no, they don't come, robert was accomplished after the incredible process would need precious participation gone to request the absence of the lesson for the reasons are top stories on artsy, 14 countries refuse to sign off on final declarations from the so called you rand, ukrainian p summit in switzerland, the vast majority from the global south. we are on the very border between russia and ukraine's heart of region. these are the positions of russian u. a. v. pilots. as the russian army advances through the heart of region. you are the operators from the off month battalion play approval role in the operations and an idea of bulldozer exams, the body of a palestinian man killed during it is really right on the west bank. his mother

speaks archie to appear in his many young men were assassinated and no one can stop them. wesley, to na homes. why do they come to us? when you come to attempt me, i will defend myself the live in moscow. you're watching archie international. i'm rachel. ruble, we started to with the outcome from the ukraine in peace, and that hosted up by switzerland. the tops focused on examining zalinski is proposed a piece formula. it will only $78.00 out of $92.00 states sign that the summit is final declaration with a rock and jordan refusing to do so. at the very last moment. the 14 countries mostly from the global south, including south africa, brazil, india and saudi arabia didn't agree on the documents. all right, let's take a look at the communicate itself,

which the so called piece somebody came up with by the end of it 2 days of talks. the document that calls for the release resolution of disputes through peaceful means that at the same time, washington approved more than $1500000000.00 and military aid. the key of the communique also calls for the direct involvement and dialogue between all parties, though not all participants were on board with the final declaration. here's what indian ambassador to rush up a bank, a poor sad that during the meeting. can all of you on the those options acceptable to both parties can lead to a binding piece? in line with this approach, we have decided to avoid association with the joint communicate or any other document emerging from the summit. they didn't need to hold this conference in order to make any fresh initiative, which would be acceptable to the international community. the whole purpose was to get on board the global major global south countries, which is why the sweet spot,

our minister traveled to india. uh the uh, the foreign minister of you can travel to india and did the set everything possible to uh, to make sure that we attended. so we do the big uh, the real magic set back. that these countries having attended the conference in good faith and expecting that the final communicate would be much more better and would take into consideration some of the basic needs of the situation. which is that any east proposal which would be acceptable to both sites if they simply cannot be initiated by one side and present it to the other side. that's something you have to accept. which is the reason why. and india said study very clearly in a state one that we cannot be a body to the joint communicate of some of the participants who refuse to sign and communicate, raise questions about the summons process,

particularly russia's absence the log i use or i'm disabled because we want to support every piece initiates his body, it is necessary to have old stakeholders involved in the process. and here it is essential to emphasize that any credible process will need russia's participation, gone to request the absence of the lesson for the reasons and the people's republic of china. at this, we saw many people there being more resolve oriented. if the other cross you to the conflict of russia plus present in the room, a bunch of countries were invited but flat out even refused to make the trip a sense. it seemed like a long way to go, i guess, to basically just hang out. let's look at most in control and what do we have found in relation to the peace conference in switzerland instead of just basically an alignment to the side of war. and we'd not agree with that. that is why have decided to suspend my visit. we're willing to participate in the conference, is there freely dedicated to seeking pass to these and to not building blocks from

water. it was an opportunity for western countries that have been using the conflict and ukraine as a pretext to wash tax their cash into making weapons at home. that particular already benefit and military industrial, complex profiteers and shareholders to for 10 for the folks at home that they're really just doing it all for piece representatives of 92 countries attended this ukraine. p. summit organized price with the officials at the request of ukrainian president by mayor zalinski. notably, the global south refused to sign the summits final declaration, which really didn't have much in it beyond buzz words about ukrainian territorial integrity and committing to hanging out again soon and talking about peace again by the way, kosovo, and israel both did sign the declaration you think they might not want to go there when it comes to issues of territorial integrity. they might just want to back out of the room, but no, the communicate also noted that piece, quote, requires dialogue between all parties. that's nice. do all parties also steve

