a and illegal slave trade. about 17000000 people were forcefully shipped across the atlantic. not including those who died on the way due to unbearable living conditions. modern historians estimate that for each slave ship to america, there were 5 who died while captured during transportation, and cruel obliteration of rebellion. this roof was the whole tre practice by the leading european countries took away tens of millions of african lives. the organization of united nations class advised the trends atlantics laved rate as one of the greatest human rights abuses in the history of humanity. this is the biggest act of deportation of people ever seen by mankind.

they have the supreme court overturn griswold so they can prevent american women from contraception. they may say we wouldn't do that because of precedent. why would anyone believe them any sooner? chuck schumer raises question. americans are often asking lately why would anyone believe republicans anymore? yeah. when it comes to reproductive rights for public and say they are doing exactly what they have always campaign to do on sky. now here's an on this edition of $360.00 view. we're going to look at the latest on the battle for reproductive rights in america contraception. and if this is creating a very lucky path for republicans on the campaign trail, let's get started. the supreme court over turning roe vs wade in june of 2022. has the lead democrats to

victory an election since? no democrats have decided this topic is their best chance for continued success in 2024. but fearing the attention subsiding on the subject have introduced another aspect into the argument, the right of contraception and in vitro fertilization. the senate majority leader, chuck schumer, democrat from new york, is planning to potentially force for publicans to take tough votes on the issues. photo ball republicans will have to face their constituents from far right to independence, single issue, voters, and cannot avoid the controversial topic. a local minority of the party feel both i vs and birth control are in the same category as abortion, and should be outlawed. know, try and prevent any damage to the g o. p. lead senate republicans are going on a talk show circuit, tore all the try and change the narrative as

a matter of law or there should be a choice that is available for parents because it is profoundly pro family. it enables at the ivy f enables i, i have a lot of friends, i'm sure you to, that it is how they are parents and they loved with their children. they want to raise their children. they want to be incredible moms and dads, etc, ted cruz, etc. katie brett introduced legislation to prevent states from blocking access to ivy services. and when asked about those who feel the fertilized eggs not use during ivy of treatment or form of abortion, the texas senator had this to say. i think that's a moral decision. any person can make enough that's a decision they can make with, according to their faith and, and, and according to their understanding of god's teaching. now where it joined cruise in his interview, arguing members of the democratic party are fear mongering that republicans wish to ban ivy on the left is fear mongering,

saying that we are not going to protect ivy f i v f as protected and senator cruz and i are going to make sure it continues to be protective. it is pro life, it's proof family, it's per woman. and i believe it was a party of families. this new legislation comes after alabama's top court ruled, frozen embryos are legally children, and the destruction of these embryos constitute a crime under the states wrongful death of a minor law. now, the abortion of reproduction takes center stage. it seems women are increasingly becoming more or less cleaning. well, men are becoming more conservative. the whole reason contraception is such a hot topic is because the hook of culture and getting married later in life is becoming a societal norm. now the times of chaperones in waiting for marriage seemed to actually be long gone. but it's just actually beneficial. or is there something to be said about taking responsibility for the people you decide to sleep with. having prepared or sex actually increases the odds of getting

a divorce by 400 percent. and using contraception before or during marriage increases the odds of getting a divorce. i have to to 100 percent and there's a lot to impact. so let's bring in our panel health professional and do dessie k robinson. woodrow johnson, who is the ceo of revere, strategies and timothy gordon, who is the host of the pod cast rules for retrograde. thank you so much for joining me on this lots to unpack on it. it does the i want to start with the abortion issue because democrats feel this is a topic which can garner them support and engagement. so even republicans can't really blame them for trying to make it a repeating headline. however, how spell it is do you think the republican party on this side of issues of i v as in contraception? and it seems as though they are very split and, you know, take cruise, who is, i don't know if he's the modem of,

