more than i did to the main goal and they see creating conditions for the sustainable development of the country, ensuring it security, and improving the wellbeing of russian families that i see working in this area in today's complex and rapidly changing realities. requests from all of us and even greater concentration of efforts, initiative, perseverance and the ability not only to respond to current challenges, but also to formulate our own long term agenda. we must propose solutions together with our partners, and we'll discuss and open and constructive debates. the options for solving those fundamental issues that concern not only us, but the entire global community could be, they can fire, repeat the world is changing rapidly. it will no longer be the same in global politics. you cannot make so technological competitions. more and more states are seeking to strengthen their sovereignty and self sufficiency. a national and cultural identity established in the countries of the global south and east are coming to the for and the role of africa and latin america is growing. these creeps in soviet times we have always talked about the importance of these regions of the

world. today the dynamics are very different and it is becoming apparent with the pace of transformation and you asia, with a number of large scale integration projects of being actively implemented. as also accelerated significantly. you mean it is on the basis of the new political and economic reality. the contours of a multi fuller and multilateral world order are taking shape today on august. and this is an objective process. it reflects the cultural and civilizational diversity that despite all attempts at artificial unification is organically inherent in human beings. these profound systemic changes will undoubtedly inspire optimism and hope because we establishment of the principles of multiple already and multilateralism in international affairs. including respect for international law and broad representation, make it possible to solve the most complex problems together for the common good to establish mutually beneficial relations and cooperation among southern states in the interest of the wellbeing and security of people. this went to this vision of the future is in line with the aspirations of the opposite. the majority of

countries in the world we're simulating and i'm a b, c. this, among other things that are in the growing interest towards the work of such a universal association as breaks, which is based on a special culture of trustful dialogue and what goes over in the quality is quite disciplines and mutual respect within the framework of this use russian presidency, we will facilitate the smooth integration of new bricks, members into the working structures of the association through by us the government and the ministry of foreign affairs to continue substantive work and dialogue without partners in order to come to the break. some of the thing cuz i'm in october with a substantial set of agreed decisions that will determine the vector of cooperation in politics and security, economy and finance. are you from science, culture, sports, engine, monetary and time? in general, i believe that the potential of the brakes will allow it to become one of the core regulatory institutions of the multiple world. or are we shipping in this context? i would like to note the, the international discussion on the parameters of interaction between states in the multiple world and the democratization of the entire system of international relations is of course already underway. thus, together with colleagues from the commonwealth of independent states,

we have agreed on and adopted a joint document on international relations in a multi polar world. we have invited our partners to discuss this issue in the context of other international platforms festival in the seo and bricks. and we are interested in seeing this dialogue seriously developed within the united nations. including on such a fundamental issue of vital importance to as the creation of a system of indivisible security that was placed in other words, the establishment in world affairs of the principle that the security of some cannot be guaranteed at the expense of the security of others. is it possible to do that? when would you let me remind you that at the end of the 20th century, after the end of the acute military ideological confrontation, the global community had a unique opportunity to build a reliable and just order in the field of securities. this did not require much simple ability to listen to the opinions of all interested parties and a mutual willingness to take them into account to our country was determined to do exactly this kind of constructive work. with

a different approach prevailed. the western powers and by the united states believed that they had won the cold war and had the right to determine how the world should be organized. the practical manifestation of this outlook was the project of unlimited expansion of the north atlantic lock in space and time. despite the existence of alternative ideas for ensuring security in europe. they responded to are justified questions with excuses in claiming that there were no plans to attack russia. and that the expansion of nato was not directed against russia since they effectively forgot about the promises made to the soviet union. and later russia in the late 19 eighties and early 19 nineties that the block would not accept new members. even if they acknowledged those promises, they would grant and dismiss them as near verbal assurances instead what not legally binding in the 19 nineties and later we consistently pointed out the flawed approach taken by western lives. instead of simply criticizing and warning them, we suggested options and constructive solutions, whereas relates to emphasizing the need to develop a mechanism of european and global security. that wouldn't be acceptable to all parties involved. i want to underscore this point. we would take too long to list