russia, yet 2 members of the global community are fighting and you team up with just one of done deliberately flew the other and think that you're actually going to get anywhere besides maybe further up your own back sides. your brain reacted to the final declaration, saying that it was quote, balance, and that all of its positions were taking into account. yeah, balance in the sense that they just acted as to nar, refers all these countries for ukraine's demands. then they merely alluded to the fact that there's a whole other sides of the conflict being russia. yeah, that's super balanced. it's not like russian president vladimir putin didn't literally layout russia's own peace proposal. the day before this summit, which the by and ministration dismissed out, right? because probably actually have wrote real peace would be tough. probably that's a hard thing to do. and it would also really apply that their big virtue signaling show and switch, and then it didn't take long after the criminal offer was back handed for spokesman

to weigh in with the reality check as good as the every time poor and speaks of peace initiatives. and when attempts are made to enter the political diplomatic channel, and there are certain conditions on the ground, because each time they get worse for ukraine, united because the current dynamics of the situation at the front clearly demonstrates to us that it will only get worse for ukrainians, but probably a politician who puts the interest of the mother land above his own and even above his masters and would think about such a proposal. let's see what happens. i repeat once again, this is not an ultimatum here. this is precisely a peaceful initiative which, which is made taking into account the realities on the ground. one put in does not reject anything. he does not reject the possibility of negotiations. oh, come on now. why actually hammer out real peace when you can just be pretending to

meet about peace. so based play a bunch of western leaders got up at this meeting. time. prime ministers are set, maloney served up some philosophically abstract word, solid about peace, not being confused with the concept of taking control. german chancellor, all actual set, the person's idea of ukraine abandoning the 4 provinces the russian. now planes, along with its native emissions, was just meant to take attention away from the conference that schultz himself get out early and failed. french president, emmanuel and back home said that more countries should be involved in peace meetings like this. just start russia. i guess. you as president joe biden, didn't even make fee of that, but vice president cromwell harris was there to say, how much you pray means to him, president biden. and my support for the people of ukraine is unwavering. we support your claim not out of charity, but because the people of ukraine and their future is in our strategic interest.

just apparently not as much of a, quote, strategic interest as a hollywood fundraiser with obama and a bunch of celebrities which is where biting was instead of being in attendance at this particular joke or rodeo. president biden chose to opt out of the summer, then instead visit a fundraising event in hollywood for his re election campaign. as the clock was ticking and mister biden stood still needing to be pulled up stage by one of his predecessors, brock obama, us president, was apparently focused on something, though no reports have emerged as to what caught his gaze in. what was his latest high profile labs? we discussed the piece summit with john village senior editor for the issue, insight publication, who, unlike biden, was as a piece summit in switzerland. he talked to some delegates and told us they've expressed their fatigue over yet another ukraine. central event, while their national interests are being down played i was able to interact with

a good number that locations that different levels and also interact with some of the journalists covering the event. and from the delegation perspective, you can raise you there. i think overall, most more kind place looking at the performance, the statements that they read over the 2 days basically were written in advance and there were no changing of minds. and the delegations basically said that, you know, we, we know we're not going to change any minds. this is an event, it's a spectacle which 2 is designed to show solidarity and unit indemnity, etc. and then it's key. but there was also vice president, a, an exhaustion part of it, which is probably menu. how much of this do we have to continue to go through an

every meetings g 7, g, 20 nato. you, in general assembly here, which all zalinski ukraine's zalinski ukraine. and there is a 15, and that's, i think if there's one word that describes what i heard most from delegations is they're tired. and also, there is a resentment that the russia, ukraine more is absorbing so much oxygen when they have issues with respect to their own countries that they feel are being pushed downward on the list or ignored because of the russia ukraine war. all. meanwhile, a representative from the south africa who was invited to the peace government says he was unable to speak. the country was among the number of other states to opt out of signing the summit's. final communique in south africa was not able to speak in