of morality for a party. but, you know, he just said that idea should be a matter of, you know, a family's moral compass, and that is what literally people in people who have any conscious around the choice has been said about the whole spectrum of reproductive rates. reproductive rates encompasses everything. someone's decisions to have a baby, someone's decision not to bring a baby to term. and so all of that is a decision that happens with within a family and for a woman. and for anyone she or, or she for that matter because that have a choice of whether they want to engage in families. they have to make those decisions for themselves. and that is not what is over whelming, we spoken about within the republican party. they're consistently trying to control

women's bodies. this is a part of the freedom control women's bodies. and along with that comes to the level of she, you know, even in the, your lead in talking about her own. sure. it implies that there is some level of i'm assuming that is going on, people are running wild and needing to have abortions to 2 reasons. so of the she of them having freedom to have sex with whatever they choose. but isn't that what sexual freedom is? so just say is the ability to run around and have sex with wherever you choose and not facing the consequences for it's about not facing any consequences. and everyone has the consequences for the, for the decisions that they make. but the, the talking points and the republic give sort of work is that people should be

shade and punished for having sex. and they should go ahead and have these because that's what they deserve. if they decide to have sex and that doesn't do anything, but she, when they blame women and bring children into the world who are going to be left in the world where republicans over the last 2 years have denied having formula. we had a formula shortage. these are the same, the same party who's like, why do we have to pay for other people's shoulders at lunch? they never want to engage in any of the social programs that would ameliorate the lives of people. once i have children, i never hear me talking points or any defense. oh, really reading the lives of people who have children. i never human left. i mean, excuse me, the right. talking about you can pay. i never heard the right talking about universal health care. i never heard the right talking about family leave and i

dont showing that we did the right talking about the who the maternal numbers of black, maternal health. okay. well i haven't changed me. well no, i'm talking about that now. i agree with that now i would bring woodrow into this because as we're all the time or the republicans, democrats are saying that decision from dogs versus jackson threatens the right to birth control. however, the case just included that the constitution does not confer a right to abortion. and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people in their elected representatives. so on the opposite side of there are democrats gas fighting this issue for election purposes, the sky. yeah, 100 percent or gas letting us. i mean, no, no, thank 0, the guest. i mean there's just, everything's the same just isn't correct. i haven't seen a republican say any of those things you say, you just played a club of a bunch of the leaders in our party. not, you know, literally saying the opposite of what she's saying. so i, i mean, you know,

other than the, the side notes in the end, but which we can unpack if you want to. but if there's, is, this is absolutely just fear mongering from, from the democrats. well, that's the thing, tennessee i've gotta ask you, cuz i can say your facial expressions during this conversation. if you don't necessarily agree, do you agree with our public is are handling this conversation and should be more joining? and i mean right now is just ted cruz and katie brit that are talking about legislation to protect. you have to counter democrats, go after them. what should be the conversation that's being had it was we all know republicans are hopelessly long housed and we shouldn't listen to them. but i want to address the 2 fundamental principles that western civilization was predicated on. number one, people should be shamed and punished for having sex outside of marriage because the family is the single cell of society and you can't have society without shame and punishment for having sex outside of marriage. number 2, i stop this country,

began to resemble a foundational principle around the civil war. that's what we're told by the historians, that people should be shamed and punished for murdering other people. now, i don't really care what ted cruz thinks about. i v f because he's a long house to republican. but if goes in every case, stand for multiple murders, a little human beings. and by the way, so does contraception we we found out that almost all contraception always has the possibility of acting as an a board of fits in. so if we believe in these 2 foundational principles of western civilization, i don't really care what some cocked republicans say about it. what a true christian believes about this is that sex outside of marriage kills society, and killing humans, kills humans. and those are the 2 foundational principles of all western society. so i'd like to hear the response to that, or do we still believe killing humans is wrong in this country?

dessie desi. as well, we can have a conversation about what is considered a human when you have a lot of those of cells inside of oh, you know person is still be in this country. yes, it is wrong. i'm the person or a person on the train floss or i'm talking about human beings biologically. and philosophically you've got 46 chromosomes of human beings. i'm asking, do you think murder and humans is wrong? i'm not talking about persons. i'm. i'm murdered a human that for really people who are alive is murder. yes, that is no person. right. he did at a time the view and i do not agree on so we can continue personally begins at like