all the initiatives advanced by russia over the years of age. and let us recall the idea of a european security treaty. if we propose in 2008, unlimited leisure to issue a new decision, december 2021. a memorandum from the russian foreign ministry was submitted to the united states and nato addressing the same issue. however, all our repeated attempts, it is impossible to list them all to convince our partners as well as our explanations appeals warnings and requests met with no response. here can you be issues, wisdom, countries, confidence not so much in the right, just most of their cause as in their power inability to impose whatever they wish and the rest of the world to simply disregard it. other perspectives, even though you do my best to look at the proposed discussions on less significant matters that did little to resolve the actual problems for matters that only benefitted the west and it soon became clear that the wisdom concept seen as the only viable option for security and prosperity in europe and the world was in fact to assure and effective in the let us recall the tragedy in the balkans. while domestic issues had certainly contributed to the problems in former yugoslavia,

they were greatly exacerbated by intrusive external interference. i see, cuz at that time the main principal of native diplomacy manifested itself most vividly which i deeply flog principal that is of no use in addressing complex internal conflicts or even innocence. this principle aims to assign blame to one party, often disliked by the west for various reasons. and unless the full political, informational, and military might of the west, including economic sanctions and restrictions against 6 later the same approaches were applied in various countries, which we know all too well. which should kind of show up with them as a rock, you know, syria, libya, and that's kind of you because these interventions have done nothing but worse than existing problem room in the lives of millions of people. this will destroy entire states and create hubs of humanitarian and social disasters, as well as terrace don't classes are. in fact, no country in the world isn't even from joining this tragic list. for example, the west is currently trying to brazenly meddling the affairs of the middle east and the previously held them. and i'll play over this region. and the consequences

of their actions are now evident to everyone make of the south focuses. and central asia are also prime examples. and so i mean, 2 years ago and they made those segments in madrid, it was declared that the alliance would now deal with security issues, not only in the euro atlantic, but also in the asia pacific region. and they claim those areas who cannot do without them. clearly this was an attempt to exert more pressure on those countries in the region whose development they have decided to restrain. as you know, rush i rang cy on this list. let me also remind you that it was washington that undermine strategic stability by unilaterally withdrawing from the treaties on anti missile defense on the elimination of intermediate and shorter arrangements house and on open skies. and together with exp, nato satellites dismantling the decades or system of confidence, building measures and arms control in europe to move these last name to self centeredness and arrogance of western countries have let us to a highly perilous situation. today, we are entering dangerously close to a point of no return, which case you calls for a strategic defeat of russia, which possesses the largest arsenault of nuclear weapons. them strictly explain

recklessness of western politicians. you must do it. they either fail to comprehend the magnitude of the threats they are creating. a part are simply consumed by the notion of invincibility and exceptionalism. but both scenarios can result in tragedy. it is evident that the entire system of the euro atlantic security is crumbling before our eyes. at present, it is practically nonexistent, and must be rebuilt. to achieve this, we must collaborate with interest in the countries of which there are many ways to develop our own strategies for ensuring security in your range and then presented them for broader international deliberation. hamilton, this is the task set and the address to the federal assembly here. but i say to outline a vision for equal and indivisible security. mutually beneficial and equitable cooperation and development on the origin continent and the foreseeable future. so we can just do it as a need to what needs to be done to achieve this stage and on what principles. first, it is important to establish dialogue with all potential participants within send this future security system, which i would like to ask you to address the necessary issues with countries that are open to constructive interaction with the russian. during my recent visit to

china, presidents, huge and thing, and i discussed this issue and was noted that the russian proposal is not contradictory, but rather compliments and aligns with the basic principles of the chinese global security initiative. it needs to be february. second, it is crucial to recognize that the future security architecture should be open to all your ration countries that wish to participate in its creation. let's see, for all includes european and maple countries as well as to them, is this loan of torture. we share the same continent and we must live and work together regardless of the circumstances. geography cannot be changed. yes. russia's relations with the you and many european countries have deteriorated. and it is important to emphasize that we are not to blame for the rest of the propaganda campaign involving senior european politicians, which is accompanied by speculation that russia intends to attack us. i have addressed this issue before it's enough by time there is no need to repeat it again here. see what they all understand that these claims are baseless. instead of only to justify an alms rice. in this context, i would like to make a brief digression to make sure it's still a threat to europe does not,