the plaza recessions of this conference. hence this region statement. i would like to know position given the importance of assignments and especially in the car, in a global context. our starting point must be that russia and ukraine should find themselves on the road to peace. our actions should not foreclose the possibility of russia and ukraine, finding their way to the negotiating table professionals. i'm not, this is so that figure participated in this process in order to construct each finding piece. so human not being given a chance to speak is kenny, no coincidence. and if you know anything about public, i'm the nothing happens by accident would choices, especially the mention of particular countries. a particular people carefully select to, to, to convey. so it can be such as in segments, particularly segments like these was what somebody for the rejected the segments communicate that was adopted by most of the nations and international organization . saying to resolve the ongoing crisis. diplomatic engagement through dialogue needs to be given more consideration. basically,

russia not being present defeats the purpose of this whole summit. we're most focused on creating conditions for di, look for building trust between the parties. engaging with both sides. our assets should be on engaging in dollars, fostering and promoting steps to end the war not to manage the war. he also objected to the communications paragraph which stated that in the city or use of nuclear weapons in the context. busy of an ongoing for case you print is in admissible. well for my to say to this narrow would the pro he bishan on the city to oh, use of nuclear weapons to that you created context owing the way as the pro he fission applies globally. and so that's a couple will continue to be leading proponent of total per a bishop on the city. it's all use of nuclear. we put in, in the context. we have also saudi arabia, india, thailand, indonesia, brazil, mexico, in the u, a. e will, will also among participants that declined,

designed to communicate. we saw it, you like to enjoy the withdrawal being the signatures off the declaration following the p summit as well. the reasons for the cube refusal with jordan currency, i know. and, but what we do know is that the landscape failed to win over t nations from the global solves the costing a saddle over it keeps the bid to too broad a support ticket is russia. we also knew that the axis of a substantial african presence as such a publicized yet failed agenda speaks volumes of the news is um or the, the width is getting ability to see the continent on the 5 as it can be, does were present at the submit it will only succeed efforts, indications of from $54.00 african countries, and that the significant obstacle whose credibility, because the once mutual switzerland has made no secret of its desire to putting this rest. yes, was foreign minister even questioned motives of those countries attended the summit,

asking, do they just one piece for the own game or they support ukraine's, the african participants told very clearly we are here because we have to solve this problem. these was one and the other and the 2nd was very, very important. the sentence a very difficult mean. they went and to solve the problem in order to re establish the food security in the countries tense. the question of why was, of course, are you ready to solve the problems in the direction of the is just and sustainable these or, or just in a direction of peace. it is a kind of, of, of de, lemme, in that they, well, they want to solve the problem, but they see that they could solve the problem in, not in the sense of adjust these for ukraine. and of course,

the of the talks that center around the global for the security, even canyon president regretted that the war has had such devastating impact across africa. saying that can yet have not been spade. as the conflict had led to increase the prices of fertilizes present to a winter as far as the fall to the european union and the united states over the seizure off russian assets due to the ongoing conflicts in ukraine. saying that to what not, what most of the e u member states were doing was against the spirit of the united nations. the episode over this weekend points to uncomfortable reality for the u. s. and it's at least allies because for the global south of the war is recreate simple, but has to be managed by dialogue and compromises. in fact, india as far administer once puts the view off these global self countries and the natural, when he said, you're all the things that you have problems are the world's problems. but the

world's problems, not you, who will just problems. these words have surprised many wisdom, indeed is who have concluded properly correctly and over the weekend. that if the united states can not pursue a to the global salt into agreeing its own, global influence and power is probably we can. all right, let's cross live now to victor, gal, chair, professor at cynthia university. victor, good to have you on the program with us, you know, following the summit and it was mostly western countries that signed that joint. give me an a k. i know china did not participate in the summit, but what is china is position on the document. the 1st of all, the so called the switch geneva, of these conferences started on the wrong foot to begin with because for any piece to be talked about for this wall between russia and ukraine, you need to bring russia and ukraine to the same table. now this piece talk didn't