40 years old. do you believe that a 2 year old can be murder? sorry, i'm not going to come back. no, i get what you're doing really, but i, i think does he has the point of vag, it's one person believes that lies to get the conception initial and the other person believes at some point. dessie, i imagine you believe once the baby takes its 1st breath, sometimes there are at some point during the that 9 month period. that's still the debate that happens at the same time. you know, i wanna bring this back to how we started this. i'm going to bring you in on this one, woodrow because this apply to the political ization is what i want to focus on is because we can have the philosophical, we can have the religious, we can have that debate. we're trying to focus on the politics of this because i think both sides are using this towards their own advantage as to the disadvantage of the, of the people involved. so wardrobe, does this take the wind of democrats sell it for public and do decide to take more of an aggressive stance or did they risk to disengaging the more conservative wing by agreeing with democrats regarding the need for contraception? ivy yes, i don't think it's

a matter of republicans agreeing with contraceptive or not. it's just, this is where the law is and they are, i mean simply, this is just the email. i mean like, you know, and i might personally agree with uh, with, with my friend here, but i, that's just not where the lights and it's just completely out of last seal. and ironically, i left you under that side of it. well, you know, i do want to, i talked about this or does it because contraception access to birth control has found a way into the national defense authorization act of all things. we talked about women, reproductive rights and never thought that i would see it actually put into the national defense authorization act in the form of an amendment that expands access to contraception for women in uniform saying that it's important for military readiness. do you see this as an act of desperation to the birth control, to be ready for battery? think they're trying to make this a little bit more complicated than what should be? why does it need to be complicated to extend the rights of people to a gauge,

to have birth control available to them so that they can make the decisions that die the trajectory their life? it is simple. now we want to get into the, we've about a decay complex, but i mean, the reality is 90 percent of women who use birth control at some point in their life. and so it is a form of health care. and so we want people to be military ready to be ready for anything. so we're, we have to give them the choice and the ability to make the decisions that's, that's the trajectory there why birth control is included in that it is included in the conversation of the complete our reproductive rights that i have all of that. but i would wonder if that argument would go against the, that was the argument that would be why women should even be allowed to be in combat just to be on the front lines. and they'll try because of the fact that they have those reproductive, those reproductive capabilities. don't you think this kind of brings that into

question if, if, why are we bringing sex into it? shouldn't they all be counted equal regardless? well, it's a, it's a medical condition. it would be no different, but it's called by the male or female being on the front lines together. why are they having sex? if they're there to fight a war? how does that military preparedness not having sex with joe there? well, i mean it, there, that's the thing. this is about being military prepared for over a war prepared men and women together having that's how babies are made. so why is this, why are we paying for birth control, the part of our military defense spending? why are we not actually spending it to defend our country? why we keep, why wouldn't we allow a woman to have an opportunity to use birth control? if it is once a piece for military, right. i don't understand why we would, it wouldn't extend that price control kill society. well, i thought we all functioned on the premise that what kills society and enter rates

us weakens us and emboldens our foes is bad and ought to be outlawed. well, particularly at the state level, which holds the 10th amendment police powers. and by the way, all the states held the 10th amendment police powers until 1965 and this country, griswold versus connecticut, which is it to radically federal overreach. but, but, and so i'm not even saying to regulate this at the national level. i'm just saying to go back to what this country always stood for, which is the principal, then under the police power of the 10th amendment. most states don't want unless they're run by elite global lists that are really trying to kill nations and borders and stay and all those things. we shouldn't stand up for things that innovate and destroy society, and those things which innovate and destroy the family also enter bait and destroy the society. and guess what? a bunch of young people running around without pants on impregnating one another and then slaughtering their babies is bad for society. it turns out that i just got