from russia to the main threat to europeans, is a critical and increasing dependence on the united states and military, political, technological, ideological and information on aspects which escape europe is being marginalized in global economic development. plunged into the chaos of challenges such as migration m losing international agency. you should have cultural identity for me. it was always close. sometimes i get the impression that therapy and politicians and representatives of the europe and bureaucracy are more afraid of falling out of favor with washington and losing the trust of their own people. so the recent election to the european parliament has also demonstrated this uniform. politicians tolerate termination, rudeness and scandals such as surveillance of european leaders while the united states simply exploits them for its own benefit. what most of these points will be, for instance, if they are forced to purchase expensive gas, which costs $3.00 to $4.00 times more in europe than in the united states. additionally, european countries are pressure to increase. i'm supplies to ukraine. the demands are constant and sanctions are readily imposed on european economic operators.

without any hesitation and super, they are now pressuring their partners to supply ukraine with more weapons and increase their capacity for manufacturing artillery shouts. who will need the shows once the conflict a new agreement. how does this insure european military security? it is difficult to understand the united states as investing in military technologies, particularly advanced future technologies such as space explorations, modern drones strikes systems based on new physical principles could use the principle in united states as funding areas that will shape the nature of future conflicts. as well as the military and political power of nations and the standing in the way we meet in these countries are expected to invest sewage in areas of interest to the united states. however, this does not expand european potential movement. let them do as they wish. we would probably benefit from it, but in effects, that is a situation. if you're a points to continue being an independent center of global development and a cultural civilizational told on our planet to come in, you should definitely maintain good and friendly relations with russia. most importantly, because we are ready for this. indeed,

politicians are truly european and global scale who patriots of the countries and nations understand this simple and obvious fact we see if they think in terms of historical categories and on not to me or follows of someone else is willing influence to each how's the goal and spoke about this during the postwar period. i vividly recall participating in a conversation in 1991 with german chancellor. helmut kohl emphasized the importance of partnership between europe and russia, and i hope that new generations of european politicians will eventually restore this legacy. speaking of the united states, the never ending attempts by the current global as liberal that leads to spread their ideology worldwide to maintain their imperial status. documents in one way or another are only further exhausting the country, leading to its degredation and clearly contrary to the genuine interest of the american people. if it were not for this debt and policy, which hopefully driven by aggressive mechanism based on the belief in their own superiority and exceptionalism, international relations would have long been stabilized. the 3rd,

it is necessary to significantly intensify the dialogue process between multilateral organizations. already operating a new ratio to promote the idea of regulation security system is about 4 such organizations as the united states, the collective security treaty organization, and the ration economic union. the commonwealth of independent states and the shanghai cooperation organizations that we consider it possible that other influential, your ration associations from southeast asia to the middle east will join these processes in the future. for us, we believe that the time has come to start the discussion of a new system of bilateral and multilateral guarantees of collective security in your ration. at the same time, it is necessary in the long time to gradually phase of the military presence of external powers in the region region. here, of course, we are aware that in the current situation, this point may seem unrealistic, but that will change. however, if we build a reliable security system in the future, there will simply be no need for such a presence of out of region military contingency existing would be that. but to be honest, an issue, there are no need today either just occupation and that's all in the fine analysis,

we believe that countries and regional structures and you raise, you should themselves identify the specific areas of cooperation in joint security . so just leave as a guided by this, they must also build a system of working institutions, mechanisms, and agreements that would really serve to achieve common stability and development . going so now in this sense that we support our beller russian friends initiative to develop a program document, a charter of multiple out and diversity in the 21st century bugle. and it can formulate not only the framework, principles of your agent architecture based on the essential norms of international law, but also strategic vision of the nature of multiple entities and in a broader sense you pretty are with them. and multilateralism as a new system of international relations, which would replace the wisdom centric world edition of something that i consider it important. i would like to ask you to thoroughly look out on this document without partners and with all interested states. and i will add that when discussing such complicated and comprehensive issues, we need as broad representation as possible and a consideration of different approaches and position because usage and the 5th i'm a crucial part of the nation. security and development system of macbooks should

