to moscow they still want to know i have convey jane, meaning the garments for empowers there. and so, you know, they have no plan the, it's obviously it's been obvious for a while and we do when you're talking to an adversary that doesn't have planned re, that's a very dangerous situation, especially on both sides. are armed with, uh, no clue what that is. competing so you know, ukraine, both ukraine, both the west skin, the west understand very well. and that was what russia saying. uh, but obviously they're not interested. beautiful. right? we have some living here now, alexander pavek. that'd be a member of parliament. thank you so much for your insight here. my pleasure. how i that's the update this time. next is direct impact with rick sanchez. we'll be back right back again with news off at the top of the out by not the

more than 200 years before moscow was the seat of power. st. petersburg was larisse, london, the capital of the russian empire. and it was here that the roman uh family, established a tradition of luxury high end items like imperial porcelain and establishes the entire body of rick sanchez. this is direct impact. and this is what we are going to be talking about from us has responded to the latest proposal for a hostage and sees fire deal and from us has rejected it. it's how boss has not rejected it. but he said that, why did he say that? because he thinks that whatever is real, says must be the truth. probably state department to, i'm a said just let's do it. the

the, you know, if you ever wanted proof of what i always say about the western media, specifically the corporate media in the united states. i want you to watch this clip again, okay? this clip of jake tapper, the reports flat out that how miles has just re directed the piece proposal that was offered to that. so why does he say that? why does he say, why does jake tapper just call me or and say that my mouse said no to the peace proposal because that's what the state department, and that's what the is really government has pulled out even though it may not be true. all right, here we go. watch what happens from us has responded to the latest proposal for a hostage and cease fire deal and from us has rejected it to and political and

foreign policy analyst, but rock ravine is breaking us a did from osbourne. give any explanation for its rejection. hi jake. so 1st come us did not say that the rejected the de la mad said he goes on to explain by the way, that his next words, if we had continued to watch it, and you can find that yourself. it's on youtube. he says, how much did that say they rejected the deal? jake, israel says how mos rejected the deal. a me look at i'm and so he corrected them right there on the year olds. oh, i told my viewers a lot. you know, um and again i'm not trying to make fun of jake tapper for making a mistake. we all make mistakes, including me. i make more mistakes than most people asked my wife. but however, i do believe that the jig tappers, of the world in the western media. and the point i'm trying to make here is that

they automatically default to the establishment position without asking, well, wait a minute. is this true? so if the state department puts it out, they just report it as gospel. you know, china bad rush about iran, bad, whatever, whatever they want you to say you just reported, and a mirror off and the not, it's the establishment positions, sometimes vanilla that they've pulled out without even knowing that they're doing so because i think i, it's, it's, it's almost like a like like an in green response and them, it's, it's, it's, it's a cycle, sematic response. and i think that's what we saw with jake tapper there. you're great. yeah, it's i, it's probably a little bit of a knee jerk reaction rick, but at this point it's hard to tell if it's a flood or deliberate delivery of fake news. i mean, in my opinion, um, you know, i see this is parenting the, the state department to sort of perpetuate the notion that how mosse is this is the

actual unyielding side of tacitly. it hasn't create this false image, that the israel, these are the reasonable guys in this fight. you know, at this point, it's no wonder that the worship at cnn is so low. email number 3 in april ratings. um it was fox m s, and the cnn. cnn viewers can't rely on what they say. i'll be at some viewers do blindly, you know, believe, but that's a small contingent and they are rapidly fading into yesteryear. that's why alternative media independent media are exploding with clicks. i mean, are the argue argument becomes read that they say, oh, well people are just cutting the court. it's not even just that because seen and tried to go with the streaming platform and it failed miserably if we recall. and they still have the ability to be able to reach a very sizable audience over the age of 55 because they depend on them for that.