the newspaper. it says that, okay, what shot? well, it didn't say that, that's the premise also dismantled the borders in which every, every republican says that we're supposed to be fiercely to say, well, if we're not engaging in war 2, right? before we take a break, i want to talk about the economy because we're going to go into it more in depth. because when it comes the economy and contraception, there is a redford wilton strategy survey found more than 50 percent of generation z millennials. so they're putting off children because the cost of living is so expensive. economy as in ranked the number one issue for voters is false with society setting too high of a standard for the current generation by eliminating all of their options. woodrow, that was your question. i am ready for it. oh, well i was, i say it is a car. we setting the standards to lie with our economy being so bad. people are wanting to we're not wanting. we're not wanting to have kids. yeah, i mean

a 100 percent and honestly, i think this is all part of the strategy. they don't want americans to have more kids. they want to more legal to come to, to our country. they want to make our economy as terrible as possible because they don't want americans to succeed. is that simple? well, that's the woodrow timothy gordon. i want you to stay right there because we're gonna take a quick break. and when we come back, we are going to discuss about how the, the, or should the political views, but not with the effects. this legislation is having us decide in the future. say to what we've had some exceptions. and i'm here to plan with you whatever you do. do not watch my new show. seriously. why watch something that's so different whitelisted opinions that he won't get anywhere else. welcome to please. i do have the state department to

see i a weapons bankers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your fax for you. go ahead, change and whatever you do. don't my show stay main street because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called direction. but again, it's not, we don't want to watch it because it might just change the way you think the the welcome back to 360 view i'm your has got to know he's across the united states, the catholic church is undergoing an immense shift or even the beginnings of a full split generations of catholics who embrace the modernization of the 19 sixty's by the vatican are increasingly giving away to religious conservatives. now,

while others, including this current president of the united states are embracing a much more progressive form of the religion. madeline hays, a student at benedictine college, takes the church's rules, very serious from people pre marital sex to confession. and she's seriously considering becoming or not. and she has a 3 female students, also considering the same location. there are a lot of things that are like non negotiable to a lot of us who are faithful catholics. and so we don't believe that the church will ever say that like contraception is acceptable. however, i don't think catholics in the past would have ever expect the pontiff, during his 11 years tenure as head of the church to suggest even a few years ago to have it. and saying that he did not judge homosexuals as well as taking a softer stance on abortion and re marriage. this debate is not just happening in

the catholic church as several denominations within the protestant church are either in the midst of the debate or splitting over the same issues. and therefore the foundation of our religious communities are starting to fracture. what effect is that having on society? well, i'm gonna bring back in our panel, dusty k robson, health professional, and do a leader johnston, ceo of revere, strategies and timothy cordon. host of rules for retrograde past podcast. timothy, i'm gonna start with you. how much of a debate do you believe is happening within the catholic church on this issue? and is this kind of divisiveness over an issue new to the catholic church and it's relatively new. as of the late 19 sixty's, the vatican, the 2nd vatican council ran from 1962 to 1965. and what you had there was a loot of renegade pilots who were still a minority, but who had schemed to make certain things happen that,

that haven't been dogmatically blocked for nearly 2000 years at that point. and they used the weaponized ambiguity to put these certain 6 topics on the table. and in the 1970s following the council, you had a couple of liberal popes, notably the 6 who was expected to undo the teachings on contraception. the teachings long held from the decay on word against contraception, the time of the apostles. and he shocked everyone when he released whom on a visa and said no, i can't do it even if i were as liberal as everyone expects. i'm holding the line so in the roman catholic faith it's, it's the one world view. i don't think we should talk about religion. we should talk about the single world you single christianity in the world. where upon the principle of non contradiction is regarded so highly that the,