definitely be the issues of the economy. social well beings, mature integration system and mutually beneficial cooperation from the city. as well as addressing such common problems as overcoming public key can equality the climate for, for the environment and developing mechanisms to respond to the threats of fund that makes some prices in the global economy. all that is important to us, the west not only undermine the world's military political stability by its actions as compromising. we can the p market institutions by sanctions and trade voice and using the i m f and the world bank and twisting the climate agenda. it has been restraining the development of the global south yielding and competition even by the rules that the west has written for itself. it applies prohibitive, barriers, and all kinds of protectionism. excuse me, that the united states has abandoned the world trade organization. as an international trade regulator, everything is blocked where meanwhile, the pressure is exhausted and not only competitors, but on their own satellites, who suffice it to see how they are now siphoning off the juices from the european economies which are teetering on the rank of recession. since western countries

have frozen some of russia's assets and currency results and now they are trying to invent some legal justification for their reversible appropriations. tom is on the other hand, however, despite all the crooked lawyers, and festival obviously remains theft and will not go unpunished. the issue is even deep by stealing russian assets. they will take one more step towards destroying the system that they created themselves, and that for many decades, making sure their prosperity allowed them to consume more than they onto this and attracted money from all over the world. to debts and liabilities. see now it is becoming clear to all countries, companies and silver and wealth funds that their assets and reserves are far from safe, both legally and economically. and anyone could be the next in line for expropriation by the united states in the west. those far in southern wealth funds could also be the one from that there was already a growing distrust of the financial system based on western reserve currency. as it has appeared, a certain outflow of funds from securities and bonds of west and countries as well as from some european banks, which were until fairly recently considered to be absolutely reliable to put

capital in. gold is also being taken out from those banks. and this is the right thing to do. i believe that we need to seriously intensify the formation of effective and safe. let the multi level for an economic mechanisms as alternatives to those controlled by the west. this includes the expansion of settlements and national currencies. the creation of independent payment systems and the building of value changed to fed bypass the channels and you prolonged or compromised by the west miller. naturally, it is necessary to continue efforts to develop international transport. colorado senior ration. the continental has russia as its natural mutual difficult cross product through the ministry of foreign affairs. i instruct you to assist as much as possible in developing international agreements and all these areas that i would say are extremely important for strengthening economic cooperation between our country and our partners. the, the should also given new emphasis to building a large erosion partnership, which in essence may become a socio economic basis for a new indivisible security system in europe. for as a mcculloch's proposal is aimed to establish a system where all nations can feel secure with such a framework,

we could approach today's numerous conflicts in a different way. because more constructively, the issues of insecurity and mutual distrust are not limited to the region context . reprising tensions of evidence worldwide in the interconnection and independence or 5 world constantly apparently with the ukrainian crisis serving as a tragic example with this, with percussion spreading across the globe. do you want to clarify right away? the crisis involving ukraine is not a conflict between 2 states, so people standing from issues between them. so if that was the case, there is no doubt that the russians and ukrainians, united by a shared history and culture to spiritual values and the millions of familial and human connections would have found a fair resolution to any disputes and disagreements. meanwhile, the situation is different. as the rest of the conflict on not end bilateral relations, actually, the events in ukraine are a direct result of global and european developments from the late 20th and early 21st century. so a, b, c. they stem from the aggressive, unrestrained utterly reckless policy that the west has been pursuing for many years long before the special military operation began. the leads of western countries,