and apparently because they are in cahoots as we like to say, with google and all the other tech companies. so if jake tapper puts out a segment, everybody sees it because they make sure it's on youtube. whereas if you, when i put out a segment, it gets buried by the technology. so in that sense, they still get the word out, even though half the crap. they're saying is wrong. all right, i've got another one for you, right? i've got another video i have to show you that is a bit of a media, a game changer for ukraine's on elected president of war and beggary. those are the words, the words that are being used by almost half of the members of the german parliament who bowed. president zalinski, i know he's not elected, but they still call him president when he showed up to speak. this is how the times of india described it in their video. by the way, here it is. there it is right there. look at that split screen. that's him walking in with

a couple of people cheering those empty blue seats. you see right there are where the german m p is what upsets, but they decided to instead board cod zalinski is page and many of them put out a statement saying that a guy dressed in camouflage who isn't even elected should not be honored at the german boot and his dog. apparently, they pointed out that russia is ready to negotiate an end to this fighting, but the lensky is not because instead, he's willing to risk their words. he's willing to risk nuclear war. they say, to achieve his goals, are you surprised? but by this reaction by the german m p's, i was manila no, actually not at all, rick. and we need to point out zaleski wasn't exactly wearing tam o this time. he had a black shirt and i think it had a color. so that's, you know, a step up, he's dressing up as okay, so, so look at the, be in the party in germany was

a big winner and last week's annual elections. right. and it has a sizable group in the, the german buddhist jobs. so 1st, let's point out that the a, if the, the alternative for deutschland i'm, yeah, they're among one of the newer major parties in the buddhist on and, and it's not exactly far, right, not in the way that we think of it here in america as far right, they're not white supremacist or walk, you know, they're not walking with torches. they're not the hiring or any of that. they're actually a coalition of people from baring backgrounds, even very political believes, who sort of have this germany 1st platform, if you will. i have a source close to the f b who tells me that the party actually has the most views as senior members. so it's a call them far right white nationalist is, is really a bridge too far. but if these guys who are calling for peace between ukraine and russia and they're sick and tired of seeing zelinski manipulate olaf schultz, you know, they're spineless, chancellor, and they keep it. and they said that this guy zalinski keeps taking their tax

dollars abroad to fight. what they knew was a proxy war by the americans and the f. d is angry about the cost of energy, the cost of gas. they've got a full price. all that they use a lift gate as a drain on their, on their economy. it would be surprising for more people to not be saying this. i mean, i don't understand where, where we're shocked or i'm saying i was surprised to see this because here in the united states, you probably couldn't get 5 people and congress to stand up and do what all of those people who are in these, in germany did there's no way in the world that we would get that kind of, uh, off that type of optics here in the united states. and yet look, we're, we're, we're set, we're seeing it in germany. and maybe it's the beginning of a common sense of movement. if you will, all right, yet another example of a show of defiance. you know, i love defiance. i'm a big fan of devices. uh, this is an anti war activist. somehow you can see in this video, he gets into

a bite and the vat uh, president binding to that. and let me tell you that's hard to do these days. present a bite and these days is protected so much. nobody can get near them. they don't want people around them, they don't want reporters to ask them questions. they don't want, they don't want anything to go out of sorts for this guy. so they protect him. well, this guy got in somehow, i don't know. maybe he paid to pretended to be a donor because all the people of this gathering, providing they've all been very carefully selected. this guy shows up the yellows or the president right to his face, the cause of genocide, joe, accused them of killing thousands of children. it's kind of hard to hear, so i'm gonna play it twice for you here it is of the. 6 the, the. 6 the

for more years i'm looking to buy, been a big again, this guy was for boy years, but anyway, i, i grass. what i find fascinating is how this audience. and i know they're very handpick democratic party loyalists, but still, i mean, there boeing this guy who's essentially telling the truth. i mean, love it or hate, it is what he's saying is true. the united states was involved in the death of these 15000 children in gaza and this guy saying, and these guys instead are bullying them down. nobody has a right to hear your message. sure. get the hell out of here. i don't know. it's troubling manila for more years. i don't know if he's got 4 more minutes. rec, um, i don't get what the bite and supporters are booing. exactly. i mean, are there blues to be understood as pro genocide cheers. i'm not sure

the protest or i say he got it right. he has every right to tell his elective leaders, whoever they might be, in this case, post himself, what he really thinks and expresses disappointment of the officials, actions, but noticed one thing about the majority of those in attendance, bullying. this man rick, is a see of elderly people and he of white and gray hairs. that's who supports biden and wants those 4 more years. as you know, they counter chanted, but by the looks of it, rick, i really, really don't think neither. they nor biden have 4 more years, sorry, but not sorry. yeah. and, and yet were told that he doesn't look good in public, but trust me, behind the scenes. he's filled with vin, many bigger and strange. but why don't i bring that guy out? like, oh okay. the one we don't see is the incredible one. yeah. got it. sure. uh huh.