i don't know what you want to call it. the dialectical materialism of the gaming is, and the idea of the history moves in steps incrementally and all options will eventually be on the table. is singly outlined, so we just believe a jose and it always league way. so in that sense, scotty, there's not really any dialogue to be had no po francis has very left ease of mana vatike into in every conceivable sense. right. and he wants it to be a debate, but it's not. okay, well, i want to bring in word real quick of this to your point. americans criticized other countries who use legislation to control families. china comes to mind. is this not a little hypocritical for dc to have this much influence or try it out this much influence over family planning? i. i don't, i don't think it's after critical because i reject the problem. so the question sky, i don't think that, and even though you know, being tennessee probably go to the same cx churchman, probably, i think, i,

i don't think that this get, this kind of stuff is happening in washington. it is not happening. well, i mean if you're talking about birth control, you're talking about ivy asked if you're talking about all those sorts of things as d. c, getting involved in it. dusty, i've got to come to you in our last few minutes. so we have together. i have to ask though, just you know, devil's advocate or not, is it fair to hold our children to the same standards of the past and suppressed what is a natural desire today society? considering all of the pop culture pressure for intimacy before marriage and expect our children to be out of the same standards that existed in the 1950s. well, i'm just a little bit of the beginning of your question, but what i would say is, i think that we have all we, we probably will continue to have a really difficult time measuring and separating and machine and separating again. religion as a, i think it's a, it's a continued to be, but what we have to make sure that we're doing is preparing people to live. and

education is what does that. and so people should have the choice, but they should have informed choices to do what they want to do with their bodies . we are a much healthier society when people are not solely led by the tree when they are also led by informed choices in education as to what to do with their bodies. then we don't get other people's rights to be able to do that. well, i'm going to give, i can say real quick, i got 20 seconds left to tell me that you want to respond. yeah, this country was predicated on the principle of the states having established sex of christianity. 8 of the 13 have that until the federal tyrants on the bench outlaw that in 1947. because like i said, the 2 foundational principles people shouldn't be having sex outside of marriage or killing each other is literally what both christie, oddity in christendom are predicated upon. so we define health and opposite ways.

desi: well, thank you to our play and we're gonna ended on that one on that side of our thank you, we get into this conversation, we just might in a later. so thank you. jessica k robinson health professional and do love wood or johnston, see of of your strategies and timothy gordon. host rules for retrograde podcast. you know, the 3rd chapter of ecclesiastes is there was a time for everything. and a season for every activity under the habits, including a time to be born. however, if we were to update the well known verse, i think there would be an added disclaimer. the only thing there is not a time for is a politician getting involved. maybe that's because politicians are towards the known for trying to gain control of a situation rather than let nature take its course. this is kind of how i personally feel in regards to contraceptives in i've yes, it's not a politician's job. the legislative science has been able to create a solution for problems which are not jeopardize the integrity of another

fundamental rule of the bible that we have put this generation into a precarious position. and republicans need to be careful when they start legislating both the preventative, as well as the problem. this also allows the democrats to merge the 2 issues as one which will, which make for a very powerful weapon against the republicans and will be used as a valid us citizen, your 360 view of the news affecting you. thanks for watching the when you do the to attempt the extra a month, i see the show event. it will here job to love for the cause of a dish. uh, excuse us,

for the defensive to separate the setup button and not to printer ports and wants to do an easy task like that. if i see the media, i love you focused on the 2 reasons. can you say, when you see the new category, the b service it'll be presented, it was working monday me to work. it stimulates the industry is little less money in the process really left. so should william farmer shots might give us. so we have good cash door to go over, what decision did my lab and what was that man was, what was that ridiculous? and as i put it in the midst of them one today and but you know, so that's what it is that strong to set. i mean shows tools or suspect. pretty sure can was, i'm patient did it for, she's kimble's, i'm best do what i mean. there's a corporate this accomplish after the, the, the,

the pressure and north korea are teaming up to push back against western sanctions plus shaping a new security framework in your range. as the message from the rest of the president's head of his visit to the peninsula. the, the us military staff, director, general warrens about western countries, waning influence and central and western africa. as the worries access to the continents brom materials might be lost. the reality of the moment is below strong also means that finally on the person there will be more difficult to have access along with your the and is rarely as.