bring russia to the table, which is the wrong decision, i would say, and was only one side of the was the representative of the table. the whole conference may turn out to be a one sided conference of actualization. rather than about is the conference to listen to the views and the positions of all russia and ukraine to stop with. that's the 1st one. the 2nd point is that what does this conference want to achieve? does it really want to achieve ceasefire? if it does, then, as i mentioned, you need to have both ukraine and pressure. so do at the same table, which they didn't know for any declaration or communicate to be signed up, published at the end of the conference. if you really do not have a balanced view about what really has happened and what should be down to bring the walton and again, this one sided, it does not represent the time of the all mankind. for example, the 1000 even represents the views of ukraine on the one hand and russia on the

other hand. so i think the congress in itself very unfortunate, they was a big failure because it wasted a lot of time. you brought so many countries to geneva to talk about peace butler real contagion was not peace reorientation was not to really achieve ceasefire to bring this wall to an end. because if you really want to achieve ceasefire, bring russia and ukraine onto the same table. so that they can talk to each other, they can really negotiate the conditions upon which peace can be restored. charlotte didn't participate because townhouse always wanted to break both russia and ukraine onto the same table. and when it was finalized that rochelle was mostly invited and russell would not attend them, this conference would serve no useful purpose at all from the chinese perspective. i post marketing trying to make the right decision not to attempt this conference

in geneva. yeah, i think that leads me to my next question. the us national security adviser said that china escaped the summit because putting a request in china to skip it. it is that based in any reality? how is that statement being seen by china? would china do something like that just because putting, told them to a well, 1st of all, i seem to us, the official simply cannot understand the reality that both china and russia viewed each other as complete equals with each other. we respect each other. we do with each other on equal terms, and neither time nor rest yet can dictate to the side of this is exactly the point that the united states officials call it completely wrong. they fault one is above the other with the turn that in russia, one is subordinate to the other between china, russia completely wrong between china and the russia. we are complete, you close with each other and we respect each other. and this is the basis for the

friendship and a very close cooperation between china and russia for many international issues. and the fact that china russian border, which is well 1300 kilometers long, is stable, peaceful, and mutually constructive. and is an on the boulder is a may just stabilize, you can factor for peace and security on the european continent as a whole, as well as in the world as a whole. of a victor, china has called for russia, ukraine of peace talks. as soon as possible, of course we just had this uh, a piece summit's over the weekend. that doesn't include rush. 5 putting laid out his plans for peace on friday. do think that piece stops. are possible between the 2 sides at this point. a well from day one, when this war broke out back in 2022. charlotte immediately called fuzzies. fine,

because turned the fault, having the war was the wrong thing. and he was there any problems between russia and ukraine. it's much better to just just sit down and talk and negotiate with each other rather than using mortgages to each other. and child suppose, you know, has never changed. china has been more than 2 years, always being called on russia and ukraine to sit down, to resolve, to appease to negotiation diplomacy, to talk the shows out. and both russia and ukraine need to refuse to be held hostage for other powers, like united states lied to natal member, stays which may actually want to pull more fuel onto this fi in the war, the ukraine to gain their own, to political purposes and gains and i've seen china will continue to do the rising . that is to call solve a ceasefire to uh, arch all the object punches to discontinue supply and weapons to one side,

all the other. and i think negotiations for a very complicated one. i just need to be down to incomplete privacy and great confidentiality. it cannot be conducted as a roman conference, for example, open to everyone because you will lose the sensitivity of privacy and confidentiality. and you will really spoil you on the phone before it just spots. i think you will be the highest, the foremost diplomacy and the most a tearing skills to bring russia m ukraine on to the same table, incomplete confidentiality so that they can talk about the fuels which they come presents each of those positions. and eventually they can get close up to each other to get this walk result robin then allowing this more to continue and to further detour age or even to get out of control or from a conventional law to

a new criminal which won't be a disaster for mankind as a whole, i didn't turn that has the right proposal for the ceasefire between russia and ukraine, and i hope the world will listen. yeah, certainly nobody wants to nuclear war. a victor is a significant contingent of participants in this peace conference over the weekend, including india, saudi arabia, brazil, and south africa. rejected that the joint communicate announced at the summit. and of course, even more countries than even attends of china as well. as we've been saying, but what does this say about the global support for this strategy that ukraine is implying here? well, 1st of all, this fact really demonstrated in a very possible way that the world we are leaving is a multiple low spots unit. the world is found a world that every single country can dictate is of data to the rest of the world. and i would say countries like india and brazil,