taking notes over here. your fantastic partner, i love talking to you. i appreciate it. have a great weekend, correct. by the way, i do, i do have one more point the and i think this is important and bye for it. before i go to the break, i was just thinking that i should probably say there's apparently 2 bricks. nations are now quietly putting together the framework for a piece deal to settle the ukraine issue once and for all and interesting. it's china and brazil. china and brazil have come together. they're leading and the talks to that are according to both countries. they've been getting a lot of surprise, a surprising amount of support from many other countries you are calling and saying, we want to be a part of this. we want to make it work. you know, and to that, i say fingers crossed for piece when we come back. my next guest is written a very popular book that explains all 500 years western head. germany is ending. there it is. that's the book. so now it says we're in this transition period where

the world is an illegal vacuum in which the conflicting sides are competing to define the future order of our world. who is this man? there is you're looking at a, let's go and diesel. he's a professor, he's an author, and the book of that i just described as his, it's called the ukraine war and the your region world border. you should read it. he's next, he's going to talk to us. don't go away, stay right there. the old wanted to come here since i was 121. my grandfather told me that his mom came from russia that we were, i was part russian. i didn't plan on staying this long. i was gonna look around, i was gonna see if it was for me, but then i came and then i was like,

i don't remember when i go home. i've never been happier in life. and i am here in most of the, i've only lived here a few months, but i wanted to tell you what fascinates me about russia and share the stories of other foreigners who lived here like jay who worked as a chef and now raises goats and makes cheese in the countryside series, like chad who has been granted political asylum because he's being persecuted by the f. b. i. us, embassies, and for countries that come after me it's, it's wild like an american family that recently moved to russia with 6 children. i've never felt safe or land tire life then living here the, the known in vietnam america, the vietnam war, lost it for almost 2 decades and dragged in numerous countries. not any time we have now, but i don't see it now. wow. it's all,

i'm empty. hundreds of thousands of american troops was sent to the country to back the south vietnamese on me. i thought about that not, but the american soldiers murdered resistors mercilessly burned down entire villages and spread dangerous chemicals. and lee laid up day by all right. did the americans ever fully acknowledge what they did on the vietnamese veterans ready to forgive? yes, yes. that's the way to the

water bag. i'm rick sanchez. here he is, professor glen decent. you wrote a book once again. the book is called that ukraine war and the your asian world order. he's good enough to join us now. i've been looking forward to having this conversation. professor, thanks so much for joining us, sir. oh, thanks for holding. you know. so i, i'm fascinated 1st speaking, just in general terms, not about specifics of anything going on in the world. the idea that you present that for 500 years, we've had this western control which is somewhat colonial lives of the world. and you're saying we happen to be living in a period right now where that is transitioning out. is that correct? ah, yes, that's correct. so we have various kinds of world orders, but the most recent one was the one that came into being after the cold war, when to a solar one, a super power left in which we're the unit puller world order,

one central power. and this one central power and effectively a claim, the rights to represent universal values. so we'd like a global version of dr. in were us and the collective west can intervene anywhere in the world if it's deals liberal democratic values are threatened. and so we have this order for 30 years, but, but small, it coming to an end. but, and by the way, to take it back, even just a little bit further, i'm thinking, well, the dutch did it in africa, the british did it in uh, you know, the caribbean and other parts of the world. the spanish didn't in, in my country. and my part of the world in latin america. so it wasn't just what happened post world war 2, where the united states was the big, tough guy, even before the united states, there was all these other powers were colonial lives in the world, correct? right. the way of course, and the well, this is supposed to be quite unique about the world order the most of the rules which emerged and were actually based on it was considered to be a european order. so the idea on sovereign equality,

