when you have quite close relations with china. this can be cited as a model for building relations between you may dial us. what's your take on the current state of cooperation between russia and china? as well as far as our bilateral relations go, i would like to tell you that they are not short term relations. they are based upon fundamental principles for 15 years. china has been our major trade partner

and so we started to build our relations and we propelled it to the current level not pursuing some short term fleeting goals that come and go day in and day out. we decided to pursue this relationship based on mutual interest in a calm, gradual fashion here. and i can tell you that we are making sewage headway. we currently are bilateral trade has exceeded our expectations. it's $240000000000.00 us dollars, according to the chinese statistics. initially, we assessed that number at 230000000000 according to our statisticians as well. but it's not just about our trade. our trade is about being diversified and quite successfully to boot. and it's not just about hydrocarbons or hydro power, but they're also supplies and oil and coal in energy. we're also building nuclear power plants in the people's republic of china and doing that quite successfully. all of that is happening. but we're also cooperating and high tech and we've got

very good prospects. i refer in particular to aviation to a i, you know, we're happy here. we celebrate china successes in different domains. in particular . it's space exploration. there are some unique achievements we're talking about. and then the communist party of china is the leading political force in china. everything that's done over there is done under the guidance of the communist party of china. and that's something i would like to draw your attention to. i said that i don't know whether i said that in this format and whether that's going to be interesting to you. but there are some experts in russia, very good economists, quite young people, i'll be already very experienced. but they say that the analysis of what's happening in china is the economy and the analysis of what's happening in other economies across the world. including the leading economies such as the us show that china has succeeded some buildings sufficient, obvious, peculiar economic model that might even be more efficient than the one that the us has. and judging by the results,

the economy of china is demonstrating. this is something we can agree on. yes, there might be some discussion of some western partners of ours that say, chinese economy is not entirely based on the market. there are regulations by the party, but the outcome is out there for everyone to see. and it shows that this model is more efficient and the chinese leadership needs to think about every since in each and every citizen. and not all of them live on the same level as an average european or american citizen. so it's up to the leadership of china to take the decisions that will allow them to see to the needs and the vital needs of chinese citizens. and all of that is done thanks to a good friend of mine and the leader of china. president, gigi, and king of joseph, they are cheating. great success is doing that reliably and steadily, and we can only be happy for them. we're aware of everything that's happening in the world's leading economies, including china's economy. chinese economy is generally very reliable and it's

becoming increasingly based on high technology. and i think it's a huge mistake on the part of the us and number of european countries. they're trying to somehow stymied or bring down the piece of the chinese economy. because i think in order for them to be successful, they would need to fit those processes to integrate them rather than trying to obstruct them. some very smart people say that china is over producing cars and also over producing electric cars, who's seen such things. it's those who believe themselves to be proponents of the market. there's nothing we don't they know who decides whether there is an over production or not. it's up to the market to the size of the city of china, produces a certain number of cars and all of that is consumed and absorbed by the market. what kind of an over production are we talking about? it's just nonsense. is it possible a call that over production? no, that's not called that it's called an attempt at stymied in the growth through non market means. and that is harmful in particular to the us economy. and why is that?

you're not taking goods from china, these goods, or those goods. will it result in themselves producing something? no, it will produce them and having to buy from elsewhere. and this is going to be more expensive. this will result in a higher inflation rate and the higher inflation rate is going to have in the various impact upon the economic structure of the country. there's doing such things and it's going to be harmful in this particular case to the economy of the us. it's an air mistake yet another one. you had another mistake of the current administration of the us. as for china, yes, they have very professional guidance by presidency, and they are moving ahead at a very good pace. and there are other fields, and i've always spoken about them. and i can tell you that our cooperation in the international arena is a motivating factor and also a source of stability. you know, we conducted exercises and we're going to continue conducting exercises, including military exercises with them. we're also engaged,

military and technical cooperation and we've got a lot to offer our chinese friends. and there's an interest on china side in this kind of cooperation or cooperation is not confined either to economic or to military technical cooperation or to international cooperation. you might think this year we have proclaimed across years of culture and our moderator, you know, said that, you know, russian songs, you speak russian. and i think this is just as important as the rest. i've just spoken about that because that leaves the foundations of relationships between the people's increase of favorable environment for pursuing the relations across all other sectors. and this is something we'll strive to stick with hands for. and i am hopeful that we will be able to meet with present she and speak about all these issues. and i hope will be able to meet within the framework, the seal and the bricks. organization, the

in the year of 1954, the united states of america engaged in warfare against the people of vietnam. the white house supported the corrupt above and governments of southern vietnam. 1965 americans began their invasion following the aim to defeat the forces of vietnamese patriots. the pentagon was confident that the victory would be on the american side, due to its military superiority. however, the vietnamese, during this war into total health for the occupants. unable to cope with a guerrillas, the american army started blanket bombing alongside using chemical weapons and

naples, which burnt all alive. the village of my lay, where he 1969 american soldiers killed 504 civilians, including 210 children, became a tragic symbol of this war. all and all. during the whole period of this conflict, the usa dropped on vietnam more than $6000000.00 tons of bonds, which is 2 and a half times as much as on germany during the 2nd world war. in 1973, the american army under the pressure of the rebels, withdrew from vietnam, and only 2 years later did the puppet regime. and so i got involved. however, the vietnamese paid a high price for their freedom. more than 1000000 in vietnamese people became the victims of american aggressors. the

rom just don't need to see the house and engagement because the trail when so many find themselves will support. we choose to look so common ground the the

the,

the headline stories this our a part of this is to supply you train with war planes, la la t f to strike russian territory with french weapons. the pledge was made on thursday by president mac chrome and a romping off of more rhetoric by the european nation, also ahead. this affordability of action of nato brings natal closer to do more than ever before. and on r t exclusive, the hon. gary and foreign minister tells us his country will never participate in actions of with escalate events and the conflict nodding that he has paid to join. nato only brings the blog closer to war. and 40 people are reported killed and dozens more wounded. and it's really euro strikes so.