as i mentioned earlier today is the set of cost for further geo political restructuring of the world. after the end of the cold war, they came to establish and enforce the so called rules based order, strong solver and self sufficient states simply do not belong with this explains the policy of containment directed against our country as something is in the united states in europe openly declared the goals of this policy and speaking today about the so called the colonized ation of russia. so essentially, this is an attempt to ideologically justifies the division of our fatherland along ethnic lines. the dismemberment of the soviet union and russia has been a discussion topic for a long time as everyone in this room is well aware. and pursuing the strategy, western countries, ink absorber and militarily, and politically develop territories nearest where you and your police that have been 5. now, 6 of the waves of nato expansion. the they sought to transform ukraine into the stronghold and anti russia to achieve these objectives, they invest in money and resources. both additions and the entire parties rewrote his story. and if educational programs,

i'm not you and groups of neo nazis and radicals, and you want to stay for that because they did everything possible to undermine our interstate ties. divide us, you can turn out people's against each other. they would have pursued that policy even more brazenly and unceremoniously, had it not been for south eastern ukraine, the region that had been part of historical great, a russia for centuries, which was in their way, the people who lived there and still do, continued to advocate veteran closer ties with our country, including when ukraine declared independence in 1991 ethnic russians and ukrainians, as well as representatives of other ethnic groups. even though they were united by the russian language. culture, traditions, and historical memory from ukrainian presidents and presidential hopefuls simply have to reckon with the opinion, moods and interests of those people through the millions of people living in the southeast ukraine and politicians needed their votes. however, having use their support when running for high posts, they later maneuvered out of doing what they promised got out of it lied, and cited the so called european choice. they did not dare several times with

russia though, because southeastern ukraine had a different view. and one that was to be reckoned with this to ality has always been present in the ukraine in government's policies ever since the recognition of independence, the west on. so that of course, a new model. but i'm going to look at the request and politicians have a long been aware of the problems in ukraine that could be rig temps really should . they also realize the importance of the se as a restraining factor. and knew that even use of propaganda could not radically change that they know that they were not trying that way, but it was really difficult to reverse the situation with these tries, they might, there was not a chance they could distort the historical identity and consciousness of the majority of people in southeastern, who came to eradicate good feelings for russia and the sense of our historical communities, even from the younger generation. and they decided to use force again away to go on, breaks the people in the southeast as if they didn't matter to do this. they masterminded, organized and financed and armed cool. clearly taking advantage of the difficulties and political infighting and ukraine. they pretended purposefully inconsistent. they will squeeze the massive wave of riots by lens and motors and sweat thorough

ukrainian cities. finally, radical nationalist seized and use of power and cancer with their aggressive nationalist slogans including the rehabilitation of nazi henchmen for proclaimed at a level of state ideology. and they know great in the policy of, of abolishing the russian language and all aspects of government and society. and stepped up pressure on orthodox believe is an interference in church affairs, which eventually led to a schism. no one seemed to notice that interference, like it was no big deal, try something like this. elsewhere. everyone will go so ballistics, you will regret it to them, so that over there, this is allowed to use because it is against russia, as is well known, mutual millions of people residing in ukraine, primarily in its eastern region. they made a stand against the cool. they began to be threatened with violence and terror. in the 1st place, the new authorities in cuba started preparing an attack on the russian speaking crimea. which tremendous, as you may know, was transferred from the surface out to ukraine in 1954 with the violation of all norms of the law and procedures. even those in effect in the soviet union at that

time. because in this situation, we certainly could not have benjamin leave without protection of the people of crimea. and so, based upon this month, they made their choice. and as is common knowledge, the historic unification of premium festival with russia to place in march, 2014, the peaceful protest against the crew and cod gulf coast. on odessa, the internet's against getting married, but were suppressed with the kid regime and nationalist groups unleashing the reign of tara human funding. if there is no need to recall all this, for everyone is well aware of what was happening in those regions. in may, 2014 referendums were held on the status of the the net screen, little guns people's republics, at which the overwhelming majority of local people voted for independence sovereignty or what i mean. this bids the following question. so if people generally express their willing this way and declare their independence people present in this room know that they suddenly caught and had the full right and reason to do that under international law, including the right of people to self determination. and there is no need to remind this to you, of course, but seems to the media. that's what i will say that the optical,