but his sovereignty for all the states was then reserved for the europeans. it was that there were no christian lights, uh, civilized people, it was considered. so the rest of the world didn't that it wasn't seemed to qualify for the same amount of sovereignty. now and you know, we can forward is set to the present time and we. ready we speak the same way, i'm up the liberal democracy is versus so far a terran states. so let's have a liberal democracies to the joyful sovereignty and the, the rest of the system should have limited. so it's always been based on a similar pattern, not least, but you're correct. the colonialism, all of this kind of happened under the same format. the rules are so, so when do, when do we see this real transition starting to take cold? because i could argue that, well, you know, we had pushed back in, in the, we've gone the pushing, you know, the british out of there. so wasn't that the beginning of

a knock inside other examples? and perhaps, you know, indonesia, for example, you see similar situations, what are you saying? we're more in the midst of it now than we were before or ever before. and if so, tell me why as well over the past 500 years. so we have various different kinds of order. so obviously there's always been some states or peoples who have pushed against the dominant forces me about what is quite unique is because of that in the beginning of the 16 century, this really when the european powers began to control over the world sees and this is when a lot of the dominance began as well. now, well, what i'm arguing is quite different. this time we have multiple arctic before, but it was a concentration of power within the virus western states. so you'll be in the united states. what's quite unique now is that that will, the leading our in the world that is becoming out of china. and also you having

a new sense of power, bit to india as well. now obviously, and try to assist the british rule, but the never being considered one of the key poles of power in the international system. and this is really what the world orders about is about the distribution of power. and also the, the, the legitimacy for the rules much to reflect, i would almost stick to the, what's unique about this moment is, yeah, and i'm sure you agree. i was right. there was a time when the indians kicked the british out. and that was fascinating, that they would do it, but it was kind of a, it was a solo player at the time they have what we have is india is still pushing its strength very successful economically. and then you'll have rush up, push. it gets strength, very successful, it minutes early. then you have china pushing. it's showing it's, it's, it's strength as well. a ron as well of south africa. there's all these countries that are coming together, whatever you want to call them bricks,

global south. and they really kind of created create this force that's making a difference. i think your point becomes most clear when we think of this, this 2nd submarine that maybe just arrived in nevada, where russia is say, a, to the united states, 90 miles off of its coast. you're going to bomb us, you know what, we have the ability to hurt you to we don't want to, but you can't just continue to push us the way you've been pushing us. and that may be, is a freeze moment of the conceptualize thought that you create in this book that, that you've written, which people are, are, are, are, are so fond of. yeah, because, well, they are still operates under the unit fuller world or wherever it seems. there's only one central power. now this manifesto itself and 2 as a rule. so it's one set of rules for the united states, another for the rest. so the us would see itself a setting having the project into, for example, as a, as

a well established middleton alliances on the border of russia. and this is, this is not problematic, but of course, the russia doesn't have the same permission. i mean, mexico doesn't have the right to join a russian or chinese the line so, so this is the, essentially, the system that the united states has been living on when under which it claims one set of rules for itself, which is also referred to as the rules basically national order. meanwhile, what we see now is a multiple of system emerging. and this is the rules to refer to what emotions pushing through saying, no, this is a system based on solving the call to. if you claim a right, we will do it too. so they're doing a show for us where they're saying if you're going to set up your military in, in ukraine, then we have the right to do the same in cuba or venezuela or close to a board as effectively the same rules should apply for both sides so this is a and us, the distribution of power shifts and you have new sensors, a power, they also then come testing this whole idea of the united states claims. this is special the rights or privileges in the international system to act in

a way which others are not permitted to so. so if we're in this transition period right now, when is the back part of the transition period start or are we. busy ready in it and let me continue this question by saying, is that what we're seeing in, for example, the case of gaza where it seems the whole world is looking at israel and saying who the hell do you think you are to be doing this? and israel is saying we can do whatever we want because we've got the united states support. but some point you have to think that there's going to be so much pushback that it's not going to be good for is real and not good for the united states. when does that happen? is it already happening? what's your view as well? i think that's the vacuum. we're currently in the near correct. the reason why it hasn't been any significant, significant advances in peace because it's been on the us touch them on the you