all these incompetent countries are just now measured off not only important in themselves, but also have their own brain power. they have the role of brentwood bandwidth, for example. they can come up with their own conclusion. they cannot be easily dictated to one way or another. i ukraine on the one pads or by any of its patches. on the other hand, i think they will use that little brain power to analyze the situation as you agree or disagree on the major points in principle. and they will analyze all the factors older uses to come to their own conclusions. this will make the whole world today a bunch better work, more pallets the world where countries big or small, we have a chance to present their own view problems in only one view dictated spice of other countries. all right, we're gonna leave it there. victor gouter professor at central university of victor . great to have you on, as always, thank you. thank you ma'am,

is what has to be from a russian president, dimitri measure that has labeled the ukraine, p summit's, an animal farm, referencing the orwellian novel. at that, that is, participants have no idea of what exactly they are doing there. as the stomach only diverts attention from the root causes of the conflict from our on this and other reactions to the switch peace conference to go to our website, r t dot com. the country is at the switzerland, at the central and conference for push paper, trying to resolve their credit and conflict with our russia. the russian army units are continuing to carry out their offensive in the hard top region. there you are. the operators are playing a crucial role in providing vital support for combat units involved in the fighting or taking respondent egos down off brings us more. we are on the very border between russia and ukraine's heart of region. these are the positions of russian you a v pilots with the much special forces. these guys, uh,

pretty much the eyes for everyone here from tillery to the grants in the trenches. 3 lines, waiting in the wind, almost intention below you into the full sense of tranquillity. both russia and ukraine use fixed some of vegetation to conceal troops and equipment. are the best thing for this position? is it power line construction? and the middle of the field was human there on tennis, which ones meet us on it? we have seen ukraine on the bus now here, most likely the vast station on the concrete slab onto the construction work here begins with the 1st rays of sun. a unit itself can be kazi draw. now prices has no shortage of targets. the

motors and how it has seized the opportunity over surveillance, drone and the sky, and add their own beat to this. definitely percussion up up, up pretty low, low to be as low as well. could i see we well, it's difficult to describe the really motion in anticipation of and off to every good hit. this is where you realize that for the boys here, it's funny thing. why do you in the board? i was even told that if i'm allowed that i saw it and that they do put everything they've got into it brings the victory closer. but the commander of this detachment to going under the cool sign, the haze tells me he trains his men to keep a keen mind. it will fail. there is always room for positive emotions which you feel when you get the job done well. the guys are happy when the drone or tillery

hits the target, or they see a good stipe or shot. the main thing is that these motions should not be allowed by blood less. one should not lose one's self to blood madness. it should feel like happiness for success in your job, not happiness for killing another ukrainian. we're just happy to hit the enemy. that's it. a motion should be controlled. if we fail to do that, we're no better than animals. and this mentorship seems to work for them, but we can not behave like some creatures. well, i won't call them animals as i don't want to offend them, even after all the people i've met with things i've seen. so sometimes you feel an inhuman rage and wish to destroy your enemy with as much power as possible. but deep inside you realize that they are human beings. after all, we get it and somehow you want to solve everything in a human way and reach peace. but if our enemy is being brainwashed with the idea that only sub humans live in russia,

said some musk advice who must be destroyed despite all that, we should still act humanely with them and give ukrainian soldiers the opportunity to surrender fights as hey, a balance on a razor's edge, there warriors who have refused to let blind rage and madness of war changed their sole. i'm, it was done of reporting from the russia ukraine. border. ok, see now to the west bank for more than 500 palestinians have been killed and is rarely raised in the past 8 months of trends that has escalated wisdom. war in does a warning. this report contains disturbing images for the edge published in the local media so as an id, a vehicle picking up a body from a destroyed misuse to building and throwing it away. 3 palestinians died and several others were reportedly detained during the raid. as real claims those killed were shooting at them, posing a threat to soldiers are to soap with them on.