one paragraph to me of the un charter. it extends this right now, but it was not letting me recall in this connection, the notorious cost of a precedent, which is much we spoke many times about this in the past, but i will say it once again. now, the precedent that the western countries created themselves in an absolutely identical situation. they recognized kosovo succession from serbia in 2008 as legitimate. i'm assuming plato, the international court of justice issued it's well known advisory opinion based on article one, the kind of graph 2 of the one shot to it ruled on 22 in july, 2010. that's coming my quote to so easily since, you know, general prohibition against the unilateral declaration of independence may be inferred from the practice of the security council. with next quote to the general international law contains no applicable prohibition of declaration of independence . more than that, it said that the parts of any country which decided to declare their independence were not obliged to apply to the central organs of their former state. they wrote all this with their own hand in black and white so that the nets coming against republics have the right to declare their independence. and of course they did. if

this issue even cannot be considered in a different way, but what did the key of regime do in this situation? she keeps it fully disregarded people's choice. and i'm at least a full scale war against the new independent states in the people's republic have done best with the use of aircraft artillery and tags. when they launched, bombing and artillery attacks on peaceful city stores and resorting to an invitation for you to to name was. so what happened next up in the system? will the people have done best took up arms to protect their lives. their homes is their rights and legitimate interest in the west issue. the prevailing narrative is that russia initiated the war with its special military operations and is therefore the aggressor. so it is allowed to attack the russian territory using wisdom weaponry. it is argued that ukraine is merely defending himself and is justified in doing so. i want to reiterate, russia did not start the war, who it was, the kia, presume that initiated hostilities following the declaration of independence by residents of certified. so if you claim in accordance with international law and continues to do so, if we don't recognize the right of these people is to declare their independence or

this. and then this is indeed aggressive to keep students from. those are those who have supported the camera. james war machine, or the folks over the years, the are there for accomplices to this aggression and bruce city. and then school back in 2014, the residence of dumbass refused to surrender, to illustrate units to the ground how strongly failed the punitive forces that eventually pushed them back from the next question i'm against was pretty, we should be we hope this wouldn't bring those who initiated the violence to their senses, you meet you to hold the bloodshed, you rush. i made its customary appeals for negotiations. besides, the adults began involving cube and representatives of the done best republics. with the support of russia, germany, and france, we took them pen. the tops were not easy, but ultimately led to the conclusion of the minster agreements in 2015. we took their implementation very seriously, hoping to resolve the situation within the framework of the peace process and international law. there was hope that this would lead to the recognition of the legitimate interests and demands of done by us, including in training, this special status of these regions and ensuring the fundamental rights of the

people living there followed while maintaining ukraine's territorial integrity. we were prepared for this and sought to persuade the residents of these territories to resolve issues through such means. in the 1935 facets, easily led by dictator benito mussolini decided to expand its colonial empire in africa and take over the opium. by that time, ethiopia was the only fully independent states on the continent. back in 1896, its inhabitants were able to feed the italian colonies and defend their independence. since then wrong craves for revenge. for the humiliating defeat.

in the morning of october, 3, 1935. without any announcement, the flashes attacked ethiopia and bombarded it most severely. d. d. o. b, an armed forces bogged courageously, but the roots, l a. d. a battalion knew no bounds. they use not only massive bombing attacks on civilians, but also chemical weapons, toxic gases. this change the course of the war. as a result of the occupation of ethiopia by the fascist 760000 people were killed. the capture of the african state was committed with europe, staff, and approval. britain and france recognize the annexation, giving the green light to a further fastest expansion in the world, and paving the way for the outbreak of world war 2. the

release of come to the russian states never as one of the most sense community best ingles, all sense and up the speed . what else calls question about this? even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on the russians to day and split our t smooth neck, even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube, the tv service with question, did you say even closer to the,

the the, [000:00:00;00] the smoke food. yeah. so reilly and how does he have? his protest is cool for the removal of the government and hostages to return to the russian defense ministry. the pools at vaughan says across the front lines and the premium complex, as it says, again, it keep positions and take out weston westman as the so the ukraine p summit opens at stores in switzerland, nations around the world boy called the gathering. they say that without rush where