know, it's really, it's not really how to make any significant compromises with others who could always get its way simply because the united states also is behind it. now what you're seeing is this shift going now this new centers of power, israel's neighbor, so much stronger. a lot of it's a allies begin to take off a step back. the other great powers which are emerging, beatrice, shut china. they're then less sympathetic towards the israel in terms of allowing it to do whatever it wants. so you see now the world effectively being pushed into 2 directions. and this is why the, in this shift from world order israel is under great pressure because the new unit pull rollover can assert itself and do whatever it wants and the us will protect it . but in the multiple our world. and it really needs to seek a piece today because the piece today will be much better than the piece it will have tomorrow. because it's negotiation powers along the weekend as the relative power of the united states goes down. so if it accept this transition to multiple

are the needs to start to find a peace agreement, that ticket is bidding on unit polarity, then it can effectively try to just avoid any compromise. before i run out of time, i have to ask you, this is the most important question that i can ask you. because i think you're, you're viewed as one of the smartest people in the world on this particular geo political discussion that you and are having right now. here's the money question. can we, as a world get to multi polarity without world war 3? so yeah, that's like i said, that is a great question. ideal. it's about transition. what happens through diplomacy and mutual understanding, but historically world orders i've shifted because of uh yeah, through great divorce. so in the beginning of book i, i refer to a quote by get onto, you know, in the head of the world war 2. he made just this quote where they argued in an old world, it has its dying, but the new world can't be born. and isn't this

a vacuum when the oldest cubes crisis start? so this is largely a big reason by having a war and ukraine his is contributed greatly to the conflict in our, in gaza. and it's also why, for example, the americans are pushing for a strengthening exposition in asia by pushing for succession of tie one to prevent a multiple or a system where china has a problem to draw. so. so all of this, uh, it's a good indication that it will probably be more of a new world born through at least some wars because there's simply no willingness to have any diplomacy. so, so you say, you know, so, so, so, so you see more wars on the horizon before we could get to multiple already. if, if it's maybe not a world war 3, but something close to it. uh, well, unfortunately, yeah, that's what i would say because i see most of the world one to multiple market,

they're diversifying their economic come activity, you know, the develop, the rising, they're linking each other's technology button while you're transacting. what's the order is not gonna give it up? they're just not going to give it that. yeah, that is through us and its allies are pushing towards restoring effectively the ninety's. but this isn't coming back in any peaceful manner either. so uh, so hopefully i will be wrong and there will be some diplomatic way of negotiating this, but historically, this has not been the case. yeah. well listen, it's a, it's, it's been an honor and a delight to be able to talk to you. obviously you, you're one of the most well, most read writers on this particular topic all over the world and then we, we, we thank you for taking time to take us through this very, very delicate and yeah, well what and yeah, well composed conversation and explanation. so thank you. once again professor, we really appreciate your time. i think so much. and there you have it. important stuff. it's, you know,

funny to hear that money question answered that way about the world that we're living in right now, but he, i think, is the perfect guy to ask that question to remember. what we always say here is, you know, try to always look outside your own box, look for questions like what the professor was describing because troops, we think don't live in boxes. i'm rick sanchez. thank you for being with us. and we'll see you next time. the, the newest secretary of state, hans, i mean blinking is an odd character. he says he was for peace and justice for the people of gaza. but all a while he acts as israel's lawyer on the international stage. such

a lawyer is merely an undertaker. of the rules based on the me a big list today we are making another concrete real piece proposal, if and given in the wisdom capitals they also refuse it as before. and in the end it is their business, their political and moral responsibility for the continuation of legit lot of put it and says piece as possible, the ukraine, if it leaves done bad supper, always. yeah. kind of concent rules out joining nato, that's f e spoke to the leadership of roches foreign ministry. so if you want to negotiate a peaceful solution to the conflict in ukraine, the way to get there is to provide mentors support to ukraine. just to handle this ways hosted key summit for you, great nikos as the only way to resolve the conflict is to rob up committed to the support for the.